Nuclear War AI Simulation - Russia vs NATO
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июн 2024
- "World War 3 (Hour by Hour)
According to a survey prepared by the FAS and NRDC, there are approximately 23,300 nuclear weapons in the world stored at some 111 sites in 14 countries.
stage exchange of strikes
lead - 3 hours, casualties - 2.6 million
After it started, and As the nuclear threshold is crossed, the fighting escalates into a tactical nuclear war in Europe. Russia sends 300 nuclear warheads using aircraft and short-range missiles to hit NATO bases and advancing troops. NATO responds with about 180 nuclear warheads from aircraft.
nuclear war part one - 45 minutes - 3.4 million casualties
When Europe is destroyed, NATO launches a strategic nuclear strike of 600 warheads of U.S. land and submarine missiles aimed at Russian nuclear forces. Before it loses its weapons systems, Russia fires warning shots, responding with missiles launched from launchers, vehicles, and submarines.
nuclear war part two - attack on strategic centers - 45 minute casualties 85.3 million
The main purpose of the first nuclear strike is not to kill as many people as possible, but to destroy the very possibility of a retaliatory or second strike. All means of application have priority targets. These are primarily missile launch silos, military installations, large cities, large industrial plants, dams. If the power industry, the military, the government, if the power generation and transmission facilities are destroyed - the state will be destroyed irreversibly. In order to prevent reconstruction of the other side, Russia and NATO are striking at 30 of the most populated cities and economic centers of each other, using 5-10 warheads in each city, depending on the size of the population.
As a result of the nuclear exchange, the number of direct casualties, including deaths (34.1 million) and injuries (57.4 million), from the series of nuclear exchanges.
Stage 2 nuclear fallout
The horror of radioactive fallout lies in its ability to spread radiation over a wide area, affecting people, animals, and the environment. Exposure to high levels of radiation can cause acute radiation sickness, which can lead to symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue. In severe cases, radiation sickness can be fatal.
27 million more people will die.
Stage 3 nuclear winter and famine
The biosphere received such a blow that it is unlikely to recover and return to its original state. The ecosystem of the equatorial zone, which is tuned to almost constant temperatures, will be particularly affected. There, even if forests are not burned, higher forms of life will disappear, apparently, completely or almost completely.
According to scientists, about 5 billion people in 2 years may die as a result of a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia, which confirms the need for global cooperation to prevent it.
Let's say no to any war! And it is better to create something new than to destroy ourselves." - Развлечения
NO ONE wins in a nuclear war. In fact, WE ALL LOSE.
I keep saying that to everybody. THERE WONT BE NO WINNER. THERE WILL BE NO ONE TO DETERMINE THE WINNER! Tell that to the fucking US goverment that they are maniacs on destroying Russia. The Russians screwed up so bad in their war, that deep down they begging for a freeze of the conflict. Another thing..There would have been peace allready since March 2022. That gloabalist puppet, Boris Johnson trevelled personally to Ukraine to cancel it. Fuck Liberal Democracy and the deep state.
@@didamzuleminji199 No more Russia so no.
You wil ask hero shima Naga saki people what is atomic bomb they explained u Rusia win lol
yea we will,,because of those arrogant fools....
Russia stand no chance it can not even win in Ucrane lol
Crazy how the whole world could get destroyed over guys in suits who don’t agree with each other 🤦♂️
And old ass guys over 70 too . Putin and Biden are going to bite the dust soon so they don’t care
how could the USA drop two nuclear bombs on Japan?
@@SVYATOGOR.Cause Japan fucked around and found out.
@@SVYATOGOR. with a joy
@@SVYATOGOR. Don't understand what you are asking?
“A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.”
When a computer is cleverer than most humans.
How about a nice game of chess?
You should have told Putin that.
From wargames 😊
@@user-jn2gc8fk6q really? thanks 😂
I gotta be honest. I'm not sure I would count the people surviving a nuclear war as the lucky ones.
A former teacher of me once said:"When you hear the sirens, sit outside, have a glass of wine and pray to get vaporized, because the ones who leave their bunkers after a few months, will either starve or die from radiation sickness.".
NO ONE wins in a nuclear war. In fact, We're ALL going to die.
Years of nuclear winter would follow. Eventually everyone would succumb.
@@davidwood2205
Yeah for 3 Years and all Green will die on Surface and all what eats the Green will be long dead (same for the one who eats the Greeneater) ... Happy three Years!^^ 😑
why even start a statement with "i gotta be honest" ? Its a brain dead phrase. So, you're not honest the rest of the time ?
That awkward moment you turn the video off but the sirens are still playing 😐
lmaaaao
😮😮😂😂😂
Where are you at? Kiev?
🤣
🤣🤣🤣
If an all-out nuclear war happened I would prefer turning into dust from the first bomb before I even knew there was a nuclear war. Having to deal with radiation, collapse and a nuclear winter is so much worse!
From the 80s when we lived it every day I always said I'd walk outside and wait for it
@@TheDesertraptor Probably do the same, its like a zombie apocalypse scenario (where the military fails which realistically it wouldnt) i'd rather kill myself than face any other alternative
I on the other hand love a challenge
@HassiYahaya What animals? lol
@HassiYahayaon God. Fuck they mean "I'll wait for it" 😂😂
5 hours in and the war takes as many lives as ww2 did
Ok so it turns out I’m really bad at reading, but still, almost as many deaths as ww1
*28 days in
Way more, way way more.
Задача подобных роликов - при помощи большого числа аккаунтов на youtube (из твиттера их выкинули), используя antidetect soft создать иллюзию массовой истерии или поддержки russian людоедов. Романтизация русской культуры. Достоевский - это пропаганда русского образа жизни, пропаганда челобития, имперского величия, шовенизма, холуйства. Поймите. Все russian - это фейк. Russian weapon - неэффективный хлам, который годится разве что как инструмент пропаганды. Ядерное оружье в таком же ужасном состоянии и его нужно немедленно изъять у государства-террориста. В тактико-технические характеристики любых русских товаров уже заложено примерно 90% пропаганды. В реальности весь мир увидел кто такие русские и чего они стоят на поле боя. Пустое место. Если вы не накажете русских милитаристов, то они не сделают никаких выводов. Неотвратимость наказания - единственное оружье против зверя, не способного интегрироваться в цивилизацию. Гены свободолюбивых людей не успели оказать влияние на их популяцию.
Please translate... Its very important.
Я жил в России. Я, убежденный сторонник распада России на независимые государства, так как понимаю что не Путин начал войну, а русский народ, который вдохновил Владимир Владимировича Путина на эту войну, сделав из обычного вора, настоящего императора и собирателя земель русских.
На Западе, в США и Канаде политики не только живут в стереотипах и мифах о якобы "хорошем народе" и плохом президенте. Эти мифы навязываются либеральным крылом московского Рейха, который называет себя русской либеральной оппозицией.
Благодаря работе так называемых русских диссидентов многие на Западе и в США романтизируют русскую культуру, не понимая что это ФАСАД. Это потемкинские деревни. Для западного обывателя Россия - это Достоевский. Россия - это Булгаков. Но в реальности Россия - это зверские убийства в Буче, Мариуполе, Ирпени, Одессе. Россия - это изнасилованные и убитые девочки в Украине. Русский мир - это десятки тысяч детей, которые были угнаны на территорию России и Беларуси.
Для немцев в 1938 фашизм был отклонением от нормы, но для россиян в составе империи фашизм - это абсолютно естественное состояние.
Я не знаю, понимают ли на западе, что государства РОССИЯ давно нет. Есть криминальные группировки, которые делят воровской общаг. Вы понимаете это?????
Россия - это 2000 семей, у которых в подчинении 100 миллионов абсолютно бесправных голов.
Западные и американские политики мыслят строго в рамках отведенного им короткого политического срока и распад империи выходит далеко за границы их политической карьеры, поэтому им проще усадить Путина за стол переговоров. Путин же мыслит десятилетиями, если не сказать столетиями. Если Россия и сядет за стол переговоров, то это будет лишь передышкой перед настоящей глобальной войной. 75-80% россиян готовы десятки лет терпеть любые экономические лишения, ради нанесения западной цивилизации неприемлемого ущерба. Это искренне и это не излечимо никакими благами цивилизации! У россиян было все и они сознательно от всего отказались. Я знаю это, я жил с ними много лет. Я каждый день видел, как русский глубинный народ у подъездов причетает, что весь мир против России и не даёт им спокойно убивать в Украине.
Вы считаете что Украина сражается за себя? она сражается за вас, чтобы конфликт не распространился на весь мир? Вы думаете русским нужна только Украина? Еще во времена 56 kbit модемов русские мечтали ударить по Вашингтону и ввести войска под Ламанш. Никакой пропаганды в России тогда не было - это искреннее желание русского "народа". Вы имеете дело со сбродом, смысл жизни которого состоит в том, чтобы другие народы жили хуже, чем они. Чужие неудачи и люди живущие под мостом - вот основной контент, который потребляют русские в свободном интернете. Русские ненавидят и не просятят вам ваш успех. Антиамериканизм русских на порядок более фундаментален, чем антиамериканизм "Аль-Каиды". Русские будут терпеть любые лишения, лишь бы испортить вашу жизнь. Вы имеете дело с "этносом", у которого нет иммунитета к пропаганде.
Русские тысячи лет не имели прав собственности, их обменивали на скотину и на дрова. Никакого ремеленичества и торговли они не знали. Потомство в россии успевали дать исключительно предатели и доносчики, а посты занимали наименее талантливые, но наиболее лояльные власти особи. Чем более преступлений совершала их власть, тем больше поддержки было от простого народа. Вы понимаете какое "качество" человеческого материала получила данная популяция? Вы понимаете, что только распад и фрагментация империи позволит населению россии излечится от имперского величия? Если этого не сделать, то придет новый Путин, а затем новый и так до бесконечности. Любого здравомыслящего лидера русские в составе империи отвергнут.
Please translate... Its very important.
Нужна довольно сильная активность в англоязычных сообществах, чтобы донести правду о россии до вашего общества и до ваших политиков. Речь идет не об экономике, а об экзистенциальной угрозе. Так же необходимо построить бот ферму на базе современных антидетект решений в российском сегменте интернета, с целью усиления сепаратистских настроений, основанных на признаках национального самоопределения каждого оккупированного россией народа (тыва, якутия, бурятия, осетия, ингушетия, татарстан, чечня и десятки других регионов).
Да, я понимаю, что во все времена, всякого рода иностранных авантюристов привлекала Россия. Привлекала прежде всего своим диким, темным и раболепным населением, из которого можно не церемонясь и не соблюдая прав человека выжимать все соки!
Все иностранные неудачники, которым не досталась власть в своих странах, ехали в Россию, чтоб получить возможность реализовать свои амбиции: получить власть, деньги, рабов и природные ресурсы! Но сейчас не время заигрывать с людоедами. Иначе ваши дети или даже вы сами будете расплачиваться за свои ошибки, но уже своей кровью.
Посмотрите на себя со стороны. Вы снова занимаетесь тем же, чем занимались в 1930-x годах прошлого века - а именно умиротворением агрессора. Вы пытались "договариваться" даже тогда, когда Гитлер вместе со Сталиным напал на Польшу. Вы не осудили руссизм (russiZm) и после нападения на Финляндию. Молчали, когда Сталин делил Европу. Не помоги Корее освободить свою территорию от Советского влияния. Позволили русским забрать все яддерное оружье под ваши же гарантии безопасности в 1994 году. Вы молчали, когда русские дважды устроили геноцид в Чечене и отмалчивались при нападении на Грузию. Вы не осуждаете руссизм (russiZm) и сейчас за поддержу вялотекущих конфликтов в Молдове и Азербайджане. Вы не осудили руссизм (russiZm) за поддержку Хусейна, Каддафи, Модуро, Милошевича и других людоедов. Вы сотрудничали с русскими в Сирии, хотя прекрасно знали, что за поддержкой Игил стоит Россия. Вы видели как русские бомбят мирные районы Алепо, но продолжаете выражать озабоченность. Вы по прежнему считаете, что русские ни в чем не виноваты? Вы все еще верите рассказам русских, что нужно разделять народ и правительство? Вы боитесь распада России? Вы все еще верите, что русские хотят свободы?
Вы постоянно пишите про страх эскалации и выражаете озабоченность. Вы боитесь третьей мировой войны, не так ли? Не сомневайтесь, с таким подходом как сейчас .... вы ее получите. Путин видит ваш страх и питается им.
I was station in Germany from 1983 to 1985. I was in the US Army. 3 rd Armored Division 503rd combat Aviation Battalion C company. We basically new that once the first missile was launched our planet was done . Game over. We had our rockets pointed at them they had theirs pointed at us . There was a saying i don't know who said it but it says something like the survivors will envy the dead. I hope that we never have to face this situation.
Of all people it was Nikita Khrushchev. Where you guarding the Fulda Gap? The only thing I ever heard about Soviet plans to attack the West was the best route into the heart of Europe. I also figure every square inch of it was mapped out for artillery and eventually tactical nukes would get used if Russian penetration got far enough. You should read Tom Clancy Red Storm Rising.
@@pschroeter1 yes that was our main objective
1987, Ft Bragg... 82nd we know we would be hit in 30 minutes or less.... offshore would be about 15 minutes.
You will never, your rocket have ever been empty, there is no nuclear weapons.
@@clmtncd8750 WE will see. ww3 has already started supper Covid like China Vireses are coming next week.
Will this affect the release of GTA VI?
Top comment
Ахахаха 😅
Fallout 5.
Soon in your homes
God forbid
Exept everyone will be a ghoul
The fact humans have the capacity to completely obliterate the entire planet is unbelievable..like bro thats a WHOLE ASS PLANET
Well, don't blame "humans", blame the psychopaths who have now hijacked most governments in the world especially the West. Study this more but most liberals, progressives, communists and satanists think there are too many human beings on the planet so to them a nuclear war is a necessary evil to "correct" the planet. That is the type of psychopathy we are dealing with.
It wouldn't destroy the planet, the planet would just shrug it off. it would just make it uninhabitable for many species for many years.
No old mens you mean, old mean can push the button.... its crazy
Well, we would be able to recover, but it would take a lot of time. You know, if the Roman Empire survived, we would have colonised the Solar System by now. There was also a big ass volcano eruption somewhere in the stone age, reducing the population of humans from hundreds of thousands to just hundreds.
@@DmitryySergeevich: Actually it was 8,000.
Oppenheimer: “Albert, when I came with those calculations, we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world.”
Einstein: “I remember it well. What about it?”
Oppenheimer: *“I believe we did.”*
🥶🥶🥶
We are still somewhere between the start and the end of that chain reaction. Most likely.
God that quote sends such chills
Goosebumps every single time
📈📈📈
Imagine the people that survived all the 3 stages and start over, forming up again a civilization, re inventing and redefine everything in such catastrophe.
Then we can finally make History 2!!!
The matrix..who knows,maybe it has already happened and we will live it again and again until we learn..or maybe we will just live it again and again ,period.😢
The Russians believe they can win a war like this, and they invest billions toward that end every year. They have huge underground bunkers that can house much of their population. They are FAR more prepared than we are.
I don't think its possible. There are sooooo many nuclear warheads out there that the planet will be destroyed. No plants, no animals and likely no atmosphere. After the radiation dissipates, expect Mars.
History repeats itself
They'd just go through the same stages of life as we did and they'd fight again until another big war breaks out
2 men are in a basement full of gasoline. One has 10 matches the other has 20. Who wins?
@Nick_Zan I don't think you understood the joke there bud
The guy who sold the gasoline and the matches, for sure.
you lost me at when 600 nukes was fired it would take less than 20 to end all of the EU.
lol. No it wouldn't. You need multiple nukes to destroy most cities anyway.
Ok, let's see what happens if Russia drops a Tsar Bomba on London. That bomb had a 35 km blast radius and even broke windows hundreds of km away back in 1961. London wouldn't just be damaged; it'd be annihilated along with surrounding areas. And forget about living in those parts for years due to radioactive fallout. By the way, both Russia and the U.S. say they have nukes way stronger than that now@@FrostbitexP
@@laylen245 yeah because Russia just has a couple of Tsar Bombas lying around... no such bomb exists anymore as it's way too impratical to use. China has the biggest nukes currently which at 5mt, are only 1/10th of the size of Tsar Bomba. It's far more effective to fire multiple smaller nukes than one big one anyway, so the numbers do make sense.
Lol Nope
If you'd watched the movie War Games you'd know the only winning move is not to play.
Watch Threads if you really want to be scared.
Would You like a game of Chess instead ?
@@jamieharmer5654I wouldn't mind
what? my country being invaded. Lets play dead?!
better play dead than to be dead
This should be on every TV in the world at least once a day.
Especially the diarrhea part
Exactly 😮😮😮
So to really break it down and over simplify it...with the effects nuclear war would have on earth, it makes about as much sense as burning the whole house down because you got into a fight with your roommate.
Yes. Or….. because you saw a spider lol. Or “killing an mosquito with a grenade.”
More like burning your whole street down
i mean if you anyway about to die why not .
Unfortunately, this is the sort of thing that people do.
what if youre black and youre roomate is a literal slave master kkk guy who is havin breakdown and ur in an isolated area and he wants to actually make you a slave and torture you for the rest of youre life. Then yeah you may actually wanna burn the house down.
the idea is like, we wont submit to you, says the other side, wed rather die than submit. thats the point its liek dont even fucking try a ground invasion or we all die.
Russia has that thought pattern, and they believe , correctly7, that the west is in a cultural war against christian heterosexual family units and they are right, they would be forced to be gay and let pedophiles run loose if nato invaded and made rusiainto ukraine, theyd make all their women into hookers. so russia woudl rather die and kill everyone than have atanisst force their way ina nd make children have gay sex. which si what theyre doing in europe. and soi they see it as a real threat, and if you disagree then ask yourself, why oes nato keep proving r8ussia then? like do u thinkm russia is the only agressor? sorry but yah nuclear war is necusary when satanic weirdo homosexual livberal obama biden pedophi9le people come ouyt and try to teach gay sex to ur kids in school and give excuses as to why ist necisary and then fightf or killin g babies as theri favorite main political agenda. like abortion is the only thing the left cares about SO YEAH nuclear wa may be necisary. wed rather DIE than have teh west make all our kids gay and make us slaves.
it’s not “who will win?” but it’s more like “who will lose less?”
I was hopeful, yet at 2:13 my hope quickly faded when stage 2 (nuclear fallout) started
Worrying is absolutely pointless. Live your life. The world is ran by psychopaths.
I think we should find way make world better. Do you can, will be what will be. You agree?
if those psychopaths rape and kill you you can`t live your life
@@visualiser3d nothing we can do, those in pentagon do not listen us. and who can tell what is better anyway? humans destroyed countless species (and billions of humans). perhaps it would be better for the universe if humans cease to exist... species aiming 10000s nuclear warheads at each other probably dont deserve to exist.
The lives of all living things on the planet depend on these psychopaths - including yours!
@@visualiser3d revolution!
The fact that Biden or Putin pretty much single-handedly can start this does not make me feel any safer.
I feel you, I just woke up the other day and there is like a fucking mutiny like a week ago, covid, war. what's gonna happen next? fucking aliens, nuclear war? fuck all these leaders
probably USA might start this nightmare, they are moving closer and closer to Russia boarders with NATO
@@Kreoni Yeah. Or Biden might press that button just of curiosity because he forgot what it is
@@UltraWhale Two old men with decayed brain rule two nuclear superpowers. No matter what people believe in, democracy or something more authoritarian, this situation is completely nuts.
@@karabardinhad our illustrious emperor, Nicholas II, not been killed by communist barbarians, this situation would never have come to pass. He was one of the great leaders at the Geneva Convention!
What time is it on the nuclear apocalypse clock?
So that's what it fells like to have more than 50milion power on Rise of Kingdom
Just think for a minute. The guy in Washington with nuclear codes cant even ride a bike or walk up stairs.
Gives me a warm fuzzy feeling inside!
The guy in Russia is a murdering powerhungry psychopath.
More brains than t rump😊
Think for another minute, Putin a warmongering dictator has access to nukes.
Another minute Kim Jong un a military focused slave driving dictator has access to nukes
Another minute Communist dictator in China has access to nukes.
Another minute, a corrupt Israel prime minister that is far right and supports terrorists have access to nukes
@@jillsommerville7828 Says the person who can't even type!
Am I the only one that thinks if this happens might as well go outside and try to count the missiles in the sky?
I'm going to raid everyone around me and take their canned beans
No, their beers since you can drink more and faster than eat!
may as well honestly lol
How will you count when blind after the first one?
@@justuskruse8268 just count all of them before the first one hits, DUH /s
At least on the scale of just Earth, it’d be like Infinity War, but worse.
"I don't know what will cause WWIII but I know WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones" Albert Einstein
I don't think there would be WWIV lol
@@user-us4hl3zr2b where there is humanity there will be war.
there wont be humans left for a fourth
@@vNill there will be humans on this planet until the Sun goes super nova. I understand your sentiment.
@@america1st721 When sun explodes, humanity will be either long extinct, or advanced so high, that they will be long time gone from anywhere near the blast radius, nothing in between.
Don't worry. Our beloved "betters" who started and intentionally escalated this war will be living it up in bunkers, laughing at the rest of us who were foolish enough to let them lead us into hell.
“…living it up in bunkers…” is an oxymoron.
@@JJ_Khailha nice catch.
Well, they can enjoy their desolate wasteland then
I hate politicians altogether. All scum
YEP! They're trying their damndest to get it started, every time they cross a line and nothing happens, then they intentionally cross the next line and on and on until that fuse is lit and can't be put out. This is 100% what they want because they already have it planned out for them and their families to be flown to safety. I pray to GOD in heaven that it backfires on their asses!💥😔
Why would you only get 1.4 times as many wounded than killed in _nuclear_ strikes when even in a _conventional_ war, it's already at least _three_ times as many wounded?!
Why there is a lot new videos about nuclear attack and war beetwen Russian and USA? Im scared of such strange things, is is so bad situation now?
Thumbnail: "Who will win?" Seriously? Does anyone really think there are winners in this scenario?
The scumbags who will initiate the war will. They already have all their bunkers and mountain retreats fully secured and stockpiled with over 100 years of food, water, air etc. Learn reality please. Psychopaths will go this step to rid this planet of humanity so they can take over for the long term.
The devil
No one wins world destruction
south america wins if neither side attacks it ???
Mauritius
Imagine surviving snd having to live in a radioactive hellscape.
not only ☢☁ its literally years of 🥶
Fallout games?
imagine surviving only to find out that there are still Russians.
@@kparker2430or murricans
Imagine being stabbed to death by a person who just feels uncomfortable about you sitting to close to him. who believe its ok to stab you in the back just because of this. Then imagine this person having ultimate power over a nuclear arsenal. sounds dangerous right?
This scenario is pretty close in a frightening way.
Millions of years later... Earth: Despite the pain, I'm glad those horrible humans are no more. They really were the worst.
As if. Earth isn't capable of thinking.
Humans are the best thing that ever happened in this boring rock. Whitout humanity there wouldn't be no music, no medicine, no anime/manga, no internet... etc... in short, it would be a boring and meaningless place whitout us.
@@DiogoJ1what a small mind. Like we deserve anything.
@@CarlMartRod Hardly. That's just logical thinking. Earth isn't an indvidual, not even a living or spiritual being.
We are the only living beings in this planet that are capable of being and distinguishing good and evil, so we do deserve what we get, whetever it's a reward or a punishment, depending on our actions.
Small thinking is thinking we are insignificant, when we already accomplished more than most beings in many lightyears range.
@@DiogoJ1 there would be no need, animals dont need music and manga, neither do the oceans or the forests, the Earth would be better off without humans in almost every way.
@@zack7438I disagree. What good is life and the world, if we aren't there to see it?
Animals don't even worship gods. What a boring existance the world would be whitout us humans.
This is absolutely terrifying 🫣
I hope people don't bring it to this
@@visualiser3d me too, it’s not looking good as of right now
It’s beautiful.
Мени је застрашујуће то што укронацисти гађају нуклеарну електрану у Запорожју а читав Запад се претвара да се ништа не догађа.
@@mladensofrenovic4860 i'm in America & I don't like us helping Ukraine at all! Such a waste of our resources.
Imagine you are working and you are best at it, you think of your future , with your wife and children and suddenly a bomb like this falls nearby💀
How do you feel when you are on a bus driven by a crazy driver or a politician?
Imagine how overwhelmed the health care system would be.
there wouldn't be any left......
Colapsaria totalmente.
There would be no health care system, and no people to overwhelm it
it wouldn't exist anymore, at that point, it's everyone for himself
At the fear of extinction women will be forced to get pregnant repeatedly.
The nuclear winter is completetly hypothetical, with recent calculation youd need alot more bomb and atmospheric residue kicked up to cause such an event.
US: Retains first use policy
Russia: No first use policy unless Russian territory captured. e.g. Crimea
China: No first use policy
According to Scott Ritter Russia has no doctrine of limited nuclear war. They would immediately fire about 5,500 warheads to minimize further nuclear attacks. US casualties Day 1, 70-165 million.
USA: Start the war! Kill them all! Rewrite the history later!
Russians were always counted with all out nuclear war, they had underground bases all over russia and this shoot them all nuclear war strategy. They also deployed nukes in every russian satelites capitol city. It's not public but we knew and probably the americans knew too. If there would be a nuclear war all of the western satelite countries would be nuked with Russia except they had no chance to survival while the russians has the chance surviving underground.
Nobody could win a nuclear war but Russia could destroy the world and try to survive.
Russia would use those nukes to destroy American nuclear sites and military facilities. Russia won’t target civilians or cities. So American casualties would be at most a couple million.
LOL you don't need a policy for first use. They are all geared to go at the drop of a hat. Following policy is just a delay. BTW your 2 replies before mine are lost.
As much as you’d like to think Russia would win out don’t be stupid, the US would meet force with force and Russia would be annihilated just like everyone else 👍🏻
Crimea is not Russian. It is Ukranian and was illegally annexed. I will support the US government in any action they take to see it returned.
Please 🙏 don't destroy ours world please rember this is only place and planet that we All come for we were all born here we are all brothers and sisters only look a little different but we care remember our children they are the future that's why they are born in this
The planet will be just fine. Society as we know it, not so much.
Thank you for your point) I hope we have majority people like you!)
Yes dear!
No problem! Remove military bases from the borders of Russia, do not expand NATO, do not dream of the collapse of our country and you can live in peace. We won't hurt you.
If the anglo saxons mind their own business the world will be at peace. Anglo saxons hunger for power is the problem for the world.
Do we really need a video to explain who's going to win a nuclear war? Nobody.
You'd be surprised how many people need to know this..
@@A1509MDIXfr those comments are pissing me off
There would be a winner ultimately but there would be no point in winning if 90% of the world is dead.
I think it's because they want to live in that fallout lifestyle and Metro 2033. Those people want to play dress up and kill each other in a post apocalyptic world.
how do 2 million people get rid of 5 million bodies in a radiated area in a two year time period?
What? Some cites in China have like 60 million. Way more than that in 2-3 hours.
The only problem with this video is assuming the it would be Russia who would launch the nukes.
You already got neocons in Washington asking NATO to provide nukes to Ukraine.
Another huge problem with your videos is that you assume that NATO will launch all their nukes while Russia will launch less than a sixth of theirs.
I assure you that in the event of all out nuclear war, it is not Europe which will be the primary target but the US.
Exactly! stupid videos like this encourage Americans to support it. Most Americans can't even point usa on a map without a label. We would perish.
The Russians know where the snake's head is and they will cut it off first - only ashes will remain there!
Disinformation spreading troll
@velvet1865 That flag says it all.
Russia has about 1/3 of their total warheads that are in a launchable state. most of them are sitting in a state of disrepair or being swapped out for maintenance. The US and NATO has currently most of it's arsenals in a ready state. That is the big difference in all of this. also 3/4 of NATO warheads are mounted on submarines that will be close to target areas when launched so will take out command and control structures very early and will hamper the guidance/radar capability of the Russians main missile arsenal. Remember, NATO is not just the US, there are a lot of other countries in NATO that have nuclear weapons that would be used against Russia under article 5 if it came to that.
Everybody loses in an atomic war.
Yet our "leaders" insist on playing nuclear chicken with the nuclear bear. Of whom their stockpile and armament can wipe the US off the map in 1 hour. Not even exaggerating.
Many places will not be targeted or even affected. At least initially. Most of the Southern hemisphere will be just fine, the further South you are.
There would certainly be winners or so called "survivors" but there would be no point in surviving if the human population will die out in the next 12 months
@@carrisasteveinnes1596even still
1:07 Why would Russia be firing warning shots after it had already shot 300 initial rockets?
Visualiser failed to convince the audience particularly visually by relaying the gravity of the nuclear explosions and fallout.
Keep a 12 gauge handy if u survive the initial exchange. What comes after is worse than death.
@@CertifiedAbyssGazerthink the 12 gauge is for ur self but ok
You count only NATO and Russian nuclear potential, but there is also other nuclear powers on globe.
Nato and Russias nuclear power is larger than everybody else I assume.
USA and Russia = 90% of nukes.
India and China? I doubt they would do anything in this case.
@@mnemonicpie I hope we'll never find this out ;)
They don't need to get involved to destroy the world.
Russia and NATO have enough between themselves to make this happen.
"We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when..."
Let's say no to Putin. Saying NO to War in the western world will not cause the end of war in Ukraine.
I feel like his initial estimated losses of life is super low to what it’d really be
If there's a nuclear exchange you'll want to be part of the group that gets vaporized. All worst parts of those disaster movies come after
Well i want to see first, then a bullet can be my demise
@@skepabbas9400 True, that would be something to see
@@skepabbas9400 nah a bullet would hurt too much with too much risk, instant vaporization would be like switching the lights off, you wouldn't even feel it.
This is what some far out thinkers happened on Mars.
word. Do you know all of the extinct civilizations? I wont assume that i do. Yet there are traces. Lets do Space archeology! Wich on this planet with our currentday societies, will probably be talked about over 50/ 100 years from now. P.s. How many subjects have you seen that recently got pulled out of the pseudo corner they where banned to? Hydrogen, T.H.C. Bacteria, etc. etc. Glad we the general public can say (and the consensussociety now also dares it alswell) that there is water on Mars. Unbelievable the hysteria around that fact, until 2008. So yeah better keep those possibilities open. Dont be all too lemming, to what the academic conscensus circle cooks up. p.p.s i really hope you are a american from a young most recent society...whom clearly misses how much lore there is throughout all Asia on this matter. And for how long they already talk about it, its from a civilization that ran at least 12000 years. Wish we were back in the 80's again where folks we're happily and constructively challenged to think technical and inspiring.
"Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man. For this, he was chained to a rock and tortured for eternity."
You guys have to remember "Futurama" : ) Its really good explanation about that SHIT what will be happen soon.
In either case, future is nuclear. Either nukes or 4th gen SMRs.
You're right, either it destroys us or help us jump forward.
All depends on how we use it.
Just like AI, which is the second either biggest threat or biggest advancement for everyone.
If we use both for good we'll enter the biggest technological singularity.
Or if used for war, the doom of humanity.
Reason why Dictatorships are a threat to the whole world. Egomania of few men ruling over regular people is dangerous. Even if in democracies the systems are corrupt, there's a limit of what people are ready to let go.
In a dictatorship, the do as they please, and make most of their people suffer.
this was honestly chilling to watch hopefully and that's all we can really do hope this Ramians a simulation.
Bring it. Let me push the launch button. We are less than a piece of lint. The universe will not even shrug.
Is this Brian Cranston Narrating?
The only reason to have a nuclear war is to hit the reset button
False. The reason is because a belligerent nation has launched one or more hydrogen bombs at your waypoint. Keep calm and return fire.
@@paulcooper1046 shut up Paul. The US used nukes as a emergency stop. And we already recognise in all the worlds governments that they rather help to setup Nature against us. So to them less of a disaster, but rather a restyled way of the annual 90th year "bringing the population down" ritual.
Well look at the bright side no more income taxes
That alone will be worth it.
5 billion dead in 2 years following a nuclear winter. Insane how two countries who battle might irreversibly change the future of every single living organism on the planet.
I'm pretty old, so I remember when nuclear war seemed inevitable. I first became seriously aware of nuclear war in the 1970s, but there was shockingly little scientific information available. It was the 1980s when nuclear war seemed extremely likely. I read two books that dealt with the topic, "Warday" a fictional account I read over Christmas week (I received the book as a Xmas gift) and "Life After Doomsday" which was essentially the first "preppers" handbook.
the world need peace 🕊️
Imperial Japan and the Third Reich didn't concur with your sentiments.
When earth is in pieces there will be peace-!
Tell that to Russia
This will not happen - the Americans have run out of Indians on their continent, the poor people have nothing left to kill, and they have started looking for natives all over the planet!
@@A1509MDIX*USA
Well I got my bottlecaps ready for whenever the post-nuclear war comes...
what does this mean? I'm not a native english speaker
@@pooshpoosh9232 its from one of the best video game series
@@pooshpoosh9232 Reference to a video game called Fallout.
@CertifiedAbyssGazer Damn bro all I did was reference Fallout lol
I'm gonna play fallout now. Great game! 😊
They're not going to do a call of duty game on this one
It’s not that serious
I’m pretty sure the iron dome can spot the rocket and stop it before it even hits the ground lol
And... you always ignore South America, Africa and Australia in these simulations😂
Because they're not nuclear powers, so they wouldn't be directly targeted by either Russia or NATO.
@@SouthernGryphuswe will feel the consequences when the citizens from the states that caused the apocalypse come to us seeking food and shelter tho (this will lead to recession, famines, etc.)
@@SouthernGryphusBrazil used to be a nuclear power
Good leave us out of it, we might survive and thrive while the Northern half of the globe burns.
@@neth77 Chances are, China might try to invade both Australia and New Zealand.
Um país que constrói um mega hospital em tempo recorde, pontes incríveis desafiando a natureza, não é pra ser sub-estimado dessa façanha.
The only bomb that scares me is the one some random terrorist has stashed away in a cave somewhere that everybody's long since forgotten about.
From the 1983 movie, "War Games"
"A strange game; the only way to win is not to play."
If you think someone will win in a nuclear war you are lost ... "In a nuclear world true enemy cant be destroyed because it is war itself !!!"
This appears to use arsenal sizes of the cold war rather than what the US and Russia currently have. It would still be devastating but not quite to this degree.
people seem to forget that there have been over 400 atmospheric nuclear tests and no nuclear winter.
@@KleinAB Yeah the US and Russia currently only have around 1600 warheads a piece that are in a state to be launched. That could definitely do some massive damage but it wouldn't be anything like what is depicted in this video. Also the total number of tests is currently at 2,056.
@@ColonelBragg Sarmat!
I'm skeptical that Russia would only nuke the 30 largest cities in the U.S. I mean, why not bomb the top 50 cities, or top 100? They have more than enough nukes.
@@ColonelBragg Except, Russia has automatic systems (now prob by AI) in which if the command center is not responding, all ground ( subs) ICBM launches it selves on designated targets anyway.Damage will be in any case serious.
Why would they use 5-10 per city? Wouldn’t they just use what’s necessary to hit the underground silos? Come on man
It makes me relieved to know that if this happens I’ll be among those instantly vaporized, instead of suffering the fallout and winter
@@FA91NL go to hell instantly vs go through hell on earth and then go to hell?
I cry😭 after watching this video. I pray nothing like this should happened
Oh sweety, I'm sorry. I don't want to worry you. I think people are smart and don't start this. What you think?
Believe me, no ordinary people want this.
Moreover, I would rather have the opportunity to visit all countries and be friends with any people than to see what is happening now.
Greetings from Russia!
Go easy, man. Have a beer and watch a Bollywood-movie.
Thats why the NATO should stick to attacking Arab countries only and not try to provoke Russia 😅😅😅😅
@@KLIMYCHGAMES no ordinary people huh, tell that to dozens of goofy mf with ukranian flag on their profile pic
Save the nukes for when the aliens invade 👽
Aliens have multilayer advanced plasma shield with high heat resistance Armour 😂
@@justinyeo8458 nah they have Nokia 3311💀
Lol, there are no aliens anywhere nearby.
This must be a robot voice, no idea how to say NATO
'Mutually Assured Destruction'
Megadeth?
This reminds me of the climax of 1983 John Badham's movie WARGAMES : "No winner. What about a nice game of chess ?".
I was in Germany 1976/79, our company was at it's "GDP" for training..GDP means ..general defense position,close to east Germany border where Russia might invade..our fox holes were already in place by the combat engineer..that was a grim reminder on the true meaning of WAR.
Was M60a1 tank crew 1980 Ft Knox. We trained for nuke war much. I dreaded it.
I was in Bamberg at that time.
The result of just trusting science without questioning the morality/principles of scientists
Ordinary people don't have the capability to create nuclear bomb, napalm bomb or anthrax bomb, some scientists put the time and effort to create them
Correct. As Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany were trying to do as well. Study time for you, mate.
😅 I don't think that imperial japan and nazi german continued existing after Hiroshima and Nagasaki (the most unadvanced nukes) for them to improve and develop more devistating weapons tho...
@@paulcooper1046
"It is better to create something new than to destroy ourselves" impossible while Putin lives.
I genuinely hope this doesn’t happen in real life.
don't forget the 600+ nuclear power plants that will be going into meltdown also
You right! You think nuclear war can explode Nuclear power plants? I
@@visualiser3d nuclear power plants are the primary goal, as the nuclear strategy says, Russia offered peace back in the spring of 22 on conditions like Korea’s separation along the parallel, but the Western general said I quote us anyway how many Ukrainians die, we want them to kill Russians, but Russia offered peace but with the taking away of 4 regions according to the actual territories of control, Russia has 7,000 strategic and 4,000 tactical nuclear charges and will increase it by 50 percent by the year 27, as a citizen of Russia I will say we want peace, but as a military man I will say don’t force us your USA is not needed, but if necessary we will have to defend ourselves
@@Kot-ld1jk Russian peace is not real peace or they would not invaded Ukraine now after giving up its own nukes back in the 80s.
@@queenbrightwingthe3890 the United States will have to accept reality, they do not have the strength to push through Russia, this is a dead end
@@Kot-ld1jk It doesn't matter now many nukes you've got sunshine. If this ever happened every thing in the northen hemisphere of the planet is gone. Everything.
But let’s make sure to have a safe ArC to protect the jackasses that caused this in the first place.
Have you taken into account the anti-missile defenses? Systems such as GMD, THAAD, Arrow 3, Aegis equipped US Navy ships with SM-3's, and Russia's A-135 for ballistic missile defense and systems such as the Patriot and S-400/500 for cruise missile and air defense? No mention of interceptors was made during this video that I saw. There are thousands of nuclear *warheads* out there but the majority of the ICBM and SLBM based ones are in MIRV weapons, which means if an interceptor takes out an ICBM before MIRV deployment, it can take out anywhere from 12-16 warheads depending on the launching country and type of missile.
Along that line, did you account for ballistic missile submarine casualties during the conventional part of this war that went nuclear? A single American Ohio has (unclassified info here) 24 missiles, with up to 12 warheads a piece. That's up to 336 nukes destroyed from a single sub being sunk. Taking out a Russian Borei would destroy 96 warheads in a single blow and the US is meticulous in keeping track of where those submarines are. Did you also take into account attrition of nuclear capable bombers during the conventional war? Russian TU-95's and TU-160's wouldn't be sitting idle waiting for nuclear attack orders. The TU-160 in particular would take losses attempting to strike US carrier battlegroups or from stealth bomber strikes penetrating into Russia to specifically attack nuclear capable bomber bases. The same is true with US B-52's, B-1's, B-2's, and F-35's, though the last two would have significantly lower attrition rates due to being stealth.
This video appears to assume Russia and NATO's nukes are all able to be launched and that none are intercepted before impacting their targets. It's a nice worst case scenario, but in terms of likelihood in an actual world war it's pretty far down there. If you were to take wartime attrition, deliberate US targeting of Russian boomers, and interceptors into account, you'd probably have to cut the casualty count down to a tenth of what it is stated.
What shall we do if all the nukes launched from both sides are downed by anti-missile defense systems? As for me I'll go fishing. LOL
.
This guy couldn't decide on the pronunciation of NATO so he used 3 different pronunciations throughout the video.
all the people in the space station just chilling
until they run out of food
Ridiculously, someone ALWAYS has to build a bigger stick. Been that way sense the beginning of the human race. Plato said " only the dead know the end of War."
Right! One of the best quotes ever
A pale gray dot, the swirled blue marble ends.
MAkes me think that i would rather be in a zombie apocalypse than this, i might have a chance of survivng.
Look on the bright side though, even with 5 billion dead youve still got a nearly 50% chance of survival
Not if you are European
@@Disco-Mike 😆 Why forget that Europeans... are set out globally and... asif you know what 'hangs and chills in orbit'.
Please tell me more. I want understand
i don't know, are you shure it will be good news to survive in it?
Even if you survive after stage 3,you would either die of hunger,get murdered for supplies or slowly die of cancer
Imagine the world without nuclear warheads?? There could of been more conflict that has actually happened. Different way of looking at it
Mankind never terminated itself with those "classical" wars, here we doom the future as well
One could say that the threat of nuclear war inhibits the powers involved to get into all out conflict. But if the line is ever crossed, we're all going to be more f*cked than ever.
Calm before the storm 😔
Utterly fucked if you do, damned if you don't.
@@XPM22no I don’t really agree, if anyone is stupid enough to use nukes it would be North Korea.
After everything’s earths been through it would probably recover after a REALLY long time. But life always finds a way
We gon be playin fallout 4 for real.