Mediation and Moderation Analysis using SPSS (Hayes’s Process Macro) Part 2 (Lesson 11)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- This video explains: Mediation and Moderation Analysis using SPSS (Hayes’s Process Macro)
Mediation Analysis in SPSS
Moderation Analysis in SPSS
How to use Process Macro by Hayes SPSS
Moderation and Mediation interpretation in SPSS
All confusions related to mediation and moderators are now clear.. Great work.
Good to know that.
Sir, your videos were very helpful. I am grateful for that. I wish I found you earlier, because I struggled a long time with SPSS and data analysis for my thesis and there were no clear explanations like yours. Thanks!
Happy to help
Thank You Sir for your efforts to make the subject very clear. Best Regards.
Thanks and welcome
thankyou so much sir.. I am glad I found this video on mediation analysis now my all doubts are clear related to this PROCESS macro. now I can run and also interpret the results. Great work!!
You're most welcome
Best explanation of mediation and moderation , good job
Thank You
very clear presention. Hope Dr Atif Bilal will teaching how to conduct Model 2 or more complex models and intepret the results.
BTW: can I use Model 2 , the two moderators , to compare the effect of moderating role?
Thank You. You can only use model 2 if you want to test the effect of two moderators at the same time.
Otherwise, use model one with each moderator
Thanks, Dr. I just installed the file
Great
Great information
Thank You.
How would you report the significance in the result section during write up? Is it just that ''the values were between zero, therefore there was a significant effect''
You just need to report LLCI and ULCI, if need be you can say that the range of LLCI and ULCI does not contain zero.
You can see the table 4 of this paper in which I have used mediation.
imsciences.edu.pk/files/journals/March_2019/New%207%20MA-521.pdf
Hello Sir!
Sir I am getting values perfect in mediation analysis my values are significant in Total Effect and Direct Effect but Sir In Indirect Effect my BootLLCI values is -VE and BootULCI +VE it means values my mediation anlaysis is not perfect..??? And I am also getting Values -VE in Interaction_1 in Moderating Analysis but in Conditional Effect of X On Y Table my Values perfect significant and positive...So sir what Should I do?
Kindly Guide Me.
I hope it got resolved.
Sir thank you for this insightful video. Please clarify one question, if I have 1 moderator, 1 DV and 2 IV, according to my objective I’m testing whether my moderator moderates the relationship that DV has with 2 IVs together. How should I go about this? What model do I use? Kindly guide.
You need to run model 1 two times with each IV.
Thank you for clarifying my doubts Sir. Good teachers are a blessing 😇🙏🏼
Hi, Thank u for the explanation.
I would appreciate if u can answer my question. LLCI and ULCI having different signs (+/-). So which means they are insignificant. Question is, does it mean that there is not direct effect between them or they don't effect each other?
yes, if the values of LLCI AND ULCI carry different signs, the path is insignificant, which means no relation.
what you said is right.
what about its next part? serial mediation? their hypotheses development and testing through it? to be more specific model 81.. tx in advance for your anticipation in this regard..
ruclips.net/video/rrDMv-kXoLQ/видео.html
her is the video for sequential mediation analysis.
Sir, my Question is , my model is having 3 independents variables which model shoould i use?
If u mean u have one mediator, with three independent variables then use model 3 time by changing IV
Thanks for the explanation sir, I wanna know the method for moderation analysis when we have 2 IVs.
run 2 separate models for moderations
Sir which version of SPSS have you used in these videos?
This was 21.
But the largest are the same with very Minor clicks here and there.
Hi, thanks for the video. Actually my IV and DV both are categorical and M1 and M2 are continuous. How can I do the mediation analysis for such variables? I have only seen continuous DV and IVs in every mediation analysis so far.
Thank you. The first option is to go with the same data and check what happens. The second is that you can make an index or covert the unlikely data to the same scale. like 0 and 1 can be converted to Likert scale of 0 = 1 or 2, and 1 = 4 and 5.... and then do the analysis.
As p value interpret that if experiment will perform again chances to have same effects are 95%......
We check significant of mediation on the basis of class interval ( no zero in between) what it means...??
Please reply anyone know this answer
drive.google.com/file/d/1vltQsjjMvw3WxsRbokAu5ftGnB-vOg-4/view?usp=sharing
Sir, could you please help with my query, why does my sample size reduce when I use a nominal data as a moderating variable while using macro process. The same doesn’t happen when I do analysis with scale data as a moderating variable.
I think the data is automatically being reduced based on the repeat data set. You can use scale data to be on the safe side.
What happens when both the values are insignificant? so do we call it partial or full mediation?
No mediation.
We check mediation through class interval....which I can understand but .....why class interval...??
Hi, how to report non-significant moderation effect in discussion? what components should be included?
just discuss that results are not as expected and you can also come up with some contextual reasons.
For how to write discussion you can watch
ruclips.net/video/m1ckx3RGTXg/видео.html
If we have multiple IV, can we use process macro?
You need to use it with each independent variable separately
Hi sir I hope you are enjoying good health. Sir I have 3 IV , 6 Mediators and 2 DV. What should I do?
sorry for the late reply. use each IV with all mediators with one DV ... and then repeat the same with second DV.
Sir please tell me how we control the effect of demographic variable during corelation and mediation,moderation analysis,
Sir in my mediation analysis the value of total effect and indirect effect i.e LLCI and ULCI are negative,but in direct effect LLCI negative and ULCI positive ,it means my mediation analysis is not perfect.And I'm getting negative value in intraction_1 in moderation,
So sir what should I do
I am not sure if my reply is helpful now, but negative or positive, both can be interpreted as negative or positive effect,.
How to do with multiple independent variables
Answered in your other comment
All are explained only with one independent. Practically many independent. But process macro no such facility. How we do
Apply the model for each independent variable separately
hi, may i ask if i have 2 varibel moderation and i'm using hayes's Process Macro version 4.0. which model should i use for the moderation?
thank you
First you need to understand what hypotheses have you developed. One option is that you have made two different hypotheses with each moderator. if that is the case then you will run model 1 two times.
Dr. Thanks for the explanation. please I tried downloading the process link but couldn't, it says error reading dialogue
go to this link www.processmacro.org/download.html
and scroll down to download it.
where is the link hayes's processs macro
The latest version of hayes process macro v4 donot show z value. Then how to do sobel test?
Mediation can be checked without it.
Please make a video on parallel mediation
Soon
Sir where to add control variables in the analyze window of Andrew-Hayes Process? Pls guide. I work in financial data and I have got control variables in study
You cannot use control variable in Hayes's process. Just check the mediations/moderations without the control variables.
@@TheConceptsbyDrAtifBilal thank you for the reply
kindly also guide us about apa 7 style table and reporting of the mediation table.
thanks in advance
ruclips.net/video/Iu6p7P2JJsI/видео.html
Sir, what if i have several independent variables, one mediator and one dependent variable? How should i do it?
use model 4 with each independent variable by keeping the same mediator and dependent variable
@@TheConceptsbyDrAtifBilal Dont we have the option of performing it at once taking all the variables together? Like my model is same as Model 10
Sir, shall we use model 9 , for 2 mediators and 2 moderators without step by step.
It depends on your hypotheses. I think you should use model 4 and 1 for mediation and moderation respectively. Use these separately for each hypothesis.
Thanks a lot sir.
What does the "t " value show here?
Significance of relationship
please made a lecture on Sobel test.
sorry for the late reply. I will cover it soon
Hi, can anyone give me a visual example of how to transform a moderation output (Process, Model 1) into an APA 7th table? I don't find anything online.
ruclips.net/video/Iu6p7P2JJsI/видео.html
Wonderful explanation.
Sir can you please tell what is the minimum sample size required for Hayes process macro test.
The required to test your hypothesis is fine. depends on population.
This might explain
ruclips.net/video/4_c-d2miO4Y/видео.html
Sir the software cannot be downloaded.
try again/
Sir can you plz share link for downloading process macro for spas. Thank you in advance
Just type macronprocess download on Google. It will take you there.
Where is the link?
If you are looking for the process macro link.... This is how you can find it
ruclips.net/video/vzWWLH3lsUo/видео.htmlsi=_0RHh-NMBn3wDGtC
I need link of process analysis
to download process macro use this.... processmacro.org/download.html
scroll down to see download button.
Sir plz share the link from where we can download it..
drive.google.com/file/d/1vltQsjjMvw3WxsRbokAu5ftGnB-vOg-4/view?usp=sharing
You can download from this link
First part ??
ruclips.net/video/EMeOQX1unkQ/видео.html
Where is the link ser
www.processmacro.org/index.html
Sir plz explan mode 5
Soon
If we have multiple IV, can we use process macro?
You need to use the model separately for each I
IV
Sir the software cannot be downloaded.
try again.
Where is the link?
www.processmacro.org/index.html