He's taking the game immediately out of book into an anomaly he has studied and practiced so his opponent cannot rush through the opening by routine to save the clock for middle and endgame. He immediately directs the game into a position his opponent hasn't prepared for but he has.
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy are you a master at belittling, Marc? Are you a master at baiting, master baiter? 🤣 There was no need to try to knock me down with your superiority complex in such an unsubliminal way. Maybe switch to decaf? I can also see that his pawn move attacks the fianchetto. I get it. However, attacking the fianchetto is seen commonly in chess games, whereas h5 from this position is not at all common. Therefore, I stand by what I wrote as his primary objective. What you stated is fact: h5 attacks the fianchetto. What I stated is an opinion about his possible subtlety of play- it's an educated guess, since I'm educated in the ways of chess. If you ever attended any classes yourself, they certainly never taught you not to be rude to strangers without any provocation.
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy Smooches. I don't know why you felt the need to start trash talking on a chess video, but I had to respond with some sizzle. I might have overdone it. Maybe I need to switch to decaf too. Cheers. ☕
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy I got rankled by this part of your reply:"....which is a tactic you obviously didn't reach yet" That smacks of unnecessary depreciation. Maybe English isn't your first language. I have no idea how you could have meant anything respectful by that, but if I misunderstood, I apologize for being so salty.
Also it's more difficult to computer analyze an opponents play when they start with weird opening moves. Magnus has been mixing up his opening for awhile now as a long term strategy.
Around 6:36, why doesn't he take the pawn with the horse? From E5 to F7. Also pressuring the tower. Not sure what happend at the end, all of a sudden the match is over?
I think the goal was to combat the off-center pawn structure but he forgot about the knight. But it didn't matter cuz after that his rook was free which made it more like .5 behind instead of 1
Magnus did not "forget" the knight. He played a deliberate gambit, reasoning according to the internal logic of gambits that he would find compensation in piece activity and open lines.
@@ismailabdelirada9073 i mean one point down is one point down. There's no world where that is tactically sound, "compensation" wasn't found till much later. it was either a deliberate sack out of disrespect or a blunder. take your pick. he was able to take advantage of the open file with the rook, but there are other ways to obtain the open file while either trading evenly, or being one pawn up. But, he's Magnus, so it didn't ultimately matter.
@@Gabriel-fz4ys : Whether you think of it in tactical terms or strategic, there is such a thing as positional compensation, and that is why one pawn down is not always "one point down." That compensation can take the form of a lead in development, a superior pawn structure, the more active pieces, or pressure in some form. Almost always, it means that in real terms the gambiteer is not really down the conventional value of the material he has sacrificed.
Magnus thought he can easily win against elo 2200, he almost lost but he is right, it is rapid chess, I will beat you although u almost won. Magnus is so great
It is almost a crime to let a 2200 rated player to play against Magnus rated at 2800..... 2800 is a whole different league.... Openings don't matter, 2800 rated players make any opening favourable to themselves against 2200 rated players.....
@@rannethtanThat can be said for all brackets in Chess though. You basically get promoted, and then you have to practice this new strategy over, and over again. Until you grauate to the next one. If you have no experience against a new to you opening you're likely to get wrecked.
White do a good job keeping black at bay until g4? (Rc3 maybe?). As for the opening, well, in 3+2 you do not have so much time to refute a thing like 1...h5!? against a top-level GM. Yo will have to close your opening book and open your position analysis book instead, and play!
Some 100 years ago the clearly better player started the game with a piece less ( most often a rook) to make the game more interesting for both players. I suppose this is Magnus way of creating the same effect.
I won't presume to guess his motive, but what Magnus is doing here is what I used to do in long blitz "discussions" with various regular opponents. In principle, every opening is playable if played according to its internal logic, so I put this to the test. There were certain opponents with whom I set myself the task, over the course of dozens of games, to begin play with every possible opening with each color. My results varied, but certainly I never found evidence that the principle was not sound, nor any opening unplayable.
Dia seperti mesin cara berpikirnya.., permainan catur sekedar isi waktu kosong ..kata pecatur zadul....Paul morphi.. seandainya dia bisa saling tarung .. morphi vs magnus..!??;:"
he can do whatever he wants during the first 5 moves ... I wonder what he's thinking ; certainly not "what would be best now?", maybe "what would be the most ridiculous way to play without losing?"
In this very short format it is good to play something unusual to force yoyr opponent to think from the first move. Orherwise, they know all thé moves up to maybe 6 or 7
@@guillaumelacoste9614: That's six or seven in lines without deep theory. There are plenty of variations in the more commonly played openings where I as a ~2200 player knew the theory up to move 30, and so did my regular opponents. (In one such blitz discussion with NM Gjon Feinstein in 1989, on a variation of the Max Lange Attack, we repeated the same lines to the point that we'd both complete our first 12 moves with 4:59 left on our clocks. Did we _need_ to rattle off all those moves so fast? I would say, "Yes." If, when original thinking began in the early middlegame, either of us had lagged from this pace by so much as a second, the gap on the clock often decided the outcome.) We'd often carry on these deep theoretical "discussions" where the actual original play commenced in the middlegame. But this could grow monotonous, so I would sometimes do as Magnus does here: Play something offbeat or even anti-theoretical in a quest for _terra nova_ and original ideas. As theory continues to expand with the aid of AI, the motive to do this will only grow stronger, and we will see evermore irregular lines of play at even the highest levels. This will continue until the day when AI has removed the sting from all the new lines as it is doing with the old, and all the world's grandmasters lament, as Capablanca did a century ago, that chess is "played out." It won't be, but by that time theory will have surpassed the holding capacity of human faculties, and its further advance will be in the electronic "hands" of AI.
He's taking the game immediately out of book into an anomaly he has studied and practiced so his opponent cannot rush through the opening by routine to save the clock for middle and endgame. He immediately directs the game into a position his opponent hasn't prepared for but he has.
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy are you a master at belittling, Marc? Are you a master at baiting, master baiter? 🤣 There was no need to try to knock me down with your superiority complex in such an unsubliminal way. Maybe switch to decaf? I can also see that his pawn move attacks the fianchetto. I get it. However, attacking the fianchetto is seen commonly in chess games, whereas h5 from this position is not at all common. Therefore, I stand by what I wrote as his primary objective. What you stated is fact: h5 attacks the fianchetto. What I stated is an opinion about his possible subtlety of play- it's an educated guess, since I'm educated in the ways of chess. If you ever attended any classes yourself, they certainly never taught you not to be rude to strangers without any provocation.
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy Smooches. I don't know why you felt the need to start trash talking on a chess video, but I had to respond with some sizzle. I might have overdone it. Maybe I need to switch to decaf too. Cheers. ☕
@@Jason-Moon i was talking about chess, you are the one who took it personal, read my comment again and you will see
@@MasterMarcSubliminals-oj5jy I got rankled by this part of your reply:"....which is a tactic you obviously didn't reach yet" That smacks of unnecessary depreciation. Maybe English isn't your first language. I have no idea how you could have meant anything respectful by that, but if I misunderstood, I apologize for being so salty.
Also it's more difficult to computer analyze an opponents play when they start with weird opening moves. Magnus has been mixing up his opening for awhile now as a long term strategy.
Nepo always on the background
He looks so bored and doesn’t even want to be there
Strategy?
White played great and was better until g4. Then the guy passed too much time watching Magnus than staying focused on the chess board.
Exactly. It’s almost as if he was proud that g4 stumped Magnus a bit, and lost focus himself
It forces the enemy to be behind on opening tempo for black and opening up the castle at the cost of a pawn
This is why Magnus is so loved. Keep the game fun
If you love Magnus, that is fine, but how do you know most people love him?
@@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar he draws attention always, in person and online. By far the most popular chess player in the world.
Would he play the same with a top 5 player? Almost feels disrespectful.
I'm assuming he was trying to throw Nepo off at the next table.
Its a gambit variation for black
E4 F5
F5* G6
G6* G6*
And have the h file open
His is the quicker way
The answer is: he did not open with h5 he opened with g3 in a standard Kings Indian opening
Next time please identify your pronouns. The real answer is to open the rook file for the eventual white castle
Sacrificing the pawn for a tempo later
The answer to this question is: I am Magnus, I can open with whatever move I want.
😂😂😂😂😂
😂
The move was opened by Semetei
You didn’t watch the video right?
…and he can.
He’s oponent is like laughing when magnus needs to go with his rook
Because he doesn't want to play theory. He wants to play deep reading.
@@mhreinhardt that's exactly why I only play Fischer Random 960 anymore.
Around 6:36, why doesn't he take the pawn with the horse? From E5 to F7. Also pressuring the tower. Not sure what happend at the end, all of a sudden the match is over?
Time was over for Semetei
@bastierdmann3446 Thank you
I think the goal was to combat the off-center pawn structure but he forgot about the knight. But it didn't matter cuz after that his rook was free which made it more like .5 behind instead of 1
Magnus did not "forget" the knight. He played a deliberate gambit, reasoning according to the internal logic of gambits that he would find compensation in piece activity and open lines.
@@ismailabdelirada9073 i mean one point down is one point down. There's no world where that is tactically sound, "compensation" wasn't found till much later. it was either a deliberate sack out of disrespect or a blunder. take your pick. he was able to take advantage of the open file with the rook, but there are other ways to obtain the open file while either trading evenly, or being one pawn up. But, he's Magnus, so it didn't ultimately matter.
@@Gabriel-fz4ys : Whether you think of it in tactical terms or strategic, there is such a thing as positional compensation, and that is why one pawn down is not always "one point down."
That compensation can take the form of a lead in development, a superior pawn structure, the more active pieces, or pressure in some form. Almost always, it means that in real terms the gambiteer is not really down the conventional value of the material he has sacrificed.
I couldn't talk when I saw Gordon Ramsey playing chess so well
Ngomong opo der😅
Gordon Ramsay... 😂😂😂😂😂 I hadn't noticed that
This is pretty ancient technique I remember my uncle starting this way. It is really effective
How they end the game please anyone explain me what happen at lasa😢😢
Ran out of time
White lost on time...
@@juniperwoodgreen4090diputs
Well, you see, when a player loses time, he loses
Crappy position and going to lose material because of failed slant eyed strategy.
I dont get it. It didn't look like it was over
Clock timed out
Magnus thought he can easily win against elo 2200, he almost lost but he is right, it is rapid chess, I will beat you although u almost won. Magnus is so great
Now the way the kamuchoncholi is steering at Magnus after that pawn G4, he thinks he has won..
How do these guys get live video of OTB game?
Magnus played really badly but his opponent was very excited because of the name Magnus which resulted in a blunder
To easily get rid of the light square bishop on g2 and open a file for the rook
Because 1g3 invites 1...h5, with the idea of either opening up the h-file, or exchanging the Black rook for a knight with an attack on the White king!
Kf3 was a better move at 6:53😮
Rook to h5 was the winning move, right? I was yelling "back to the corner, what else!", but Magnus was right, of course.
Who won 🏆
Yes l do wish they would say checkmate at the end. Confusing sometimes to see who's won!
Good played by Semetei.
I thought his peak was 2882 not 2888 0:01
Magnus missed the move with his Knight. He could have checkmated him easily. Even the great ones miss moves
At which minute?
@gonzalosanchez1425 about 3 minutes. I just couldn't stand to see Bibi go through the emotional trauma again.
What happened at the end, who won?
Magnus won because Semetei ran out of time
So if you ran out of time but you have many points like white, who is the winner?
Ooow white fucked up 2:25
Carlson has it... at this point we know... let's continue
It is almost a crime to let a 2200 rated player to play against Magnus rated at 2800..... 2800 is a whole different league.... Openings don't matter, 2800 rated players make any opening favourable to themselves against 2200 rated players.....
dude, are you stupid?
What did it cost him?Dude look like he flew over the cukoo nest.
Even 2600s don't stand a chance against Magnus. He can defeat them despite playing absurd openings like bongcloud
@@rannethtanThat can be said for all brackets in Chess though. You basically get promoted, and then you have to practice this new strategy over, and over again. Until you grauate to the next one. If you have no experience against a new to you opening you're likely to get wrecked.
This is BRILLIANT Strategy
Semeti tried to surprise Magnus with unusual first moves. But it's in vain! Magnus knows everything!
White do a good job keeping black at bay until g4? (Rc3 maybe?). As for the opening, well, in 3+2 you do not have so much time to refute a thing like 1...h5!? against a top-level GM. Yo will have to close your opening book and open your position analysis book instead, and play!
Who won?
Magnus… on time
Only Magnus Carlsen knows how to out calculate weak players such as Semetai
Some 100 years ago the clearly better player started the game with a piece less ( most often a rook) to make the game more interesting for both players. I suppose this is Magnus way of creating the same effect.
Very far the level between them
वेल done boy👍
How is Nepo sitting next to Magnus in every tournament
It's in his contract.
So he can learn how to play.. 😂😂😂😮😮
Why didn't he take f3 with the Queen?
In the case of 1 g3 h5 carries some point.
If 1 d4 h5 or 1 e4 h5......just resign. Dignity matters.
Who won ???
magnus with time out
Er who won?
Did he won?
Hahaha 🤣😂 not wanted to be disturbed! Magnus Aguilus!
Why did he answer with 1…. h4? Because he can!
I just tried that opening and I won 2 games.😮
my son, who is a toddler, kept asking for the phone so I let him play when we got matched up, congrats
He thinks he could beat MC at his own unusual opening?
Don't try this at home 😅
In White's last move - to which Magnus surrenders - was there no possibility of perpetual check by Magnus with his rooks?
He won by time
@@thiagof9481 Oh oh that shows I'm a donkey
It is like asking why Magnus does anything he does when he plays chess. The answer is, because he can.....
Because his name is Magnus Carlsen 😂
Mnaeza kazua sasa😂😂
I won't presume to guess his motive, but what Magnus is doing here is what I used to do in long blitz "discussions" with various regular opponents.
In principle, every opening is playable if played according to its internal logic, so I put this to the test. There were certain opponents with whom I set myself the task, over the course of dozens of games, to begin play with every possible opening with each color.
My results varied, but certainly I never found evidence that the principle was not sound, nor any opening unplayable.
Because it thwarted the possibility of king side castling
What took Magnus so long at 4:40. Why didn't he check the white king with his knight since that pawn moved
In White's last move - to which Magnus surrenders - was there no possibility of perpetual check by Magnus with his rooks?
@@victorrossomano5025 magnus won, look at the clock
@@fatsilentbob Yes yes, sorry I'm a donkey!
There was no good follow up move.
Why is Rg8 such a bad move at the end?
I don't play chess enough to know whether it was a good/bad move, but in case it is relevant to you, the game ended because Semetei ran out of time.
Given the trouble brewing for white, he didn’t have time to go fishing for a pawn on the other side of the board.
It's called improvisation
Pourquoi Magnus a sacrifié un pion dès l'ouverture 🤯🤯🤯🤯?
Was it a draw ??????????
Not easy to defeat MC, what... Though looks danger he still won by time
Magnus would have won anyway. Look closely, he had the advantage.
@@ironcladranchandforge7292There was no way forward. Carlsen was only bluffing to make his opponent scared and lose time.
Because he felt like it
Geez I'm a total beginner. Did white win? Did they skip through the endgame because they know the end? I don't even see a check.
Who win?
Black or white??
Many mistakes by the white.😢
It's just an theorique open
Does Magnus win most competitions he enters?
Try to win this with black, is not easy
Attack east coast 🥳
Sai should of castled AND THERES NO GIVING UP
Lamsum tam pamham...😅
Dia seperti mesin cara berpikirnya.., permainan catur sekedar isi waktu kosong ..kata pecatur zadul....Paul morphi.. seandainya dia bisa saling tarung .. morphi vs magnus..!??;:"
Roy
Carlsen badly needs a haircut.
And you badly need to find a hobby. Do you often fixate on men’s hairstyles?
Получил откровенно проигранную позицию, потерял кучу темпов. По факту Карлсен не должен был выигрывать эту партию
How come he lost the game ?
Magnus won as his oponent's time was up. He would have won anyhow..
@@ernokirnyan9984Yes, Semetei just blundered a couple moves.
@@ernokirnyan9984thanks for the explanation 👍🏽
impossible not to blunder in given time if you are not engine
Magnus always looks bored out of his mind… lmao
At 6:58 there was a fork versus Magnus with the night taking One of the two towers
he can do whatever he wants during the first 5 moves ... I wonder what he's thinking ; certainly not "what would be best now?", maybe "what would be the most ridiculous way to play without losing?"
Draw
To free the rook
#notEasyToDefeatTheMan
Who won here?
Magnus Won by time.
Magnus
lost on time
@@hanlynn-l4ihow?
@@EDurdinLook at the clock
Lost horse
Pertahanan vietnam
Why did magnus just let the opponent eat the pond for nothing at beginning? I'm noob
To free his rook and create a weakness in the king side pawn structure. Other guy defended that very well though.
This guy: I’m going to destroy Magnus with my King’s Indian Attack.
Magnus: Harry? Harry! Go go go go!
ruclips.net/user/shortsxowclVyzHVM?si=rbK712RIp-I9XVA2
The Mag lost.
No respect for his opponent.
to open the rook for early development thats why he try to sacrifice the H file
In this very short format it is good to play something unusual to force yoyr opponent to think from the first move. Orherwise, they know all thé moves up to maybe 6 or 7
@@guillaumelacoste9614: That's six or seven in lines without deep theory. There are plenty of variations in the more commonly played openings where I as a ~2200 player knew the theory up to move 30, and so did my regular opponents.
(In one such blitz discussion with NM Gjon Feinstein in 1989, on a variation of the Max Lange Attack, we repeated the same lines to the point that we'd both complete our first 12 moves with 4:59 left on our clocks.
Did we _need_ to rattle off all those moves so fast?
I would say, "Yes." If, when original thinking began in the early middlegame, either of us had lagged from this pace by so much as a second, the gap on the clock often decided the outcome.)
We'd often carry on these deep theoretical "discussions" where the actual original play commenced in the middlegame.
But this could grow monotonous, so I would sometimes do as Magnus does here: Play something offbeat or even anti-theoretical in a quest for _terra nova_ and original ideas.
As theory continues to expand with the aid of AI, the motive to do this will only grow stronger, and we will see evermore irregular lines of play at even the highest levels.
This will continue until the day when AI has removed the sting from all the new lines as it is doing with the old, and all the world's grandmasters lament, as Capablanca did a century ago, that chess is "played out."
It won't be, but by that time theory will have surpassed the holding capacity of human faculties, and its further advance will be in the electronic "hands" of AI.
Give away
Who won?
Not sure I think it was a draw
Magnus. The other guy ran out of time. Played very well though.
It was a bluff to eat the clock, Whit was doing well though...