i was going for a sony a6700 but it's an extremely limited camera (for which it's small size is definitely not an excuse for Sony making it just a glorified camcorder and not what it truly is, a stills camera). I decided i am going for the Sony A7Rm3 because I want the flexibility to shoot both APS-C and Full frame mode without losing too much detail depending on whether I want to shoot long distance or landscape with an LA-EA5 adapter and my old Minolta lenses plus the dt 16-50 SSM that came with the a77ii. A7m4 has a neat display but even yet it's still a lot worse than the a77m2/a99m2's massive 360 degree screen which is something that Sony could have perfectly made too. The A7R3 costs LESS than the A6700 in my country and it has all I need: a huge viewfinder and a non restricted full mechanical shutter and sadly neither the a7c series nor the a6000 series offer it. My idea to cope around the lack of tilt screen on a7r3 would be carrying a mirror on the left hand while i shoot with the right hand, but now i'm realizing i rarely use the flip screen unless i'm taking a selfie or i'm doing street photography which I completely loathe if i don't use the 80-200gm from Minolta.
There are some good gadgets to get around the A7iii lack of an articulated display. You can also use the Imaging Edge app to connect to and remotely shoot that was. A monitor is a good idea if it was mainly for video but for my it’s a bit bulky for shooting stills with that on the camera as well.
@@pedalophotography no need for gadgets, why spend more money? Also, I forgot that the A7 cameras before the A6700 and A7C don't support LA-EA5 either so I can't go with them. La-ea4 doesn't let you use the camera's AF, and it only has five af points in the center.
The A7iii is fully frame which is a plus. However the A6700 has 10 bit colour as opposed to the A7iii having 8 bit. The A6700 shoots higher frames per second in 4K as well. My A7iii was mainly used for photography though with a bit of video work sometimes. For what you get for the price the A7iii is a great choice even with the A6700 having better video specs
Just got an A7iii and am really loving it. Takes superb pics and once you zone in on good picture settings the video quality is just out of sight.
Yeah it’s a great camera. I’m really happy with mine. Photos are great and the video quality is really good. Definitely recommend it.
Where are these prices coming from? Brand new they're only now £999 with black friday. And a used tamron 28-75 is £400 - £500 depending on condition?
Great content, really like your delivery of information.
Thanks mate. I really enjoyed this one.
great video, thank you
Glad you liked it!
Love it!
Thank you mate
im using A7III and FX3. A73 is still good for photography :D
Absolutely. I love it as a second camera when shooting at festivals etc. great back up.
i was going for a sony a6700 but it's an extremely limited camera (for which it's small size is definitely not an excuse for Sony making it just a glorified camcorder and not what it truly is, a stills camera). I decided i am going for the Sony A7Rm3 because I want the flexibility to shoot both APS-C and Full frame mode without losing too much detail depending on whether I want to shoot long distance or landscape with an LA-EA5 adapter and my old Minolta lenses plus the dt 16-50 SSM that came with the a77ii. A7m4 has a neat display but even yet it's still a lot worse than the a77m2/a99m2's massive 360 degree screen which is something that Sony could have perfectly made too.
The A7R3 costs LESS than the A6700 in my country and it has all I need: a huge viewfinder and a non restricted full mechanical shutter and sadly neither the a7c series nor the a6000 series offer it.
My idea to cope around the lack of tilt screen on a7r3 would be carrying a mirror on the left hand while i shoot with the right hand, but now i'm realizing i rarely use the flip screen unless i'm taking a selfie or i'm doing street photography which I completely loathe if i don't use the 80-200gm from Minolta.
There are some good gadgets to get around the A7iii lack of an articulated display. You can also use the Imaging Edge app to connect to and remotely shoot that was. A monitor is a good idea if it was mainly for video but for my it’s a bit bulky for shooting stills with that on the camera as well.
@@pedalophotography no need for gadgets, why spend more money? Also, I forgot that the A7 cameras before the A6700 and A7C don't support LA-EA5 either so I can't go with them. La-ea4 doesn't let you use the camera's AF, and it only has five af points in the center.
Solid
Thank you
The a7iii or 6700?
The A7iii is fully frame which is a plus. However the A6700 has 10 bit colour as opposed to the A7iii having 8 bit. The A6700 shoots higher frames per second in 4K as well. My A7iii was mainly used for photography though with a bit of video work sometimes. For what you get for the price the A7iii is a great choice even with the A6700 having better video specs
Does it overheat?
Not that I’ve experienced. My A7IV does occasionally however.