Hot garbage. The engine is based off a German WW2 design for a super-heavy that never made it into production, for reasons that also included the complexity of the engine and its reliability problems. It's also a guarantee they can't build anymore T-14s, or at least not enough to make a difference since they screwed themselves out of the Western tech they need to build them. In fact, I'd go so far to say that the T-90 if built to spec and retains ALL of its components before hitting the field of battle ie: no stripping parts and components off them to sell, is superior to the T-14. But corruption hollowed out that tank as well and the war cut them off the tech they need to build them too. One thing I've learned in my 57 years of existence is, when the Soviet Union/Russia or China says they developed the best piece of military hardware ever, they aren't even close.
A strongly doubt that "many" countries around the world were wanting to buy it. I don't know if you know anything about tanks or amoured vehicles in general, but the T14 has way too many of what is known as "shot" traps. Meaning that the design has quite a few places where a round will not bounce off the armour, but get caught in that armour and explode. The front and sides of the turret have several , as well as just beneath the main gun. If you look at modern NATO tanks, as well as the Israeli Merkava, you'll notice that the front armour on the turret is all smooth, there is nowhere for a round to be caught. You'll also notice that the gap between the the barrel and the tank chassis is very small, unlike the T14. The T14 has also not made an appearance on the frontline in Ukraine at all. For the simple reason, Russia knows it won't be effective and they don't want to take another hit to their already dented pride. They should have stuck with the T90, and spent the money on upgrading that rather than a new tank design. Would have been more cost effective and they were already building them.
Great video mate thanks for posting
Thank you for your feedback. It really helps me create better videos.
So stealthy that it's yet to be seen on the battlefields of Ukraine.
This "Battle Tank", in reality it is only a Tank, because it has seen no BATTLE yet (and probably never will)
Hot garbage. The engine is based off a German WW2 design for a super-heavy that never made it into production, for reasons that also included the complexity of the engine and its reliability problems. It's also a guarantee they can't build anymore T-14s, or at least not enough to make a difference since they screwed themselves out of the Western tech they need to build them. In fact, I'd go so far to say that the T-90 if built to spec and retains ALL of its components before hitting the field of battle ie: no stripping parts and components off them to sell, is superior to the T-14. But corruption hollowed out that tank as well and the war cut them off the tech they need to build them too.
One thing I've learned in my 57 years of existence is, when the Soviet Union/Russia or China says they developed the best piece of military hardware ever, they aren't even close.
Thank you for your feedback. It really helps me create better videos.
Unfortunately it does not work, simple as.
A strongly doubt that "many" countries around the world were wanting to buy it. I don't know if you know anything about tanks or amoured vehicles in general, but the T14 has way too many of what is known as "shot" traps. Meaning that the design has quite a few places where a round will not bounce off the armour, but get caught in that armour and explode. The front and sides of the turret have several , as well as just beneath the main gun. If you look at modern NATO tanks, as well as the Israeli Merkava, you'll notice that the front armour on the turret is all smooth, there is nowhere for a round to be caught. You'll also notice that the gap between the the barrel and the tank chassis is very small, unlike the T14. The T14 has also not made an appearance on the frontline in Ukraine at all. For the simple reason, Russia knows it won't be effective and they don't want to take another hit to their already dented pride. They should have stuck with the T90, and spent the money on upgrading that rather than a new tank design. Would have been more cost effective and they were already building them.
Thank you for your feedback. It really helps me create better videos.