That was fun. There needs to be more Let's Plays. The pandemic made everything just so hard. I think Quinns' feathers are very nice. I don't know. 75? Is it larger than the real answer? No? Then it doesn't loose O.K., at 3 to one, you get your bet back and then three times that bet. So, 2+3- is 4. Thank goodness for Mik and Starla! Homer never had a problem getting hired. Well, not MUCH of a problem. Steven King novels? I don't know. 102? When Chat is ignored, Chat can get pretty insistent. Jorden? 23? M., S. and Q. for the big win! Emma!
Licensed games Edit A total of 704 known licensed games (715 cartridges, including compilations of previously released games) were released for the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) during its lifespan... At least if we trust in Wikipedia ;)
It balances itself out. For example look at both OFPG and Quinns scores. They only got a pay off once. I'm assuming that you can't put more than one token on it though, and probably no extra money, but who knows.
It was incredibly painful to see Quinns convince everyone that gambling payouts work in an extremely wrong way. It also meant that everyone was getting much less money and that there was no reason for people to bet on the colors.
@@MichaelNerman Yeah, when you play with actual betting rules you make money on the 1 to 1. The way they played it you just don't lose money which essentially makes them pointless spaces.
You're right. I misread the rules, and they played it wrong. The only weird thing with the rules is that you get your betting chip back even if it was on a wrong bet. I thought Quinns actually noticed the error, but didn't press it when Matt contradicted him.
it's so much more intuitive when you have physical chips, because then if you win, you take back the chips you put in, and THEN take an additional amount. when you're just tracking numbers i think it's less intuitive.
Haha yeah getting that totally wrong 🤦 you only lose the money you bet when you don't win so betting one on red and being right means your total increases by 1, otherwise it would be totally pointless - you'd only ever stand to lose money by betting on those odds otherwise
My heart skipped a beat! For a second I thought AwSHUX spring had started yesterday and I had missed it!
Only these guys can make a train wreck look so good.
The moment you flick back and rewatching Matt space out 🤣🤣
I have vegas edition. Came with everything you need. Have never seen an expansion.
Looks like he ordered "Vegas Wits & Wagers (2017)" instead of "Wits & Wagers: It's Vegas Baby! (2019)".
I loved watching this live, great to see it again (in preparation for tonight)! W&W became my most wanted game from this.
This made my heart happy! Thanks for the great entertainment all!
This is the kind of pile up I expect, and look forward to, from SUSD.
I had thought about playing this over zoom with family. I’ll stick to Just One and Herd Mentality as W&W is soooo much easier in person 😂😂😂
I believe the final scores were:
Omari - 3600
Quinns - 4100
OFPG - 4200
Emma - 6800
That was fun. There needs to be more Let's Plays. The pandemic made everything just so hard.
I think Quinns' feathers are very nice.
I don't know. 75?
Is it larger than the real answer? No? Then it doesn't loose
O.K., at 3 to one, you get your bet back and then three times that bet. So, 2+3- is 4.
Thank goodness for Mik and Starla!
Homer never had a problem getting hired. Well, not MUCH of a problem.
Steven King novels? I don't know. 102?
When Chat is ignored, Chat can get pretty insistent.
Jorden? 23?
M., S. and Q. for the big win!
Emma!
Reading chat after locking in your answer but BEFORE assigning chips = also cheating :)
Licensed games Edit
A total of 704 known licensed games (715 cartridges, including compilations of previously released games) were released for the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) during its lifespan... At least if we trust in Wikipedia ;)
Kinda wants those betting chips for my version.
i thought i knew how the scoring system worked and then i thought i did again and now i have no idea lmfao
LMAO nevermind figured it out
It feels like it should not be possible to bet 10to1 onto your own answer.
It balances itself out. For example look at both OFPG and Quinns scores. They only got a pay off once. I'm assuming that you can't put more than one token on it though, and probably no extra money, but who knows.
Yay!
MR PLOUGH
Awesome
Those push ups cant be real push ups... i assume just some kind of rocking motion..
It was incredibly painful to see Quinns convince everyone that gambling payouts work in an extremely wrong way. It also meant that everyone was getting much less money and that there was no reason for people to bet on the colors.
Edit: I was confused
@@MichaelNerman Yeah, when you play with actual betting rules you make money on the 1 to 1. The way they played it you just don't lose money which essentially makes them pointless spaces.
You're right. I misread the rules, and they played it wrong. The only weird thing with the rules is that you get your betting chip back even if it was on a wrong bet. I thought Quinns actually noticed the error, but didn't press it when Matt contradicted him.
it's so much more intuitive when you have physical chips, because then if you win, you take back the chips you put in, and THEN take an additional amount. when you're just tracking numbers i think it's less intuitive.
Haha yeah getting that totally wrong 🤦 you only lose the money you bet when you don't win so betting one on red and being right means your total increases by 1, otherwise it would be totally pointless - you'd only ever stand to lose money by betting on those odds otherwise
Surely it's best to have everyone hold up their answers at the same time....
No way, im first .Good job guy's