Well people got what they wanted. The coming of Chaos truly brought the calamity and suffering people wanted. It just wasn’t the kind they were expecting
Oh by the way I don't know if this is intended or just a horribly game breaking bug but whenever Greasus enters the realm of Khorne he enters it right off the bat with an almost maxed out Bloodshed meter without having fought any armies at all. Thank you CA.
Except that doesn't happen and the guys in the race spawn in different portals depending on their faction. Greaus enters the realm and he will most likely fight a necromancer stack that spawns close to him and which grants plenty of bloodshed. So nothing wrong here. You can bring up other bugs, but you can't say Greasus getting bloodshed and not fighting is a bug, because he fights and you only see his bar on your turn as he had a battle with a rogue army by the time you check up on him. An undead rogue army which crumbles instead of routing which leads to more bloodshed as there's no enemies running away.
@@sol155 The moment you enter a Chaos God's realm you cannot move your army for the remainder of your turn. So pray tell why has Greasus Goldtooth consistently entered Khorne's Realm with an almost full Bloodshed meter in my games? If it hasn't happened to you that's great but do not presume to tell me it doesn't happen when I've seen it with my own two eyes.
@@vigil2150 Looks like you didn't bother reading what I had just said. Did I say he moved? Nope, and he is greasus and he can spawn near a necromancer army which attacks him. Just like an army in the realm of khorne can attack the player in their turn when they hadn't moved. Bloodshed is based on kills and damage inflicted, skeletons are many and undead always crumble. Are you saying you were never attacked on your turn in the realm of khorne when you couldn't move and just entered? Are you saying the AI can't experience it? Greasus came in, he was attacked by an army with high HP pool and lots of entities in the end turn and he didn't, nor couldn't move, all those enemies died and he got bloodshed, where's the bug? Perhaps you can show one screenshot with the rogue army leader alive. "Sa'ved" and greasus has bloodshed just by entering.
My game had horrible performance with my cooler running wild and CTD already at launch that I stopped after nearly 40 hours… but I never had those horrible glitches ofc
@@klavicus2276 How can you play with no blood for longer than a hour :D Literally WH2 is the same but in better, well I hope the EA period finally ended with their DLC.
I was confused when I saw Erwin Rommel at like B-tier, I don't have a good knowledge of WW2, but he got his ass handed to him at the siege of Tobruk. By some dude who was called Leslie Morsehead.
@@Tacom01 To be fair, the British in North Africa(at least early on) were kinda out matched in competency and in tank battles(which were very important). British tanks were just out gunned and out ranged by their German counter parts in which I think at one point after Tobruk a large quantity of tanks were supplied to British forces in order to lead several counter offensives. From memory I remember "Crusader" and "Churchill" were the main tanks supplied. One of which was more of a light tank and the other a heavy tank that was more for infantry support as it didn't really have the firepower against tanks. I think at least one of the counter offensives was called operation "Crusader" or "battle axe" which whatever they were called was for the most part unsuccessful even with Germany withdrawing/forgoing support to the theatre of North Africa and focusing more on invading Russia. No doubt Rommel was a inspiring, energetic, competent general; but I doubt he was something special enough to go into B-tier. I guess it was just his fame and him gaining the nick name "The Desert Fox". I only really know about the siege of Tobruk and some surrounding details on that theatre due to a certain book I read, so I don't know anything about his victories in France. I just know that he wasn't able to crack Tobruk initially against Morsehead who I don't think is a name of recognition like Rommel's, whilst also dedicating his resources to taking that fortress due to its precious port. Whilst Tobruk was very important, he spent too much time and resources trying to grind it down when he should have avoided such a death trap. I would recommend finding a map/picture that details the defences of Tobruk under Morsehead, it definitely had the German tanks in mind ;).
@@liamclifforth7046 Ulysses S. Grant is in B-tier as well, a man who was so inept at strategy and maneuver he was called The Butcher by his own troops. He won by throwing men and materiel at the South until he ground them down, the man was about as far from a "strategist" as one can possibly get. I wouldn't put much stock in that list.
Units in general need to not be so damn finicky when it comes to taking a swing. They did this in WH2 as well and I was never entirely certain my units were ever actually fighting.
Legend had a great doomstack video about that recently with Skarbrand. When he was completely surround by infantry (humans), Skarbrand just didnt seem able to attack anyone despite towering above the mob and having large wings
I just tested it with a terracotta sentinel and a great unclean one (Because they are very slow and show this clearly) and my god. The terracotta does his charge attack into the center mass and scatters the infantry, then didn't swing for 6 seconds, picking one individual person killed them, then took another 6 seconds to pick another. Every time he chooses a target he has to turn slightly, extending his attack time from 4seconds to around 6-7s which is like, 30-40% less dps. The great unclean is just as bad. He doesn't scatter infantry on his charge much, so he doesn't actually turn around much since he keeps most enemies in front of him. But he has a large forward arcing melee attack that he CONSTANTLY chooses to throw at the corners of a formation. almost 40-60% of his splash damage seems to be wasted. He rarely ever takes a swing at center mass. It actually hurts his overall dps and therefore, means he takes longer to fight and more damage. They should just make large single entities attack the cell containing the most entities or something, since that would be the most efficient (and logical) way to wipe out grouped enemies smaller than you. Even a mindless daemon would be smart enough to think "I'd rather kill 5 men than 1 at a time".
Btw that auto-resolve thing has been going on on their updated games. I noticed that the AI gets ridiculous auto resolve strength in Shogun 2 with a half stack against my full that I later annihilated in less than 2 minutes.
I had been playing a Greasus campaign for 200 ish turns and went to get the last demon soul in Nurgle's realm. I autoresolved the demon prince battle and won. Then, my army was teleported back to the mortal realms, and I still didn't have the soul. I went back in there again and won against the gardener again and I still did not get the soul
I feel awful for the people playing on Legendary difficulty. People need to be ready to save scum in order to protect their campaigns from game-breaking bugs
@@zocker1600 But they want to sell us DLC and new factions, that is were most of their money and model come form. Which is actually good because it pressures them to make a GOOD game. They can't one pump and run on us if they want to cash in like Warhammer 2 did.
@@iforgotmyname1669 you're right but it still sucks that they are pushed to release unfinished and unpolished products cuz they gotta hit those Q1 performance metrics. Fuck the modern vidya game industry man :(
Well my coolers did run wild even in Troy (which doesn’t happen when I play other games like shooters for some reason you might know, but I don’t) but I never had CTD in Troy (didn’t play latest patch so no glitches in warhammer but never had those in Troy anyway)
It's not that collision doesn't exist, it's the new mass feature not being fully balanced properly yet. Infantry units will not walk through an infantry unit (which they would with no collision), but anything with mass can basically just barrel through. Tweak those numbers and that issue is fixed.
Worse than the collision is the atrocious pathfinding, the way units move when they find a path and how they can barely attack when they reach their goal. Also Sieges have become even more annoying than in warhammer 2 with infinite range towers everywhere and always forcing blobs with little strategy. And now not even tier 1 settlements without walls are safe from it. Field battles always were the most interesting and they barely exist anymore.
Eh, this was a problem in TWW2, too. 2 Skaven lords with no troops, one of which is at half health: Hoh? Are you approaching me? The Autoresolve says close defeat, and yet you are approaching me? Full stack Lizardmen army with small garrison: I can't beat the shit out of you for a decisive victory without getting closer.
The funny thing is that before Warhammer 3’s release I hadn’t played a total war game before only watched the various content creators in the community. So it would appear that I chose the perfect time to get into the series… By purchasing Warhammer 2 (and 1 for mortal empires but YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN)
Warhammer 2's launch was pretty bad also, but that game is amazing now. I would recommend just playing Warhammer 2 for a few weeks until Warhammer 3 is patched if it's giving you problems.
I hope they do an overhaul to the main campaign mechanics, the rifts feel like such a chore and the fact you have to rush to gather the 4 souls sucks, the AI seemingly gets the souls in like 2 turns after the rifts open so you have to rush it all.
It's crazy how many bad design choices went into making Warhammer 3. Did no senior employee see the Realms of Chaos and think "a lot of people might hate this." I'm still in awe that so many people enjoy the siege battles
@@RobertusMaximus I would love to see a behind the scenes during the development. The idea of the rifts and going to the chaos realm is cool, but it feels like it was a last minute addition almost. There’s so much they could do with it, so either they will or I’m sure modders will in the future.
@@RobertusMaximus The Realms of Chaos isn't as bad as people make it out to be, it's an objective based campaign and people are piss that they have to play to the objective. They could spawn fewer rifts, but other than that i don't think it's as bad a people are making it out to be. Also the siege battles are a lot better than the shitty field battles we got instead of minor settlement battles. The siege battles are one of the best parts of the game.
Hear me out on the siege battles ... why are these minor settlements designed to let enemies waltz in from every possible direction? Some maps have four entrances and others have eight. It makes zero sense from a defensive standpoint and kills the immersion for me. The supply system makes me never want to play another survival or siege battle. Respawning overpowered towers & glitchy barricades. Why would they have every barricade and tower connected to a supply point instantly explode when the attacker captures the point? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills trying to engage with these siege battles.
Rome 2 was quite worse. Unplayable basically. While here a bug is something like units not responding for 3 seconds or a manticore glitching out mid dive due to air/land toggle issues. On rome 2 a whole unit may die because they dismounted a ship by shooting themselves off it. Really puts into perspective about how modern rome 2 shows that if you threaten a company with boycott enough they will turn coal into diamonds
I swear I can barely make out the models of my units, especially in snow regions. I have also found I despise the siege towers to high hell. Their insane range and no collision makes me fairly angry every time I realize that the reason one of my units is losing men is because 2 towers on the opposite side of the map are up and have me in their sights with magical telescopes. Also sometimes magic jets off in a random direction? I thought it was my mistake at first that heavily damaged my own units with the Tempest biting wind, but I've had multiple times where it just launches in a different direction. I think it has something to do with nearby impassable terrain, but I still need to experiment.
I'm not sure I'll be doing that series for Warhammer 3. I would need Creative Assembly to fix the core issues of the game which might not be possible on the Warscape engine.
You didn't buy Total War Warhammer 3 because it's buggy and unfinished and the current campaign is broken and not in a fun way. I didn't buy Total War Warhammer 3 because my computer would probably blow up. We are not the same.
Yep, people kept saying "the sieges are shit because the AI couldn't handle the old ones!" And all I can think is "yeah well the new sieges are shit AND the AI can't handle them"
If CA imported the minor settlements from Troy and the major settlements from either Three Kingdoms, Thrones or Shogun 2, I'd probably give it another chance
Been playing third age total war dac ago since a few days now ive been having a blast. Medieval 2 mod. Having more fun than tww3 thats for sure. Atleast medieval 2's engine felt like things have mass and impact. While holding formations and lines. Shame the zoom zoom gameplay of today's market ruined these titles so badly. When playing tatw in retrospect i can cearly see why these issue's matter. Siege battle slug fests overall just feel better even with crappy ai.
@Fourthspartan56 i mean, i heard that was mainly due to some salty people review bombing it for no valid reason, besides the bad frames on the campaign map I hear battles have no frame issue somehow
@Fourthspartan56 that just comes from the expectations after WH2... For a CA launch WH3 was fine. Did not expect the game to be playable to be honest. And for me it was. Will, like always, take a few large patches until it becomes okay, and a few years until its great.
@@thebaron9405 Chinese review bombed it, because CA had a stroke of genious and gave it to random large streamers to try out before launch. Many who never played a Total War game. And many Total War streamers got nothing... Community went crazy. Understandable in my opinion.
I heard rome 2 was...way worse, but hey also it appeared that some people had problems, others had the game working fine, and like we know, no total war launch is perfect and us a community should find every bit of jank and report it to CA
I have to give the devs credit that they focussed on developping things modders cant change like faction and campaign mechanics, but i still dont know why stuff like climate is in the game, the number of people who complain about not getting any replenishment on their units due to climate is off the charts not to mention force march still being able to be performed when a unit has some movement left, enabling the AI to run past your armies while still attacking, turning the game in an army goosechase
@@RobertusMaximus Dammit, I hope you're jocking, because this doesn't make sense. I like the idea of winning battles before the enemy reinforcements arrive, but to lose an army because of what you said sounds really awful...even for the AI!
@@lorenzocassaro3054 even worse I think Legendoftotalwar said if the AI get wiped before reinforcements, the reinforcement army still survives. But the same rule doesn't apply to the player.
Here's a tip. If you order an army to attack an enemy, but you know they'll retreat, and you can't catch them, hit the backspace button right as your army enters their command circle. This effectively "locks" both armies in place. If the AI doesn't just attack you, you'll have your full movement to chase down their retreat on the next turn. The AI obeys this command circle blocking, instead of just ignoring it like it does if trapped by mountains and such, thankfully.
@@LordVader1094 Yes it does look better the lighting and SSAO in WH3 is currently bugged on plenty of maps. This was pointed out by plenty of RUclipsrs before release.
@@LordVader1094 It 100% does look better on my system I can run troy at near max settings in 4K WH3 I have to drop every setting as low as I can except texture detail and drop my res to 1440p Tell me, which of the games would look better in that situation?
1:44 Yeah the auto resolve cheats are infuriating Like I get it for early game but when you reach the point where you just want to paint the map and you're pretty much done this sh*t is gonna make you take so mich more time for no reason (especially with as big immortal empires will be), the cheats should be scaling down as turns go on imo, so playing battles early game is rewarding as it should but is not as needed in the later stages of the campaign
I pray that CA can turn this around, that eventually after enough updates and patches, that this game can truly be as great as all of us hoped it would be. Or at the very least not a downgrade from warhammmer 2.
The best that Warhammer 3 will ever be is probably an expanded Mortal Empires from Warhammer 2. The core issues will not be solved unless done by a mod team. I had my fun with Warhammer 2. If Creative Assembly can't improve the core issues affecting the real-time battles, I'll just move on to other games and save my wallet
@@RobertusMaximus that seems a little extreme, especially since the entire community isn't even experiencing the same issues, I haven't seen 90% of the pathfinding issues you displayed in the video and the charge mass system needs one patch to make it not ruin formations. Apart from that a few optimization patches should clear up the other issues that I agree should not have been present. I'm also annoyed by the patching system but I'm given to understand that's actually a steam issue not a CA issue. All in all there are many improvements to this game over two and 90% of my issues can easily be fixed by mods so im not worried about it.
@@RobertusMaximus I'll do the same. CA shat the bed with this one and the market is extremely competitive these days. Why should we ever believe in anything they do when they cannot even learn from their own TWW2 and they don't listen to advice? TWW3 was supposed to be so easy. TWW2 with some new additional mechanics, a new map, and an interesting campaign. Instead we got a buggy extended mod with no re-playability.
@@Dragonus91 I dunno... that would still mean you have multiple AI lords sitting there recruiting full stacks constantly. Making the AI have unlimited money.
Well that's what they are doing :D AI can often afford 2 armies just by owning single minor settlement, so imagine how many armies major faction can have by mid / late game
@@Dragonus91 I do know XD Just dealing with Kostaltyn having 5 armies running around whilst only having a few minor settlements... then instantly coming back with a full stack of tsar guard and streltsi.
i wish you would have included the famous "The game is broken ea sports" meme but made a Creative Assembly version of it. But 10/10 video anyways really puts to show why you should always wait for the initial launch the settle in, instead of pre-ordering
I'm always impressed how societies that pump AAA titles keep introducing bugs in features that have been present for several titles with the same level of class they would have if it was the first time.
With all the design choices, and all that, it's as if they fired all senior staff and brought in new people that had never played a Total War before, "Here's the recipe, make a new cake with it."
Oh yeah Arthas was a much better effin villain. CA could have pretty much copy-pasted his story but instead Prince boy takes up the sword of evil, goes mad with determination and kills his brother because he heard a deep voice that one time.
@Airitech I completely agree, I got far enough to access the final battle with Kairos and I can't do anything to succeed in it. I find it baffling that I have to manually do the battle when all the other shit survival battles could be auto'd. On one hand I get it that it's the grandiose final battle but I don't want to endure half an hour every single time I wanna take a crack at the battle just to say I won and for my reward to be Belakor on a leash.
I personally really love trying to defend great bastion maps and losing when 1 kurgan stands on the leadership point despite my whole army sitting on the main victory point.
My PC is pretty outdated so I dont get to complain about performance but the biggest one I have is the unit responsiveness. Its like there's a 10 second delay between giving a command then unit starting to move. Also Tzeentch realm should be reworked entirely and I still dont get how the rifts work after you finish the campaign. Like they keep popping up and I get messages that another faction got four souls and I have to stop them but A. Thats bullshit cause I have Belakor and B. When I enter a rift I cant go to the forge of souls. What should happen is that no more rifts open up and you just get to sandbox but right now I dont even understand what does happen.
@@RobertusMaximus So many easy fixes like just remove the chaos realm debuff make them give rewards. Other stuff is just unfishied like finishing the campain should give a bigger and customized reward. Like Skarbrand gets redeemed and gets his wings back, Tzeentch can see everything and gets a stop time spell or something, Kugath gets a superplague, Ogres get like a limited resource of godmeat that gives them superbuffs when they eat it, summer comes for Kislev, giving a bunch of growth and untainted everywhere,... Would all help replayability or give you a reason to continue playing after finishing the story.
I mean...why should they keep opening up, if by then Ursun's already been freed (or eaten) in the first place? Weren't they supposed to be opened by his roars?
@@lorenzocassaro3054 Yeah for some factions the bear objective is a bit of a stretch. Also I had another idea, cause I do like the teleport option through rifts. Why dont they give Belakor a trait (cause he doesnt even have one right now) that controls the rifts? Like no rifts open up in friendly territory but Belakor can open them at will. My longest campain is with Skarbrand and its superfun to just teleport max lvl Skarbrand with a doomstack into the heart of Kislev or Cathay and just raze everything. If Mortal Empires is gonna be as big as they say, some teleport mechanic would be handy there too.
OH yes, I also had that. I personally had to restart legendary Kislev like 3 times before I was able to win the rift campaign (then lost the domination one 'cause Tzeentch had 44 settlements somewhere and sent 10 or so full stacks constantly, who teleport around and ambush attack my armies in encampment stance) I sent Katarin to stop one AI from entering the forge. I finish the battle and go out. Then like 4 turns later another AI collects the souls so I enter the portal and defeat them. The first AI enters immediately after. THen I lost anyway because you need your faction leader in two places at once. Then the campaign where I won the short campaign I've got a bug where I enter the realm of Slaneesh. I see the demon prince come just after me, so I decide to set up ambush at the portal exit. He teleports down....and now neither of us can move or attack. 2 turns later Kugath enters the portal, teleports down and zoom past us. My army was stuck there for 10 turns until Ku'gath reached the damn soul.
sometimes if my pc has been on too long the game just crashes as i load it so i have to restart my pc everytime i want to play it, and by too long i mean like 3 hours
@@RobertusMaximus look man,...I guess I'm really biased towards WH, it's definitely bad right now. A lot of those bugs you pointed out I never encountered or I just never realized them
I would be happy if they fix the annoying camera which can not stay on the same hight and units actually following orders instead of forgetting them whenever they encounter any enemy nearby.
I haven't had any issues with crashes, or major bugs. The only thing that annoyed me in how lords are worse at getting into combat against larger units and tend to just get cycle charged to death in less than 60 seconds even with guard mode turned off.
CA promised us to complete "Trilogy" with "hang" but even I didn't expect it to be so negative one. Settlement battle are harder than capitols thx to unlimited towers workshop AI is presenting us, poor graphics customizations and bugs like not able to click buttons if resolution of the game is not the same as your desktop resolution, units standing even if you command them to attack, mindless Chaos Realm design aka Nurgle rebuff Kugath when that guy is in his Realm and so on. Warhammer 1 has similar issue but they weren't so dramatic as here.
The Warhammer 3 game design choices (Realms of Chaos campaign + Siege Rework) are bewildering. What's even more bewildering is that Creative Assembly allowed its anticipated CASH-COW product to launch in this state.
Pro tip: You can disable the spawn of chaos agents and armies from the rifts AS WELL as make it impossible for the AI to collect souls (they will still be able to enter the realms, just won't be able to win the boss battles) Or alternatively disable the rifts completely. Just search how to do it and look got a reddit guide, it takes 5 mimutes at most.
These problems seem to be only happening to players on a 50/50 ratio cause half of the players who got this aren't encountering these bugs, meanwhile the others are currently dropped into nurgles porcelain throne.
Ah Creative Assembly, one of the many AAA developer that releases "early access" games while calling it a full price product. They are on Ubisoft's level of fuckery when it comes to this. I wish the game best of luck in the future and hopefully at the time when immortal empires comes out everything will be fine. But considering the state mortal empires turned out at first, I have my doubts. 4x games and cRPGs really do have a tendency to be an absolute nightmare on launch, too bad those are my favorite genres :/
ngl I can see now why ppl complained 😂 my game had no lag, no graphic bugs and runs at constant 60 fps around. Well let's pray for those that got issues that the next patch will fix most of it
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Well people got what they wanted. The coming of Chaos truly brought the calamity and suffering people wanted. It just wasn’t the kind they were expecting
Just as planned.
Truly, Tzeentch has won the great game.
Okay thats funny XD
@@aprinnyonbreak1290 he would probably self sabotage it if it was him, afterall if it's only him then change will never come
Just incase u didnt know, tzeentch broken the 4th wall and sabotaged the game
Oh by the way I don't know if this is intended or just a horribly game breaking bug but whenever Greasus enters the realm of Khorne he enters it right off the bat with an almost maxed out Bloodshed meter without having fought any armies at all. Thank you CA.
I feel like this follows the nuclear ghandi principle
he just came prepared with meals for the way, and slaughters em as soon as he arrives
Except that doesn't happen and the guys in the race spawn in different portals depending on their faction. Greaus enters the realm and he will most likely fight a necromancer stack that spawns close to him and which grants plenty of bloodshed. So nothing wrong here.
You can bring up other bugs, but you can't say Greasus getting bloodshed and not fighting is a bug, because he fights and you only see his bar on your turn as he had a battle with a rogue army by the time you check up on him. An undead rogue army which crumbles instead of routing which leads to more bloodshed as there's no enemies running away.
@@sol155 The moment you enter a Chaos God's realm you cannot move your army for the remainder of your turn. So pray tell why has Greasus Goldtooth consistently entered Khorne's Realm with an almost full Bloodshed meter in my games? If it hasn't happened to you that's great but do not presume to tell me it doesn't happen when I've seen it with my own two eyes.
@@vigil2150 Looks like you didn't bother reading what I had just said. Did I say he moved? Nope, and he is greasus and he can spawn near a necromancer army which attacks him. Just like an army in the realm of khorne can attack the player in their turn when they hadn't moved. Bloodshed is based on kills and damage inflicted, skeletons are many and undead always crumble. Are you saying you were never attacked on your turn in the realm of khorne when you couldn't move and just entered? Are you saying the AI can't experience it?
Greasus came in, he was attacked by an army with high HP pool and lots of entities in the end turn and he didn't, nor couldn't move, all those enemies died and he got bloodshed, where's the bug? Perhaps you can show one screenshot with the rogue army leader alive. "Sa'ved" and greasus has bloodshed just by entering.
*Welcome to: How to lose 200+ Hours of Gametime in just one Patch!*
even though it says that the saves still work.
So this is another weird one, I had no issues loading and playing my old saves after the patch.
My game had horrible performance with my cooler running wild and CTD already at launch that I stopped after nearly 40 hours… but I never had those horrible glitches ofc
Why playing early access games in the first place
@@klavicus2276 How can you play with no blood for longer than a hour :D Literally WH2 is the same but in better, well I hope the EA period finally ended with their DLC.
I like the fact that legendoftotalwar is in the S tier of historical strategists.
Let's be honest legend is the Alexander the great of the 21st century. He just plays video games instead of conquering the world
I was confused when I saw Erwin Rommel at like B-tier, I don't have a good knowledge of WW2, but he got his ass handed to him at the siege of Tobruk. By some dude who was called Leslie Morsehead.
@@liamclifforth7046 He nearly single handedly captured North Africa and large parts of France
@@Tacom01 To be fair, the British in North Africa(at least early on) were kinda out matched in competency and in tank battles(which were very important). British tanks were just out gunned and out ranged by their German counter parts in which I think at one point after Tobruk a large quantity of tanks were supplied to British forces in order to lead several counter offensives. From memory I remember "Crusader" and "Churchill" were the main tanks supplied. One of which was more of a light tank and the other a heavy tank that was more for infantry support as it didn't really have the firepower against tanks. I think at least one of the counter offensives was called operation "Crusader" or "battle axe" which whatever they were called was for the most part unsuccessful even with Germany withdrawing/forgoing support to the theatre of North Africa and focusing more on invading Russia. No doubt Rommel was a inspiring, energetic, competent general; but I doubt he was something special enough to go into B-tier. I guess it was just his fame and him gaining the nick name "The Desert Fox". I only really know about the siege of Tobruk and some surrounding details on that theatre due to a certain book I read, so I don't know anything about his victories in France. I just know that he wasn't able to crack Tobruk initially against Morsehead who I don't think is a name of recognition like Rommel's, whilst also dedicating his resources to taking that fortress due to its precious port. Whilst Tobruk was very important, he spent too much time and resources trying to grind it down when he should have avoided such a death trap. I would recommend finding a map/picture that details the defences of Tobruk under Morsehead, it definitely had the German tanks in mind ;).
@@liamclifforth7046 Ulysses S. Grant is in B-tier as well, a man who was so inept at strategy and maneuver he was called The Butcher by his own troops. He won by throwing men and materiel at the South until he ground them down, the man was about as far from a "strategist" as one can possibly get. I wouldn't put much stock in that list.
Honestly large units or units with aoe attacks shouldnt need to turn PERFECTLY towards an enemy to hit them.
Units in general need to not be so damn finicky when it comes to taking a swing. They did this in WH2 as well and I was never entirely certain my units were ever actually fighting.
@@ASpaceOstrich ye its just weird. One of the reasons melee was alwas more meh.
Legend had a great doomstack video about that recently with Skarbrand. When he was completely surround by infantry (humans), Skarbrand just didnt seem able to attack anyone despite towering above the mob and having large wings
I just tested it with a terracotta sentinel and a great unclean one (Because they are very slow and show this clearly) and my god.
The terracotta does his charge attack into the center mass and scatters the infantry, then didn't swing for 6 seconds, picking one individual person killed them, then took another 6 seconds to pick another. Every time he chooses a target he has to turn slightly, extending his attack time from 4seconds to around 6-7s which is like, 30-40% less dps.
The great unclean is just as bad. He doesn't scatter infantry on his charge much, so he doesn't actually turn around much since he keeps most enemies in front of him. But he has a large forward arcing melee attack that he CONSTANTLY chooses to throw at the corners of a formation. almost 40-60% of his splash damage seems to be wasted. He rarely ever takes a swing at center mass. It actually hurts his overall dps and therefore, means he takes longer to fight and more damage.
They should just make large single entities attack the cell containing the most entities or something, since that would be the most efficient (and logical) way to wipe out grouped enemies smaller than you. Even a mindless daemon would be smart enough to think "I'd rather kill 5 men than 1 at a time".
Also infantry needs to be far more responsive about moving, trying to pull units back feels like fighting in custard
I love how you and Tarrifff made the same ogre joke. This unintended collaboration is beautiful.
Btw that auto-resolve thing has been going on on their updated games. I noticed that the AI gets ridiculous auto resolve strength in Shogun 2 with a half stack against my full that I later annihilated in less than 2 minutes.
Tarriff assisted me with this video
@@RobertusMaximus answers to my prayers.
After this video, I'm more undestanding of the negative reviews. I might be blessed, except of fps drops, didn't get any such bugs.
Same for me
Bugs were not a huge problem for me either but game is really problematic rn even if there were no bugs
I get fps bugs frequently. But mostly it plays like TWW2
Didn't get any bugs but then again i only played 20 hours before the siege battles and the horrible AI got to me
I haven't had much of any bugs. Few crashes here and there sure but not really that much.
I had been playing a Greasus campaign for 200 ish turns and went to get the last demon soul in Nurgle's realm. I autoresolved the demon prince battle and won. Then, my army was teleported back to the mortal realms, and I still didn't have the soul. I went back in there again and won against the gardener again and I still did not get the soul
I feel awful for the people playing on Legendary difficulty. People need to be ready to save scum in order to protect their campaigns from game-breaking bugs
Warhammer 3 looks like a great game... five months from now. Until then, I will keep it in my library, waiting for more patches.
sad that you bought it in the first place, with that they don't need to patch anything, since they already got your money
@@zocker1600 I mean I did have a decent canpaign with cathay and the prologue was fun, but after that I didn't feel like starting another campaign
5 months? I expect it will be playable in at least 1 year. CA is not fast in making their games playable
@@zocker1600 But they want to sell us DLC and new factions, that is were most of their money and model come form. Which is actually good because it pressures them to make a GOOD game.
They can't one pump and run on us if they want to cash in like Warhammer 2 did.
@@iforgotmyname1669 you're right but it still sucks that they are pushed to release unfinished and unpolished products cuz they gotta hit those Q1 performance metrics. Fuck the modern vidya game industry man :(
I had such high hopes for it's performance because troy seemed to run soo smoothly
exactly! Same engine and graphics
@@RobertusMaximus how ? I play both Warhemmer 2 and 3 but in 3 in the battle loading screen 📺 it crashes different from Warhemmer 2 how ? How CA?
Well my coolers did run wild even in Troy (which doesn’t happen when I play other games like shooters for some reason you might know, but I don’t) but I never had CTD in Troy (didn’t play latest patch so no glitches in warhammer but never had those in Troy anyway)
the battles literally are broken and not enough people are discussing it. im glad you did by showing how collision doesn't exist for many units.
the blob battles are getting worse ...
It's not that collision doesn't exist, it's the new mass feature not being fully balanced properly yet. Infantry units will not walk through an infantry unit (which they would with no collision), but anything with mass can basically just barrel through. Tweak those numbers and that issue is fixed.
Worse than the collision is the atrocious pathfinding, the way units move when they find a path and how they can barely attack when they reach their goal. Also Sieges have become even more annoying than in warhammer 2 with infinite range towers everywhere and always forcing blobs with little strategy. And now not even tier 1 settlements without walls are safe from it. Field battles always were the most interesting and they barely exist anymore.
Weirdly enough, it seems that allied units block each other ten times more than the enemy.
Which is fucking frustrating.
The worst this is that there are no sync animations. In a warhammer game.
Hope blood pack will fix it.... Maybe
Sync animations just slowed down the battles, they weren't that great.
Shogun 2 has pretty good sync animations and its battles are very fast
@@fatrat92 this is astronomically wrong
@@fatrat92 ever played shogun 2?
Auto resolve: Valiant Defeat
Manual: Close victory
Eh, this was a problem in TWW2, too.
2 Skaven lords with no troops, one of which is at half health: Hoh? Are you approaching me? The Autoresolve says close defeat, and yet you are approaching me?
Full stack Lizardmen army with small garrison: I can't beat the shit out of you for a decisive victory without getting closer.
Yeah, autoresolve's always sucked.
The funny thing is that before Warhammer 3’s release I hadn’t played a total war game before only watched the various content creators in the community. So it would appear that I chose the perfect time to get into the series…
By purchasing Warhammer 2 (and 1 for mortal empires but YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN)
Warhammer 2's launch was pretty bad also, but that game is amazing now. I would recommend just playing Warhammer 2 for a few weeks until Warhammer 3 is patched if it's giving you problems.
buy shogun 2 instead friend
Even just buy RTW1 & Med2TW and play all of those mods...
I hope they do an overhaul to the main campaign mechanics, the rifts feel like such a chore and the fact you have to rush to gather the 4 souls sucks, the AI seemingly gets the souls in like 2 turns after the rifts open so you have to rush it all.
It's crazy how many bad design choices went into making Warhammer 3. Did no senior employee see the Realms of Chaos and think "a lot of people might hate this." I'm still in awe that so many people enjoy the siege battles
@@RobertusMaximus I would love to see a behind the scenes during the development. The idea of the rifts and going to the chaos realm is cool, but it feels like it was a last minute addition almost. There’s so much they could do with it, so either they will or I’m sure modders will in the future.
@@RobertusMaximus The Realms of Chaos isn't as bad as people make it out to be, it's an objective based campaign and people are piss that they have to play to the objective. They could spawn fewer rifts, but other than that i don't think it's as bad a people are making it out to be. Also the siege battles are a lot better than the shitty field battles we got instead of minor settlement battles. The siege battles are one of the best parts of the game.
Hear me out on the siege battles ... why are these minor settlements designed to let enemies waltz in from every possible direction? Some maps have four entrances and others have eight. It makes zero sense from a defensive standpoint and kills the immersion for me. The supply system makes me never want to play another survival or siege battle. Respawning overpowered towers & glitchy barricades. Why would they have every barricade and tower connected to a supply point instantly explode when the attacker captures the point? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills trying to engage with these siege battles.
patiently waiting for mod support so I can disable rifts, cause it's gonna be the first mod to go up 100%
Okay I’ve never run into any of these issues but holy crap this looks like the launch total war Rome 2
Rome 2 was quite worse.
Unplayable basically.
While here a bug is something like units not responding for 3 seconds or a manticore glitching out mid dive due to air/land toggle issues.
On rome 2 a whole unit may die because they dismounted a ship by shooting themselves off it.
Really puts into perspective about how modern rome 2 shows that if you threaten a company with boycott enough they will turn coal into diamonds
Rome 2's launch was WAY worse. At least with WH3 you can actually play it.
Not even remotely true. People just act dramatic. Rome 2 was something above and beyond.
Because WH3, at the very least, is playable.
So it begin...
Loved the comparison between Prince so-so and Arthas.
It's amazing that CA fucked up what could possibly be the most important game they ever released.
Love how that describes my own total war Warhammer 3 journey so well...
Me watching to see how horrible the launch is
Also me: Headbanging and not even paying attention
every unit dieng or atleast bugging out on those terrace fields of nan gao: "welcome to the rice fields MFs"
I swear I can barely make out the models of my units, especially in snow regions. I have also found I despise the siege towers to high hell. Their insane range and no collision makes me fairly angry every time I realize that the reason one of my units is losing men is because 2 towers on the opposite side of the map are up and have me in their sights with magical telescopes.
Also sometimes magic jets off in a random direction? I thought it was my mistake at first that heavily damaged my own units with the Tempest biting wind, but I've had multiple times where it just launches in a different direction. I think it has something to do with nearby impassable terrain, but I still need to experiment.
Yeah magic bouncing off of impassable terrain was in WH2.
I re-watched all your WH experience videos today😅 can't wait for the next one
I'm not sure I'll be doing that series for Warhammer 3. I would need Creative Assembly to fix the core issues of the game which might not be possible on the Warscape engine.
@@RobertusMaximus I'd he glad to see these ones and I'm sure that CA will patch as much as possible to make more money out of the game
Thank you for using my Skarbrand, it's always a joy to see it out in the wild.
Also yeah this game started out fucking rough. And still is rough.
Probably the best video I have ever seen. Top tier content man
3:06
Random peasant: For the Emperor!
Miao Ying: ...Is gay!
You didn't buy Total War Warhammer 3 because it's buggy and unfinished and the current campaign is broken and not in a fun way.
I didn't buy Total War Warhammer 3 because my computer would probably blow up.
We are not the same.
that was the day when every warhammer player took a vacation to the lands between, to become elden lord, while waiting for immortal empires
Seeing this games release makes me laugh every time someone told me medieval 2's AI was bad compared to modern titles.
As far as I know, the AI has always been bad
@@lorenzocassaro3054 Makes it all the more laughable when people tell me it's what makes newer games better.
Yep, people kept saying "the sieges are shit because the AI couldn't handle the old ones!" And all I can think is "yeah well the new sieges are shit AND the AI can't handle them"
If CA imported the minor settlements from Troy and the major settlements from either Three Kingdoms, Thrones or Shogun 2, I'd probably give it another chance
Been playing third age total war dac ago since a few days now ive been having a blast. Medieval 2 mod. Having more fun than tww3 thats for sure. Atleast medieval 2's engine felt like things have mass and impact. While holding formations and lines. Shame the zoom zoom gameplay of today's market ruined these titles so badly. When playing tatw in retrospect i can cearly see why these issue's matter. Siege battle slug fests overall just feel better even with crappy ai.
So... it's a regular messy total war launch?
@Fourthspartan56 i mean, i heard that was mainly due to some salty people review bombing it for no valid reason, besides the bad frames on the campaign map
I hear battles have no frame issue somehow
@Fourthspartan56 that just comes from the expectations after WH2... For a CA launch WH3 was fine. Did not expect the game to be playable to be honest. And for me it was. Will, like always, take a few large patches until it becomes okay, and a few years until its great.
@@thebaron9405 The review bomb doesn't mean anything now, because the game is just bad, and CA is hiding beneath the sand
@@thebaron9405 Chinese review bombed it, because CA had a stroke of genious and gave it to random large streamers to try out before launch. Many who never played a Total War game. And many Total War streamers got nothing... Community went crazy. Understandable in my opinion.
I heard rome 2 was...way worse, but hey also it appeared that some people had problems, others had the game working fine, and like we know, no total war launch is perfect and us a community should find every bit of jank and report it to CA
I had no idea how lucky I am, vecause the only of these issues I've seen is the chasm cam.
This is some legendary meme art right here.
Feels like i am watching total war rome 2 all over again.
funnily enough I personally didn´t experience that many bugs, apart from the odd crash here and there it runs smoothly most of the time
Considering every single unit is bugged you experienced it
Dude same, even the pathfinding issues haven't been an issue for me really with the odd exception, but nothing as bad as this video.
You poor souls who bought this 😅 enjoyed the video! Looking forward to the others lined up!
My hard drive's remaining storage is half the size of that update
I have to give the devs credit that they focussed on developping things modders cant change like faction and campaign mechanics, but i still dont know why stuff like climate is in the game, the number of people who complain about not getting any replenishment on their units due to climate is off the charts
not to mention force march still being able to be performed when a unit has some movement left, enabling the AI to run past your armies while still attacking, turning the game in an army goosechase
It's a definitive feature that reinforcing forced marched armies will die if they don't make it to the battlefield in time, right?
@@RobertusMaximus Dammit, I hope you're jocking, because this doesn't make sense.
I like the idea of winning battles before the enemy reinforcements arrive, but to lose an army because of what you said sounds really awful...even for the AI!
Remember in WH1 when you couldn't occupy/colonize because of climate?
@@lorenzocassaro3054 even worse I think Legendoftotalwar said if the AI get wiped before reinforcements, the reinforcement army still survives. But the same rule doesn't apply to the player.
Here's a tip.
If you order an army to attack an enemy, but you know they'll retreat, and you can't catch them, hit the backspace button right as your army enters their command circle. This effectively "locks" both armies in place. If the AI doesn't just attack you, you'll have your full movement to chase down their retreat on the next turn. The AI obeys this command circle blocking, instead of just ignoring it like it does if trapped by mountains and such, thankfully.
It's amazing how much it tanks everyone's GPU with dogshit FPS yet Troy looks better AND runs better.
But don't you dare say that in the total war subreddit
Looks better? Not a chance. Definitely runs better tho.
@@LordVader1094 Yes it does look better the lighting and SSAO in WH3 is currently bugged on plenty of maps. This was pointed out by plenty of RUclipsrs before release.
@@LordVader1094 It 100% does look better on my system
I can run troy at near max settings in 4K
WH3 I have to drop every setting as low as I can except texture detail and drop my res to 1440p
Tell me, which of the games would look better in that situation?
2:01 I fucking lost it at the tier list! This is some great stuff.
I'm waiting for some armchair historians to debate me in the comment section
1:44
Yeah the auto resolve cheats are infuriating
Like I get it for early game but when you reach the point where you just want to paint the map and you're pretty much done this sh*t is gonna make you take so mich more time for no reason (especially with as big immortal empires will be), the cheats should be scaling down as turns go on imo, so playing battles early game is rewarding as it should but is not as needed in the later stages of the campaign
I pray that CA can turn this around, that eventually after enough updates and patches, that this game can truly be as great as all of us hoped it would be. Or at the very least not a downgrade from warhammmer 2.
The best that Warhammer 3 will ever be is probably an expanded Mortal Empires from Warhammer 2. The core issues will not be solved unless done by a mod team. I had my fun with Warhammer 2. If Creative Assembly can't improve the core issues affecting the real-time battles, I'll just move on to other games and save my wallet
@@RobertusMaximus that seems a little extreme, especially since the entire community isn't even experiencing the same issues, I haven't seen 90% of the pathfinding issues you displayed in the video and the charge mass system needs one patch to make it not ruin formations. Apart from that a few optimization patches should clear up the other issues that I agree should not have been present. I'm also annoyed by the patching system but I'm given to understand that's actually a steam issue not a CA issue. All in all there are many improvements to this game over two and 90% of my issues can easily be fixed by mods so im not worried about it.
@@RobertusMaximus I'll do the same. CA shat the bed with this one and the market is extremely competitive these days. Why should we ever believe in anything they do when they cannot even learn from their own TWW2 and they don't listen to advice? TWW3 was supposed to be so easy. TWW2 with some new additional mechanics, a new map, and an interesting campaign. Instead we got a buggy extended mod with no re-playability.
@@RobertusMaximus it's gotten much better
Daemon prince, a powerful demi god of the ruinous powers! a mortal given inhumen strength and might! Somehow weaker than HIS MORTAL SELF.
But he flies now :p
I like that you have Legendofotalwar as a S tier commander, with yourself as God of course.xD
My Daemon Prince "Avatar of Malice" is greatly enjoying his campaign. I just enjoy the ensuing madness.
Don't forget the whole... AI lords will respawn will a full stack instantly after you kill them.
Enemy LL wound times are ridiculous, but they don't really spawn with army. They replace lord of existing stack
@@Dragonus91 I dunno... that would still mean you have multiple AI lords sitting there recruiting full stacks constantly.
Making the AI have unlimited money.
Well that's what they are doing :D
AI can often afford 2 armies just by owning single minor settlement, so imagine how many armies major faction can have by mid / late game
@@Dragonus91 I do know XD
Just dealing with Kostaltyn having 5 armies running around whilst only having a few minor settlements... then instantly coming back with a full stack of tsar guard and streltsi.
I thought Atillas optimization was worst in the whole series, until I played this mess
i wish you would have included the famous "The game is broken ea sports" meme but made a Creative Assembly version of it. But 10/10 video anyways really puts to show why you should always wait for the initial launch the settle in, instead of pre-ordering
God i love warhammer videos like this, its a shame there arent a ton like them
Love the video, the music is great and it's unfortunately spot on :)
Thank you.
Someone had to record that shitshow for posterity.
I spent over 3 grand on a gaming rig in anticipation for this game and I still don't think it will be enough
The only problem i had was when it chrashed during the cutcsene
The video lags because of my bad wifi and honestly, it makes it even better.
I'm always impressed how societies that pump AAA titles keep introducing bugs in features that have been present for several titles with the same level of class they would have if it was the first time.
With all the design choices, and all that, it's as if they fired all senior staff and brought in new people that had never played a Total War before, "Here's the recipe, make a new cake with it."
I'm glad I'm not the only person who's been finding the game to be pretty much unplayable.
Oh yeah Arthas was a much better effin villain. CA could have pretty much copy-pasted his story but instead Prince boy takes up the sword of evil, goes mad with determination and kills his brother because he heard a deep voice that one time.
Holy shit I felt like I was going crazy reading the reviews and seeing so many positive ones, glad other people want to see changes.
The best video of warhammer 3 so far XD
Legend should have his own tier called cheese
An issue you didnt mention is high mass units just obliterating formations (like the clip of the plaguebearers
I’d forgive all of this if they let me autoresolve the fuckin final battle
I had no interest in getting that far. Why is the final battle so awful?
@@RobertusMaximus it’s actually pretty good the problem is it’s like 30 minutes long and it’s mandatory to fight it manually every single time
@Airitech I completely agree, I got far enough to access the final battle with Kairos and I can't do anything to succeed in it. I find it baffling that I have to manually do the battle when all the other shit survival battles could be auto'd. On one hand I get it that it's the grandiose final battle but I don't want to endure half an hour every single time I wanna take a crack at the battle just to say I won and for my reward to be Belakor on a leash.
@@smithysmithers399 honestly I just put the battle difficulty to easy because I don’t want to deal with it, it’s not hard it’s just so long
I personally really love trying to defend great bastion maps and losing when 1 kurgan stands on the leadership point despite my whole army sitting on the main victory point.
Its weird bc even after 100 hours I didnt meet any Bug or bad Performance except 2 Crashes. It runs smooth and everything works
Same
My PC is pretty outdated so I dont get to complain about performance but the biggest one I have is the unit responsiveness. Its like there's a 10 second delay between giving a command then unit starting to move. Also Tzeentch realm should be reworked entirely and I still dont get how the rifts work after you finish the campaign. Like they keep popping up and I get messages that another faction got four souls and I have to stop them but A. Thats bullshit cause I have Belakor and B. When I enter a rift I cant go to the forge of souls. What should happen is that no more rifts open up and you just get to sandbox but right now I dont even understand what does happen.
Isn't it incredible how thousands of players are suggesting better alternatives and mechanics for the campaign?
@@RobertusMaximus So many easy fixes like just remove the chaos realm debuff make them give rewards. Other stuff is just unfishied like finishing the campain should give a bigger and customized reward. Like Skarbrand gets redeemed and gets his wings back, Tzeentch can see everything and gets a stop time spell or something, Kugath gets a superplague, Ogres get like a limited resource of godmeat that gives them superbuffs when they eat it, summer comes for Kislev, giving a bunch of growth and untainted everywhere,... Would all help replayability or give you a reason to continue playing after finishing the story.
I mean...why should they keep opening up, if by then Ursun's already been freed (or eaten) in the first place? Weren't they supposed to be opened by his roars?
@@MrTwiggy73 Or...better yet: HAVE THE FACTIONS HAVE THEIR OWN OBJECTIVES, OTHER THAN GETTING TO THAT FREAKING BEAR?!
@@lorenzocassaro3054 Yeah for some factions the bear objective is a bit of a stretch. Also I had another idea, cause I do like the teleport option through rifts. Why dont they give Belakor a trait (cause he doesnt even have one right now) that controls the rifts? Like no rifts open up in friendly territory but Belakor can open them at will. My longest campain is with Skarbrand and its superfun to just teleport max lvl Skarbrand with a doomstack into the heart of Kislev or Cathay and just raze everything. If Mortal Empires is gonna be as big as they say, some teleport mechanic would be handy there too.
OH yes, I also had that. I personally had to restart legendary Kislev like 3 times before I was able to win the rift campaign (then lost the domination one 'cause Tzeentch had 44 settlements somewhere and sent 10 or so full stacks constantly, who teleport around and ambush attack my armies in encampment stance)
I sent Katarin to stop one AI from entering the forge. I finish the battle and go out. Then like 4 turns later another AI collects the souls so I enter the portal and defeat them. The first AI enters immediately after.
THen I lost anyway because you need your faction leader in two places at once.
Then the campaign where I won the short campaign I've got a bug where I enter the realm of Slaneesh. I see the demon prince come just after me, so I decide to set up ambush at the portal exit. He teleports down....and now neither of us can move or attack. 2 turns later Kugath enters the portal, teleports down and zoom past us. My army was stuck there for 10 turns until Ku'gath reached the damn soul.
Thank god I didn’t spend more time on my campaigns
2:00 You have to find Legend Of Total War in 15 sec after clicking this
GO NOW
sometimes if my pc has been on too long the game just crashes as i load it so i have to restart my pc everytime i want to play it, and by too long i mean like 3 hours
instant subscribe. hilarious work.
2:02 look man...I'm hit or miss
Remember when I asked you "Warhammer 3 can't be that bad right?!" HAHAHA
@@RobertusMaximus look man,...I guess I'm really biased towards WH, it's definitely bad right now. A lot of those bugs you pointed out I never encountered or I just never realized them
Legendoftotalwar as an A tier general fucking killed me hahahahahaha. Thank you.
It’s S tier at the end
I will be honest, i haven't seen all of this problem, maybe i'm just lucky
Actually youre not the only one, it kind of seens that we have different versions of the game, I finish a khorne campaing completly fine
The power of chaos has possesed the game we are all doomed!
One brave step forward up the stairs. One ducking flight of stairs back down.
CA development.
I would be happy if they fix the annoying camera which can not stay on the same hight and units actually following orders instead of forgetting them whenever they encounter any enemy nearby.
What did you expect from hell?
Wow now I am really glad that I decided to wait for the mortal empires release.
I haven't had any issues with crashes, or major bugs. The only thing that annoyed me in how lords are worse at getting into combat against larger units and tend to just get cycle charged to death in less than 60 seconds even with guard mode turned off.
CA promised us to complete "Trilogy" with "hang" but even I didn't expect it to be so negative one. Settlement battle are harder than capitols thx to unlimited towers workshop AI is presenting us, poor graphics customizations and bugs like not able to click buttons if resolution of the game is not the same as your desktop resolution, units standing even if you command them to attack, mindless Chaos Realm design aka Nurgle rebuff Kugath when that guy is in his Realm and so on. Warhammer 1 has similar issue but they weren't so dramatic as here.
The Warhammer 3 game design choices (Realms of Chaos campaign + Siege Rework) are bewildering. What's even more bewildering is that Creative Assembly allowed its anticipated CASH-COW product to launch in this state.
Even after Scammerpunk 2077, Bugfield 2042 people still keep pre ordering stuff. Even when have tasted it once in form of Rome 2.
I can't even launch a game, stuck on credits screen
Pro tip:
You can disable the spawn of chaos agents and armies from the rifts AS WELL as make it impossible for the AI to collect souls (they will still be able to enter the realms, just won't be able to win the boss battles)
Or alternatively disable the rifts completely.
Just search how to do it and look got a reddit guide, it takes 5 mimutes at most.
Rome 2 Two: Warhammer Boogaloo
I love watching the salt flow.
Bloody hell! So these are the problems people have been experiencing. I have too good computer.
Tzeentch pranked us yet again!
These problems seem to be only happening to players on a 50/50 ratio cause half of the players who got this aren't encountering these bugs, meanwhile the others are currently dropped into nurgles porcelain throne.
until this gets fixed...
warhammer 2 im sorry for leaving you
Ah Creative Assembly, one of the many AAA developer that releases "early access" games while calling it a full price product.
They are on Ubisoft's level of fuckery when it comes to this.
I wish the game best of luck in the future and hopefully at the time when immortal empires comes out everything will be fine. But considering the state mortal empires turned out at first, I have my doubts.
4x games and cRPGs really do have a tendency to be an absolute nightmare on launch, too bad those are my favorite genres :/
Hey, at least Ubisoft never sold Gore setting in order to circumvent the ratings.
...yet
Struggling to hit 60fps in this game where I easily could get 120+ in wh2 with some tweaking
specs: 3080, 10900, 32GB ram, 1tb nvme
Similar pc i got and both games works like shit for me. 120 FPS in wh2? In menu maybe xD
@@SuiSideex Its possible if you're willing to lower some settings (in battle at least, campaign map is fcked)
4:22 that's my boi :')
Funnily enough, games been running great for me
I’ll just get game when it actually comes out in 2024.
Chaos definitely came alright
That optimization looks absolutely absurd, even compared to Attila.
ngl I can see now why ppl complained 😂 my game had no lag, no graphic bugs and runs at constant 60 fps around. Well let's pray for those that got issues that the next patch will fix most of it
4 months later and we are still in the open beta that costed $60
It would be a awesome joke, if I did not have spend over 50 bucks on it.
I had 0 bug in like 80 hour , only 1 graphics bug in a map now that I think , Im one of the lucky