Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Kodak Pro Image 100 Review | The BEST 35mm for Warm Climates
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 апр 2021
- Pro Image is an incredibly interesting film stock. But because of its name and branding, it comes with some scrutiny right out of the box. The use of the word “Pro” - and it being labelled as a Kodak Professional film on the box - whilst not being promoted as a professional film stock by Kodak themselves is confusing. In their professional brochures, it’s nowhere to be found. And Half the reviews you can find here online say it’s professional and the other half call it a consumer film.
---
Special thanks to:
Zoë (model): / zoeagerbeek
Emily (owner of the frontier scanner): / _emilymoranx_
---
If you're not bored of me yet and want to see more of me and my life in between my uploads, check out my Instagram: / daniloallen
Thank you for watching, make sure to subscribe (if you enjoyed it) so you can see all my latest uploads. And hit that notification bell!
#KodakProImage100 #KodakProfessional #KodakConsumerFilm #KodakFilmReview #DaniloAllen
© Comet Brace 2021
nice images. the outdoor ones really made the pro image shine
Thanks 😊 I agree, it’s a bummer that the colours from the studio shots aren’t quite the same - I feel like it’d be okay with strobe lighting though, I’ll have to try it the next time I access to a studio. Have you shot Pro Image that much yourself?
You have quickly become one of my favorite photographers and your reviews are so well done!
thank you 😊
Nice to see Pro image getting some love.
It's become my most used film this year.
I like all the other budget friendly colour negative films I have tried but pro image is the most versatile I in my opinion
Couldn’t agree more! ☺️
Yeah I have a roll of Kodak Pro Image professional and the role of Kodak color plus and 5 pack of PORTRA 400 iso professional .. I think it's all play with words , the only Film that's a professional film is Kodak PORTRA , but it does depend on the camera using , how you take the picture , the aperture and the lens your using , and if the light meter is working properly
Great outside photos I like your work! I shot Pro Image only once and I've been Happy with the results! I bought a 5 roll pack for this summer🤠
This definitely deserves more views. Great video !!
Very informative, living in Fiji's hot n humid climate and shooting lots of film, this vid convinced to order 50 rolls from my us suppliers, thank you for a great video.
I bought five packs especially for my holiday to Morocco. Purely because they can withstand the heat better.
Wow the skin tones on those portrait shots are amazing!
Right?! I really didn't expect that from Pro Image - but I'm so happy they did.
Photos are awesome! You just gained a follower!🤘🏻
thank you ☺️ I look forward to seeing your name around in the comments
I like your video. It really brings the ProImage 100 to the point. ProImage 100 is between Ektar 100 and Portra 160/400. However, I can provide another information. The ProImage 100 is according to Wikipedia an ISO160 film! I can provide with the link, if you like. And it is for sure, a consumer film, not at all a professional one.
Cool video, Danilo! I personally love this film, and it was quite (and I mean quite) popular down here in Brazil in the mid-2000s. It was ubiquitous and cheap, and at the same time it looked much better than the regular Kodak consumer negatives of the time. I really miss finding film easily at every corner.
Wow really! Good to know - I'll have to ask my family if they shot much with this much. Whereabouts in Brasil was this?
@@DaniloAllen Niterói, Rio de Janeiro. But I believe it was pretty common in the other states of the southeastern region of Brazil too. The price of this negative has just become too high around here. Such a shame.
Bro I love you're videos, they are so polished and professional. I haven't tried this film yet but from how you describe it I think I'll like it (ektar is one of my favs).
☺️ thanks! You should definitely give it a try!
Have you got any tips for me shooting Ektar? It’s coming up on my list of videos to make and I still haven’t decided how best to explore it.
@@DaniloAllen I've been shooting it box speed with good results on my mamiya 645 and a tripod. Mostly landscape and architecture photography. I bump up the shadow detail or lower contrast a tad in post if needed.
Have you got any links to your shots?
Just my insta. @chance_of_grain
@@heres_the_sauce Awesome shots - the colours on the Ektar frames are lovely - how did you scan the negatives?
awesome video, thank you for the content. I agree, its all about the image, forget the film snobbery. some reviewers have mentioned that pro image tends to render cooler toness and the blues and greens tend to render kind of like fuji, which is contrary to kodak's reputation of having warm reds, was this consistent with your experience?
Personally I found that it’s not as aggressively warm as other Kodak stocks. The greens and blues can look more like Fuji when it’s overcast but generally it’s still got a very Kodak look to it.
I made a video on my 2nd channel where I shot another roll - I don’t discuss the colour but you can judge for yourself if you’d like: ruclips.net/video/LeyKzFSPEB8/видео.html
I've got a roll of Pro Image sitting in my fridge and I'm sorely tempted to save it for some late autumn shooting here in NZ...apparently is doesn't love our harsh, lack-of-ozone light...regardless, I'm super excited to try it out!
Let me know how you go when you do shoot it! Have you shot pro image before?
@@DaniloAllen This was my first time shooting with it - it's suuuuuuper yellow in the sun but on an overcast day it's nice!
The video displays better color than the video of the film.
Would love it even more if there would be a 400 ISO version....
With the same latent image keeping ability - it’d be amazing to have a 400 or even 800 version
So you went with over exposing 1/3 a stop. I'm about half way through a roll so might try the rest on abit over exposed. My understanding was it wasn't crazy with dynamic range and the "pro" films generally have more dynamic range. Also what are you metering for in the pictures, skin?
I typically meter for skin in portraits and global exposure for scenes. From my understanding colour negative generally has great over exposure latitude - with the "pro" films having even better latitude. How did the rest of your roll go?
Professional film has nothing to do with what you have said. They are made to much tighter tolerances in terms of sensitivity and colour balance. They are designed to be stored under refridgeration to minimise any colour or sensitivity shifts that may occur and are designed to be used in a shorter period of time, shorter shelf life. If a professional was having a shoot which used, say 20 rolls of film, they needed consistency in all of their prints. In the darkroom days, they do not want the task of trying to adjust colour filtration to match colours. By contrast, consumer film are not made to such high tolerances. Most consumers would have typically bought one roll of film and may or may not have shot that whole roll in one session. That film may have stayed in their camera for months or longer. These films can be stored at room temperature.
Thank you for this information, I didn’t even think of it in that way
Really nice one !!
I do a video about this roll too :) in French but let me know how about it :)
Great pictures again
Cool, thanks!
Wow! A a whole two minutes of you in the video before we get to the point?
I would sure love to see a review video where the product that is under review is the actual star of the video. We know who you are so stop promoting yourself and give the product a more video time.
I tire of these 'Look at Me, I'm on RUclips!' videos when I desire honest review of a product.
You have issues. Get a check up
There is no such thing as a "pro" who shoots 35mm film.