This a just a quick video on a FREE and Very fast editing method, let me know below what your thoughts are on GraXpert...😁👍🏼 Link to everything featured in todays video: GraXpert: graxpert.com/ GraXpert Beta: github.com/Steffenhir/GraXpert/releases Seestar S30: store.seestar.com/DAMON Telescope Live: bit.ly/46WDy0U
Don't forget SeestarS50 now has mozaic mode that allows you for better higher resolution images in angle you want that got better at reducing bad corners and widening the fov
For a lot of new owners of the Seastar and to astrophotography, myself included this is a very informative video. The crunch statement being "with a more than capable desktop computer" . For most people the process will take a lot longer than 23 seconds.
I'm new to astrophotography and I want to buy a telescope from Celestron's AstroMaster series. Do you think this telescope is suitable for observing deep space objects?
Thank you sir for the information. I'm just now really trying to get into deep sky photography as it's quite a bit different than the planetary photography that I have been doing the last couple years. It's almost like I have to unlearn what I've already learned.
Loving these video’s .. is there an app for iPhone that could do a similar edit for the S50, so it’s all done on the one phone or iPad ? Keep up the great work and reviews. ✨😎✌🏻
it's true what he says... in the end it's all 'photoshop BS'. It always comes out in B&W and you have to do the rest. even JWST pictures are all touched up in Photoshop
Here's my thing about all these editing. Isn't it making your pic fake. I mean you can make any object moon Mars galaxy look great without a seestar. If editing is taking out noise and bringing out the real object without smoke and shiny objects I'm good. When your editing on this software are you fabricating an image to enhance or are you taking a raw image and taking out the noise without altering the real pic. I could never understand this. I mean does the bubble edit or any other scope are we looking at a fabricated galaxy or a raw galaxy minus noise. I want a real picture not a fake pic.
El S30 es peor telescopio que el Dwarf, mas barato sí, pero mucho peor. El S50 hace unas fotografías mas cercanas a telescopios mas profesionales, sobre todo con el modo mosaico. Creo que ZWO se ha equivocado con el lanzamiento al mercado de un telescopio inferior, el s30 es inferior en todo al S50. Yo tengo el S50 y personalmente me decepcionan mucho las capturas del S30
I have both and they are both real astrophotography. You’re taking photos of space. The Seestar runs just like my Skywatcher GTI with a scope and DSLR connected to a ASIAIR. The Seestar doesn’t track as well because it doesn’t need a polar alignment being an alt azimuth, but it takes photos and a lot of them are impressive for a cheap device. You taking a photo of the moon with your camera is real astrophotography as well..
This a just a quick video on a FREE and Very fast editing method, let me know below what your thoughts are on GraXpert...😁👍🏼
Link to everything featured in todays video:
GraXpert: graxpert.com/
GraXpert Beta: github.com/Steffenhir/GraXpert/releases
Seestar S30: store.seestar.com/DAMON
Telescope Live: bit.ly/46WDy0U
Any chance you have a wiki or article or write up on these steps and new features?
Don't forget SeestarS50 now has mozaic mode that allows you for better higher resolution images in angle you want that got better at reducing bad corners and widening the fov
For a lot of new owners of the Seastar and to astrophotography, myself included this is a very informative video.
The crunch statement being "with a more than capable desktop computer" . For most people the process will take a lot longer than 23 seconds.
These tutorials are very important for people getting into astrophotography
Thank you for taking the time to help them out ❤
I'm new to astrophotography and I want to buy a telescope from Celestron's AstroMaster series. Do you think this telescope is suitable for observing deep space objects?
Excelente programa de procesado
Superb.
Thank you sir for the information. I'm just now really trying to get into deep sky photography as it's quite a bit different than the planetary photography that I have been doing the last couple years. It's almost like I have to unlearn what I've already learned.
How does the seestar compare to the dwarf 3?
Awesome!
Hi Damon I have a question for can you take a picture of messier 87 through your 1500$ telescope ❤
When HAF125/Juwei17 review?
Still waiting for the Juwei 17 review
How do you stack the images from telescope live? Do i stack red, green, blue and luminosity separately? Then how do i combine them into one image?
I like how they come straight from the s30. I don’t feel they need tweeking. They are still great looking pictures in my mind.
Installed it, there's no deconvolution menu?
EDIT: it's there in the beta
also with the Sky-Watcher S11610 Classic 200P Dobsonian telescope do you have to take short expousures do to its size?
Dose it have the milky way
Hi, do you know when they will the S30 be shipped? I ordered mine a couple of weeks ago but haven't heard anything yet
Damon scotting i am getting a Sky-Watcher S11610 Classic 200P Dobsonian telescope for xmas,i will finally start astrophotography.
Doesn't FWHM stand for Full Width Half Medium?
No, it stands for Full Width at Half Maximum. It's the width of the star profile halfway to the peak.
Loving these video’s .. is there an app for iPhone that could do a similar edit for the S50, so it’s all done on the one phone or iPad ? Keep up the great work and reviews. ✨😎✌🏻
it's true what he says... in the end it's all 'photoshop BS'. It always comes out in B&W and you have to do the rest. even JWST pictures are all touched up in Photoshop
More real I want 100 💯 real.
Here's my thing about all these editing. Isn't it making your pic fake. I mean you can make any object moon Mars galaxy look great without a seestar. If editing is taking out noise and bringing out the real object without smoke and shiny objects I'm good. When your editing on this software are you fabricating an image to enhance or are you taking a raw image and taking out the noise without altering the real pic. I could never understand this. I mean does the bubble edit or any other scope are we looking at a fabricated galaxy or a raw galaxy minus noise. I want a real picture not a fake pic.
W
w
Sadly another computer limited editor 😴
El S30 es peor telescopio que el Dwarf, mas barato sí, pero mucho peor. El S50 hace unas fotografías mas cercanas a telescopios mas profesionales, sobre todo con el modo mosaico.
Creo que ZWO se ha equivocado con el lanzamiento al mercado de un telescopio inferior, el s30 es inferior en todo al S50. Yo tengo el S50 y personalmente me decepcionan mucho las capturas del S30
Seestar or skywatcher gti? I'll probably buy the gti learn some real astrophotography...
Good for u bro
Can you define what astrophotography means for me please
I have both and they are both real astrophotography. You’re taking photos of space. The Seestar runs just like my Skywatcher GTI with a scope and DSLR connected to a ASIAIR. The Seestar doesn’t track as well because it doesn’t need a polar alignment being an alt azimuth, but it takes photos and a lot of them are impressive for a cheap device.
You taking a photo of the moon with your camera is real astrophotography as well..