LeRoy Froom on The Human Nature of Christ in Questions on Doctrine

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 апр 2022
  • LeRoy Froom on The Nature of Christ in QOD
    To learn more visit seventhdaypress.org/
    Contact Information:
    United States Phone: +1 256 495 8388
    Canada Phone: +1 306 800 1230
    info@seventhdaypress.org
    Seventh Day Press
    P.O Box 33
    Bryant, AL 35958

Комментарии • 18

  • @morgan1888able
    @morgan1888able 2 года назад +5

    Praise the Lord, thank you Brother Jason and Brother Vasko

  • @edmondclement4005
    @edmondclement4005 2 года назад +4

    Amen🙏🏾
    Glory and Praises unto our heavenly Father for giving us His only begotten Son Jesus Christ. His humanity is our everything unto salvation. Thanks so much for sharing beloved brethrens Vasko Belovski and Jason Hernberg, rightly dividing the word of truth, it's a blessing of this ministry. Following from Uganda 🇺🇬. Delightful blessed holy Sabbath worship experience.
    Maranatha 🙏❤️🙏

  • @WishkoWagape
    @WishkoWagape 2 года назад +2

    Thank you brethren for this profoundly powerful examination and evaluation of the evidence inspired by the merciful love and wisdom of the Spirit of Prophecy. "In all that He did (in His human nature as the Son of Man), Christ was co-operating with His Father. Ever He had been careful to make it evident that He did not work independently; it was by faith and prayer that He wrought His miracles. Christ desired all to know His relationship with His Father. “Father,” He said, “I thank Thee that Thou hast heard Me. And I knew that Thou hearest Me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that Thou hast sent Me.” Here the disciples and the people were to be given the most convincing evidence in regard to the relationship existing between Christ and God." (EGW DA p.536) God bless!

  • @lesleymcbow9304
    @lesleymcbow9304 2 года назад +1

    Praise God for this message. A correct understanding of sin is so crucial. There are others who preach a different understanding of the definition of sin and are leading people into a false belief. There is only one definition of sin and that is as Scripture says. It’s transgression of the Law. It’s not by being born a human being.
    Thank you Jason and Vasko. May God continue to lead and guide you and watch over you. God’s richest blessings to you.

    • @elvisfinutu935
      @elvisfinutu935 2 года назад

      I don't know if there is only one definition of sin in the bible! What about Romans 14:23; Jacob 4:17 ???

  • @TheBishopmax
    @TheBishopmax Год назад

    Thank you for exposing the 'Omega' of apostasy. Our pioneers (Philadelphia) were guided by the Holy Spirit and Laodicea has no business removing the Old Waymarks. I have tested our prophetic understanding of the cleansing of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment and found them to be true. Also the remnant church definitely had the testimony of Jesus in the gift of prophecy given to Ellen White. May we humbly and boldly stand upon the pillars of our faith erected by the pioneers. Thank you for this video.

  • @leeannacevedo
    @leeannacevedo 2 года назад

    Amen. Beautiful study 🙏🏽❤️

  • @mdmorell
    @mdmorell 2 года назад

    "Biologically based" could also mean, as a result of dynamic and changing biological conditions dependent on disease, nutrition, the laws of health as it relates to body chemistry. Isn't that true?

    • @S.D.P
      @S.D.P  2 года назад

      Yes indeed.

  • @tennisvidzzz3941
    @tennisvidzzz3941 6 месяцев назад

    Ellen White was correct.......Christ did not have sinful propensities as we do. Thank God! I worship a big Savior....not someone like me. Read this quote from Ellen White....she is spot on:
    Be careful, exceedingly careful as to how you dwell upon the human nature of Christ. Do not set Him before the people as a man with the propensities of sin. He is the second Adam. The first Adam was created a pure, sinless being, without a taint of sin upon him; he was in the image of God. He could fall, and he did fall through transgressing. Because of sin, his posterity was born with inherent propensities of disobedience. But Jesus Christ was the only begotten Son of God. He took upon Himself human nature, and was tempted in all points as human nature is tempted. He could have sinned; He could have fallen, but not for one moment was there in Him an evil propensity. He was assailed with temptations in the wilderness, as Adam was assailed with temptations in Eden. {13MR 18.1}

    • @S.D.P
      @S.D.P  6 месяцев назад

      This presentation here should be very helpful on the thoughts you have shared.
      ruclips.net/video/5WFqyADl-w0/видео.html
      Blessings
      VB

  • @boblackey1
    @boblackey1 24 дня назад

    Obiviously Questions On Doctrine is correct. Jesus was tempted in all things just as everyone EXCEPT without sin. Also ALL have sinned and fall short.
    But Jesus knew no sin and is separate from sinners.
    Humanity will always submit to temptation to sin when you are old enough to be genuinely tempted.
    Apparently this nice men are teaching a man can be holy by never breaking the law. And if you have broken the law, you can be retored to harmony with God by deciding to keep the law for the rest of your mortal life.
    Jesus is clearly different from the rest of us. Born of a virgin, knew NO sin, seprate from sinners and that HOLY ONE!!
    Questions On Doctrine is CORRECT and it's a shame this balanced book is and has been attacked from within of all places!

  • @Mike65809
    @Mike65809 6 месяцев назад

    Scripture does not present our Lord with two natures. The Father did his miracles through Jesus. That was what Jesus said. In fact, he could not glorify himself with his own miraculous attributes. But he was deity always in his identity as the Logos made into a man. Amen? Chalcedon gave us a Jesus who did not know the time of his return in his human nature only! That is Nestorian.

  • @KarlsKronicles
    @KarlsKronicles Год назад +1

    Almost 20 minutes in and your whole premise is flawed. Not based on solid biblical evidence.
    As much as Jesus was human, and fully human, Divine inspiration still says that in Christ, "the Godhead was not made human, and the human was not deified by the blending together of the two natures. Christ did not possess the same sinful, corrupt,
    fallen disloyalty we possess, for then He could not be a perfect offering." (RH, April 25, 1893).
    Again, "Do not set Him before the people as a man with the propensities of sin. He is the second Adam. The first Adam was crated a pure, sinless being, without a taint of sin upon him; he was in the image of God. He could fall, and he did fall through transgressing. Because of sin, his posterity was born with the inherent propensities of disobedience. But Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God. He took upon Himself human nature, and was tempted in all points as human nature is tempted. He could have sinned; He could have fallen, but not for one moment was there in Him an evil propensity." Baker Letter, see beginning paragraph.
    We are born sinners with the propensity to sin and not obey God. Jesus was not. It's that very difference that qualifies Him as our savior. This false idea that Jesus has to be like us in every point including our brokenness is heretical. With all the good work of EJ Waggoner, he was the first to put into print that Jesus had the propensity to sin. Signs of the Times, January 1889.
    And right after Waggoner, we see Jones preaching the same thing. This is the first time one can tie propensity to sin to the nature of Christ. It won't appear in Bible Readings until the end of 1915, after Ellen White has died and removed in 1949 nearly 35 years later.

    • @barryford1482
      @barryford1482 Год назад

      I think the concept is Original Sin that Jesus was free of

  • @mealone5789
    @mealone5789 2 года назад

    Vasko I think your wife just destroyed your ministry, by speaking public as a priest. Sorry to say.