Are There Any Habitable Exoplanet ?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- Are we alone in the universe, or are there habitable planets out there waiting to be discovered? Join us as we delve into the fascinating world of exoplanets, exploring groundbreaking discoveries from NASA's Kepler mission, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), and other revolutionary space observatories.
Discover the science behind the Goldilocks Zone-where conditions might be just right for life-and uncover the mysteries surrounding planets like Kepler-22b. From cutting-edge telescopes to the latest advancements in astronomy, this documentary takes you on a thrilling journey to find out if another Earth could exist in the vast cosmos.
It doesn’t matter if exoplanets are habitable or not- they are ridiculously too far away from us to ever visit them. Proxima B is only 4.5 light years away but would take tens of thousands of years to get there with our fastest spacecraft!
Exactly. The sad truth is that we're most probably bound to stay on Earth till the eventual death of our star provided something else doesn't doom us before that. Even if we would be capable to create a spacecraft which could travel at a reasonable fraction of the speed of light it would still take hundreds of years to visit the star system in our immediate neighbourhood. Earth is our oyster.
@ Carl Sagan expressed this sentiment wholeheartedly in his Pale Blue Dot speech piece. This planet is all we got! We could possibly colonize our Solar System on Mars, Titan, and mine Asteroids, but beyond that, interstellar travel is just Sci-Fi!
I'd like to see us get out into the solar system first. Maybe when we have a colony on Pluto we can start thinking about heading out to the stars in generational ships, but let's see what's in our backyard up close and not just planetary probes.
@@JDEhlert Those would have to be humongous ships the size of a huge asteroid or smaller dwarf planet with arable soil inside, a biosphere and self-sustainable breathable atmosphere and water. That's theoretically possible. One huge obstacle to that is human kind's petty nature, there will most probably never be an incentive to do so. The costs would be immeasurable. I'n afraid that society would never agree to pay for it.
@@wackyruss That speech seriously made me cry. Every single word he uttered was so carefully crafted, it all connects so seamlessly into a truly inspirational piece of art. Sagan was a pearl.
These videos are so weird because sometimes they’ll hit me in a way that will make me calm like “oh wow we’re so small and the universe is so big” and other times they’ll make me really anxious like “oh wow we’re so small and the universe is so big”
The only thing bigger than the universe is the human ego.
Let’s take care of the planet we live on now
Less than 10 likes. That says all about us.
ha! you're asking too much from us.
much more exciting to bend space and time than recycle :)
We have come a long way from where we were. I’m actually proud of how much has been accomplished.
We'd rather carry on polluting this wonderful paradise and then throw it away rather than doing the washing up . Like throwing away a disposable barbecue.
Doesn't matter, Sun will eventually die and it will take Earth with it. Just live your life to the fullest & accept that things eventually meet their end.
We are built for 1g within a very small temperature range require sunlight from our local star and to breathe the atmosphere specific to Earth.
I want 600 g’s so I can become a super sand
And yet we went to the moon and people have lived for over a year in Earth orbit at reletive 0 g. Kind of blows your theory out of the water. We can - and have - adapted.
@@rbilleaud A dubious Cold War tall tale from the late 60s about landing on the moon that has not been repeated in fifty years because it is impossible to do safely is almost specifically not "adapting". And everyone who has spent that long just in near earth orbit has developed osteoperosis and other health problems. There's a good reason we're only sending probes further than that. Technology doesn't get bored and can survive it longer than we can.
Just imagine: an exoplanet with no traffic, no bills, and no Mondays...
Like Robinson Caruso, it’s primitive as can be.
imagine! an exoplanet your 1000th grandchild will love after 999 generations of them disown you on an angry biodome ship and radiate into blob DNA that oozes out of the escape hatch when it gets there.. for this reason, i think frozen shield-protected vessels of sperm and eggs with robots to take care of them would be more ideal. the physics of space travel vs our wishes for it is more laughable than someone who pretends to wear a cape and fly around. it just has to be another person who gets to live there, so no big deal -- its still humans. just, not us. Earth is our planet, so we are the luckiest ones.
The irs will be there wanting 1/3 of your rocks.
A nice place to live is a lovely daydream.
Venus has those characteristics.
Crazy how there are so many planets that are placed so perfectly apart & so hard for any being or possible being from any planet to reach?!?!
Hard or impossible for us but there could be beings out their millions even billions of years more technologically advanced than we are.. A hop to the nearest star could be no more hassle to them than you driving your car to get a pizza..
So you think...
The weren't placed but formed.
@@dannicatzer305 Then why aren’t they here?
This is hands down my favourite channel to chill to and take my mind off things. Something I really need right now. Thank you.
Same here, just waiting for them to find another place to move to without earths problems waiting the next morning when i wake up. 😅
You just gave me an idea, now let me sleep on it
Not even close.
Crap AI narrator....but you get what you pay for.
The thumbnail was ripped straight from kyplanet
Then watch Kyplanet. He’s even better.
We are too stupid to go to space. We are still building aircraft carriers and hypersonic missiles and new main battle tanks. And sometimes we even argue about which bathroom we should go to. We are not going f****** anywhere.
True, we're too busy destroying each other. Like that alien preacher said on that episode of "the outer limits:" "i have every confidence that you'll destroy yourselves before you build your 1st interstellar engines. WE GOT NOTHING TO FEAR FROM YOU!!"
Ufos and aliens. Lmao I bet if they do visit us they take one look and see the nukes and wars on going and just leave because they already know we are going to destroy our selves. We are pathetic In a general sense with war, genocide and much more. We only have few extremely intelligent humans who change the way we think but majority is cause our downfall. Rip
FACT!
We are still fighting over ancient religions and customs, that mean nothing. Now we are electing buffoons to lead us.....into oblivion!
On the flipside, I'm sure we'll be glad our weapons systems are as developed as they are should we have hostile visitors.
Simple statistic says there are plenty of habitable exoplanets out there since the universe is unfathomably big and maybe even infinite. Still they may be so far away from us that we'll never be able to reach them.
statistic only describes the surface. a lot “habitable” using only goldilock zone to determined turns out to be a lifeless planet orbiting red dwarf. every goddamn time. so there’s much more factor for a planet to be considered habitable, oxygen, rocky, liquid, water, right temp, good weather. or even other multi complex organism. don’t ever think we would be able to terraform or produced light speed travel accross the universe until we found a way to cure cancer & HIV.
Yeah, but moons of Jupiter like Europa may have life
The gap between us and them is getting larger too. While at the same time another galaxy is headed straight for ours
@@OneEyedCloud01 I still find it hard to believe that we never will be able to meet intelligent life from other worlds.....yes, they are far away from us but there is always a way to find ways to 'shorten those distances' in ideas that we have never thought of yet...
@@natedogs212 I'm still waiting to find intelligent life on this planet
Leave the exoplanets alone. They living tax free without Mondays.
Perfect vid for bed! Hopefully I won't wake up on an exoplanet. 😂
But you’re already on an exoplanet from alien’s pov🤓
Get the lucid dreams going and away you go lol
@@infobeam1902 Yeehaw!
Life, conscience, sapience, sentience, the universe, and the scientific laws that controls them are the products of intelligent design rather than a cosmic accident.
It's literally the first video I've ever not watched to know the outcome. The title screen and the description counter each other, and it gives me all the info I need without having to watch an hour long video. 😂
The title is a question, not a claim
@markcintron8267 but the title card states, "There are no habitable exoplanets." That being my point of the contradicting description.
@ right you are friend, and I clearly didn’t read the words on the thumbnail lol, and now I get to feel stupid 🤤😂
For decades, the scientists kept telling us that Earth wasn't special, that there would be thousands of earth like planets in the milkyway. Well, in fact, it would appear Earth is extremely special and rare.
When the next-generation Roman Space Telescope becomes operational, we may finally gain clearer insights into this matter. It's possible that a new planet will be discovered, but it could be located so far away that our civilization will be unable to reach it before we are gone.
Where did you get your info or you just invented on your own mind human mind weak limited. All answers should have basis
@@TheApplications1 This is the basic of Fermi Paradox and it is still valid untill today.
They're probably 100% wrong about k218b. Its probably a world of despair like Venus
Most of us want life like us, Vulcans we can trade and learn from. If scientists discover a single celled creature, it would be interesting, dkes it have the same DNA as us? Does it even use DNA? These questions are huge for biologists and geneticists, not so much for the average person.
To find a technological race a million things have to go exactly right. Take the fact that we are carbon based. That means the molecules in are body are chained together by long chains of carbon. You've probably heard that silicone life forms may exist, too. Put another way, there are 98 naturally occuring elements in the universe and 96 of them cannot be the basis of life under any circumstances. Silicone has a shot, but its a very meager shot. Like homeless bum dating Jong Ho-yeon, meager.
Silicone can form ling chains and is very able to bond with many elements like carbon, but it cannot bond to itself so it cannot for molecules with loops, like carbon can. It is also considerably heavier than carbon (as such things a measured on a molecular level), and so the chains it creates cannot be as long and hence complex as carbon. Lastly, if carbon bonds with the very abundant element oxygen, you get carbon monoxide, a gas. If you bond silicone with oxygen you get sand. A solid. So while they say silicone is a possibility, it is so unlikely as to be less than a 1% chance.
Try this thought experiment, they say there are a 100 billion stars in the galaxy so take a 100 billion monkeys randomly hitting keys on a keyboard. How many produce a perfectly readable document of 858 pages long? That is a monkey typing 1 million characters in exactly the right order. Im not even specifying the same story as us, just any legible readable document. I'm amazed that we were ever written.
How completely insane of us to believe our only hope to survive depends on inhabiting another world , rather than looking after this one .
Habitable does not necessary mean habitable for men. There will be numerous planets habitable for alien life but not for us.
Once the human element stops being so arrogant as to think life in other circumstances MUST resemble our own....they may consider planets we would consider inhospitable for life. It wasn't long ago they thought life was impossible in our oceans depths.
I agree 💯
How are we going to find something that we cant see? We only know what life is here, so this is the only parameter.
Is the same thing as trying to search every rock in the planet because, maybe, rocks are a form of life, but we don't see then as such
People have always known the oceans contained life. You have a religious faith that life exists outside of earth.
@@i-frames816 some people consider fire is a life from. Scientist said, none of these planet has fire on it. All exo planet we found, there is no fire like in our planet.
We're finding that Earth-like planets (rocky planets in their star's habitable zone) are far from rare. There could be millions just in our galaxy.
The chances that none of them are habitable are pretty low.
Not millions, there may be billions of rocky planets in the goldilock zones in the Milky Way. There are half a billion stars in our galaxy.
They still need to be reasonable in composition, can’t be tidally locked, orbit a stable type of star, very close in mass to earth, etc. I have a hard time believing anything will be ready for us without some terraforming. And it begs the question whether artificial habitats will be far more economical to create (and operate out of).
Space travel…a 21st century solution to a 25th century problem 📚✌🏽
And it's crazy that venus & mars may both have had an atmosphere like ours here on earth & both of them eventually lost it? Imagine earth moving like mars or backwards rotating venus?
Love this video all animated so beautifully. Paused & screenshot a lot for mobile wallpaper.
But it doesn't answer the question. It is just 90 minutes of irreverent information.
The truth is that
We are alone and nobody can saves us from ourselves
There is no place like home. It doesn’t matter if any worlds out there might have life. There is no way of getting there, or for us to communicate with them outside of hundreds of thousands of years. Even if we detected a planet that might have live, if we detected intelligence, that would be from only the far off past. By the time we detect them, they probably already went extinct. Besides, how would we know any information sent to us was given just to cause our own extinction? So now that we have never been so close to conquering space, how should we use it? If we want to be a multi-planet race, we need to decide to do so and turn closer rocky bodies into Earth 2. Or, start mining planets like Mars for raw materials that we can turn into habitable equipment and materials. To start, what we learn by moving out into space should be used to discover better ways of living on Earth.
True, but it is subject to improved technology as well. Flight used to be impossible too.
@ absolutely correct however, there are roadblocks put in place called physics. A German scientist by the name of Albert Einstein gave us General Relativity and Special Relativity. There is no way matter will ever reach the speed of light. Perhaps one day we might figure out how matter can move as fast or faster than light but right now, with what we have learned, it’s impossible. It would require infinite mass and energy the only object I know of would be a singularity.
@@jroar123 Yes, and people are too heavy to fly. None of this will be solved with Einstein, who BTW stole everything from the patent office he was working at and is yet another "scientific' fraud, and traditional physics. We need a new idea based on more advanced understanding, not the old ideas ballooned up.
April 5, 2063…the Vulcans will answer all our questions!
No we won't
The thumbnail is literally just Kyplanet's but worse. That being said i love both and i love the length
I love Leaning exoplanets
We can't reach any significant % of the speed of light to think about traveling to any other star systems.
However, if there is life out there, we wouldn't know it. WE might be looking at each other through telescopes right now, but all we can see is our planets in very distant past. Somebody from Andromeda galaxy may be looking at Earth and seeing monkeys and primates instead of humans :D
True 😂
Monkeys are primates.
We need to think long term and aim to send out generation ships
@dongsolong9032 that'll never happen. It would be unethical to doom the generations that would live and die between the stars.
@@sapphonymph8204 seems like a perfect use for AI
I mean it is not so basic the volume of planers but (being on the habitable zone) MUST rotate for creating a magnetic field and distributing the heat if their own star!!! 👏 👏
If nobody has figured it out by now the entire platform to which we live is incredibly unique almost unbelievable that everything could fall into place to allow life as we know it.The chances of recreating a similar planet and it's surroundings has to be unfathomable impossible we would ever see it find it or even be alive once it did manifest itself.
This planet is over 6 billion years old has gone through several incredible phases so incredible that imagine we did find a planet that could possibly sustain life how many billion years before it actually happens would Earth still exist?
I doubt earth like water planets are rare at all on a galactic scale..
So we can measure a minuscule wobble in a star light years away with complete accuracy and we assume it’s a planet?😂
Personal incredulity is not a valid argument for anything. Such discoveries have been thoroughly investigated and peer reviewed. If you want to dismiss such findings, then you have to come up with alternative explanations for the observations and support them with evidence. Can you do that?
@ Give me what those scientists get in public funding and I could. ☝️💩
Great video.
For all the planets we've discovered not a one is a spot on fit. That's not to say there are planets that don't fit any form of life but nothing even comes close to our requirements let alone another Earth. However there are still uncountable numbers of planets out there to be explored.
There may be one. It’s just very very far away. So… to us, there are zero.
Probably got the same old stuff that goes on here on earth just a different galaxy there
There are so many exoplanets out there that statistically There should be many planets with the same atmosphere the same amount of water and land masses of earth
There is one other criteria that is needed for a habitable exoplanet that I don't even hear enter conversation and that is part that we live on a dynamo, so how many sweet spot planets also have a giant Dynamo at it's center. I would think that would reduce number habitable planets where life exists.
It astounds me that people can say in good faith that there isn't any habitable worlds, it is the height of ignorance.
Not bragging, but I happen to live on one.
Venusian skies offer a very thick layer of mostly nitrogen that’s about 70 degrees and is illuminated during the day. Floating cities really would work there and are manageable on current blimp technology. You just have to get past the surfacism.
The more I reason over these themes, the more I came to conclusion that, not only for mere survival, but to really become an advanced civilization, a species have to achieve at least two of the three key technologies to master space.
FTL technology, to travel across the stars in acceptable times.
Terraforming technology, to literally build new habitable planets in space.
Complex genetics, to be sure that the species will be enough resilient to survive in places that are different from the home planet.
Without one of these three technologies, whatever species will just die in its home star system before being able to fluorish.
After all we humans can't travel for millions of years just to hope to find a planet that maybe will have breathable atmosphere and liquid water on its surface, but that after so much time it will be surely changed, and even if we are able to get there, settle, something like radiations, native life forms or virus or everything can simply wipe out our colonists.
That is simply not acceptable.
So we must get those three techs.
This stuff is so interesting
Great start to the day!
Why do I get this feeling that R2-D2 & C-3PO Name all these new discovered planets.
Imagine discovering how to successfully living on Mars and discovering a rouge planet, totally frozen into a snowball passing just outside our solar system. We take the Mars tech and land it on the rouge to set up a moving outpost. That planet would be the best way to bounce from solar system to solar system.
Still not viable. You'd still have to travel light years to the nearest solar system. And that planet would frozen with no sunlight whatsoever for life etc. It would be like trying to live on Pluto and then worse. Damn near impossible.
If a life bearing planet was detected, we could send a high speed probe and then wait 500 years for the results.
It's funny how astronomers calculate living conditions on planets v habitable zones. Our Sun has three, right? That' s what astronomers from nearby star estimate.
Even Earths's neighborhood is too far to make such guess
Huh ? Astronomers from nearby star ? Whatchu talking bout?
So now we have some statistics: 12,000 exoplanets found, zero habitable by humans.
Earths:1 , non-Earths: 12,000.
Odds dont seem too good. Our solar system seems pretty special now.
We need to look at solar systems with stars like our own or bigger. Anything smaller would have planets tidal locked in one direction, always facing the sun.
Every planet has some kind of life
Habilitality is moot. It shoudlbe deemed "habilitability as we know on Earth". Not all life that does or can exist would necessarily be like what we know on Earth. You make a valid point about extremophiles, but they still have the same basic chemistry as other life. All life is descended from the earliest organisms, so shares the same basic chemical structures. If extremophiles were placed on the Moon or Jupiter, could they survive? possibly, but not for very long.
Humanity had its chance! 🥳❤ 🌴 🔥 🧊 ⛈️ 😇
Imagine that life existed on Venusmat some point, but any proof of existence has been obliterated by the harsh extreme atmosphere of the present day. We would never know.
It is entirely possible that no planet in the universe (besides Earth) is truly "habitable" for humans in the strictest sense-meaning naturally suited for human life without extensive technological intervention. Even if a promising exoplanet were detected using the most advanced remote sensing methods available, confirming its actual suitability for human habitation would require far more than spectral analysis and atmospheric modeling.
At minimum, a fleet of highly capable robotic probes would need to travel within close proximity of the planet to conduct precise measurements. Even then, the only definitive way to assess its habitability would be to land on its surface and carry out extensive biological, geological, and climatological surveys.
Basic conditions for human survival-such as temperature, atmospheric composition, and radiation levels-could, in theory, be inferred with high confidence through remote sensing. However, probabilistic inference is not the same as absolute certainty. The sheer complexity of any terrestrial ecosystem means that even after decades of human colonization, unforeseen hazards-whether microbial pathogens, geological instabilities, or long-term climatic shifts-could still emerge.
Given these challenges, achieving definitive knowledge of a truly "habitable" exoplanet is unlikely for centuries-perhaps even a millennium or more.
Even if it were possible to travel to these planets, which it isn't, it is obvious that 99. 999999% would be incompatible with terrestrial life. Even those impossibly rare planets which have a similar Biome to Earth, would inevitably be incompatible with Earth life. I think people fail to realise how we as human beings, are an integral part of the unique biology of our planet. Life undoubtedly exists elsewhere, but it's foolish to believe it would be anything like us.
If there are, they will have to come to us. We are to primtive to reach practically anything.
Aren't most of the exoplanet's we found orbiting their stars in a matter of days? That puts them fairly close to their star. Realistically there should be more planets in each solar system we've identified exoplanets but since they should take much longer to complete their orbits we don't see them. For every exoplanet found there should be several other planets and moons in each of those solar systems. Considering the amount of stars in a galaxy the odds of there not being habitable planets or moons would be very low just for our galaxy.
Yes, but none within 1000 light years of Earth
Warp drive will be discovered soon
Exoplanets that exist within the habitable zone of the star they are orbiting contain water. This introduces the possibility of ecology being kickstarted and microorganisms to exist within that specific environment. While these planets might not be habitable for humans it’s still within the habitable zone and therefore an ecosystem that allows vegetation and plant life can harbor bacteria and microorganisms to exist within that environment and therefore those microorganisms could adapt and evolve into macro organisms that also adapt to that specific environment, these macro organisms then evolve into creatures that exist within this specific environment and therefore become an indication of life… while it may not be intelligent life, it’s still life nonetheless🤷🏾♂️
You forgot the S in Exoplanets in the title.
Maybe he’s Indian
@@your_doctor_and_plumber And?
@@FromNothing meaning he doesn’t know how to pluralize words
@@your_doctor_and_plumber Yes and I just corrected him.
@ no you’re being racist
one could suspect that the chances of intelligent or sapient life in the universe are slim. But there could be many worlds with microbes or similar less developed life.
All habitable planets probably have life of some kind. Since life takes billions of years to evolve to intelligent beings they can be anywhere in that line of evolution. Even if we sent Intelligent robot ships to distant worlds we would be long gone before they can report back. We have reached the limit of progress as have any other intelligent life across all galaxies. Seti is looking for the impossible.
51:00- When that “promising” world is so hostile, it would kill tardigrades instantly.
They are not habitable PERIOD, WE ARE ALONE!
@sgtbrown4273 you need to rethink you spelling and understanding of what his comments said. And when you add your comment you only .ale your point not valid at a higher level.
@@ExcavationNation The search for life outside our solar system is still in its infancy. Despite the sensationalized depictions online, we don’t have high-resolution images of exoplanets. In reality, our knowledge of these planets is limited to indirect data, such as measurements of their orbits and light patterns. Furthermore, we’ve received no data from outside or even within our galaxy because transmitting information across such vast distances would take millions of years. To observe anything, you’d need to be perfectly positioned at the right angle and time, which is an astronomical improbability. Concluding that we are alone in the universe based on this lack of data and time is not just premature, it’s downright ignorant.
125 years ago the vast majority of people on the planet would probably have told you there would never be heavier than air flight. We are in the infancy of deep space exploration using the least powerful instruments we will ever have at our disposal going forward and with technology improving at a geometric rate I find it highly unlikely that we won't have found several habitable worlds by the end of the century.
If we are the only life in this universe, then maybe we are trully the children of a creator. If so, then it might be up to us to turn those planets into habital locations, along with seeding them with life. Maybe that is our purpose that we should be working towards?
I wonder if residents of a tidally locked planet would believe they lived on a flat planet?
Just to give you an example of how big the universe is, the nearest galaxy is over 2million light years away. In the sci fi show star trek we can go warp 9 which is 81 times the speed of light. at that speed it would still take over 2,000 years to reach. In the real world our fastest speed is 1,000th the speed of light
Of course there is , absolutely Billions id say . We've only just woken up in the last 300years, im certain life is abundant in the universe, its just so vast lifes going to be hard to find.
seems like they have to rethink their theories on the universe every 20 years
Video thumbnail is literally ripped directly from kyplanet
Finally someone noticed lol
For american friends , too big means it will have massive gravity that will crush your body or fk it up in the long run
What's the name of that song used in the background in the beginning? I swear I've heard it before
All the people on this comment list saying that we will never be able to reach any of these planets - how do they know that? Who knows what we will be capable of in one, two or three hundred years time? (Provided, that is, we do not wipe ourselves out). It is people like them that would have us still living in caves.
Not sure about habitable, but there should surely be planets that are easier to terraform than venus or mars.
Forget exoplanets, they are not within our reach. But if we can see those exoplanets by photographs and see some intelligent living beings over those exoplanets,it will be fun to observe this--- despite not being capable of reaching those exoplanets!! It is mind-boggling, how extensive the COSMOS is. HECK,THE CREATOR has built such a massive UNIVDRSE indeed. HALLE-LU-YAH. YAH-JEHO-WAH.
maybe we don't have the proper senses to recognize our next step?
just because we naturally have five senses doesn't mean that's what's needed
About 7 thousand planets are already known. And so far none is an Earth 2.0. During its lifetime, the James Weeb Space Telescope is expected to discover a planet that is very similar to Earth (it is impossible to find a planet exactly like it), that hosts life, even if it is just simple life. So far, not a single planet that is even remotely similar to Earth has been found. This means that the more planets we discover and these planets are not are not similar to Earth, transform our planet into a rarity. So far we don't know how many of the thousands of planets in the Milky Way are even vaguely similar to Earth. We don't know if it will be 1 in 10 thousand, 1 in 100 thousand or 1 in a million. It was only recently that we began to scrutinize the planets around us. The truth is that so far there is no Earth 2.0, many planets are located in the right zone around your planet to support life, but there is always a catch. Either they are too big, or they are covered in water, or they have a different orbit, or they have the same side facing their sun, or they circle stars that are very different from ours. One thing is certain, what we have discovered so far makes our planet a rarity and in fact no one knows what it takes for a planet to develop intelligent life. The only certainty is that it takes time and stability and a planet with conditions similar to ours. This is despite the fact that we do not know whether life can emerge in completely different environments.
There is not just the question is there now! a exoplanet that is habitable for us, furthermore was or will there be one to live on. That makes it even more unrealistic that there should not be a suitable one for us. Reaching it not taken in consideration.
What happens if we find another 50,000 planets and none of them have any life.
Feels like earth was designed for humans.
Not too big, not to stoney, not to frosty, not too hot. The earth tilt too
There is many planets out there. The earth isn't 1 of a few. There are many planets and earth just happened to be the one we live in. It could of happened to any other solar system.
The earth wasn t habitable 1 billion years ago. We just happened to be here because our planet got better. And the earth will ony stay habitable for a short time, few billions of years.
The only chance we will ever leave this planet is when we upload our minds to a computer and leave the body behind. It will eradicate the need for food, fuel and going at light speed. We can just sleep eternally until we get where we need to go.
Maybe life is just sleeping androids uploading memories of how life used to be so we don't forget when we do get to planet Earth 2.0
Answer to the title question, yes likely to be millions if not more across the universe but you don't have to be a Einstein to know we have only found 0.0000000000000000000001% of the planets out there so far
I don't deny they have found planets around other stars but they could just as easily be brown dwarf stars and of course they have found absolutely none exactly like our earth well not as yet anyway
Hello everybody
We know, we know, it's COVERED. And so what? Who cares? It doesn't matter! Why? Because we cannot get there in human time, even assuming a lightspeed drive is invented tomorrow. Focus on what you can improve here and now, for people around you.
How about exo-moons? There must be large moons out there. Some think Mars was an escaped moon of Jupiter.
If the search is limited to red dwarves which 99% of these explanets orbit then i wouldnt hold your breath searching for an earth like planet. The tech to detect an earthsize planet around a sunlike star simply does not exist yet even james is incapable of that.
Idk I think conditions for life be it similar to us or not at all are not met often in space. And then there is time. Like probably there was or will be life somewhere somewhen millions of lightyears away. It’s so damn unlikely that we will ever get a glimpse of that with our conception of time. Ist not the missing possibilities in places but rather the time is not met. And then there are still a lot of special things about earth. A LOT. Like we are super lucky that the earth is where it is and how it is. We wouldn’t be here if there were no moon, no Jupiter, no astroid belt, no massive iron core - we hit the jackpot, don‘t know the next time it will be hit, nor the last.
And as much as I cherish our curiosity we managed so far to store information in our species for merely a few thousand years. We can‘t even grasp the vastness of time. But we‘re hoping to colonise other planets… to find life in maybe after the sun exploded? To think we can even survive that long as a species as we are driving our own environment that ist actually existing into being inhabitable. Nah don‘t think so. This is a dream, nothing more. Subjective observation : humans are bizarre
The big question is, how the hell are we going to get to these planets.
Easy! Just shoot through a wormhole. 😊
Wormhole literally seems like the only way unless we can convert ourselves to light
@Aeom_333 wormholes do not exist in nature. And to artificially creat one would take ridiculous amounts of energy. People watch too much sci fi
We don't.
@michaeldowd8422 I think what I mean is the hole you'd go through when bending spacetime (teleportation) which I guess isn't really a hole but I'm thinking about the bended paper example
Ha. Dimming with age 😂 like me. And you. We must definitely be stars! Then again we kind of are just babies from stars aaaahhh star babies 🌝⭐️💜 🌚✨🌟 👶🏻 chiiildren of the wooorld. Take ma strong hand child 😂 sorry I veered off track there!
The only planets we can detect are massive ones. Most planets have no meaningful effect on the brightness or wobble of its star (or stars). So, we just see tbr big inhospitable planets.
Answer
NO.
"Never never never" we were never going to fly, never going to go to space, never split the atom and never go to the moon. Never.
And we'll never have a video sharing platform on the internet where you can post comments either.
Multi planetary stock market pitch.
I don't wanna be that nerd who says "something something Bobiverse scenario maybe maybe probably not but maybe!' Well fine, I will be. Someone else probably said it already!
H2o is the hardest part, the rest will follow. Snowball effect
I for one don’t believe we really went to space but even so, we will never be able to travel that far
only 4.5 light years away...
How can he makes assumptions that there is no life on exoplanets with out vusiting it . Its impossible to visit
This is just instrument bias, as far as we know. What is the lower limit for size we can detect? We’re still only able to look at a small slice of what could be out there.
Truth is we have no idea. The best we can do is identify the pixels that represent a far away planet and use spectral data to make a good guess of its makeup. Anything beyond that, like these images that show land and water are pure fiction.