Battletech: Inner Sphere Battle Armor Platoon Unboxing & Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024

Комментарии • 92

  • @TsugeSenpai
    @TsugeSenpai Месяц назад +1

    Loved playing against the SLDF boys, they look fantastic. Lucky dude whoever wins them!

  • @dbul2542
    @dbul2542 Месяц назад +6

    I can vouch for the Death Ray Designs infantry. They look good and having them on the supports to start helps with painting, I also like how they slot into their bases. They also helped me win a control points game, so they have a special place in my heart for that reason.

    • @rburt3
      @rburt3 Месяц назад

      @@dbul2542 agreed. DRD infantry is my current gold standard.

  • @JERRYR708
    @JERRYR708 Месяц назад +4

    I picked up a couple DRD infantry from Fortress miniatures and very happy with the scale, detail, quality and bases. The SRM packs are always sold out. I order everything from Fortress and very happy with my experience with every order.

  • @edwardclay7551
    @edwardclay7551 Месяц назад +2

    This is why I will be sticking with the Iron Wind Metals Battle Armour.

  • @jameshojnowski8455
    @jameshojnowski8455 Месяц назад +2

    Glad i passed on these. My buddy got a pack though that I'll paint for him eventually I hope I can make them look a smidge better,

  • @warlok363
    @warlok363 Месяц назад +4

    Those Battlefield Asset rules are in the Mercenaries box set. New to that.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      @@warlok363 makes sense, I don’t have that box yet. When I do I’ll be able to address that and mention it :)

  • @rburt3
    @rburt3 Месяц назад +2

    Thank you for the detailed look. Still waiting on address lock so hoping against hope later runs are better. Not holding any breaths though.

  • @teejay91b
    @teejay91b Месяц назад +5

    There have been reports from backers that have gotten their shipments that the IS BA were all over the place as far as quality. I’ve got one box coming with my pledge but I don’t see buying another box. I just wish we had official AS cards for Elementals. I know about MUL but I prefer the cards.

    • @molenat9973
      @molenat9973 Месяц назад +2

      I’m very glad I got the box of elementals. Especially when I saw some IS units have more then 4. I cut some of them off the bases and now I have 1 base of 4, 3 bases of 5, and 1 base of 6. Some of them are jumping to represent what they can do on the card, and some are all on the ground, for the same reason

  • @kbPY13738
    @kbPY13738 Месяц назад +3

    Have been very pleased with the models from the current KS. I didn't order any IS battle armor and so far can't say I'm disappointed that I passed on them.

  • @ThrawnsHand
    @ThrawnsHand Месяц назад +2

    Your painted miniatures would really be a prize . I’ve always been envious of your skill

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +2

      It sounds cliche but anything I can do you can do. I promise. It just looks fancy on the computer screen :) I’ve got a tutorial going up at the end of the month that I think is really solid, fingers crossed it’s helpful.

    • @ThrawnsHand
      @ThrawnsHand Месяц назад +1

      @@Thearmedpainter some people can paint and others are artists. You fall into the latter category. Yes anyone can learn to paint but you have real talent

  • @madcat3525
    @madcat3525 Месяц назад +1

    Great Presentation! I got one too. Not the greatest. Looking forward to more videos.

  • @Deusorum
    @Deusorum Месяц назад +1

    Very good, in-depth review -- it is appreciated. I hope I win the "quality lottery" on the ones coming my way from the KS, because I really don't want three boxes of blob people!

  • @valteren
    @valteren Месяц назад +1

    Yeah I would probably 3d print proxies for these guys.

  • @goldskullfire
    @goldskullfire Месяц назад +1

    Its cool that we have battle armor alpha strike card. Even if there a bit of a derp.

  • @Khealos
    @Khealos Месяц назад +3

    This was probably the only box that I was NOT interested in from the Mercenaries Kickstarter. And if it retails for $30.00 - I'll stick with the 3D prints that I have, or use other sources, for the inner sphere battle armor. Thanks for the unboxing and looking forward to more.

    • @molenat9973
      @molenat9973 Месяц назад +1

      The fact that later IS units have MORE than 4 to a squad (some have up to 6 troopers per squad/base). Went with the elementals box and I’m glad I did

    • @Khealos
      @Khealos Месяц назад

      @@molenat9973This is true - but by the same token, you DON'T have to g WYSIWYG, especially for infantry and Battle Armor. I do NOT want to paint up a full platoon of like 20 guys ;). The 3D printed folks I have are broken up into 5 bases with 4 guys each.
      Cheers

  • @Joshuathegreatest7
    @Joshuathegreatest7 Месяц назад +1

    Loving the styles of this design! I still love any time that just let you have little dudes with huge units. Like that platoon is quite brave XD

  • @maxgaj3015
    @maxgaj3015 Месяц назад +2

    I've bought most of the units in the Death Ray Designs infantry range and they're all great, very high quality prints.

  • @sstinger0137
    @sstinger0137 Месяц назад +3

    I've been told that after a toothbrush with dish soap they look better. I'd like to see a side by side with the elementals after a zenithal prime.

  • @rudyvalle9022
    @rudyvalle9022 Месяц назад +1

    I found the rules for battlefield support are in the Mercenaries box.

  • @kjamma4
    @kjamma4 Месяц назад +1

    Agree with you completely about the price. The packaging weighs four times more than the product. Discarding the packaging does more damage to the environment than a Battlemech would. :(

  • @matthewbro3
    @matthewbro3 Месяц назад +1

    I did the math, seems like you can get a comparable amount of Inner Sphere Standard battle armor from Iron Wind Metals for roughly half the price. Even if CGL sorts out the quality control issues, I still think IWM would be the better buy, which isn't really the case for the Elementals. Also, IWM has minis for more specialized battle armor designs.

  • @DrBanzai
    @DrBanzai Месяц назад +1

    Hey! You and me, lucky 12 and 13! 🤣

  • @karlwahlund8459
    @karlwahlund8459 Месяц назад +1

    Only got into Battletech recently so I didn't get to participate in the kickstarter, I hope they release it for retail soon

  • @mikefenton5961
    @mikefenton5961 Месяц назад +6

    Man, I've loved most of CGL's sculpts and products. This is a major bust. I think it was Scroggins who said he thought the infantry minis should be slightly larger and while the elementals came out pretty good, anything smaller hits the limits of what Liya can produce.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +4

      I would agree. And since the minis are abstract the infantry being a smidge larger would have been perfectly fine.

  • @corrinald2971
    @corrinald2971 Месяц назад +1

    Thats a bummer that plastic isnt kind to them. I was looking forward to these. Hopefully Iron Wind Metals will produce them too, because the new CGL design for these looks great

  • @ChristopherFryeWA
    @ChristopherFryeWA Месяц назад

    A couple corrections; You don't get the final STL files. We modify every file from the client for manufacturing. These are injected molded and we could do more details but this would have do parts. And 3D will always look better however you'd have to be able to print 200k copies.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      GW was able to make solid looking models at a similar scale for their most recent version of Epic so clearly it’s possible 🤷‍♂️
      The ISBA being similar in size and shape to the elementals but looking worse in quality while costing more MSRP wise is simply baffling.
      As for 3d prints. DRD produces similar 3rd party minis at less than half the price for better quality. We can says “you’d have to be able to make 200k copies” but if a contract was offered they’d likely look into the feasibility of expanding production and meeting the demand if it was deemed to be profitable.
      Unfortunately the bottom line is we paid more for this product than the previous one and for a lower quality. If we want to claim inflation and production costs, ok, but the quality also suffered. The elementals were also more complex sculpts with the jump jets, looked better and came in cheaper for the consumer.

  • @kyubimage9526
    @kyubimage9526 18 дней назад +1

    I think I'm gonna be fine playing them using the cardoard tokens in mercenaries, hopefully the 8 base box with the grenadiers and kanazuchis is a better value.

  • @timunderbakke8756
    @timunderbakke8756 Месяц назад +1

    I’m definitely planning on giving Iron Wind some of my money instead of picking these up (I had not backed the KS so I’m picking up the packs I want as they come available)

  • @TheRendar
    @TheRendar Месяц назад +1

    Another awesome unboxing! Can’t wait to get these myself. Keep up the great work on the channel 🤙🏻 excited for the next episode.

  • @KeithCrowe
    @KeithCrowe Месяц назад

    Thanks for the review. I didn't add this box to my KS pledge because I have so many DRD Battle Armor sets. I'm glad I didnt get this box because of the quality issues, but the cards might have made it worth it.

  • @sebastiang.5032
    @sebastiang.5032 Месяц назад +1

    The DRD Battle Armors are great. I have several of them. Details are crisp and they are fun to paint. Super disappointed with the CGL IS BAs.

  • @TikTokBattleTech
    @TikTokBattleTech Месяц назад +1

    Everything else pretty much came out great on the KS. I'm not sure what happened on those battle armor units except perhaps some inferno rounds melted them on the battlefield if you want to be thematic about it.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      I’ve heard some of the mechs have had issues but I’ll hold judgement until I see them. Aside from the obvious mold lines and such the previous mechs have mostly been solid so hoping that’s the case for the rest of the KS too.

  • @gstillings5140
    @gstillings5140 Месяц назад +1

    I have heard a few people mention quality issues with the IS battle armor. Everything else seems to be pretty solid from what I have seen.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      I suspect the non BA stuff will be solid for the most part. This is the first time I’ve gotten a CGL kit that I felt was sub par especially for the price point.

  • @wmarples
    @wmarples Месяц назад +1

    I'm glad I didn't include this as one of my KS picks. I may grab one box from Fortress once they have them, but I'm not even sure about that.

  • @jgnunan
    @jgnunan Месяц назад +3

    Hi Big J... I learn something with your videos and enjoy myself... Although sometime I set the playback to 0.75... you must rock some caffeine as you speak quite fast (said the boomer)

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      @@jgnunan yeaaah….I don’t wanna disclose hope much caffeine I consume lol!

  • @brians4016
    @brians4016 Месяц назад +1

    I didn’t order any IS BA with my kickstarter, as I rarely run BA, but this is disappointing.
    That being said, I did receive my KS pledge, and an say the ‘Mechs and combat vees are great! Outside some slightly bent barrels and arms (easily fixed by warming up), the ‘Mechs are fantastic - seems they keep improving the casting with each wave. There are the usual spots where parts were cut from the sprue, but I had to hunt - and use my magnifying light on my painting desk - to find mold lines.
    The Vees were likewise great sculpts, and the way they have the turrets attached is brilliant! On some, even the little MG turrets can rotate!

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      I got my address verification email I think over two weeks ago. No shipping update though :/

    • @brians4016
      @brians4016 Месяц назад

      @@ThearmedpainterLooking at my emails, I got the address verification email July 12th, and shipping notification on the 23rd, so close to two weeks apart.

  • @PheonixRises2040
    @PheonixRises2040 Месяц назад +3

    $30 for battle armor? I think 19.99 would be a better price point for what you’re getting.

  • @youtmeme
    @youtmeme Месяц назад +1

    I didnt add them to my kick bc they looked pretty bad from the days of the kick. Looked muddy back then, at least it was not false advertising! I just don't know whay cgl was thinking that they were ready for sale the way they are!!🧐🤔🤨

  • @speeddemonpainting7050
    @speeddemonpainting7050 Месяц назад +4

    Infantry and BA are beyond what PVC plastic should/can do.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +2

      Games Workshop has some amazing infantry at a similar scale. But they have better quality minis in general and use a different material. But at $30 bucks for these infantry I feel like there isn’t a good excuse for CGL.

  • @BlUsKrEEm
    @BlUsKrEEm Месяц назад +1

    That's a shame. I do love running Battlearmor, but it's the one place that Iron Winds isn't all that great. The Elemental suits are pretty good.
    DRD'S Sikverback Suits are quality pieces. I used them for Tin Stars before we had official art for them. Turns out they aren't bad for them.

  • @lord17c
    @lord17c Месяц назад

    I will say the DRD elementals, silver backs I think they are called, are amazing as are all the stuff they put out. That price point on those 4 stands is silly.

  • @vailkor
    @vailkor Месяц назад +1

    Im very interested in ordering some proxies instead of those. I don't intend on playing in official events so I don't feel like I need the official catalyst models when they're this underwhelming.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      We sell SO many of our infantry to BT players as it is ;) you won’t go wrong with some drd minis.

  • @Metal_Carnage
    @Metal_Carnage Месяц назад +1

    Ironwind has a sprue of 3 for 2.60. each figure on the sprue has a different weapon (MG,Laser, or Flamer). 4 sprues with a pack of bases will run you 15.30. With a little bit of work, you can have 3 different stands of IS BA for half the price.
    in comparison to other infantry lines from sci fi mini companies, Catalyst's BA seems small. I guess it's so the individual figures don't crowd the stand.

  • @richardrussell7082
    @richardrussell7082 Месяц назад +1

    Funny how they can get them shipped to retailers to make more sales quicker than to pledgers who've already paid 🤔
    And that price tag is obscene

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      The seller in question was forced to shift these to pre order but it definitely tips the hand of CGL letting the backers and customers know at least some retailers out there got product before we did which is annoying.

  • @ninneplug
    @ninneplug Месяц назад +3

    I hope the 'mechs and other vehicles look better then, I'll be pretty disappointed if the quality takes a similar hit.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +2

      @@ninneplug I have no doubt the quality of the bigger stuff is solid. The preview hover craft I have is night and day vs this.

  • @ErgonomicChair
    @ErgonomicChair Месяц назад +1

    Plastic Injection SHOULD be superior to 3D printed hands down...

  • @NegTharayas16
    @NegTharayas16 Месяц назад +1

    Yeah, with Silverbacks coming in at 25 stands... that a demi-company of battlearmor at half the price of a platoon from CHL. And Silverbacks look better to boot. I use Elementals as themselves and silverbacks for IS BA.
    2 silverbacks gives you a company for $32... 3x the units, better details, for the same price.

  • @verysilentmouse
    @verysilentmouse Месяц назад

    The rules for battlefield support are in the merc box

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      Haven’t got that box on hand yet, I’ll mention that when I open it up.

  • @djrhatcha
    @djrhatcha Месяц назад +2

    I didn’t hate them honestly. For figures of that size not printed, I expected them to look like this. If they made them just a bit larger, they would've come out much better

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +3

      I think the issue is they are similar in size to the previous armor they released and not the same quality while being expensive for what they are.

  • @donlovejoy1805
    @donlovejoy1805 Месяц назад +3

    Well, at least I'll have official cards when I proxy the models.

  • @rankovich09
    @rankovich09 Месяц назад +1

    A shame. I chose a box of these BA and will see if I can trade them around piecemeal.

  • @Zathul4198
    @Zathul4198 Месяц назад +1

    I just replied to your post on Reddit with a picture of mine. Everything else in my haul was great, but these looked so bad they essentially look like wet blobs with no detail. It’s really disappointing

  • @jjonestown
    @jjonestown Месяц назад +1

    CGL is single handedly the greatest thing to happen to battletech since FASA died but man do they make some mistakes

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      I’d argue that Scroggins is probably a bigger factor. If not for the influx of all these new 3D designs from he and his team I think BT would still be struggling :/

    • @jjonestown
      @jjonestown Месяц назад

      @@Thearmedpainter holy shit i didn’t even know who this guy was but yeah this beautiful art was definitely a factor for getting me to join the game

  • @BrotherKarr22
    @BrotherKarr22 Месяц назад +2

    Yeah I did not add these to the kickstarter when I could. They just are not the best! Honestly I was not happy with the elementals either and I painted 25 bases of them. Ugh! I picked up some 3d printed elementals at a larger size and plan on redoing the elementals with those.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      @@BrotherKarr22 I didn’t kind the elementals personally, though I didn’t paint them as detailed as I do mechs (too small for me) but I certainly feel their details relative to the ISBA here are more crisp.

  • @DDVargas1983
    @DDVargas1983 Месяц назад +1

    I got a box for my KS rewards. Looking like I'm going to just have to paint them a generic camo pattern so I can use it with as many forces as I can so I don't have to get a second box.

  • @frankb3347
    @frankb3347 Месяц назад +1

    Well that's disappointing. Not only are these underwhelming but that's going to negatively effect all future Battle Armor sales. As for the price that should cost half as much as a Mech Lance box imo.

  • @dubuyajay9964
    @dubuyajay9964 Месяц назад +2

    Any idea if they plan to do plain and jump jet infantry?

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      No idea. I wouldn’t expect a heavy expansion of infantry though. It’s not as easy to make and the quality is…not great.

    • @dubuyajay9964
      @dubuyajay9964 Месяц назад +1

      @@Thearmedpainter Nonetheless, they ARE a thing in this game.

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад +1

      @@dubuyajay9964 totally agree. My concern would be their ability as a company to get good quality infantry at this scale with the production facilities they have chosen. GW has managed to do it in hard plastic, but they cost more. I’m not sure CGL is willing to invest in better material/quality for these. If they do however, I’d be happy to see it. The small scale stuff GW has made look great.

    • @mikefenton5961
      @mikefenton5961 Месяц назад

      Right now I doubt it, seems like for unarmed infantry CGL is going to point you to IWM.

    • @lorcannagle
      @lorcannagle Месяц назад

      Tgey've said for now they have no intention to do conventional infantry minis in plastic, but there are cardboard counters in the mercs box and Iron wind does a wide range of BattleTech infantry minis in metal.

  • @ThrawnsHand
    @ThrawnsHand Месяц назад +1

    I’m not a fan of the battle armor. I know you are more an Alpha Strike player than just Battletech. How much of an influence do they make in Alpha Strike ?

    • @Thearmedpainter
      @Thearmedpainter  Месяц назад

      So in Alpha Strike combined arms is huge. For Clanners BA helps with threat projection and burst damage. For IS that lack as main Omni mechs (most BA require this to ride them, but there are exactions) BA and combined arms are a little different. You’ll see IS use transports and flamer infantry (heat is brutal) and BA that excel at range damage vs short range attacks or melee. The Cuchulain (www.sarna.net/wiki/Cuchulainn) and Gnome Battle Armor (www.sarna.net/wiki/Gnome) are two really brutal BA to use for medium range damage. They out DPS lots of lower end mechs or cost similar points of more. You give up mobility of course but standing back and shooting is nice and lets you focus on maneuvering with your other units instead.

  • @m3rcier808
    @m3rcier808 Месяц назад +1

    $30 is a bit steep for BA……gunna pass.

  • @tobalt
    @tobalt Месяц назад +1

    A shame the details are poor.

  • @Blue_Dingo
    @Blue_Dingo Месяц назад +1

    Disappointing, and I have a box coming with my Kickstarter too.