The Marshall seems to be a bit brighter. Those drum snars are sharp. However the Klipsch seems to have a tad more bass. In my opinion it really depends on the type of music you listen to, but i would call this a tie.
In this test, of course the one win. So I recommend you should try more kind of melodies. Klipsch has passive bass, that have strong field in deep bass and slow bast, but marshall will win with speed bass. For vocal test, marrshall will wins. I choose The one
It makes perfect sense to eq sound devices to the closest sound signature possible when comparing. I always wondered why reviewers didn't do this when reviewing high end sound devices. I think for most people spending this kind of money the performance is way more important than a offset sound signature, that can easily be tweaked with an eq. It's great to finally see someone use their noodle!!
Because you want a baseline to compare "neutral" against "neutral". A lot of people don`t want to equalize, I personally do, often even song to song, but an un-edited sound signature tells a tale. A lot of people use players that don`t have an EQ, and a lot of people don`t want to mess with it. THAT makes perfect sense to most. I am not one of those people, but trying to make one speakers sound as much as another doesn`t really make any sense at all, why would you even try to get a different speaker if that was the case? People choose different speakers because they want a specific sound, not because they want to EQ the shit out of something to make it sound the way they want. You buy something that sounds pleasing to you, you don`t buy something that sounds OK, just to EQ it so it pleases you, that would be idiotic.. "Oh, I like the Sony sound, or the Klipsch sound, but I`ll buy Infinity and use an equalizer" No.. It DOESN`T make perfect sense.. "Use your noodle" and buy something that fits your need as closely as possible, THEN finetune the EQ and get what you want instead of messing with something that sounds completely different and "make due" with the result.. "Oh you like jazz, well I play blues, but I can jazz it up if you like" pffffh! What`s the point of having a signature sound if you`re just gonna EQ it anyway, just get anything remotely neutral and EQ it.. "most people spending this kind of money" don`t want to mess with anything, they spend money to get what they want, not to spend money first, and time later to make it into something useful to them. It would be like going to a 5 star resort then carrying your own bags, clean your room and pay double on the way out..
I'm watching this on my phone whilst bluetoothing it to my marshall kilburn. The kilburn has a better dynamic range with a crisper fuller sound. But then I am listening through a marshall kilburn.
I'm in love with this thing. In our store they have one on display. And gosh does it sound good. When I turn the volume up, it plays the music loud effortlessly.
They were just different. I think the Klipsch sound is more "HiFi" than the Marshal, and had deeper bass. A little boomy at the same settings. The Marshall bass had more snap. The midrange response was very different. The Marshall sounded more like a PA, same transparency.
@@isaiahbaca-lafore8806 is stanmore better? I am looking for a good speaker for instrumental music. Like meta and classical. Killburn's drum beats ware very dissapointing
Klipsch also (still) makes the ProMedia 2 computer speakers. Put THOSE drivers in a cabinet with a bluetooth module and it would sound superior to the "The One" or "The Three" bluetooth speakers they also sell for twice as much.
I have BeoPlay A2, do you think Klipsch The ONE is better ? Not sure of that if i look at description (56hz bass extension vs 55hz, 30W RMS VS 60 for A2) despite of the huge weight difference, it's weird. If you could do a test, it will be awesome !
Man u got fu*kinig great channel!!! thank u for all review. The one and only who make pure speaker vs speaker competition. Can u next time make Marshall bigboy WOBURN vs with HK or with some u prefer and advice. Wanna buy WOBURN or HK ,can`t choose between them. I recommended ur channel for all my friend.
I have had the marshall for half year now, and i would say that it is very good for listening heavy metal / rock music and pop. If you listen trap music or bass raping remix music, buy a jbl.
Why have you put full bass and treble on the Marshall? Surely the standard setting should have been used first, then if not happy, move the bass and treble up a notch, as is, you have done the Marshall a dis- service, making it sound cheap. Never the less I would still buy the Klipsch over the Marshall
A review with 40% bass and 60% treble on the marshall along with vocal tracks would do justice, the Klipsch actually kills the Marshall in the mid range which is not possible to even hear here Please upload a video with the settings i recommend you will really see what i mean
Какой бред вот так сравнивать аккустику.... Поехал в магазин за Marshall , а уехал с klipsch. Ну ни в какое сравнение не идет. Сейчас смотрю это сравнение со звуком на Klipsch - аж смешно, звук как из унитаза :))))
John-Marc Stanley, then you’d be using the wrong system. Opt for something louder and play at 50% volume. No manufacturer intends on these being played at max. It WILL distort the sound quality.
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Come on Marshall! 😑 Stanmore III vs Woburn III vs Acton III Review [Sound Samples]](/img/1.gif)
The Marshall seems to be a bit brighter. Those drum snars are sharp. However the Klipsch seems to have a tad more bass. In my opinion it really depends on the type of music you listen to, but i would call this a tie.
Because he set the treble and bass at 10
In this test, of course the one win. So I recommend you should try more kind of melodies. Klipsch has passive bass, that have strong field in deep bass and slow bast, but marshall will win with speed bass. For vocal test, marrshall will wins. I choose The one
It makes perfect sense to eq sound devices to the closest sound signature possible when comparing. I always wondered why reviewers didn't do this when reviewing high end sound devices. I think for most people spending this kind of money the performance is way more important than a offset sound signature, that can easily be tweaked with an eq. It's great to finally see someone use their noodle!!
thanks a lot bro
Because you want a baseline to compare "neutral" against "neutral".
A lot of people don`t want to equalize, I personally do, often even song to song, but an un-edited sound signature tells a tale.
A lot of people use players that don`t have an EQ, and a lot of people don`t want to mess with it.
THAT makes perfect sense to most.
I am not one of those people, but trying to make one speakers sound as much as another doesn`t really make any sense at all, why would you even try to get a different speaker if that was the case?
People choose different speakers because they want a specific sound, not because they want to EQ the shit out of something to make it sound the way they want.
You buy something that sounds pleasing to you, you don`t buy something that sounds OK, just to EQ it so it pleases you, that would be idiotic..
"Oh, I like the Sony sound, or the Klipsch sound, but I`ll buy Infinity and use an equalizer"
No..
It DOESN`T make perfect sense..
"Use your noodle" and buy something that fits your need as closely as possible, THEN finetune the EQ and get what you want instead of messing with something that sounds completely different and "make due" with the result..
"Oh you like jazz, well I play blues, but I can jazz it up if you like" pffffh!
What`s the point of having a signature sound if you`re just gonna EQ it anyway, just get anything remotely neutral and EQ it..
"most people spending this kind of money" don`t want to mess with anything, they spend money to get what they want, not to spend money first, and time later to make it into something useful to them.
It would be like going to a 5 star resort then carrying your own bags, clean your room and pay double on the way out..
@@afrog2666 You're both right. It's good to hear both non-eq'd and matched sound.
I'm watching this on my phone whilst bluetoothing it to my marshall kilburn. The kilburn has a better dynamic range with a crisper fuller sound. But then I am listening through a marshall kilburn.
I'm in love with this thing. In our store they have one on display. And gosh does it sound good. When I turn the volume up, it plays the music loud effortlessly.
Mr. 2cents. Which one?
give me 1 cent
They were just different. I think the Klipsch sound is more "HiFi" than the Marshal, and had deeper bass. A little boomy at the same settings. The Marshall bass had more snap. The midrange response was very different. The Marshall sounded more like a PA, same transparency.
I'm going with the klipsch because I have got one for Christmas 😊
Is it technically possible to hear any difference?
Klipsch wins! Alright everybody back to work...
Klipsch!!!!!!
Well it's not going against the Stanmore so...
@@isaiahbaca-lafore8806 is stanmore better? I am looking for a good speaker for instrumental music. Like meta and classical. Killburn's drum beats ware very dissapointing
@@gouthambolt Kilburn is not as powerful as the Acton and Stanmore, different league.
I WOULD LIKE LISTEN JAZZ IN THIS TEST
Does the marshal turn up to 11?
joinerman69 😂
Hahahahaha...lol...
This vs the fives. Since both are wireless bluetooth which is better for future hook up into full HT?
Marshall still sounds crisper to me :)
klipsch the one vs audioengine b2 pls
Klipsch no contest
50% volume marshall is nice for me.. they are both unique
Who tf listen to Marshall's on full bass, full treble 😂
And who tf listen to klipsch on 100% volume 🤣
周慕銘 HAHAHAH
when compared to the klipsch - the marshall had to be recorded with full bass and treble , otherwise it would sound tinny compared to the klispch
exactly my point - there is hardly a scenario where you would need to crank it to max - it is loud enough even at 50%
You should put Marshall in normal and them full bass and treble to people think to buy it can see how is work thanks for your video
Klipsch is super crisp 👌 but they seem fairly close
Klipsch also (still) makes the ProMedia 2 computer speakers. Put THOSE drivers in a cabinet with a bluetooth module and it would sound superior to the "The One" or "The Three" bluetooth speakers they also sell for twice as much.
I have BeoPlay A2, do you think Klipsch The ONE is better ? Not sure of that if i look at description (56hz bass extension vs 55hz, 30W RMS VS 60 for A2) despite of the huge weight difference, it's weird.
If you could do a test, it will be awesome !
Man u got fu*kinig great channel!!! thank u for all review. The one and only who make pure speaker vs speaker competition. Can u next time make Marshall bigboy WOBURN vs with HK or with some u prefer and advice. Wanna buy WOBURN or HK ,can`t choose between them. I recommended ur channel for all my friend.
How is this EQing anyway wise??
First 15 sec. enough.. what is the rest for?
Actually there are different tracks. The track halfway through shows the Marshall pull ahead for a while.
These two seriously amazing speakers. Please do a Bose Revolve+ VS Marshall Kilburn :) Really looking forward to that comparison!!
working on it
soundwise channel that will be amazing!
The Marshall will win. Had a Bose Revolve + and returned it because it sounded like crap for $300.
Im trying to weigh btw marshall and klipsch can anyone help me to make a decision?
I have had the marshall for half year now, and i would say that it is very good for listening heavy metal / rock music and pop. If you listen trap music or bass raping remix music, buy a jbl.
Vivi Erina Klipsh all day everyday forever....Now go get it. Ur welcome....
Why have you put full bass and treble on the Marshall? Surely the standard setting should have been used first, then if not happy, move the bass and treble up a notch, as is, you have done the Marshall a dis- service, making it sound cheap. Never the less I would still buy the Klipsch over the Marshall
I have a Klipsh. I will drop or sell my bose revolve+
He shouldn't put full bass and treble only in Marshall its not equal
A review with 40% bass and 60% treble on the marshall along with vocal tracks would do justice, the Klipsch actually kills the Marshall in the mid range which is not possible to even hear here
Please upload a video with the settings i recommend you will really see what i mean
Marshall 🎼🎵🎶📻 is the best portable music
klipsch win .
how about compare with woburn
in my opiinion both win, but ive heard that the klipsch has distortion at 100% volume!
the klipsch really doesnt need to go to max vol - its really loud enough even t 50%
nah 50% aint enough for me xD
i already bought the marshall, just waiting for Christmas to open it
MIg uel
Then don`t buy a bluetooth speaker, buy a boomblaster or something
MIg uel then dont be buying a small bluetooth speaker and get something bigger.
Marshall has better treble
Какой бред вот так сравнивать аккустику.... Поехал в магазин за Marshall , а уехал с klipsch. Ну ни в какое сравнение не идет. Сейчас смотрю это сравнение со звуком на Klipsch - аж смешно, звук как из унитаза :))))
Wat?!
Is the speaker rechargeble?
Of course
2:00 soundtrack title please?
Fast Lane - Lakey Inspired
Klipsch has better low end. But both clean speaker's
More variety of music would have been nice --some vocals (male and female) and some mid range instruments like trumpet and sax.
Thx!!
Hi, does the sound get distorted at max volume ?
Why on earth max volume?....
@@luisfernandzramirez2543 Backyard Party. Not uncommon to use a high end portable outdoors.
John-Marc Stanley, then you’d be using the wrong system. Opt for something louder and play at 50% volume. No manufacturer intends on these being played at max. It WILL distort the sound quality.
Marshall
Pretty close : hard to choose
Thank you!!
Klipsch the one vs tronsmart 5w, waterproof and €30 ...
If you gonna do videos like this some of us wanna know how loud these can really get or get a good idea anyway
Im not pro but i choose Klipsch
Compare Marshall Kilburn with Apple HomePod
Shubham Soni so stupid
Sounds great through my tablet not!
2:43
Sound marshall >>> klipsch
kilburn good👍
Klipsch win
Win Marshall Killburn
Mar 100 / klip 80
Klipsch
The same boomy vintage looking crap
No chance for the marshall