🤓👉 If do you like Pac-Man games check out all our Pac-Man videos here: ruclips.net/video/bru6VxAzTaw/видео.html 🤓👉 Check out all our comparisons and show the world that you are the greatest EXPERT in RETRO GAMES: ruclips.net/video/bru6VxAzTaw/видео.html
Obviously, the SNES version is pretty superior to the other versions, which are reskins of Fury of the Furries. It's nice that it finally got re-released on modern platforms, though with Ms. Pac-Man unfortunately edited out due to the messy legal troubles. Oh, and fun fact, there was going to be a Genesis version of this game as well, but it was cancelled.
SNES version completly wins, the level design, music, graphics, ALL, is not an copy of Fury of the Furries, like the other versions, basically is just a skin of Pac-Man.
I thought this was originally a SNES & gameboy game. But its actually a USA Mario 2 look a like. Interesting! Btw there was going to be a sega Genesis version but it was cancelled
@@jasonlee7816 I can imagine this game was originally made for SNES & Game Boy because Sega Genesis had Pac-Mania (why didn't they port/upgeade the NES version?) and then they decided to port it to consoles/computers that have tbat game too
@@vittosphonecollection57289Pac-Mania on the Sega Genesis/Mega-Drive should look, play, sound, like a 16-bit port instead it is an awful, crap, dreadful, garbage horrible, rubbish, terrible, 8-bit port or 12-bit port
@@jasonlee7816 Really? Even if it could've been an Arcade perfect port I still think it's good because it's like a more cartoony version of the game. But still I imagine that this is that kind of game which was planned to be exclusive during the making and it ends being ported
Holy crap...I never realized how much was cut from the new script that the captions in the Pac-Man Museum+ hack of the SNES version uses! ...One more thing about that compilation that will never make sense to me.
@@kajioukun That is the precise version of the ROM that was hacked, yes. Yet I do have to wonder if it was really worth using the JP version when they could have easily edited the English release's text and screens instead.
@@MusicalMinerdude i also wonder that too. my solution would be this: Japanese if the menus are in japanese English if the menus are in English English with subtitles if the menus are in non english languages
@@kajioukun Practical, but I imagine it would probably be "too much work" for Bamco and/or NOWPRO, LOL. Lord knows they skimmed over the emulation and audio/video QA. Unfortunately.
The face Pac-Man makes when he's falling in the intro lmao 🤣 😂 I don't even remember that when I played this game. I played it for snes. Enjoyed it mostly.
So from what i found out, the system req for this game on PC are a 386SX33 with 1mb of ram and vga. That is pretty lean. I cant really see a computer like that running this too well. I wonder what the Mac specs are for it? I wonder if my LCIII could run this?
Your LCIII can totally play this. I played the hello out of this on my LCIII back in the day. Along with this, Secret of Monkey Island, Tetris, Deliverance, Oxyd, Spectre, Tubular Worlds, Loom and Wolfenstein. The Mac wasn’t a bad gaming machine at all - just expensive.
@@pascalharris1 Ahh ok, thanks for the reply! I will have to dig it out of the storage room at some point and give those titles a try! I also have an LCII but I never had much luck getting much to run on that and be a good experience lol. The LCIII was a pretty large step up.
The more I watched each version, I wondered why the levels looked nothing like what I remembered, and seeing Fury of the Furries side by side with all the other port makes sense that the totally redesigned SNES version is the one in Museum+
Dude Retrosutra this is a really good comparison and the games plot seems to be interesting because it explains how Pac-Man became recognized well only in the game but the Gameboy version is the bad port though to be honest
@@IgnacioCalvo87 the Gameboy version does have limitations and Pac man in the game moves way to fast and since the game is played on a small screen you have to not mess by performing trial and error since you need to jump higher to get to platforms that are high up and certain areas and objectives that need to be completed
Huh, did not know Fury of the Furries was a reskin of a Pacman game. At least I assume it was that way. Wonder why the main character was reskinned for FotF while keeping other graphics more or less unchanged...
i played the GB one out of boredom once due to having a bunch of GB roms just laying around, and i found it really fun and thought it had great music. never knew it was just a port of an edited Fury of the Furries, how neat. might play the original sometime, but the GB one still seems more fun to me. the Game Gear and SNES ones seem to be entirely different games, and Museum+ is quite embarrassing - they didn't even hack the JP ver, they just got some subtitles over it that are extremely obvious. come on.
Actually the Game Gear version starts on the 2nd world. Dont know why but maybe cause of storage but the gameboy could handle all of them. (Except for the snow world)
🤓👉 If do you like Pac-Man games check out all our Pac-Man videos here: ruclips.net/video/bru6VxAzTaw/видео.html
🤓👉 Check out all our comparisons and show the world that you are the greatest EXPERT in RETRO GAMES: ruclips.net/video/bru6VxAzTaw/видео.html
Nerd emoji
Obviously, the SNES version is pretty superior to the other versions, which are reskins of Fury of the Furries. It's nice that it finally got re-released on modern platforms, though with Ms. Pac-Man unfortunately edited out due to the messy legal troubles.
Oh, and fun fact, there was going to be a Genesis version of this game as well, but it was cancelled.
why did the Sega Genesis/Mega-Drive version end up getting cancelled?
Well the snes port was cancelled anyway
@Jacob actually apple Macintosh is the perfect one as an apple computer including ms dos too
Actually that was a 8bit handheld game gear
The SNES Port Was Literally Released, @@josephfrye7342
SNES version completly wins, the level design, music, graphics, ALL, is not an copy of Fury of the Furries, like the other versions, basically is just a skin of Pac-Man.
Fury of furries does look fun and the controls and feel of the snes version just feels like a punishment even on museum +
@@EvanPrescott-jb4nt agree
Played the hell out of Fury of the Furries on Amiga and then PC. It was a nice suprise to see a GB version albeit with a Pac-Man skin.
Even though you don't see anyone dressing up as cartoon animals in this game.
I never had a clue that this Pacman game was just a reskin of the Furries game :O
Seems like a fun game. All versions looks nice, SNES being a standout.
Ahem and genesis/megadrive but this pac In time is an apple Macintosh computer release
Trust me, this game is a lot of things and fun is DEFINITELY not one of them.
Please tell me you're joking, genesis fan.
Pac-Man got sent to the most dangerous place of all.
*The 70s.*
I thought this was originally a SNES & gameboy game.
But its actually a USA Mario 2 look a like. Interesting!
Btw there was going to be a sega Genesis version but it was cancelled
Same and I also heard about a DOS veraion
why did the Sega Genesis/Mega-Drive version end up getting cancelled?
@@jasonlee7816 I can imagine this game was originally made for SNES & Game Boy because Sega Genesis had Pac-Mania (why didn't they port/upgeade the NES version?) and then they decided to port it to consoles/computers that have tbat game too
@@vittosphonecollection57289Pac-Mania on the Sega Genesis/Mega-Drive should look, play, sound, like a 16-bit port instead it is an awful, crap, dreadful, garbage horrible, rubbish, terrible, 8-bit port or 12-bit port
@@jasonlee7816 Really?
Even if it could've been an Arcade perfect port I still think it's good because it's like a more cartoony version of the game.
But still I imagine that this is that kind of game which was planned to be exclusive during the making and it ends being ported
I was waiting much time for this!
Holy crap...I never realized how much was cut from the new script that the captions in the Pac-Man Museum+ hack of the SNES version uses!
...One more thing about that compilation that will never make sense to me.
It's a hack from the super famicom version
@@kajioukun That is the precise version of the ROM that was hacked, yes. Yet I do have to wonder if it was really worth using the JP version when they could have easily edited the English release's text and screens instead.
@@MusicalMinerdude i also wonder that too. my solution would be this:
Japanese if the menus are in japanese
English if the menus are in English
English with subtitles if the menus are in non english languages
@@kajioukun Practical, but I imagine it would probably be "too much work" for Bamco and/or NOWPRO, LOL.
Lord knows they skimmed over the emulation and audio/video QA. Unfortunately.
Mi versión favorita es la de snes, la cual parece un remake.
The face Pac-Man makes when he's falling in the intro lmao 🤣 😂 I don't even remember that when I played this game. I played it for snes. Enjoyed it mostly.
Best Music: PC DOS, SNES
Best Graphics: SNES
Best Cutscenes: Amiga/CD32
Hosting a hockey spoof before the Superbowl, bold move here.
Also, how you say you’re Canadian without saying you’re Canadian.
2:56 it sounds like pac-man is eating the stone bricks xD
I have a question in the snes version in the main menu exist a option called "password" What is it?
I'm guessing a password save feature?
So from what i found out, the system req for this game on PC are a 386SX33 with 1mb of ram and vga. That is pretty lean. I cant really see a computer like that running this too well. I wonder what the Mac specs are for it? I wonder if my LCIII could run this?
Your LCIII can totally play this. I played the hello out of this on my LCIII back in the day. Along with this, Secret of Monkey Island, Tetris, Deliverance, Oxyd, Spectre, Tubular Worlds, Loom and Wolfenstein. The Mac wasn’t a bad gaming machine at all - just expensive.
@@pascalharris1 Ahh ok, thanks for the reply! I will have to dig it out of the storage room at some point and give those titles a try! I also have an LCII but I never had much luck getting much to run on that and be a good experience lol. The LCIII was a pretty large step up.
The more I watched each version, I wondered why the levels looked nothing like what I remembered, and seeing Fury of the Furries side by side with all the other port makes sense that the totally redesigned SNES version is the one in Museum+
can you also do versions comparison of fury of the furries?
Retrosutra can you also do versions comparison of pac attack
is Pac in Time a Canon?! Cause this game was included on Pacman Museum+!!
Very interesting!
thank you! :D
Dude Retrosutra this is a really good comparison and the games plot seems to be interesting because it explains how Pac-Man became recognized well only in the game but the Gameboy version is the bad port though to be honest
which GB version is a bad port? Well, the way I see it, I think it's very good, why do you say it's bad?
@@IgnacioCalvo87 the Gameboy version does have limitations and Pac man in the game moves way to fast and since the game is played on a small screen you have to not mess by performing trial and error since you need to jump higher to get to platforms that are high up and certain areas and objectives that need to be completed
Huh, did not know Fury of the Furries was a reskin of a Pacman game. At least I assume it was that way. Wonder why the main character was reskinned for FotF while keeping other graphics more or less unchanged...
It's actually the other way around, Pac in Time is a reskin/reversion of Fury of the Furries
Do Doom please,plenty of versions to compare.
8:51 JESUS, WHAT THE HELL? HOW MUCH OLDER BECOME THE GHOST WITCH OF NETOR!?😱
I LIKE -> ALL VERSIONS COMPARISON ! 💪🏿
Thats amazing
This is a sequel to Pac-Man 2 the new adventures or hello Pac-Man though
1:58 12:00
1:56
7:09
i played the GB one out of boredom once due to having a bunch of GB roms just laying around, and i found it really fun and thought it had great music. never knew it was just a port of an edited Fury of the Furries, how neat. might play the original sometime, but the GB one still seems more fun to me. the Game Gear and SNES ones seem to be entirely different games, and Museum+ is quite embarrassing - they didn't even hack the JP ver, they just got some subtitles over it that are extremely obvious. come on.
Actually the Game Gear version starts on the 2nd world. Dont know why but maybe cause of storage but the gameboy could handle all of them. (Except for the snow world)
Ms dos looks similar to the genesis (which never came out)
Really, How did you know that?
Furry of the furies...
12:00
6:14
12:33
Nice 🙂👍
Pac: *eating dirt*
Pac: ewwww
You’re so funny 😂
the best I could do 👍
LOVE IT!
Compare frogger
26:14 ESO SOY YO
fail. Should have have shown the amiga fury of the furries, which had awesome soundtrack far better than PC
Ahem you meant far better than the Super Nintendo/super famicom consoles also?
The last one looks like a bootleg. AMIGA has too bootlegs games, specially PACMAN.
Well because that game’s characters were replaced with Pac-Man
characters after that game came out.
Pac In Time is not a rip-off of Fury of the Furries.
fury of the furries makeover. I loved this 4 different fur balls - packman is just a silly outdated character :)
I dont think hes outdated, he's a classic legacy character in gaming afterall but he could use an update lol 😃
pacman*
The SNES and Pac-Man Museum + versions are a completely different game
Yea Pac In Time Is A Ripoff Of Fury Of The Furries
23:42
15:44