Great job as usual. One suggestion for the future: maybe leave the team/car name on screen while you’re talking about it (along with the stats)? It’s easy to look away for a moment or pause the video, and lose track of which exact team/car/year is being discussed.
Mate, you are becoming the GOAT (not Goatifi) of F1 history, tier lists, rankings and overall amazing content. Please don't ever change, your videos get me through the work day. Incredible work as always!
I’m not a huge F1 fan, but your videos are super helpful in learning about the interesting history of the sport. I appreciate the effort and research that you show, as well as your clear passion for the sport. Keep up the good work!
Oh yeah, videos like this, when you hear about each team and car, stack together and eventually you find yourself putting the dots together for other stories and recognizing parts of famous moments :)
Lauda, Cheever, Johansson,Rosberg,Watson,Hill and even Mansell would be surprised to hear Prost wasn't a particularly fast qualifier. Even Ayrton Senna knew his two closest teammates over a lap were Berger and Prost. Hakkinen had too few races to count. However, Gerhard went all out like a madman...yet was only a couple of hundredths closer. Mansell had the poles but Prost was more consistent and they were 8-8. Arnoux was destroyed in 81 closer next year, but had 18 poles. Watson had to use all his 34 year old wiles in 1980 to barely edge the rookie Prost. Senna was an anomaly you don't have today. Hamilton,Verstappen and Leclerc are very close as was Mansell, Prost and Berger before the Michael came along.
"Mansell had the poles but Prost was more consistent and they were 8-8." Well, then they were even in the qualifying duels and since only Mansell put the Ferrari on pole in 1990 it's awfully hard to claim that Prost was most consistent in *qualifying* . He was clearly more consistent in the *races* themselves but that doesn't automatically translate to consistency in qualifying. Likewise it was 5-5 in Renault poles for Prost and Arnoux in 1982. "Hamilton,Verstappen and Leclerc are very close" Verstappen didn't qualify on pole until his 93rd F1 race. But the Red Bull... Yes, *Ricciardo* put the same Red Bull on pole three times in 2016-2018. Leclerc came to Ferrari in 2019 and had 7 poles to Vettel's 2. Fact is Leclerc had more than both Hamilton and Bottas (5 each in 2019). "Mansell, Prost and Berger before the Michael came along." Well, both Prost and Mansell had retired from F1 by 1994 and Berger was stuck with Ferrari during their worst ever era. Schumacher's first pole was at the 1994 Monaco GP. More importantly the first race after Senna's death at Imola. So the field was rather *watered down* following Senna's death. Fact is the 1994 Monaco GP only had 4 previous winners. Something which hadn't been seen since the 1958 Morocco GP (Fangio had retired earlier in the year and Ascari was dead). Yes, 36 years prior. Who were the four previous winners btw? Schumacher, Hill, Berger and Alboreto(!). Like I said, watered down. A whole e lot easier to shine, especially with Senna gone.
@@McLarenMercedes More consistent in that Alain Qualified between 2nd and 13th, whilst Nigel 1st down to 17th. Prost was 4.5 on average Grid vs 4.69 for Mansell. Prost Qualified 2nd 4 times to Mansells 0. Both Qualified 3rd 3 times. At the skill street tracks of Phoenix, Monaco and Montreal Prost was much faster...Nigel a little quicker at Hungaroring. The most shocking is their finishing position. Even excluding full DNFs Mansell finished an average of 6th to Prosts 2nd!
Awesome video as usual, thanks a lot! Small mistake at 1:09:25, Jerez was not on the 1995 calendar, I assume you meant the European Grand Prix which is correct. This GP was held in Nürburgring like in 1996, Jerez being the European GP track in 1994 and 1997.
Gosh thank you so much for this video, it was such a treat! Not only the stories about teams and drivers but also tons of pictures and videos, especially of the lesser known, minnow cars.
Coloni-Ford - Basically a 1989 spec car, used for one driver and it never got out of pre-qualifying as it was just totally uncompetitive. The phoenix team of it, Andrea Moda was about the same in terms of total non-performance
Not entirely correct. From the German GP 1990 onwards Gachot managed to regularly beat the Prequalifiers only to qualify 30th in every Qualifying Coloni attended that year. The "After-Subaru" car with Cosworth engine was better then it's predeccessor (plus the Subaru engine was a joke)
Credit where it is due, this is fantastic. Your driver videos suffered for you not having seen the races, Nelson Piquet being done the dirtiest, that is not a problem here. An important record of an amazing time for the sport, reminds me of current day WEC. What a contrast to the insular gatekeeping of F1 today.
The thing I personally find really baffeling: 155 cars to look at, and the viable winners start only around the top 30, the _real_ winners only make up the top 20! Success in F1 simply never was well-balanced and never will be, which to me, despite my once enormous love for this sport, always appeared as one of it's bigger flaws.
So informative and accurate ! I've personally seen most of these cars over the years at grand prixs They have bought back wonderful memories of a much simpler but just as enjoyable f1 era ! Thank you so much made my day 😊
Traction control of the benneton 1994: Proof came out in 2014 when one of the '94 teammates came out and told that schumacher used traction control that year, explains why herbert was over a second slower per lap i guess Senna was right after all.
This is awesome. You did a great job with this. I can’t imagine how much time it must have taken to research and create this video. If you do on from the 80’s that would be awesome.
Another fact about the Life L190, the chassis they bought from First originally failed the FIA Crash Test, and there was only one of them ever made. Essentially, the Life team were running a deathtrap, and if it crashed, it meant their entire season was over. Also regarding Perry McCarthy, he would be more famously known as the "Original Stig" or the "Black Stig" (he had all black gear unlike Ben Collins' Stig who wore all white.)
The Tyrrell 026 had some good innovations, like the flick ups on the front wing endplates before most other teams. It was a pretty decent chassis. It’s biggest weakness was it’s diffuser which was tiny. A forced compromise because Tyrrell didn’t have the budget to do the necessary gearbox and drivetrain redesign to accommodate a competitive diffusor shape. This is why they ran a high rear wing angle at almost every event. A massive disadvantage for an otherwise decent package. Something we can see fully realised in 1999 with the Jordan.
The GR02 should be higher based on qualifying pace as it was unreliable in races as the team was running out of money. It qualified on the 6th row out of 13 several times, much better than a lot of higher ranked cars.
Also worth mentioning the Ferrari 310B had understeery issues, even though it was an upgrade from the 1996 car. Every car either had a poor aero/chassis (the McLaren also apparently understeered and oversteered at the same time) or had PU issues that year, though, except for the Williams
Very well documented. Very nice. I agree perfectly with the 92 and 93 Williams for being the fastest cars of the 90s. But The B194 should be much higher. It was very fast before regulation changes. and Schumy would have won 10 out of 14 GP he competed in (if you take Spa and Silverstone in consideration where he was penalised and DSQ)
The arrows a19 was a very good chassis held back by a poor engine. Just watch it around Monaco in the hands of Mika Salo in 1998 and it’s balance was sublime. It was a mistake to put the Minardi M198 ahead of it which objectively was an appalling car and new for that season whereas the Arrows was a year old and still managed to score a point.
I’ve been downloading many of these cars as mods in Assetto Corsa and this helps gauge a better aspect of which are good and which are…. Shiet. Thanks!
Whenever anyone describes anything other than the Life and it's gawdawful W12 as the worst car in F1 history I get murderously angry. Thanks for not making me angry, lol.
@joefrost8215 People bring it up because they talk about one thing, but ignore other incidents and issues. If you're going to blame Schumacher for the 94 incident, then hill needs to be blamed for the ones in 95. Thanks for stopping by retard.
Man thank you so much for this! Those are the cars of my youth and I watched every race with my father! We usually sat outside and grilled with the whole family while watching the races. I love and cherish those memories so much! As Germans we were of course huge Schumacher fans!
I consider the 1997 Lola T97/30 the last "stinker" in F1 history. While some Minardi, Arrows, Super Aguri and Williams cars which came later were bad they weren't "utterly hopeless" like the Lola T97/30 was. All those aforementioned were usually last but every now and then their drivers produced a spirited drive and put them ahead of the 2nd and 3rd worst cars. The Lola however would have been several seconds off the pace of even the 2nd worst car even if Schumacher and Villeneuve were the signed drivers. One can't help but to wonder if Lola had gotten their wish of 1998 entry granted. Would they have lasted several seasons? Who knows, maybe Honda would have rekindled their own relationship with them from the past and backed them as a "B-team" going into the 2000's...
Super Aguri SA05 was a stinker. It was used in 7 races and they were always at least one lap down to next finisher and qualified 1.5 second slower. Though considering that it was only an evolutionary version of 4 year old unreliable lower midfield car..it fared much better than expected. In 2002 we almost got a stinker: Phoenix racing was planning to run that year. They had bought 2001 Prost GP assets that hadn't been upgraded after last season..and Prost GP had one of the slowest cars that year. To make things worse they were planning to use Arrows F1-engines from 1998..when that had been the worst engine around. Unfortunately (for them) they had only bought those assets, not their team. So they were regarded as a new team and they would have to pay $48 million entry fee and obviously they didn't have that kind of money.
I am looking forward to this. From the Andrea Moda in which they tried to murder Perry McCarthy because they couldn't fire him to the legendary Williams FW14B! 😁😁😁
I really hope you are going to do the 80s next. so many crazy cars and iconic drivers, much more technological diversity (ground effect cars/turbochargers) ...it will be interesting
Yes! The 80s will be a great vid - if only for the '88-'89 pre-qualifying era cars. It's also the last video that's (relatively) straightforward to do - once you go pre-'81, you get into the minefield that is private entries (e.g. privately entered Williams and Lotus cars).
I thought it would probably be either the 1992 or 1993 Williams for No 1 but thought you may have gone the other way. Also thought the 1998 McLaren might nip a podium!!
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
Can't imagine how much time you spent on ranking the minnows who barely finished races 😭
Bro comments on every F1 youtube channel
Moin
@@RotaxMax9he is literally one of the presenters for Peter's podcast 😭
Finished races? A lot of teams didn’t even get thru qualifying!
Great job as usual. One suggestion for the future: maybe leave the team/car name on screen while you’re talking about it (along with the stats)? It’s easy to look away for a moment or pause the video, and lose track of which exact team/car/year is being discussed.
I second this, great idea
Putting the car name under the stats on the left, plus the year would be so great
For sure!
Mate, you are becoming the GOAT (not Goatifi) of F1 history, tier lists, rankings and overall amazing content. Please don't ever change, your videos get me through the work day. Incredible work as always!
I’m not a huge F1 fan, but your videos are super helpful in learning about the interesting history of the sport. I appreciate the effort and research that you show, as well as your clear passion for the sport. Keep up the good work!
I loved F1 until around 2007. The 80s and 90s were much better.
Oh yeah, videos like this, when you hear about each team and car, stack together and eventually you find yourself putting the dots together for other stories and recognizing parts of famous moments :)
Respect for ranking quite a lot of cars that don't deserve anything whatsoever, top work!
Finally can not wait to see this video and im sure the Life L190 is last on this list
90s is the greatest era. Thanks for your work.
No, the 90's were only cool until around 1995, then it was garbage.
Lauda, Cheever, Johansson,Rosberg,Watson,Hill and even Mansell would be surprised to hear Prost wasn't a particularly fast qualifier. Even Ayrton Senna knew his two closest teammates over a lap were Berger and Prost. Hakkinen had too few races to count.
However, Gerhard went all out like a madman...yet was only a couple of hundredths closer. Mansell had the poles but Prost was more consistent and they were 8-8. Arnoux was destroyed in 81 closer next year, but had 18 poles. Watson had to use all his 34 year old wiles in 1980 to barely edge the rookie Prost.
Senna was an anomaly you don't have today. Hamilton,Verstappen and Leclerc are very close as was Mansell, Prost and Berger before the Michael came along.
"Mansell had the poles but Prost was more consistent and they were 8-8." Well, then they were even in the qualifying duels and since only Mansell put the Ferrari on pole in 1990 it's awfully hard to claim that Prost was most consistent in *qualifying* . He was clearly more consistent in the *races* themselves but that doesn't automatically translate to consistency in qualifying.
Likewise it was 5-5 in Renault poles for Prost and Arnoux in 1982.
"Hamilton,Verstappen and Leclerc are very close"
Verstappen didn't qualify on pole until his 93rd F1 race. But the Red Bull... Yes, *Ricciardo* put the same Red Bull on pole three times in 2016-2018.
Leclerc came to Ferrari in 2019 and had 7 poles to Vettel's 2. Fact is Leclerc had more than both Hamilton and Bottas (5 each in 2019).
"Mansell, Prost and Berger before the Michael came along." Well, both Prost and Mansell had retired from F1 by 1994 and Berger was stuck with Ferrari during their worst ever era. Schumacher's first pole was at the 1994 Monaco GP. More importantly the first race after Senna's death at Imola. So the field was rather *watered down* following Senna's death. Fact is the 1994 Monaco GP only had 4 previous winners. Something which hadn't been seen since the 1958 Morocco GP (Fangio had retired earlier in the year and Ascari was dead). Yes, 36 years prior.
Who were the four previous winners btw? Schumacher, Hill, Berger and Alboreto(!).
Like I said, watered down. A whole e lot easier to shine, especially with Senna gone.
@@McLarenMercedes More consistent in that Alain Qualified between 2nd and 13th, whilst Nigel 1st down to 17th. Prost was 4.5 on average Grid vs 4.69 for Mansell. Prost Qualified 2nd 4 times to Mansells 0. Both Qualified 3rd 3 times. At the skill street tracks of Phoenix, Monaco and Montreal Prost was much faster...Nigel a little quicker at Hungaroring. The most shocking is their finishing position. Even excluding full DNFs Mansell finished an average of 6th to Prosts 2nd!
Awesome video as usual, thanks a lot! Small mistake at 1:09:25, Jerez was not on the 1995 calendar, I assume you meant the European Grand Prix which is correct. This GP was held in Nürburgring like in 1996, Jerez being the European GP track in 1994 and 1997.
This is exactly the content and analysis I subscribed for. There is no other channel that does it so thorough than yourself. Superb!
Thanks again for this beautiful trip through nostalgia 🙏
That’s exactly the video I hoped for. Nothing from F1 is more interesting than early 90s late 80s cars
Was waiting for #10 tbh.
its all more interesting imo
Pretty much so because of the bans. They only kept the paddle shifters and power steering.
Completamente de acordo.
New video from Peter Brook? I know what I’m doing for the next 2 hours
Well the Venturi thing escalated pretty quickly......
Your attention to detail in putting this together is unbelievable. Great work Peter!
Gosh thank you so much for this video, it was such a treat! Not only the stories about teams and drivers but also tons of pictures and videos, especially of the lesser known, minnow cars.
Y'know those videos you don't want to watch but you have to? This is one of those videos. Awesome fix for the off-season. Thanks.
Good or bad one thing for sure... This 90's cars are gorgeous.
The Life car must be the worst.. and FW14b the best ? (But still wonder what Mansell could have done with the FW15C )
I don't understand how this amazing video has only 15k views
The greatest F1 video from the greatest era in the sport!
Coloni-Ford - Basically a 1989 spec car, used for one driver and it never got out of pre-qualifying as it was just totally uncompetitive. The phoenix team of it, Andrea Moda was about the same in terms of total non-performance
Not entirely correct. From the German GP 1990 onwards Gachot managed to regularly beat the Prequalifiers only to qualify 30th in every Qualifying Coloni attended that year. The "After-Subaru" car with Cosworth engine was better then it's predeccessor (plus the Subaru engine was a joke)
Impressive presentation, thank you.
Credit where it is due, this is fantastic. Your driver videos suffered for you not having seen the races, Nelson Piquet being done the dirtiest, that is not a problem here. An important record of an amazing time for the sport, reminds me of current day WEC. What a contrast to the insular gatekeeping of F1 today.
The thing I personally find really baffeling:
155 cars to look at, and the viable winners start only around the top 30, the _real_ winners only make up the top 20!
Success in F1 simply never was well-balanced and never will be, which to me, despite my once enormous love for this sport, always appeared as one of it's bigger flaws.
Heard it on Patreon first, still gonna give the yt video some love❤
This is AMAZING!
So informative and accurate !
I've personally seen most of these cars over the years at grand prixs
They have bought back wonderful memories of a much simpler but just as enjoyable f1 era !
Thank you so much made my day 😊
I'm as far as 130, and as a lifelong Minardi fan I am absolutely amazed to be yet to see said Minardi.
Ive learned so much F1 history from your research. Thanks for the channel.
38:08 - Don't think we didn't hear that 😉
I think you really underrated the 95 williams car. A lot of their failures were up to driver error
what a nice view to the past. especially the first half of the video puts so many long forgotten teams on the map, really interesting.
Well done Peter. For 1990 Osella ran the FA1M at the first 2 races before introducing the FA1Me with very different sidepods.
Wow!! Was hopeing this was gonna be made thxu so much
Traction control of the benneton 1994:
Proof came out in 2014 when one of the '94 teammates came out and told that schumacher used traction control that year, explains why herbert was over a second slower per lap i guess
Senna was right after all.
This is awesome. You did a great job with this. I can’t imagine how much time it must have taken to research and create this video.
If you do on from the 80’s that would be awesome.
That Jordan 191 is one of the most beautiful F1 cars ever made
Another fact about the Life L190, the chassis they bought from First originally failed the FIA Crash Test, and there was only one of them ever made. Essentially, the Life team were running a deathtrap, and if it crashed, it meant their entire season was over.
Also regarding Perry McCarthy, he would be more famously known as the "Original Stig" or the "Black Stig" (he had all black gear unlike Ben Collins' Stig who wore all white.)
The Tyrrell 026 had some good innovations, like the flick ups on the front wing endplates before most other teams. It was a pretty decent chassis. It’s biggest weakness was it’s diffuser which was tiny. A forced compromise because Tyrrell didn’t have the budget to do the necessary gearbox and drivetrain redesign to accommodate a competitive diffusor shape. This is why they ran a high rear wing angle at almost every event. A massive disadvantage for an otherwise decent package. Something we can see fully realised in 1999 with the Jordan.
The GR02 should be higher based on qualifying pace as it was unreliable in races as the team was running out of money. It qualified on the 6th row out of 13 several times, much better than a lot of higher ranked cars.
Amazing video! Earned a quick subscriber, and will be adding views to your others as quickly as possible too 😊
A very detailed summary throughout. Well done!!!
Great video! Hope you'll be going further into F1 decades (80s, 70s, etc.), although the number of cars will inevitably increase
this is a really cool and interesting video idea 😍
could you do also 2010’s?
he already did 1 year ago
@@Salod7806 oopsie I meant 2010’s not 2000’s
Also worth mentioning the Ferrari 310B had understeery issues, even though it was an upgrade from the 1996 car. Every car either had a poor aero/chassis (the McLaren also apparently understeered and oversteered at the same time) or had PU issues that year, though, except for the Williams
Make a video talking about if the 2010 new team managed to survive to this day how the yould be in the actual grid.
Very well documented. Very nice. I agree perfectly with the 92 and 93 Williams for being the fastest cars of the 90s. But The B194 should be much higher. It was very fast before regulation changes. and Schumy would have won 10 out of 14 GP he competed in (if you take Spa and Silverstone in consideration where he was penalised and DSQ)
38:08 don't think we wouldn't notice! 😄
Amazing that F1 cars from this period had technology used in road cars today.
Ok, you got me! I have subscribed! Amazing work for this video! 👍👍👍👍
The MP4-14 should be higher imo. Regardless of that, good video
Didn't expect a Lando appearance in a 19-"90!!" video 😛
Nice subtle mention of Ricardo Tosser in there 😂
I still think that 93 williams is one of the prettiest f1 cars of all time too before they messed it all up and raised the noses
What an undertaking. 👌🏼
Great video,thanks!!
38:07
No pun intended, right?! 😅
I was hoping you start doing vids on the 90s, looking forward to older ones. Succesful grand prix cars before 1950 are interesting too imo
Man, Coloni surely build some horrific cars.
Who funds such an organization without any chance of even starting?
The Stewart Ford's were great looking cars. 👌
The arrows a19 was a very good chassis held back by a poor engine. Just watch it around Monaco in the hands of Mika Salo in 1998 and it’s balance was sublime. It was a mistake to put the Minardi M198 ahead of it which objectively was an appalling car and new for that season whereas the Arrows was a year old and still managed to score a point.
For the 80s Video, I'm predicting the MP4/2 to be the winner and the FW11 as 2nd. Both great succes in 2 or even 3 seasons
any darts fans here notice how there was technical directors called gary anderson and peter wright
34:56 why is the BAR/Tyrell missing half its frontwing in that picture?
I'd say the 2nd simtek should be much further up, at least compared to the first...
Before I watch Top 1 will probably bethe 1992 or 1993 Williams.
why does it say the first several cars had 0 races when they did race, great video though
The lotus 107 deserves a better ranking
15:39 the Pacific has to be the best looking worst car of all time
The 94 Simtek might be a close second
I’ve been downloading many of these cars as mods in Assetto Corsa and this helps gauge a better aspect of which are good and which are…. Shiet. Thanks!
How much has the editing killed you off?😂😂
38:09 Did you just call Rosset ... Tosser?
get that active suspension back jo
lola and the life cars neet the own tier slowe than a snall
Tbh i am *slightly* dissappointed there was no extra point/deduction for looking like shit or not lmao
1980s I waiting
Like a whiskey or bourbon?
Whenever anyone describes anything other than the Life and it's gawdawful W12 as the worst car in F1 history I get murderously angry. Thanks for not making me angry, lol.
Ligiers from 1990 to 1992 are overrated. Lotus from 1992 and 1993 are underrated.
Tyrrells are also way too high.
Yeah, for example, I was surprised to see Lotus 102B rated higher than 107, in which Häkkinen took couple 4th places, the result 102B did not achieve.
1980s cars
The Andrea Moda is such a shame. A more competent team would have gotten better results then the clown show that was Sassetti's crew.
You’re a shame
no such thing as the mafia
Lotus 102b better than 102d, 107, 107b wtf. 102b was garbage.
The FIRST, (To
To MY Knowledge, ADMISSION of WHY Senna DIED!! And YET, No One has been Charged!! ("KARMA" for Williams!!) DUH!! 🧐🧐🧐
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👌
ferrari 1997 should be lower, car was slow as fuck
The 94 accident in adelaide was controversial, but the accidents that hill caused the following year werent?
Yea, no british bias here....
Every F1 video I click on there’s always someone moaning about British bias, literally every video, it’s like paranoia. 😂
@joefrost8215
People bring it up because they talk about one thing, but ignore other incidents and issues. If you're going to blame Schumacher for the 94 incident, then hill needs to be blamed for the ones in 95.
Thanks for stopping by retard.
Man thank you so much for this!
Those are the cars of my youth and I watched every race with my father!
We usually sat outside and grilled with the whole family while watching the races.
I love and cherish those memories so much!
As Germans we were of course huge Schumacher fans!
9
I consider the 1997 Lola T97/30 the last "stinker" in F1 history.
While some Minardi, Arrows, Super Aguri and Williams cars which came later were bad they weren't "utterly hopeless" like the Lola T97/30 was. All those aforementioned were usually last but every now and then their drivers produced a spirited drive and put them ahead of the 2nd and 3rd worst cars. The Lola however would have been several seconds off the pace of even the 2nd worst car even if Schumacher and Villeneuve were the signed drivers.
One can't help but to wonder if Lola had gotten their wish of 1998 entry granted. Would they have lasted several seasons? Who knows, maybe Honda would have rekindled their own relationship with them from the past and backed them as a "B-team" going into the 2000's...
Super Aguri SA05 was a stinker. It was used in 7 races and they were always at least one lap down to next finisher and qualified 1.5 second slower. Though considering that it was only an evolutionary version of 4 year old unreliable lower midfield car..it fared much better than expected.
In 2002 we almost got a stinker: Phoenix racing was planning to run that year. They had bought 2001 Prost GP assets that hadn't been upgraded after last season..and Prost GP had one of the slowest cars that year. To make things worse they were planning to use Arrows F1-engines from 1998..when that had been the worst engine around.
Unfortunately (for them) they had only bought those assets, not their team. So they were regarded as a new team and they would have to pay $48 million entry fee and obviously they didn't have that kind of money.
Definitely a stench coming from the Lola but I think those HRTs weren't far off
the 2010 HRT and 2015 Manor were terrible tbf
I am looking forward to this. From the Andrea Moda in which they tried to murder Perry McCarthy because they couldn't fire him to the legendary Williams FW14B! 😁😁😁
That AGS JH25(B)…..first thing I thought when i saw it was ‘Alonso’s 2018 helmet….on wheels!’ 🤣
As we know Perry McCarthy, would be back in a big way when top gear resumed in 2002
One of the best F1 videos I’ve ever watched.
I really hope you are going to do the 80s next. so many crazy cars and iconic drivers, much more technological diversity (ground effect cars/turbochargers) ...it will be interesting
Yes! The 80s will be a great vid - if only for the '88-'89 pre-qualifying era cars. It's also the last video that's (relatively) straightforward to do - once you go pre-'81, you get into the minefield that is private entries (e.g. privately entered Williams and Lotus cars).
Said whatever you want, but as a child growing up that era, still love those liveries. 😂
I thought it would probably be either the 1992 or 1993 Williams for No 1 but thought you may have gone the other way. Also thought the 1998 McLaren might nip a podium!!
01:09:24 I don't remember F1 racing at Jerez in 1995 (Source: Far too many hours on Formula 1 for the PlayStation 1)
Wow I had absolutely no idea there were this many Lamborghini powered cars back then.
4 hours long? 💀