Mr. Rochester Proposes to Jane - Jane Eyre | RomComs
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- Mr. Rochester (Michael Fassbender) finally confesses his feelings for Jane (Mia Wasikowska) and asks her to marry him as equals.
What is Jane Eyre (2011) about?
When orphaned governess Jane Eyre (Mia Wasikowska) arrives at imposing Thornfield Hall, she’s intrigued by her brooding wealthy employer, Rochester (Michael Fassbender). His dark moods and the strange occurrences in the house lead her to discover a terrible secret that he had hoped to hide from her forever.
Watch the full movie here: www.uphe.com/m...
Liked it? Subscribe here for more official clips! www.youtube.co...
***
Welcome to RomComs, the official channel for the best romantic moments and clips of your favorite films and TV series!
#janeeyre #michaelfassbender #romcoms #charlottebrontë
"It is my spirit that addresses your spirit" oooh this scene is just *chef's kiss*
She was so trampled on that she couldn't accept or believe that somebody would actually love her. That is so sad.
But that happens...it is very hard to believe that love can be there when one receives only hurt after hurt in want of love.
True, and also he was her boss/superior, _and_ had endeavored to deceive her into thinking he loved someone else. No wonder she found it hard to believe
He doesnt love her. He wants her 20 year old body. Rofl. Atleast in the version I am watching, he is old enough to be her dad.
@@monmothma3358 He was manipulating her, to make her want him, because he knew she didnt. However, if she became jealous he was giving attention to someone else, she may lose her place in the household. She doesnt love him. She is loving being taken care of because she never had a dad. This movie is definately showing the role of women, as caretakers and being used by men. He treated her pathetically in the beginning. This movie urks me.
@@ENFPerspectives What the heck? Did you write this story? Jane Eyre was most definitely in love with Mr Rochester and he with her, and no, not just "for her body". If you read the book, you'll find that the two have a pretty equal relationship, certainly by the end when she's no longer in his service and has gotten her own fortune, but also before, as she was quite strong mentally and morally, and he admired that. If I remember correctly, they actually both manipulate one other a little bit, it's not just him pretending he's marrying someone else to make her admit she loved him.
I love this movie, it doesn't just tug on your heartstrings, it yanks on them.
Magnifique commentaire c mon sentiment aussi envers le livre et l'histoire et même au cinéma
I cannot get enough of that scene. Just incredible acting and so believable and touching.
True, I have been obsessed over this film since yesterday, the acting is striking! ❤
This is my second favorite adaptation!! The 1983 BBC version will always have my heart, but this is a very close second!
Same for me but a close 3rd to this adaptation is the 1943 solely for the amazing performance Orson Welles put in as Rochester.
The 1983 version with Dalton and Clark is without peer. This version is cringeworthy down to be the glaring grammatical error in Jane's script.
@@janebishop5885 If this was the only other version I had seen, I would agree with you. However, as long as we live in a world where the 1996 Jane Eyre exists, this will ring through with a high rating.
yes! Tim Dalton was a far better Rochester imo!
@@janebishop5885 That 'for I to leave you' drives me bonkers. Whoever wrote that line needs to be locked up in a cell with a grammar book as his/her only companion.
It's so sad to know that he knew all the time he was married and couldn't marry someone else and especially to fool Jane like that, who never would have accepted that degrading situation... I understand the tragedy of Mr. Rochester marriage, but he should have done the right thing for Jane. He should have found a way to legally divorce his mad wife and still take care of her, she didn't need to be in the same house, he could have paid for a home for her with more than one nurse to take care of her and then ask Jane to marry him, after, of course, explaining why he didn't tell her his secret until now and why he divorced. Jane might have left anyways, dissapointed in him lying to her and being a married man while getting close to her, but she would have forgiven him sooner. Mr. Rochester did this very wrong and very selfishly and paid for it too, almost with his life. I am sorry he hurt her so much after she suffered that abuse as a child, she really didn't deserve it. It was mad luck that they cold finally be together and the wife not in the way anymore. Unfortunatelly, in real life, we should keep away from somene resembling Mr. Rochester.
I have to admit….the BBC production is my no 1. What a fantastic story.
*swoon* The words in this scene are without equal! I adore Jane Austen especially 'Persuasion', but this is intimate gold.
You are right! I adore Jane Austen! And I adore "Pride and Prejudice"!!!
And this was not written by Jane Austen
@@gabrielaburcea5734 I don't think she thought it was, I think she was comparing this to Austen.
If we analyze the scene,Jane at first was a bit confused and terrified to actually accept the proposal,I honestly think that before the confession it was kind of like an argument,Mr Rochester is a simple man,whereas I find jane a bit clever,but the scene is so fucking beautiful that I have no words to describe it❤❤❤✨️✨️🫀
Fassbender.
BRILLIANT since "Shame".
Omg i just realized he sat there with his dog in the end of the movie 🥹
Fabulous…
I'm really missing the chemistry between these two extraordinary actors. The beautiful Michael Fassbinder's Rochester is too elegant, soft, and gentle and not enough of a contrast with the softness of Jane Eyre. For me, the best interpretation was the one with Charlotte Gainsbourg and William Hurt.
Some orphans fare better than others.
I thought this scene looked awfully awkward when it came to the kissing LOL 😂 this version of the movie was ok yet between the actors there wasn’t any chemistry in my opinion the 2006 version was better.
I will not cheat myself. I will suffer.😐
The best version is Ciarian Hinds as Mr. Rochester! He is Rochester…
For me also the best version ( 1997). Super. Ciaran Hinds & Samantha Morton. 🤗
I like that in this story no one cares about the age difference between Rochester and Jane
And surprise their relationship worked
:)))❤️
It that time in England, most 35-40 men married 16 to 23 girls. They had to have the means to keep a family and a home, an income for the many kids and wife. At 19 they couldnt for sure. And given the neverending immaturity of guys, I don't think it was bad.
❤️🦔
❤️
Ich habe fünf Punkte 🥳
He was the best
🌹
She is a good Jane, but he is too soft spoken and too tame for Rochester. The character is portrayed in the book as being rough, proud, arrogant even and controlling. I dont really like this set back Rochester. I also dont feel the passion, the chemistry.
1997 with Ciaran Hinds and Samantha Morton the best for me
@@sokamori28 This is true. Best Mr. R. and Jane .
Sorry don't know book about then
Ummm to avoid bigamy, be honest with your girlfriend that you have a wife. Lying to both is against your religion and rude.
I am sorry to say that, but these two great actors have zero chemistry.
That's crazy cause they definitely do to many people.
I just watched the movie and I think they have a great chemistry
Very disappointed with the actress's performance. She is not Jane Eyre, not at all.