Idk the situation but the fact that he left out every detail between them noticing him and him being dead makes me think he did something he shouldn't have and he doesn't want peiple to realize his story is a criminal being killed by cops
@TDM.0fficial first of all its not personal info I'm not asking for his blood type I'm asked what happened during the interaction between him and yhe cops as I highly doubt they gunned him down while driving by its also not illegal to talk about a closed case anyone who knows where this took place could submit a public records request and get the whole thing no problem
@@donttouchmysoda7551 Getting shot by a cop doesn't make you a criminal, it means you were shot by a cop. Their bullets aren't magic no matter how hard you gargle their balls.
Was pulled over by a YELLOW DODGE RAM. With lights. I didnt stop till a marked car pulled next to me. After i called 911 so i stop. Cop in the truck walks up starts screaming ... (marked cop behind him) i say yelling!! Your in a yellow ass dodge ram truck why the fuck would i even attempt to stop for you. !?!?!? Yellow guy. Shut up. Up and then looked back at the truck.. the other cop (marked) even said yah if i was him (me) i would of called 911 and never of stopped. Turns out the yellow cop hopped in his personal truck instead of his suv. And didnt realize it for 3 hours
The cops were driving around with a rifle ready to shoot, which suggests they were looking to make trouble for a quota. They claimed they had the rifle ready instead because they had just made an arrest. However they didn’t which means their narrative was false. The lawyer was able to make his case that the cops killed his client because they were pre disposed to shoot him.
Looking for a crime. Doesn't mean you get to use the "they looked suspicious" like they've been letting traffic cops get away with to pull a driver over when they have no legitimate excuse for a traffic stop. Looking for a crime means, being lucky enough to see. A robbery in progress through the window of a store while driving by, see a speed car cross your path while driving, hear a civilian holler stop thief or help that person just robbed me. Not incite a conflict with a civilian on suspicion for an arrest. Why? Like in this case, innocent people tend to get angry when their Rights are being violated and egotistical LEO's get aggressive when anyone questions their authoritarian behavior which usually escalates the situation which resulted in an innocent American losing their life. Because of you aggressiveness and your aggressive directive that evening "driving around looking for crime.". Why were tactical officers(SWAT) on patrol? They shouldn't have stopped anyone unless 100% there was a crime in progress. If they were suspicious of a crime about to happen, they should've radioed dispatch to send a unit to that area. They could've stayed and observed until the patrol-unit arrived or crime was in progress. They're a tactical officer their contact procedures are more aggressive and their "green-light" is sensitive, that's why they have a team leader in their ear(Radio) controlling their "green-light" and every move they make while on duty. Like an attack dog on a leash. You let them off their leash and someone's going to get bit until that officer pulls them off and puts them back on the leash. Those officers murdered that innocent American.
Best comment, @@onetimer44. These videos are evidence of nothing if all you have is a narrative of events and not even one person from those events in the videos.
This Yellow SUV Stop Sounds like a Good Sales Ad Pitch for P.A.V.'s (Personal Armored Vehicles) at BR6 & BR7 Ballestic Protection Levels 😅 the Citizen wouldn't have to Fear having his Windows Baton Shattered and he could Safely Converse thru his P.A.V.'s PA System and Announce.."Cool Hand" Now Whst We Have Here's a Failure to Communicate...Calm-Down 😂
@@Seaker35 I get what u mean but what is a tactical squad with rifles in an unmarked car doing that for, if it was just a cop whatever but they out creating problems like they did in the 80’s
Yep, but they have qualified immunity plus a quota and incentive structure to invent reasons for tickets. Then tack on "resisting arrest" just for fun.
I like how he didn't say that his victim here had felony warrants and they were jump out boys who specifically ride around known areas one the run dangerous felons hang out in to intercept them. Sounds like the boys in blue did an outstanding job.
Sounds like a gang.
Sounds like we all have some very uncomfortable decisions to make
Sounds like no information was given, just speculation. I want to know who the guy was and the specifics of their arrests
America lol What a shit show!
And biden goes after trump? Funny how the justice system works
You're so right.We should defend the police so they don't cause more problems And save us money Isn't that what the government wants
The Tac Units don't work like that
Those were jumpout boys
Bullshit
Idk the situation but the fact that he left out every detail between them noticing him and him being dead makes me think he did something he shouldn't have and he doesn't want peiple to realize his story is a criminal being killed by cops
Uhh he’s a lawyer why would you disclosed personal information like that? When it’s illegal to do so.
@TDM.0fficial first of all its not personal info I'm not asking for his blood type I'm asked what happened during the interaction between him and yhe cops as I highly doubt they gunned him down while driving by its also not illegal to talk about a closed case anyone who knows where this took place could submit a public records request and get the whole thing no problem
"He doesn't want people to REALIZE some shit I just thought up" is weak shit.
@Treffaut cops killed somebody usually they kill criminals this man claims other wise but won't say what happened that caused his death that's sus 🤣
@@donttouchmysoda7551 Getting shot by a cop doesn't make you a criminal, it means you were shot by a cop. Their bullets aren't magic no matter how hard you gargle their balls.
Thats murder!
Based on what?
Was pulled over by a YELLOW DODGE RAM. With lights. I didnt stop till a marked car pulled next to me. After i called 911 so i stop. Cop in the truck walks up starts screaming ... (marked cop behind him) i say yelling!! Your in a yellow ass dodge ram truck why the fuck would i even attempt to stop for you. !?!?!? Yellow guy. Shut up. Up and then looked back at the truck.. the other cop (marked) even said yah if i was him (me) i would of called 911 and never of stopped. Turns out the yellow cop hopped in his personal truck instead of his suv. And didnt realize it for 3 hours
Talking in circles. Did they shoot him for no reason or what??
The cops were driving around with a rifle ready to shoot, which suggests they were looking to make trouble for a quota.
They claimed they had the rifle ready instead because they had just made an arrest.
However they didn’t which means their narrative was false.
The lawyer was able to make his case that the cops killed his client because they were pre disposed to shoot him.
With as much that was said, all I got out of it was, that he is defending a person with a race card. Keep the narrative going. 😂
I'd be careful about anyone giving information when they are an " advocate" or activist. I've personally watched them lie many times.
😢😢😮😮😮😢😮😢😢😢😢😢
Looking for a crime. Doesn't mean you get to use the "they looked suspicious" like they've been letting traffic cops get away with to pull a driver over when they have no legitimate excuse for a traffic stop.
Looking for a crime means, being lucky enough to see. A robbery in progress through the window of a store while driving by, see a speed car cross your path while driving, hear a civilian holler stop thief or help that person just robbed me. Not incite a conflict with a civilian on suspicion for an arrest. Why? Like in this case, innocent people tend to get angry when their Rights are being violated and egotistical LEO's get aggressive when anyone questions their authoritarian behavior which usually escalates the situation which resulted in an innocent American losing their life. Because of you aggressiveness and your aggressive directive that evening "driving around looking for crime.". Why were tactical officers(SWAT) on patrol? They shouldn't have stopped anyone unless 100% there was a crime in progress. If they were suspicious of a crime about to happen, they should've radioed dispatch to send a unit to that area. They could've stayed and observed until the patrol-unit arrived or crime was in progress. They're a tactical officer their contact procedures are more aggressive and their "green-light" is sensitive, that's why they have a team leader in their ear(Radio) controlling their "green-light" and every move they make while on duty. Like an attack dog on a leash. You let them off their leash and someone's going to get bit until that officer pulls them off and puts them back on the leash. Those officers murdered that innocent American.
Do you even know what happened here after watching this video?
Best comment, @@onetimer44. These videos are evidence of nothing if all you have is a narrative of events and not even one person from those events in the videos.
It won't let me like this.
Would that not b an activity report from dispatch?
This Yellow SUV Stop Sounds like a Good Sales Ad Pitch for P.A.V.'s (Personal Armored Vehicles) at BR6 & BR7 Ballestic Protection Levels 😅 the Citizen wouldn't have to Fear having his Windows Baton Shattered and he could Safely Converse thru his P.A.V.'s PA System and Announce.."Cool Hand" Now Whst We Have Here's a Failure to Communicate...Calm-Down 😂
And so..... the cops just drive around to "find crime?" If that is true. Then this was premeditated murder. And should be tried as such.
Patrol is a crime now ? If you go to the store to look for an item is that theft ?
@@Seaker35 I get what u mean but what is a tactical squad with rifles in an unmarked car doing that for, if it was just a cop whatever but they out creating problems like they did in the 80’s
Yep, but they have qualified immunity plus a quota and incentive structure to invent reasons for tickets. Then tack on "resisting arrest" just for fun.
I grew up in Brooklyn NY in the eighties and nineties the cops would do this looking for drugs they were called TNT and were notoriously bad cops.
@@TcoTemp there had to been more to the story the cops cant just start shooting randomly
Let me guess, there was a warrant out for his arrest and he shot at the cops.
"What was she wearing?"
Same energy.
I like how he didn't say that his victim here had felony warrants and they were jump out boys who specifically ride around known areas one the run dangerous felons hang out in to intercept them. Sounds like the boys in blue did an outstanding job.
Black in Chicago we already know the guy was guilty
That's an Un-American way of going about life bro
Proof?