Since you unhinged freaks are getting your assholes in a twist over this vid, lemme say a few things: I fucking love the Richard Williams version, so much so I travelled all the way to London to watch a screening of it back in 2018 under a year before his death. I adore this film, I adore the work, the love and the thought that went into it. I hate the fact that it was butchered by American producers. I will never condone or defend what happened to the film. That does not mean that I cannot poke fun at or enjoy some of the content within the butchered versions of this film. If there is anything positive we can take away from these things it's the meme-worthy moments they gave us. I actually think Steve Lively is the saving grace for the Aussie version. Sure, it's not perfect and he deserved better material but he does bring a boyish warmth to the character that's vastly more pleasant to listen to than Matthew Broderick. This video was just a compilation of Lively's performance. I made it partly out of appreciation for his voice acting work, the character and because he does have some somewhat funny lines and animation when he speaks. It's a shitpost, it's not that fucking deep. Have a laugh, relax, enjoy the funni cobbler going brr.
This^ I agree with you 110%! I adore Richard Williams' original workprint, but I also enjoy "The Princess and the Cobbler" as a guilty pleasure. I don't love it over Williams' original work, but I do favor it a lot more than Miramax, for obvious reasons. Personally, I appreciate how "The Princess and the Cobbler" paid little odes to Williams' vision by keeping the thief silent, not adding nonsensical monologue for everything happening on screen, no pop culture references (especially to Aladdin), and yes, Tack talks here, but at least it's limited. Plus, I also love Steve Lively's voice! It is so soothing! He has a lot more emotion and care into his role than Matthew Broderick who plays Tack in monotone (he is just reading his lines, but who could blame him with the long monologue script they gave him?). I also appreciate "The Princess and the Cobbler" for having the voice actors of Tack and Yum Yum be both the speakers AND singers for a smoother transition to the musical numbers. Nothing against voice doubles! I just like it when there is a smooth transition with singers who sound similar to the voice actors, or vice versa. Steve Lively's singing coming out after Matthew Broderick is an odd transition. Thank you for this compilation!
The "a tack" pun was really neat, but I think I find the angle of him being a silent protagonist way more compelling for an experimental film like this.
I will admit that the voice suits him and the acting is perfect but Tack is way better being Mute because it adds so much mystery and Innocence to his character
and plus in the unfinished cut he said three words and his voice was deeper and it was so good! and it was so perfect that he spoke only at the wedding “and i, you”
He talks at the end of the original movie at the wedding scene. He removes his tac's to proudly say "I love you" to his wife, AND HE SAYS IT IN THE MOST DEEPEST SEXIEST VOICE BECAUSE THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME YOU HERE HIM SPEAK SO THE WHIPLASH HITS YOU RIGHT IN THE FEELS. Now its gone, now you get NOTHING
@@wegner7036 Agreed. I would’ve preferred a softer voice, like the one in this video.. it fits Tack so much better. I still prefer him being silent until the end, though.
Tack's voice its really sweet, but when he doesn't have a mouth and dont speak its a genius job. I could put that pretty voice just in the end of the movie in the wedding scene
His mouth designed by two tacks moving according to his mood was GENIUS. But then they had to ruin Richard William's work and make him talk... now those two tacks look useless in his mouth.
Chubby Cobbler Sure! He also says “I love you” to the princess in the end and that’s fine... but the choice of having him mute in the whole film was great and revolutionary at that time.
@@wonderdania there's a special version where some of the work print is shown and audio is readded and him talking isn't a thing ruclips.net/video/i6iiIKH3h44/видео.html
When I was watching the original version I kind of imagined him being hilariously sarcastic in his Thoughts without meaning it. Like for a example: (As he is cutting the jail bars) "When I get out of here I swear to god I am putting this leg iron on Zig Zags head and THEN we'll see who's so fuckin great "
Holy shit, his voice is actually really cute 🥺 Of course we know that him being silent is key but if he were to absolutely have a voice, I really do like this one the most.
Also whatever you do don’t look up Steve on the internet to ruin the illusion of Tack, I believe that newest image of him isn’t even him, looks way too old for a voice like his coming out of Tack, there was another image a while ago, but I’m not sure if it was even him either but looked a bit younger than the newest image…..
Is no one going to talk about how his skin went from extremely pale to tan throughout the movie maybe it's because he's been spending most of his time in the desert.
late reply but im p sure the darkening of his skin is bc before he goes on this big adventure he spends most of his time indoors-- ig its an artistic decision to show his character growth??
"Why can't I ever talk when it matters?" That sounds like a complaint the writers or the actor were throwing in at Hollywood for giving Tack a voice when he didn't really need one. The studios just don't like mute characters as heroes and they wasted Tack's breath on lines we didn't need to hear. We understand Tack well enough without his shy dialogue or narration and his last scene with Yum Yum was the only time where it felt like a nice way for him to break his silence.
@@tobbs5410 True. That voice by either Sean Connery or someone who tried to sound like him was out of place for Tack. Lively and Broderick both have more suitable voices.
Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron by Dreamworks is a cartoon with a mute animal as the main character that somehow got approved and did well in the box office. Beautiful movie, very boring for a kid to watch though.
Miramax destroyed him even more. He's tolerable by comparison in the Aussie version. The American may as well have slathered batter and fruit all over him and cut him into bite sized squares.
He was better when he said only the one line at the end of the movie and there was no narration. That’s in the version of this movie where there’s no music and it’s completely overtaken by beautiful animation (albeit around 5% incomplete)
Hot take: After hearing about the whole story, I saw the original version on here and then checked out this version (it's actually pretty enjoyable, feels more complete and not overly Disney-ish) and I actually CAN see Tack being selectively mute, only talking when important or comfortable with someone (Princess Yum-Yum for example!) This voice fits him better IMO. If ONLY if there was a way to seamlessly combine both versions in a way that respects Richard Williams's original vision and has something that everyone likes! My personal take: I'd cut out some of the narration and extra dialouge, the brigands' music number, add some of the original scenes that weren't included in the film and I think we've got something!
Someone needs to do that honestly, how has no one done this yet? Steve and Matthew’s Tack would be liked a lot more IF they put them only at the end like the original film…
I loved him being a mute. It showed the intelligence in his actions and how he could easily communicate his feelings with nothing but his expressions and some string. It was well thought out. Even with the design of tacs representing his mouth.
I feel like the only one who doesn't mind the version where tak talks. I think he sounds pretty cute. But i do feel bad that william's original idea of this movie was changed.
@@KeeperOfUntoldDreams He barely even does, doesn’t he? In fact, his only “good” characters are Ferris Bueller and Simba. Everyone else he plays is either insufferable or just plain boring. He may still have his looks, but looks are nothing if you barely have any talent.
@@bensdreamatorium8315 I keep forgetting that he was Ferris Bueller, that kind of makes his "work" as Tack look worse, because I have to wonder whose fault it is. Did he make the conscious choice to read Tack's every line (aloud or narrated) in the _exact same tone_ and nobody cared enough to say "maybe a little more emotion?" Or, did the director give him the motivation of, "well, you're alive, but, you're dead inside?"
Unpopular opinion I like tack when he speaks. I'll admit I think it's a bit cooler that the tacks are used as facial expressions. However, tack's voice fits him very well and in the original when he finally spoke, he sounded crazy why do you have to give that adorable man such a scary voice😂. But that's my opinion.
That voice in the original wasn’t the voice they were going to go with, that was just a stand in before they could find a proper voice actor. The original movie was still unfinished, you should know that from seeing it.
@@VOMITQUEEN It was hard for me to imagine the perfect voice for the perfect character. And here he is a perfect voice! How many times have I said the word "perfect"?
@@gachawife5769 As much as I like the original version of him (like Richard Williams intended him to be), honestly, I can't hate and LOVE Steve Lively's Tack here, I know it goes against him talking and everything, but CMON, he's really cute this way too, not to mention Steve fits the character SO MUCH BETTER, I think, than the original odd unexpected deep voice version of him in the original and the "Arabian Knight" version, like, I think people would hate these versions LESS, if someone fan edits both versions of the film to be like the original, BUT only have either Steve or Matthew's voice as Tack for the wedding scene, depending on whichever they like. :) (Also yeah, Yum Yum's original voice too, I'm not a fan of how her actress in this version delivered the "I love you..." line at the end compared to her original voice, it sounds off and weird sounding, swap that with the original as well, other than that though, I like her voice in this version. :) )
Having watched parts of the recobbled cut, out of curiosity and liking it, I’m personally kinda conflicted but still somewhat against the idea of having Tack speak when it was made pretty clear he was modeled by silent actors like Charlie Chaplin. Giving him a voice where it should be his body language like the tacks in his mouth to convey his personality makes him feel less unique in the film. However, Steve Lively does sound fitting for Tack, so maybe I can let it slide. It would’ve been better if you didn’t see Tack speak like in the chase scene.
While giving him a voice sorta ruins the point of the character, I will say that the actor they got doesn't sound bad and is actually pretty enjoyable.
Why does Tack go from literally black and white to actual skin tone? And why is the woman in the basket so much more fluid than the scenes of skin-tone Tack?
Tack’s skin darkening was intentional to show his character progression. He’s supposed to look “clown-like” at the start with his powder-white skin and cartoony proportions, and as the movie goes along he tans and is more realistically porportioned, like in his limbs and face shape. Also this movie is like the epitome of development hell some scenes will be animated way differently from others
@@TBP62 I forget where I heard/read it but I'm sure it was intentional, I doubt a character design could change that drastically and gradually otherwise
he only had one line in the original cut and it was "I love you" it was deep and manly which to me was very attractive but this voice suits him too considering he's a young boy. the Miramax version just massacred Tacks charm.
I'm in the camp where i hated Tack being voiced, but having Jonathan Winters be the Theif's inner voice actually improved the character for me? Like, having 2 mute characters was a bit much, and Winters really brought so much personality to the Thief scenes.
*OOF* I liked the fact that he never spoke. His emotions and intentions still rang out clear. It made the one and only time he actually spoke, THAT much more meaningful. 😫
0:55 - he sounds so mortified. Like, _"Was this in my mouth all this time?! What if I accidentally swallowed this while I was sleeping or whatever, I could've killed myself! Oh god!!"_
It’s understandable why many people hate this version of Tack as it goes against Richard’s original but… I love both versions! :) Obviously there’s no beating Richard’s original, but I just can’t hate Steve’s version of Tack either, his voice is so sweet for the character (honestly way better than Mathew), and when he sings as him ESPECIALLY (. as cheesy as the songs are)… 💖💖💖 AAH! My heart! (There has to be a way to get in touch with him and Bobbi page for them to remake and actually sing the full versions of “It’s So Amazing”, and “Am I Feeling Love” from the soundtrack version where those two other people sang them, that would be cool, and it’s probably possible, although probably not as Steve hasn’t done any work for the past 26 years, but I know that Bobbi still sings and stuff so hmmm… I’m not sure… Also whatever you do don’t look up Steve on the internet to ruin the illusion of Tack, I believe that newest image of him isn’t even him, looks way too old for a voice like his coming out of Tack, there was another image a while ago, but I’m not sure if it was even him either but looked a bit younger than the newest image…
I always imagine him to have this type of soft, boyish voice. So when I watched the recobbled version and heard his deep ass voice at the end I was disappointed. So happy to see this version!
In the version of this movie that I watched recently Tack only spoke once, when he said “And I love you” and his voice was so deep it seemed unreal to me and didn’t feel right. I much like this version of him better and find it so cute!! But either way I love him dearly
Кино
Since you unhinged freaks are getting your assholes in a twist over this vid, lemme say a few things:
I fucking love the Richard Williams version, so much so I travelled all the way to London to watch a screening of it back in 2018 under a year before his death. I adore this film, I adore the work, the love and the thought that went into it. I hate the fact that it was butchered by American producers. I will never condone or defend what happened to the film. That does not mean that I cannot poke fun at or enjoy some of the content within the butchered versions of this film. If there is anything positive we can take away from these things it's the meme-worthy moments they gave us.
I actually think Steve Lively is the saving grace for the Aussie version. Sure, it's not perfect and he deserved better material but he does bring a boyish warmth to the character that's vastly more pleasant to listen to than Matthew Broderick.
This video was just a compilation of Lively's performance. I made it partly out of appreciation for his voice acting work, the character and because he does have some somewhat funny lines and animation when he speaks.
It's a shitpost, it's not that fucking deep. Have a laugh, relax, enjoy the funni cobbler going brr.
Touch grass
@@GammaRoidGamma Take your own advice, kid.
@@tobbs5410 my apologies, I forgot all the grass was burned down in Aussieland
@@GammaRoidGamma Except I'm not 'Stralian. 🤷
This^ I agree with you 110%! I adore Richard Williams' original workprint, but I also enjoy "The Princess and the Cobbler" as a guilty pleasure. I don't love it over Williams' original work, but I do favor it a lot more than Miramax, for obvious reasons.
Personally, I appreciate how "The Princess and the Cobbler" paid little odes to Williams' vision by keeping the thief silent, not adding nonsensical monologue for everything happening on screen, no pop culture references (especially to Aladdin), and yes, Tack talks here, but at least it's limited. Plus, I also love Steve Lively's voice! It is so soothing! He has a lot more emotion and care into his role than Matthew Broderick who plays Tack in monotone (he is just reading his lines, but who could blame him with the long monologue script they gave him?).
I also appreciate "The Princess and the Cobbler" for having the voice actors of Tack and Yum Yum be both the speakers AND singers for a smoother transition to the musical numbers. Nothing against voice doubles! I just like it when there is a smooth transition with singers who sound similar to the voice actors, or vice versa. Steve Lively's singing coming out after Matthew Broderick is an odd transition.
Thank you for this compilation!
"This is a perfect voice for Tack" and "Tack shouldn't speak" aren't conflicting statements, imo. Both are very true.
I feel like they should have used this for his original last line "And I love you"
What if his dialogue was limited?
The "a tack" pun was really neat, but I think I find the angle of him being a silent protagonist way more compelling for an experimental film like this.
Nah i want my Sean Connery to voice him
His original voice in the ending was kinda creepy. This actor is a definitely a better fit if this character is to speak at all
I will admit that the voice suits him and the acting is perfect but Tack is way better being Mute because it adds so much mystery and Innocence to his character
Not to mention the "I love you" in the end sounded that much impactful when he was mute
Ong
@@stevepensando2593 Lol ,
😅
“Innocence” oh brother he ain’t a kid
@@darkx6869 no one said he is☠
While people are warring over how Tack should be mute or not, I’m here just enjoying Lively’s voice. Im a sucker for soft male voices 🥰
Same 🫠
Same 🥰
he has a cute voice 😍
same here. I like soft voice tack AND mute tack
Oh boy me too..
Personally I like where he doesn't talk until the end when he married Princess Yum Yum
Yeah ❤️ that was the best version
Agreed it feels like a payoff
Honestly I coulda gone for him saying it with his thread more. I only watched the re-cobnled cut and Him talking at all felt off
@AT Productions yeah.
yeah its pretty cool when he turns brown too
The character is so much more fascinating MUTE. It's the original Williams's idea for him and it works!
Right hearing him talk at the end when he never speaks is so much better
Fax
I like the detail of the one (sometimes two) tacks in his mouth representing his mouth
and plus in the unfinished cut he said three words and his voice was deeper and it was so good! and it was so perfect that he spoke only at the wedding “and i, you”
I like the way he used the tacks in his mouth to display emotion.
He talks at the end of the original movie at the wedding scene. He removes his tac's to proudly say "I love you" to his wife, AND HE SAYS IT IN THE MOST DEEPEST SEXIEST VOICE BECAUSE THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME YOU HERE HIM SPEAK SO THE WHIPLASH HITS YOU RIGHT IN THE FEELS. Now its gone, now you get NOTHING
I watched the recobbled cut and found that scene to be remarkably unsettling.
@@wegner7036
Agreed. I would’ve preferred a softer voice, like the one in this video.. it fits Tack so much better. I still prefer him being silent until the end, though.
@@wegner7036 wow wtf?
@@wegner7036 Top 10 movie jumpscares
What's that edit called?
Tack's voice its really sweet, but when he doesn't have a mouth and dont speak its a genius job. I could put that pretty voice just in the end of the movie in the wedding scene
Yea, is not actor's fault, but productor's
I prefer this voice to the deep one he has in the Recobbled Cut (he speaks right at the end of the film).
His mouth designed by two tacks moving according to his mood was GENIUS. But then they had to ruin Richard William's work and make him talk... now those two tacks look useless in his mouth.
You can actually see he has a mouth later on in Williams' version of the film, first where the witch gives him advice.
Chubby Cobbler Sure! He also says “I love you” to the princess in the end and that’s fine... but the choice of having him mute in the whole film was great and revolutionary at that time.
@@wonderdania there's a special version where some of the work print is shown and audio is readded and him talking isn't a thing ruclips.net/video/i6iiIKH3h44/видео.html
Si no te gusta no mires 🤪
@@leahuwu9950 creo que necesito mirar a todos animaciones, buenos o malos son…gracias.
Tack without a voice makes me imagine him just constantly having the most chaotic thoughts at all times. Keeps me engaged. Who knows what he’s up to
When I was watching the original version I kind of imagined him being hilariously sarcastic in his Thoughts without meaning it. Like for a example:
(As he is cutting the jail bars)
"When I get out of here I swear to god I am putting this leg iron on Zig Zags head and THEN we'll see who's so fuckin great "
Holy shit, his voice is actually really cute 🥺 Of course we know that him being silent is key but if he were to absolutely have a voice, I really do like this one the most.
Also whatever you do don’t look up Steve on the internet to ruin the illusion of Tack, I believe that newest image of him isn’t even him, looks way too old for a voice like his coming out of Tack, there was another image a while ago, but I’m not sure if it was even him either but looked a bit younger than the newest image…..
*"wHo NeeDS A gEnIe WhEn YoU hAvE A tAcK"*
I swear the Miramax is just a meme while the original is a work of art
These clips ain't from the Miramax version
Yeah. They’re from the Calvert version.
Is no one going to talk about how his skin went from extremely pale to tan throughout the movie maybe it's because he's been spending most of his time in the desert.
From pale as a vampire to dark as Aladdin. The Miracle of Transformation
late reply but im p sure the darkening of his skin is bc before he goes on this big adventure he spends most of his time indoors-- ig its an artistic decision to show his character growth??
The movie transitions from peacock to netflix
Can’t believe my favorite character the gock cobbler would wear blackface like this
@@chistosquisto9079 Been thinking about this comment all morning
Knowing the original movie, this hurts
If you think this voice is bad then you clearly haven't heard what Tack sounds like in the Recobbled cut
where can i find the original movie
"Why can't I ever talk when it matters?" That sounds like a complaint the writers or the actor were throwing in at Hollywood for giving Tack a voice when he didn't really need one. The studios just don't like mute characters as heroes and they wasted Tack's breath on lines we didn't need to hear. We understand Tack well enough without his shy dialogue or narration and his last scene with Yum Yum was the only time where it felt like a nice way for him to break his silence.
I agree, although Lively has a much cuter voice than the anonymous baritone that provided us with that jumpscare in the original.
@@tobbs5410 True. That voice by either Sean Connery or someone who tried to sound like him was out of place for Tack. Lively and Broderick both have more suitable voices.
He could say this for every quotes he says
@@tobbs5410 I’d rather hear Matthew Broderick as the voice of adult Simba than this.
Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron by Dreamworks is a cartoon with a mute animal as the main character that somehow got approved and did well in the box office. Beautiful movie, very boring for a kid to watch though.
Oh how they massacred my boy.
Miramax destroyed him even more. He's tolerable by comparison in the Aussie version. The American may as well have slathered batter and fruit all over him and cut him into bite sized squares.
@@gianlucacolangelo6578 The Recobbled, workprint and directors cut have been available in English for years, so no.
@@gianlucacolangelo6578 Actually no
He was better when he said only the one line at the end of the movie and there was no narration. That’s in the version of this movie where there’s no music and it’s completely overtaken by beautiful animation (albeit around 5% incomplete)
@@abbypetit2167 exactly
Hot take: After hearing about the whole story, I saw the original version on here and then checked out this version (it's actually pretty enjoyable, feels more complete and not overly Disney-ish) and I actually CAN see Tack being selectively mute, only talking when important or comfortable with someone (Princess Yum-Yum for example!) This voice fits him better IMO.
If ONLY if there was a way to seamlessly combine both versions in a way that respects Richard Williams's original vision and has something that everyone likes!
My personal take: I'd cut out some of the narration and extra dialouge, the brigands' music number, add some of the original scenes that weren't included in the film and I think we've got something!
Same, i like both versións
Someone needs to do that honestly, how has no one done this yet? Steve and Matthew’s Tack would be liked a lot more IF they put them only at the end like the original film…
nOt The SCHOOOOOO!!!!!!
0:29 WOAHAWOAHAWOAHAAAWOOOOAAAHHHHHH
Shoe*
I watched the recobbled version and I didn't know he talks
He does in all versions but to differing extents.
@@tobbs5410 where can i find this version on youtube?
@@wiggins9249 ruclips.net/video/zU1KQzpJ0jg/видео.html
@@tobbs5410 ok thanks
He doesn't except in the final scene. The added talking is just... "added".. it was not the original plan
I love how he just flat out changes into a different character model at the end.
For real! His posture changed, his facial shape changed and his skin complexion changed lol
I loved him being a mute. It showed the intelligence in his actions and how he could easily communicate his feelings with nothing but his expressions and some string. It was well thought out. Even with the design of tacs representing his mouth.
This shows how little faith executives had in the audience back then. Even today, this still holds true
Even though everyone including myself agrees he’s better off as mute, I can’t help but enjoy hearing him talk, the voice suits him in my opinion!
That's the worst part! It's a genuinely good performance which fits the character really well. It's just that we know how he should be
does anyone know where i can watch the version of him mute only saying i love you at the end?
@@serachameio I think found that one on a channel called "TheThiefArchive" yesterday. It's on RUclips.
tack is best boi
He is
yes
Fact
This is exactly how I imagined him sounding???
Watch the work print and you'll fall out of your seat. His voice there is unfittingly deep.
@@tobbs5410 if only it was replaced with a voice more like this, it would be perfect
I understand why people don't like Tack talking, but at least he sounds nice.
I feel like the only one who doesn't mind the version where tak talks. I think he sounds pretty cute. But i do feel bad that william's original idea of this movie was changed.
I’ll say this, as much as it pisses all over the original film having Tack talk, this voice is SO MUCH better than Matthew Broderick.
Yeah, in comparison to this voice, it sounded like Matthew Broderick wasn't even trying, like he didn't wanna be there.
@@KeeperOfUntoldDreams He barely even does, doesn’t he? In fact, his only “good” characters are Ferris Bueller and Simba. Everyone else he plays is either insufferable or just plain boring. He may still have his looks, but looks are nothing if you barely have any talent.
@@bensdreamatorium8315 I keep forgetting that he was Ferris Bueller, that kind of makes his "work" as Tack look worse, because I have to wonder whose fault it is. Did he make the conscious choice to read Tack's every line (aloud or narrated) in the _exact same tone_ and nobody cared enough to say "maybe a little more emotion?" Or, did the director give him the motivation of, "well, you're alive, but, you're dead inside?"
@@KeeperOfUntoldDreams He's like that in almost every movie that features him. So it's probably his own fault for becoming so big-headed with fame.
@@bensdreamatorium8315 I now no longer feel bad for not seeing more of his movies.
Mute or not, he is cute as hell ☺️
Let's protect him!
They had some nerve editing in a mouth where there wasn’t one 🤨
Well, I mean, even in the original work print he has a mouth towards the end.
... Maybe his lack of a mouth explains why he's so emaciated?
Unpopular opinion I like tack when he speaks. I'll admit I think it's a bit cooler that the tacks are used as facial expressions. However, tack's voice fits him very well and in the original when he finally spoke, he sounded crazy why do you have to give that adorable man such a scary voice😂. But that's my opinion.
That voice in the original wasn’t the voice they were going to go with, that was just a stand in before they could find a proper voice actor. The original movie was still unfinished, you should know that from seeing it.
HIS VOICE IS THE CUTEST I'M GONNA DIE
This is actually a perfect voice for him
While the original vision of the film is much better, this is exactly how I pictured Tack’s voice would sound like
@@VOMITQUEEN It was hard for me to imagine the perfect voice for the perfect character. And here he is a perfect voice! How many times have I said the word "perfect"?
@@gachawife5769 As much as I like the original version of him (like Richard Williams intended him to be), honestly, I can't hate and LOVE Steve Lively's Tack here, I know it goes against him talking and everything, but CMON, he's really cute this way too, not to mention Steve fits the character SO MUCH BETTER, I think, than the original odd unexpected deep voice version of him in the original and the "Arabian Knight" version, like, I think people would hate these versions LESS, if someone fan edits both versions of the film to be like the original, BUT only have either Steve or Matthew's voice as Tack for the wedding scene, depending on whichever they like. :) (Also yeah, Yum Yum's original voice too, I'm not a fan of how her actress in this version delivered the "I love you..." line at the end compared to her original voice, it sounds off and weird sounding, swap that with the original as well, other than that though, I like her voice in this version. :) )
Ikr!!
I for one think his voice is very cute, my compliments to the VA 👍🏻
"WHY CANT I EVER TALK WHEN IT MATTERS" IM IN LOVE OH NO
Fun fact: In the original Mute Tack version, at the end of the film where Tack says "I love you" he was going to have a deep voice
oh, he does! there is a youtube video of the original where he doesn't speak until the i love you :)
I think that was just a stand in voice before they could find a proper voice actor for him. The original movie was still unfinished, after all.
He was cuter as a mute. Eh, even so, the voice is fitting.
Having watched parts of the recobbled cut, out of curiosity and liking it, I’m personally kinda conflicted but still somewhat against the idea of having Tack speak when it was made pretty clear he was modeled by silent actors like Charlie Chaplin. Giving him a voice where it should be his body language like the tacks in his mouth to convey his personality makes him feel less unique in the film.
However, Steve Lively does sound fitting for Tack, so maybe I can let it slide. It would’ve been better if you didn’t see Tack speak like in the chase scene.
I think I prefer him only having the one "and I love you too" because I think its a cute scene and doesn't take away from the character
THIS IS NOT STEVE LIVELYS VOICE
Steve Lively’s portrayal of Tack makes him sound like Jason Griffith. And I kind of like it.
My heart melts every time he speaks
While giving him a voice sorta ruins the point of the character, I will say that the actor they got doesn't sound bad and is actually pretty enjoyable.
Why does Tack go from literally black and white to actual skin tone? And why is the woman in the basket so much more fluid than the scenes of skin-tone Tack?
Tack’s skin darkening was intentional to show his character progression. He’s supposed to look “clown-like” at the start with his powder-white skin and cartoony proportions, and as the movie goes along he tans and is more realistically porportioned, like in his limbs and face shape. Also this movie is like the epitome of development hell some scenes will be animated way differently from others
@@tiablue9106 i thought he was white at the beginning because the creators didn’t have a clear design for him until halfway through the film
although even if it was it still unintentionally gives the illusion of character development, even if there isn’t any
@@TBP62 I forget where I heard/read it but I'm sure it was intentional, I doubt a character design could change that drastically and gradually otherwise
I thought he got tan in the desert journey tbh
I do prefer this voice over the overly deep one at the end of the movie
I love this movie no matter what! Tack was a big cartoon crush of mine! 😍
he only had one line in the original cut and it was "I love you" it was deep and manly which to me was very attractive but this voice suits him too considering he's a young boy. the Miramax version just massacred Tacks charm.
little silly, the skrunckly, the spoingy, the baby. I love him
I think Tack voice is really great 👍
yes amazing
Better than the Miramax cut
That’s the voice of Matthew Broderick.
And Matthew Broderick was also the voice of Adam in Dreamworks animated film, Bee Movie.
I like both the talk and no talking. Both fit him very well and speak about his character.
0:12 and the wedding line should have been his ONLY lines. Those two lines actually have meaning to his character
Gonna be honest, I'll take this over Matthew Broderick's voice
What’s wrong with Matthew?
@@theempireeofficial3935 Simply put, he may be a prominent name in the film industry, but he often lacks the passion and emotion of a true actor.
The talking only really works for him at the end of the movie. Feels more special that way
Tack's freaking adorable whether he speaks or not
He is SO *CUTE* !
marco ciabattino
marco ciabattino
"Io ti amo"
This voice but hes only allowed to say his last line from the movie
Perfect.
I'll take this voice over the Arabian Night version any day.
0:51 idk why but this made me laugh-
I was expecting Mathew Broderick’s voice, but this is way better. Also, the original mute version is the best one.
I like tack with AND without a voice. Either way it suits him. I've watched both versions of this and like them equally!
I prefer him not talking but I love this voice so much, especially compared to his voice at the end of the original. This fits him much better.
It's been years but I still love this boy with my whole heart
I only like it when he doesn’t talk throughout the movie but I like the voice at the end when he talks
Exactly, 😏hmmm 😊😜👌😅
Imagine voicing a character only for the team to say last minute, “we decided to make him mute”.
This is the opposite of what happened.
I've never seen so many people get so angry at someone speaking
You haven't heard of the Tom and Jerry movie, then.
I always loved both versions. I think my BIGGEST gripe with this version, is the thief's inner monologue we would hear. I like him as a silent a-hole.
*It's Tacking time!*
😏😏😏🤤🤤🤣😸😊 👌 preppare your ass.....
@@Randomstuff33688 hahahahaha whaaaa
"NOT THE SHOE" 😭😭 idk why that was so funny
It doesn't matter if he talks or not, he's adorable and we all love 'em.
I'm in the camp where i hated Tack being voiced, but having Jonathan Winters be the Theif's inner voice actually improved the character for me? Like, having 2 mute characters was a bit much, and Winters really brought so much personality to the Thief scenes.
"Why can't I ever talk when it matters?" I relate to this in a spiritual level
now while i do think him being mute is a good character choice, i do think his voice is very fitting for him
Bro went through 5 different skin tones in one movie.
I really love him
Same.
*OOF* I liked the fact that he never spoke. His emotions and intentions still rang out clear. It made the one and only time he actually spoke, THAT much more meaningful. 😫
But this voice fits Tack perfectly
Glad to see others simp for this bleached lad
I simp for him. He's adorable
God I thought I was the only one, glad I'm not alone :,)
He is a even bigger sweet baby when he speaks
I just love h so much oh my gosh.
Tack: Why can I ever talk when it matters Nostalgia Critic: You can say that for all the lines in this movie
They're worse mistake was trying to turn this into a Disney film
i dont know if that peach cobbler boy saying a tack or attack
Both, really. It's a pun.
That He's A Cutest Tack Ever
0:55 - he sounds so mortified. Like, _"Was this in my mouth all this time?! What if I accidentally swallowed this while I was sleeping or whatever, I could've killed myself! Oh god!!"_
Tack is one of the most adorable characters I've seen in a cartoon
Oh the beauty of Richard Williams and his drawing on 1s
Poor guy, giving his best with what he had then replaced by Simba who did an even WORSE job.
Uh, Correction. Matthew Broderick did an even worse job voicing Tack.
... Am I the only one who thinks that Tack looks SLIGHTLY better when he's speaking?
That's because the scenes where he's talking were done by Fred Calvert's team. The rest of them were animated by Richard Williams
I just want this voice to be his voice during the wedding scene
The character is no doubt more fascinating as the preferable mute version, so regardless, giving him a voice was going to be...
a Tacky move.😎
I see what you did there
It’s understandable why many people hate this version of Tack as it goes against Richard’s original but…
I love both versions! :)
Obviously there’s no beating Richard’s original, but I just can’t hate Steve’s version of Tack either, his voice is so sweet for the character (honestly way better than Mathew), and when he sings as him ESPECIALLY (. as cheesy as the songs are)… 💖💖💖 AAH! My heart! (There has to be a way to get in touch with him and Bobbi page for them to remake and actually sing the full versions of “It’s So Amazing”, and “Am I Feeling Love” from the soundtrack version where those two other people sang them, that would be cool, and it’s probably possible, although probably not as Steve hasn’t done any work for the past 26 years, but I know that Bobbi still sings and stuff so hmmm… I’m not sure…
Also whatever you do don’t look up Steve on the internet to ruin the illusion of Tack, I believe that newest image of him isn’t even him, looks way too old for a voice like his coming out of Tack, there was another image a while ago, but I’m not sure if it was even him either but looked a bit younger than the newest image…
His voice is so nice to listen to 😊
My childhood crush
Cobbler’s confidence enhanced his Melanin.
Steve Lively is kinda underrated.
Matthew Broderick should go hide under a rock before the cult of Miramax haters come after him lol.
Mute or being able to Speak, both will still be able to make me go: “Awhh”
I always imagine him to have this type of soft, boyish voice. So when I watched the recobbled version and heard his deep ass voice at the end I was disappointed. So happy to see this version!
I do wish for a new movie just like this animations
Tack is a cute and handsome man.
Though I personally prefer him being mute, if he had to have any voice I’d definitely choose this one! He’s so adorable I just fjdgfjhfj
Tack at the beginning: 👦🏻
Tack at the end: 👦🏿
I just found out about tack and now I love him-
Beautiful voice! But did he need it? And to be honest, such a voice acting perfect for him 1001%.
He didn't need it whatsoever, but it's a pleasant voice nonetheless, so I'm okay with it.
The voice actor also voiced adult Simba
Really? I didn’t know that.
@@tongaofaMatthew broderick voiced him? I dont think so
In the version of this movie that I watched recently Tack only spoke once, when he said “And I love you” and his voice was so deep it seemed unreal to me and didn’t feel right. I much like this version of him better and find it so cute!! But either way I love him dearly
I love this voice so much