By far the best Atc program out there's in my opinion, I have used the others as well, but they are not anywhere near the level, and the performance is so much better then before. I can't wait for the future. Great vid.
what is this video about, activesky, autofps, lossless scaling, frame generation I think there was something about an ATC in there but I can't be sure.
Why did they tell you to do the MCT transition? This only happends if their radar is broken in real world. Do ATC give further climb clearance if traffic is clear or do they robotically adhear to SID STARS completely? Do they give radar vectors or just keep you on the arrivals with no shortcuts? Can you request other type of approaches? Can you request things or is it only possible to do the absolut standard stuff? Do they correct you if you readback incorrect? Do they differ between Europe push start requests and US/CAN non-movement areas where push clearance is not required? Do this program include ramp ATC control?
To be honest I'm not sure. I'm not familiar with real world procedures into Manchester. It's possible to request specific approaches and transitions though. And direct to waypoints. Readback is very flexible. You could e.g. say: "Manchester approach, good evening, Speebird 246 at 9700 feet descending to 6000 feet". Voice recognition keeps getting better and better. You might want to ask these questions over at FSHud discord discord.gg/pr4mMQXU
@@captainpiett765 Ok thanks. Yea I am trying to make up my mind if Fshub or beyondATC is better/worth for the price. And no if ATC has radar coverage they always radar vector you unless the transition is direct into final. This is just a weird FSHUB feature which I don't why they use. Back in FSX the ATC could vector you for final. Seems like the ATC also just gave you climb as per the SID, not as per the traffic.
Hi , great video , I'm thinking about getting this and using it with aig, hows the performance compared to fsltl, and do the jetways connect to the AI traffic?
Hey man. I tried to record my flight yesterday with OBS, but after recording, the window of fshud is not showing in the video. Any idea why? Thanks . Damien
Do you mean the main app window? I've setup OBS so that it does a "display capture" ie everything on the display. I did have issues with sound though - couldn't find a separate audio channel for FSHud
Thanks! There is less performance hit than v1. Overall I don't think the hit is too bad. Of course this depends on traffic settings. I might do a separate video with comparisons.
I bought this ATC system for MSFS, and I have to say that I am not satisfied with how it works. The ATC voices are choppy and imprecise. Using the software on add-on airports is problematic because FSHUD does not recognize them. In other words, I do not recommend this ATC system if you have add-on airports you like and use often. But let's trust the developer who is certainly aware of this problem and who will perhaps (hopefully) correct this bug.
By far the best Atc program out there's in my opinion, I have used the others as well, but they are not anywhere near the level, and the performance is so much better then before. I can't wait for the future. Great vid.
Looks and sounds great!!!!
what is this video about, activesky, autofps, lossless scaling, frame generation
I think there was something about an ATC in there but I can't be sure.
@@doltBmB I don’t know, I thought I’d include something about ATC since it’s in the title
Why did they tell you to do the MCT transition? This only happends if their radar is broken in real world.
Do ATC give further climb clearance if traffic is clear or do they robotically adhear to SID STARS completely?
Do they give radar vectors or just keep you on the arrivals with no shortcuts? Can you request other type of approaches?
Can you request things or is it only possible to do the absolut standard stuff?
Do they correct you if you readback incorrect? Do they differ between Europe push start requests and US/CAN non-movement areas where push clearance is not required?
Do this program include ramp ATC control?
To be honest I'm not sure. I'm not familiar with real world procedures into Manchester.
It's possible to request specific approaches and transitions though. And direct to waypoints.
Readback is very flexible. You could e.g. say: "Manchester approach, good evening, Speebird 246 at 9700 feet descending to 6000 feet". Voice recognition keeps getting better and better.
You might want to ask these questions over at FSHud discord discord.gg/pr4mMQXU
@@captainpiett765 Ok thanks. Yea I am trying to make up my mind if Fshub or beyondATC is better/worth for the price. And no if ATC has radar coverage they always radar vector you unless the transition is direct into final. This is just a weird FSHUB feature which I don't why they use. Back in FSX the ATC could vector you for final. Seems like the ATC also just gave you climb as per the SID, not as per the traffic.
Hi , great video , I'm thinking about getting this and using it with aig, hows the performance compared to fsltl, and do the jetways connect to the AI traffic?
@@adrianosalomon1447 I think I’ll make a video with comparisons. Not sure about jetways, I’ll keep an eye out for that in my next flight
Hey Capt, you did not show it but does fshud show you how to get to gate on arrival like on departure
Yes it shows the taxi route on the map.
Hey man. I tried to record my flight yesterday with OBS, but after recording, the window of fshud is not showing in the video. Any idea why? Thanks . Damien
Do you mean the main app window? I've setup OBS so that it does a "display capture" ie everything on the display. I did have issues with sound though - couldn't find a separate audio channel for FSHud
Are the airline's parked at ther assigned terminals cause at jfk they allover the place wich they don't belong they parked at wrong terminals
I’m not sure as I haven’t been using FSHud that much. Maybe someone else knows
Hello Piett. Thank you fot this video. Do I need to uninstall the current vesion to try the alpha?
I think so since it's a separate build. That's what I did anyway
so how much is it ?
the sound quality is awful. It sounds like a 1940s radio. Is there any way to adjust that?
It's possible to turn down the background static. Can also adjust volumes for ATC and AI as well as adjust the speed
Nice video! How have you found the performance hit relative to something like FSLTL or Beyond ATC?
Thanks! There is less performance hit than v1. Overall I don't think the hit is too bad. Of course this depends on traffic settings. I might do a separate video with comparisons.
@@captainpiett765 Thanks. Would be very interested to see injection comparisons for FPS with BeyondATC and FSLTL. Thx.
65 is not good enough? The human eye can't see more than 40FPS. Little ridiculous.
…u can easily see the difference between 40 and 120😅
I think the main thing is to keep base (non-FG FPS) above 30 FPS, which I'll elaborate on in the next video :)
Sorry but that old wives tale was debunked many years ago ..............
I bought this ATC system for MSFS, and I have to say that I am not satisfied with how it works. The ATC voices are choppy and imprecise. Using the software on add-on airports is problematic because FSHUD does not recognize them. In other words, I do not recommend this ATC system if you have add-on airports you like and use often. But let's trust the developer who is certainly aware of this problem and who will perhaps (hopefully) correct this bug.