The JAL did not have an engine failure. The engine cowling came unlocked. Completely different. The A321 was doing a test flight. Minimum unstick. It’s part of the certification process (see the orange lump at the tail to protect airframe from damage !
Yeah, although I usually like these videos , for this one the information presented is just faulty so I gave it a thumbs down. There's no need to mispresent the facts it would have been interesting without that. shame.
I'm pretty sure the maker of this video was well aware what was happening here. Really unnecessary to pretend it was an accident and not a planned test 😞
Looks like the Airbus A321 was performing a Vmu test. The tail skid is footed in place and the tailed is deliberately dragged to see a what velocity will the plane “unstick” off the runway. Hence Velocity minimum unstick Vmu.
@@Twobarpsi Ah my mistake. I assumed the flaps would need to be up for take off, so when air hits them it tilts the nose up. Apparently flaps need to be partially down during takeoff to increase the wing's curve, important for lift at low take off speeds.
Was the 321 XLR take off from TLS not a test flight? THey had the orange box on the tail whitch I believe is a sign of tail strike & take-off pitch testing?
Was obviously doing a Vmu (minimum unstick) test. Reference the tailskid installed. It was NOT "struggling to take off..." They did it on purpose to document the minimum speed at which liftoff could occur. Get your facts straight, guys.... I usually enjoy these videos, but this one was off.
@@gordonbryan8381barrel roll… ( ballistic roll), albeit a smaller diameter barrel. The longitudinal axis of the jet was not coincidental with its flight path (aileron roll).
it definitely exploded, a fan blade fractured and a uncontained engine failure occurred. " A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron. Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root."
@@Jeeve_Stobs google it yourself if you dont believe me. JAL 777, December 2020 Engine Failure. Look for the Aviation Herald link, or, avherald it literally has pictures of the engine missing 1 entire blade and 1/3 of another blade. FFS yall some idiots
@@MeppyMan yes, uncontained failure, the #16 blade fractured near the root, and impacted the #15 blade taking about 1/3 of its length, then impacted the casing and ejected. This caused the cowling pieces to explode and fly off, leaving the shredded end of the one cowling you see here in the video. Google it - JAL 777 Engine Failure, December 2020
Certainly.. Pedantic mode engaged… - Loose cowling no explosion -Not struggling, test flight -Goes inverted “then” does barrel role? The inversion is a fairly necessary component of the barrel role. -Jumps over a moving plane, meh, flying plane more specifically. - Yay, he got one right 🎉 -Minimal ground speed? Low ground speed maybe. Unless you know the stall speed for weight and configuration you cant says it’s minimal. You’re welcome!
1. The 777 engine didn't fail but the engine cowl opened during flight so they landed back. 2. A321 neo was testing tail skid manoeuvre and you can clearly see the tail skid pad installed, in orange colour.
Poor Guy in the Cessna... It started out a 45 min jump to the city to do some shopping... took 3 hours and a full tank of gas! But the tailwind home almost broke the sound barrier... LOL 🤣😂🤣 Note: love the instrument array... They've come a long way since I sat in a Cessna 152 (I know not the same craft... but you know what I mean) about 40 years ago!
they have been doing that for nearly 20 years now. B1 did a barrel roll at an airshow I was working the flight line with - during my CAP Days back in 1999. that was the first time i ever saw a B1 do a barrel roll as well.
The US Army used to put the Chinooks down into the water and allow the special forces to paddle out the back, but eventually stopped that maneuver when it was found that the water inundation to the cargo hold was causing damage
***DISCLAIMER*** F.Y.I. The video at 00:43 the aircraft is NOT struggling to climb. Is is called at "Drag Test" is designed to measure the impact on take off performance in the event of an over-rotation by the pilots a.k.a. "tail strike". You can see the bright orange tool attached to the tail cone to protect the airframe during the test.
In that Cessna Caravan clip, the clicking you hear is almost certainly the pitch trim motor control relays, being actuated by the pilot who has the switch for control of that right on the control yoke.
@@ayod00112 blades were thrown and took out the rest of the engine. That’s an explosion. Maybe not an explosion due to fuel, but an explosion never the less.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 well nevertheless even if it did explode the video’s whole title is the engine explodes and they don’t show any explosion, just an engine with a loose cowling.
@@ayod0011 wait. So you need to see the explosion or it didn’t happen? How do you describe things that happen in your past to people that didn’t witness it?
I went into MWH (Moses Lake) in a 172 I think, maybe a 28-200, but I had a really strong head wind and my rollout was like....100' at most. Tower couldn't find me as they were looking down the runway for me and I had made the first turn.
The Cessna was indicating airspeed of 80 knots reducing to 69 knots on touchdown, deduct 40 knots headwind means a landing speed as low as 29 knots (about 35 mph).
I was in my barracks at my desk a lifetime ago at Port Hueneme with headphones on and my back to the windows. Suddenly (it felt like a bomb went off) I was covered in glass and curtains and screens and dirt. I first checked to make sure I was still alive then looked out the gaping hole where the windows used to be to see a Chinook trying to lift a small tank from the grinder deck. The prop wash or whatever you want to call it took out every single window in that entire building.
the B1-B did a 4-point ailerol roll, not a barrel roll. and being inverted is by necessity a phase in any roll maneuver. and the Chinook did not drop anything - the boat was slid off the ramp (drop implied being carried by sling) and the divers jumped.
Bro I want to fly so bad! that Cessna clip looks so fun to me Nice dark cloudy day So nice No other noise in the flight deck if ur soloing Looks so nice
"A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron. Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root." Not an engine failure huh?
@@CapStar362 Engine failure correspond at internal part from The Fan to the Low pressure turbine. Accesses doors are aerodynamic parts seguradora by latches.
@@protell1433 don't believe me? Google it yourself JAL December 2020 777 Engine Failure. look for the avherald link - that is the plane in this video. Look for the pictures of the fan missing an entire blade at the root and about 1/3 of the adjacent blade. find someone else
I've always considered the B-1 to be the coolest bomber ever. A supersonic BOMBER?! Imagine being a fighter pilot and finding out a bomber with a full load out can outrun you.
Valkyrie is significantly cooler. 6 engines mach 2 below radar and room for lots of h bombs. Also much prettier. Concorde + Fighter + Bomber + nukes. Almost the range of an ICBM. 7000 km. Cruises at 70k ft.
"A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron. Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root.
the 2nd aircraft. slow to lift off......when I left for Nam Nov 71 our aircraft did the same thing, seems like we rolled for miles before the main landing gear left the ground, I think my butt hit the barb wire fence at the end of the flight line as we lifted off!
The JAL did not have an engine failure. The engine cowling came unlocked. Completely different.
The A321 was doing a test flight. Minimum unstick. It’s part of the certification process (see the orange lump at the tail to protect airframe from damage !
I was going to comment that about the A321. It's a certification test... I guess they don't check the sources of the videos or what they were doing 😅
Yeah, although I usually like these videos , for this one the information presented is just faulty so I gave it a thumbs down. There's no need to mispresent the facts it would have been interesting without that. shame.
I'm pretty sure the maker of this video was well aware what was happening here. Really unnecessary to pretend it was an accident and not a planned test 😞
Thank you very much for clarifying the events shown in the videos.
@@b1lleman But the certification test consists of rotating at low speed and struggling to lift off, which is what the description said.
That Cessna at the end was insane. It was basically stationary.
It was moving slowly 👍
Not insane at all, quite rational really.
Check out STOL competitions, some of them can take of or land in a few meters, with nearly walking speed! (STOL = Short Take-Off and Landing)
crazy, playing a retro flightsim while landing a plane in those conditions.
Gonna take off again just trying to taxi off the runway :D
The A320 XLR was just doing a demo for Aerosucre who had expressed their intention of buying one.
LOL TRUE THAT
Aerosucre after they see a “A320 XLR” do a demo for their airline: yeeeessssss thank you A320 XLR we will buy you to add to our fleet
It was a minimum un-stick test. There's a red skid under the tail, used in testing to prevent tail-drags.
That was my first thought!!
Hahaaaa!! Love those AeroSucre guys!
Looks like the Airbus A321 was performing a Vmu test. The tail skid is footed in place and the tailed is deliberately dragged to see a what velocity will the plane “unstick” off the runway. Hence Velocity minimum unstick Vmu.
True, but he won't update the title or description.
Exactly!
The wing flaps are also in a downward position, the opposite position required for take off.
@@Zerobob26 what? Flaps are always down for take off.
@@Twobarpsi Ah my mistake. I assumed the flaps would need to be up for take off, so when air hits them it tilts the nose up. Apparently flaps need to be partially down during takeoff to increase the wing's curve, important for lift at low take off speeds.
Was the 321 XLR take off from TLS not a test flight? THey had the orange box on the tail whitch I believe is a sign of tail strike & take-off pitch testing?
probably a VMU test or Tailstrike avoidance system test
@@louisjd3056 All the source videos are listed below the video , so you can go check the source videos out, and they clearly indicate it was a test.
It's in an airbus site (Toulouse in France I guess) there's AIRBUS written on a building.
It was an Aerosucre test flight, to see if it could be overloaded like their 727s.....
Was obviously doing a Vmu (minimum unstick) test. Reference the tailskid installed. It was NOT "struggling to take off..." They did it on purpose to document the minimum speed at which liftoff could occur. Get your facts straight, guys.... I usually enjoy these videos, but this one was off.
A321 pilot told his kids "Ya'll wanna see me do a wheelie?"
LMAO
Lol 😂
Old school, baby! Lol
I’m impressed that it’s actually a barrel roll and not an aileron roll.
it's called a bofa
It was just an aileron roll. A barrel roll displaces the aircraft a significant distance left or right of the original ground track.
@@gordonbryan8381 It did though, it ended up significantly displaced to the left of its original track
@@gordonbryan8381barrel roll… ( ballistic roll), albeit a smaller diameter barrel. The longitudinal axis of the jet was not coincidental with its flight path (aileron roll).
How can you tell? There is nothing in the picture frame other than blue sky; we have no frame of reference to see the actual flight path.
I don't see any sign of an engine explosion
it definitely exploded, a fan blade fractured and a uncontained engine failure occurred.
"
A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron.
Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root."
@@CapStar362uncontained failure?
Are you saying we were misled?
@@Jeeve_Stobs google it yourself if you dont believe me.
JAL 777, December 2020 Engine Failure.
Look for the Aviation Herald link, or, avherald
it literally has pictures of the engine missing 1 entire blade and 1/3 of another blade.
FFS yall some idiots
@@MeppyMan yes, uncontained failure, the #16 blade fractured near the root, and impacted the #15 blade taking about 1/3 of its length, then impacted the casing and ejected.
This caused the cowling pieces to explode and fly off, leaving the shredded end of the one cowling you see here in the video.
Google it -
JAL 777 Engine Failure, December 2020
That Caravan at the end lol. I'm just imagining the controllers tapping their feet impatiently.
Hoooly shit, that Cessna at the end was CRAZY! That's some great flying.
I didn't know the B1 Lancers could do that! Amazing!
I mean, a 707 has done one, why not?
The Bone is the XXL version of the Tomcat so, yea.
@@tolson57thicc Tomcat 😂
Goodbye hot chocolate
According to Hollywood, that B1-B Lancer avoided like 10 missiles with that maneuver.
You owe me 4 seconds of aviation.
Guido is the MAN! 🙋🏼♀️
Thank you!
@@GuidoWarnecke Keflavik?
@@GuidoWarnecke Oh hi Guido 😆 You were basically taxiing in the air haha
@@marcusianaviation9372 The taxing was quite challenging.
Alright I've got my popcorn, waiting for those comments that pick apart the titles!
And they usually come like a clockwork 🤣!
Certainly..
Pedantic mode engaged…
- Loose cowling no explosion
-Not struggling, test flight
-Goes inverted “then” does barrel role? The inversion is a fairly necessary component of the barrel role.
-Jumps over a moving plane, meh, flying plane more specifically.
- Yay, he got one right 🎉
-Minimal ground speed? Low ground speed maybe. Unless you know the stall speed for weight and configuration you cant says it’s minimal.
You’re welcome!
@@Captain101-x1o [Pedantic mode engaged]
...barrel *roll*
@@Captain101-x1oapparently the JAL incident was actually an uncontained failure from 2020.
Also the people complaining not understanding that they are helping the video succeed. Lol.
1. The 777 engine didn't fail but the engine cowl opened during flight so they landed back.
2. A321 neo was testing tail skid manoeuvre and you can clearly see the tail skid pad installed, in orange colour.
Poor Guy in the Cessna... It started out a 45 min jump to the city to do some shopping... took 3 hours and a full tank of gas! But the tailwind home almost broke the sound barrier... LOL 🤣😂🤣
Note: love the instrument array... They've come a long way since I sat in a Cessna 152 (I know not the same craft... but you know what I mean) about 40 years ago!
The Cessna was taxiing in the air 😂
Didn't know the Bone could do that. Pretty badass.
they have been doing that for nearly 20 years now.
B1 did a barrel roll at an airshow I was working the flight line with - during my CAP Days back in 1999.
that was the first time i ever saw a B1 do a barrel roll as well.
Ooh, you said Bone! Wow.
That Cessna helicopter landing at the end was cool!
You got me for a second there hahaha. Well played sir
Think that XLR was doing a tail strike test
The US Army used to put the Chinooks down into the water and allow the special forces to paddle out the back, but eventually stopped that maneuver when it was found that the water inundation to the cargo hold was causing damage
Those guys are bad ass. They like jumping into the water.
That Cessna almost vstol landing in the end was epic. Always wanted to see that scenario play out.
You owe us 4 seconds of aviation
I love a lot of jets and aircraft, but Chinooks are just really special. They just look and sound so menacing.
These videos are pretty good u gotta admit that
***DISCLAIMER*** F.Y.I. The video at 00:43 the aircraft is NOT struggling to climb. Is is called at "Drag Test" is designed to measure the impact on take off performance in the event of an over-rotation by the pilots a.k.a. "tail strike". You can see the bright orange tool attached to the tail cone to protect the airframe during the test.
as dozens have already stated
You owe us 4 seconds of aviation.
Nice panel on that Cessna
The title should be "Royal Netherlands Air Force".
That Caravan was insane.
This guy just makes it up as he goes along.
The first one: that is NOT the sight you wanna see out of your flight's window.
Yhe last one: that's some skill. 👏
That was not a Caravan, but a Stationair-y 🤣
In that Cessna Caravan clip, the clicking you hear is almost certainly the pitch trim motor control relays, being actuated by the pilot who has the switch for control of that right on the control yoke.
You owe us 5 more seconds of aviation 🥹
Exploding is so Popular now haha
I don't know what the Japanese were so worried about. That open panel look is very Star Wars!
Excellent video!
This channel needs to stop clickbaiting, the engine on that triple 7 didn't explode.
What would you call an uncontained turbine blade failure then?
@@MeppyManits literally just a broken cowling and engine failure, even in the actual video it just says engine failure
@@ayod00112 blades were thrown and took out the rest of the engine. That’s an explosion. Maybe not an explosion due to fuel, but an explosion never the less.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 well nevertheless even if it did explode the video’s whole title is the engine explodes and they don’t show any explosion, just an engine with a loose cowling.
@@ayod0011 wait. So you need to see the explosion or it didn’t happen? How do you describe things that happen in your past to people that didn’t witness it?
Still looking for the plane engine exploding…
It was an uncontained failure. So explosion is hyperbole but not an unexpected explanation someone would use.
I went into MWH (Moses Lake) in a 172 I think, maybe a 28-200, but I had a really strong head wind and my rollout was like....100' at most. Tower couldn't find me as they were looking down the runway for me and I had made the first turn.
The A321 XLR was a test flight at the Toulouse FAL.
The Caravan landing looked nearly like a helicopter landing 😁
Yep. Slowing down and stopping before landing is so much better than all this hitting the ground at speed nonsense. 🚁
0:58 Who saw a Beluga Airbus?🧐🤨 Put it to 0.25x speed...🤨
1:31 Looks like something red bull would do
The Cessna was indicating airspeed of 80 knots reducing to 69 knots on touchdown, deduct 40 knots headwind means a landing speed as low as 29 knots (about 35 mph).
That Cessna has some nice avionics; I used to fly with my uncle and his Cessna was a real "by the seat of your pants" 172 back in the "olden times".
That final landing... I didn't know there was that much BUTTER in the world!
You Got your Fighter Jet in my bomber! You got your Bomber in my Fighter Jet! (how the Lancer was created)
you owe us 4 seconds of extra aviation
I am old enough to remember when divers were called frog-men.
The rest of your excellent content reminds me of why I remain a white-knuckler flyer! 😂
Was William Shatner on that first plane?
I understood that reference! 😄
No, but John Lithgow was. Wanna see something _really_ scary?
Nice deep cut for the Twilight Zone!
Wonder how many people under the age of 50 even get that reference. "Here honey, have an aspirin and some scotch. Next time we'll take the train"
That Cessna at the end made my brain pause
2:19 Me in MSFS
I was in my barracks at my desk a lifetime ago at Port Hueneme with headphones on and my back to the windows. Suddenly (it felt like a bomb went off) I was covered in glass and curtains and screens and dirt. I first checked to make sure I was still alive then looked out the gaping hole where the windows used to be to see a Chinook trying to lift a small tank from the grinder deck. The prop wash or whatever you want to call it took out every single window in that entire building.
the B1-B did a 4-point ailerol roll, not a barrel roll. and being inverted is by necessity a phase in any roll maneuver.
and the Chinook did not drop anything - the boat was slid off the ramp (drop implied being carried by sling) and the divers jumped.
At 1:20, Denzel Washington would be proud of that pilot!
DID ANYONE NOTICE THE AIRBUS BELUGA IN THE SECOND CLIP?
Did any one else notice the beluga behind the a320?
Nice catch!
1:48 Those divers didn’t look too keen to get in the water.
The JAL engine did not explode..... one benefit of working in the aerospace industry you can get your facts straight
Bro I want to fly so bad! that Cessna clip looks so fun to me
Nice dark cloudy day
So nice
No other noise in the flight deck if ur soloing
Looks so nice
That's PW4074 of JL904 happend 2020/dec/4. 15th and 16th fan blade snapped and rest of fan blades are damaged.
40 years ago I was a Chinook mechanic. Damn I'm old.
another 3 minutes of aviation video, another incorrect title.
So many aviation videos out now, click bait is to be expected. At least it's only 3 minutes and no bad AI narration.
That A321 was just heavy in the ass that’s all 😂
Did anyone see the engine explode???
It was not an engine failure. The Fan cowl probably left at unlocked position before flight.
It was an uncontained engine failure of a PW4084 that occurred during climb at 16,000ft in December 2020.
"A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron.
Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root."
Not an engine failure huh?
@@CapStar362 Engine failure correspond at internal part from The Fan to the Low pressure turbine. Accesses doors are aerodynamic parts seguradora by latches.
@@protell1433 exactly, and this flight experienced a FBO Event.
It lost a FAN BLADE !!!!
that is a ENGINE FAILURE
@@protell1433 don't believe me? Google it yourself
JAL December 2020 777 Engine Failure.
look for the avherald link - that is the plane in this video. Look for the pictures of the fan missing an entire blade at the root and about 1/3 of the adjacent blade.
find someone else
I've always considered the B-1 to be the coolest bomber ever. A supersonic BOMBER?! Imagine being a fighter pilot and finding out a bomber with a full load out can outrun you.
B1B can barely break mach at low level, but Mach 1.25 at high level, most fighters will hit Mach 1.6 easily
Valkyrie is significantly cooler. 6 engines mach 2 below radar and room for lots of h bombs. Also much prettier. Concorde + Fighter + Bomber + nukes. Almost the range of an ICBM. 7000 km. Cruises at 70k ft.
A321 XLR was a test flight, notice the special pad to test tail strike
You owe us 4 seconds of more aviation
Shat ap
@@mindplanes Shut up*
@@hi_dx1 no shit bro
Wait a minute! Where is another 5 seconds of aviation?
It was the commercial at the beginning
Another day, another Boeing 😂 .
Another day, another genius in the comments blaming Boeing for everything and anything they can possibly get their hands on 😂
If it's Boeing, nobody's going.
Boeing is not responsible for that. Either the airline or the engine manufacturer.
this incident occurred in 2020, STFU
"A JAL Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200, registration JA8978 performing flight JL-904 from Okinawa to Tokyo Haneda (Japan) with 178 passengers and 11 crew, was climbing out of Okinawa when the left hand engine (PW4084) failed and its access doors ripped off with huge noises prompting the crew to stop the climb at FL190 and return to Okinawa for a safe landing about 35 minutes after departure. The aircraft stopped on the runway and was subsequently towed to the apron.
Japan's Ministry of Transport rated the occurrence a serious incident, Japans TSB have dispatched investigators on site and opened an investigation. The ministry reported one of the fan blades of the left hand engine was damaged at the root.
3 minutes is ideal.
That JAL is very lucky; if the cowling had smacked the elevators, things would have gone badly very fast
netherlands in the news, nice
That Cessna's impersonating a Piper Cub
clickbaited
no engines exploded
The first video appears to be a cowel fastener failure, not necessarily an engine failure.
At least the doors didn't blow off.
did you guys not see in that first clip. the engine was a huge fireball. plane almost dropped out of the sky.
1:37 I'm more impressed by the plane.
That Cessna coulda landed in my back yard.
Report this video for a grossly misleading tital. Spam/misleading this is theft of our views/time
Give some time to read captions or hold the captions while watching
Wow, alle Sympathie in 3 Sekunden zerstört. Wo „struggelt“ der A321 denn?
Last one looked like it was pulling into a McDonald's drive thru
Muito bom parabéns
i live in the netherlands and that chinooks flies very much over my house
the 2nd aircraft. slow to lift off......when I left for Nam Nov 71 our aircraft did the same thing, seems like we rolled for miles before the main landing gear left the ground, I think my butt hit the barb wire fence at the end of the flight line as we lifted off!
No explosion anywhere
Where was the engine explosion?
occurred before the video started
Guido Warnecke is a crazy good pilot
"Plane Engine Explodes"
No it doesn't.
It's weird you peddle misformation for clicks now. But then again you've never uploaded any original content.
Except the engine exploded and what you see are the results.
This man comments on a video he watched
Best Channel
You owe us 4 seconds 😢
You owe us 4 seconds
Shades of Tex Johnson!!
معرض مصر للطيران إضافة إلي العاصمة الجديدة
أو مقره في العاصمة الجديدة 🌻