This video is literally the best... I noticed how you really threaded the waters and was really careful with your words when you started to reference Zimmerman V. Trayvon Case!.
You can even charged on double liability. For example when you steal some else shirt. You can be charged for theft in criminal cases and held reliable in a civil wrong for plaintiff recover the shirt.
With regards to OJ in a criminal case, there is no place for emotions. In the civil case it still doesn't make sense to find someone who was acquitted criminally, yet find them liable.
How can a murder case be "business" related? How can say, OJ be found not guilty in criminal court yet have to pay money to the opposition's family if there are NO businesses involved?
Guilty = with malice. Without malice (intent) there is no crime, only a civil case. Example, you ran over a lady in your car, if there was no malice and it was strictly an accident, then no crime, but if you did it on purpose (with malice) then either murder or attempted murder. Also, in Indiana (probably the same everywhere) the rules of court (that take precedent over code) does not allow for any criminal actions, but only criminal proceedings. There is only one form of action, the civil action. The civil rules, also known as the rules of trial procedure, also apply to criminal proceeding, in so much as they do not conflict with the rules of criminal procedure. The only form of action does not conflict with the criminal rules. So it seems, all crimes are civil actions and the answers available in the civil rules all apply.
But isnt there always a possibility of someone masking their malice and just using the excuse of it being an accident or is would there be a substantial amount of evidence that can help determine whether there was malice or no malice without the need of the defendant confessing to anything. ( im new to this so if u could explain it that would be helpful thank u)
It seems like civil lawsuits are a backdoor just in case the criminal prosecutions dont work out. I always wondered how is that constitutional. Seems like another variation of _"double jeopardy,"_ imho.
Guilt can't get the only determinant of criminal law breaking. An illegal immigrant that hops across U.S. boarders and runs across is obviously 100% guilty. Yet they are not charged criminally.
You do realize that there are costs incurred with prosecutions and jailings right? Deportation is the cheapest and most practical tool when dealing with illegal immigration.
Wonderful explanation. I guess that in addition to money that one can be liable for in a civil case, it could could also mean possession of kids right? as in family courts
hey i'm a bit confused.. I thought in the US there is no civil law like in EU but there's common law. This does not seem to be the case since you're teaching about civil law in US?
I'm still super confused. If I murder someone, doesn't that mean that I'm technically liable for their murder? Since defamation is a civil law, how do does defamation mean i need to pay money?
Defamation, look @ you tube, Johnny Depp trial happening now…. Airing of dirty laundry that has now become synonymous with Depp’s formerly good name. 😢
I disagree with you. Criminal cases are Civil Cases because the Plaintiff is the "State". Since the Plaintiff is a non-physical being, the "State" lacks standing. Further, criminal cases are civil because there's money involved such as Bonds, where the state holds a human as surety for the Bonds.
@@marshallm7828 I did a lot of research and apparantly it’s too much of a stressful job for me to handle anyways.. I have no idea what job I wanna pursue tho 😭
So how does situations like Injunctions for protection fall into Civil Law where majority of these are ex parte and also involves removing legally owned firearms before any due process takes place?
what is the reason for civil cases existing? you have criminal cases because punishment is required to be a deterrent for committing crimes, but why do you need civil cases?
Hi there, can you tell me about the low IQ people who are ' reefed' into criminal acts beyond their control, in other words, becoming the Patsy. Cherri
Consent to be Governed = Oath of a Public Servant....There is NO such thing as CRIMINAL LAW as per; 28 U.S.C. JUDICIAL & JUDICIARY PROCEDURE - ADMIRALTY, MARITIME & PRIZE CASES § 1333. According to the Historical & Revision Notes 1948 Act “ ... The "saving to suitors" clause in § 41(3) & 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler & more expressive of the original intent of Congress & is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ABOLISHING the distinction between law & equity.” (F.R.C.P. Rule 2. One Form of Action; There is one form of action - the CIVIL action.) Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases. Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition. defines “Admiralty” as; “A court exercising jurisdiction over maritime causes, both civil & criminal, & marine affairs, commerce & navigation, controversies arising out of acts done upon or relating to the sea, & over questions of prize. Also, the system of jurisprudence relating to & growing out of the jurisdiction & practice of the admiralty courts.... Also, the court of the admiral. The building where the lords of the admiralty transact business. In American law. A tribunal exercising jurisdiction over all maritime contracts, torts, injuries, or offenses.... 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS §1408. CIVIL ACTION (a) Jurisdiction The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action commenced under section 1401 of this title and this section by a COVERED EMPLOYEE. 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1401: PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS a) Filing & review of claims Except as otherwise provided, the procedure for consideration of an alleged violation of part A of subchapter II consists of- (1) the filing of a claim by the COVERED EMPLOYEE alleging the violation, as provided in section 1402 of this title; 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1402: Initiation of procedures (a) Claim (1) Filing of claim To commence a proceeding under this subchapter, a covered employee alleging a violation of law made applicable under part A of subchapter II shall file a claim with the Office. The Office shall not accept a claim which is filed after the deadline applicable under subsection (d) (2) Contents of claim The claim filed under this section shall be made in writing under OATH or affirmation, shall describe the facts that form the basis of the claim and the violation that is being alleged, shall identify the EMPLOYING OFFICE alleged to have committed the violation or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, and shall be in such form as the Office requires.
I'm a computer science student no idea how i ended up here
Lol Im in med school. The youtube recommendation algorithm went crazy.
Bruh it’s 4am rn n am 17 why am I watching this
I'm 5
I am studying CPA for accounting haha
my teacher made me watch this
Same
:O
same
I'm a kid so I only watch this stuff by choice
Same
Extremely useful info thanks! I get confused about child custody issues that teeter between being abduction (criminal) and a custody dispute (civil)
Finals got me here - excellent breakdown, thank you!
Very clear and concise video, thank you!
Exactly
Thank you for the clarity!
Great shared
Explained: Civil Law vs Criminal Law
Very good and useful.
I don’t know why I’m here, but I’m binging all of your videos.
thanks jeffrey epstein
heyy! the intern from suits really did a glow up and got to places! way to go Harold!
This video is amazingly to the point. Very helpful!
No it's not; it seems like it to dumb asses like you
;(
I am a first year law student, this was so helpful! Thank you.
This video is literally the best... I noticed how you really threaded the waters and was really careful with your words when you started to reference Zimmerman V. Trayvon Case!.
well explained
Civil mainly focuses on resolution and not punishment. Criminal mainly focuses on punishment of the individual. The State prosecutes the individual.
Thank you, it really helpful information, i just learned this important information. I am not a legal person but a legal translator in litigation.
You can even charged on double liability. For example when you steal some else shirt. You can be charged for theft in criminal cases and held reliable in a civil wrong for plaintiff recover the shirt.
The knowledge of the difference is great. But what to do when the judgement is pass down and they don't pay .....Please do tell
Learned a wealth of knowledge.
Esp. the liability and guilty part,which I will use as the basis of the difference.
Cheers!
wow what an explanation.simply loved it!!
He should be popular....your videos are so good 👍
Great explanation! Thanks dude
Thank you Jay for the clarity.
Criminal law defines wrongful conduct for which the state can take life or liberty..nice video..
With regards to OJ in a criminal case, there is no place for emotions. In the civil case it still doesn't make sense to find someone who was acquitted criminally, yet find them liable.
Amazing Mr .wow thank you so much
How can a murder case be "business" related? How can say, OJ be found not guilty in criminal court yet have to pay money to the opposition's family if there are NO businesses involved?
That is a great question.
Did you teacher send you a link.......
Thank you for this very good illustration 👏
really helpful and clearly explained . thank you!
Thank you! Well explained
Guilty = with malice. Without malice (intent) there is no crime, only a civil case. Example, you ran over a lady in your car, if there was no malice and it was strictly an accident, then no crime, but if you did it on purpose (with malice) then either murder or attempted murder. Also, in Indiana (probably the same everywhere) the rules of court (that take precedent over code) does not allow for any criminal actions, but only criminal proceedings. There is only one form of action, the civil action. The civil rules, also known as the rules of trial procedure, also apply to criminal proceeding, in so much as they do not conflict with the rules of criminal procedure. The only form of action does not conflict with the criminal rules. So it seems, all crimes are civil actions and the answers available in the civil rules all apply.
But isnt there always a possibility of someone masking their malice and just using the excuse of it being an accident or is would there be a substantial amount of evidence that can help determine whether there was malice or no malice without the need of the defendant confessing to anything. ( im new to this so if u could explain it that would be helpful thank u)
Really appreciate this. Thank you.
It seems like civil lawsuits are a backdoor just in case the criminal prosecutions dont work out. I always wondered how is that constitutional.
Seems like another variation of _"double jeopardy,"_ imho.
Thanks for the clarity!
well explanation. Thanks
Pov me : *flopping around in confusion*
just a question if one is found not guilty on what basis can he be sued in the civil court ?
Very clear, Thank you!
Ty for your teaching
Both C.P.C 683
Helps me to understand the difference.
Thank you........ Dat dd help alot 🙌🙌🙌❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Guilt can't get the only determinant of criminal law breaking. An illegal immigrant that hops across U.S. boarders and runs across is obviously 100% guilty. Yet they are not charged criminally.
You do realize that there are costs incurred with prosecutions and jailings right?
Deportation is the cheapest and most practical tool when dealing with illegal immigration.
Wow! Thank u for another knowledge sir
Very helpful
Wonderful explanation. I guess that in addition to money that one can be liable for in a civil case, it could could also mean possession of kids right? as in family courts
So why do we have different definitions for one case first place?
very useful info thank you so much
My Question is does the penal code and criminal procedure Act applicable in civil matters?
I like the way u explained it thank you so much
Thank you
Thank you 😊
Nicely said
with examples I like it.
Sir . it's good work on internet.thanks.plz made 500videos on english vocabulary words with synonyms please please upload on internet
great I wish I could learn law from out of the USA , wll done
successful, continue working greetings
Why isnt the law a subject in school for kids?
this is 2022 and my teacher made me watch this
Very clear
so helpful, thanks
You is good at explainening
Very helpful.
Using info to guilty mental try trick huge payments
Thanks! I found this video very helpful.
Looking for an answer in a debate regarding Johnny Depp’s defamation trial…. Who pays the civil servants working in that courtroom? Anybody?
hey i'm a bit confused.. I thought in the US there is no civil law like in EU but there's common law.
This does not seem to be the case since you're teaching about civil law in US?
Who do I talk to about police harassment in Sacramento California area
thank you!!!
great explanation!
This is a perfect video
Thank you, found that really helpful
Hello new friend watching from southern leyte Philippines
Don't you think the names of the people who got killed should be also called? not only the people who killed them? Good video overall. Thx
Is there a jury involved in a civil case?
Can the police enforce civil probationary periods?
Thank you!
really good. thank you
im just a jhs wanting to be a civil lawyer😩
I’d say beyond a reasonable doubt is more like 99%.
Thankyou so much
why me, as a veterinary nurse, i have to learn about this
thank you
I'm still super confused. If I murder someone, doesn't that mean that I'm technically liable for their murder? Since defamation is a civil law, how do does defamation mean i need to pay money?
Sure if 1) you get caught and 2) convicted
Defamation, look @ you tube, Johnny Depp trial happening now…. Airing of dirty laundry that has now become synonymous with Depp’s formerly good name. 😢
Professor. Do you practice law? I need legal help. Can you direct me to someone that can help?
no
nice!
like it
I disagree with you. Criminal cases are Civil Cases because the Plaintiff is the "State". Since the Plaintiff is a non-physical being, the "State" lacks standing. Further, criminal cases are civil because there's money involved such as Bonds, where the state holds a human as surety for the Bonds.
Very well explained.Thank you!
LAW COURSE has tortured me for a long time, damn it!!!
Is it that bad?? I wanna become a judge, maybe more on the civil side😭Is it worth the studying?
@@saraahmadi3419 if you love reading a lot then yea go for it
@@marshallm7828 I did a lot of research and apparantly it’s too much of a stressful job for me to handle anyways.. I have no idea what job I wanna pursue tho 😭
So how does situations like Injunctions for protection fall into Civil Law where majority of these are ex parte and also involves removing legally owned firearms before any due process takes place?
Yay!
In a criminal case, everyone should challenge jurisdiction. The court cannot prove jurisdiction. I accept all challenges to this statement.
OJ Simpson paid the court under the table 💯
what is the reason for civil cases existing?
you have criminal cases because punishment is required to be a deterrent for committing crimes, but why do you need civil cases?
im 5 yrs old
Sameeee
how did i get here
Hi there, can you tell me about the low IQ people who are ' reefed' into criminal acts beyond their control, in other words, becoming the Patsy.
Cherri
Carrying out criminal acts requires complex thought and action. These patsy play dumb but they know whats up.
what if you have 100 %
What do you think?
Consent to be Governed = Oath of a Public Servant....There is NO such thing as CRIMINAL LAW as per;
28 U.S.C. JUDICIAL & JUDICIARY PROCEDURE - ADMIRALTY, MARITIME & PRIZE CASES § 1333.
According to the Historical & Revision Notes 1948 Act “ ... The "saving to suitors" clause in § 41(3) & 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler & more expressive of the original intent of Congress & is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ABOLISHING the distinction between law & equity.” (F.R.C.P. Rule 2. One Form of Action; There is one form of action - the CIVIL action.) Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases.
Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition. defines “Admiralty” as; “A court exercising jurisdiction over maritime causes, both civil & criminal, & marine affairs, commerce & navigation, controversies arising out of acts done upon or relating to the sea, & over questions of prize. Also, the system of jurisprudence relating to & growing out of the jurisdiction & practice of the admiralty courts.... Also, the court of the admiral. The building where the lords of the admiralty transact business. In American law. A tribunal exercising jurisdiction over all maritime contracts, torts, injuries, or offenses....
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS §1408. CIVIL ACTION
(a) Jurisdiction
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action commenced under section 1401 of this title and this section by a COVERED EMPLOYEE.
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1401: PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS
a) Filing & review of claims
Except as otherwise provided, the procedure for consideration of an alleged violation of part A of subchapter II consists of-
(1) the filing of a claim by the COVERED EMPLOYEE alleging the violation, as provided in section 1402 of this title;
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1402: Initiation of procedures
(a) Claim
(1) Filing of claim
To commence a proceeding under this subchapter, a covered employee alleging a violation of law made applicable under part A of subchapter II shall file a claim with the Office. The Office shall not accept a claim which is filed after the deadline applicable under subsection (d)
(2) Contents of claim
The claim filed under this section shall be made in writing under OATH or affirmation, shall describe the facts that form the basis of the claim and the violation that is being alleged, shall identify the EMPLOYING OFFICE alleged to have committed the violation or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, and shall be in such form as the Office requires.
Jesus Christ loves you