+Nomad Johnson Don't watch it, I have warned you, watch it after playing if you want, they gave out the base story within the first minute, definite no go
I find myself watching reviews of yours for games that I have already owned and completed, genuinely interested to get your point of view haha. Keep on with the magic bro
A baby is drowning in the lake: -Fallout 1 Ask for more information Agree to help Decide not to help Accidentally say something that pisses the NPC off, failing the quest Reveal too much information about yourself, causing the Super Mutants to track your vault more easily -Fallout 2 Ask for more information Agree to help Decide not to help Accidentally say something that pisses the NPC off, failing the quest Pop culture reference about the baby -Fallout 3 Yes, I will save the baby Depends on the caps I will not save the baby [Intelligence] The baby is drowning -Fallout New Vegas I will save the baby I will not save the baby [Barter 30] Double the caps and I'll save the baby [Medicine 30] Thanks to my medical knowledge, I will easily be able to save the baby [Survival 15/30] Uh... yeah, I totally know how to swim -Fallout 4 Yes No (Yes) Sarcastic (Yes)
+Mike the Man Bethesda almost bankrupted them, forced them into a one year development schedule, and then refused to give them bonuses despite the success of the game. I doubt Obsidian wants Bethesda's "generosity" to fix this soulless game.
***** You're a moron. They were facing severe financial issues because their main publisher THQ went bankrupt. The only thing that could have kept them afloat at the time was the bonus, which they missed by going 1 point under on metacritic. Which Bethesda screwed them out of despite giving them less than two years dev time. Ubisoft saved them for the time being by buying the stick of truth and letting them put it out there, even after this they still didn't have enough funds to continue operations. The only thing that saved them from Bethesda's asshole practices was kickstarter growing in popularity as a platform and their success with Pillars of Eternity. This move by Bethesda almost cost one of the best devs to die out.
Sorry but Angry Joe is worthless now for reviews. Completely abandoning what made his channel in the first place with boring sponsored lets plays of trash. Unsubd ages ago from him
The best part about your reviews in my opinion is how thorough each segment is. It's also great going back to reviews like this that are a little older and checking out your analysis. You've passed all the bigger websites ( ign, GameSpot ect) keep up the great work!!
You're quickly becoming my favorite reviewer man. You've never steered me wrong. What's awesome is, you just don't give a shit what the fanbois say. You tell it like it is. "The game has problems but we'll still enjoy it." I also really dig your rating system. Thanks so much for what you do.
Its because Bethesda has this weird thing that while they can create amazing enemies and environments, people's faces have always been pretty ugly. But thats the focus many people have
+Lithus17 compared to everyother game that has been released this year, fallout and mgsv have had the best pc optimization. im not experiencing almost any of the issues ppl are complaing about. the game is a beast.
+Duke Show me ONE AAA game these days that doesn't have DLC soon after release! Doesn't that mean no game is really finished? I agree completely that unfinished games suck and are an insult for the asking price but Bethesda always provides HUNDREDS of hours of gameplay and you think that's not worth 60 bucks? Look at all the games with 4hours of gameplay asking the same price and then tell me how Bethesda is being unfair
seems like a really good game, with the usual Bethesda issues. waiting for patches and mods... (and a new GPU to go High/Ultra...) can you imagine how awesome a CD Projekt RED made Fallout game could be? wow boy. Or one made with the Fox Engine?
Hijynx87 it looks like shit. I have to play it on low settings. MGS V looks way better and runs great. Witcher 3 I also have to play on low and it doesn't run well but at least it looks good. F4 is still a great game, maybe better than W3 or MGS V. But it's one ugly game..
Jake Barry I was just talking about the technological execution. doesn't have to be pretty but people should look like people and move like people and not have horrible textures everywhere
I really don't care about the graphics the gameplay is absolutely phenomenal as along as gameplay is good and no super greedy microtranactions and dlc not released every month and more than 24 hours of gameplay and fallout 4 has way more than that and is called great because of being lucky and not get glitches I'm talking to you Witcher which Fallout 4 doesn't have any game breaking glitches.
+Generic Scout wtf you on about ive played 50+ hours of game play and only been into one tenth of the buildings ive found and only been through one half of the map...
Danish Rayner And most people have only seen 3% of Daggerfall at most. 16 hours in been through 1/3rd of all the locations. And looted the towns almost clean. The place seems smaller than Fallout 3, but everything is more connected. Without the endless maze of tunnels.
i highly doubt that mate i'm level 35 been looting everything i can see and ive barely even touched the map... seen places yes but havn't gone into half of them. So unless you're place on nothing can kill you easy i highly doubt you have been through 1/3 of the map in 16 hours. Its been 50+ hours on hard only died like 5 times and i have barely touched the map and still getting quests constently ive seen places but i havn't gone into like a tenth of them let alone only starting to explore the bottom half of the map....
Only review i´ll watch. Don´t want anything spoiled, don´t even want to see much gameplay. I knew i could count on you Karak! When it launches, i´ll have a toast to your health!
+AngryCentaurGaming My new go to channel for game reviews and other game related things. Do you run this whole channel yourself? If so I find that pretty impressive
Scott Norris They can't be exactly "changed", man, but remade from scratch, and character by character, every single one of them. You can't just reinvent the animations to affect, for example, all of the human characters. Even so, it's something hard to do and affects many things, like hit box, item placement etc. A 2015-Lara Croft style of animation? A Geralt style of animation? Forget it.
The only character animations that can't be modded are when the animations were done with motion capture like Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider. Ya, Fallout has never been known for its animation.....but it is know for having a level of exploration and discovery Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider couldn't even hope to offer in their wildest dreams. Ya, Witcher 3 had a good amount of exploration, but nowhere near the quality or quantity of Fallout. But it all comes down to an individuals preferences (which will deffer from others'). I prefer a game that is fun and keeps me captivated over a game that is super pretty. Fallout 3 had horrible graphics. But there isn't a game out there that has had the impact that Fallout 3 had on me. As for the character animations, the only ones that cant be tweaked without completely recreating them are the ones that are done through body capture like Tomb Raider and the Witcher 3. In games like Fallout where there is no body capture involved, you can do anything with the body and facial animations. That's because the meshes aren't locked into place like body capture software does.
Scott Norris You sure you don't have to recreate the animation from scratch? And even if you don't need to, you still have to modify every single character individually, no? Anyway, top-notch animations are very hard to do, it would take A LOT of effort to improve the animations of every single character in the game, I'm not sure some modders would do it for free. And don't get me wrong, man. I'm much more into Fallout than TW and Tomb Raider, but these games have NEAT animations. Maybe Bethesda should hire better animator, or develop a better engine to work with. Imagine if we had this in Fallout? Game of the decade.
Karak, thank you so much for not only another excellent review, but also one that completely avoids spoilers! I mean, I've already got my copy pre-purchased and pre-loaded that I'm pre-pared to play, but damn if I don't love to hear your opinion on it.
Gamespot ? IGN ? I don't think so, let me wait for ACG review ! Honest review as always. I never pre order games, but i did with F4 so despite graphics (doesn't bother me that much) im glad the game is good !
This game just overwhelms me way too much. I love the game world but I get so damn tired of maintaining my inventory. Its just not user friendly and it causes more stress than anything. I never feel like I can just enjoy the game because I'm too worried about too many little aspects.
+Billy Spencer PC gamer told that the fps shooting is spot on and that later they did not want to use vats anymore...any thoughts ? i mean is it also a viable shooter in first person mode/ironsights ?
Redz are you serious man =?! witcher 3 had really bad movement controls, even with an xbox controller. what a mess it was. im pretty sure f4 will be nothing like that .
Its nice to make some improvements to graphics engines but as the order 1886 showed us, graphics alone don't determine whether a game is good and gamers and critics do a disservice to the game by constantly complaining about fallout 4's graphics
Sithari Warrior It doesn't make the game bad per se, man, but cheap texture is still a flaw, not a merit. I think guys bashing the game because it's not the best out there is bad, but it's also bad when we say that the flaws of the developers don't matter. Of course they matter, we're paying for the game, their getting TONS of money from us, every single detail that was put in the game matters, be it a song, a texture, a mechanic, a key-mapping, everything matters. The game has merits? Yes. What about flaws? Yes also.
Man, over-hyped bullshit. Can't wait for the FO4 trend to stop. I'm glad you shined some truth into the eyes of all these people obsessing into this game. Gamers get burned by the hype train again! You're doing God's work Centaur!
Butt hurt? Who even says that anymore, how old are you? What does purchasing a game have anything to do with anything?...ps. I have a PC. We own everything that's ever been released., don't forget. I'm just agreeing with Centaur, the game isnt what it was hyped up to be.
+dawgyv72 Actually Gamers didn't get "burned" by the hype train, in fact most players enjoy the hell out of it just like they said it would. It isn't a Destiny where it literally bombed itself, Fallout 4 lives up to most of its hype from its fan-base. Hell you would be a dumb-ass expecting a Bethesda game to come out spit-shining and free of bugs and it would be your own fault knocking the game down for it. I have seen multiple reviewers go over the game and complement it on how amazing it is, despite the fact of minor bugs and issues here and there. It isn't a perfect game, no game is, but it sure as hell is better than most.
***** why do you think everyone that is enjoying the game is a Bethesda fanboy? Maybe people actually don't give a shit about graphics. Maybe it's a damn good game when you actually play it (which I have and I don't regret my payment). It deserves the high scores.
Did i spot an option for "facial reconstruction" at around the 3:30 mark? If i can fine-tune my original characters face anytime without having to start the game from the beginning over and over again, i'm really happy to use it, even if it costs me caps. I mean that before DA:I introduced the mirror of transformation in a free DLC, i started that game over maybe 5 times before i was moderately happy with my characters looks. Having played that game now for over 200 hours, it would have been annoying to keep playing with a character whose looks i didn't fully like...
My problem with fallout 4 is that in the 7 years since fallout 3 they did not make any holistic changes in the game whatsoever. The world after 200 years does not feel lived in, it doesn't feel desperate, it doesn't feel dangerous. Death should be a normality. I should die all the time and eventually learn how to survive not by making a gun that does 200 damage, but by learning what works and what doesn't. I don't feel like a bad ass when I walk into a town and kill all the raiders in that town...it breaks immersion for me. I would be a lot more immersed and amazed if death actually mattered, not seen as an inconvenience, but as a fun experience. I would feel like a bad ass if I went into the wasteland and scoured for hour ls and hours nearly escaping death the entire in game day, only to find a few essential supplies. The game being harder by making enemies bullet sponges doesn't work for me. I would rather work my ass off to skillfully dispatch an enemy or two, than spend 5 mins having a back and forth shoot each other 500 times before you die. Also loot is just weak. The game accounts for weight but not for volume, so as long as you are under 250 pounds, you can carry 50 pistols, 200 stimpacks, and 30 grenades. Loot in the wasteland is junk, mostly, but it seems generic and common, realistically find a wrench should be like finding gold! Finding cigarettes should be considered finding a luxury item. There should be unique mechanical, biological, technological loot that is as valuable or even more valuable as a gun. Guns should be considered only for the best, Ammo should be precious, the world doesn't fit, and it doesn't make sense. It's hard to feel immersed. It doesn't take a genius or a particularly creative imagination to think of how a post apocalyptic world would be like 200 years into the future. If that, just imagine a world that is in the aftermath of a catastrophic disaster. I can assure you it is completely different from fallout 3 and fallout 4's universe.
Maybe a year ago Bethesda would've avoided criticism for their games looking 5 years dated on their release dates but now, with games like the Witcher 3, offering a similar RPG experience while looking absolutely gorgeous, Bethesda have to endure this deserved criticism. There's no excuse for a PS4 game to look like a PS2 game, I've played games on the PS3 from 6, 7 years ago that aren't Uncharted 2 and look way better than this. Surely, they have to improve on their graphics cause it breaks immersion.
The games looks fine if not great. Ps2? Played games on PS3 that looks better than this? You are joking right? Bethesda aren't exactly know for their graphics either nor should they ever. Game is just fine with the way it looks. Games play,story and good content is what's most important.
+Matt Josh Last I heard you couldn't fly giant space balloons and shoot pink fluffy rainbows in Witcher 3. Bethesda games are known for their modablity. In fact Fallout 4 is a testament to the mods of New Vegas of of Fallout 3. RTS is a main force behind the settlement building.
+Jody Boles, Except Fallout 4 focuses more on citybuilding then story/narrative. Just look at how bad the dialog system is, how mediocre the side quests and extra content is around the main quests, or how many glitches and frame rate drops in gameplay there are. So, they didn't exactly nail what is most important in a Fallout game.
+Matt Josh I have never cared about graphics, but I gotta say, if you're comparing this to PS2 graphics, something tells me you've never actually played a PS2.
Angelo Gerpel exactly, all main characters had different faces. I don’t care about regular npc’s having unique faces. It’s not necessary. They have smooth animation and that’s more than enough. not even once i felt they were the same character even though they had the same faces.
ACG I love your passion for TW3 so much because I share the same kind of passion. It’s so cool to see someone intelligently breakdown the goods and bads of such a perfect game and give it the respect it deserves. I also do not think it’s inappropriate to compare games to TW3, as it deserves to have that standard set as a benchmark for the quality that other games should strive to have.
+Joshcoshbagosh You think their going to discontinue one of their best titles, a game a damn near sells on name alone? What do you base that on? I'd say there will be another before 2020, meaning this gen.
phil hems I HIGLY doubt that. There isn't much left for them to do with Fallout. This was apparent even after after Fallout 3 and New Vegas. We have seen most of what we really need to see from the Fallout universe. Also, assuming they continue this 4 year in between games formula, no we will not see fallout 5 before the end of the decade. As I said they will most likely be working Elder Scrolls 6 or a new IP. There doesn't need to be another Fallout game. THey shouldn't waste their time and recources on an IP that has nothing left to be explored.
In your opinion. Fact is it's a huge franchise that is having another very successful release. Another half decade will go by and fans will be screaming for another game.
+phil hems I highly doubt we will see fallout 5 in near future, I am also agreeing that next big thing from bethesda is going to be new elders scrolls or new thing, if we don't count dishonored 2,battleborn and doom on which they are already working. With that being said I am in high believe that we will get new fallout in about 10 years. EDIT: It's battlecry not battleborn
TheLowlifeXssassin I know that, is that not considered a fallout game.. Fallout 3 was not that ugly the time of release but New Vegas looked the same as 3 and it wasw like 2010 or something. just horrible to look at
The problem is everyone is going to compare every new game to Witcher 3 now and if it doesn't live up to that game, then it's crap. That about sum it up?
+Trevock1 the problem is that The Witcher 3 came from some underdog developer. Bethesda is one of the Titans. They should be able to make a game as good as CDPR.
Joshcoshbagosh But they did, that's the crazy part i can understand graphics because their running on an old engine that should be revamped but everything else is just fantastic, if not special.
+Eric Nick, What exactly is fantastic?? A lot of the RPG mechanics have been downgraded or are just awful like the dialog system, so it isn't just underwhelming graphics. I just don't see how push the goal post to defend this game when any other game that made the same mistakes as Fallout 4 would get crucified.
I laughed so hard when he said "nothing will take away my enjoyment of dressing up as a space man and discussing drugs with some old half dead fart." XD!
then how is fallout 4 not? you can be a warrior with an axe or a commando with an assault rifle plus many other possibilities. yet in the witcher 3 you're stuck in one role of one witcher geralt. "ROLE playing game" -RPG
Well in that case, Team Fortress could be called an RPG. Fallout 4 is a open world combat simulator, with some very light RPG elements. I'm not saying that it's bad.
We all know Bethesda isn't known for their graphics, the gameplay/story/freedom to do whatever it is you wish is a different story. Just like ACG said, frame rates dropping isn't going to stop people from playing this amazing game (Perhaps the lesser generations will bitch and moan whom are the same ones that think Halo 5 is amazing) in which it's most likely the game of the year. Don't get me wrong The Witcher and MGS5 are both close seconds, But Fallout & The Elder Scrolls hold a special spot in my heart and I've been gaming for a long time, that those titles are so rich and deep and truly put YOU the player in a world so diverse and amazing that its hard for other games to replicate just that. So please don't let "graphics" turn you away from such an amazing game. ACG great vid bud. ONE MORE FUCKING DAY. :)
I'd stick with Fallout any day over The Witcher and MGS, but the graphical differences are very noticeable. Fallout 4 is simply a dumbed down game in terms of graphics, so it can run on Consoles. That's it. But modders will fix some of the problems, so it's not that big of a deal.
+Matheus Moreira Why is everyone relying on modders!? If a game is good, it shouldn't need modders! Mods are for having more fun and stuff not fucking fixing the damn game! I hate Bethesda, feels like they didn't even polish this game and they're just getting away with it because it's Fallout and everyone loves Fallout! This has exactly same problems as Skyrim, I thought they had learned already. But no...Reeeeally dissappointed.
Edward Tigersoul Yeah, I wish it wasn't needed. I've played through New Vegas more than once without mods, but only played Skyrim after heavily modding it. As long as people keep pre-buying games, that's what's going to happen. I don't pre-order anything, I give my money only after some reviews, some demos etc.
The base building is interesting, but is there a point? Do you gain anything from it? I mean, can you raise a community, get more resources, is it tied to the main quest?
Graphics important or not this is just not acceptable this is pure laziness from Bethesda knowing the mods will fix everything especially now that consoles will have them as well. Really disappointed...
If you care that much about graphics, why don't you go play The Order: 1886, or Ryse: Son of Rome? Have fun. You know, when a game has 100+ hours of content, graphics are the last thing I'm worried about.
Stereo Flava Witcher 3 has minimal content and exploration, if you're going to compare it to Fallout 4. The map is filled with useless areas, and some areas have things like flowers to pick for medicine I guess. Witcher 3 and MGS 5 are open-world games, but only loosely, due to the fact that there isn't much to do in world except walk from city to village or outpost to outpost.
you could do a witcher x fallout video, comparing things that can be analized out of fanboyism. thanks for the review... im tired of these youtubers sold asses and their politically correct speech to not lose sponsorships, or trying to make stupid things as the best thing in the world while they laugh at every comma and period...... oh boy :P thanks for not doing that.
+Eugenio Hertz I guess it's not much of a dispute regarding "raw" graphics. I'm more into Fallout than The Witcher, but TW3 takes the cake very easily on the graphics department.
on my first playrtough, in that mission where you track kellog with dogmeat, i remember having to beat dogmeat with a sledgehammer for 30 minutes to get him to finally move. 2015 right there
Very detailed and informative review.You do a better job than most reviewers out there Is there a way or a list to find out if your name is recorded and can be said by Codsworth ?
+Hazard2005 IN the history of...ever I have never had a driver fix these kind of issues. Since I played on the apple 2e when I was like 6. This is a state of needed optomizations.
For those of us who are a bit older, mature and wise, we know not to buy games like this on release day. Remember what a buggy mess Skyrim was when it first released? I will be playing other games for a while, soon this game will be "Game of the Year" with all dlc included and less than half the price. That is when I will buy it. Oh, there is also going to be lots of mods available by then. The real and best Fallout experience won't be ruined, instead enhanced and enjoyed like it should. Cheers.
I have an i5 as well and i have to run it on the lowest settings to get decent framerate and when you are in any vault or inside a close spaced area, framerate drops drastically. Keep in mind though that this is the case when streaming.
Have played 15 hours so far and the game has stayed at a solid 60fps for me. At 1080p Ultra settings on a gtx 780 and 4770k on Windows 10 with latest Nvidia driver.
I'd say the main reason is the stream lined leveling system, technical performance issues, and simplified rpg mechanics. I just picked this game up and honestly I'd say anyone of those complaints are valid, but I must say this one so far is a personal favorite of mine. I dont think it's the best of the series, but i just love the moment to moment encounters I go through while traveling in the game. Guns and combat are pretty damn fun, I love the environment and the varied settlements, and the personal feel of having dialogue spoken out. I do think it's a shame this game simplified leveling up and dialogue options but the concept of fighting various people and creatures in the aftermath of nuclear war is what brought me to the series in the first place, which I feels it delivers on.
I think I may wait a few months for this game, for some reason it just doesn't excite me like new vegas and skyrim did. Also it's a real shame that this game cant hold a stable framerate of 60 at 1080p with a 980, maybe there will be an unofficial patch by the time I buy it.
+Brown Cow A lot of next gen games have been failing to keep 1080p and 60fps. It's kinda sad since this really the only thing next gen can offer, that and of course a larger playground/map.
It didn't excited me too, man. But I think it's about "aging" in my case. When Fallout 3 and Skyrim were launched I was very hyped. Today I'm not that impressed with games anymore, although gaming is my main individual hobby. But yeah, I'll wait for a "collectors edition" with all of the DLCs and stuff.
+Matheus Moreira "But I think it's about "aging" in my case. When Fallout 3 and Skyrim were launched I was very hyped. Today I'm not that impressed with games anymore" I'm in the same boat man
+Brown Cow Just want to say I play this on a GTX 860M and I play with a solid 45 frames on med-high... Some dips when you go inside for some reason. But anyone who says they can't hold 60 frames on a 980 is doing something wrong
+Matthew Tinajero Actually as already stated a ton of times. There are issues all around with various cards. Bethesda has even gone to work on it. So if someones doing something wrong, its expecting every pc to run identical which has never been true lol
Another review I've been waiting for. Great stuff as always and can't wait to get my hands on it. I'm really looking forward to building my town and setting up auto turrets everywhere.
+filterdecay its because they use an old engine. AMAZING for mods. Not so amazing for graphics and animations. THough personally I think the graphics look fine
I honestly think everyone's bitching about graphics because they fell for the advertisements of "Next Gen" gaming and they expect such a product. I feel that this game tried to retain the feel of Fallouts 3 and New Vegas by having some textures look the way that they do, rather than trying to make the most "hyper realistic" game in as far as graphics goes until this date.
Your reviews are the best!! Btw when I said Adam Jenson was the least badass, badass nerd... I meant he is like a complete old school nerds vision of a badass. Not an actual badass. Anyway, keep up the work man, refreshing to have reviews from someone with a fantastic knowledge and opinions on games. Hats off sir! Would I like this game if I'm not a fan of witcher/skyrim? Never played fallout before and I mainly play destiny, rocket league, uncharted, Fifa... ?
Eh i dont see anything exciting enough to make me wanna buy now but i'll make sure to get the inevitable GOTY/ultimate/complete edition with all the DLC eventually.
***** I´m not in a hurry,the experience i get when playing the game will actually be BETTER if i wait because most bugs will be fixed by official or community patches,not to mention that there will be more mods available.
I had 3 crashes before, one of them actually did happen out of nowhere, but the other 2 happened while I was dicking around with console commands, as one would suspect. Other than that, and the aforementioned FPS issues, Fallout 4 still holds a special place in my heart. It's worth buying as soon as possible. Don't forget those mods too *cough cough nude mods cough cough*.
+gaddes scott This game doesn't start slow. Go play a game where tutorials are necessary to continue to play through the game, then you'll see a slow starting game.
gaddes scott That really doesn't prove anything though. I didn't have issues with insects, except for radscorpions, because radscorpions were always a problem in Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
Really like your narration pacing and voice quality, reminds me of NPR radio reporters, telling the news and the worlds story's, good work, appreciate it. I could totally see you as a radio reporter, lol.
This channel is almost like a revolutionary step forward in regards to reviewing games. I just watched the ign review and it was only 5 minutes long. I mean isn't reviewing games their job? Why do their reviews always seem so lazy and shallow? Gamespot is usually a little better but not by much. It just seems like they don't enjoy reviewing games like you do. And you always go in such great detail in your reviews but never spoil anything. You truly know what gamers want to know about games and make it entertaining. Keep up the great work and you'll rise to the big leagues in no time ;D
i enjoyed the video from start to finish. though i already own Fallout 4 so this review cannot sway my opinion on the game, it was a top notch review. you have gained a subscriber today. With the amount of publishers out there willing to pay youtubers to hype this game or that game its always refreshing to find a channel with quality content that doesn't have something to gain from a simple review.
ACG - 17 min review, nothing spoiled
IGN - 7 min review, full of spoilers
+Yogesh Naidu LOL thats awesome hahahaha
+AngryCentaurGaming spread the word man
+AngryCentaurGaming Sure will
man I got so pissed off
+Nomad Johnson Don't watch it, I have warned you, watch it after playing if you want, they gave out the base story within the first minute, definite no go
I find myself watching reviews of yours for games that I have already owned and completed, genuinely interested to get your point of view haha. Keep on with the magic bro
my thanks man
Si Krushner same here!
ACG Great review Mr. Karak!
Si Krushner same
Si Krushner literally right now
A baby is drowning in the lake:
-Fallout 1
Ask for more information
Agree to help
Decide not to help
Accidentally say something that pisses the NPC off, failing the quest
Reveal too much information about yourself, causing the Super Mutants to track your vault more easily
-Fallout 2
Ask for more information
Agree to help
Decide not to help
Accidentally say something that pisses the NPC off, failing the quest
Pop culture reference about the baby
-Fallout 3
Yes, I will save the baby
Depends on the caps
I will not save the baby
[Intelligence] The baby is drowning
-Fallout New Vegas
I will save the baby
I will not save the baby
[Barter 30] Double the caps and I'll save the baby
[Medicine 30] Thanks to my medical knowledge, I will easily be able to save the baby
[Survival 15/30] Uh... yeah, I totally know how to swim
-Fallout 4
Yes
No (Yes)
Sarcastic (Yes)
Disagree about fallout 4 idk wtf you've been playing
he just copy pasted that from somewhere, fishing for likes like the pathetic person he is
He isn't wrong. Fallout 4 is so dumbed down in terms of dialogue, choice and consequence.
Lone Knight nerd
Fallout 4 in a nutshell. Your gameplay choices have now been erased completely...
Didn't even bother looking at IGNs review. Your reviews are literally the best around.
+raman kuner Thanks spread the word on this one Raman
"Maybe framerate will be DLC" :)) omg, I lost it at that.
lol Man so many people hated me for that
Fallout 4 will not let you kill any main character..... which sucks.Or a lot of them.. most of the role playing is also weak.
***** I still like in FONV were even a good guy will kill people, it is so forced in this game.
+Marty The Fallout Guy "so forced" because everyone randomly kills important npcs when they play RPGs.
+Mike the Man
Bethesda almost bankrupted them, forced them into a one year development schedule, and then refused to give them bonuses despite the success of the game.
I doubt Obsidian wants Bethesda's "generosity" to fix this soulless game.
*****
You're a moron. They were facing severe financial issues because their main publisher THQ went bankrupt.
The only thing that could have kept them afloat at the time was the bonus, which they missed by going 1 point under on metacritic. Which Bethesda screwed them out of despite giving them less than two years dev time.
Ubisoft saved them for the time being by buying the stick of truth and letting them put it out there, even after this they still didn't have enough funds to continue operations.
The only thing that saved them from Bethesda's asshole practices was kickstarter growing in popularity as a platform and their success with Pillars of Eternity.
This move by Bethesda almost cost one of the best devs to die out.
***** Obsidian said multiple time they would love to work with Bethesda to make a fallout game.
Thanks again for a very thoughtful well put together review. You are my main source for reviews because of your effort and care you put in.
+Brandon Dame you bet and thanks for the trust man
Angry Joe and yourself are the best reviewers for games on youtube. I just love how honest you are. Keep it up!
+Travis Davids I agree with Karak but Joe screams and yells way too much i can't even watch his reviews anymore.
lol its in the name man xD
+Travis Davids Angry Joe still reviews?
Sorry but Angry Joe is worthless now for reviews. Completely abandoning what made his channel in the first place with boring sponsored lets plays of trash. Unsubd ages ago from him
worth a buy is a great reviewer too 👍 hilarious also
The best part about your reviews in my opinion is how thorough each segment is. It's also great going back to reviews like this that are a little older and checking out your analysis. You've passed all the bigger websites ( ign, GameSpot ect) keep up the great work!!
You're quickly becoming my favorite reviewer man. You've never steered me wrong.
What's awesome is, you just don't give a shit what the fanbois say. You tell it like it is. "The game has problems but we'll still enjoy it."
I also really dig your rating system. Thanks so much for what you do.
i still dont get the complaints about the how the game looks
Look at the faces man
jonn smith
they look way better then fallout 3 or skyrim.
me neither
+Destry Soule Are you console or pc?
Its because Bethesda has this weird thing that while they can create amazing enemies and environments, people's faces have always been pretty ugly. But thats the focus many people have
I'm not getting this game until Bethesda finishes it.
+Lithus17 compared to everyother game that has been released this year, fallout and mgsv have had the best pc optimization. im not experiencing almost any of the issues ppl are complaing about. the game is a beast.
+Duke You cants spell Bethesda without Beta
+Duke Show me ONE AAA game these days that doesn't have DLC soon after release! Doesn't that mean no game is really finished?
I agree completely that unfinished games suck and are an insult for the asking price but Bethesda always provides HUNDREDS of hours of gameplay and you think that's not worth 60 bucks? Look at all the games with 4hours of gameplay asking the same price and then tell me how Bethesda is being unfair
+BaneDain Where is 'bata' in 'bethesda'?
#Fail
remove the hesd
seems like a really good game, with the usual Bethesda issues. waiting for patches and mods... (and a new GPU to go High/Ultra...)
can you imagine how awesome a CD Projekt RED made Fallout game could be? wow boy. Or one made with the Fox Engine?
Hunter Rhyme I meant how much better they are in terms of graphics/animation/bugs than bethesdas games
+Yoni123 The game runs great on pc, he must have been unlucky.
Hijynx87 it looks like shit. I have to play it on low settings. MGS V looks way better and runs great. Witcher 3 I also have to play on low and it doesn't run well but at least it looks good.
F4 is still a great game, maybe better than W3 or MGS V. But it's one ugly game..
+Yoni123 well to be fair. Fallout is post nuclear war. Even tho this doesn't justify anything... the world isn't exactly supposed to be a pretty sight
Jake Barry I was just talking about the technological execution. doesn't have to be pretty but people should look like people and move like people and not have horrible textures everywhere
Dude, you're a review machine! It's impressive how many titles you get to, and all of them get the same concise, informative, witty writing.
+DekuBackPack I try lol. SPread the word man
love your stuff and your choice of words and review method. keep it up man
thanks
The graphics looks like a mixture of old gen tech. Not really that impressive.
I really don't care about the graphics the gameplay is absolutely phenomenal as along as gameplay is good and no super greedy microtranactions and dlc not released every month and more than 24 hours of gameplay and fallout 4 has way more than that and is called great because of being lucky and not get glitches I'm talking to you Witcher which Fallout 4 doesn't have any game breaking glitches.
+Lu Perez Fallout 4's map is kinda small. There's the same content packed inside as previous titles, but hardly the wasteland of the past.
+Generic Scout wtf you on about ive played 50+ hours of game play and only been into one tenth of the buildings ive found and only been through one half of the map...
Danish Rayner And most people have only seen 3% of Daggerfall at most. 16 hours in been through 1/3rd of all the locations. And looted the towns almost clean. The place seems smaller than Fallout 3, but everything is more connected. Without the endless maze of tunnels.
i highly doubt that mate i'm level 35 been looting everything i can see and ive barely even touched the map... seen places yes but havn't gone into half of them. So unless you're place on nothing can kill you easy i highly doubt you have been through 1/3 of the map in 16 hours. Its been 50+ hours on hard only died like 5 times and i have barely touched the map and still getting quests constently ive seen places but i havn't gone into like a tenth of them let alone only starting to explore the bottom half of the map....
Are there any essential NPC's or can we kill everything like in New Vegas
+Nutstabber there are essential NPC's
***** nope, companions are also essential.
+Nutstabber Modders will make everyone killable anyway.
+Mart R. The devs said the dog can die. I wonder if thats true then
AngryCentaurGaming didn't they say they made him unkillable?
Only review i´ll watch. Don´t want anything spoiled, don´t even want to see much gameplay. I knew i could count on you Karak! When it launches, i´ll have a toast to your health!
+Antipersonenmine Thanks man
You should have more subscribers dude!
+Mitsigun Pro appreciate that bro
+AngryCentaurGaming My new go to channel for game reviews and other game related things. Do you run this whole channel yourself? If so I find that pretty impressive
+Cosmonaut yup Cadiz is a friend of mine who does occasional walkthroughs when he has the time. Like AC Syndicate. But its sort of rare.
+AngryCentaurGaming your passion for games is almost as strong as my passion to do nothing
+AngryCentaurGaming You and angryjoe are da bosses of no bullshiting around reviews!
Bethesda open world games NEVER have top notch graphics. They know the modding community will take care of that in just a matter of weeks.
But some things can't be changed, man. You can change textures, but you can't change character animations, for example.
Character animations can be changed. There are a ton of mods out there for character animation.
Scott Norris They can't be exactly "changed", man, but remade from scratch, and character by character, every single one of them. You can't just reinvent the animations to affect, for example, all of the human characters. Even so, it's something hard to do and affects many things, like hit box, item placement etc. A 2015-Lara Croft style of animation? A Geralt style of animation? Forget it.
The only character animations that can't be modded are when the animations were done with motion capture like Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider. Ya, Fallout has never been known for its animation.....but it is know for having a level of exploration and discovery Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider couldn't even hope to offer in their wildest dreams. Ya, Witcher 3 had a good amount of exploration, but nowhere near the quality or quantity of Fallout.
But it all comes down to an individuals preferences (which will deffer from others'). I prefer a game that is fun and keeps me captivated over a game that is super pretty. Fallout 3 had horrible graphics. But there isn't a game out there that has had the impact that Fallout 3 had on me.
As for the character animations, the only ones that cant be tweaked without completely recreating them are the ones that are done through body capture like Tomb Raider and the Witcher 3. In games like Fallout where there is no body capture involved, you can do anything with the body and facial animations. That's because the meshes aren't locked into place like body capture software does.
Scott Norris You sure you don't have to recreate the animation from scratch? And even if you don't need to, you still have to modify every single character individually, no? Anyway, top-notch animations are very hard to do, it would take A LOT of effort to improve the animations of every single character in the game, I'm not sure some modders would do it for free.
And don't get me wrong, man. I'm much more into Fallout than TW and Tomb Raider, but these games have NEAT animations. Maybe Bethesda should hire better animator, or develop a better engine to work with. Imagine if we had this in Fallout? Game of the decade.
Karak, thank you so much for not only another excellent review, but also one that completely avoids spoilers! I mean, I've already got my copy pre-purchased and pre-loaded that I'm pre-pared to play, but damn if I don't love to hear your opinion on it.
+valdin450 You bet. avoiding spoilers is hard but neccesary
Your reviews are the exact ones that actually impact on my decision to buy a game or not. Keep them coming!
+Florin Daniel Vasile Thanks Florin
Gamespot ? IGN ? I don't think so, let me wait for ACG review ! Honest review as always. I never pre order games, but i did with F4 so despite graphics (doesn't bother me that much) im glad the game is good !
+Shevchenkocss hahah thanks
This game just overwhelms me way too much. I love the game world but I get so damn tired of maintaining my inventory. Its just not user friendly and it causes more stress than anything. I never feel like I can just enjoy the game because I'm too worried about too many little aspects.
Well there are mods for that.
i know you said first person is viable, but is third person much improved? great review by the way.You are always the first reviewer I go to.
+Billy Spencer PC gamer told that the fps shooting is spot on and that later they did not want to use vats anymore...any thoughts ?
i mean is it also a viable shooter in first person mode/ironsights ?
+Redz oh that is good.I just had issues with third person in their games and it being hard to see or find some little goodie item on the floor .
Redz are you serious man =?! witcher 3 had really bad movement controls, even with an xbox controller. what a mess it was. im pretty sure f4 will be nothing like that .
u have played and completed fallout 4 ?
you think witcher 3 movement is good ?
+Billy Spencer I felt it was
so what was the rating in the end a must buy orrrr?
+Caleb Adams He said "this is a buy."
+Sean Rawlinson ite thanks
+Caleb Adams it is a broken unfinished game once again just wait for the definitive version next year
+ubit-negra I think what he means is that it has technical problems and that those technical problems mean the game was not ready to be released.
+Ross Wightman i havent met any game breaking bugs
By far the best review channel on RUclips. Always punctual ,informative and well spoken. Made up my mind to buy this now thanks to your review!
+owain Roberts Thank you robters
Fallout has never been about graphics so it doesn't matter
Fallout still has a good story
+Sithari Warrior If that was the case, we could have been playing on the same Fallout 1 engine till this day.
Matheus Moreira I wouldn't want that.
Its nice to make some improvements to graphics engines but as the order 1886 showed us, graphics alone don't determine whether a game is good and gamers and critics do a disservice to the game by constantly complaining about fallout 4's graphics
Sithari Warrior It doesn't make the game bad per se, man, but cheap texture is still a flaw, not a merit. I think guys bashing the game because it's not the best out there is bad, but it's also bad when we say that the flaws of the developers don't matter. Of course they matter, we're paying for the game, their getting TONS of money from us, every single detail that was put in the game matters, be it a song, a texture, a mechanic, a key-mapping, everything matters. The game has merits? Yes. What about flaws? Yes also.
hey did u like the witcher 3 more than fallout 4?
+minos121 dont know
AngryCentaurGaming the witcher 3 is magical apparently u didnt see that magic
+minos121 ya I don't believe in magic
AngryCentaurGaming exactly
+minos121 exactly.
Man, over-hyped bullshit. Can't wait for the FO4 trend to stop. I'm glad you shined some truth into the eyes of all these people obsessing into this game. Gamers get burned by the hype train again! You're doing God's work Centaur!
Lol another butt hurt douchebag who can't afford the game
Butt hurt? Who even says that anymore, how old are you? What does purchasing a game have anything to do with anything?...ps. I have a PC. We own everything that's ever been released., don't forget. I'm just agreeing with Centaur, the game isnt what it was hyped up to be.
I love the game, it's my goty.
+dawgyv72 Actually Gamers didn't get "burned" by the hype train, in fact most players enjoy the hell out of it just like they said it would. It isn't a Destiny where it literally bombed itself, Fallout 4 lives up to most of its hype from its fan-base. Hell you would be a dumb-ass expecting a Bethesda game to come out spit-shining and free of bugs and it would be your own fault knocking the game down for it. I have seen multiple reviewers go over the game and complement it on how amazing it is, despite the fact of minor bugs and issues here and there. It isn't a perfect game, no game is, but it sure as hell is better than most.
***** why do you think everyone that is enjoying the game is a Bethesda fanboy? Maybe people actually don't give a shit about graphics. Maybe it's a damn good game when you actually play it (which I have and I don't regret my payment). It deserves the high scores.
Did i spot an option for "facial reconstruction" at around the 3:30 mark? If i can fine-tune my original characters face anytime without having to start the game from the beginning over and over again, i'm really happy to use it, even if it costs me caps.
I mean that before DA:I introduced the mirror of transformation in a free DLC, i started that game over maybe 5 times before i was moderately happy with my characters looks. Having played that game now for over 200 hours, it would have been annoying to keep playing with a character whose looks i didn't fully like...
+markotark yes you did
Gosh, I can't tell you how many times I restarted DAI for that exact reason. God bless the mirror of transformation
My problem with fallout 4 is that in the 7 years since fallout 3 they did not make any holistic changes in the game whatsoever. The world after 200 years does not feel lived in, it doesn't feel desperate, it doesn't feel dangerous. Death should be a normality. I should die all the time and eventually learn how to survive not by making a gun that does 200 damage, but by learning what works and what doesn't. I don't feel like a bad ass when I walk into a town and kill all the raiders in that town...it breaks immersion for me. I would be a lot more immersed and amazed if death actually mattered, not seen as an inconvenience, but as a fun experience. I would feel like a bad ass if I went into the wasteland and scoured for hour ls and hours nearly escaping death the entire in game day, only to find a few essential supplies. The game being harder by making enemies bullet sponges doesn't work for me. I would rather work my ass off to skillfully dispatch an enemy or two, than spend 5 mins having a back and forth shoot each other 500 times before you die.
Also loot is just weak. The game accounts for weight but not for volume, so as long as you are under 250 pounds, you can carry 50 pistols, 200 stimpacks, and 30 grenades. Loot in the wasteland is junk, mostly, but it seems generic and common, realistically find a wrench should be like finding gold! Finding cigarettes should be considered finding a luxury item. There should be unique mechanical, biological, technological loot that is as valuable or even more valuable as a gun. Guns should be considered only for the best, Ammo should be precious, the world doesn't fit, and it doesn't make sense. It's hard to feel immersed. It doesn't take a genius or a particularly creative imagination to think of how a post apocalyptic world would be like 200 years into the future. If that, just imagine a world that is in the aftermath of a catastrophic disaster. I can assure you it is completely different from fallout 3 and fallout 4's universe.
Survival mode is perfect for you man
You deserve so much more subscribers man! I never leave disappointed when I watch your review videos!
+Dave0fcourse thanks
Amazing reviews dude. Really well written. How long does it take to make a full review?
i never knew people played Fallout in 3rd person. like more than just to laugh at the ice skating. maybe ill have to try it.
Vanilla FO4 base-buiilding is terrible. It was clearly thrown in last minute and has no impact on the world or story.
mikvance it's not only difficult to use and clunky, but the lack of the game rendering an interior cell makes it annoying at times.
Maybe a year ago Bethesda would've avoided criticism for their games looking 5 years dated on their release dates but now, with games like the Witcher 3, offering a similar RPG experience while looking absolutely gorgeous, Bethesda have to endure this deserved criticism. There's no excuse for a PS4 game to look like a PS2 game, I've played games on the PS3 from 6, 7 years ago that aren't Uncharted 2 and look way better than this. Surely, they have to improve on their graphics cause it breaks immersion.
and yet the ps4 can't play it at 30 gps
The games looks fine if not great. Ps2? Played games on PS3 that looks better than this? You are joking right? Bethesda aren't exactly know for their graphics either nor should they ever. Game is just fine with the way it looks. Games play,story and good content is what's most important.
+Matt Josh Last I heard you couldn't fly giant space balloons and shoot pink fluffy rainbows in Witcher 3. Bethesda games are known for their modablity. In fact Fallout 4 is a testament to the mods of New Vegas of of Fallout 3. RTS is a main force behind the settlement building.
+Jody Boles, Except Fallout 4 focuses more on citybuilding then story/narrative. Just look at how bad the dialog system is, how mediocre the side quests and extra content is around the main quests, or how many glitches and frame rate drops in gameplay there are. So, they didn't exactly nail what is most important in a Fallout game.
+Matt Josh I have never cared about graphics, but I gotta say, if you're comparing this to PS2 graphics, something tells me you've never actually played a PS2.
Its hard to get use to NPCs faces after playing the Witcher 3, they got the realism of facial expressions and faces down right on.
+TN Dang I agree with this
Apart from the main characters every npc had the same face, don't know what you guys are talking about
Angelo Gerpel exactly, all main characters had different faces. I don’t care about regular npc’s having unique faces. It’s not necessary. They have smooth animation and that’s more than enough. not even once i felt they were the same character even though they had the same faces.
ACG I love your passion for TW3 so much because I share the same kind of passion. It’s so cool to see someone intelligently breakdown the goods and bads of such a perfect game and give it the respect it deserves. I also do not think it’s inappropriate to compare games to TW3, as it deserves to have that standard set as a benchmark for the quality that other games should strive to have.
This is my go-to review channel. No biases, no spoilers, no bullshit. I love it, keep doing you Karak!
+Ian Hughes thanks man
consider me subbed one of the most informative and honest reviews I've ever heard
+Krash Drummer thanks
Every time I think of buying a game I always come to you first , keep up the great work
thanks man
yep me too
So when's fallout 5?
+itzzNay probably wont be one. THis is likely their last Fallout game. Next we will get either Elder Scrolls 6 or something new
+Joshcoshbagosh You think their going to discontinue one of their best titles, a game a damn near sells on name alone? What do you base that on? I'd say there will be another before 2020, meaning this gen.
phil hems I HIGLY doubt that. There isn't much left for them to do with Fallout. This was apparent even after after Fallout 3 and New Vegas. We have seen most of what we really need to see from the Fallout universe. Also, assuming they continue this 4 year in between games formula, no we will not see fallout 5 before the end of the decade. As I said they will most likely be working Elder Scrolls 6 or a new IP. There doesn't need to be another Fallout game. THey shouldn't waste their time and recources on an IP that has nothing left to be explored.
In your opinion. Fact is it's a huge franchise that is having another very successful release. Another half decade will go by and fans will be screaming for another game.
+phil hems I highly doubt we will see fallout 5 in near future, I am also agreeing that next big thing from bethesda is going to be new elders scrolls or new thing, if we don't count dishonored 2,battleborn and doom on which they are already working.
With that being said I am in high believe that we will get new fallout in about 10 years.
EDIT: It's battlecry not battleborn
Fallout is one of those ugly games that are just sooo good
Remember New Vegas
+Edwin Vasquez, Obsidian made Fallout New Vegas, not Bethesda.
TheLowlifeXssassin I know that, is that not considered a fallout game..
Fallout 3 was not that ugly the time of release but New Vegas looked the same as 3 and it wasw like 2010 or something. just horrible to look at
Fallout new Vegas is more of a "fallout" game then 3 or 4.
More fallout 1 and 2 then 3.
***** That is true, crazy how it's Obsedian
+Edwin Vasquez
How is that crazy? Fallout was never a bethesda franchise.
Most detailed and informative review that I have seen all day. Keep it up!
+Wade Francis Goodrick thanks wade
one question- do towns actually feel like they're well- populated?
+ccharlot lol no
+AngryCentaurGaming
cheers for replying!
jeers to the answer : (
+AngryCentaurGaming btw, good review as always
+ccharlot thanks
"Fallout 3 New vegas"...
That made me flinch.
The problem is everyone is going to compare every new game to Witcher 3 now and if it doesn't live up to that game, then it's crap. That about sum it up?
People are idiotic and are just plain ignorant.
+Trevock1 the problem is that The Witcher 3 came from some underdog developer. Bethesda is one of the Titans. They should be able to make a game as good as CDPR.
Joshcoshbagosh But they did, that's the crazy part i can understand graphics because their running on an old engine that should be revamped but everything else is just fantastic, if not special.
+Trevock1 yes
+Eric Nick, What exactly is fantastic?? A lot of the RPG mechanics have been downgraded or are just awful like the dialog system, so it isn't just underwhelming graphics. I just don't see how push the goal post to defend this game when any other game that made the same mistakes as Fallout 4 would get crucified.
I laughed so hard when he said "nothing will take away my enjoyment of dressing up as a space man and discussing drugs with some old half dead fart." XD!
+fallenfreak828 Glad you liked it fallen
i love your reviews. always honest, informative and just the correct length. keep on truckin my friend
+Swee Teo thanks Teo
This channel is becoming my go-to place for reviews. Very informative, outstanding work.
+Feekra King Becoming? LOL all kidding aside thanks! Spread the word
This is the best review on RUclips at the moment IMO.
+unnaturalone Appreciate that Unatural
Humor, no spoilers, as well as a detailed rundown of the specs. You sir, are my official go-to review channel.
Great review man, thank you for great content . And big congrats for hitting 70k subs!
+MrAbelandcain thank you spread the word man. I need this one to hit big
Amazing review!!!! How would you rate it compared to FO3 and NV?
+Mart R. Better than both interest wise.
AngryCentaurGaming alright, awesome! thanks for responding :)
great job with the review. very informative as usual.
+6644pmr thanks 66!
Fallout 4 is not an RPG, I'm glad you didn't call it that way.
Let me ask you something. Do you consider witcher 3 as an rpg?
Yes absolutely.
then how is fallout 4 not? you can be a warrior with an axe or a commando with an assault rifle plus many other possibilities. yet in the witcher 3 you're stuck in one role of one witcher geralt.
"ROLE playing game" -RPG
Well in that case, Team Fortress could be called an RPG. Fallout 4 is a open world combat simulator, with some very light RPG elements. I'm not saying that it's bad.
I guess you're role playing as Geralt
We all know Bethesda isn't known for their graphics, the gameplay/story/freedom to do whatever it is you wish is a different story. Just like ACG said, frame rates dropping isn't going to stop people from playing this amazing game (Perhaps the lesser generations will bitch and moan whom are the same ones that think Halo 5 is amazing) in which it's most likely the game of the year. Don't get me wrong The Witcher and MGS5 are both close seconds, But Fallout & The Elder Scrolls hold a special spot in my heart and I've been gaming for a long time, that those titles are so rich and deep and truly put YOU the player in a world so diverse and amazing that its hard for other games to replicate just that. So please don't let "graphics" turn you away from such an amazing game. ACG great vid bud. ONE MORE FUCKING DAY. :)
I'd stick with Fallout any day over The Witcher and MGS, but the graphical differences are very noticeable. Fallout 4 is simply a dumbed down game in terms of graphics, so it can run on Consoles. That's it. But modders will fix some of the problems, so it's not that big of a deal.
+Matheus Moreira Why is everyone relying on modders!? If a game is good, it shouldn't need modders! Mods are for having more fun and stuff not fucking fixing the damn game! I hate Bethesda, feels like they didn't even polish this game and they're just getting away with it because it's Fallout and everyone loves Fallout! This has exactly same problems as Skyrim, I thought they had learned already. But no...Reeeeally dissappointed.
Edward Tigersoul Yeah, I wish it wasn't needed. I've played through New Vegas more than once without mods, but only played Skyrim after heavily modding it. As long as people keep pre-buying games, that's what's going to happen. I don't pre-order anything, I give my money only after some reviews, some demos etc.
Bloodbourne has chance for game of year. It was a excellent. There has already been a GOTY edition announced for it.
How long have u had it before release date?
The base building is interesting, but is there a point? Do you gain anything from it? I mean, can you raise a community, get more resources, is it tied to the main quest?
+RogerioMartins87 Yes, yes and yes
Graphics important or not this is just not acceptable this is pure laziness from Bethesda knowing the mods will fix everything especially now that consoles will have them as well.
Really disappointed...
+Stereo Flava Don't think the consoles will be able to handle better textures, maybe retextures of the same resolution but even then.
If you care that much about graphics, why don't you go play The Order: 1886, or Ryse: Son of Rome? Have fun.
You know, when a game has 100+ hours of content, graphics are the last thing I'm worried about.
+Matt Grupp I played witcher 3 and look at those graphics. and the game also has 100+ hours of quality content what say you now ?
+Matt Grupp exactly man and then theyll try to say "well the witcher 3....." stfu and go play the witcher 3 then.
Stereo Flava Witcher 3 has minimal content and exploration, if you're going to compare it to Fallout 4. The map is filled with useless areas, and some areas have things like flowers to pick for medicine I guess. Witcher 3 and MGS 5 are open-world games, but only loosely, due to the fact that there isn't much to do in world except walk from city to village or outpost to outpost.
you could do a witcher x fallout video, comparing things that can be analized out of fanboyism. thanks for the review... im tired of these youtubers sold asses and their politically correct speech to not lose sponsorships, or trying to make stupid things as the best thing in the world while they laugh at every comma and period...... oh boy :P
thanks for not doing that.
Witcher 3 is my favorite story driven action RPG other than Mass Effect 2 and KoTOR.
+TheFly212 lol, Derp. posted before I finished.
I'm very excited for FO4,.I know it will be great and can't wait to play it. :-)
+TheFly212 Excellent choices. TW3 and ME2 are my favourite games ever
+Candid Enigma Pure greatness. Cheers.
+Eugenio Hertz I guess it's not much of a dispute regarding "raw" graphics. I'm more into Fallout than The Witcher, but TW3 takes the cake very easily on the graphics department.
on my first playrtough, in that mission where you track kellog with dogmeat, i remember having to beat dogmeat with a sledgehammer for 30 minutes to get him to finally move. 2015 right there
Only came across this channel fairly recently but wonderfully in depth reviews, including this for Fallout 4. Great stuff sir!
+Citizen Sleeve appreciate that
+AngryCentaurGaming No problem, you have an excellent review structure, are honest & have a great voice for commentary. Glad I found your channel!
+Citizen Sleeve Thats awesome to hear man. Always stoked to know someone likes the content
Very detailed and informative review.You do a better job than most reviewers out there
Is there a way or a list to find out if your name is recorded and can be said by Codsworth ?
+Jude Thomas appreciate that
Are there even any drivers out for FO4 yet?
+Hazard2005 no
+AngryCentaurGaming Pretty sure once the drivers are out it will fix some if not most of the optimization problems, least I hope.
+Hazard2005 IN the history of...ever I have never had a driver fix these kind of issues. Since I played on the apple 2e when I was like 6. This is a state of needed optomizations.
+AngryCentaurGaming I should have said performance instead of optimization. Cause optimization is indeed something that comes from patches.
+Hazard2005 There's an Nvidia driver that came out today for Fallout 4.
The only reviewer I trust! Time to pre-load this baby!
+Anne Kromhout Thanks
For those of us who are a bit older, mature and wise, we know not to buy games like this on release day.
Remember what a buggy mess Skyrim was when it first released? I will be playing other games for a while, soon this game will be "Game of the Year" with all dlc included and less than half the price. That is when I will buy it. Oh, there is also going to be lots of mods available by then. The real and best Fallout experience won't be ruined, instead enhanced and enjoyed like it should. Cheers.
+Nightceasar I'll wait for "ultra hardcore survival" mods THEN the game can begin. *grin*
i have a i5-3570k 3.4Ghz and a HD 7870 2GB and 8gb of ram. What will my preformance be at medium-high settings?
I have an i5 as well and i have to run it on the lowest settings to get decent framerate and when you are in any vault or inside a close spaced area, framerate drops drastically. Keep in mind though that this is the case when streaming.
I have the same cpu and ram. I have a 4gb gpu though, I run everything on ultra.
+Nathan Speedy What happens if a PC with 4GBs of ram tries to run the game?
VoyeurTheNinja mm not sure. But i think now day you just need 8...
Have you considered overclocking that CPU?
I just wanted to say I recently discovered this channel and that I am really enjoying your method of reviewing ACG. Keep up the good work
+Jack Walsh Thanks jack
Have played 15 hours so far and the game has stayed at a solid 60fps for me. At 1080p Ultra settings on a gtx 780 and 4770k on Windows 10 with latest Nvidia driver.
there are a lot of people who hate this game... Idk why i love it! The issue is the bugs and that's about it.
I'd say the main reason is the stream lined leveling system, technical performance issues, and simplified rpg mechanics. I just picked this game up and honestly I'd say anyone of those complaints are valid, but I must say this one so far is a personal favorite of mine. I dont think it's the best of the series, but i just love the moment to moment encounters I go through while traveling in the game. Guns and combat are pretty damn fun, I love the environment and the varied settlements, and the personal feel of having dialogue spoken out. I do think it's a shame this game simplified leveling up and dialogue options but the concept of fighting various people and creatures in the aftermath of nuclear war is what brought me to the series in the first place, which I feels it delivers on.
I've never played any of the Fallout games. But I'm interested in this one.
Right
I watched 8 different reviews for Fallout 4. This is by far the best and with no spoilers. Keep up the great work.
+marcusfenixation thanks marcus tell others if you can
+AngryCentaurGaming Done bro !
For really honest straight forward reviews. I either come here, Kinda Funny Games, or GT Reviews... great review man
+Andre Frazier Thanks
I think I may wait a few months for this game, for some reason it just doesn't excite me like new vegas and skyrim did. Also it's a real shame that this game cant hold a stable framerate of 60 at 1080p with a 980, maybe there will be an unofficial patch by the time I buy it.
+Brown Cow A lot of next gen games have been failing to keep 1080p and 60fps. It's kinda sad since this really the only thing next gen can offer, that and of course a larger playground/map.
It didn't excited me too, man. But I think it's about "aging" in my case. When Fallout 3 and Skyrim were launched I was very hyped. Today I'm not that impressed with games anymore, although gaming is my main individual hobby. But yeah, I'll wait for a "collectors edition" with all of the DLCs and stuff.
+Matheus Moreira "But I think it's about "aging" in my case. When Fallout 3 and Skyrim
were launched I was very hyped. Today I'm not that impressed with games
anymore"
I'm in the same boat man
+Brown Cow Just want to say I play this on a GTX 860M and I play with a solid 45 frames on med-high... Some dips when you go inside for some reason. But anyone who says they can't hold 60 frames on a 980 is doing something wrong
+Matthew Tinajero Actually as already stated a ton of times. There are issues all around with various cards. Bethesda has even gone to work on it. So if someones doing something wrong, its expecting every pc to run identical which has never been true lol
HK-47 should be in this game
Permission to destroy the insolent meatbag, master?
permission granted :P
HK-47 was such an entertaining character and honestly i think in the context of the fallout universe would work
+Swarth2300 Maybe the mods could fix that.
+Swarth2300 a star wars mod for this would be grand
He kind of is. find the robot vendor in Goodneighbor
You are quickly becoming one of my favorite video game reviewers. I love the way you structure your reviews! Really great review here! Thank you!
Appreciate tha bro
Another review I've been waiting for. Great stuff as always and can't wait to get my hands on it.
I'm really looking forward to building my town and setting up auto turrets everywhere.
Great 'non spoiler' review. Subscribed and look forward to looking at your previous videos, can't believe I didn't stumble upon this channel sooner.
+Visor UK Thanks so muc hman
Another great review! You just sold me on this, I wasn't going to get this because I didn't like fallout 3 but this looks better
+ferraro38 thanks glad you liked it
Thanks for the review. Ill just say it. Bethesda has poor art direction. We all have felt it since oblivion. Always behind the curve.
+filterdecay its because they use an old engine. AMAZING for mods. Not so amazing for graphics and animations. THough personally I think the graphics look fine
+Joshcoshbagosh you said it man
The hovering dog at 13:39...
+Aaron Alegria its magic
I honestly think everyone's bitching about graphics because they fell for the advertisements of "Next Gen" gaming and they expect such a product. I feel that this game tried to retain the feel of Fallouts 3 and New Vegas by having some textures look the way that they do, rather than trying to make the most "hyper realistic" game in as far as graphics goes until this date.
Your reviews are the best!! Btw when I said Adam Jenson was the least badass, badass nerd... I meant he is like a complete old school nerds vision of a badass. Not an actual badass. Anyway, keep up the work man, refreshing to have reviews from someone with a fantastic knowledge and opinions on games. Hats off sir! Would I like this game if I'm not a fan of witcher/skyrim? Never played fallout before and I mainly play destiny, rocket league, uncharted, Fifa... ?
... Generally I skip story cut scenes and like to just play.
thanks
I love mass effect and Deus ex though!
As always, the best review on the web! Hands down!
+Konrad Sakowski thanks
I am going to wait for sale even though I think it is worth $60. I am just broke lol.
In canada, games start at 80 bucks and Fallout is now down to 50 so i'm amazed to see that the price in the US is still 60$!
JoComeau696 , it was on sale for $30 last week.
Great! Sorry if you could not get it that low!
I bought it online from target for less than $30 last week
Eh i dont see anything exciting enough to make me wanna buy now but i'll make sure to get the inevitable GOTY/ultimate/complete edition with all the DLC eventually.
+Pedropars lol wait 2 years then
+Pedropars wait till there is a huge mod library.......
*****
I´m not in a hurry,the experience i get when playing the game will actually be BETTER if i wait because most bugs will be fixed by official or community patches,not to mention that there will be more mods available.
+Pedropars Thats probably true
Worth it.
Dude your channel has become my one and only go to for gaming reviews! Keep up the fantastic work!
+villblackberry thanks man
I had 3 crashes before, one of them actually did happen out of nowhere, but the other 2 happened while I was dicking around with console commands, as one would suspect. Other than that, and the aforementioned FPS issues, Fallout 4 still holds a special place in my heart. It's worth buying as soon as possible. Don't forget those mods too *cough cough nude mods cough cough*.
For a game this vast I think the graphics are just fine
games starts off so slow but i've reach level 30 now and can't put it down.
I don't know how fighting a death claw amounts to "starting slow"
+gaddes scott pretty much started off getting my ass kicked by bugs lol - now im lvl 40, bugs... pfft!
+gaddes scott This game doesn't start slow. Go play a game where tutorials are necessary to continue to play through the game, then you'll see a slow starting game.
*****
read xXx Loki xXx reply
gaddes scott That really doesn't prove anything though. I didn't have issues with insects, except for radscorpions, because radscorpions were always a problem in Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
Gotta say characters don't look like they did in the trailers/ demo.
+Godly Gohan I agree with this. Typical trailer crap
Keep doing the lord's work.
I've come to enjoy your reviews as much (and sometimes more so) as Gamespot, IGN, and GT Reviews.
+James Blackwood Thanks
Really like your narration pacing and voice quality, reminds me of NPR radio reporters, telling the news and the worlds story's, good work, appreciate it. I could totally see you as a radio reporter, lol.
Fallout 4 rules! Been waiting for a game like this since skyrim! #bethesdafanboy! #proudofit!
fallout 4 is a great game.
This channel is almost like a revolutionary step forward in regards to reviewing games. I just watched the ign review and it was only 5 minutes long. I mean isn't reviewing games their job? Why do their reviews always seem so lazy and shallow? Gamespot is usually a little better but not by much. It just seems like they don't enjoy reviewing games like you do. And you always go in such great detail in your reviews but never spoil anything. You truly know what gamers want to know about games and make it entertaining. Keep up the great work and you'll rise to the big leagues in no time ;D
+Im2spec1al thanks 2spec. Tell others if you can man
I sure will
Does the UI include Oregon Trail?
i enjoyed the video from start to finish. though i already own Fallout 4 so this review cannot sway my opinion on the game, it was a top notch review. you have gained a subscriber today. With the amount of publishers out there willing to pay youtubers to hype this game or that game its always refreshing to find a channel with quality content that doesn't have something to gain from a simple review.
+dan grimm Thnaks glad you liked it
Absolutely love his over the top, descriptive hyperbolic adjectives. It's like classy vulgarities.