Hans Heyer should have been picked up by secret services for not only sneaking into an F1 race undetected, but for also managing 9 laps in a bright yellow car before anyone noticed!
I like how most of the early disqualifications were just "they got bump started... you can't do that" which does put to question why Senna wasn't disqualified because of that instead of him using the damn escape road
@@Rocky712_ Lewis could be put back precisely because his engine was still running in 2007. He was the only one who was able to avoid stalling as he left the track. Rules were changed after that to prohibit moving a car with the driver still in it.
@@RadeticDaniel Yeah, but it was still not allowed to get any outside assistance. They definitely could have DSQ´ed him for that, but they chose to just clarify the rules.
@@Rocky712_ "not get any outside assistance" is a very simple sentence that would be meaningless in a rule book over 200 pages. I get that the spirit of the rules were that a driver should be able to drove by themselves or retire the car. However, even though that's what the rules meant to say, it's not what they said. Otherwise he would have been disqualified anyways. That's why the 1 single page of rules from 1950 is now nearly 500 pages in 2024 =) He wasn't allowed help to restart the engine and it was strictly forbidden to push a car out of the gravel trap as spinning the wheels could injure marshals with high-speed debris. But in the end, there was absolutely nothing about hooking up a car with a running engine to the crane and placing it on track, because that is just too specific to even think about 😅
Moral of the video story, if you're driving in F1 and get stopped for whatever reason, don't get a push start to get back into the race or you're DQ'ed.
Back in the pre mass TV days with races on really long circuits, drivers must have thought they had more chance of getting away with push starts and cutting corners etc.
I don't understand why drivers in the 80s and 90s kept running to the spare car when they'd get disqualified for an illegal car change? I assume this is a situation where the team didn't properly notify the stewards or it's not allowed past a certain point of the race, but is allowed in some cases?
Even though he was DSQ, Mike Magill still got 17th in the 1958 Indy 500 Let that sink in, Also I'm curious what the reasoning was for his DSQ though, I wonder if IMS has the reason somewhere and would be willing to share it, but it was also the whole you go behind the wall, you are done, mindset that only change in 94 when NASCAR went there
I can't speak for the entire history of F1, but at the times the rule was that outside assistance was allowable IF there was deemed a too large danger to just leave the car stranded (remember, regular safety cars weren't a thing until 1993 ...). So you could get away with it if you could argue that it was "necessary" for safety. I think it was only Hamilton/China 2007 (you can find clips of that) that got any outside assistance definitely banned (btw, in some racing series like IndyCar it's still allowed; heck, in many endurance races your car might be returned on a truck to your garage and you're still allowed to continue (not LeMans though)). And, yeah, also if nobody noticed, before the times of TV cameras everywhere. I bet that "somehow" happened a lot on tracks like Hockenheim or the Nordschleife. e: also, I should clarify; "push start" and "pushed back on track" were two different things. You had to have your engine running, then you could be pushed back on track. You weren't allowed to get a "push start" if your engine died while beached (well, that was the idea anyway).
@Sp4mMe Monaco 1996 had a couple of interesting variations. Pedro Diniz had a push start at the chicane, but then retired in the pits at the end of the lap, then Eddie Irvine following his collision with Olivier Panis at Loews was moved from his position and able to bump start the car as he was going down the hill
how very apt i was looking into the Damon Hill DQ the other day to find out why he was underweight turned out to be a mixture of a water leak and ballast which was 7kg's this info came from the autocourse
They probably thought they could get away with it, as most race tracks back then were just public roads with no cameras in every singe m². They probably hoped no one will see them do that. It turns out they did, but it's still exiting cause seeing them do that so often, there probably was a couple of those pushbacks that no one else saw.
The 2024 George Russell one had nothing to do with tire wear, as the rules compensate for that. And in certain cases, they might even replace the tires for new ones and weight again.
@@alexlazebat839 I stopped trusting some reporting sources when the Red Bull cost cap breach happened. A lot of people and news outlets made articles and videos about it with information about what it was....And they were all wrong. Their interpretation of the rule was wrong and they still kept pushing the wrong version even after the FIA wrote an article explaining how the rule worked. And there's no excuse from it, as all those regulation documents are publicly available on the FIA website and are the exact same ones used officially. They even show where the documents were redacted, which stuff was added to it, etc.
Still think that Mercedes lost some ballast when rebuilding the car overnight before qualifying. With Tire wear, driver weight and plank wear not being low enough to trigger weight issue on qualifying,
@@russ99a yeah people say how was the car legal in qualifying and not the race which 2004 canada springs to mind, heidfeld was excluded from the gp in europe for being underweight and not allowed into the race
@@russ99a The car checks are done by sampling. They randomly check a number of cars per session. They didn't check George's car after Quali, but they checked Lewis'.
21:48 - Niki Lauda 1983 German GP. Picture seems to be of the Alfa Romeo’s not the McLaren’s, due to the numbers and black rear wings. Small and somewhat insignificant or even trivial detail in a wonderful video, as usual from this amazing channel
And we thought there was some dodgy calls by the stewarts in this decade, the 70’s were apparently a free for all Also I don’t know what car that is at 14:30 but it’s sick
@alexlazebat839 Full race preferably. Some of the highlights here on RUclips are 1 minute long, haha. I'll check out Pathe, because that would be awesome to watch! Thanks for the reply.
I feel sorry for the guy fixing it with wd40 and a spanner, but then get black flag for not carrying it on the car, I mean what did they expect back in the day your own toolshed carried along with you lol
For someone doing their best to pronounce the names of drivers well, it stands out as a sore thumb you call Thierry Boutsen "Bootsen". Bout, as in "about", so "aboutsen" without the a would be much better already...
One thing that is not in the video was that Sebastian Vettel got disqualified after qualifying from the 2012 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix because he had problems with his fuel pump and had to start from the pit lane. He ended up finishing 3rd in the race
This video should be shown to drivers/Marshalls/anyone at the track as an example of what not to do. Also over twenty push-start DQs and teams were STILL trying like if it hasn’t worked that many times already chances are it won’t work the next time.
2:34 I don't want to criticise you for pronounciation here, because expecting anyone to know how "Gueux" is pronounced is not fair. I just want to share that it's pronounced [ɡø]. To paraphrase The Tim Traveller from when his video about that track, that's not a place name, that's an involuntary noise, and how on earth does French need five letters for that sound?
There's 2 types of disqualification reasons:
Technical stuff
"Mum watch this"
my main takeaway from this video is that FIA officials hated it when you tried to get back into a race
"hated it" ?? They're just enforcing the rules
@@Lora_BeolabDefinitely a DTS generation person 🙄
@@Lora_Beolabthats what they were saying. thats how language works
And still hate it...
Are you implying that they hate some broken rules and love others?
There seems to be a recurring theme in the first few disqualifications...
Now: i got pushed off! he needs to get penalised
Then: i got pushed and i got dsq'd
Hans Heyer should have been picked up by secret services for not only sneaking into an F1 race undetected, but for also managing 9 laps in a bright yellow car before anyone noticed!
I feel like Peter is getting us ready for the all penalties in f1 explained
that is a whole series in itself
I'll be waiting for all DNFs in F1 explained
+10 Seconds for Car 31 and +15 Seconds for Car 20
Streets never forget that Kubica made it to the points position on his debut
I fall asleep to your videos. U help me sleep
Don’t worry I eventually watch them over again in the day without sleeping
SAME MAN wtf
I'm not sure if that is a compliment lol. I like to watch his (and many other people's videos) on a small window while I make my digital drawings.
thank you for making these F1 history type of videos, i think theyre really great
I like how most of the early disqualifications were just "they got bump started... you can't do that"
which does put to question why Senna wasn't disqualified because of that instead of him using the damn escape road
Or Lewis Hamilton at the German GP 2007 when the crane put him out of the gravel and he continued driving.
@@Rocky712_ Lewis could be put back precisely because his engine was still running in 2007. He was the only one who was able to avoid stalling as he left the track.
Rules were changed after that to prohibit moving a car with the driver still in it.
@@RadeticDaniel Yeah, but it was still not allowed to get any outside assistance. They definitely could have DSQ´ed him for that, but they chose to just clarify the rules.
There probably would have been more arguing had Hamilton finished in the points. But he didn't, so perhaps nobody cared that much after the fact.
@@Rocky712_ "not get any outside assistance" is a very simple sentence that would be meaningless in a rule book over 200 pages.
I get that the spirit of the rules were that a driver should be able to drove by themselves or retire the car. However, even though that's what the rules meant to say, it's not what they said. Otherwise he would have been disqualified anyways.
That's why the 1 single page of rules from 1950 is now nearly 500 pages in 2024 =)
He wasn't allowed help to restart the engine and it was strictly forbidden to push a car out of the gravel trap as spinning the wheels could injure marshals with high-speed debris.
But in the end, there was absolutely nothing about hooking up a car with a running engine to the crane and placing it on track, because that is just too specific to even think about 😅
Moral of the video story, if you're driving in F1 and get stopped for whatever reason, don't get a push start to get back into the race or you're DQ'ed.
yes but lewis hamilton can get a crane
@@alexlazebat839Yeah. He should've been DQ'd because of that... But noooooo. FIA had their new golden boy
@@LoganHunter82 well he's black
Unless you were that Schumacher.
@@LoganHunter82 yes i noticed my other comment got deleted but i would say it the race card
I love how Peter is super factual in the descriptions, serious voice and all. And then all of a sudden "Bottas went bowling". Love these vids
Do F2 next (half of it basicly Richard Verschoor)
Back in the pre mass TV days with races on really long circuits, drivers must have thought they had more chance of getting away with push starts and cutting corners etc.
these spare car disqualifications were a bit ridiculous looking back
I don't understand why drivers in the 80s and 90s kept running to the spare car when they'd get disqualified for an illegal car change? I assume this is a situation where the team didn't properly notify the stewards or it's not allowed past a certain point of the race, but is allowed in some cases?
Drinking Game: Take a shot every time there is a mention of 'outside interference'
Sad to see the 2010s section of the video be that short, bring back DSQs
Even though he was DSQ, Mike Magill still got 17th in the 1958 Indy 500
Let that sink in, Also I'm curious what the reasoning was for his DSQ though, I wonder if IMS has the reason somewhere and would be willing to share it, but it was also the whole you go behind the wall, you are done, mindset that only change in 94 when NASCAR went there
Just looking at the first DSQ, I so funny to see even today fans pushing Rally cars or helping them when they crash
Great video, sir.
Another fine dive into the more obscure and forgotten.
Good work 👌🏼
suggestion topic : every race when the driver to pass chequered flag first was not declared as winner
please mention 1973 canadian gp
Imagine being disqualified because “the nipple has come off”. 😂
Seb's DSQ in Hungary 2021 was painful...
Love the content 🙌❤
Why did all those drivers even bother with the push start, must have some occasions where they got away with it so it was worth a try
My guess would be, that a lot of the push starts weren't noticed and therefore there was a chance that they would be able to continue racing.
I can't speak for the entire history of F1, but at the times the rule was that outside assistance was allowable IF there was deemed a too large danger to just leave the car stranded (remember, regular safety cars weren't a thing until 1993 ...). So you could get away with it if you could argue that it was "necessary" for safety.
I think it was only Hamilton/China 2007 (you can find clips of that) that got any outside assistance definitely banned (btw, in some racing series like IndyCar it's still allowed; heck, in many endurance races your car might be returned on a truck to your garage and you're still allowed to continue (not LeMans though)).
And, yeah, also if nobody noticed, before the times of TV cameras everywhere. I bet that "somehow" happened a lot on tracks like Hockenheim or the Nordschleife.
e: also, I should clarify; "push start" and "pushed back on track" were two different things. You had to have your engine running, then you could be pushed back on track. You weren't allowed to get a "push start" if your engine died while beached (well, that was the idea anyway).
@Sp4mMe Monaco 1996 had a couple of interesting variations. Pedro Diniz had a push start at the chicane, but then retired in the pits at the end of the lap, then Eddie Irvine following his collision with Olivier Panis at Loews was moved from his position and able to bump start the car as he was going down the hill
how very apt i was looking into the Damon Hill DQ the other day to find out why he was underweight turned out to be a mixture of a water leak and ballast which was 7kg's this info came from the autocourse
Fun fact: Felipe & Fisi in 2007 remain the most recent DSQ's to happen during a race. All DSQ's since have been post-race.
"he was disqualified, handing elio de angelis the win"
>next entry
"elio de angelis, 1985 australian grand prix"
you could not script this
Great idea for a video, also when are we gonna get the ranking of every 1980s car
disqualifications then: you killed 10 people during the event(negotiable) . . .
disqualifications now: NOOOOO you were 2 grams below the weight limit
Clearly a bin Russell fan
I commented first but got disqualified
Man, apart from the obvious tragedies the 1994 season was such a shitshow
Why do they even bother to push start if it's so clearly banned?
They probably thought they could get away with it, as most race tracks back then were just public roads with no cameras in every singe m². They probably hoped no one will see them do that. It turns out they did, but it's still exiting cause seeing them do that so often, there probably was a couple of those pushbacks that no one else saw.
Respect for pfp
@@snobey thank you bro
@@istvanvalkai I was talking to the comment author, but your is very neat too. Double respect
watch the film grand prix 1966 no dont push me you'll dq me
The 2024 George Russell one had nothing to do with tire wear, as the rules compensate for that. And in certain cases, they might even replace the tires for new ones and weight again.
yes i was looking at damon hill underweight bit vague looked everywhere the autocourse said 7kgs underweight water leak and ballast problems
@@alexlazebat839 I stopped trusting some reporting sources when the Red Bull cost cap breach happened. A lot of people and news outlets made articles and videos about it with information about what it was....And they were all wrong. Their interpretation of the rule was wrong and they still kept pushing the wrong version even after the FIA wrote an article explaining how the rule worked. And there's no excuse from it, as all those regulation documents are publicly available on the FIA website and are the exact same ones used officially. They even show where the documents were redacted, which stuff was added to it, etc.
Still think that Mercedes lost some ballast when rebuilding the car overnight before qualifying. With Tire wear, driver weight and plank wear not being low enough to trigger weight issue on qualifying,
@@russ99a yeah people say how was the car legal in qualifying and not the race which 2004 canada springs to mind, heidfeld was excluded from the gp in europe for being underweight and not allowed into the race
@@russ99a The car checks are done by sampling. They randomly check a number of cars per session. They didn't check George's car after Quali, but they checked Lewis'.
I heard that Kubica DSQ was caused by underweight because fire extinguisher activated during the race
Could you also make a video about every driver ban in history?
Do every "Retired" up to 2024 next.
Dude that would be like a 24h video
Missed your videos and voice 😂🎉
21:48 - Niki Lauda 1983 German GP. Picture seems to be of the Alfa Romeo’s not the McLaren’s, due to the numbers and black rear wings. Small and somewhat insignificant or even trivial detail in a wonderful video, as usual from this amazing channel
Fire stuff
I keep reading your user name as "Peter Brock"
my favorite
individual: hans heyer 1977
team: tyrell 1984
should disqualify:
alonso 2008 singapore
mclaren 2007 with drivers because of spygate
how do so many people get dqs from push starts.... from officials!!!!!
And we thought there was some dodgy calls by the stewarts in this decade, the 70’s were apparently a free for all
Also I don’t know what car that is at 14:30 but it’s sick
so, don't push it
Gotcha
Does anyone know what the oldest/earliest race is that I can watch in full on youtube is? And what should I search for?
i know pathe news has found 1950 gb grand prix full or highlights?
@alexlazebat839 Full race preferably. Some of the highlights here on RUclips are 1 minute long, haha. I'll check out Pathe, because that would be awesome to watch! Thanks for the reply.
@@jamesoshea580 yeah i watch highlights when disqualifications but 1960 1970's might have full races no murray walker
2020 no sound
Nice.
I'm the first to comment on ur video🙌
I'm the first to say you're pathetic for mentioning it.
I feel sorry for the guy fixing it with wd40 and a spanner, but then get black flag for not carrying it on the car, I mean what did they expect back in the day your own toolshed carried along with you lol
For someone doing their best to pronounce the names of drivers well, it stands out as a sore thumb you call Thierry Boutsen "Bootsen". Bout, as in "about", so "aboutsen" without the a would be much better already...
It's pronounced "bootsen", plenty of videos on RUclips attest to that.
@@SpaceHCowboy which Belgian channel says "bootsen"? Your arguments are hilarious; they do it wrong, so this wrong is right.
Stay a loser mate!
Thierry Marc Boutsen (French pronunciation: [tjɛ.ʁi but.sɛn]
U in French, as in "coup"
Facts, cope.
ruclips.net/video/mHAZzL2qRMw/видео.htmlsi=I0pQ9NnllFF6JnvH
Mega burn, from the man himself.....
I give you Thierry Boutsen...
Bravo, bravo 👏🏼👏🏼
0:23 That is, near as makes no difference, 10% of all events seeing at least one DQ.
7:19
German for, Back straight
BABE WAKE UP PETER BROOKS POSTED A NEW VID 🔥🔥🔥
One thing that is not in the video was that Sebastian Vettel got disqualified after qualifying from the 2012 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix because he had problems with his fuel pump and had to start from the pit lane. He ended up finishing 3rd in the race
hamilton brazil 21 is also not listed. Peter just did every race dsq
@@Epii_yeah I think its clear that he is just talking about race dsq and not qualifying
@@Epii_ was that touching verstappen car putting germs on it
Not far off to say that since Covid was still cracking in 2021@@alexlazebat839
This video should be shown to drivers/Marshalls/anyone at the track as an example of what not to do.
Also over twenty push-start DQs and teams were STILL trying like if it hasn’t worked that many times already chances are it won’t work the next time.
Kudos to Al Pease for keeping his head strong and still going despite seeing everyone get past him dozens of times 🤣
35:46 2 race ban right before the start of the German grand prix weekend 😂
I didn't get with team and drivers stupidity. They know pretty aware rules, still they breaking them.
I wonder how many times a driver broke the rules but got away with it because stewards haven't noticed in time.
sshhhhhh
most of the video
push start disqualified later
There was also Ferrari at the 1999 Malaysian gp
Take a shot every time you hear respectively
Great video
2:34 I don't want to criticise you for pronounciation here, because expecting anyone to know how "Gueux" is pronounced is not fair. I just want to share that it's pronounced [ɡø]. To paraphrase The Tim Traveller from when his video about that track, that's not a place name, that's an involuntary noise, and how on earth does French need five letters for that sound?
Quite a few of the pronunciations are questionable tbf.