5:42 I liked that line so much I said it twice. XD Jokes aside, this was me accidentally leaving in a second take and not picking it up until now. Since removing it would require retiming the entire video, I'mma just leave it in. Sorry about that!
You know, if Steel Wool Studios, or any other developer behind the FNAF franchise decides to use Ella for something instead of just her being there, then I'm ok with greet it with open arms Then again, we could have a Mimic situation and I don't want that, but who freaking knows
Ella, a random doll Charlotte owned as a kid was apparently SO important, that she not only was the whole reason robot Charlie existed, was referenced in a book, and appeared in the Fnaf Movie. A random toy of Charlotte get more continuity than her own twin brother.
It always seemed odd to me that Afton was so scared of hearing Sammy's name in the twisted ones novel. It made him go sombre and tell all his Fredbear's secrets during a confrontation with Charlie. I mean okay his arm was pinned by a spike but he DIDN'T HAVE to tell Charlie the truth about what happened at Fredbear's he could've just done a runner early, saying nothing.
Honestly, it makes sense that Ella's just used as a "vessel" however she needs to be, story-wise. She's a doll- a toy that acts as a storytelling vessel. They are what they need to be at that moment.
My head-canon is that Ella happens to be possessed by the spirit of a little girl. But she just chooses to stand still and do nothing, and she's just as confused as us.
Ella is basically a mask, a shell for whoever’s will she is being used by. From Henry’s weird dysfunctional grief healing, to Elenor’s torment of a depressed girl, and even Afton’s murder nonsense.
It would have been more appropriate to bury Charlie's toddler body. Just putting her in the closet, it just feels like she's just another item to be stored away forever in storage.
Ella can be like a disturbed Toy Story character. Toy Story 1 was originally pretty grim, especially with Woody straight up killing Buzz and being a complete dick to everyone.
The real tragedy of 1:35 AM is she keeps going to people she trusts and expresses how shes having a breakdown and how it happens at the same time each night and asks for help. And every time they say its okay, theyre here for her. Then every time 1:35 rolls around they act confused and hostile when she has a panic attack and tell her to get lost. She tried so hard to reach out and was isolated at every turn. Do thats why the story always stood out to me. Also the ending sickeningly reminded me of Eliza Lam who likely had that paranoid episode before climbing into someplace she got stuck and died.
I always assumed that, in the Silver Eyes trilogy, the adult Charlie bot that eventually became Circus Baby was built first, not because of any weirdness on Henry's part, for once, but because of limitations of the technology. That's part of why it was wrong and he lashed out at it in anger, flooding it with agony and making it alive-ish. That's also why both Ella!Charlie and Circus Baby use the illusion disks, but kid and teen Charlie don't seem to, Henry's obsession with improvement, with making the bodies he gave his daughter more realistic, more able to allow the remains of her in the original doll to live. That doesn't make Henry's whole thing any less weird, but an assumed drive to improve the next iteration of the Charlie bot might also help explain why he was so willing to discard them once he/Charlie/whatever was done with them. The robot bodies were never Charlie to him, just a case for her, it was the original cheap mass manufactured doll that he locked onto Charlie's soul being attached to. So the robot bodies were just as disposable as that animatronic frog doll that he traumatized one of the Charlies with.
Ella was such an interesting character to me, i don't know, theres just something so terrifyingly great about her. She just feels like an important piece to the lore.
6:58 She should have just kept Ella around as a decoration instead of discarding her because her alarm clock function failed. The story about the doll just feels like some lady getting too obsessed with a stupid doll. Is Ella supposed to be like Tomie from Junji Ito's Tomie; a teenage girl that keeps coming back, only to be murdered by some obsessed crazed males? "The Boy" is probably a good scare to read instead of this, even though it's depressing and just left me furious at Tomie for grooming the titular boy that found her resurrected body on a beach.
what a good shout. NotReal would probs love Tomie and the more popular Junji Ito books generally- they have that twisted, semi-campy, almost funny horror she seems to respond to well. I love more Uzumaki chapters than Tomie, but the Tomie bits i love most go way harder honestly. I cheer for a shocking amount of murders she does without ever being completely on side. She’s absolutely malicious but so are the men she encounters so like.. screw those guys, they suck
Ella, from weird doll, to vessel for Henry's memories of grief, to vessel for Eleanor's things, to attempted vessel for Abby. She's just so weird. She's only used, as you said, as a plot tool. And that's basically her personality, being a tool for other character's to use the way they want (mainly to remember a child they lost or to be controlled by another entity).
This is what I really don’t like about Henry ending his life it feels like an excuse to ignore the consequences of his actions. and it’s just strange how the newer Fnaf games are terrified of even mentioning blood meanwhile a man build a robot to hurt himself In the goriest way possible
I agree. Security Breach was rated T, and they censored words like "kill" and "blood" while also taking away Vanny's knife. Meanwhile, some of the books are so over the top gory that it's not even scary. It's just gross. There's only so many times you can describe someone getting mutilated in graphic detail before the shock value is lost.
His suicide in the books was about his mind collapsing from the grief of Charlie's death. In the games it was more about helping others than him being there at all. He says in the insanity ending in politely censored words that he could've killed himself at any point in the games, but resolve stopped him, in direct contrast to the books. He planned for all that time to just fight Afton using his own tricks and that has to be worth something. He did it all to make sure the children had someone in their corner, he didn't care what happened to him, if a Fnaf world cutscene/possible teaser could actually be believed he may have been killed by scrap Baby so never committed suicide in the games, and that in itself would open many cans of worms so to speak.
I love how you've used Comic Charlie as an avatar for your perpetual FNAF ennui. I *really* want to see some kind of "Abridged" version of the character, and I feel like the Ella/Charlie dynamic in particular has so much parody potential. Not sure how one could achieve that kind of "abridged" presentation without actual footage, but you get my point, the vibes are there
Considering how Tales of the Pizzaplex has characters naming mainline FNaF games and acknowledge William Afton as Springtrap in-universe, it wouldn't at all surprise me that the original novel trilogy most likely does also exist in-universe in some form. This wouldn't be the first time the FNaF series has done some meta stuff that end up being canon.
So something I realized after remembering the graphic novel version (I keep forgetting to read the proper novel trilogy so I don't know if it's touched on) is that the ragdoll Henry cried into with the memory of Charlie was her core for a reason. What does Henry remember of Charlie in FNaF 6? A kindhearted girl who would not be content to have people suffering. Which is true, by everything we know of the soul of Charlie in the Puppet. She's there to protect others since she realizes she is the only one (that she knows the extent of) that can. So the kind heart is the core, with every other body of each Charlie bot being their own kinds of Henry's stages of grief. And I believe they compile not just the memories but the feelings of every Charlie that comes later. It's one of the reasons why Teen Charlie is still kind and protective of others despite also having Henry's mental realizations as a sort of flaw. Because she has both the ragdoll and teenage body. The ragdoll having all the past experiences and kindness Henry recalls about Charlie, and the teenager Charlie bot who has the programming of a teenager who likes machines like her father (which i do think would be semi realistic for even soul Charlie if she grew because interests like that can be both passed down socially and genetically if they lean in logic based directions, artistic ones, or both), and the mental questioning that her father had in the point of creation that actually does match well with teenagers especially when dealing with trauma (even if the books treat her as weird for thinking which is a big flaw in the writing.) Something I don't think you give credit for is the fact that Henry did realize eventually he went mad. And that, for all intents and purposes the Charlie Bots WERE a bandaid to him. Yes, he shocks Charlie in Lefty, but he doesn't actually know how conscious his daughter is or how much of a threat she could be really, even if she has enough mental ability to help others and be generally aware, he doesn't know to what extent nor the extent of the others. For taking accountability in the games (or trying to at least), even if he was arrested or just stricken with grief into choice paralysis, Henry eventually came around. Also, the robot Henry made to kill himself was at least just an endo that he could have gotten from anywhere in the Graphic novels. So he only needed the programming and to fasten a knife really. Morally ditching his robot daughter ans son are bad, but his wife took intiative and left Henry. I'm sure Henry overall would have wanted her to stay even if it is an unhealthy coping mechanism she was seeing all the red flags for. The books you say make Henry out to be a patron of justice narratively, but it's clear they wouldn't do that. Baby herself says he was neglectful, it's clear his grief was from pure love but I don't think they fully excuse it either. And honestly I don't think Henry excused his actions considering he killed himself via robot. But he did run from his failures to cope. And Baby knows it was pure love for Charlie because Henry crying so hard at the memory of her is infintely more than William would give the Elizabeth in her. Also about Baby and why she's mad. 1: She's incomplete with no caring ragdoll inside so the anger and abandonment is the only thing she got from Henry, and she's given to William, an actual monster, with his neglected daughter who's dedicated to a lost cause that I think Baby knows is one but like any abused child is too attached to the thought of a good father like Henry was to wanting his living daughter back. It may be written poorly, but what they were going for is a narrative that does fit roughly what they were going for regardless of bonkers lore details or execution being subpar. I'm also under the impression that Henry not viewing the Charlie bot's future as important is something of note when paired with William's jealousy of Henry's creations having life. Because when Henry put his all into his work in the right state of mind, his works turned out great and vibrant like with the original Fredbear's and Freddy's bots. When he's not in his right mind, his creations reflect that. But I fear he never fully understood his own genius in making life. He knew how to mechanically make a living person after accidentally making a living doll from the memory of his daughter, but ultimately he never researched it all to a point where he could replicate the ragdoll, hence why it was the core. William didn't know either because he had no emotional attachments outside of either narcissism or borderline personality disorder. I say BPD because some Fazbear Frights stories kinda hint at William himself having poor home life and being bullied and not just Micheal or Elizabeth who themselves would have gotten the potential for similar tendencies with the power of the cycle of abuse. Like think about it... William is super obsessed with families and immortality. Fear of harm and death, the need to be shielded in a suit, the need for balance and the want to keep the missing kids in a wonderland or unaware even when making them kill. Finding kids similar to him (or his kids) to target who have some troubles like Susie with her dog or that kid from Dittophobia who he traps by saying his family didn't care about him but he was safe there. Movie William's speech in the movie while cornered. Bunny Call's MC Bob fearing he would be a bad father while protecting his family from what is essentially a Springtrap-esque character. William not wanting what is likely a Mike parallel in the baby (while Clara is an Adult Mike Parallel as seen in the Logbook.) Bob in Bunny call's kids being two older boys and a baby girl who is his favorite with a risky heart condition that could accidentally die from the Bunny Call happening (like Elizabeth maybe dying from Baby accidentally.) Yes, Eleanor is a being of Agony causing these things and many of Fright's events, but shadows feed on agony of others and take on many shapes. Why wouldn't the parallels of a victim in Fazbear Frights be devalued as something important just because Elanor orchestrated it? She probably has fed on stuff similar to the games' universe since a lot of stuff did still happen that happened in the games, or similarly to them. The pirate's curse on Pete could be Mike adjacent enough for Elanor to take action and feed off of more by recreating something tragic with a twist. To Be Beautiful is a dead wringer for an Elizabeth Parallel of feeling inadequate in the Tirlogy and games. So it does thematically connect even if a lot of this is poorly written goosebumps at the end of the day, and most of the stories are filler or feel like it. Sorry I was ranting lmao. Autism (and maybe ADHD since there's recent developments in my life making me want to get tested for that as well because of lots of symptoms adding up in my adult life for years that I never thought of as abnormal until Jaiden Animation's ADHD video so...) is probably the cause of every rant about this franchise.
7:29 Facts. The story is quite literally about Delilah being paranoid and being very dumb. And she died in a stupid way. Delilah is probably the most boring Fazbear Frights antagonist ever.
When watching the movie the first time I didn't knew Ella, so I freaking screamed "It's Baby!!" Few days later I was talking with some friends about it and felt like 🤡
I read the novelization - I don’t think they did any corrections to the novel version when the final script was used. I noticed a LOT of differences - also a good bit of detail and expanding on the “possible INTERESTS” between Mike and Vanessa. So I genuinely hope they don’t take this “Mike is an Afton that Henry rescued” arc with the trilogy…but yeah. Ella was described more like Baby in the novel.
Nice rundown of Ella! I'm glad I'm not the only one who found her usage throughout the books (and then later even moreso) confusing on some level. The amount of things she *almost* is and then isn't, is unusually long, and fairly rapid-fire. Like you said, as the reader we're meant to understand her as a bespoke doll, then a child vessel, then a smaller doll - then, just kidding actually that was a different doll - and I swear to God when I read the FF story with Eleanor I had to stop and scratch my head. I count that as another case of FNAF's plague of name re-usage, even if it's not one-to-one. In any other franchise, with any other author, the name Eleanor would have been a deliberate and meaningful nod to the prior character that pans out to signify something later on. But this is FNAF, baby.
Scott just said in the Dawko interview that he writes a few pages of the gist of the story and pays the author to flesh it out. Perhaps that wasn't money well spent with 1:35 am.
@@burner555 he addressed that too. He said he really regrets it now but at the time he thought it would be an interesting body horror type story (like ‘Alien’ chest burster maybe?) but he didn't step back and look at it to realise just how weird it was until it was too late.
I subscribe to the idea that 1.The books are crummy fazbear merchandise that the company produces to make the actual history surrounding the real events of fnaf out to be just another random horror story surrounding the brand and 2. The "rogue indi developer games" that are mentioned in help wanted are not one to one the same fnaf games we have IRL. There's too many inconsistencies if we try to use the games WE played as the same exact ones that are eluded to in universe. But, in reality, doesn't excuse the horrendous quality of many of these books and even going with the "crummy horror stories" idea for them they're exceptionally bad and kinda boring so they're just not worth considering as concrete lore. At most they can provide hints for some potential ideas, but generally many are just throw away horror schlock.
Finally someone who dares to critique at least one of the short stories. Most of them are poorly written. Just as if they were the first work of some college student or someone who makes their first steps at creative writing. I'm honestly so confused how nobody sees this.
Likely most of the people who know of the books have only read the first two or three, which are definitely the highest in quality. They miss how goofy some of the later stuff gets, like the guy who turns into a plastic sign. XD
"then he built a track and bolted down her old body into it so it could serve as one of her toys! While she was serving as his." no I'm not ok, that made me have a phisical reaction oh God. I hate the Dads in this franchise ;-;
With that thing in FNaF: The Movie: The Book, that makes 3 non-game instances where Ella is related to Baby. Novels: Ella is CharlieBot1, Baby is CharlieBot4 Frights: Ella is Elanore who is the Frights "not-Baby" Movie: Ella looks like Baby in the novelization. Scrap Baby does get mysterious roller skates, Ella has roller skates in some depictions [including the arcade cabinet]. Do we need the wheels to come from Ella? no, but it is another link, however nebulous.
At this point it could mean something or it could just be connected to the peculiar history of Circus Baby herself- like Eleanor looking like Circus Baby even though just not being her and being written in as the villain after Andrew and Afton were written out. Plus all the recent book cameos, it's... a thinker.
@@notrealnamenotatall2476You say Ella in 1:35 AM is nothing like in the books but there is one consistency that I realised when you put them next to each other. They're both stand ins for kids that the adult has lost in some way but eventually is tossed aside by them .
I really like your content and your videos + a few others are how I get my FNAF knowledge. Because of that, every once in a while I have to pause a video and think "The... hell is goin' on with this series?" This was one of those times. RIP Stanley tho he a real one fr
Hmm… fascinating, she seems to be a parallel to the PlushBabies, Scrap PlushBabies, Bidybabs, and Electrobabs from the games, one could even say her spiritual successor is Ballora due to both of them being mysterious, intelligent and aware anyways thanks for the video Nottie! 🐻❤️
Henry's madness mixed with his business personality. He(in the silver eyes)never wasted parts, so would never throw away a machine that could still serve a purpose. However if a machine failed to live up to it's intended purpose, he immediately salvaged it to make something else, a direct parallel to the Withereds in Fnaf 2. In the games the ONLY thing separating the puppet from the Withereds is being loved by customers. The Withereds became salvage because 'their out dated appearance scared customers.' with according to phone guy foxy being the last to suffer this fate. The puppet however was scary to staff and not children so she after possession got to stay whereas everthing from the 1983-85 era was relegated to being salvage, despite the best efforts of staff technicians to upgrade them to be standing beside the toys.
Having never read any of the books, I did wonder why they chose that design in the FNAF film since it looked so…not part of the setting (unsettling?), considering the rest of the animatronics are animal based and even Afton’s springlock is another animal, I was surprised they went with a doll based springlock in the film.
Fnaf has multiple timelines 3 at th moment Ella in the trilogy books universe was made as a vessel for Charlie, Ella in the games/ fazbear frights universe was a toy made by the company, Ella in the movie universe is a character is mainly made to be a slight reference to circus baby while also being a way of explaining the springlocks to new fans
12:14 Ella does sort of look like Circus Baby. That's actually the first place my brain went when you said she's depicted wearing roller-skates 0:54 aka shoes with wheels
I will agree that Ella not actually tormenting Delilah, but actually Eleanor, to me feels redundant for Ella. I also agree that Ella in Security Breach is just a cameo, not something for lore and such.
Welp, I did not expect my opinion of Henry (in the books) to worsen even more, but apparently the world is full of surprises! Like damn, that's quite messed up. Anyways, great vid as always, really instructive, and yeah, that's a quite odd 'character', that's pretty neat!
what's weird to me about Ella's relatively common use is that she doesn't look like a fnaf character. I don't see her and think oh yeah obviously that's fnaf
Since the series is now 10 years old and a racing game and the joy of creation coming in 2025 i can't wait until then otherwise your content is great ❤
10:10 the way I’ve always seen is the arcades are the urban legends of Freddy’s, the story’s prior to the plex. I think it’s more likely the Fazbear frights are these and thus Ella in that way would be something that exist and her story is a game, a very stupid very boring game
I swear I remember a book scene where Ella was picked up by Carlton and Jon where the doll said something about Henry, its a lot of layers of weird with her story.
1:35 am’s Delilah seeing Ella as her unborn child parallels Henry seeing her as his lost daughter and they both throw her away when they don’t see her value anymore, Delilah is haunted by her and goes insane, which is what Charlie’s aunt says about Henry, he went mad
I think what's going on here is that after Henry's death, Fazbear Entertainment most likely investigated his house for animatronic parts. They then found Ella and decided to mass produce her for revenue.
This is a random thing I remembered when hearing about Henry’s stab bot. That was really dumb, especially since theres another way for him to get the whole “killed by his creation” thing. He should have been golden Freddy. I know the novels already had one, but let’s be real, who remembers or cares about Mike #3. I think Henry should have springlocked himself and become golden Freddy.
Hote take: Ella have a so much potential as plot twist character which( clearly refrence to) Baby dont even get but she really deserve better in the lore, not just character that Steelwool isnt even sure if they want tp add her or...maybe her plushies its really seems odd for me that we have so much refrences of her, and yet she isnt even impotant...
Irony is that Henry lost his marriage, his son and his wife, and his mind all for a doll that he ends up throwing to the sides. Jesus Christ FNAF at this point make Henry a villain and get William out of the villain spot for once
6:37 -You dare do a creepy living doll made by a madman video AND show imagry from American Mcgee's Alice but DON'T show the insane children or dollmaker stuff?! How dare you..
I don't always agree with your FNAF takes but I agree so much about 1:30 AM being boring, I felt so vindicated during that part of the video lmao. It felt like the writer was struggling to come up with a story with the prompt Scott Cawthon gave them
I remember watching the movie with my gf and her dad, I instantly recognized Ella, but then was immediately hit with confusion due to her being a springlock, since she's a doll and all (and then, similarly to that, being very confused about the purple suit that Max was in)
I do think Ella was swapped late with CB in the movie production. And I'll admit when we went to see the movie with our partner we both thought it was supposed to be Circus Baby, which would make sense given that Abby is a parallel to Elizabeth, being Mikes younger sister and all
Although I'm not afraid of dolls, this thing looks a little off-putting. Also- BUH WHA, Ella was a body for Charlie? Okay, I actually like that twist! Still don't know how that translated to a spring lock suit in the film, odd to say the least. Edit: You suffered from sleep paralysis? I've never had that happen to me. Must be terrifying.
@@notrealnamenotatall2476 Oh wow, I've had really bad nightmares but never felt like I was lying in bed being unable to move, I didn't even know those could happen without hallucinations. 🫣
i just realized that Rocket from the walten files is definitely based off the similar Theodore! also will you ever cover the walten files? I highly recommend it bc it’s story is cool and actually thought out.
i THINK I KNOW WHY IT WAS ELLA NOT BABY IN THE MOVIE! (redacted character) IS the charlie of this story in all technicality! So of course it would be ella! This could mean a certain security guard has a toy of a circus clown girl
The movie has been out for months, I don't know what's stopping you from talking about spoilers, especially when you have made videos detailing the events of new games pretty quickly. Hell, I bet you have more subscribers that have seen the film than played any of the games
I don't know if it was already mentioned in the comments, but every major iteration of Ella is somehow related to Circus Baby: In the trilogy she used to be younger Charlie while adult charlie became Circus Baby. In Fazbear Frights Ella was a medium Eleanor (the lanky Circus Baby) used to Torment the woman from the story. In the movie not only she seems to replace CB as a torture animatronic, but also (spoilers) the one who was going to be put inside of her is named Abby (switch first two letters to get Baby) who also might be movieverse's standin for Elisabeth (the girl who in the game is posessing CB).
Ella is an odd character to say the least she doesn’t have much fleshing out in the way of character but gets more attention than most characters (eg:plush trap). All started from just that one appearance in the silver eyes.
The FNAF short stories being repetitious and having rndings that are just "And then they died, the end" is a seemingly common problem, with the first 5 stories of TFTPP (all I've read) all following that same formula, I only liked Frailty, since there's an actual plot and a mystery to keep things interesting. I know horror means bad endings, but that doesn't excuse cheating the reader out of a proper resolution or an ending twist. Happy endings work because defeating the big bad enemy thing is the resolution to the build up, it's the answer to the question of the story, without anything like that the stories seem pointless. And as I've said I like frailty, which has a sad ending since it has a proper resolution, question of the story was answered.
I feel like Ella is a case of wanting to expand on the lore and/or taking something small and trying to make it more than it really needs to be, but not really knowing how, and as a result they end up being such a non-character.
I feel like the story might have been trying to communicate a boring mundane routine but they definitely didn’t nail it. It’s a little tricky to get down if only ever seen it done well a couple times like that “My phone was on the counter” creepypasta
movie bella got the biggest rise out of me in the first watch. i think it's because she wasn't baby, was a spring lock and an interesting pull. it's good they saved baby for, i'm sure, her big movie reveal.
12:57 I feel like Ella works here because in the silver eyes isn’t circus baby also connected to Ella? Elizabeth and Charlie are connected to Ella because of the whole body thing and all that, blah blah. So it could totally work as a replacement since Abby is supposed to be the movies version of Elizabeth.
Perhaps, though Circus Baby is only connected to Ella in the Silver Eyes because Fourth Charlie was made into Circus Baby by William and possessed by Elizabeth- though after she already had awareness of her own. It would kind of be a stretch, but possible.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
5:42 I liked that line so much I said it twice. XD Jokes aside, this was me accidentally leaving in a second take and not picking it up until now. Since removing it would require retiming the entire video, I'mma just leave it in. Sorry about that!
I love you notrealname notatall
aw shucks
2 hours ahead
Oh….I had thought I had finally achieved time travel for a second.
You know, if Steel Wool Studios, or any other developer behind the FNAF franchise decides to use Ella for something instead of just her being there, then I'm ok with greet it with open arms
Then again, we could have a Mimic situation and I don't want that, but who freaking knows
What if ALL of the Charlie-bots have secret features.
Ella is an alarm clock, Circus Baby is a jukebox and teenage Charlie? Microwave oven.
@@casualcommenter7152 Child Charlie?
@@captainet2457Filing Cabinet.
@@casualcommenter7152You jest, but isn't that unironically that freaky egg thing in Pizza Sim?
😱@@Birdsflight44
Naw, teenage Charlie is definitely a BBQ grill
Ella, a random doll Charlotte owned as a kid was apparently SO important, that she not only was the whole reason robot Charlie existed, was referenced in a book, and appeared in the Fnaf Movie. A random toy of Charlotte get more continuity than her own twin brother.
@@Marionette3744 I’m wheezing. 😭
It's extremely sad but true 💀
It always seemed odd to me that Afton was so scared of hearing Sammy's name in the twisted ones novel. It made him go sombre and tell all his Fredbear's secrets during a confrontation with Charlie. I mean okay his arm was pinned by a spike but he DIDN'T HAVE to tell Charlie the truth about what happened at Fredbear's he could've just done a runner early, saying nothing.
For real life that's is so awesome and cool
I mean I didn't care about sammy
Honestly, it makes sense that Ella's just used as a "vessel" however she needs to be, story-wise. She's a doll- a toy that acts as a storytelling vessel. They are what they need to be at that moment.
You know, that's actually kinda genius-
My head-canon is that Ella happens to be possessed by the spirit of a little girl. But she just chooses to stand still and do nothing, and she's just as confused as us.
*looks at the doll bolted to the floor* could you not please
@waggieentertainment9387 Well, if you bolt her to the floor, (⚓️⬇️) then she won't even have the choice to move. Other than un-possesing (hopefully).
🤣
So just like William, she always comes back
Ella is the true Mrs. Afton
Ella is basically a mask, a shell for whoever’s will she is being used by. From Henry’s weird dysfunctional grief healing, to Elenor’s torment of a depressed girl, and even Afton’s murder nonsense.
It would have been more appropriate to bury Charlie's toddler body. Just putting her in the closet, it just feels like she's just another item to be stored away forever in storage.
Ella can be like a disturbed Toy Story character. Toy Story 1 was originally pretty grim, especially with Woody straight up killing Buzz and being a complete dick to everyone.
My headcannon for the movie is that William built a spring Ella to torment Henry
The real tragedy of 1:35 AM is she keeps going to people she trusts and expresses how shes having a breakdown and how it happens at the same time each night and asks for help. And every time they say its okay, theyre here for her. Then every time 1:35 rolls around they act confused and hostile when she has a panic attack and tell her to get lost. She tried so hard to reach out and was isolated at every turn. Do thats why the story always stood out to me. Also the ending sickeningly reminded me of Eliza Lam who likely had that paranoid episode before climbing into someplace she got stuck and died.
11:24 talk about a glow up! From a doll, an alarm clock to a Springlock suit which had relevance in the lore.
I always assumed that, in the Silver Eyes trilogy, the adult Charlie bot that eventually became Circus Baby was built first, not because of any weirdness on Henry's part, for once, but because of limitations of the technology. That's part of why it was wrong and he lashed out at it in anger, flooding it with agony and making it alive-ish. That's also why both Ella!Charlie and Circus Baby use the illusion disks, but kid and teen Charlie don't seem to, Henry's obsession with improvement, with making the bodies he gave his daughter more realistic, more able to allow the remains of her in the original doll to live.
That doesn't make Henry's whole thing any less weird, but an assumed drive to improve the next iteration of the Charlie bot might also help explain why he was so willing to discard them once he/Charlie/whatever was done with them. The robot bodies were never Charlie to him, just a case for her, it was the original cheap mass manufactured doll that he locked onto Charlie's soul being attached to. So the robot bodies were just as disposable as that animatronic frog doll that he traumatized one of the Charlies with.
Ella has such a beautiful design. It's a shame that she was never utilized to her fullest potential.
Ella was such an interesting character to me, i don't know, theres just something so terrifyingly great about her. She just feels like an important piece to the lore.
6:58 She should have just kept Ella around as a decoration instead of discarding her because her alarm clock function failed. The story about the doll just feels like some lady getting too obsessed with a stupid doll. Is Ella supposed to be like Tomie from Junji Ito's Tomie; a teenage girl that keeps coming back, only to be murdered by some obsessed crazed males? "The Boy" is probably a good scare to read instead of this, even though it's depressing and just left me furious at Tomie for grooming the titular boy that found her resurrected body on a beach.
what a good shout.
NotReal would probs love Tomie and the more popular Junji Ito books generally- they have that twisted, semi-campy, almost funny horror she seems to respond to well. I love more Uzumaki chapters than Tomie, but the Tomie bits i love most go way harder honestly. I cheer for a shocking amount of murders she does without ever being completely on side. She’s absolutely malicious but so are the men she encounters so like.. screw those guys, they suck
Ella, from weird doll, to vessel for Henry's memories of grief, to vessel for Eleanor's things, to attempted vessel for Abby. She's just so weird. She's only used, as you said, as a plot tool. And that's basically her personality, being a tool for other character's to use the way they want (mainly to remember a child they lost or to be controlled by another entity).
RIP Stanley the Unicorn, or rather "uglicorn" I guess (not very nice of you Charlie)
This is what I really don’t like about Henry ending his life it feels like an excuse to ignore the consequences of his actions. and it’s just strange how the newer Fnaf games are terrified of even mentioning blood meanwhile a man build a robot to hurt himself In the goriest way possible
I agree. Security Breach was rated T, and they censored words like "kill" and "blood" while also taking away Vanny's knife. Meanwhile, some of the books are so over the top gory that it's not even scary. It's just gross. There's only so many times you can describe someone getting mutilated in graphic detail before the shock value is lost.
To me, it just shows us how horribly inconsistent this series really is.
His suicide in the books was about his mind collapsing from the grief of Charlie's death. In the games it was more about helping others than him being there at all. He says in the insanity ending in politely censored words that he could've killed himself at any point in the games, but resolve stopped him, in direct contrast to the books. He planned for all that time to just fight Afton using his own tricks and that has to be worth something. He did it all to make sure the children had someone in their corner, he didn't care what happened to him, if a Fnaf world cutscene/possible teaser could actually be believed he may have been killed by scrap Baby so never committed suicide in the games, and that in itself would open many cans of worms so to speak.
Really sad how the franchise has become so watered down and honestly generic @@giovannisoto4353
The Ella doll always reminded me of those dolls from the movie “Child’s Play”
I love how you've used Comic Charlie as an avatar for your perpetual FNAF ennui.
I *really* want to see some kind of "Abridged" version of the character, and I feel like the Ella/Charlie dynamic in particular has so much parody potential.
Not sure how one could achieve that kind of "abridged" presentation without actual footage, but you get my point, the vibes are there
Considering how Tales of the Pizzaplex has characters naming mainline FNaF games and acknowledge William Afton as Springtrap in-universe, it wouldn't at all surprise me that the original novel trilogy most likely does also exist in-universe in some form. This wouldn't be the first time the FNaF series has done some meta stuff that end up being canon.
Is that the bite.. I mean, the mimic?!?!
So something I realized after remembering the graphic novel version (I keep forgetting to read the proper novel trilogy so I don't know if it's touched on) is that the ragdoll Henry cried into with the memory of Charlie was her core for a reason. What does Henry remember of Charlie in FNaF 6? A kindhearted girl who would not be content to have people suffering. Which is true, by everything we know of the soul of Charlie in the Puppet. She's there to protect others since she realizes she is the only one (that she knows the extent of) that can. So the kind heart is the core, with every other body of each Charlie bot being their own kinds of Henry's stages of grief. And I believe they compile not just the memories but the feelings of every Charlie that comes later. It's one of the reasons why Teen Charlie is still kind and protective of others despite also having Henry's mental realizations as a sort of flaw. Because she has both the ragdoll and teenage body. The ragdoll having all the past experiences and kindness Henry recalls about Charlie, and the teenager Charlie bot who has the programming of a teenager who likes machines like her father (which i do think would be semi realistic for even soul Charlie if she grew because interests like that can be both passed down socially and genetically if they lean in logic based directions, artistic ones, or both), and the mental questioning that her father had in the point of creation that actually does match well with teenagers especially when dealing with trauma (even if the books treat her as weird for thinking which is a big flaw in the writing.) Something I don't think you give credit for is the fact that Henry did realize eventually he went mad. And that, for all intents and purposes the Charlie Bots WERE a bandaid to him. Yes, he shocks Charlie in Lefty, but he doesn't actually know how conscious his daughter is or how much of a threat she could be really, even if she has enough mental ability to help others and be generally aware, he doesn't know to what extent nor the extent of the others. For taking accountability in the games (or trying to at least), even if he was arrested or just stricken with grief into choice paralysis, Henry eventually came around. Also, the robot Henry made to kill himself was at least just an endo that he could have gotten from anywhere in the Graphic novels. So he only needed the programming and to fasten a knife really. Morally ditching his robot daughter ans son are bad, but his wife took intiative and left Henry. I'm sure Henry overall would have wanted her to stay even if it is an unhealthy coping mechanism she was seeing all the red flags for. The books you say make Henry out to be a patron of justice narratively, but it's clear they wouldn't do that. Baby herself says he was neglectful, it's clear his grief was from pure love but I don't think they fully excuse it either. And honestly I don't think Henry excused his actions considering he killed himself via robot. But he did run from his failures to cope. And Baby knows it was pure love for Charlie because Henry crying so hard at the memory of her is infintely more than William would give the Elizabeth in her. Also about Baby and why she's mad. 1: She's incomplete with no caring ragdoll inside so the anger and abandonment is the only thing she got from Henry, and she's given to William, an actual monster, with his neglected daughter who's dedicated to a lost cause that I think Baby knows is one but like any abused child is too attached to the thought of a good father like Henry was to wanting his living daughter back. It may be written poorly, but what they were going for is a narrative that does fit roughly what they were going for regardless of bonkers lore details or execution being subpar. I'm also under the impression that Henry not viewing the Charlie bot's future as important is something of note when paired with William's jealousy of Henry's creations having life. Because when Henry put his all into his work in the right state of mind, his works turned out great and vibrant like with the original Fredbear's and Freddy's bots. When he's not in his right mind, his creations reflect that. But I fear he never fully understood his own genius in making life. He knew how to mechanically make a living person after accidentally making a living doll from the memory of his daughter, but ultimately he never researched it all to a point where he could replicate the ragdoll, hence why it was the core. William didn't know either because he had no emotional attachments outside of either narcissism or borderline personality disorder. I say BPD because some Fazbear Frights stories kinda hint at William himself having poor home life and being bullied and not just Micheal or Elizabeth who themselves would have gotten the potential for similar tendencies with the power of the cycle of abuse. Like think about it... William is super obsessed with families and immortality. Fear of harm and death, the need to be shielded in a suit, the need for balance and the want to keep the missing kids in a wonderland or unaware even when making them kill. Finding kids similar to him (or his kids) to target who have some troubles like Susie with her dog or that kid from Dittophobia who he traps by saying his family didn't care about him but he was safe there. Movie William's speech in the movie while cornered. Bunny Call's MC Bob fearing he would be a bad father while protecting his family from what is essentially a Springtrap-esque character. William not wanting what is likely a Mike parallel in the baby (while Clara is an Adult Mike Parallel as seen in the Logbook.) Bob in Bunny call's kids being two older boys and a baby girl who is his favorite with a risky heart condition that could accidentally die from the Bunny Call happening (like Elizabeth maybe dying from Baby accidentally.) Yes, Eleanor is a being of Agony causing these things and many of Fright's events, but shadows feed on agony of others and take on many shapes. Why wouldn't the parallels of a victim in Fazbear Frights be devalued as something important just because Elanor orchestrated it? She probably has fed on stuff similar to the games' universe since a lot of stuff did still happen that happened in the games, or similarly to them. The pirate's curse on Pete could be Mike adjacent enough for Elanor to take action and feed off of more by recreating something tragic with a twist. To Be Beautiful is a dead wringer for an Elizabeth Parallel of feeling inadequate in the Tirlogy and games. So it does thematically connect even if a lot of this is poorly written goosebumps at the end of the day, and most of the stories are filler or feel like it.
Sorry I was ranting lmao. Autism (and maybe ADHD since there's recent developments in my life making me want to get tested for that as well because of lots of symptoms adding up in my adult life for years that I never thought of as abnormal until Jaiden Animation's ADHD video so...) is probably the cause of every rant about this franchise.
7:29 Facts. The story is quite literally about Delilah being paranoid and being very dumb. And she died in a stupid way. Delilah is probably the most boring Fazbear Frights antagonist ever.
12:40 Fun fact, in an apperantly R rated draft, ella didn't have springlocks but rather a claw-like mechanism in her chest.
Dolls, am I right?
Yeah Tell me about it
lol, reminds me of the song “Dolls” from Bella Poarch
Reminds me of the ones from small soldiers.
When watching the movie the first time I didn't knew Ella, so I freaking screamed "It's Baby!!"
Few days later I was talking with some friends about it and felt like 🤡
I read the novelization - I don’t think they did any corrections to the novel version when the final script was used. I noticed a LOT of differences - also a good bit of detail and expanding on the “possible INTERESTS” between Mike and Vanessa. So I genuinely hope they don’t take this “Mike is an Afton that Henry rescued” arc with the trilogy…but yeah. Ella was described more like Baby in the novel.
Nice rundown of Ella! I'm glad I'm not the only one who found her usage throughout the books (and then later even moreso) confusing on some level. The amount of things she *almost* is and then isn't, is unusually long, and fairly rapid-fire. Like you said, as the reader we're meant to understand her as a bespoke doll, then a child vessel, then a smaller doll - then, just kidding actually that was a different doll - and I swear to God when I read the FF story with Eleanor I had to stop and scratch my head. I count that as another case of FNAF's plague of name re-usage, even if it's not one-to-one. In any other franchise, with any other author, the name Eleanor would have been a deliberate and meaningful nod to the prior character that pans out to signify something later on. But this is FNAF, baby.
Scott just said in the Dawko interview that he writes a few pages of the gist of the story and pays the author to flesh it out.
Perhaps that wasn't money well spent with 1:35 am.
Wtf went in Scott's mind when he made "In the Flesh"
@@burner555 he addressed that too.
He said he really regrets it now but at the time he thought it would be an interesting body horror type story (like ‘Alien’ chest burster maybe?) but he didn't step back and look at it to realise just how weird it was until it was too late.
Justice for my boy Stanley! He needs some lore relevance!
Ella getting a cameo in the movie is... something.
As someone named Ella who has curly brown hair (albeit significantly darker than the doll’s), I absolutely get a kick out of being in FNAF
An empty doll? I can relate.
Completely forgot about Ella, thanks your reminding me of her
oh yeahh post depression nap to immediately seeing my favorite youtuber uploaded, what an absolute win
I subscribe to the idea that 1.The books are crummy fazbear merchandise that the company produces to make the actual history surrounding the real events of fnaf out to be just another random horror story surrounding the brand and 2. The "rogue indi developer games" that are mentioned in help wanted are not one to one the same fnaf games we have IRL. There's too many inconsistencies if we try to use the games WE played as the same exact ones that are eluded to in universe.
But, in reality, doesn't excuse the horrendous quality of many of these books and even going with the "crummy horror stories" idea for them they're exceptionally bad and kinda boring so they're just not worth considering as concrete lore. At most they can provide hints for some potential ideas, but generally many are just throw away horror schlock.
Finally someone who dares to critique at least one of the short stories. Most of them are poorly written. Just as if they were the first work of some college student or someone who makes their first steps at creative writing. I'm honestly so confused how nobody sees this.
Likely most of the people who know of the books have only read the first two or three, which are definitely the highest in quality. They miss how goofy some of the later stuff gets, like the guy who turns into a plastic sign. XD
"then he built a track and bolted down her old body into it so it could serve as one of her toys! While she was serving as his." no I'm not ok, that made me have a phisical reaction oh God.
I hate the Dads in this franchise ;-;
With that thing in FNaF: The Movie: The Book, that makes 3 non-game instances where Ella is related to Baby.
Novels: Ella is CharlieBot1, Baby is CharlieBot4
Frights: Ella is Elanore who is the Frights "not-Baby"
Movie: Ella looks like Baby in the novelization.
Scrap Baby does get mysterious roller skates, Ella has roller skates in some depictions [including the arcade cabinet]. Do we need the wheels to come from Ella? no, but it is another link, however nebulous.
At this point it could mean something or it could just be connected to the peculiar history of Circus Baby herself- like Eleanor looking like Circus Baby even though just not being her and being written in as the villain after Andrew and Afton were written out. Plus all the recent book cameos, it's... a thinker.
As soon as i saw ella in the fnaf movie i figured she was gonna be that continuity's baby. I love that the book's draft pretty much confirms that.
2:14 I thought Stanley was a unicorn
He is. I correct it later. XD
@@notrealnamenotatall2476 maybe, he’ll get his own appearance in the new choose your own adventure book..
@@notrealnamenotatall2476You say Ella in 1:35 AM is nothing like in the books but there is one consistency that I realised when you put them next to each other. They're both stand ins for kids that the adult has lost in some way but eventually is tossed aside by them .
unicorns are fancy horses
@@cheesebatto Narwal horses
well, I know a song named "Ella"...^^
Stanley is such a fun design, I hope we get a canon version in a future game. Just imagine a carnival ride with the Stanley.
6:07 what in the Little Nightmares is that?!
8:06 also is Bendy actually your sleep paralysis demon? Lol
I really like your content and your videos + a few others are how I get my FNAF knowledge. Because of that, every once in a while I have to pause a video and think "The... hell is goin' on with this series?"
This was one of those times.
RIP Stanley tho he a real one fr
Hmm… fascinating, she seems to be a parallel to the PlushBabies, Scrap PlushBabies, Bidybabs, and Electrobabs from the games, one could even say her spiritual successor is Ballora due to both of them being mysterious, intelligent and aware anyways thanks for the video Nottie! 🐻❤️
Henry's madness mixed with his business personality. He(in the silver eyes)never wasted parts, so would never throw away a machine that could still serve a purpose. However if a machine failed to live up to it's intended purpose, he immediately salvaged it to make something else, a direct parallel to the Withereds in Fnaf 2. In the games the ONLY thing separating the puppet from the Withereds is being loved by customers. The Withereds became salvage because 'their out dated appearance scared customers.' with according to phone guy foxy being the last to suffer this fate. The puppet however was scary to staff and not children so she after possession got to stay whereas everthing from the 1983-85 era was relegated to being salvage, despite the best efforts of staff technicians to upgrade them to be standing beside the toys.
Consider this: Ella, an inanimate object, has more screentime and development than Ennard, Monty, and Vanny combined.
Ella is just a prop willing to be used in whatever crazy scenario that Scott Cooks up
10:59 yes same with the Fazbear Frights book and Tales books
Made to discredit real events by shoving in a bunch of fake events like Fazgoo
This reminds me that 1:35 am is the scariest story
How did this series go from child murder and dark stuff to agony demons and shape shifting robots?
Having never read any of the books, I did wonder why they chose that design in the FNAF film since it looked so…not part of the setting (unsettling?), considering the rest of the animatronics are animal based and even Afton’s springlock is another animal, I was surprised they went with a doll based springlock in the film.
Fnaf has multiple timelines 3 at th moment
Ella in the trilogy books universe was made as a vessel for Charlie, Ella in the games/ fazbear frights universe was a toy made by the company, Ella in the movie universe is a character is mainly made to be a slight reference to circus baby while also being a way of explaining the springlocks to new fans
12:14 Ella does sort of look like Circus Baby. That's actually the first place my brain went when you said she's depicted wearing roller-skates 0:54 aka shoes with wheels
two minutes ago is crazy
"But that he could shut off attachment so easily"
*Sammy somewhere else crying the red lake out of neglect*
6:32 Centaurworld! What a fun show
I will agree that Ella not actually tormenting Delilah, but actually Eleanor, to me feels redundant for Ella. I also agree that Ella in Security Breach is just a cameo, not something for lore and such.
Welp, I did not expect my opinion of Henry (in the books) to worsen even more, but apparently the world is full of surprises!
Like damn, that's quite messed up.
Anyways, great vid as always, really instructive, and yeah, that's a quite odd 'character', that's pretty neat!
what's weird to me about Ella's relatively common use is that she doesn't look like a fnaf character. I don't see her and think oh yeah obviously that's fnaf
Since the series is now 10 years old and a racing game and the joy of creation coming in 2025 i can't wait until then otherwise your content is great ❤
10:10 the way I’ve always seen is the arcades are the urban legends of Freddy’s, the story’s prior to the plex. I think it’s more likely the Fazbear frights are these and thus Ella in that way would be something that exist and her story is a game, a very stupid very boring game
I swear I remember a book scene where Ella was picked up by Carlton and Jon where the doll said something about Henry, its a lot of layers of weird with her story.
Ella is like the Tinkerbell of FNAF; she is reused a lot, but gets shafted and ignored just as frequently.
1:35 am’s Delilah seeing Ella as her unborn child parallels Henry seeing her as his lost daughter and they both throw her away when they don’t see her value anymore, Delilah is haunted by her and goes insane, which is what Charlie’s aunt says about Henry, he went mad
I think what's going on here is that after Henry's death, Fazbear Entertainment most likely investigated his house for animatronic parts. They then found Ella and decided to mass produce her for revenue.
This is a random thing I remembered when hearing about Henry’s stab bot.
That was really dumb, especially since theres another way for him to get the whole “killed by his creation” thing. He should have been golden Freddy. I know the novels already had one, but let’s be real, who remembers or cares about Mike #3. I think Henry should have springlocked himself and become golden Freddy.
8:02 That sleep paralysis demon looks awfully familiar... Where have I seen it before? Hmm.... Eh, it'll come to me eventually.... maybe.
Just wait, Ella will become the new big bad of the franchise and be revealed to be every previous character, including Toy Freddy!
Hote take: Ella have a so much potential as plot twist character which( clearly refrence to) Baby dont even get but she really deserve better in the lore, not just character that Steelwool isnt even sure if they want tp add her or...maybe her plushies its really seems odd for me that we have so much refrences of her, and yet she isnt even impotant...
Irony is that Henry lost his marriage, his son and his wife, and his mind all for a doll that he ends up throwing to the sides. Jesus Christ FNAF at this point make Henry a villain and get William out of the villain spot for once
6:37 -You dare do a creepy living doll made by a madman video AND show imagry from American Mcgee's Alice but DON'T show the insane children or dollmaker stuff?! How dare you..
I don't always agree with your FNAF takes but I agree so much about 1:30 AM being boring, I felt so vindicated during that part of the video lmao. It felt like the writer was struggling to come up with a story with the prompt Scott Cawthon gave them
I remember watching the movie with my gf and her dad, I instantly recognized Ella, but then was immediately hit with confusion due to her being a springlock, since she's a doll and all (and then, similarly to that, being very confused about the purple suit that Max was in)
I do think Ella was swapped late with CB in the movie production. And I'll admit when we went to see the movie with our partner we both thought it was supposed to be Circus Baby, which would make sense given that Abby is a parallel to Elizabeth, being Mikes younger sister and all
Although I'm not afraid of dolls, this thing looks a little off-putting. Also- BUH WHA, Ella was a body for Charlie? Okay, I actually like that twist! Still don't know how that translated to a spring lock suit in the film, odd to say the least.
Edit: You suffered from sleep paralysis? I've never had that happen to me. Must be terrifying.
Yeah, it's crazy! I get it a few times a month. I don't actually get hallucinations or anything, I just wake up unable to move. >.
@@notrealnamenotatall2476 Oh wow, I've had really bad nightmares but never felt like I was lying in bed being unable to move, I didn't even know those could happen without hallucinations. 🫣
i just realized that Rocket from the walten files is definitely based off the similar Theodore! also will you ever cover the walten files? I highly recommend it bc it’s story is cool and actually thought out.
"i always come back" -Ella-
i THINK I KNOW WHY IT WAS ELLA NOT BABY IN THE MOVIE!
(redacted character) IS the charlie of this story in all technicality! So of course it would be ella!
This could mean a certain security guard has a toy of a circus clown girl
Yeah with Henry treating Ella like this, I saw the story dubbed on you tube, but I never thought about that.
What if 1:35 AM Ella is just child Charlie as an Ella form? She doesn’t look that big or small so, it can work.
Makes more sense than the “it was Eleanore all along” twist.
The movie has been out for months, I don't know what's stopping you from talking about spoilers, especially when you have made videos detailing the events of new games pretty quickly. Hell, I bet you have more subscribers that have seen the film than played any of the games
CAN YOU PLEASE TALK ABOUT THE POTENTIAL KILLERS, SURVIVORS, AND MAPS FOR THE DBD COLLAB?!??
I don't know if it was already mentioned in the comments, but every major iteration of Ella is somehow related to Circus Baby:
In the trilogy she used to be younger Charlie while adult charlie became Circus Baby.
In Fazbear Frights Ella was a medium Eleanor (the lanky Circus Baby) used to Torment the woman from the story.
In the movie not only she seems to replace CB as a torture animatronic, but also (spoilers) the one who was going to be put inside of her is named Abby (switch first two letters to get Baby) who also might be movieverse's standin for Elisabeth (the girl who in the game is posessing CB).
Ella is an odd character to say the least she doesn’t have much fleshing out in the way of character but gets more attention than most characters (eg:plush trap). All started from just that one appearance in the silver eyes.
The FNAF short stories being repetitious and having rndings that are just "And then they died, the end" is a seemingly common problem, with the first 5 stories of TFTPP (all I've read) all following that same formula, I only liked Frailty, since there's an actual plot and a mystery to keep things interesting.
I know horror means bad endings, but that doesn't excuse cheating the reader out of a proper resolution or an ending twist.
Happy endings work because defeating the big bad enemy thing is the resolution to the build up, it's the answer to the question of the story, without anything like that the stories seem pointless. And as I've said I like frailty, which has a sad ending since it has a proper resolution, question of the story was answered.
How fitting I woke at 4 am, an hour befor my alarm clock should go
8:49 5:18 6:10 7:59 and 12:24 are the best image/moment
I feel like Ella is a case of wanting to expand on the lore and/or taking something small and trying to make it more than it really needs to be, but not really knowing how, and as a result they end up being such a non-character.
6:05 Ew, what the heck?! That CURSE! It reminds me of my sister’s doll that we named Baby JoJo, and had RED TEETH😂
Holy Smokes, I’m here early. Cool Video Notreal try to break down El Chip
I did! 8D It's called "El Chip: Forgotten to Fiesta"!
@@notrealnamenotatall2476 Sorry. I’m losing track of the animatronics you’ve done. I’m gonna go binge watch them all. Thanks
I love Ella and I’m glad she getting a video!
I feel like the story might have been trying to communicate a boring mundane routine but they definitely didn’t nail it. It’s a little tricky to get down if only ever seen it done well a couple times like that “My phone was on the counter” creepypasta
another day of asking you to watch the dual process theory video that revolutionized the fandom
Eh, I would prefer not to. I commend them for their video! But I like to just do my own thing and have my own opinions.
movie bella got the biggest rise out of me in the first watch. i think it's because she wasn't baby, was a spring lock and an interesting pull. it's good they saved baby for, i'm sure, her big movie reveal.
ella on 1:35 am also have andrew's agony, not just eleanor tormenting the woman
@@Wizardjones69 Yeah, from TMIR1280
If this turns into Eleanor I'm gonna lose my shit
I'm at my limit
12:57 I feel like Ella works here because in the silver eyes isn’t circus baby also connected to Ella? Elizabeth and Charlie are connected to Ella because of the whole body thing and all that, blah blah. So it could totally work as a replacement since Abby is supposed to be the movies version of Elizabeth.
Perhaps, though Circus Baby is only connected to Ella in the Silver Eyes because Fourth Charlie was made into Circus Baby by William and possessed by Elizabeth- though after she already had awareness of her own. It would kind of be a stretch, but possible.