"Evolution Busted in only 8 Minutes: The Definitive Counter-Argument!"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 сен 2024
- In just 10 minutes, you'll hear why the book is Genesis is actually true!
Whether you're a skeptic or curious, this quick takedown will provide fresh insights and thought-provoking points.
***Like, comment, and subscribe for more eye-opening content!
Extremely smart gentleman, showing facts, no speculations 👍
Sorry, but no! The lack of facts is actually scary
Those are _not_ the postulates of evolution.
We are living in 21th century and yet there are people who still talk and understand like those of first century
@@richardkharpuri2337 Romans 1:18-22
It gets always embarrassing when someone tries to disprove evolution who knows as much about it as a hippo about stepdancing.
If you believe in evolution, your historical knowledge is destroyed. For example, a simple question. Where did royal families come from, and why is Egypt called that? Your monkey man nonsense doesn't give you the answer does it? But the Bible does.
@@marcj3682 Did your parents lock you up in a cage when you were supposed to go to school? Or were you homeschooled by your crazy uncle and then dropped out of 4th grade? Or why else are you that illiterate to not know that evolution is one discipline within biology and has nothing to do with the question why someone became a king or why a country has a certain name?
Modern science isn't allowed to believe in the supernatural, so even if 2+2=4 they can't come to that conclusion.
That’s a meaningless statement because science isn’t a conscious mind that is capable of believing anything.
Besides for that, the purpose for which we have created science is to understand the natural world. Science cannot explain anything that cannot be observed, nor was it ever intended to.
Very enlightened brother in Christ. Praises to our creator and savior.
I'm flabbergasted by the stupidness of this caracter, and the confidence he has in his absurd claims. Clowns like this should be laughed at, not admired
@@wondery6693 so you believe that a pair of penguins swam from the arctic and walked across a desert to board a boat? 😂😂
@@johndewet7494 Your reply makes you appear small petty childish and a troll. Don't try to say what you think I believe and be so foolish. Try being a serious adult. I said nothing close to what you said. It's so funny that you still think all penguins live in the arctic. Most live in warm weather John. But Bless you anyway hoping you gain wisdom and kindness.
Everything this guy says is bogus for the reasons set forth in the comments the last two times this channel posted this video.
this is the foundation of the organization Answers in Genesis....
You know its a heap of BS when Genesis or creation is in the name 😂🤣😂
@@truthgiver8286 Romans 1:18-22
What a remarkable man concise and to the point examining the facts what we know not the speculation of what we don't know.
We cannot get to 2 million animal species as we have on the planet now through evolution.... and this is because the extinction rate vastly outpaces evolution rate. We are told that we don't witness evolution taking place because it takes millions of years for new species to develop. But we are losing hundreds to thousands of species every year. With this extinction rate, how could we ever get to the biodiversity we see around us? Extinction is working way too well for us to ever have a net gain of species. There would by necessity then have to be some unnatural utopian-like era in the past where practically no species was lost and we only gained. This era because evolution takes such a long time, would by necessity have to last millions and millions of years.
Assertions without evidence.
@@avishevin1976 Let's hear the evidence for evolution
An unchallenged run away. Why has he not applied for a Nobel prize in disproving evolution? 😂😂😂
A biologist would have a field day debating this clown.
Insults are the tools of clowns.
Natural selection can not create morphological changes 😂
Natural selection doesn’t create _any_ changes.
Who knows what really caused humans to be what they are today. But creationist are putting their entire reason for believing in God, from a book or books, written by various humans. You don’t have faith in God, you have faith in books.
such evidence will change how we think about God?
NO IT WONT
do you have no idea of the stubbornness of humans when faced with truth?
and do you actually assume that people are HONEST when it comes to truth and evidence for God?
that is the trouble with apologists. their whole endeavour assumes that people will be swayed by logic and fact
yet the bible says differently see romans chapter1
and what did Jesus say would persuade people? see the high priestly prayer in John Chapter 17
Many people have come to faith through reasoned discussion and an honest examination of the facts. Josh McDowell for one and C.S. Lewis for another.
He presented solid reasons for why HE believes Earth is young. People will make up their own minds.
All higher creatures are a community of specialized cells.....ALL of them.....what are you talking about?
You are limiting God He can create in 6 days or one
The age of trees proves nothing about the age of the universe.....what does is the distances that light travels from stars and galaxies to earth.....about 13 billion years according to the Hubble telescope.....you cannot get around that one.
The trees are to show life on this planet is much younger than led to believe.
The flood could explain the continental drift and genetics showa we are descened from one woman😊
Anil, you havent got a clue about evolution, no idea at all.
You got nothing
Funny how evolution is only disproven on RUclips
😮😢😮😊😅😅😅❤😂🎉😢😮😊😅😮😮😢😮😮🎉😊😊😅😅😅😢😮
Funny you think there is proof of common descent.
@@PETERJOHN101
The NASA definition for life on earth is ….
.
Life is a self sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution .
.
This is the part where you tell me you are right. NASA is wrong. 😂
Nope. Evolution is religion.
No amount of evidence is able to convince an unbelieving heart.
*_False Dichotomy_* arguments on evolution pit Random Mutation evolution against God's hands-on modifications. What if *_NEITHER_* of these are true? As I keep learning, proof of God continues to grow, but wouldn't it be just as wonderful to learn that God was so smart that he could create life which could self-program in order to attempt to survive an environmental threat? Theistic evolution is almost *_never_* mentioned.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
God created life, fully formed and perfect. No need for random mutations and natural selection which are inadequate mechanisms in the first place. They only can act on existing genetic information, they have no way to create it. Also, there are inherent limitations in genetics that aren't going to allow for macro evolution in the first place. Genetic engineering clearly shows this. Genetic recombination only produces variation within a kind. After God completed the creation process, death wasn't present, it was only after the fall of man that death entered into His creation. Evolution, requires death, time and chance and is wholly inadequate in explaining the complex and diverse life we see on this planet.
The education u pay for let's you down 😢
Because you are now the best source for science, right bro?
Love it
The flood
Year of the Flood, 2500 BC? Where did he get that date? Well, it's wrong! Not even close. Ussher's date for the Flood was 2349 BC, and most other 17th and 18th century estimates were close to this, but they're ALL wrong. Some 3 years after Usser's date, Egypt's 6th Dynasty started. Some 13 years after that date, Sargon the Great conquered Sumer, soon establishing an empire which stretched from the Mediterranean to the plateaus of Iran. If the Flood happened when Ussher said it did, then from where did all of those thousands of people come? In 3 years, and 13 years?
Sloppy scholarship does NOT give us answers. But when you humble yourself to the Lord, and ask Him, "Dear Heavenly Father, what do I need to understand about this in order to see your Truth?" A little math and logic don't hurt, either.
And with this approach, Genesis tells us that,
* Chapters 1-3 were non-physical -- BEFORE time even began;
* Chapters 4-5 ARE the embedded Tree of Life matrix, even to the detail of skipping Enoch for God took him;
* The seemingly outrageous ages of the Genesis 5 patriarchs are *_too short!_* and need to be greatly multiplied to reach God's Truth;
* Chapter 5 is about the *_Generations_* of eponymous tribes, with the Methuselah tribe living for over 3 million years;
* The Marks placed upon Cain and Lamech in Chapter 4 are *_mirrored in Chapter 5_* with the prime factors of the ages of Cainan and Lamech;
* And the new timeline derived from these clues gives us a Flood date which coincides with the *_EXTINCTION_* of the "daughters" species which had threatened God's way upon the Earth.
Want more? See my book, *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom,_* NOW FREE to download. In fact, ALL of my religious and spiritual books are FREE as ebooks, and at-cost for the print versions.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
He was not saying the flood was 2500 years ago it was an approximation of the time period he knows I know and you no that. It was just a number he used just to make a point to the general public, there are plenty of books and other forms of information on this subject for people who wish to know more that's all.
@@alansegger6199 You were born 7 seconds ago. Heck, that's just an approximation!
When you're that far off, you may as well NOT say anything. That you defend something that's off by 10x -- not merely 2,000 years, but *_Over 25,000 years,_* -- I'd like to give you a chance to discuss the topic rather than making incorrect assumptions. Being that far off is NOT an approximation or a "round-off."
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
Who is this?
extremely smart gentleman all he needs is a decent education 😁
You mean, indoctrination.
You *_almost_* had a thumbs up. But too many errors. There is unshakable evidence that the Earth and the universe are extremely ancient -- measured in BILLIONS of years. Colliding galaxies take millions of years to pass one another, and several are shown to have been in the process of a third pass as they spiral toward one another. The continents on Earth were once joined, and they could not have reached their current separation in 6,000 years without earthquakes which would have turned all mountains into sand from the severe vibrations.
The speaker has *_SOME_* good logic, but falls far, far short.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
Well some folks just wanna disprove everything for their beliefs reality hurt sometimes
👌🙏👍
calls himself a scientist but doesnt know why sealife is found atop mountains
Particularly amusing given the 200 meter high megatsumami in Greenland LAST WEEK. Perhaps we should invite him to visit & taste the salt, off the corpses of sealife - before the rain washes it away?
@@imankhandaker6103 its actually found atop the hymalayas for example because what we now call india was once an island,continental drift pushed it towards its current position,when it collided with the coast over millions of years it pushed the coastal mantel under the seabed making the seabed rise up to form the mountains,mountains used to be sea bed
@@simonpeyton-n3h Sure if you have tens of millions of years - continental drift is a possibility. But a megatsunami can explain it in a day.
In Australia we have shellfish on mountain ridges over a kilometer high; carried by megatsunamis generated 1.5 million years ago by rockslides triggered by the Oahu mantle plume.
@@imankhandaker6103 continental drift forming the hymalyas isnt a possibillity its a well known proven fact thats still happening today,your theory is correct aswell it seems so we have two theories which disprove the ridiculousness of noahs flood,have u heard of the heat problem?its the ultimate slam dunk in disproving the flood and very interesting
@@simonpeyton-n3hthe heart problem isn’t an issue if you understand Christian cosmology. The fountains of the deep broke open before the windows of heaven, meaning the water didn’t condense from vapor, but from the vast oceans of water in the crust.
Christians arguing against readily observable reality is destroying Christianity. It's funny because this is the result of modern evangelical interpretations of the Bible which was never followed before. Historical revelation includes revelation through reality - the wonder of the trees and stars etc. Now days these crazy people will say that if the Bible says the sun doesn't shine, they will believe the Bible. The Bible doesn't say the sun doesn't shine but tomorrow some evangelical may say it does and they will all start believing there is no sun
Nobody has seen life come from non-life. Time, random mutation and natural selection are incapable of creating genetic information or body plans. Nobody has witnessed macro evolution, only micro evolution, which is just genetic recombination that provides for variations within a kind.
Your wrong evolution has never been observed and never will be we most stay with the facts of what has been observed.
@@alansegger6199LOL...it is observed every day. I think you are struggling on what it actually is.
This is great! This guy is very smart, God bless him. What is his name? It’s not in the notes of the video.
If you read the epic of Gilgamesh it is similar to the noahs ark story though there are differences and Gilgamesh predates be the Noah's ark story. Saying because trees are only 4500 years old that means the earth is only 4500 or so years old I can't say I agree with.how you can prove a god created in 6 days I have no idea other than taking the word of an old book. You can't just use trees for dating the age of the earth you need to look at other things like rocks etc and science has a few dating methods. If someone has evidence other than using the bible then they should take it to the scientific community who can analyse and verify if necessary
but if there was a global flood as described in Genesis 6-9 one *would expect* multiple accounts of it in various civilizations around the world! There's no evidence that the Gilgamesh epic predates the account in genesis and, in fact, the mesopotamian myths have coracles or cubes surviving the global flood (!) whereas the Ark has been rebuilt and shown to be virtually unsinkable by marine engineers. He didn't argue 4500 year old trees demonstrate earth is only 4500 years old
@@stephenglasse2743 I disagree about Gilgamesh not predating. If you look at internet chances are if you look at a religious website they will also disagree with Gilgamesh predating though there are non religious sites that say that it does. I agree though that the two stories may not be true. I don't think they ever found the original ark unless you can tell me different. I think he did reference trees in the video if you look at 2 min 46 to 2 min 56 references the oldest living tree which he is suggesting means the earth is only a few thousand years old.
Taking the Bible literally is NOT recommended. In fact, 2 Corinthians 1-8 cautions against leaning on the Letter (literal reading; the "ink") for it leads to *_Death;_* only the Spirit (the Truth to which the ink points) leads to everlasting life.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
What? "Taking the Bible literally is NOT recommended." The Bible has different literary forms such as poetry, wisdom, prophesy, narrative/historical, etc... Historical information should be read and analyzed from that context.
Jesus took the story of Noah and the Flood quite literally. Matthew 24:37-39, Luke 17:26-27
@@dirtdiver2389 Exactly! Luke 17:26-27 King James Version 26 And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. 27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Jesus makes many references which affirms what had been written.
@@ferdinandagordon223 Excellent! But also question what you read. Ask, "Lord, is there anything else you have to teach me about this?" Look for *_apparent_* contradictions which could -- if you're paying attention -- provoke you into looking for deeper meaning.
When you are humble in this manner, you invoke the Spirit, which *_CAN_* see Truth, while the muddled brain of a mere human cannot see nearly as far.
For instance, the Bible gives us a timeline which is superior to those of science, yet leaves the literal timeline of Ussher and Newton far, far behind. It even tells us the identity of the group which God targeted with the Flood -- a group which went extinct at the approximate Flood date of 27,970 BC.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
@@dirtdiver2389 Yet Jesus did not always teach with the literal method, but with parables.
Thinking non-literally forces you to be *_humble,_* and humility provokes or awakens the Spirit.
Now, do you see where this is headed?
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯