There's some scientist on YT that explains that there wasn't just one big bang, there were many. The period of rapid expansion of space, at the begining of the big bang, where space was expanding faster than light, caused big bangs to occur at equal points, throughout the universe. The extra energy was converted into the matter we see today. Matter is literaly energy that has condensed into physical form. Think of a piece of paper (space) being pulled apart in 4 directions, eventually it rips into squares the points between the squares are a big bang. .. Why can't we see these big bangs? Well, space is so large, that light can't travel fast enough to cover it all. That translates to space being black. Light can't cover it all, with the time it has.
The answer is simple we can not fully comprehend the universe because our brains can’t handle it, it’s like trying to make a mosquito fully understand what is under the Amazon river he sits on top off
Actually we have the exact needed tool for understanding our universe, it’s called mathematics. We only lack information, which we will probably never get, because of the speed of expansion of the universe
If the universe is rotating then we would see alternating sides of it as we look further and further back, averaging the density we see making it seem uniform everywhere we look
Gravity encodes it's presence on everything In essence, gravity’s relationship with energy is profound and multifaceted, influencing everything from the motion of galaxies to the behavior of subatomic particles. This interplay is a cornerstone of modern physics and continues to be an area of active research and discovery. 🌌
this video was really engaging and well-presented! however, i can't help but wonder if the idea of a singular "big bang" is too simplistic. i mean, what if there were multiple events leading to the creation of our universe? it could open up so many more possibilities for understanding cosmic history. what do you all think?
When the biggest black hole eats everything and squeezes it to the size of a pea, it explodes, and all the stars and planets and moons and all the other black holes it eaten come blasting out at the speed of light.. i just solved the puzzle for you all ❤
@TheDavidlloydjones Scientists estimate that there are around 100 million black holes in the Milky Way galaxy: Explanation The Milky Way contains over 100 billion stars, and about one in every thousand is massive enough to become a black hole. However, black holes are difficult to detect because they don't emit light. Evidence Astronomers have found evidence of black holes in a few ways, including: Binary systems: Black holes in binary systems pull gas from a companion star, which can heat up and produce X-rays. Scientists have identified around 50 suspected or confirmed stellar-mass black holes in the Milky Way through binary systems. Isolated black holes: The Hubble Space Telescope has provided direct evidence of an isolated black hole. The black hole was found by measuring its mass after it deflected starlight from a star behind it.
@TheDavidlloydjones and that is just one galaxy.The number of galaxies in the universe is estimated to be between 100 billion and 2 trillion: and a single black hole keeps growing just like the universe maybe the universe is 1 giant black hole and science is I'm right unless you can sciencely prove me wrong 😉 😀 good look that's one heck of a challenge 🤣
@@TheDavidlloydjones Scientists estimate that there are around 100 million black holes in the Milky Way galaxy: Explanation The Milky Way contains over 100 billion stars, and about one in every thousand is massive enough to become a black hole. However, black holes are difficult to detect because they don't emit light.
@@CallanMceknna It's not a question of physics, Callan. It's grammar: there can only be one whole. All your multiple "universes" are just local worlds in some higher dimension. Nothing whole about them. They're impressive in concept, would be impressive in fact if they existed, but they'd still be parts of the whole thing.
I like that part where you discuss branes and then stipulate there could be multiple universes in pairs with one of the pairs having time go forwards, and the other of the pairs time goes backwards.
imagine you're an ant walking on a giant balloon. If the balloon is super, super big, the part the ant can see and walk on looks flat, even though the balloon is actually round. The universe is kind of like that balloon-it might have some curve to it, but because it's so enormous, we only see a small part that feels flat, like the ant on the balloon. Just like the earth is a globe but some ppl think it's flat because it appears flat on the small scale
🧇🧇The behavior of waves in the Universe can be compared to the varying sounds produced by musical drums of different sizes and shapes. Thus, the Universe is flat, but not in the way a sheet of paper is. It's more akin to a vast flat box, reminiscent of Belgian waffles.
Copied from a response to the same question by some random genius: If you heat up a gas, the heat weighs on a scale, if you burn some paper and let the heat escape, the escaping heat makes the combustion products weigh less than if they stayed hot, and if you seal up a nuclear bomb, let it explode, and keep all the products and heat inside the box, the box has the same total mass before and after the explosion. The conversion of energy, kinetic or electromagnetic, to particles with rest mass is experimentally observed only when the energy comes in big enough clumps to create a massive particle, when the energy is low, this is going to be the lightest charged particle, the electron. Electrons can only be created along with a positively charged particle, to conserve charge, and this is almost always a positron (in rare weak interactions you can make an electron, a proton, an antineutron and an electron-antineutrino). The production of electron positron pairs only happens for very hard X-rays, or particles moving with a comparable kinetic energy, and you don't have this much energy in a single particle even in an atomic explosion. You need to accelerate particles specially. Because of this gap between the energy of particles and the energy of the lightest charged particle, you don't usually see conversion of energy to mass in day-to-day life.
@@nickguy8037 Wrong. Ice is still water. Huge amount of energy was demonstrated in atomic bombs explosions. Only few pounds of uranium destroyed city of Hiroshima and later came hydrogen bombs. Few ounces of tritium made that explosion 1000 times more powerful. Total energy would be from antimatter. Study it.
Imagine this… what we call the ‘universe’ is so much larger than we think. what if the universe is so massive, and already existed - ‘big bangs’ happen all the time in other parts of the universe? imagine a square room. what we think is the universe is the bottom left side corner of the room. the room has always existed, big bangs happen all the room all the time - we’re just one of them.
@ oh yeah people will pay for the strangest things 😂 my brother lives in Mexico, he’s English and he loves marmite, so my mum got him this limited edition jar of gold infused Marmite. Another thing is these mega expensive strawberries 🍓 from what I remember they charge hundreds for just one luxury strawberry gift wrapped and delivered to your door. It’s supposed to be the most delicious strawberry in the world, like more strawberry than normal strawberries 🍓 😂
@@user-wb7nv9ht1g yes I agree,they were both about as funny as toothache One is pissing himself at his own rubbish joke,apparently And the other just wants us to know he smokes cannabis ……YAWN
You always want to make it coming from one point if you flatten out your wafers you get two fields and the BB in the hole ( infinite ) stretch in between blew up and broke the surrounding fields ( invisible non matter ) the pieces became rolled up in balls inside all objects
I do not believe that the formation of the universe is a single process. What we have now is the result of trying. In the meantime, it stopped many times. For example. when you light the fireplace and succeed only after several attempts. Or, for example, when life began to form and often died out because it lacked the ability to give birth.
I guess they are trying their best to explain what the think they know but they have no clue how mysterious the universe is. Remember they used to say that the Milky Way galaxy was the hole universe and now there are billions of galaxies. We are not alone , there are 100's of advance civilizations out in the Universe.
I’m struggling with the concept of flatness. Is this to mean if you flew towards Mars and then orientated your ship 90 degrees up, you would run out of space???
You are creating antimatter in your body right now. Potassium is radioactive and a key component of your nervous system. As the potassium in your body decays, antimatter is created.
The Big Bang simply is the breath of God when he spoke: Let there be.. how much time and money has to be spent to realize this? Puzzles me but yeah there it is.
Not possible to go backwards, theorists must accept that if that's true then they will feel correct and our fault, so if that's true we don't know if we are going front or back. So I think it's not correct that theory,
I cant even manage to model how space and time are married. In my mind i know they are woven together but i experience them seperately. Time as duration space as the wind whipping my hair as i ride in the car. The human mind is just limited. Thats why i love Einny sooo much. He could do it. Im just too dumb…:-( ….
The premise is fundamentally flawed. There is no "backwards in time" from T = 0 and the other universe would only be a mirror reflection for an instant...every moment thereafter, the universes will have different "images" If I'm going forward in time and my twin is moving backwards in time, how can we possibly be mirrored images of one another, 5 min later? I would be in a place that didn't exist until just then, whereas they would be 10 min away, 5 min back in time from the point when we were "mirrors." This is nonsensical
Some of this is really bad. The Olbers' Paradox part is terribly dumb. Inverse square law explains the darkness. Some was interesting, but man do I hate AI.
It was focuses consciousness from etheric dimensions above the material realm, consisting of the primeaval atom which caused the big bang expansion. In other words God made it so. But for why ? Just because.
We are the AI and the universe a simulation from an even higher AI, which was also created by an even higher AI. It's AI all the way up and time is a simulation at all levels. We will eventually do the same with AI, and that AI will do the same with It's subsequent AI, and so on.
Most of this is probably absolute cobblers. The obsession with trying to explain a beginning has led to theoretical madness. The uniformity of cosmic background radiation only shows the infinite scale of the universe. If the universe is infinite, then it does not matter where we are within it, it looks the same in all directions. If the universe is finite and had some kind of big-bang beginning, we must see uneven distribution of the CBR. Flatness in this context is not an expression of planer shape, but an expression of uniformity on a large scale, approaching infinity. Where at all the smaller observable scales we see increasing extremes of non-uniformity in arrangements of matter in the universe, from empty space to the intense singularities of supermassive black holes, all driven by the inevitable coalescing consequences of gravity. Is the speed of light really constant, or does it only appear so, relatively… lol. Is the red shift we observe increasingly for distant objects really an indication of universal inflation or is it perhaps more a result of refraction or curvature in time and space, which we do see and measure in gravitational lensing effects.
The universe can appear flat and not be infinite. It only needs to be 250x the size of the observable universe to achieve that… it IS an expression of planar shape, not uniformity. Observed red shift is the consequence of relative motion, universal expansion and gravitational red shift, not gravitational lensing… that does not make sense.
What if the universe started as a black hole, it fed on its giant universe and then finally filled up and then "exoloded" into a supermassive black hole that is bigger on the inside. The space "dust" inside forms new suns and planets...blah blah blah
Imagine ! You are a novel science fiction writer. Dreaming up theories that can't be proven is not science...it is just the conjecture, pontification,and procrastination of the dreamers......so play the Imagine what if game all you want, it is just science fiction.
There's some scientist on YT that explains that there wasn't just one big bang, there were many. The period of rapid expansion of space, at the begining of the big bang, where space was expanding faster than light, caused big bangs to occur at equal points, throughout the universe. The extra energy was converted into the matter we see today. Matter is literaly energy that has condensed into physical form. Think of a piece of paper (space) being pulled apart in 4 directions, eventually it rips into squares the points between the squares are a big bang. .. Why can't we see these big bangs? Well, space is so large, that light can't travel fast enough to cover it all. That translates to space being black. Light can't cover it all, with the time it has.
Yeah it does realy make sense
So he says space is ripping? And these rips are causing other big bangs? But the light from them has not reached us yet?
I adore this narrator! Ive never heard such a southern accent on a science communication piece. It warms my heart.
The answer is simple we can not fully comprehend the universe because our brains can’t handle it, it’s like trying to make a mosquito fully understand what is under the Amazon river he sits on top off
Actually we have the exact needed tool for understanding our universe, it’s called mathematics. We only lack information, which we will probably never get, because of the speed of expansion of the universe
Speak for yourself. I understand everything about the Cosmos! The Hitchikes guide to the galaxy explains it aswell! It really is simple!
And what's under it
If I had some eggs, I could have bacon and eggs, if I had some bacon.
Videos like this make for great sleep 😴. RUclips some how knows I want one every night
Would not both sides be moving forward in time from their own perspective.
Yes. But you're being too sensible for all these romance kiddies.
You probably respect science. That is of no interest to them: they want the Woo.
Exactly what I was thinking. If everything in the opposite universe is opposite, then it's exactly the same and irrelevant. Why stop at two?
@@danielpaskoful: Stopping at two was almost certainly due to the fact that was as high as he could count.
If the universe is rotating then we would see alternating sides of it as we look further and further back, averaging the density we see making it seem uniform everywhere we look
Good lord no
Gravity encodes it's presence on everything
In essence, gravity’s relationship with energy is profound and multifaceted, influencing everything from the motion of galaxies to the behavior of subatomic particles. This interplay is a cornerstone of modern physics and continues to be an area of active research and discovery. 🌌
this video was really engaging and well-presented! however, i can't help but wonder if the idea of a singular "big bang" is too simplistic. i mean, what if there were multiple events leading to the creation of our universe? it could open up so many more possibilities for understanding cosmic history. what do you all think?
The Big Bang was not a singular event. It is/was a process involving many events.
When the biggest black hole eats everything and squeezes it to the size of a pea, it explodes, and all the stars and planets and moons and all the other black holes it eaten come blasting out at the speed of light.. i just solved the puzzle for you all ❤
Wholes? You've found more than one of them?
(But "black whole" was cute...)
@TheDavidlloydjones Scientists estimate that there are around 100 million black holes in the Milky Way galaxy:
Explanation
The Milky Way contains over 100 billion stars, and about one in every thousand is massive enough to become a black hole. However, black holes are difficult to detect because they don't emit light.
Evidence
Astronomers have found evidence of black holes in a few ways, including:
Binary systems: Black holes in binary systems pull gas from a companion star, which can heat up and produce X-rays. Scientists have identified around 50 suspected or confirmed stellar-mass black holes in the Milky Way through binary systems.
Isolated black holes: The Hubble Space Telescope has provided direct evidence of an isolated black hole. The black hole was found by measuring its mass after it deflected starlight from a star behind it.
@TheDavidlloydjones and that is just one galaxy.The number of galaxies in the universe is estimated to be between 100 billion and 2 trillion: and a single black hole keeps growing just like the universe maybe the universe is 1 giant black hole and science is I'm right unless you can sciencely prove me wrong 😉 😀 good look that's one heck of a challenge 🤣
@@TheDavidlloydjones Scientists estimate that there are around 100 million black holes in the Milky Way galaxy:
Explanation
The Milky Way contains over 100 billion stars, and about one in every thousand is massive enough to become a black hole. However, black holes are difficult to detect because they don't emit light.
@@CallanMceknna
It's not a question of physics, Callan. It's grammar: there can only be one whole.
All your multiple "universes" are just local worlds in some higher dimension. Nothing whole about them.
They're impressive in concept, would be impressive in fact if they existed, but they'd still be parts of the whole thing.
I like that part where you discuss branes and then stipulate there could be multiple universes in pairs with one of the pairs having time go forwards, and the other of the pairs time goes backwards.
...except that it's nonsense.
If there are separate "universes," time most certainly goes forward, in the pro-Second Law direction, in both of them.
So you’re saying inflation has been happening since the Big Bang.
Nice eye
The third one
No matter how many times I hear it explained, I still can't wrap my head around what they mean when they say the universe is flat.
The best answer is in your imagination ✨️. I haven't picked up on it yet either. See you on the dark side of the moon.
We live on a piece of paper that is being written backwards
imagine you're an ant walking on a giant balloon. If the balloon is super, super big, the part the ant can see and walk on looks flat, even though the balloon is actually round. The universe is kind of like that balloon-it might have some curve to it, but because it's so enormous, we only see a small part that feels flat, like the ant on the balloon.
Just like the earth is a globe but some ppl think it's flat because it appears flat on the small scale
Might be a spare universe in the trunk.
🧇🧇The behavior of waves in the Universe can be compared to the varying sounds produced by musical drums of different sizes and shapes. Thus, the Universe is flat, but not in the way a sheet of paper is. It's more akin to a vast flat box, reminiscent of Belgian waffles.
Right at the time of BB, we have a mystery, how does pure energy became stable matter?
Copied from a response to the same question by some random genius: If you heat up a gas, the heat weighs on a scale, if you burn some paper and let the heat escape, the escaping heat makes the combustion products weigh less than if they stayed hot, and if you seal up a nuclear bomb, let it explode, and keep all the products and heat inside the box, the box has the same total mass before and after the explosion.
The conversion of energy, kinetic or electromagnetic, to particles with rest mass is experimentally observed only when the energy comes in big enough clumps to create a massive particle, when the energy is low, this is going to be the lightest charged particle, the electron. Electrons can only be created along with a positively charged particle, to conserve charge, and this is almost always a positron (in rare weak interactions you can make an electron, a proton, an antineutron and an electron-antineutrino). The production of electron positron pairs only happens for very hard X-rays, or particles moving with a comparable kinetic energy, and you don't have this much energy in a single particle even in an atomic explosion. You need to accelerate particles specially.
Because of this gap between the energy of particles and the energy of the lightest charged particle, you don't usually see conversion of energy to mass in day-to-day life.
Please type out The Big Bang. BB more commonly stands for… something else…
@@joespinelli2357 Right at the moment of Big Bang, we have a mystery, how does pure energy became stable matter?
@@zvasttry to think of it in the same way that water becomes ice.
Energy and matter are the same thing, just in different states.
@@nickguy8037 Wrong. Ice is still water. Huge amount of energy was demonstrated in atomic bombs explosions. Only few pounds of uranium destroyed city of Hiroshima and later came hydrogen bombs. Few ounces of tritium made that explosion 1000 times more powerful.
Total energy would be from antimatter.
Study it.
Amazes me we can see so far in the past, being so far in the future.
Hunh?
I don't know about you, but I'm in the now.
The future hasn't arrived where I am yet.
Heavy thought
Time does not move in One Direction. Physics shows that time exists all times exist simultaneous. The arrow of time is a creation of the human brain.
Only the window
This is an excellent video with great analysis and commentary.
Didn’t Lister jump start the big bang using the starbug?
Beautiful and fascinating thank you.
Imagine this… what we call the ‘universe’ is so much larger than we think. what if the universe is so massive, and already existed - ‘big bangs’ happen all the time in other parts of the universe? imagine a square room. what we think is the universe is the bottom left side corner of the room. the room has always existed, big bangs happen all the room all the time - we’re just one of them.
What about entropy?
If redshift is from e-m propagation loss, there is no need for expansion or dark matter.
I completely lost any respect I had for the CMB when I learned how they removed the milky way's galactic disc from the image...
Inspiring even to me myself and I. A show that has no ending but answers.
Great video, narrator, soundtrack and well explained!! /me subscribe
Would be better without soundtrack. Soundtracks spoil documentaries, 10 fold!
Imagine space bruh..
imagine grape coolAid and not seasoning
It was me
Could you imagine how expensive bottled lunar ice water is going to be 😒 I can feel it already.
People alrdy buy that gold water, water with gold flakes on it for tons of money so yeah that's gonna be a thing for sure 😂
@ oh yeah people will pay for the strangest things 😂 my brother lives in Mexico, he’s English and he loves marmite, so my mum got him this limited edition jar of gold infused Marmite. Another thing is these mega expensive strawberries 🍓 from what I remember they charge hundreds for just one luxury strawberry gift wrapped and delivered to your door. It’s supposed to be the most delicious strawberry in the world, like more strawberry than normal strawberries 🍓 😂
All these people trying to muscle in on my snake oil buisness.
I can't imagine it's potable
@@BarbarisII bottlable?!
What would restrict the BB to only divide into two mediums
Dark Matter?
@chrischarnik1007: Most likely this is due to the inability of the idiots who dreamed up this nonsense to count any higher than two.
i love a story of universe
It was god sparking a blunt.🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Can confirm cuz I was there 🔥🔥🔥
Just when I thought marijuana didn't cause much brain damage
@@user-wb7nv9ht1g yes I agree,they were both about as funny as toothache
One is pissing himself at his own rubbish joke,apparently
And the other just wants us to know he smokes cannabis ……YAWN
@danwilson1040 Oh Hai Emo Guy
Why only 2 ?
well goooosh darn.
Casuality? Causality.
Is the voice over deliberate?.. me from Texas. Let me tell you about science..
K2-18b maybe habitual for us but far away
You always want to make it coming from one point if you flatten out your wafers you get two fields and the BB in the hole ( infinite ) stretch in between blew up and broke the surrounding fields ( invisible non matter ) the pieces became rolled up in balls inside all objects
Your thumbnail says you've discovered something new never seen....
I do not believe that the formation of the universe is a single process. What we have now is the result of trying. In the meantime, it stopped many times. For example. when you light the fireplace and succeed only after several attempts. Or, for example, when life began to form and often died out because it lacked the ability to give birth.
You final example is an extremely bad one. Life existed for billions of years, reproducing with no problems, long before “giving birth” was a thing.
We can’t handle the answers.
Very good not bad A.I voice s
There are many universe and the multi verse theory is written in vedas and upanishad
I guess they are trying their best to explain what the think they know but they have no clue how mysterious the universe is. Remember they used to say that the Milky Way galaxy was the hole universe and now there are billions of galaxies. We are not alone , there are 100's of advance civilizations out in the Universe.
what goes up must go right can go wrong
So do we walk backwards in the mirror universe? Drive backwards? Eat by taking chewed up food out of our bellies and mouths? I don’t know. .
13:12 Fallout vibes
Inflation explains some things yeah, but what explains inflation?
Finally a southern accent!
I’m struggling with the concept of flatness. Is this to mean if you flew towards Mars and then orientated your ship 90 degrees up, you would run out of space???
No, you just wouldn't get to Mars.
(His "flat" is metaphorical, I think it kinda means iso-everything.)
Doesn't make sense to me either, have never heard it explained fully
yes !
That's a good question
As a Martian I can say the Universe is made entirely of spaghetti.
who has created antimatter?
I have created antimatter in my toilet
You are creating antimatter in your body right now.
Potassium is radioactive and a key component of your nervous system. As the potassium in your body decays, antimatter is created.
if matter cant be destroyed, it just change form, how can time,?
The Big Bang simply is the breath of God when he spoke: Let there be.. how much time and money has to be spent to realize this? Puzzles me but yeah there it is.
Not possible to go backwards, theorists must accept that if that's true then they will feel correct and our fault, so if that's true we don't know if we are going front or back. So I think it's not correct that theory,
Jim Parsons?
I cant even manage to model how space and time are married. In my mind i know they are woven together but i experience them seperately. Time as duration space as the wind whipping my hair as i ride in the car. The human mind is just limited. Thats why i love Einny sooo much. He could do it. Im just too dumb…:-( ….
collage or work?
God lit the firecracker and then (big) bang!
The premise is fundamentally flawed. There is no "backwards in time" from T = 0 and the other universe would only be a mirror reflection for an instant...every moment thereafter, the universes will have different "images" If I'm going forward in time and my twin is moving backwards in time, how can we possibly be mirrored images of one another, 5 min later? I would be in a place that didn't exist until just then, whereas they would be 10 min away, 5 min back in time from the point when we were "mirrors."
This is nonsensical
probably some alcohol, some lies and some bad decisions.
Eve Online Aint ready for me
Gee people have vivid imaginations
...Kaos are root of Jupiter ,Neptune ,Venus....etc
cyber&lawyer Degree?
What is this? Science for cowboys?
Ahh not even an hour in and already on my 6th brawlstar ad. I just wanna sleep.
tbh even 2 mirror universe will only travel forward in time...dont be foolish
Those kepler worlds Belongs to our universe are other universe ???????😅😅😅😅
My goodness. I came up with this same hypothesis 20 years ago.
Some of this is really bad. The Olbers' Paradox part is terribly dumb. Inverse square law explains the darkness. Some was interesting, but man do I hate AI.
It was focuses consciousness from etheric dimensions above the material realm, consisting of the primeaval atom which caused the big bang expansion. In other words God made it so. But for why
? Just because.
Nothing can come from nothing
Dude sounds like a crooked southern televangelist.
We are the AI and the universe a simulation from an even higher AI, which was also created by an even higher AI. It's AI all the way up and time is a simulation at all levels. We will eventually do the same with AI, and that AI will do the same with It's subsequent AI, and so on.
God said it to be and it was .
Which God
At this point, suggestions that we have been to the moon seem so far-fetched that it is borderline laughable
What's laughable aren't the moon visits.
What's laughable aren't the moon visits.
Most of this is probably absolute cobblers. The obsession with trying to explain a beginning has led to theoretical madness. The uniformity of cosmic background radiation only shows the infinite scale of the universe. If the universe is infinite, then it does not matter where we are within it, it looks the same in all directions. If the universe is finite and had some kind of big-bang beginning, we must see uneven distribution of the CBR. Flatness in this context is not an expression of planer shape, but an expression of uniformity on a large scale, approaching infinity. Where at all the smaller observable scales we see increasing extremes of non-uniformity in arrangements of matter in the universe, from empty space to the intense singularities of supermassive black holes, all driven by the inevitable coalescing consequences of gravity. Is the speed of light really constant, or does it only appear so, relatively… lol. Is the red shift we observe increasingly for distant objects really an indication of universal inflation or is it perhaps more a result of refraction or curvature in time and space, which we do see and measure in gravitational lensing effects.
The universe can appear flat and not be infinite. It only needs to be 250x the size of the observable universe to achieve that… it IS an expression of planar shape, not uniformity.
Observed red shift is the consequence of relative motion, universal expansion and gravitational red shift, not gravitational lensing… that does not make sense.
i did
astroTraning Camp?
GOD!
One more video before bed
Is there any evidence of this. No.
It was a ⏰
and then make the next goal pluto?
Not a big bang , more a big bong
Nuthin' big about it: it's the Original Tiny.
M theory is 💯 true... With a slight twist. Just saying...
God is the answer you’re looking for
Which God?
God😊
While I really do enjoy this channel, it's just hard to listen to Trace Adkins talk science and astronomy and take it seriously...
Time doesn't exist.
GOD DID
We are in Peter Griffins imagination 😂
Idk but dmt gonna show me
What’s with all the moody watch ads suddenly?
1% will swing B Ack
Combustion.
What if the universe started as a black hole, it fed on its giant universe and then finally filled up and then "exoloded" into a supermassive black hole that is bigger on the inside. The space "dust" inside forms new suns and planets...blah blah blah
lol nice bro. You got it 🫠
According to hinduism the universe has everlasting circles, and one is about 312 trillion years.
Imagine ! You are a novel science fiction writer. Dreaming up theories that can't be proven is not science...it is just the conjecture, pontification,and procrastination of the dreamers......so play the Imagine what if game all you want, it is just science fiction.
will need Emergency evac and police?
It ido