Toby’s a Pro at Teaching Political Analogies | The West Wing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 июн 2024
- “Don’t bug me.”
Season 3 Episode 1: Isaac and Ishmael
WATCH NOW: MAX
www.max.com/shows/west-wing/3...
Subscribe now:
/ @thewestwing
This is the official “THE WEST WING” channel! Stay up to date on President Jed Bartlet and his White House staff’s most inspiring, unforgettable moments.
#TheWestWing #VoteBartlet #Drama #JedBartlet #AaronSorkin #MartinSheen
Isaac and Ishmael, a special episode following 9/11, not part of the series.
I'm leaving an Apple for The Teacher who picked this particular clip to share with The West Wing Classroom In RUclips!......Thank You! 🍎
The section at 1:40, accurate in the early 2000s, accurate in 2021. Time is a flat circle.
Did you get that time right? Because it's a horrible analogy. The Taliban didn't try to exterminate the citizens of Afghanistan.
@@Stolpmeister The part with "terrorism always fails" also looks dumb as hell after afghanistan
@@Stolpmeistertake a closer look at the superpower who created the Taliban in the first place
@@johnbowden4761 Even then it was dumb as hell. The Good Friday agreement was 3 years old.
@@omnibeet true! very good point
The months and years after 911 were a very weird time, kids.
This is such a good episode
Such a good episode. Even better knowing that this wasn't part of the series and was made right after 9/11. Kids today should watch this episode imo. It touches on so many relevant things that are still part of our society today.
One of my favorite episodes. The First Lady explaining Isaac and Ishmael's story is perfect.
Exactly, thank you for that reminder. I was not a fan of the West Wing, but did catch that episode. The short version for others that are unfamiliar with this story, it’s from the Book of Genesis. Abraham (Abram) was childless. His wife Sarah (Sara) was around 77 years old, in the words of Scripture, “well past childbearing age”. Sarah felt that God prevented her from bearing children to her beloved husband. Sarah had an Egyptian slave named Hagar. Sarah told Abraham to “visit” Hagar after which Hagar bore Abraham a male child who was named Ishmael. Ishmael was the apple of his father’s eye (American slang) and Abraham doted on the young boy. Because of this favoritism, Hagar became more bold with Abraham’s attention. When Abraham was 99 years old God sent and Angel to tell Abraham that he will bear the progenitor of a chosen people, however, that will not be the descendants of Ishmael. The Angel told him that child will be borne of Sarah who was already 90. Abraham didn’t believe that, neither did Sarah who overheard what was said. Sarah laughed at the notion, hence the name Isaac. Sarah grew jealous of Hagar and Ishmael within their household and demanded that Abraham send Ishmael and Hagar away. This trouble Abraham because he loved his son. God reassured Abraham that Ishmael would also be the progenitor of a great people of great numbers. So Abraham sent Hagar and Ishmael into the desert with only a few containers of water. When the water was gone, Hagar pleaded with God to save Ishmael. God reassured Hagar and opened a huge well and oasis for them. Ishmael married an Egyptian woman when he became of age and his descendants went on to become the Semitic people of the MidEast (other than the Jews).
Abbey Bartlett, the First Lady, explained this story to the young interns (much shorter version). She concluded by telling them the fractious relationship between the Muslims and the Jews boils down to basically a family feud. Both great people (the Christians being the “wild branch” of Judaism - Romans 11) have Abraham as the original Father of their Faith.
That, my Friends, explains the great hostility and might give those that NEVER went to Sunday School the historical context of today’s events.
"And so it began: The Jews the sons of Isaac, the Arabs the sons of Ishmael." The sad tone of Abby's voice when she says this.
I love this show. Thank you for uploading these clips.
Don't be too quick to thank them. These little nuggets are an attempt to generate new interest in the series and get people to buy a season, or the entire run.
@@tomscott4438 ok
4:00 - poor Sam has significant difficulty opening that bag of corn chips.
1:43 Toby here means YET…
Sam's statement that terrorists always fail did not age well in Afghanistan.
It didnt even age well when it aired. Terrorism is wildly successful. As an Irishman, I would point to the fact that 100 years ago we lived under british rule and now do not.
The whole episode was written from a "rah-rah America" point of view when, in fact, terrorism was successful multiple times and not all gang members were consenting of being in a gang or proud of doing so (i.e. Charlie's little speech).
@@realitycheck8321 As a result of the Irish War of Independence, not terrorism per se. Granted, the IRA committed acts which could be characterized as terrorism both before and during the course of the conflict, but then again so did the RIC (and later the Black & Tans), and to a far greater degree. Even as an Englishman I would call it an example of a successful campaign of asymmetrical warfare waged by irregular / paramilitary troops against an occupying force, rather than terrorism as we understand it today.
"Not only do terrorists always fail at what they are after, they pretty much always succeed in strengthening whatever it is they're against." Interesting. I wonder if it's true. I hope so.
Toby is channeling his inner Monty Python, what have the roman's ever done for us?
I remember this clip most for the Grammer mistake in it Islamic extremists are to Islamic to...... When it should extremists are to islam
"recognized" government
"What do you call a society that has to worry that at any moment, the pizza place they're at is going to blow up?"
"Israel."
There'd be a lot less risk if the ?pizza place" wasn't built on land taken from others by force.
Oh Toby...your naivete shows. We recognized Stalin in the 1940's because we needed an ally against the Nazis. We supported many a dictator--we even recognized the Taliban prior to 9/11 for their anti drug efforts, trying to hand over $43 million dollars to grease a Unical pipe deal. We shouldn't deal with rogue nations? Imagine one that waged nuclear war on another nation, has a long history of slavery, forments coups d'etat amongst its neighbors...should anyone deal with that nation? The Hashissians were also hired out by the Crusaders when they couldn't reach the Muslim neighbors. First terrorist act could be the tarring and feathering of tax officials working for the crown, but someone can likely add in something even early depending on how we define terrorism. Sam isn't entirely wrong about terrorism's failure rate.
The Crusaders could hire the Assassins because they needed money to defend their Shiite sect (the Nizari Isma’ili) from the main Shiite sect(s). They still exist. They are now notorious for running hospitals in the Islamic world and their previous leader/Iman marrying Rita Hayworth.
Hi reference to the Laker Girls would not fly in 2024.
Why?
Nor should it...
This episode doesn't age well, in part because of the problems others have noted, and partly because it was slapped together so fast: Aaron Sorkin didn't want the intended season 3 opener, "Manchester," to air as scheduled on September 26, just over two weeks after the 9/11 attacks. So they delayed "Manchester," and put this together, more an intellectual exercise than an episode of drama. I skip this one when I rewatch the series: the oversimplified and sometimes off-base historical commentary, Presidential Classroom students as a device allowing the regular characters to deliver monologues in turn, Josh's teasing/bullying of Billy in front of the other students (but it's "okay," because he encourages him later in private -- sheesh) -- pass. But it's always good to take a few minutes enjoying Richard Schiff as Toby Ziegler.
the secondary story is even worse, showing Leo being prejudicial against and arab man who works in the white house and just happens to have the same name as a person of interest.
@@potterpotty01 And as with Josh's single final comment to Billy that's supposed to excuse his earlier bad behavior, Leo's line "Way to be back at your desk" is supposed to make up for his (out of character) racism and xenophobia. If Sorkin's point was that, under the circumstances, people react irrationally, I don't think it worked particularly well.
Why is everyone hanging on Toby's and Sam's every word? Do the people in the room understand that they're the main characters of the show?
They are students selected to meet the president and the Whitehouse is on lockdown for some reason concerning terrorism. So they are just learning different perspectives on terrorism while they wait for the lockdown to lift and meet the president.
Bizarre non-history. Sicarii were somewhat successful terrorists in Roman Israel (they precipitated their desired revolt, albeit unsuccessful in the end), the Hashisheen (not "the first terrorists" by any definition) wielded enormous influence for over a century until erased by the Mongols, and Ireland attributes the success of its republican project to the armed struggle of the IRA and IRB which in turn inspired the Hagenah and other groups in successfully establishing Israel despite UK opposition using terrorism. As mentioned below the Taliban has outlasted the US using terror, despite being BTFO militarily.
I am not that knowledgeable about ancient sicariis but it modern history terrorism itself has 100 failure rate.
In your reply u somewhat miss the point that thing 1 happening after thing 2 doesn't mean it happened because of it.
Al qaeda and its subsidiaries terrorized pretty much every part of the globe and achieved nothing. Isis did the same thing and achieved nothing. But those who transform themselves from the ways of harm and become politicians instead of murderers can than build more or less functioning society. Like they did it in Afghanistan.
Ireland btw is not good example imo. To much fringe groups battling not outsiders but themselves inside the country.
Sorkin's track record for depicting Muslims in The West Wing is pretty awful. Was there ever anyone who wasn't a terrorist or terrorist sympathizer?
Yes, there was, and in this very episode. That was the whole point of Leo's scenes.
This whole scene is utterly preposterous and ahistorical. He says terrorists ALWAYS fail and in the next sentence says Israel is a nation that has to live in constant fear of terrorism. Israel WAS LITERALLY FOUNDED BY UNDERGROUND TERRORISTS. The King David hotel didn’t just go boom for no reason, and innocent Palestinian villagers didn’t get mutilated and shot by non-existent phantoms at Deir Yassin and other massacres.
No, the state of Israel was founded by Jews from Israel and many other countries fleeing persecution. The British were warned about the bomb in the King David and chose to ignore it. And YAWN... always the historically incorrect Dir Yassin citation. The only thing that is "utterly preposterous" is your flawed statement.
Any MAGA supporters watching this?
This was a great episode and a great moment.But philosophically it's fundamentally wrong. Islamic Terrorism is actually deeply rooted in the Quran and has widespread support among is llamists around the world.
By The KKK was a social / political organization that actually had very little to do with Christianity. It never had widespread support even in the south where it was most active. And while it is true the KKK used terror tactics Those tactics were never used against entire populations But we're instead targeting small groups and individuals.
To compare the KKK to modern islamic terrorism Is is a tragic philosophical in intellectual error. The only thing they truly had in common is that both were fundamentally bad.
If the KKK had the means to terrorize larger groups of black people, I'm sure they'd relish the opportunity. It certainly helps that there weren't enough black people to fight back.
Islamic Terrorism is rooted in an interpretation of the Quran the same way Christian terrorism is rooted in a different interpretation of the Bible.
The historical context of both are too entirely different to talk about in a meaningful way. But just because the KKK was "targeting small groups and individuals" doesn't mean they weren't using the Bible as justification.
"Never used against entire populations"? You've clearly never heard of the Tulsa Massacre.
If you do not learn from History, you are doomed to relive it. In September 11, 2001, Muslem extremists highjacked four passenger jets. Flighing them into the twin towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. In 2024 after an attack by hamas at peace loving Jewish residents, Americans are protesting in favour of hamas. I respect Muslems, most are regular humans just wanting to feed, clothe and house themselves and their families. But to support Iranian backed terrorists is suicide, doesn't the USA know that after taking out Israel and Europe, Extremists want to take out America?
Not all Palestinians are Hamas, Palestine is more than Hamas.
"... Americans are protesting in favour of Hamas" - the fact that you don't even have the balls to accurately describe what it is they're *actually* protesting is proof in and of itself that you're absolutely full of it. Israel is murdering foreign aid workers, denying food and medicine to woman and children and bombing civilian infrastructure and you wanna call them "peace loving" lmao. Legit clown-tier take.
it's quite possible to be anti war, anti netenyahu, anti kidnapping people but still believe the Plalestinian people do not deserve what is happening to them. tere are just as many anti hamas Palestinians as there are anti war Isrealies. your statement of saying america is protesting in favour of Hamas is false and inflamatory.
the one thing Sam says is right, the more they try and eliminate Hamas, the more civilians killed by Isreal, the more they will embolden support against Isreal.
@@ohpurpled Palestinians in Gaza are Hamas. they voted for them. Teachers, doctors and UN staff -they hide hostages in their homes. HAMAS.
Lets maybe not glorify this episode with clips. It was heat of the moment angry islam bashing that has aged HORRIBLY.
Exactly the opposite of what this episode was
Not even close, and this clip (like this show) have aged very well. They weren't bashing islam, just pointing out that ANY religion (when radicalized) can be dangerous and destructive. Look what's being done in India and the radicalization of hindu, or America with the radical Christian right. Justifying violence in the name of god, is timeless.
you are so wrong, and you can see by the first example they mention the KKK.
They talk about how muslims are good people but the radicals are the ones doing these acts.
Clearly never seen the episode lmao
watch the episode again. you've forgotten it.