No nobody did anything to him. He simply had dedication and PRACTICED because he wanted to. Unfortunately though the majority of people nowadays are far from his level and are much below average and rather listen to 'songs' like Bad Guy or some random Justin Bieber shit. Therefore nobody really practices as much as before, nowadays it's just some 4 chord 'song' performed repetitively all the time and people enjoy it.
Nikita Gladko Wow, didn’t know that, I knew La Campanella was Paganini’s piece, but I assumed that was the end of that. It actually makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the info.
I probably screwed up my audition yesterday cuz i forgot to play the 2nd G in a 2 octave scale. My friend did worse with her 3 octave g major scale cuz she started to play minor in the second octave then went back to major then went back to minor then major lol
.........did someone actually play this for the recording? And if they did, I can only say......I'm speechless. Well done. I applaud you to the high heavens. You deserve a special place in God's great heavenly orchestra. AND WHO THE HECK GAVE A DISLIKE?!
This is not a difficult piece to play nor to memorize, with good form and moderately slow tempo. A beginner violinist should be able to play this with minimal time. I contrast learning to do swing notes where finger, bow, and rythm change entirely is madingly difficult.
For all of those who believe that this is beyond them, well, believe it or not, it really is quite playable! The fingerings for the scales and the chromatically simply need to be practiced slowly, and when it comes to the agitato sixteenth, the fingerings there too are also quite violinistic. I just wouldn’t recommend using the directed bowings. Don’t bother with the connected spiccato. Just go up down the entire way and it will make it much easier. Remember, nothing is difficult so long as you practice it slowly.
"just go up down the entire way"... that's disappointing. The original bowing by Paganini is 50% of this piece's essence. It is fine to learn it without the bowing for sake of playing the notes but it is not the original intent of the piece.
@@slurpeerogue003 Well, if you like to think that way, that’s fine, but most professionals disagree. The original bowing is fun, but it’s too clunky and the sound isn’t as rich as with the standard bowing of today. There’s just no point🤷🏻♂️
@@Tennisisreallyfun I don't know what "professionals" you think would disagree. Paganini's music were pieces written to showcase the skillfulness of the player. The "original bowing" was written for a reason, otherwise it wouldn't have been there in the manuscript for the intended sounds (clunky? maybe it's played incorrectly). It's that final 10% of mastering a piece that takes years of "study" and re-learning and THEN you can perform with your own take. Never start learning a piece with the intention of playing it like a Suzuki exercise / getting the notes and move on.
@@slurpeerogue003 Alright, fine, “disagree” is one thing, I’m sure everyone “agrees” that it’s worthy to study a piece with the original bowings, but few professionals play it. Perlman, Milstein, Kavakos, Mintz, etc… I just looked it up now and found an early Michael Rabin video with him forsaking the original bowings and doing a lovely job in the process. That “reason” why it was written? Obviously it was to show off for Paganini, but it’s unnecessary, and impossible to play at, say, the speed of a young Kavakos which can be found here on RUclips. And while I thank you for instructing me on how to study properly instead of like a Suzuki piece, my current teacher studied with Hirschorn and he too said that the original bowings are unnecessary for this piece. As for me, I tried it and didn’t like it (go ahead, call me a name). For some pieces, like Elgar’s “La Cappricceuse” or “Hora Staccato”, the up bow and down bow connections are an essential element, but it has been a long time since the violin community agreed that this piece, this particular caprice can be played both ways without the world ending.
Violinist: If we are supposed to use our 4th finger at 0:06 what do we use at 0:5? Pianist: your fifth duh. Violinist: He needs help Paganini: If you think he needs help you need help btw you use your 4th again it’s called shifting. Violinist:what’s shifting Paganini: you where wrong again YOU need help more than I do. Ling Ling: This is sad
I'm not a violinist or a pianist (well if you count making piano music on MuseScore than yes) but when I was looking for the sheet music on IMSLP for this, I saw the words "Holograph Manuscript", when I clicked on it and looked at it, you can't even read it that well, it will make you confused, you can't hardly understand where the notes are that well. I was like Paganini, Why?! and then I looked for a different type of sheet music for that piece.
I don't even play violin, I'm a pianist, and even thinking to play this on piano at such a speed is like my worst nightmare. And that's coming from someone who's been playing piano for more than 10 years.
Hyper-Technicality and extreme Complexity does not necessarily translates to beauty . The main mission of art , is CREATING BEAUTY . Many exquisitely beautiful pieces are surprisingly simple .
Sumina Studer- I can play this with the original bowings. Augustin Hadelich- I can do the same- but better. Kavakos- Amateurs. Augustin- What was that punk? Kavakos- Amateurs. (Kavakos can play Pag 5 insanely fast)
Confirmed! Paganini had a pact with the devil. This piece is an undeniable proof. . . . . . . . . . . . . Nah, just kidding. He only enjoyed trolling people
but could Ling Ling write/create something as amazing as this? imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but i can’t imagine another human being today not only being able to play this, but compose the pieces that paganini did during his time when people never played like this. that’s the true genius.
You call this easy Paganini pieces ? What is easy in this mad circus of notes in mastery arrangement by the greatest of all violinists ...Shri Pagananini Saheb Guru Pandit ...We all salute this great violinist who put all other composers and violinists in embarrassment....and confusion till few learned his techniques like Alexander Markov , of course Leonid Kogan the best.
Twoset references Paganini a lot and people probably just wanted to check out more Paganini pieces. They probably have referenced this caprice though; it's one of the more famous ones
Recently I started to play some paganini caprices, and I Just realized, in a way play paganini still is kind of impossible even for violin virtuosos, most of violinist even virtuosos in a way "cheat" in some caprices, for example this no. 5 most violinists dont play the original bow, and this caprices was composed as a way of etude Just for practice that bow, and no one except few violinists plays with original bow, another example caprice 24, no one plays exactly how paganini wrote some variations espcially the chords variation, no 16 a lot of violinists dont play that presto tempo with the original fingerings that paganini wrote, and so many examples of all paganini caprices, the only person I have seen he played exactly how paganini wrote is Salvatore Accardo, the rest of most violinists always change something like fingerings, bowings, tempo, change some instead of Sul G they play on the d string, etc. Is interesting tilo this days is still almost imposible play paganini trustworthy.
![Ranking PAGANINI 24 Caprices 🎻 [Difficulty Tier List]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bYGRF_S9ZkM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Six Hundred Strike [EPIC: The Musical] Full Animatic](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zov6NXIAuow/mqdefault.jpg)
Paganini is a demon, he completely murdered my self esteem.
Really
Benjamin Torres no such thing as the devil, the guy was just a freak of nature
Emma Yuan
Yeah I’m boutta do the same but on Piano
You know he composed this when he was 13
Haha true af
What did violins do to hurt him to this point
His father wouldn't let him eat unless he practiced :(
Zederath :(
@@CR33SIVE yep quite sad
No nobody did anything to him. He simply had dedication and PRACTICED because he wanted to. Unfortunately though the majority of people nowadays are far from his level and are much below average and rather listen to 'songs' like Bad Guy or some random Justin Bieber shit. Therefore nobody really practices as much as before, nowadays it's just some 4 chord 'song' performed repetitively all the time and people enjoy it.
What does Justin Bieber have to do with Paganini lmao
Is this a good song for beginners?
I just graduated high school, when can I start neurosurgery?
Yes this is one of the most common songs for 3 year olds that want to start violin
Even a mouse running in violin could play it
Mr Bencroft I think we all know we where joking too
If you play it at 25%,sure.
@@TheExarion ok boomer
Paganini on the Violin = Liszt on the Piano.
Emperor Gaming
Liszt was influenced by Paganini and obsessed by his pieces on the Violin
Nikita Gladko Wow, didn’t know that, I knew La Campanella was Paganini’s piece, but I assumed that was the end of that. It actually makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the info.
Emperor Gaming
I mean he’s right
There should be a Liszt of people like Liszt
@@lopkobor6916 you mean a liszt of people that eats paganini paninis
i can't even play a g major scale properly
Habrid O'Young hope you can now
I probably screwed up my audition yesterday cuz i forgot to play the 2nd G in a 2 octave scale. My friend did worse with her 3 octave g major scale cuz she started to play minor in the second octave then went back to major then went back to minor then major lol
@@okboomer6724 It's not that hard because it doesn't need shifting.
@@okboomer6724 i hate doing the three octave g major scale because i always forget
wow you suck
Alternative title: how to slice open every finger on the e string
Lol love it
this is even scarier than caprice 24.
"If Mozart took Red Bull" should be the correct title for this video
Hugo Morales *If Beethoven played the violin and had redbull
*crack cocaine
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If Franz Liszt had taken Red Bull
TV Damage He took even harder stuff, when it wasn't forbidden yet
This is the Heavy Metal of XVIII century ❤
No lie this is making me more then a bit confused but has my two year old dancing.
Any normie: Counting to 4 is easy
Musicians before Paganini: Common time is one of the easiest time signatures
Paganini: Hold my Tea
Dude don't exaggerate
Italians drink coffe and he never would make it hold to someone, he plays while drinking espresso
Lmfao, I can only listen to his music, If I even look or even attempt my eyes will turn red and my hands will break off lmfao.
It’s one thing to hear it performed and another to watch the notes fly by and just try to stay on the beat on the sheet music - amazing 😳
I do that, too!
“ Classical heavy metal “
.........did someone actually play this for the recording? And if they did, I can only say......I'm speechless. Well done. I applaud you to the high heavens. You deserve a special place in God's great heavenly orchestra. AND WHO THE HECK GAVE A DISLIKE?!
You should watch Sumina Studer play this piece. It is amazing!😊
This is not a difficult piece to play nor to memorize, with good form and moderately slow tempo. A beginner violinist should be able to play this with minimal time. I contrast learning to do swing notes where finger, bow, and rythm change entirely is madingly difficult.
langhamp8912 you should delete your comment
It´s Salvatore Accardo, italian violinist and arguably one of the greatest , if not the greatest, perfomer of Paganini´s "Capricci"
@@langhamp8912 bro if this is easy then what am i 😢
yeah this looks playable
Just practice🌟
Sunnycake video 40 hours everyday
For all of those who believe that this is beyond them, well, believe it or not, it really is quite playable! The fingerings for the scales and the chromatically simply need to be practiced slowly, and when it comes to the agitato sixteenth, the fingerings there too are also quite violinistic. I just wouldn’t recommend using the directed bowings. Don’t bother with the connected spiccato. Just go up down the entire way and it will make it much easier. Remember, nothing is difficult so long as you practice it slowly.
"just go up down the entire way"... that's disappointing. The original bowing by Paganini is 50% of this piece's essence. It is fine to learn it without the bowing for sake of playing the notes but it is not the original intent of the piece.
@@slurpeerogue003 Well, if you like to think that way, that’s fine, but most professionals disagree. The original bowing is fun, but it’s too clunky and the sound isn’t as rich as with the standard bowing of today. There’s just no point🤷🏻♂️
@@Tennisisreallyfun I don't know what "professionals" you think would disagree. Paganini's music were pieces written to showcase the skillfulness of the player. The "original bowing" was written for a reason, otherwise it wouldn't have been there in the manuscript for the intended sounds (clunky? maybe it's played incorrectly). It's that final 10% of mastering a piece that takes years of "study" and re-learning and THEN you can perform with your own take. Never start learning a piece with the intention of playing it like a Suzuki exercise / getting the notes and move on.
@@slurpeerogue003 Alright, fine, “disagree” is one thing, I’m sure everyone “agrees” that it’s worthy to study a piece with the original bowings, but few professionals play it. Perlman, Milstein, Kavakos, Mintz, etc… I just looked it up now and found an early Michael Rabin video with him forsaking the original bowings and doing a lovely job in the process. That “reason” why it was written? Obviously it was to show off for Paganini, but it’s unnecessary, and impossible to play at, say, the speed of a young Kavakos which can be found here on RUclips. And while I thank you for instructing me on how to study properly instead of like a Suzuki piece, my current teacher studied with Hirschorn and he too said that the original bowings are unnecessary for this piece. As for me, I tried it and didn’t like it (go ahead, call me a name). For some pieces, like Elgar’s “La Cappricceuse” or “Hora Staccato”, the up bow and down bow connections are an essential element, but it has been a long time since the violin community agreed that this piece, this particular caprice can be played both ways without the world ending.
2:00 I didn't even know that this note existed and could be played on violin😖
Me too.
Well you know what they say, if you can play it slowly
You can play it quickly🤩🎻🎻🎻
It should be the other way around with this piece
Ayyy twoset gang
@@anaverageperson9517dead meme and unfunny commentary gang… eshay!
Steve Vai was inspired by this for Crossroads.
Jason Becker kill'em all.
honestly i hate steve’s version on this
Thank you, Maestro Accardo, for making Paganini live again!
*and it was said (unconfirmed) but paganini was able to play this on one string*
then how could he played the chord, sorry bad grammer
*W H A T*
ケイス
No its not this piece its the Moses Fantasy and a few others that were done SULLA QUARTA
That's impossible. You can't reach the high A on any string except the E string, and you can't play the low A on any string except the G string.
Alternative title: HAVE YOU PRACTICED YOUR SCALES FOR 40 HOURS A DAY LAH?!?!?!
The score is a kind of work of art.
Anyone else unable to keep up with it visually so they just stare at the last note of each score?-
Fantástico, magnífico!
Violinist: If we are supposed to use our 4th finger at 0:06 what do we use at 0:5?
Pianist: your fifth duh.
Violinist: He needs help
Paganini: If you think he needs help you need help btw you use your 4th again it’s called shifting.
Violinist:what’s shifting
Paganini: you where wrong again YOU need help more than I do.
Ling Ling: This is sad
Salvatore Accardo.... una garanzia!!
So this dude deadass woke up one day and said "hmm. I think I'll just destroy every virtuoso's dream of ever being the best at anything".
Starts playing.
Dies
My self esteem left the chat
I'm not a violinist or a pianist (well if you count making piano music on MuseScore than yes) but when I was looking for the sheet music on IMSLP for this, I saw the words "Holograph Manuscript", when I clicked on it and looked at it, you can't even read it that well, it will make you confused, you can't hardly understand where the notes are that well. I was like Paganini, Why?! and then I looked for a different type of sheet music for that piece.
I don't even play violin, I'm a pianist, and even thinking to play this on piano at such a speed is like my worst nightmare. And that's coming from someone who's been playing piano for more than 10 years.
Schumann has a piano version of this caprice
The first SHREDDER
teaching myself how to read sheet music. that first ascending part is pretty challenging on guitar.
me encanta.adoro a paganinni.
Hyper-Technicality and extreme Complexity does not necessarily translates to beauty . The main mission of art , is CREATING BEAUTY . Many exquisitely beautiful pieces are surprisingly simple .
Thanks for uploading!
No problem! I appreciate your gratitude :)
Came from 2 set violin
Anna Walker in which video do they play it?
lol me too. I thought well they did it not to difficultly soooooooo....
2 &17 seconds later. Me=Xp
Niccolo Paganini late reaction but the video is called how to paganini
Maua
Too bad twoset doesn’t play Piano, that’s a disappointment, I was hoping for “how to Liszt”
Franz Liszt ikr
Thank you Paganini, very cool
Is this a good piece for beginners?
best violonist in the world 😈
This man probably believed that Mt. Everest was too small
Hi 🙋♀️
Hi Jill I
Thanks 🙏
Hi Jill
What
He made an even taller mount everest with those scales at the beginning.
Every time I begin to think I play it kinda good, I come back to this video to ground myself to the reality.
Todd?
Who played this, shlomo?
If you can't play half of a scale, don't even think about this piece.
How am is supposed to play the first few measures?
For reference I play saxophone
You don't
That's the neat part. You don't.
This mix tape is fucking fire
Theme song of Asian parents who make you play the violin
İf you swicth the playing speed to 1,25 you'll hear the paganini itself
Do 2x
Ling Ling could play it at double speed
He does practice 40 hours a day.
Cant escape from 2setvoilin comments😂😂😂😂
So much hate in the comments
Yea I can totally learn this in a day 😻
1*25 is the real paganini
How fun!
what in the most absolute mother of existence was that?!?!?!?!?!!?
can we just stop and think of how fast you have to play upbow staccato (probably flying spiccato)
i can truly say that this song is better than caprice 24
Do you heard anyone singing? Maybe in the rain?
*PIECE*
It's not a song, IT'S A *PIECE* DAMMIT!
"Song"
Piece not song
“Ok I finished my warmup time for my solo”
Sumina Studer- I can play this with the original bowings.
Augustin Hadelich- I can do the same- but better.
Kavakos- Amateurs.
Augustin- What was that punk?
Kavakos- Amateurs.
(Kavakos can play Pag 5 insanely fast)
Yes
Oh okay well. Where can I find the devil. Please give me his address
Paganini, the original Ling Ling
Nuts!
Paganini: Hey, I'm a big fan of your piano playing
Lizst: I see
Lady: "Damn mr. Paganini what can you do with your long flexible fingers?~"
Paganini:
i looked at the thumbnail expecting this to be somewhat easy, but then i clicked the video...and then i remembered its paganini
Busdriver - Imaginary Places Brought me Here.
The music sheets look scary af
Fun fact: Paganini is my birthday twin
TwoSet gang here 😎👍🏻 #paganinishreds
It doesn't sound like its original bowing, is it?
first shredder
How are you supposed to even slightly sightread this
If you’re sight-reading properly and not just attempting the piece at tempo on your first try, this is actually a pretty great piece to sight-read.
What if Liszt did a piano version of this...?
try 2x speed
Confirmed! Paganini had a pact with the devil. This piece is an undeniable proof.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Nah, just kidding. He only enjoyed trolling people
Paganini went sicko mode
This was just a normal Paganini warm-up written into page
🔊AYE🔇YO🔊 WHY🔇WE🔊GOING🔇SO🔊FAST🔇FOR?🔊
🔊AYE🔇
천재
is the flash?
Um
Ling ling would easily play this after one minute so XD
but, are you ling ling?!
Lingli Wang sadly I am not, but I am a fan of Ling Ling
but could Ling Ling write/create something as amazing as this?
imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but i can’t imagine another human being today not only being able to play this, but compose the pieces that paganini did during his time when people never played like this. that’s the true genius.
If you can play it slow, you can play it fast
Too good to play the repeat, eh?
Yeah, I regret posting these performances of the caprices mainly for that reason alone :(
Yeah! I'm trying to catch up!!
what a great way to make things harder -_-
don't worry guys
if you can play it slowly, you can play it quickly
Is the human?
Paganini just killed me
Ling ling considers this warmup.
0:00 starting
You call this easy Paganini pieces ? What is easy in this mad circus of notes in mastery arrangement by the greatest of all violinists ...Shri Pagananini Saheb Guru Pandit ...We all salute this great violinist who put all other composers and violinists in embarrassment....and confusion till few learned his techniques like Alexander Markov , of course Leonid Kogan the best.
I probably may not be able to reach this in this lifetime.
You're only as limited as you tell yourself you are!
@@TheExarion thanks❤
Why did you guys come from twoset? They tried to play this?
Twoset references Paganini a lot and people probably just wanted to check out more Paganini pieces. They probably have referenced this caprice though; it's one of the more famous ones
Umm....why?
Why not? :)
OMG is very good xd
Recently I started to play some paganini caprices, and I Just realized, in a way play paganini still is kind of impossible even for violin virtuosos, most of violinist even virtuosos in a way "cheat" in some caprices, for example this no. 5 most violinists dont play the original bow, and this caprices was composed as a way of etude Just for practice that bow, and no one except few violinists plays with original bow, another example caprice 24, no one plays exactly how paganini wrote some variations espcially the chords variation, no 16 a lot of violinists dont play that presto tempo with the original fingerings that paganini wrote, and so many examples of all paganini caprices, the only person I have seen he played exactly how paganini wrote is Salvatore Accardo, the rest of most violinists always change something like fingerings, bowings, tempo, change some instead of Sul G they play on the d string, etc. Is interesting tilo this days is still almost imposible play paganini trustworthy.
This gives me pain
Crazy