I was a Christian and a Filipino, now I study Judaism. Judaism, the original faith of monotheism must be the true religion. Therefore I said to myself, to know more of Hashem is by meditating Judaism's teachings. I don't read the new testaments anymore it is quite inconsistent from what the prophets prophecy about the messiah.
Study Islam because it's keeps the laws of the moses and the Tanak and believes in the messiah who will descend to earth 40 years before the day of judgement.
marife salih Judaism as I said is the true religion. Their God is the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus is not the messiah. The messiah is yet to come and when he comes it will be the last judgment. I respect Islam though for they believe only in one God. The new testament attached with the old is full of idolatrous teachings. It comes from the Romans and it is evil.
+armando how According to this law, do you have comprehensive penal laws, ceremonial laws, dietary laws (details how to conduct prayers in a house of worship, wedding, funerals, etc.), in other words, a complete guidance? Or is it you take something here, something there? (this is a sincere question) You see, the Christians of today, the only prayer that I know of that Christians do that can be traced to Jesus is the Lord's Prayer. Go to any church today, every one is different, some singing, some dancing, jumping up and down, with piano, electric guitars and drums. All these cannot be traced to Jesus. For Muslims, the Qur'an is the general instructions and the Hadith, the details. As an example, the Qur'an instructs as to do prayers in general terms only. The hadith give the details of how to do it (what to say, postures, times of prayers, etc). And the Prophet also warned us against doing innovations in the matters of religion. So, we cannot invent modes of prayers.
Amazing. The answers are there! How can people claim to believe when they have no knowledge of these scriptures? Haha. Thanks rabbi for helping me understand. From Scotland here 🏴 cheers
@@serniebanders2858 and ISAIA53 is not about Yeshuah it is about someone else ofcourse lol🤧 but they are brainwashed by a ritualistic cult most of it added by various men barmitsvah,tallit,holidays not recorded in the Torah but they pay more attention to those books added- Babylon talmud ,kabbalah ,zohra. They even revered a complete charlatan as messiah in1666 called sabatai tsevi who denounced his own Judaism throwing his hat on the floor and stamping on it!"Ye shall know them by their fruits."Matt7:15 anyone but Yeshuah why? because He was the only begotten Son of God sent to die for our inherent sins in this wicked world to redeem us from our self righteousness,racial superiority, greed,immorality,lies,hatred,serving self over others for the flesh is weak and cannot be reconciled back to God without atonement through Yeshuah the passover lamb Amen🙏checkout- 'streetministries seven' on youtube Baruch Haba Hashem Adonai👑🕯🕊🙌🔥🦁🙏
Tovia Singer, I have some questions regarding the dates you are getting on your prophecy timeline that you are showing at 11:31 in the video. Assuming that creation started at 3761 BC, you have dated the destruction of the first temple to 423 BC (3338). You have also dated the decree that Cyrus gave to the Israelites to 370 BC (3391). If I add 490 years to the get the date of the destruction of the second temple, I get about 66 to 67 AD (3828/9). If I am interpreting this diagram right, there are some chronological issues that come up. For instance, every Ancient Near East (ANE) scholar I know will date the destruction of the first temple to 586 BC (3175/3176) and the potential decree of Cyrus to around 535 to 539 BC (3222 to 3226). How does about 160 years of history just disappear like that? What sources have you used to come to that conclusion? I know you do not like the greek historians that much (Herodotus, Xenophon, Ctesias). Are you merely getting the dates of the fall of Babylon just from subtracting 490 years from the fall of the second temple? If that is the case, then there are serious methodological problems in your chronological reconstruction.
Bensperry, Tovia use rabbinic chronology named "Seder Olam" from II century CE, wrong chronology which is created in order to support rabinical anti-christian interpretation of prophecies. You are right about Your observation about wrong chronology.
I wondered about this prophecy and it fit tied more into the destruction of the temple and not Jesus so thank you for showing me this. I don’t think it messes with Christianity at all but it definitely shows how the old covenant ended in AD70 which actually ties into something I’ve already believed, but this helps me put that together a lot better.
✝️ JESUS IS THE MESSIAH THAT DANIEL PROPHESIED ✝️ The Messiah had to have come in Daniel Week 69, that was in the days of Rome, for the Prince Messiah of Week 69 is also the Prince of the Covenant (who brought the New Covenant) of Daniel 11:22 and is the same Prince of Princes (the Son of Man of Daniel 7, who will reign over the kingdoms of the World) of Daniel 8, and the one against him is Rome, the same one described in Week 69 that would bring down the City and the Temple (70 A.D). Some want to say that these events did not occur at the time of Rome, and that he is talking about some Seleucid King, but Daniel 8:23 clearly explains that this character arises after the fall of the 4 Kingdoms of Greece (that is, he arises after the fall of the Seleucids, so he cannot be Antiochus)...this is Rome, who became an empire (27 BC) when the last Kingdom, the Ptolemies, was conquered by Rome. What does all this mean then?...that Jesus was the wounded Messiah prophesied by Daniel, and that anyone claiming to be the Messiah after that date can no longer be considered Messiah, for the prophetic time has already passed, it would be too late...only Jesus fulfilled that prophecy at the exact time, and then the City and the Temple fell as Daniel said Daniel's prophecy stopped when the City and Temple fell, this is because the prophecy of the 70 Weeks is for the People of Israel and the Holy City (Daniel 9:24), and at present Jerusalem is not fully theirs.... When the City is theirs, and the False Messiah appears, the revival of Rome with a New Herod posing as King of the Jews, making covenant with many, then the 70th Week will begin (the beginning of the events described in Daniel 11:23).... he in the middle of the Week will Reign for 3 and a half years, persecute the Understood of these prophecies, seek the removal of the New Covenant of the lamb from the hearts of those who are God's Temple, and bring Apostasy, exalting himself above all, as if he were God, thus bringing spiritual perdition, and will make alliance with 10 Kings...Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia will fall under his power...and he will return to Jerusalem with armies This False Messiah is the Little Horn of Daniel 7 and its 10 horns, coming out of the 4th Beast/Rome, and is also the feet of Iron mixed with clay (Iron/Rome, as the Iron of the Legs, resurfaces, making alliances with the 10 toes/Kings) But in those days of Great Tribulation will return the Nazarene, the True Messiah, from where he ascended, from the East, from the Mount of Olives, and will defeat those Kings of the False Messiah/Gog, when he is surrounding Jerusalem with his armies....for in the last days the sealed Book of Daniel will be opened, and the kingdoms of the World and Jerusalem will accept with lamentation the Pierced One and his New Covenant, because they will understand these prophecies of Daniel to be fulfilled, being cleansed, made white and Purified through the New Covenant....
Nothing you stated refutes Tovias argument. Can you show me where the New Testemant references Daniel 9 prophecy? If not then the Gospel writers could not read Hebrew or they knew it wasn't about Jesus
@@lessthansionYes, it does... besides, the Nazarene was already speaking of that prophecy, how he would be rejected and wounded, and how the temple and the city would fall, as Daniel 9 says
♦ If Cyrus is Messiah and shepherd and Jesus is not then Cyrus should be the one to come at the end of days and restore peace to the world. That means Cyrus has a second coming ....... but wait ..... the shepherd comes from the house of David. _[23] I will appoint over them one shepherd, My servant David, and he will feed them. He will feed them and be their shepherd. [24] I, the LORD, will be their God, and My servant David will be a prince among them. I, the LORD, have spoken._ (Ezekiel 34:23-24) Tovia has created a problem for himself with his interpretation but if you've seen more recent vids he's lost some of that gut. He must have had a chauffeur or his wife drove because he wouldn't get that gut behind the steering wheel.
finally a Jewish brother is helping us to let this christiens know their religion is from Paul it fake if you die believing a man is a god you going to hell.
I always wonder why people say "Judeo-chrisitan" when Jews believe in only the One true God of Abraham. While the church teaches the worship of trinity.
I think that's a little silly that just because that a just, loving god is going to send a sincere Christian to be tortured and choking and screaming in hell fire because he or she was a little misled. Where in the Torah does it teach a literal hell? I thought it was sheol or the grave and after the fall, man's curse was aging and dying and being asleep in the grave.
amadou camara the unforgivable sin is not believing in the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit of course we are to love the Jews Judaism for God Yahweh gives van strong delusion
There is no such thing as hell in the Hebrew Bible. Jews in the ancient world did not believe in an immortal soul that lives on after death. If you only consider the Old Testament to be God's word then there is no basis for believing in a hell.
1. The entire prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 covers a period of “seventy weeks.” This period applies to one complete, sequential block of time. This prophecy would start during the Persian period and would end during the time of the Messiah. 2. Logic requires that the 70th week follow immediately after the 69th week. If it does not, then it cannot properly be called the 70th week! 3. It is illogical to insert a 2,000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. No hint of this gap is found in the prophecy itself. There is no gap between the first 7 weeks and the following 62 weeks. Why insert one between the 69th and the 70th week? 4. Daniel 9:27 says nothing about a seven-year period of tribulation, or about any Antichrist 5. The focus of this prophecy is the Messiah, not the Antichrist. Modern interpreters have applied “the people of the prince” who would come to “destroy the city and the sanctuary” (verse 26) to the Antichrist. Yet the text does not say this. In the past, that sentence has been applied to the Romans, who under Prince Titus did “destroy the city and the sanctuary” in'‘A.D. 70 6. “He shall confirm the covenant.” Jesus Christ came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.” Romans 15:8. Nowhere in the Bible is Antichrist ever said to make or confirm a covenant with anyone! The word “covenant” always applies to the Messiah, never to the Antichrist! 7. “He shall confirm the covenant with many.” Jesus said, “This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” Matthew 26:28. Jesus used the same words, because He knew that He was fulfilling Daniel 9:27! 8. “In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” The 70th week was from A.D. 27 to 34. After three and a half years of ministry, Christ died in A.D. 31, “in the midst [middle] of the week.” At the moment of His death, “the veil of the temple was rent [torn] in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matthew 27. The Great Sacrifice had been offered! 9. “For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.” Jesus plainly applied this “abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet” (Matthew 24:15) to the time when His followers were to flee from Jerusalem before the destruction of the second temple in A.D. 70. Jesus told His 12 disciples, “When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies [the Roman armies led by Prince Titus], then know that its desolation is near.” Luke 21:20, emphasis added. Those disciples did “see” those very events. Christ’s very last words to the Pharisees from inside the second temple were, “Behold, (Your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:38. Thus Daniel’s prophecy about Jerusalem becoming “desolate” was exactly fulfilled in A.D. 70! Jesus understood this perfectly. 10. Gabriel said that the 70'week prophecy specifically applied to the Jewish people (see Daniel 9:24). During the period of Christ’s public ministry of 3 1/2 years, the Master’s focus was largely upon “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:6). After His resurrection and then for another 3 1/2 years, His disciples preached mostly to Jews (see Acts 1-6). After that second 3 1/2-year period, in 34 A.D., the bold Stephen was stoned by the Jewish Sanhedrin (see Acts 7). This infamous deed marked the then-ruling Jewish leaders’ final, official rejection of the gospel of our Savior. Then the gospel went to the Gentiles. In Acts 9, Saul became Paul, the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11:13). In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision revealing it was now time to preach to the Gentiles(see Acts l0:1-28). Read also Acts (l3:46) Thus approximately 3 1/2 years after the crucifixion-and at the end of the 70-week prophecy given for the Jewish people-the gospel shifted to the Gentiles exactly as predicted in Bible prophecy.
Multiple problems with your interpretation here my friend, Ezra's pronouncement was only to rebuild the temple, but Daniel 9 says: "So you are to know and understand that from the issuing of a [y]decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, until [z]Messiah the Prince, there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with [aa]streets and moat, even in times of distress." NASB There are three potential decree's we could choose from. The first is from Cyrus does decree to rebuild the temple; however if you look at the details you find the following. Cyrus's decree was only to rebuild the Temple, not all of Jerusalem. The city was not rebuild in response to this decree. This fails on both points that would require rebuilding of the city, and a decree to do so. The next decree is mentioned by Artaxerxes in 457BC that said to rebuild the temple too. Some work was completed on the temple and the city was partially rebuilt about 60 years later. This decree fails to meet the requirement to restore all of Jerusalem, just the temple. (Even with the calculations off this decree, it points to Jesus as Messiah) The last decree that it could be is found in Nehemiah 2 (Artaxerxes Longimanus in 444BC) which specifically mentions Jerusalem is still in ruins. Nehemiah writes this in Chapter 2: "7 And I said to the king, “If it pleases the king, let letters be given me for the governors of the provinces beyond the River, so that they will allow me to pass through until I come to Judah, 8 and a letter to Asaph the keeper of the king’s forest, so that he will give me timber to make beams for the gates of the citadel which is by the [c]temple, for the wall of the city, and for the house to which I will go.” And the king granted them to me because the good hand of my God was on me." The next verses details the decrees and letters that were specifically mentioned in Daniel 9. Nehemiah continues to describing the full restoration of Jerusalem. This can also be verified by Josephus who tells us that it was a 49 year period to restore and rebuild Jerusalem which fits the verse perfectly. The details are very specific in Daniel and Nehemiah, the other decrees fail to support this prophecy.
the christian paradigm is invincible. It doesn't matter how the truth of the Torah is presented to them, christians will filter it and shape it, and come back to their already made conclusions. תורת אמת.
wake up Christians, if you have accepted the G-d Abraham and Issac and Jacob, and believe in the Hebrew bible you have covenanted with G-d, now your are responsible to Him to keep His Torah no matter what someone else said. Welcome, now learn what the Torah says, serve G-d with joyfulness and gladness in your heart. As Tovia said vary compassionately, your eternal destination counts on what you believe.
That's why we write God with a large G and not with a small g, god with a small g means any god, even Satan is god of this world, that's what the Bible said.
I disagree, FIRST you must repent and believe on the Lord Jesus, if you do that with all your heart, then you are born again and can call yourself a child of Almighty God.
My mother is Jewish and we are both Christians now. And btw, you scythe j is not in the Hebrew alphabet, JESUS is the english translation for YESHUA, the Name ABOVE AAAAAAAALL names. You deny the true Messiah because you are still in blindness. Repent and believe on the Lord your God, JAHWEH IS JESUS, they are ONE. Believe it or not.
@@juliocastellanos4634 this also is false fabrication the bereshit does not appear to jc évent the original expression of sin not accept in judaïsme and neither into brotherhood cousin bloodline arabe but into the other nation and the totally of New testament is complet out of sence and out of holiness wisdom the nicea constantilop totally impurity of transcription and Vatican still now and mosthly this corrupt apostolique 12 and spécial Paul
@@juliocastellanos4634 yeshua was a false prophet that deserved death and Tabbi Singer was studying bereishit when he was a little kid and in Hebrew too. That is what we Jews do we live the Torah. That stuff about Jesus is what the Torah says. If we look at Jesus of the Nt straight out false prophet.
I'm confused. Was the First Temple destroyed in 586 BCE or in 423 BCE? Why is there a discrepancy of 163 between the accepted secular date for the destruction of the First Temple and the date given by the Jewish Sages in Seder Olam? I've tried to read Rabbi Alexander Hool's book, "The Challenge of Jewish History: The Bible, The Greeks & The Missing 168 Years," and I simply cannot wrap my mind around his presentation. Could somebody dumb it down for mass consumption? I've heard (from Rabbi Berel Wein) that Rabbi Shimon Schwab suggests that the 168 years were consciously removed from the Jewish calendar in order to obscure the date for the coming of Mashiach. Any thoughts on that?
there is much confusion here - the Christian view is correct - I suppose it is like Isaiah 53 - the Jews want to confuse the facts here also-- bible tells Messiah would come and die in isaiah, and daniel
Hi tovia and all, when did the 70 yr prophecy in chapter 25 begin? If it began in ch25:1 and babylon fell in 540/539bc, then wouldnt that be 65 yrs? In trying to figure this out; somewhere i landed on 605bc for when the prophecy in chapter 25 began; but i wasn’t sure if there was an earlier date that would lineup this prophecy to fit the 70 yrs. 8:49
Now explain me if the end of seventy weeks is the devastation of Israel, how is the righteousness has been brought to them and how the Holy of Holies has been anointed after that seventy weeks according to Daniel 9:24.
Now let me understand this correctly: "From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens." Confirmation: If the Anointed ruler was Cyrus, did the word got out from Hashem to rebuild Jerusalem 49 years before Cyrus' commandment? But how many years into his reign did Cyrus command Jerusalem to be rebuilt? After which Jerusalem will be built up during 434 years even during times of trouble. Commandment of Cyrus was in 536 bce according to my knowledge. In which case: 536 bce and 434 years will be in 102 bce when an Anointed one will be put to death. But this Anointed one was the High Priest who was forced from his office and executed?? in year 66 NOT in 102 bc. And year 66 was halfway into the last 70th week. So 70th week would then begin year 70 minus 7 that is 63 current era. Counting 62 weeks (434 years) backwards from year 63: 63 minus 434 years was year 401 bce. And if you count the 69 weeks before year 63 ce, this will be the result: 63 minus 490 == year 427 bce. Have I missed something? Further: what was the convenant that the prince of Rome?? set up with "the many" for a "seven" that is the 70th week, was there any convenant with the Romans beginning in 63 current era? And did the Romans stop the sacrifices half way into the 70th week, when the Hight Prest was destroyed? Was the abomination put up in the temple a statue of Titus or Vespasianus?
K. Day Cyrus, a mashiach of God, initiated the construction of the House of Hashem and the anointed (the Kohen Gadol) would vanish. The prince (as he said "Rome") would stop the gifts from being given.
Greek philosopher Aristotle writes in the 4th century B.C. that the Egyptians and the Ethiopians were very black and there hair was woolly. There were nearly a dozen other Greek writers of that time period who wrote that the Egyptians were black-skinned or burnt skinned and woolly haired. Greek writer Herodotus said the same thing.
Luke 18:31 KJV … Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and *_all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished._* Luke 24:44 KJV And he said unto them, …. *_all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me._* Dan 9:27 KJV And *he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:* Mark 14:24 And he said unto them, *_This is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many._* Romans 15:8 KJV …. *_Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision_* for the truth of God, *_to confirm the promises_* made unto the fathers: Dan 9:27 (continued) and in the midst of the week *he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,* Hebrews 10:12 KJV … *_he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever,_* … Hebrews 10:10 KJV … we are sanctified through *_the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all._* Dan 9:27 (continued) and for the… overspreading of abominations *he shall make it desolate,* even until the consummation, and *that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.* Matthew 23:37-38 KJV *O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,* _thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee_ ... [38] *_Behold, your house is left unto you desolate._*
Dont have to make big of a deal about the King Cyrus being called the anointed one. Chistians know it but not bother to say much about it because it is insignificant. Messiah, the root of Jessie is not known by the title but the description of that figure. It is really not the suprise. On top of that, at the completion of seventy weeks the righteousness will be brought and anoint the Holy of Holies. In fact with all the temple and city devastated for 2000 years onwards which Jews must have commited so great of a sin since Hashem promised that He would wipe them away when they turn back from Him, the righteousness have not been brought to them and the Holy of Holies have not been anointed after those seventy weeks which is the whole point about it.
Tovia, to think that Daniel 9:26, the anointed one cutoff is talking about and leading up to some totally insignificant priest that no-one, except countermissionaries grasping at straws, knows his name is in a word - ridiculous. Also the person is cutoff but not for himself. It is Jesus, the most well known Jew ever.
The letter of the law killeth the Spirit gives Life no more is the law written in stone but they are writ upon the heart. Romans 10 Tovia is in danger zone ruled by a religous spirit.
Interesting thing about Daniel 9:26 and its interpretation...early Christians considered it to refer to Herod Agrippa (II)...which makes for better internal logic, as he was a prime candidate for being a "messiah nagid who was to be cut off. Why? After the destruction of the temple, he went full-on "Two Powers in Heaven" and started considering the God of the Jews as jealous of a higher "Good God"...as in Plato's ideas. The Good is "Chrest." As in Chrestian, The Jossipon has an intersesting speech by Herod Agrippa (II) pretty much demonstrating he saw himself as the fulfilment of Dan 9:26...among other 'fulfilments.' Origen is among those who connected Daniel 9:26 and Herod Agrippa (II)
The reason why some Jews do not believe the second Messiah is Agrippa is from the text. The first Messiah is called Mashiach Nagid or Anointed ruler. The second one, who was cut off, is not mentioned as being Mashiach Nagid, therefore it was a non-ruler messiah. Agrippa was the king and therefore a ruler. The high priests were not considered rulers in the manner of Kings and Princes. Just figured I would mention this, do not mean any disrespect.
None taken...but as an origin point for any first version of Christianity...an initial grouping of variants WANTING Herod Agrippa II to be the messiah is a possibility.
So christians interpret the 70 weeks in Daniel the same as the Rabbi, 1 week is equivalent to 7 years, 70 weeks is the same as 490 years. How did the christian scholars and Tovia reach the same conclusion, when the book of Daniel doesn't show the formula to that conclusion?
Rabbi Singer did not reach the conclusion. He is showing you what we have known since before there was Christianity. Is just Christianity as usual raping our tanach for their own evil purposes
This explanation poses enormous chronological problems. If the second temple stood for 420 years, as claimed here, it would have to have been completed in about 350BC. This was, according to Ezra 6/7, in the sixth year of King Darius (the Great). However, Alexander the Great conquered Jerusalem, and the Persian Empire, in 333BC. How can all the Persian rulers that succeeded Darius the Great fit in the small sliver of time allotted? Jewish chronology only allows about 55 years for the Persian Empire, when conventional chronology counts about 200 years. The proposed explanation of Dan 9:24-27 in this video gives no explanation of God's wrath so as to totally destroy Jerusalem, the Temple, and so many of the Jews in AD67-70. This calamity happened for a reason, but no reason is offered here. Why was God so angry with the Jews? Daniel, who was given the prophecy, understood why the Jews incurred God's wrath. That's what his prayer in chapter 9 in all about. Also, the 40 years between 30AD and 70AD are well explained by the 40 days (picturing years) that Ezekiel lies on one side for the sins of the House of Judah in Eze 4.
So I'm 2 minutes in and my Bible must read differently because Daniel 9 says Daniel UNDERSTOOD Jeremiah's writing. -- in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the LORD given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. I just don't understand how this can be taken out of context. Are we listening to someone that is adding to what the Scriptures say? I think we may.
@@whiteswordwarrior9995 In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. Is that better? Still same thing, This is 3 years old but I think the man said that Daniel didn't understand Jeremiah's prophecy or something to that effect. You're right though, that was NIV I quoted which I rarely do. I call that one the New Jesuit Bible.. but anyway, this Scripture is plain that Daniel DID understand.
When are we going to cease using Babylonian names for the months instead of first month second month as kakatuv in Torah ? Especially the one T.....z !!! names of other gods Ye shall not mention ! Mashiach will clear this up no doubt 🌾
what should i suppose to do then? now, i'm not a Trinitarian, not a Muslim and cannot be a Jew, to what group should i have a fellowship and worship with?
I find n see the yeshua worked miracles n I believe in yeshua there are some corrupt people instead of removing cult his religions has habit of scratching others back instead 😊
Am not any good at remembering which verses say what. But I always read the whole chapters to know the whole contexture. Well I knew all this already -- except for the cross reference in Leviticus. And of course, Cyrus, as benevolent to the Jews can be called a Messiah. As all annointed kings and priests of Israel could be called messiahses. But I don't suppose that the persian king Cyrus is the one that as The Messiah will lead the eternal messianic empire, the 5th empire, after Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome-Edom....
Ezekiel 20: 34-38 Yah will gather us up all at once and we will speak to him face to face and Yah will get rid of all the trouble makers then take us into Israel. Yah doesn't need the U.N. ,England or the United States help to get us to Israel
Romans 11 (KJV) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ⁷ What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded ⁸ (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day. Rabbi, you better believe in Jesus the Christ, messiah of God Almighty in order you might be saved!!! May the Lord enlighten your eyes!!!
You say 490 years is between destruction of the first and second Temples. 586 BC to 70 AD is around 655 years. Am I understanding wrong? In the English translations, there is no mention of the Temple, only Jerusalem. Are the translations accurate? Thank you.
This guy in illiterate lol he’s says that the end of the prophecy, uh no it’s not. So Cyrus made an end of sins? Cyrus brought everlasting righteousness? Cyrus made reconciliation? How convenient this guy left all that out...
There are 2 problems I saw on this: 1) How can it be that it was Cyrus who is messiah of Daniel 9 prophecy when it says that from the going forth of the commandment to the messiah is 49 years. So, from Cyrus decree to his coming, when he already existed and came, would be 49 years? 2) 436BC - 490 = 54AD. The 70 weeks of years will therefore not end in 70AD.
@@goldengun9970 He said that Cyrus is one of the messiah of Daniel 9:24:27. How can this prophecy be fulfilled if the starting point of the prophecy is in 536BC. 536 - 490 will be 46 BCE not 70AD
What to watch for - forthcoming Judaism's "real" messiah age. In Zechariah 14, before there is universal worldwide knowledge of the One True God - a feature of the true messiah age, the Mount of Olives will have been split in half. Half to the north, half to the south. Can't miss it. If the messiah age begins before then - that is, if the Mount of Olives has not been split - the messiah person is not the real messiah, but the Antichrist, beginning a false messiah age.
Okay. I cannot help it. I will correct him. King Cyrus ended the dispora, but he was the anointed one that was being talked about in Daniel 9. By logic in the word of God itself completely destroys this. Even exposes that Jews of today aren’t from the actual bloodline. They are from a heritage of converts. Everyone has a bit of Shem blood in them, even this guy. But he’s converted to a religion. And the Jews that were in captivity were there acting as if they were doing everything God told them to do. They weren’t. Isaiah 1 clearly states that they were backslidden. He stated that if they would return he would forgive them of their sins and make them white as snow. But again, they were doing the sacrifices and feasts, but they wanted the glory for themselves. Pride in ones heritage over another. Not giving thanks to God but rather thanks to themselves. Hence Gods wrath Do God sent Jesus Christ to them. At that time they were making converts in these backslidden Jews. So the bloodline around the time of Jesus Christ was already almost out. They were living under Roman rule. So Cyrus wasn’t the messiah the Moshiach as they say in Daniel 9. Cyrus was anointed to rebuild the temple and Israel. UNTO the anointed that would come and fulfill the prophecy starting in Daniel 9:24-27. Logically it had to be. 490 years puts it dead on the money with the timing of the cross . Going on from there, the backslidden Jews had the Romans crucify Jesus Christ and then they went right back and started sacrificing after God sent his anointed Jesus Christ to the be the final sacrifice once and for all. The Jews knew the law, they knew they couldn’t do it. But they made up all kinds of loopholes to get around even the 10 commandments that they adhered to. This was the oral law that Jesus spoke against. If you believe you are deity, you can make up whatever you want and call it divine revelation and because you think you’re thoughts are that of Gods then it’s difficult to get around that in a conversation. However, a rational person can read the Bible and count. Logic dictates that no one could ever do the law right. Of course our flesh wants loopholes to law, but we still cannot do it. So a savior needed to be sent to save all of mankind. Every single one of us . So when they didn’t stop sacrificing God kicked them out in 70AD. For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate. What desolate? Jerusalem!! Why did he make it desolate? Because their sacrifices were an abomination. Why? Because they rejected Christ. And then it goes on to say until the consummation. The consummation is the end. That’s the end of this earth. The only way someone can interpret it would be to the end when the saints are gathered with whomever this messiah was in Daniel 9:27 was. Whom is proven is Christ Jesus. So the end would be that. But to a rabbi, he would spin that to mean them and going back to Israel as a possible scenario. But again, logically that cannot be. We only have the word of God. But again, if someone thinks they are deity, no matter what the word of God says, they can spin it however they want and call it divine revelation. They have that power and if we aren’t them, we don’t. Okay, but someone who studies the Bible and believes what’s in it will come to a complete different conclusion than that.
Deuteronomy 28: 15-68, Revelation 2: 9 and 3: 9, Psalm 105: 23. How does Deuteronomy 28: 15-68 pertain to the Jews that are in Israel now, Revelation 2: 9 says a lot. Look up their flag's pentagram history, a pentagram is used to control demons, to make them do your bidding. A pentagram or Star of David is not use by David, Everybody agrees that Ham is black. Egypt is the land of Ham. Yeshua (Jesus), Moses, Joseph, and Paul went into Egypt and blended in,. And for good measure When Moses' arm turned white, what was the big deal if he already was white. They didn't put that in the movie because it would not have made sense. There is never a mention of silk hair on any of the Hebrews in the Torah or the Bible, only hair like wool.
Israel's flag has no pentagram: 5 starcorners. The Jewish star of David is a hexagram, 6 starcorners. And where did you get the idea of Ham being black?? Southern hamites may have been black, but the African black peoples not counted in Genesis 10, only the people of Kush and the Nubians. Those hamites living nearest to land of Kanaan was not black, but same colorings as the Semites. Like the canaanites and the phoenicians. Their skin was not white as the northern Europeans but rather a light brown or like the skin color of people of the Middle East now.
Ahhhhh, so are saying there was a break in between the 434 years to 70 ad? Where is that in prophecy. You aren’t clear in this AT ALL. Give the years you are referring so there’s no confusion. What year are you using that Cyrus gave the command?
Ehm you do realize the temple was destroyed twice? The rabbi is referring to the first destruction by Nebuchadnezzar II, not the second destruction by the Romans.
Are you sure the war with Rome started in the year 66? Because according to what I counted the temple was destroyed at the end of the war in the year 68, and the war was 7 years long, so the war should have started in the year 61.
Here is some reasoning about when the second temple was destroyed. Historical sources say 70 current era. A Jewish site, the Chabad.com has this to say: www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2641925/jewish/Which-Year-Was-the-Second-Temple-Destroyed-69-CE-or-70-CE.htm
Furthermore, when Judaism's "real" messiah shows up and the messianic age begins, he is supposed to build the temple or oversee it be built. And the universal knowledge of the one True God will be throughout the world - no false religions, idols, etc. So the temple gets rebuilt in the messianic age by the messiah. How then is it, that in Daniel 12, there will be the abomination of desolation setup in said temple for 1290 days and blessed are those who wait to the 1335th day (the day that Jesus Returns) if it is the true messiah age ? No, it will be a false messiah age, because Judaism forthcoming "real" messiah as Judaism calls him - will turn out to be the Antichrist.
Exactly. They missed Him then and still do. It's incredible just how accurate the antichrist prophesies are and how some of us can see it coming, while others refuse to see
+Brian Gray, the Moshiach of the Bible is nothing like the Pagan christ of Christianity, your Jesus is but false messiah who Pagans turned into an idol.
Paula Eilene Wallace We see how Jesus fulfilled the Bible's prophesies pertaining to the Savior. Then we look at what the Moshiach, that the Jewish faith is waiting for, we see the antichrist agenda doing the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I would hope no one falls for this deception, but according to our new covenant prophesies many will. The antichrist will come like a good shepherd ushering in peace. Sound familiar? May God have mercy! We all want to do right by God is why we study and pray, at least find out what the mark of the beast is in Christianity.
This rabbi live alone no jewish group in israel are willing to accept him so he invent new religion to earn money and on sunday he go to church like the rest of us and when explain something he uses the christian calendar like the rest of us. I wish he will start stuttering and he will appreciate the ability to speak.
If Tovias simply stuck to Daniel 9, the angel explains it himself without needing to elaborate and jump all over into other writings. That's really being deceptive and longwinded
How The church? "Which church? There are 30000 different denominations.... each with their own peculiar theology and different Jesus Christ. None of the 30000 agree with each other, and each claim they are being led by the holy spirit. There are no less than 30000 different Christian interpretations of the tenach.
Jeffrey Stern, he's using "church" as another word for Christianity. Churches refute Judaism as does Christianity so it really doesn't matter *which* church denomination Rabbi Singer is talking about. It would be like saying "United States" and then asking which state are you referring to? There are 50 states? Yes, but they all are part of a country called the United States. Same with "church." I really don't see why this is a problem.
@@TheCytocop So you see The Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses as part of "the church"?.... interesting... since most Christians don't believe that they are. But... using your united states analogy.... I guess they are. Same with Christian Scientists and Pentacostals, where they fall over backwards. Let's not forget the nice snake handlers in the southern denominations. All are part of the "united states"of Churches. Almost forgot about the nice folks in the Philippines who nail themselves to crosses... don't want to exclude them from the body of believers. And.... everyone listed above says they are led by the holy spirit. What a nice inclusive club this spirit has going.
@@samworthy1257 ..............the church did not twist Daniel 9....though many churches are confused as to the proper interpretation....but I am not confused neither is my church - but the Jews twist it and Isaiah 53
@@DavidKing-qd3sp no. Our interpretation of Daniel actually works unlike yours Same as isaiah 53. We always read all of Isaiah. Never any reason to hide it. Then we see all this nonsense and mistranslation from you. One literally has to take it out of context and use your unbelievable mistranslation to try see jes7s in there. You can't fool us like that. We are not stupid. Repeating your nonsense won't change anything either. Isaiah 53 is one of the weakest of your so called proof texts that you have
The timing of Jesus does work Tovia. He's baptised by John at the beginning of the seventieth week. He's now "anointed". His ministry is exactly 3 1/2 years long. He's crucified in the midst of the week on the passover. He rises three days and three nights later. (hard feet for a false messiah). Then a 40 year period occurs for Israel to repent of what was prophesied to take place to begin with. The roman siege resumes the last shabua and lasts exactly 3 1/2 years according to Josephus ending in 70 a.d. and completing the prophecy. Israel is done away with the temple and the law and all that's left is the new covenant established by the blood of the Messiah, Jesus. Not one stone left upon another exactly as He told them. The new Jewish Christians fled the city as Jesus had warned them to do and many of the Jews perished in judgment while many were scattered as the prophets foretold.
contemplate His ministry was believed before Eusebius to have been about one year. It wasn’t until Eusebius where he believed his ministry was three and a half because of the seventy weeks. His interpretation was completely allegorical
I'm curious what you think about eschatology. Does that place us into the tribulation and the trampling of the saints being basically the millenia? what do you think of the general view of that last times timeline?
Tovia, if you understood Daniel 9, you would know that the messiah cutoff is Jesus, and the prince who shall come is the future Judaism's messiah, who is the Antichrist, who will betray the Mt. Sinai Covenant and the Jews.At which time, Tovia, you and all Israel will embrace Jesus as the messiah, because for one thing you are going to see that you are wrong about Daniel 9:26-27. Judaism teaches that the new covenant in Jeremiah 31 is a "renewal" of the Mt. Sinai covenant. In Daniel 9:26 the prince who shall come confirms the (Mt Sinai) for 7 years.Which following Gog/Magog is going to seem to fulfill Judaism's expectations. And the confirmation of the Mt. Sinai covenant will be that "renewal" (which it is irrational that the Mt. Sinai covenant needs renewing - because when did it "expire" - really Tovia? )Which that confirmation for 7 years is right in you bible as a requirement that Moses made in Deuteronomy 31:9-13, that the law be read to the gathering of Israel to all future generations on a 7 year cycle - which would be the "for 7 years" in Daniel 9:26.That's what the Antichrist will oversee, from the temple mount, which will begin the 7 years.
Philip, the Antichrist will oversee the building of the temple. It will not be the messianic age temple in Ezekiel, but because of the compressed time of the prophecies, the temple he will desecrate will be an interim temple of minimum size - to expedite the reinstatement of making the daily sacrifice and the holy days observances such as Yom Kippur. The tent tabernacle in the wilderness was only the size of two large bedrooms. So about 15 ft x 32 ft. Which would not take time to construct as an interim. There would also have to be built an altar outside, to burn the sacrificed animals. The time factor involved is that the person becomes the Antichrist following immediately after Gog/Magog, in a wave of messiah euphoria following that event. In Daniel 8, the person who becomes the Antichrist, the little horn, from when the sacrifices are started again, to his stopping them, to the transgression of desolation (him going into the temple sitting claiming to have achieved God-hood) , to the abomination of desolation (an image made of him, an idol) placed in the temple, to all of that being purged of the temple, cleansing of the temple when Jesus returns - is 2300 days. So if we take the 2300 days from the 2520th day that Jesus will return on (the last day of the 70th week of Daniel) - we get 220. Which means that on day 220 from when the Antichrist confirms the Mt. Sinai covenant in his charade as the Jewish messiah, the 7year cycle law that Moses made in Deuteronomy 31:9-13, 220 days into that 70th week - the temple will be built and animal sacrifices begun again. The Antichrist will not destroy said temple. It will be standing when Jesus returns. It will not be the real messianic age temple. But it will be a temple dedicated to the worship and praise of the God of Israel - which we can't fault Jews (Judaism) for that intention in wanting the temple built. That temple, small in size, will probably be destroyed by Jesus at his return, and not be a part of the messianic age temple. Here is why I say that.... The Abomination of Desolation, the image, placed in the temple, will be animated, appearing to come alive, in Revelation 13. The Abomination of Desolation is also in Daniel 12. What makes that image, a statue in the likeness of the Antichrist appear to take on life, is that it will be incarnated by Satan. In Ezekiel 28:16-19, the second half of that Chapter, there are some verses about God casting Satan down to earth, and causing a fire to come up in his midst leaving nothing but ashes - which the kings of the earth will actually see Satan in the flesh so to speak. Which if that statue is in the temple, the temple would have to be crumbled so that the image be exposed which the facade of the image will be melted away and there will be Satan standing exposed on the temple mount. Before the lone angel descends (Revelation 20) to bind him in chains to take him to the bottomless pit.
***** Philip, the no-one made a peace agreement "for 7 years" with anyone, including Titus . It does not even make sense to make a peace agreement stipulated to last for 7 years. The Romans did not fulfill Daniel 9:27 because there was no for 7 years peace agreement to start out with - to be broken in the miiddle. The Romans did fulfill 9:26 in that they destroyed the temple and city - making them the people of the prince who shall come. The entire idea that the confirms the covenant for 7 years is a peace treaty of some sorts is not on the right track anyway. Jews believe that the new covenant in Jeremiahs 31 actually means a renewal of the mt. Sinai covenant. So following Gog/Magog the confirming of the Mt. Sinai covenant for the 7 year term will be that renewal they are looking for (in their eyes). Unfortunately for them it will be by the Antichrist.
***** I am going to agree with you that God made an eternal covenant with the children of Israel that he would be their God and they His people. However, that covenant was never a covenant for eternal life. The big mistake that Judaism makes is that everyone has eternal life by default - except the very wicked. Apart from Jesus's death on the cross to remove a person's sins as though they never happened - rejecting him, dying that way, a person dies in their sins, and will not inherit eternal life. There is salvation been made available for mankind because Satan has been judged and will be destroyed - which in justice God will destroy all persons likewise for their sins as well. Don't go down to destruction with Satan. Which the new covenant in Jeremiah 31 is the one for eternal life.
sorry rabbi Tovia now I under stand why our lord was so angry when He was here. you are a rabbi ,none. of your class accepted him and He was not altogether interested in your class
I was a Christian and a Filipino, now I study Judaism. Judaism, the original faith of monotheism must be the true religion. Therefore I said to myself, to know more of Hashem is by meditating Judaism's teachings. I don't read the new testaments anymore it is quite inconsistent from what the prophets prophecy about the messiah.
Study Islam because it's keeps the laws of the moses and the Tanak and believes in the messiah who will descend to earth 40 years before the day of judgement.
armando how,
Study Islam from authentic Islamic sources and of course, ask God Almighty for guidance.
marife salih Judaism as I said is the true religion. Their God is the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus is not the messiah. The messiah is yet to come and when he comes it will be the last judgment. I respect Islam though for they believe only in one God. The new testament attached with the old is full of idolatrous teachings. It comes from the Romans and it is evil.
+armando how
According to this law, do you have comprehensive penal laws, ceremonial laws, dietary laws (details how to conduct prayers in a house of worship, wedding, funerals, etc.), in other words, a complete guidance? Or is it you take something here, something there? (this is a sincere question) You see, the Christians of today, the only prayer that I know of that Christians do that can be traced to Jesus is the Lord's Prayer. Go to any church today, every one is different, some singing, some dancing, jumping up and down, with piano, electric guitars and drums. All these cannot be traced to Jesus. For Muslims, the Qur'an is the general instructions and the Hadith, the details. As an example, the Qur'an instructs as to do prayers in general terms only. The hadith give the details of how to do it (what to say, postures, times of prayers, etc). And the Prophet also warned us against doing innovations in the matters of religion. So, we cannot invent modes of prayers.
+armando how
So, you take something here, you take something there?
I love you forever❤, Rabbi Singer. You just opened my eyes today.
SO SHARP, and spot ON!! God bless you!
Daniel 6 started to open my eyes to the one true God. Give thanks Rabbi
May His Name always be praised! Blessings to you Rabbi Tovia Singer
Amazing. The answers are there! How can people claim to believe when they have no knowledge of these scriptures? Haha. Thanks rabbi for helping me understand. From Scotland here 🏴 cheers
Awesome teaching Rabbi Baruch HaShem
In addition to being very smart, he is so sweet. A true gentleman.
The Islamic version of Jesus fears God and will be on the earth 40 years before the day of judgement.
How are these videos not bringing in over 1,000,000 views. Oh I know the yezer hara is keeping truth at bay.
because what he said have nothing to do with anything
OTO TAKE so let’s do our part and spread it. Be a light to the nations!
@@serniebanders2858 and ISAIA53 is not about Yeshuah it is about someone else ofcourse lol🤧 but they are brainwashed by a ritualistic cult most of it added by various men barmitsvah,tallit,holidays not recorded in the Torah but they pay more attention to those books added- Babylon talmud ,kabbalah ,zohra. They even revered a complete charlatan as messiah in1666 called sabatai tsevi who denounced his own Judaism throwing his hat on the floor and stamping on it!"Ye shall know them by their fruits."Matt7:15 anyone but Yeshuah why? because He was the only begotten Son of God sent to die for our inherent sins in this wicked world to redeem us from our self righteousness,racial superiority, greed,immorality,lies,hatred,serving self over others for the flesh is weak and cannot be reconciled back to God without atonement through Yeshuah the passover lamb Amen🙏checkout- 'streetministries seven' on youtube Baruch Haba Hashem Adonai👑🕯🕊🙌🔥🦁🙏
Because if anyone has scales on their eyes , it is the christians. I see quite well thank you.
Great!! Thank you dear rabbi!!
Tovia Singer, I have some questions regarding the dates you are getting on your prophecy timeline that you are showing at 11:31 in the video. Assuming that creation started at 3761 BC, you have dated the destruction of the first temple to 423 BC (3338). You have also dated the decree that Cyrus gave to the Israelites to 370 BC (3391). If I add 490 years to the get the date of the destruction of the second temple, I get about 66 to 67 AD (3828/9).
If I am interpreting this diagram right, there are some chronological issues that come up. For instance, every Ancient Near East (ANE) scholar I know will date the destruction of the first temple to 586 BC (3175/3176) and the potential decree of Cyrus to around 535 to 539 BC (3222 to 3226). How does about 160 years of history just disappear like that? What sources have you used to come to that conclusion? I know you do not like the greek historians that much (Herodotus, Xenophon, Ctesias).
Are you merely getting the dates of the fall of Babylon just from subtracting 490 years from the fall of the second temple? If that is the case, then there are serious methodological problems in your chronological reconstruction.
Bensperry, Tovia use rabbinic chronology named "Seder Olam" from II century CE, wrong chronology which is created in order to support rabinical anti-christian interpretation of prophecies. You are right about Your observation about wrong chronology.
I wondered about this prophecy and it fit tied more into the destruction of the temple and not Jesus so thank you for showing me this. I don’t think it messes with Christianity at all but it definitely shows how the old covenant ended in AD70 which actually ties into something I’ve already believed, but this helps me put that together a lot better.
✝️ JESUS IS THE MESSIAH THAT DANIEL PROPHESIED ✝️
The Messiah had to have come in Daniel Week 69, that was in the days of Rome, for the Prince Messiah of Week 69 is also the Prince of the Covenant (who brought the New Covenant) of Daniel 11:22 and is the same Prince of Princes (the Son of Man of Daniel 7, who will reign over the kingdoms of the World) of Daniel 8, and the one against him is Rome, the same one described in Week 69 that would bring down the City and the Temple (70 A.D).
Some want to say that these events did not occur at the time of Rome, and that he is talking about some Seleucid King, but Daniel 8:23 clearly explains that this character arises after the fall of the 4 Kingdoms of Greece (that is, he arises after the fall of the Seleucids, so he cannot be Antiochus)...this is Rome, who became an empire (27 BC) when the last Kingdom, the Ptolemies, was conquered by Rome.
What does all this mean then?...that Jesus was the wounded Messiah prophesied by Daniel, and that anyone claiming to be the Messiah after that date can no longer be considered Messiah, for the prophetic time has already passed, it would be too late...only Jesus fulfilled that prophecy at the exact time, and then the City and the Temple fell as Daniel said
Daniel's prophecy stopped when the City and Temple fell, this is because the prophecy of the 70 Weeks is for the People of Israel and the Holy City (Daniel 9:24), and at present Jerusalem is not fully theirs....
When the City is theirs, and the False Messiah appears, the revival of Rome with a New Herod posing as King of the Jews, making covenant with many, then the 70th Week will begin (the beginning of the events described in Daniel 11:23).... he in the middle of the Week will Reign for 3 and a half years, persecute the Understood of these prophecies, seek the removal of the New Covenant of the lamb from the hearts of those who are God's Temple, and bring Apostasy, exalting himself above all, as if he were God, thus bringing spiritual perdition, and will make alliance with 10 Kings...Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia will fall under his power...and he will return to Jerusalem with armies
This False Messiah is the Little Horn of Daniel 7 and its 10 horns, coming out of the 4th Beast/Rome, and is also the feet of Iron mixed with clay (Iron/Rome, as the Iron of the Legs, resurfaces, making alliances with the 10 toes/Kings)
But in those days of Great Tribulation will return the Nazarene, the True Messiah, from where he ascended, from the East, from the Mount of Olives, and will defeat those Kings of the False Messiah/Gog, when he is surrounding Jerusalem with his armies....for in the last days the sealed Book of Daniel will be opened, and the kingdoms of the World and Jerusalem will accept with lamentation the Pierced One and his New Covenant, because they will understand these prophecies of Daniel to be fulfilled, being cleansed, made white and Purified through the New Covenant....
Nothing you stated refutes Tovias argument. Can you show me where the New Testemant references Daniel 9 prophecy? If not then the Gospel writers could not read Hebrew or they knew it wasn't about Jesus
@@lessthansionYes, it does... besides, the Nazarene was already speaking of that prophecy, how he would be rejected and wounded, and how the temple and the city would fall, as Daniel 9 says
♦ If Cyrus is Messiah and shepherd and Jesus is not then Cyrus should be the one to come at the end of days and restore peace to the world.
That means Cyrus has a second coming ....... but wait ..... the shepherd comes from the house of David.
_[23] I will appoint over them one shepherd, My servant David, and he will feed them. He will feed them and be their shepherd. [24] I, the LORD, will be their God, and My servant David will be a prince among them. I, the LORD, have spoken._ (Ezekiel 34:23-24)
Tovia has created a problem for himself with his interpretation but if you've seen more recent vids he's lost some of that gut.
He must have had a chauffeur or his wife drove because he wouldn't get that gut behind the steering wheel.
finally a Jewish brother is helping us to let this christiens know their religion is from Paul it fake if you die believing a man is a god you going to hell.
I always wonder why people say "Judeo-chrisitan" when Jews believe in only the One true God of Abraham. While the church teaches the worship of trinity.
I think that's a little silly that just because that a just, loving god is going to send a sincere Christian to be tortured and choking and screaming in hell fire because he or she was a little misled. Where in the Torah does it teach a literal hell? I thought it was sheol or the grave and after the fall, man's curse was aging and dying and being asleep in the grave.
silly
amadou camara the unforgivable sin is not believing in the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit of course we are to love the Jews Judaism for God Yahweh gives van strong delusion
There is no such thing as hell in the Hebrew Bible. Jews in the ancient world did not believe in an immortal soul that lives on after death. If you only consider the Old Testament to be God's word then there is no basis for believing in a hell.
Thank You!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1. The entire prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 covers a period of “seventy weeks.” This period applies to one complete, sequential block of time. This prophecy would start during the Persian period and would end during the time of the Messiah.
2. Logic requires that the 70th week follow immediately after the 69th week. If it does not, then it cannot properly be called the 70th week!
3. It is illogical to insert a 2,000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. No hint of this gap is found in the prophecy itself. There is no gap between the first 7 weeks and the following 62 weeks. Why insert one between the 69th and the 70th week?
4. Daniel 9:27 says nothing about a seven-year period of tribulation, or about any Antichrist
5. The focus of this prophecy is the Messiah, not the Antichrist. Modern interpreters have applied “the people of the prince” who would come to “destroy the city and the sanctuary” (verse 26) to the Antichrist. Yet the text does not say this. In the past, that sentence has been applied to the Romans, who under Prince Titus did “destroy the city and the sanctuary” in'‘A.D. 70
6. “He shall confirm the covenant.” Jesus Christ came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.” Romans 15:8. Nowhere in the Bible is Antichrist ever said to make or confirm a covenant with anyone! The word “covenant” always applies to the Messiah, never to the Antichrist!
7. “He shall confirm the covenant with many.” Jesus said, “This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” Matthew 26:28. Jesus used the same words, because He knew that He was fulfilling Daniel 9:27!
8. “In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” The 70th week was from A.D. 27 to 34. After three and a half years of ministry, Christ died in A.D. 31, “in the midst [middle] of the week.” At the moment of His death, “the veil of the temple was rent [torn] in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matthew 27. The Great Sacrifice had been offered!
9. “For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.” Jesus plainly applied this “abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet” (Matthew 24:15) to the time when His followers were to flee from Jerusalem before the destruction of the second temple in A.D. 70. Jesus told His 12 disciples, “When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies [the Roman armies led by Prince Titus], then know that its desolation is near.” Luke 21:20, emphasis added. Those disciples did “see” those very events. Christ’s very last words to the Pharisees from inside the second temple were, “Behold, (Your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:38. Thus Daniel’s prophecy about Jerusalem becoming “desolate” was exactly fulfilled in A.D. 70! Jesus understood this perfectly.
10. Gabriel said that the 70'week prophecy specifically applied to the Jewish people (see Daniel 9:24). During the period of Christ’s public ministry of 3 1/2 years, the Master’s focus was largely upon “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:6). After His resurrection and then for another 3 1/2 years, His disciples preached mostly to Jews (see Acts 1-6). After that second 3 1/2-year period, in 34 A.D., the bold Stephen was stoned by the Jewish Sanhedrin (see Acts 7). This infamous deed marked the then-ruling Jewish leaders’ final, official rejection of the gospel of our Savior. Then the gospel went to the Gentiles. In Acts 9, Saul became Paul, the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11:13). In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision revealing it was now time to preach to the Gentiles(see Acts l0:1-28). Read also Acts (l3:46) Thus approximately 3 1/2 years after the crucifixion-and at the end of the 70-week prophecy given for the Jewish people-the gospel shifted to the Gentiles exactly as predicted in Bible prophecy.
Multiple problems with your interpretation here my friend, Ezra's pronouncement was only to rebuild the temple, but Daniel 9 says:
"So you are to know and understand that from the issuing of a [y]decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, until [z]Messiah the Prince, there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with [aa]streets and moat, even in times of distress." NASB
There are three potential decree's we could choose from. The first is from Cyrus does decree to rebuild the temple; however if you look at the details you find the following. Cyrus's decree was only to rebuild the Temple, not all of Jerusalem. The city was not rebuild in response to this decree. This fails on both points that would require rebuilding of the city, and a decree to do so.
The next decree is mentioned by Artaxerxes in 457BC that said to rebuild the temple too. Some work was completed on the temple and the city was partially rebuilt about 60 years later. This decree fails to meet the requirement to restore all of Jerusalem, just the temple. (Even with the calculations off this decree, it points to Jesus as Messiah)
The last decree that it could be is found in Nehemiah 2 (Artaxerxes Longimanus in 444BC) which specifically mentions Jerusalem is still in ruins. Nehemiah writes this in Chapter 2:
"7 And I said to the king, “If it pleases the king, let letters be given me for the governors of the provinces beyond the River, so that they will allow me to pass through until I come to Judah, 8 and a letter to Asaph the keeper of the king’s forest, so that he will give me timber to make beams for the gates of the citadel which is by the [c]temple, for the wall of the city, and for the house to which I will go.” And the king granted them to me because the good hand of my God was on me."
The next verses details the decrees and letters that were specifically mentioned in Daniel 9. Nehemiah continues to describing the full restoration of Jerusalem. This can also be verified by Josephus who tells us that it was a 49 year period to restore and rebuild Jerusalem which fits the verse perfectly. The details are very specific in Daniel and Nehemiah, the other decrees fail to support this prophecy.
the christian paradigm is invincible. It doesn't matter how the truth of the Torah is presented to them, christians will filter it and shape it, and come back to their already made conclusions. תורת אמת.
wake up Christians, if you have accepted the G-d Abraham and Issac and Jacob, and believe in the Hebrew bible you have covenanted with G-d, now your are responsible to Him to keep His Torah no matter what someone else said.
Welcome, now learn what the Torah says, serve G-d with joyfulness and gladness in your heart.
As Tovia said vary compassionately, your eternal destination counts on what you believe.
Christians are NOT UNDER the Law of Moses, the Law was given to the Jews.
Allah is not almighty God, not God the Creator.
That's why we write God with a large G and not with a small g, god with a small g means any god, even Satan is god of this world, that's what the Bible said.
I disagree, FIRST you must repent and believe on the Lord Jesus, if you do that with all your heart, then you are born again and can call yourself a child of Almighty God.
My mother is Jewish and we are both Christians now. And btw, you scythe j is not in the Hebrew alphabet, JESUS is the english translation for YESHUA, the Name ABOVE AAAAAAAALL names. You deny the true Messiah because you are still in blindness. Repent and believe on the Lord your God, JAHWEH IS JESUS, they are ONE. Believe it or not.
Wow, you killed it!
Rabbi tovia nid to go to study berechit to see the way to the cross that yeshua has to go for my and you
@@juliocastellanos4634 this also is false fabrication the bereshit does not appear to jc évent the original expression of sin not accept in judaïsme and neither into brotherhood cousin bloodline arabe but into the other nation and the totally of New testament is complet out of sence and out of holiness wisdom the nicea constantilop totally impurity of transcription and Vatican still now and mosthly this corrupt apostolique 12 and spécial Paul
Yeshua savior is the only way to ABBA KADOSH hi is thi ligth of the world
His the only one can open your eyes
@@juliocastellanos4634 yeshua was a false prophet that deserved death and Tabbi Singer was studying bereishit when he was a little kid and in Hebrew too. That is what we Jews do we live the Torah.
That stuff about Jesus is what the Torah says. If we look at Jesus of the Nt straight out false prophet.
How long did it take to build the second temple from cyrus’ announcement to build.
Rabbi tovia, you are the son of God of Abraham Isaac jacob.I with you because God of Israel is with you.thank you for come in Philippines.
I'm confused. Was the First Temple destroyed in 586 BCE or in 423 BCE? Why is there a discrepancy of 163 between the accepted secular date for the destruction of the First Temple and the date given by the Jewish Sages in Seder Olam? I've tried to read Rabbi Alexander Hool's book, "The Challenge of Jewish History: The Bible, The Greeks & The Missing 168 Years," and I simply cannot wrap my mind around his presentation. Could somebody dumb it down for mass consumption? I've heard (from Rabbi Berel Wein) that Rabbi Shimon Schwab suggests that the 168 years were consciously removed from the Jewish calendar in order to obscure the date for the coming of Mashiach. Any thoughts on that?
there is much confusion here - the Christian view is correct - I suppose it is like Isaiah 53 - the Jews want to confuse the facts here also-- bible tells Messiah would come and die in isaiah, and daniel
@@DavidKing-qd3sp the bible yes, the tanakh no.
Hi tovia and all, when did the 70 yr prophecy in chapter 25 begin? If it began in ch25:1 and babylon fell in 540/539bc, then wouldnt that be 65 yrs? In trying to figure this out; somewhere i landed on 605bc for when the prophecy in chapter 25 began; but i wasn’t sure if there was an earlier date that would lineup this prophecy to fit the 70 yrs. 8:49
Now explain me if the end of seventy weeks is the devastation of Israel, how is the righteousness has been brought to them and how the Holy of Holies has been anointed after that seventy weeks according to Daniel 9:24.
We learn this in jewish school.
Shocking as an adult to see the messed up christian commentary
Am I missing something here? Math does not make sense. 2nd temple was finished in 515 BC and destroyed in 70CE = 585 years, not 420 years.
350 BCE according to Jewish traditions.
@Abraham Mani Poor you Violating the Sabbath as you posted this on Sabbath. And worshipping Idolatry. Sad!
Thank you my Dear Friend!
May your words cause many to turn back to G-D.
I hope my countrymen will finally realize that only the Torah is Divine...
I hope my computer will finally realize that only the Torah is Divine...
God*
Now let me understand this correctly: "From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens." Confirmation: If the Anointed ruler was Cyrus, did the word got out from Hashem to rebuild Jerusalem 49 years before Cyrus' commandment? But how many years into his reign did Cyrus command Jerusalem to be rebuilt? After which Jerusalem will be built up during 434 years even during times of trouble. Commandment of Cyrus was in 536 bce according to my knowledge. In which case: 536 bce and 434 years will be in 102 bce when an Anointed one will be put to death. But this Anointed one was the High Priest who was forced from his office and executed?? in year 66 NOT in 102 bc. And year 66 was halfway into the last 70th week. So 70th week would then begin year 70 minus 7 that is 63 current era. Counting 62 weeks (434 years) backwards from year 63: 63 minus 434 years was year 401 bce. And if you count the 69 weeks before year 63 ce, this will be the result: 63 minus 490 == year 427 bce. Have I missed something? Further: what was the convenant that the prince of Rome?? set up with "the many" for a "seven" that is the 70th week, was there any convenant with the Romans beginning in 63 current era? And did the Romans stop the sacrifices half way into the 70th week, when the Hight Prest was destroyed? Was the abomination put up in the temple a statue of Titus or Vespasianus?
Chara Choppel he didn’t really explain shit just confused me more
If you want to understand Daniel 9 just ask me as I see you were here 4 years ago and may no longer be on this site
You mixed up hebrew bible and archeological knowledge , i hope things get clearer by now.
So, I'm still confused. What is the fulfillment of Daniel 9:24-27? Who do the jews think it was referring? After the 69th week?
K. Day
Cyrus, a mashiach of God, initiated the construction of the House of Hashem and the anointed (the Kohen Gadol) would vanish. The prince (as he said "Rome") would stop the gifts from being given.
@@Meshack Thank you but that doesnt really answer my question. Who was the annointed one that came after the 69 weeks?
K. Day no one truly knows study yourself
@@RoseSharon7777 he already answered, the kohen gadolor high priest...
Charmagne Rei Fajardo Thank you. Guess I misunderstood him.
Greek philosopher Aristotle writes in the 4th century B.C. that the
Egyptians and the Ethiopians were very black and there hair was woolly.
There were nearly a dozen other Greek writers of that time period who
wrote that the Egyptians were black-skinned or burnt skinned and woolly haired. Greek
writer Herodotus said the same thing.
13:47 ''If Jesus is the Messiah you have to serve him and worship him''???
Does he say that the messiah is to be worshiped?
@Raizel רייזל Thank you so much for your kindness!!! Bless you so much!!
Rabbi, could you inform me who the singer is at the end of this video and your other videos. I believe it's called , Adon Olam.
Adon Olam is the name of the song. I don't know who is singing it.
Since eternal life may depend on these verses, you should consider the other sides argument as well. John MacArthur might be the guy to go to.
Luke 18:31 KJV
… Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and *_all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished._*
Luke 24:44 KJV
And he said unto them, …. *_all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me._*
Dan 9:27 KJV
And *he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:*
Mark 14:24
And he said unto them, *_This is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many._*
Romans 15:8 KJV
…. *_Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision_* for the truth of God, *_to confirm the promises_* made unto the fathers:
Dan 9:27 (continued)
and in the midst of the week *he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,*
Hebrews 10:12 KJV
… *_he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever,_* …
Hebrews 10:10 KJV
… we are sanctified through *_the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all._*
Dan 9:27 (continued)
and for the… overspreading of abominations *he shall make it desolate,* even until the consummation, and *that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.*
Matthew 23:37-38 KJV
*O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,* _thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee_ ...
[38] *_Behold, your house is left unto you desolate._*
ye shall bare your iniquities(house of Judah) 40 years and shall know my breach of promise...
I'm pretty sure that was talking about the 40 years they were in the desert with Moses if you read it in context.
Dont have to make big of a deal about the King Cyrus being called the anointed one. Chistians know it but not bother to say much about it because it is insignificant. Messiah, the root of Jessie is not known by the title but the description of that figure. It is really not the suprise. On top of that, at the completion of seventy weeks the righteousness will be brought and anoint the Holy of Holies. In fact with all the temple and city devastated for 2000 years onwards which Jews must have commited so great of a sin since Hashem promised that He would wipe them away when they turn back from Him, the righteousness have not been brought to them and the Holy of Holies have not been anointed after those seventy weeks which is the whole point about it.
If the 70 weeks of Daniel is one long period of 490 years, how is it only 490 years from Cyrus' decree to the destruction of the second temple?
How would you explain the fact that Titus destroyed Jerusalem on the very same day ... 9 of the 5th month ?
Tovia, to think that Daniel 9:26, the anointed one cutoff is talking about and leading up to some totally insignificant priest that no-one, except countermissionaries grasping at straws, knows his name is in a word - ridiculous. Also the person is cutoff but not for himself.
It is Jesus, the most well known Jew ever.
jesus the FAILED MESSIAH...
@@joelweiner4798 Failed by rising from the dead....right
The letter of the law killeth the Spirit gives Life no more is the law written in stone but they are writ upon the heart. Romans 10 Tovia is in danger zone ruled by a religous spirit.
Interesting thing about Daniel 9:26 and its interpretation...early Christians considered it to refer to Herod Agrippa (II)...which makes for better internal logic, as he was a prime candidate for being a "messiah nagid who was to be cut off. Why? After the destruction of the temple, he went full-on "Two Powers in Heaven" and started considering the God of the Jews as jealous of a higher "Good God"...as in Plato's ideas. The Good is "Chrest." As in Chrestian, The Jossipon has an intersesting speech by Herod Agrippa (II) pretty much demonstrating he saw himself as the fulfilment of Dan 9:26...among other 'fulfilments.' Origen is among those who connected Daniel 9:26 and Herod Agrippa (II)
The reason why some Jews do not believe the second Messiah is Agrippa is from the text. The first Messiah is called Mashiach Nagid or Anointed ruler. The second one, who was cut off, is not mentioned as being Mashiach Nagid, therefore it was a non-ruler messiah. Agrippa was the king and therefore a ruler. The high priests were not considered rulers in the manner of Kings and Princes. Just figured I would mention this, do not mean any disrespect.
None taken...but as an origin point for any first version of Christianity...an initial grouping of variants WANTING Herod Agrippa II to be the messiah is a possibility.
So christians interpret the 70 weeks in Daniel the same as the Rabbi, 1 week is equivalent to 7 years, 70 weeks is the same as 490 years. How did the christian scholars and Tovia reach the same conclusion, when the book of Daniel doesn't show the formula to that conclusion?
Rabbi Singer did not reach the conclusion. He is showing you what we have known since before there was Christianity. Is just Christianity as usual raping our tanach for their own evil purposes
This explanation poses enormous chronological problems. If the second temple stood for 420 years, as claimed here, it would have to have been completed in about 350BC. This was, according to Ezra 6/7, in the sixth year of King Darius (the Great). However, Alexander the Great conquered Jerusalem, and the Persian Empire, in 333BC. How can all the Persian rulers that succeeded Darius the Great fit in the small sliver of time allotted? Jewish chronology only allows about 55 years for the Persian Empire, when conventional chronology counts about 200 years.
The proposed explanation of Dan 9:24-27 in this video gives no explanation of God's wrath so as to totally destroy Jerusalem, the Temple, and so many of the Jews in AD67-70. This calamity happened for a reason, but no reason is offered here. Why was God so angry with the Jews? Daniel, who was given the prophecy, understood why the Jews incurred God's wrath. That's what his prayer in chapter 9 in all about.
Also, the 40 years between 30AD and 70AD are well explained by the 40 days (picturing years) that Ezekiel lies on one side for the sins of the House of Judah in Eze 4.
the decree is in Ezra 7:11-26, right before your eyes in the Bible, by Artaxerxes. Jesus is Messiah!
So I'm 2 minutes in and my Bible must read differently because Daniel 9 says Daniel UNDERSTOOD Jeremiah's writing. -- in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the LORD given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. I just don't understand how this can be taken out of context. Are we listening to someone that is adding to what the Scriptures say? I think we may.
The bible youre reading is indeed someone who added to scripture.
@@whiteswordwarrior9995 In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. Is that better? Still same thing, This is 3 years old but I think the man said that Daniel didn't understand Jeremiah's prophecy or something to that effect. You're right though, that was NIV I quoted which I rarely do. I call that one the New Jesuit Bible.. but anyway, this Scripture is plain that Daniel DID understand.
@@CrossroadToCountry 70 years reign of Babylon over Israel
When are we going to cease using Babylonian names for the months instead of first month second month as kakatuv in Torah ?
Especially the one T.....z !!! names of other gods Ye shall not mention !
Mashiach will clear this up no doubt 🌾
do the gentiles need to keep the sabbath?
numbers 10:10 there is only one Torah for you Israel and for a foreigner who sojorns with you
what should i suppose to do then? now, i'm not a Trinitarian, not a Muslim and cannot be a Jew, to what group should i have a fellowship and worship with?
chaiyaphumnako bnai Noach
@@chaiyaphumnako no you dont need to keep the torah
just 7 laws of noah
@@chaiyaphumnako I'm in the same boat as you.
What about the 62 weeks? Anyone could help?
Yes. What about it?
messiach is the one who is anointed to carry out specific service for GOD
Messiah is not involved in this prophecy
I find n see the yeshua worked miracles n I believe in yeshua there are some corrupt people instead of removing cult his religions has habit of scratching others back instead 😊
Am not any good at remembering which verses say what. But I always read the whole chapters to know the whole contexture. Well I knew all this already -- except for the cross reference in Leviticus. And of course, Cyrus, as benevolent to the Jews can be called a Messiah. As all annointed kings and priests of Israel could be called messiahses. But I don't suppose that the persian king Cyrus is the one that as The Messiah will lead the eternal messianic empire, the 5th empire, after Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome-Edom....
That is not how to explain to people read vs by vs
I am afraid that you have not come anywhere close to why 490 ~
Ezekiel 20: 34-38 Yah will gather us up all at once and we will speak to him
face to face and Yah will get rid of all the trouble makers then take us
into Israel. Yah doesn't need the U.N. ,England or the United States
help to get us to Israel
Romans 11 (KJV)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
⁷ What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded
⁸ (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.
Rabbi, you better believe in Jesus the Christ, messiah of God Almighty in order you might be saved!!! May the Lord enlighten your eyes!!!
You say 490 years is between destruction of the first and second Temples. 586 BC to 70 AD is around 655 years. Am I understanding wrong?
In the English translations, there is no mention of the Temple, only Jerusalem. Are the translations accurate? Thank you.
English translation is corrupted. Thay why you need learn original Bible language to understand well your religion .
not just listening to your church
I make it 484 years.
This guy in illiterate lol he’s says that the end of the prophecy, uh no it’s not. So Cyrus made an end of sins? Cyrus brought everlasting righteousness? Cyrus made reconciliation? How convenient this guy left all that out...
Quite a straw argument you have made there
@@ZUGZUGGERING how so? Please. Elaborate.
Excellent points.
There are 2 problems I saw on this: 1) How can it be that it was Cyrus who is messiah of Daniel 9 prophecy when it says that from the going forth of the commandment to the messiah is 49 years. So, from Cyrus decree to his coming, when he already existed and came, would be 49 years? 2) 436BC - 490 = 54AD. The 70 weeks of years will therefore not end in 70AD.
You are confused. Cyrus was a messiah but shown in tanach in isaiah, not Daniel.
@@goldengun9970 He said that Cyrus is one of the messiah of Daniel 9:24:27. How can this prophecy be fulfilled if the starting point of the prophecy is in 536BC. 536 - 490 will be 46 BCE not 70AD
I was promised Philippians. Where is Philippians?
What to watch for - forthcoming Judaism's "real" messiah age.
In Zechariah 14, before there is universal worldwide knowledge of the One True God - a feature of the true messiah age, the Mount of Olives will have been split in half. Half to the north, half to the south.
Can't miss it.
If the messiah age begins before then - that is, if the Mount of Olives has not been split - the messiah person is not the real messiah, but the Antichrist, beginning a false messiah age.
Yeschua is not GOD. He is hese Son. He say it . But the church are not say the truth.
so wait you think Yeshuah was just a guy and not a heretic? you must not be jewish. I believe Jesus is the Almighty so I am assuming you are muslim
Okay. I cannot help it. I will correct him.
King Cyrus ended the dispora, but he was the anointed one that was being talked about in Daniel 9. By logic in the word of God itself completely destroys this.
Even exposes that Jews of today aren’t from the actual bloodline. They are from a heritage of converts. Everyone has a bit of Shem blood in them, even this guy. But he’s converted to a religion.
And the Jews that were in captivity were there acting as if they were doing everything God told them to do. They weren’t. Isaiah 1 clearly states that they were backslidden. He stated that if they would return he would forgive them of their sins and make them white as snow.
But again, they were doing the sacrifices and feasts, but they wanted the glory for themselves. Pride in ones heritage over another. Not giving thanks to God but rather thanks to themselves.
Hence Gods wrath
Do God sent Jesus Christ to them. At that time they were making converts in these backslidden Jews. So the bloodline around the time of Jesus Christ was already almost out. They were living under Roman rule.
So Cyrus wasn’t the messiah the Moshiach as they say in Daniel 9. Cyrus was anointed to rebuild the temple and Israel. UNTO the anointed that would come and fulfill the prophecy starting in Daniel 9:24-27.
Logically it had to be. 490 years puts it dead on the money with the timing of the cross .
Going on from there, the backslidden Jews had the Romans crucify Jesus Christ and then they went right back and started sacrificing after God sent his anointed Jesus Christ to the be the final sacrifice once and for all.
The Jews knew the law, they knew they couldn’t do it. But they made up all kinds of loopholes to get around even the 10 commandments that they adhered to. This was the oral law that Jesus spoke against.
If you believe you are deity, you can make up whatever you want and call it divine revelation and because you think you’re thoughts are that of Gods then it’s difficult to get around that in a conversation.
However, a rational person can read the Bible and count. Logic dictates that no one could ever do the law right. Of course our flesh wants loopholes to law, but we still cannot do it. So a savior needed to be sent to save all of mankind. Every single one of us .
So when they didn’t stop sacrificing God kicked them out in 70AD. For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.
What desolate? Jerusalem!! Why did he make it desolate? Because their sacrifices were an abomination.
Why? Because they rejected Christ. And then it goes on to say until the consummation.
The consummation is the end. That’s the end of this earth. The only way someone can interpret it would be to the end when the saints are gathered with whomever this messiah was in Daniel 9:27 was. Whom is proven is Christ Jesus.
So the end would be that. But to a rabbi, he would spin that to mean them and going back to Israel as a possible scenario. But again, logically that cannot be. We only have the word of God. But again, if someone thinks they are deity, no matter what the word of God says, they can spin it however they want and call it divine revelation. They have that power and if we aren’t them, we don’t.
Okay, but someone who studies the Bible and believes what’s in it will come to a complete different conclusion than that.
i'm sorry, i love Rabbi Singer. Super spot-on, insightful. BUT THE FEEDBACK ON THIS VIDEO IS TERRIBLE. lol. Great info though.
Yes. Many triggered Christians. Too bad, that is what they get for perverting our tanach
May Jesus Christ open your eyes, Rabbi
Keep the 7 Noahide commandments and leave Jews alone.
Deuteronomy 28: 15-68, Revelation 2: 9 and 3: 9, Psalm 105: 23. How
does Deuteronomy 28: 15-68 pertain to the Jews that are in Israel now,
Revelation 2: 9 says a lot. Look up their flag's pentagram history, a
pentagram is used to control demons, to make them do your bidding. A
pentagram or Star of David is not use by David, Everybody agrees that
Ham is black. Egypt is the land of Ham. Yeshua (Jesus), Moses, Joseph, and Paul
went into Egypt and blended in,. And for good measure When Moses'
arm turned white, what was the big deal if he already was white. They
didn't put that in the movie because it would not have made sense. There
is never a mention of silk hair on any of the Hebrews in the Torah or
the Bible, only hair like wool.
Israel's flag has no pentagram: 5 starcorners. The Jewish star of David is a hexagram, 6 starcorners. And where did you get the idea of Ham being black?? Southern hamites may have been black, but the African black peoples not counted in Genesis 10, only the people of Kush and the Nubians. Those hamites living nearest to land of Kanaan was not black, but same colorings as the Semites. Like the canaanites and the phoenicians. Their skin was not white as the northern Europeans but rather a light brown or like the skin color of people of the Middle East now.
So your counting 49 weeks then the 434 years? That’s 483 years. That doesn’t get you to 70 ad.
We are liveing just like the church of Laodicea Revelation3:14
Ahhhhh, so are saying there was a break in between the 434 years to 70 ad? Where is that in prophecy. You aren’t clear in this AT ALL. Give the years you are referring so there’s no confusion. What year are you using that Cyrus gave the command?
Ehm you do realize the temple was destroyed twice? The rabbi is referring to the first destruction by Nebuchadnezzar II, not the second destruction by the Romans.
Dux D yes. I understand.
Are you sure the war with Rome started in the year 66? Because according to what I counted the temple was destroyed at the end of the war in the year 68, and the war was 7 years long, so the war should have started in the year 61.
Here is some reasoning about when the second temple was destroyed. Historical sources say 70 current era. A Jewish site, the Chabad.com has this to say: www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2641925/jewish/Which-Year-Was-the-Second-Temple-Destroyed-69-CE-or-70-CE.htm
13:05
living at the end times for sure this is a time of the apostasy
It’s a shame this guy is the author of confusion like just say the answer, got everyone confused
Furthermore, when Judaism's "real" messiah shows up and the messianic age begins, he is supposed to build the temple or oversee it be built. And the universal knowledge of the one True God will be throughout the world - no false religions, idols, etc.
So the temple gets rebuilt in the messianic age by the messiah.
How then is it, that in Daniel 12, there will be the abomination of desolation setup in said temple for 1290 days and blessed are those who wait to the 1335th day (the day that Jesus Returns) if it is the true messiah age ? No, it will be a false messiah age, because Judaism forthcoming "real" messiah as Judaism calls him - will turn out to be the Antichrist.
lol
Umm, that did happen, that is abomination of desolation.
Exactly. They missed Him then and still do. It's incredible just how accurate the antichrist prophesies are and how some of us can see it coming, while others refuse to see
+Brian Gray, the Moshiach of the Bible is nothing like the Pagan christ of Christianity, your Jesus is but false messiah who Pagans turned into an idol.
Paula Eilene Wallace We see how Jesus fulfilled the Bible's prophesies pertaining to the Savior. Then we look at what the Moshiach, that the Jewish faith is waiting for, we see the antichrist agenda doing the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I would hope no one falls for this deception, but according to our new covenant prophesies many will. The antichrist will come like a good shepherd ushering in peace. Sound familiar? May God have mercy! We all want to do right by God is why we study and pray, at least find out what the mark of the beast is in Christianity.
This rabbi live alone no jewish group in israel are willing to accept him so he invent new religion to earn money and on sunday he go to church like the rest of us and when explain something he uses the christian calendar like the rest of us. I wish he will start stuttering and he will appreciate the ability to speak.
Could you please add some links to confirm "no jewish group in israel are willing to accept him so he invent new religion to earn money".
If Tovias simply stuck to Daniel 9, the angel explains it himself without needing to elaborate and jump all over into other writings. That's really being deceptive and longwinded
How The church? "Which church? There are 30000 different denominations.... each with their own peculiar theology and different Jesus Christ. None of the 30000 agree with each other, and each claim they are being led by the holy spirit. There are no less than 30000 different Christian interpretations of the tenach.
All are birthed in the Catholic Church.
Jeffrey Stern, he's using "church" as another word for Christianity. Churches refute Judaism as does Christianity so it really doesn't matter *which* church denomination Rabbi Singer is talking about. It would be like saying "United States" and then asking which state are you referring to? There are 50 states? Yes, but they all are part of a country called the United States. Same with "church." I really don't see why this is a problem.
@@TheCytocop So you see The Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses as part of "the church"?.... interesting... since most Christians don't believe that they are. But... using your united states analogy.... I guess they are. Same with Christian Scientists and Pentacostals, where they fall over backwards. Let's not forget the nice snake handlers in the southern denominations. All are part of the "united states"of Churches. Almost forgot about the nice folks in the Philippines who nail themselves to crosses... don't want to exclude them from the body of believers. And.... everyone listed above says they are led by the holy spirit. What a nice inclusive club this spirit has going.
there are much smarter,wiser and older rabbi that has prove what you just sarcastically (with a smurk in your face) tried to explain to be wrong....
JC got busted again!...
The Jews twisted the interpretation of Daniel 9 and Isaiah 53....the view presented here is wrong and only the confused will believe it
We twisted it. That isn't even funny
@@samworthy1257 ..............the church did not twist Daniel 9....though many churches are confused as to the proper interpretation....but I am not confused neither is my church - but the Jews twist it and Isaiah 53
@@DavidKing-qd3sp no. Our interpretation of Daniel actually works unlike yours
Same as isaiah 53. We always read all of Isaiah. Never any reason to hide it. Then we see all this nonsense and mistranslation from you. One literally has to take it out of context and use your unbelievable mistranslation to try see jes7s in there. You can't fool us like that. We are not stupid. Repeating your nonsense won't change anything either. Isaiah 53 is one of the weakest of your so called proof texts that you have
@@samworthy1257 ............the Jews put a curse on anyone reading daniel 9 - so are hiding things which is common among cults
Why do you reject the Lord your God.
We don't. We would never do that
The timing of Jesus does work Tovia. He's baptised by John at the beginning of the seventieth week. He's now "anointed". His ministry is exactly 3 1/2 years long. He's crucified in the midst of the week on the passover. He rises three days and three nights later. (hard feet for a false messiah). Then a 40 year period occurs for Israel to repent of what was prophesied to take place to begin with. The roman siege resumes the last shabua and lasts exactly 3 1/2 years according to Josephus ending in 70 a.d. and completing the prophecy. Israel is done away with the temple and the law and all that's left is the new covenant established by the blood of the Messiah, Jesus. Not one stone left upon another exactly as He told them. The new Jewish Christians fled the city as Jesus had warned them to do and many of the Jews perished in judgment while many were scattered as the prophets foretold.
contemplate
His ministry was believed before Eusebius to have been about one year. It wasn’t until Eusebius where he believed his ministry was three and a half because of the seventy weeks. His interpretation was completely allegorical
I'm curious what you think about eschatology. Does that place us into the tribulation and the trampling of the saints being basically the millenia? what do you think of the general view of that last times timeline?
Tovia, if you understood Daniel 9, you would know that the messiah cutoff is Jesus, and the prince who shall come is the future Judaism's messiah, who is the Antichrist, who will betray the Mt. Sinai Covenant and the Jews.At which time, Tovia, you and all Israel will embrace Jesus as the messiah, because for one thing you are going to see that you are wrong about Daniel 9:26-27. Judaism teaches that the new covenant in Jeremiah 31 is a "renewal" of the Mt. Sinai covenant. In Daniel 9:26 the prince who shall come confirms the (Mt Sinai) for 7 years.Which following Gog/Magog is going to seem to fulfill Judaism's expectations. And the confirmation of the Mt. Sinai covenant will be that "renewal" (which it is irrational that the Mt. Sinai covenant needs renewing - because when did it "expire" - really Tovia? )Which that confirmation for 7 years is right in you bible as a requirement that Moses made in Deuteronomy 31:9-13, that the law be read to the gathering of Israel to all future generations on a 7 year cycle - which would be the "for 7 years" in Daniel 9:26.That's what the Antichrist will oversee, from the temple mount, which will begin the 7 years.
Philip, the Antichrist will oversee the building of the temple. It will not be the messianic age temple in Ezekiel, but because of the compressed time of the prophecies, the temple he will desecrate will be an interim temple of minimum size - to expedite the reinstatement of making the daily sacrifice and the holy days observances such as Yom Kippur.
The tent tabernacle in the wilderness was only the size of two large bedrooms. So about 15 ft x 32 ft. Which would not take time to construct as an interim. There would also have to be built an altar outside, to burn the sacrificed animals.
The time factor involved is that the person becomes the Antichrist following immediately after Gog/Magog, in a wave of messiah euphoria following that event.
In Daniel 8, the person who becomes the Antichrist, the little horn, from when the sacrifices are started again, to his stopping them, to the transgression of desolation (him going into the temple sitting claiming to have achieved God-hood) , to the abomination of desolation (an image made of him, an idol) placed in the temple, to all of that being purged of the temple, cleansing of the temple when Jesus returns - is 2300 days.
So if we take the 2300 days from the 2520th day that Jesus will return on (the last day of the 70th week of Daniel) - we get 220. Which means that on day 220 from when the Antichrist confirms the Mt. Sinai covenant in his charade as the Jewish messiah, the 7year cycle law that Moses made in Deuteronomy 31:9-13, 220 days into that 70th week - the temple will be built and animal sacrifices begun again.
The Antichrist will not destroy said temple. It will be standing when Jesus returns. It will not be the real messianic age temple. But it will be a temple dedicated to the worship and praise of the God of Israel - which we can't fault Jews (Judaism) for that intention in wanting the temple built.
That temple, small in size, will probably be destroyed by Jesus at his return, and not be a part of the messianic age temple. Here is why I say that....
The Abomination of Desolation, the image, placed in the temple,
will be animated, appearing to come alive, in Revelation 13. The Abomination of Desolation is also in Daniel 12. What makes that image, a statue in the likeness of the Antichrist appear to take on life, is that it will be incarnated by Satan.
In Ezekiel 28:16-19, the second half of that Chapter, there are some verses about God casting Satan down to earth, and causing a fire to come up in his midst leaving nothing but ashes - which the kings of the earth will actually see Satan in the flesh so to speak.
Which if that statue is in the temple, the temple would have to be crumbled so that the image be exposed which the facade of the image will be melted away and there will be Satan standing exposed
on the temple mount. Before the lone angel descends (Revelation 20) to bind him in chains to take him to the bottomless pit.
*****
Philip, the no-one made a peace agreement "for 7 years" with anyone, including Titus . It does not even make sense to make a peace agreement stipulated to last for 7 years. The Romans did not fulfill Daniel 9:27 because there was no for 7 years peace agreement to start out with - to be broken in the miiddle.
The Romans did fulfill 9:26 in that they destroyed the temple and city - making them the people of the prince who shall come.
The entire idea that the confirms the covenant for 7 years is a peace treaty of some sorts is
not on the right track anyway.
Jews believe that the new covenant in Jeremiahs 31 actually means a renewal of the mt. Sinai covenant. So following Gog/Magog the confirming of the Mt. Sinai covenant for the 7 year term will be that renewal they are looking for (in their eyes). Unfortunately for them it will be by the Antichrist.
If Jews are correct about Jeremiah 31, and it is a renewal of the Mt. Sinai covenant - when did it expire that it has to be renewed?
*****
I am going to agree with you that God made an eternal covenant with the children of Israel that he would be their God and they His people. However, that covenant was never a covenant for eternal life.
The big mistake that Judaism makes is that everyone has eternal life by default - except the very wicked.
Apart from Jesus's death on the cross to remove a person's sins as though they never happened - rejecting him, dying that way, a person dies in their sins, and will not inherit eternal life. There is salvation been made available for mankind because Satan has been judged and will be destroyed - which in justice God will destroy all persons likewise for their sins as well. Don't go down to destruction with Satan.
Which the new covenant in Jeremiah 31 is the one for eternal life.
*****
Jeremiah 31 addresses Israel, however, salvation is made available to all men because all men are sinners.
You need to study more Rabi.
YOU need to learn from the Rabbi..T ( t stands for thoughtless)
sorry rabbi Tovia now I under stand why our lord was so angry when He was here. you are a rabbi ,none. of your class accepted him and He was not altogether interested in your class
Just because your man-god threw a fit, doesn't mean that he was right.