Thanks Thabelo! This little camera can produce amazing images, you just have to feed it enough light and grade it proprely. The RAW format helps so much.
@@PLArseneau I can imagine it probably is pretty hungry for light. Take us through your grading process. Because honestly, you're convincing me slowly to actually pick one up.
@@of_tcm To be fair, on this one all I did was I had 3 nodes in DR. One for Denoise and Raw/Exposure/Tint/Temp settings; one for a Gen 4 to Buttery Lut Rec.709 lut and one for adjustements like added contrast or a bit of glow or a slight power window. Nothing crazy since this was just a test of the speedbooster.
I shot in Raw actually! I'm pretty sur I left everything at 800. The trick with this camera is to give it a lot of light. Almost over exposing/clipping. It loves it.
@@PLArseneau I figured you shot in RAW, but the footage with ISO 800 is impressive! Good job! Yeah, agreed; I am always riding the fine line of overexposing also.
Thank you for posting.. have you put the 0.58x MB Speed booster on your BMPCC4K? I am toying with the idea to make use of my vintage lenses as well as modern Lensbaby (Twist 60 for example) lenses. I don’t think I even mind much if it vignettes a little for that upcoming project. Otherwise is a better choice for the BMPCC4K the 0.64 (X, xl etc)? I do have a $100 Viltrox booster and it’s ok.. it degrades the image slightly, not that you can tell when a Twist 60 or Sweet 35 is on... but something like my Velvet 85 is a telescope on my BMPCC4K. Most of the fun parts of Lensbaby products are in the corners that the smaller sensor crops out.
I haven't tried yet, but I know for a fact that it will work when using the 2.8k crop mode, which could be very handy when shooting 120fps. I plan on using it for that purpose as well. I also have a Metabones MFT to EF bmpcc4k specific speedbooster .71 and it works amazing. Althought If I were to do it all over again I would get a .64XL instead. But at the time I had an APSC lens so I had no choice. The .58 will vignette hard from the speedbooster itself on the 4k sensor, unfortunately.
@@PLArseneau The 0.58x could be very handy for multiaspect shoots. With that whole circle to crop out a 16:9, 1:1 or 9:16. Need one for my bmmcc but can't wait to test it out on the 4k.
correct me if IM wrong, but according to the site a meta 0.58x speed booster would effectivly turn a 18mm-35mm = 10.5mm-20mm equivalent which is VERY wide. but these shots say otherwise
Awesome work!! I have this combo (except with a Viltrox speed booster). Happy New Year!!
It's a powerfull camera with a very small price and form factor. (My favourite travel camera for sure). Happy new year to you as well!
I said this on the Facebook group. I'm going to say it here again. You're a magician with this camera. You make it look exceptionally. Clean.
Thanks Thabelo! This little camera can produce amazing images, you just have to feed it enough light and grade it proprely. The RAW format helps so much.
@@PLArseneau I can imagine it probably is pretty hungry for light.
Take us through your grading process. Because honestly, you're convincing me slowly to actually pick one up.
@@of_tcm To be fair, on this one all I did was I had 3 nodes in DR.
One for Denoise and Raw/Exposure/Tint/Temp settings; one for a Gen 4 to Buttery Lut Rec.709 lut and one for adjustements like added contrast or a bit of glow or a slight power window.
Nothing crazy since this was just a test of the speedbooster.
I heard the Buttery LUTs don’t work with the og bmpcc or did you shoot in cinema dng and change the color science to gen 4?
Exactly yep! Gen 4!
Great shots! I assume ISO is 200. Have the same setup and 200 is sooooo clean. I was floored. Just need decent amount of light.
I shot in Raw actually! I'm pretty sur I left everything at 800.
The trick with this camera is to give it a lot of light. Almost over exposing/clipping. It loves it.
@@PLArseneau I figured you shot in RAW, but the footage with ISO 800 is impressive! Good job! Yeah, agreed; I am always riding the fine line of overexposing also.
they say this speedbooster doesnt work on the bmcc 2.5k but I've mounted it with no problem and havent taken it off since.
Interesting!
what happens when you put the .58 lens on a m43 camera like a gh4? does it work or crash into the sensor?
I am not sure.
Is the metabones EF or Canon mount?
EF
Thank you for posting.. have you put the 0.58x MB Speed booster on your BMPCC4K? I am toying with the idea to make use of my vintage lenses as well as modern Lensbaby (Twist 60 for example) lenses. I don’t think I even mind much if it vignettes a little for that upcoming project.
Otherwise is a better choice for the BMPCC4K the 0.64 (X, xl etc)? I do have a $100 Viltrox booster and it’s ok.. it degrades the image slightly, not that you can tell when a Twist 60 or Sweet 35 is on... but something like my Velvet 85 is a telescope on my BMPCC4K. Most of the fun parts of Lensbaby products are in the corners that the smaller sensor crops out.
I haven't tried yet, but I know for a fact that it will work when using the 2.8k crop mode, which could be very handy when shooting 120fps. I plan on using it for that purpose as well.
I also have a Metabones MFT to EF bmpcc4k specific speedbooster .71 and it works amazing. Althought If I were to do it all over again I would get a .64XL instead. But at the time I had an APSC lens so I had no choice.
The .58 will vignette hard from the speedbooster itself on the 4k sensor, unfortunately.
@@PLArseneau The 0.58x could be very handy for multiaspect shoots. With that whole circle to crop out a 16:9, 1:1 or 9:16. Need one for my bmmcc but can't wait to test it out on the 4k.
correct me if IM wrong, but according to the site a meta 0.58x speed booster would effectivly turn a 18mm-35mm = 10.5mm-20mm equivalent which is VERY wide. but these shots say otherwise
It turns into a 0.58 x 2.88(bmpcc og crop factor) x 18 = 30,1mm and 58,4mm
bello
good video :):):):):):):):):):):):):):)