No thank you sir I want the 2.5-10 with the lower price and much larger objective lense with a side focus please. It would blow the night force nsx out of the water on price. The mk5 2-10 and the Mark 4hd 2.5-10 are not the same kind of scope. The Mark 4 could be a lower power compact precision scope for shorter precision guns. The 2-10 is an odd ball in between a lvpo and small precision scope.
I agree with this. Especially when you're seeing LPVO's with 1-10x magnification. Obviously, with nowhere near the same capabilities with something with a larger Obj, but still. For some reason, Leupold is so far behind many others in the market now days. And I don't see them having any legs with the average shooter in America anymore. I don't know anyone who has purchased a Leupold optic in the last 10 years anymore. Literally no one. It's like they're suffering from the same disease Colt and Remington suffered from, and Sig currently is. I guess you could make a viable argument that Ron Cohen is the main issue with those companies though. Bottom line is that the marketplace is vastly different today than it was in the late 80's and early 90's. You can buy a really nice optic for $500 today, and you can get something premium for right around $1000 that doesn't feel like it's antiquated. And try as I might, I just can't convince myself to buy a Leupold anything anymore.
Wish they had more FDE scopes.
No side focus on the 2.5-10 is a huge let down. There still isn’t a decent MPVO scope on the market.
Hopefully stiener H6Xi 2-12x42mm in mil will be any good
No thank you sir I want the 2.5-10 with the lower price and much larger objective lense with a side focus please. It would blow the night force nsx out of the water on price.
The mk5 2-10 and the Mark 4hd 2.5-10 are not the same kind of scope. The Mark 4 could be a lower power compact precision scope for shorter precision guns. The 2-10 is an odd ball in between a lvpo and small precision scope.
I agree with this. Especially when you're seeing LPVO's with 1-10x magnification. Obviously, with nowhere near the same capabilities with something with a larger Obj, but still. For some reason, Leupold is so far behind many others in the market now days. And I don't see them having any legs with the average shooter in America anymore. I don't know anyone who has purchased a Leupold optic in the last 10 years anymore. Literally no one. It's like they're suffering from the same disease Colt and Remington suffered from, and Sig currently is. I guess you could make a viable argument that Ron Cohen is the main issue with those companies though.
Bottom line is that the marketplace is vastly different today than it was in the late 80's and early 90's. You can buy a really nice optic for $500 today, and you can get something premium for right around $1000 that doesn't feel like it's antiquated. And try as I might, I just can't convince myself to buy a Leupold anything anymore.
For a video review take the dip out..shouldn’t have to say that.