Top 10 Most Powerful Fighter Jet Radars (2021)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 июн 2024
- Check out the Military playlist from the Buzz: • 10 Most Expensive Mili...
------------
Video description: Advanced Fighter jets are not only equipped with advanced weaponry, powerful engines to give better performances and so on. But one very important system that is equipped in every fighters is Radar which is able to detect, track, and identify many targets quickly and at long ranges, and to operate in hostile electronic warfare environments. Few countries are making additional modern advanced radar to compete with their competitors.
Fighter radars are classified into two types: mechanically and electrically scanning. The latter are classified into three types: passive scanning, active scanning, and hybrid tilters. An active electronically scanned array is a sort of phased array antenna, which is a computer-controlled array antenna in which radio wave beams may be electrically directed to point in different directions without moving the antenna. Each antenna element in the AESA is linked to a compact solid-state transmit/receive module (TRM) controlled by a computer, which performs the tasks of a transmitter and/or receiver for the antenna. In contrast, a passive electronically scanned array (PESA) connects all of the antenna components to a single transmitter and/or receiver through phase shifters controlled by a computer. The primary use of AESA is in radar, which is known as active phased array radar.
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com. 
Развлечения
I've been waiting for this video.
Missing the uttam AESA radar
@V. J truuuuuu
@V. J k
AESA in use Gripen?
@@claudionazareth8766 ya it is attack radar which cannot be intercepted
please make a video on top countries who Surrender during the war.🙏 still no one has make these type content yet. request from uttarakhand (dehradun).
We all know the French will be number 1
@@vector150 no lol. europens only know about french
but legends know it was Pakistan. 93000 soldiers and 3000 killed within 1 day by india during 1971
@@vector150 ghar k paas Pakistan hai 93k k saath 1 no par
@@xyz-iz2kfno one cares and no one likes the french
It's going to be France because in ww2 it took nazi Germany only 6 weeks to capture France and surrendered immediately...
Top 10 Most Powerful Battleship Radars Pleaseee
Aah... I was waiting for this.... Soooo looonngg.....!! Finally......!!❤️👍
Possibly just as important to the detection range, and maybe even more important, is the range that you can get a track. You need to be able to track a target (aka target lock) before you can fire at it. That can be much lower than the detection range.
Also, the range given is meaning less with out giving the radar crass section of the target. A radar that can detect a 5 m^2 target at 200 km is not bette rthan a radar that can detect a 1 m^2 target at 150 km.
Underrated comment. It's like saying my car accelerates up to 100 km/h (60mph) in a matter of seconds.
Point you to a crucial point! This is why the Rafale and its RBE2-AA radar often outclass adversaries with a much more powerful radar but much less precise and which hangs much less.
It's something that the Indians have seen with the arrival of this new platform, is that in simulated combat their Rafales literally spray their Sukhoi 30 MkI.
Basically this platform was to serve as a bomber, but obviously it is also doing very well, with the meteor to ensure the supremacy of India over China and the Pakistani.
Much better than their Sukhoi with this huge radar which hangs on nothing but can be heard, can be detected from far away.
@@RIRI-el6xm JSF were meant to be multirole from the start (A2A/A2G), turned out to be Omnirole.
Key design parameters required JSF to match or out-perform the F-16 & F/A-18, which they have demonstrated.
The F-16 is one of the most lethal 4th Gen fighters ever produced, with an 88:1 or 2 kill ratio.
F-35s outclass the F-16 in A2A by orders of magnitude beyond what it will ever be able to accomplish.
The F-35 series also exceed the A2G, Anti-Ship, and other mission set capabilities of the latest F-16s or any other 4th Gen fighters.
@@LRRPFco52 Already to be Omnirole, it would have to fly, then also that it does not k1ll its pilots. In 1 month, another 2" 2 iron 35" were lost, 1 F35B at sea during a landing and an F35 A in South Korea.
The F35 is not really Omnirole and will never squeeze it for several points:
Its rate of climb and its speed, shitty to make interception. Its maneuverability, not terrible for combat.
The main thing and the fact that it only has one turbo fan means that it will never be a good close support aircraft (as proof the URSAF is modernizing its A10s... and does not rely on it at all ) It is also necessary to take the 25mm cannon in the nacelle ... LOL ... in Close supports it is 0 pointed.
The Rafales with its two engines and its great maneuverability, they can do all the close support missions of France. Like just doing a show force passage to calm down the groups of African rebels or the Taliban, and this without fear of a reactor impact or a Man pad...
Same thing at sea level, for aircraft carriers, a single turbo fan is just suicide at sea.
It's the recent speech of uncle sam (we heard the same in all the wars he lost (we are the best) that is to say, all lost since WW2
The F16 has never really measured against fighters of the same standard... It's the same thing for the F15. It's easy to win when you only fight infinitely weaker enemies. The F16s never went into a high intensity fight, but against old Soviet migs, with totally obsolete standards, 6 cowboys against 1 bandit and with AWACS coverage to be sure...
All therefore, against Migs piloted by incompetent and stupid Arabs... Who to go in 1vs 6 without having a fox 3 missile not even sure that they had fox 1...
Therefore :
Believing that his truncate statistics are pertianat is just a joke....
Finally, once in Greece An F16 to shoot with a Greek Mirage
(F16 C against a Mirage 2000 RDM, ) result destruction of the Turkish F16.
The F16 is a good aircraft, but nothing more.
What matters is the doctrine, the standard, the equipment they carry, and the choice of weapons (missiles etc)
Often poor countries have missiles that are outdated and can be fooled, jammed easily. When they don't only have fox 2
An F16 of the latest Block 72 style with an AESA radar, AM120-Ds and a competent pilot
there ok, this is scary... A Turkish F16C, not DSL.
Your F16, against a serious competitor with equivalent avionics and stadart, often does not make the weight, in reality.
It's the same thing for the Russian saucepan (fighter), If opposite there were the latest standard mig 31s with competent Russian pilots, and their latest missile, the ratio would not be the same.
He can't already measure himself against the Mirage 2000 with equal standards, you can't imagine the distortion with the Rafale which is also maneuvering without pushing twice as hard, has an AESA radar, frontal obtronics and Credible Fox 3 missiles (meteor).
As for his generational story, it's just ridiculous
Only the specifications count.
The F35 and the Rafale are almost the same schedule of tasks.
Collaborative network warfare, multi-mission.
The F35 has a hold and better stealth in the frontal sector, a more powerful radar.
The Rafale has better terrain tracking option (super low flight) better missiles, frontal optronics
With a better power weight, a higher rate of climb, an unequaled maneuverability of super cruising.
(greater autonomy and greater carrying capacity)
Better reliability and much easier maintenance
cost per flight hour 2 times cheaper.
Eventually, when all the bugs will be patched, the F35 will probably be a very good plane. Today it is not really combat proven.
Currently the best in this category is the Dassault Rafale F3r, followed by the Boeing F18 E/f and the F35 only far behind these two.
The other Europeans do not know how to make such a sophisticated and multi-mission fighter, the Russians are picking up and the Chinese are 20 years behind the Russians, Russians who are 10 behind us.
The Japanese haven't done anything since World War II.
The Koreans have no experience.
The Indians can't make anything stolen on their own without the help of the French.
Objectively, given the fighters in the world, the choice of the F35 is irrelevant. Having Boeng in his 1st delta wing version was much more believable... The f35 is too expensive and too complex an aircraft to be a good war fighter.
@@RIRI-el6xm Here comes the Rafale fanboy and his rant... 😂
Detection range and actual weapons track ranges are different. Also being able to track a B52 at 250 kilometres is not very convincing but being able to track an F22 at 80k is. The ability to orbit around a target so giving little of your own position is equally useful and a repositioner can do this so is better than a fixed system.
The radar that can operate in low probability of intercept ( low power ) and still remain functional adds to the versitality of the system
as having a good library of return profiles to make comparisons.
The newest CAPTOR can detect targets with a RCS of 1m² on 185 km !
I found @ the end , thanx , thanx , thanx , please tell us about Old Aircraft Radars like Mig-21 , Mig-23, MIG-25 , Su-22 ( Bomber ) , Mig-27 , F-5 , F-117 ?? and others , Thank You alot , alot 🙏🙏
Thanks.
Can you make a top 10 most high altitude supersonic aircraft video comparison?
Uniqe topic and New generation of video
Make a video with most powerful SAM radars
A standard for comparision on m2 has to be made, compare on two point ditection distance for 1 sqr Meter & ditection distance for 3 Sqr m
How about ¿maximun detection irrespective of target?, ¿how far can you go overall, total numbers?
B2 0.1m2 can be ditected from x kms aways
Rafale 2m2 can be detected y kms aways
Mig29 3m2 can be ditected z kms away
Gripen e has raven es-05 captor e. Plus radar is on swash plate. I think you overlooked that one.
what is a swash plate?
@@ethanmac639 A rotating plate giving the Jas 39 E the capability to cover a a more than 240° area. Jas 39 E/F can also be equipped with a GaN radar giving it the same or better range than a F35. It has also if equiped with a GaN radar the most poverfull attack capability.
@@sorennilsson9742 Hard to believe. For starters the F-35’s radar is almost twice the size of Gripen E, having twice the number of T/R modules (1,676 vs. ~830) F35 has 700mm aperture diameter for the antenna array and Raven antenna ray much smaller total aperture diameter, something close to 500mm.
The Captor E has a range of 394 km.
AN/APG-81-1300 km, Byelka - 1500 km
@@Ivan0vsky I couldn't find the range on Northrop Grumman web site. Deagal states the range as 150 km as does Military Analyzer
If F-15EX has the same radar as F-35 can literally fire all of its 20 missiles to the target
I see you did top weapons of Israel recently since it was topical. I dare you to do top weapons of Taiwan.
A nice topic indeed
buenos nohes podrias poner en español yo te sigo pero no entiendo el ingles desde ya muhas graias
#Top_10_Light_Utility_Helicopter plz. Plz... ❤️🇮🇳
Land based radar made video please
I thinking this parts is too secret for open sources of information, such as submarines signaling and networking.
How about tsekwan raidar?
which fighter uses RAYTHEON PhantomStrike Radar ?
new video for uttam radar bro
Kud you plz let me know what rank have auttam a.e.s.a. have in world
The IBRIS E is overhyped, recently Egypt airforce found out the Rafale's radar is superior to Su-35 radar because the airforce has both fighter jets.
Egypt doesn't have su 35 yet.
What about new UTTAM AESA MK2,MK3,MK4 radar of India ? India is changing all Russian and Israeli made radars with UTTAM AESA.
Most range probably byelka. Most advanced radar apg 81 .
Mig 35 radar detection range more than 280 km. Export version is 180 km
On a 8 m² target. Well if it meats a Jas 39 E there will be less than 0.5 m if it is armed with meteor missiles. This means that we talk about a detection range of about 80 km. At that distance the F35 has been detected for more than 80 km by the Jas C GaN radar now ready for production.
And what we see in Ukraine on rus Orcs planes is different 🤔🤔🤣
Just give the F-15EX the same radar F-35 or F-22 uses the F-15 is a tried and proven aircraft also a good force multiplier for USAF.
All new F35 F16 blk70 F15ex Hornet use a scaled radar of an/apg 81
So basically of let's say 10 to 12 F-35s only 1 has to have its radar active and can guide the missiles of all others
Yeah or they can share areas to search. Unless they are being lit by a search radar, enemy fighters will have to try to illuminate them, which means the F35 can stay passive and detect at far greater range. A bit of a cat and mouse game, but depends on the tactics and skills on both sides a lot I suppose?
The Russian, American and French radars are more powerful, but the US has 400 km, the Russian also has 400 km, and the French 200 km
Don't trust russian radar
Because a range alone has no real value. Spotting a A380 or a F/A-18 will give totally different ranges for the same radar.
Basically it's like saying your eyes can see at 2 km, but without saying specifically what you can see, it has no value. I can see the sun much further away, I can't see a fly at that distance either.
Why apg81 is top 1? WRONG!!! apg81 is obviously inferior to apg77
1 . apg77v3 ? (maybe already exists)
2 . apg77v2
3 . apg77v1
4 . apg81
Uttam mk1 and uttam mk2 on the way
Yeah on the way to face a fate like arjun tank desi teja and nirbhray cruise missile 😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😂😂😂
byelka is better
@@Ivan0vsky byelka is
best but uttam mk1 and mk2 deserve place in top 10 list.
@@bijendrakumaryadav165 mk-2 maybe, mk-1 definitely not
👍👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏
Uttam aesa radar
Italia ever the top
Where is Su30 mki ????
Where is uttam aesa mk1, mk2, mk3, Mk4????
In while aircraft it is installed
ELM-2052 radar is missing.
In a top-10 list, if you even allow any PESA Radar into the mix, you have failed. PESA fighter Radars are nowhere near the top-10. Here are the actual top 10:
5th Gen
APG-81(V)1 Latest JSF AESA integrated with AN/ASQ-239, AN/AAQ-37, and EOTS
APG-77(V)1 Upgraded Raptor AESA integrated with AN/ALR-94(V)X
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-
APG-79(V)4 Latest Hornet/Super Hornet AESA which has the new GaN TRM technology where 30% faster electron mobility is found over Silicon SC
CAPTOR-E Mk2 UK AESA for Typhoon with mix of GaN and GaA TRMs, higher TRM count than CAPTOR-E Mk1
APG-63(V)3
APG-82
CAPTOR-E Mk1 Luftwaffe/Spanish Air Force Typhoon upgrade program
CAPTOR-E Mk0 Kuwait Typhoon Radar
APG-79 legacy in Block 2 Super Hornets
RBE2 in the Rafale
APG-83 SABR upgrade program for 350 Later Block CCIP F-16CM in USAF service
APG-63(V)3 and APG-82 both have the largest antenna arrays and were suspected of having the highest TRM counts for a long time, but actual TRM counts are tightly-guarded on them and the APG-77.
With each generational improvement in semi conductor materials science that is actually producible in numbers suitable for prime US DoD contractors, you will see a major capabilities upgrades at that time. For many years since their initial R&D, GaN TRMs promised substantial improvements in performance, but were too expensive to source for the TRM counts on ESAs for large fighter fleets. That cost barrier has been broken in the last 4 years, with the biggest purchasing power in the JSF, ATF upgrade, Super Hornet upgrade, and legacy Hornet upgrade fleets. The next largest customer base I’m aware of is the UK with the CAPTOR-E Mk2 which uses the mix of GaN and GaA TRMs in the Antenna Array, with a higher TRM count than the CAPTOR-E Mk1 and Mk0.
To do this comparison, you would need a graph that represents actual detection and tracking ranges on specific RCS value targets, TRM counts, power amp performance, EW/ECM/ECCM features, cooling and thermal operating performance at peak/mid/low power modes, LPI features, and all of these are classified.
I read your comments on this post, and I can see you are very well read. If possible, can you please provide me with where you read articles or get this knowledge from?
@@Justadreamer29 Over 40 years of being in the Aerospace and Defense industry. My family worked on these types of programs in development and operational test since the 1970s.
@@LRRPFco52 Oh, that's nice. It was extremely informative to read your comments. Can I ask you one question? In a hypothetical future war scenario, how would an F-35 fare against the S-400 or S-500?
@@Justadreamer29 Israeli F-35Is have already been negating Russian AF IADS systems in Syria as a rule for many years now, and overflew the new integrated Air Defense Network Russia helped install in Iran a few years ago.
S-400 is a system of systems, not a single platform. There are layers of missile defense really meant for strategic coverage of Russian airspace for incoming ICBMs, bombers, and cruise missiles.
Tactical fighter systems are meant to be detected by other layers and nomenclature systems with appropriate sensor and weapons employment zones.
The problem for land-based systems in dealing with true VLO platforms like JSF is the curvature of the earth. In order to get the widespread networked sensor coverage from mobile platforms, you need a way to connect with each other that deals with that curvature.
By the time you do satellite or airborne relay platforms, your vulnerabilities are significant. Then factor in decoy missiles, VLO cruise missiles, jammer decoy missiles (where US cruise missile program came from), high ECM environment, anti-satellite weapons that have been in-play since the 1970s, and the Electronic Attack capabilities of JSF, and the force structure is quite overwhelming.
This is why Russia invests in buying-off US politicians, to avoid having to ever go toe-to-toe with US conventional forces. That was true with many White Houses, Senators, Congressmen, DoD officials, CIA Directors, you name it. These efforts date back to at least the FDR WH, so it is quite entrenched. For example, Russia bought most of Joe Biden’s senate campaign through a front group in 1972 to get him in.
Clinton’s have been on Russian payroll since no later than the mid-1980s, as well as on China’s, Pakistan’s, etc. Obama was raised to be a Manchurian candidate. Bush41 was likely in China’s pocket in the 1970s-forward. Evidence is in their financial behavior, which the intelligence agencies know about but can’t report on.
@@LRRPFco52 thank you so much, that was informative
Always, USA number 1 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
Captor radar are also manufactured largely by french compagnies
Only the French know how to create Easa Radar in Europe.
Not true Captor E is made by Leonardo an Italian based company. AESA radars are produced in several European countries like France, Germany, Italy , UK, Sweden and Nederland. They are produced in collaboration as well as singly . Sweden sell radars to the US Navy and to France so that theory of yours is not true.
What Chaptor is number9 zhok is 10?!!😏😏
SAAB AB pioneered GaN radars and assisted the US in the process.
Not even close. GaN TRMs and semiconductors were developed and are manufactured in large enough quantities in the US. There are more GaN TRMs in legacy Hornets now than the Gripen E will ever have, and legacy Hornets are nowhere near the top priority for GaN TRM AESAs.
@@LRRPFco52 Total Nonsense! (S.M.H.)
@@Desire123ification Everything I stated is factually correct.
All the cutting edge semiconductor development and large-scale military orders for latest SC technology are driven by US DoD, with US-bssed SC companies who have tight military-industrial clearance for supplying those parts.
UK, Canada, and Australia have the next-highest priority in that supply chain.
GaN TRMs develooment, manufacturing, quality control, and defect rate reduction was all pioneered in the US using chemical vapor deposition technology.
Defects per cm2 are the big roadblock in GaN SC manufacturing, and what made it prohibitively-expensive for anyone else.
Each AESA antenna array has anywhere from 1500-2000+ TRMs in US AESAs, so when you scale that to hundreds of fighters, you start to see the economy of scale and demand-driven industry response.
A tiny enterprise at Saab with a few dozen orders has almost no pull in that sector, whereas JSF with thousands of orders, F-22A with 120 combat-coded Raptors in an increment upgrade program, over 620 Super Hornets, scores of legacy Hornets getting GaN TRM-equipped APG-79(V)4 right now in USMC and Canada, and the UK's Eurofighter CAPTOR-E Mk2 GaN TRM requirements...will dwarf anything Saab is working on for the next 20 years.
In short, any defense industry SC manufacturers who are cleared will feed the demand from the biggest customers with the largest order volumes.
It makes zero sense for them to service tiny orders to a little program with no real support, low forecast for future orders.
It does make sense to service orders to fleets with thousands of units on-order in various programs of record, as well as to the same companies who are also upgrading large legacy fleets.
@@LRRPFco52 Let me bring the discussion, to your level of comprehension (hopefully by then it would be crystal clear). A substitution of planes with cars for that matter. A Rolls Royce (F 22), Lamborghini (F 35), Ferrari (F 18 E/F), Maserati (F 15), Aston Martin (F 16) and Ford Mustang (Gripen). The cars are subjected to a grueling battery of test. Seriously running the gauntlet: In children pool, mud, dust, woodland, rocks and gravel. In all likelihood, the Mustang has a better chance to come out less damaged and easy to repair, promptly back on the road! You tell me, which is better?
@@Desire123ification My level of comprehension comes from being in aerospace and defense since the 1970s, with most of the aerospace-relevant experience from the Air Force Flight Test Center, West German Flight Test Center's AeroE Course curriculum, USAF Air Planner Course, Joint Forces operational Large Force Exercises, and deployments to PACOM, CENTCOM, and EUCOM.
Multiple members of my family and I have worked on or with mostly USAF developmental fighter and weapons systems programs since the 1970s.
Your car analogy doesn't work, but I see the false premises you were trying to support with it, and refer you back to the Tesla model I mentioned.
A Tesla will crush a Mustang/Ferrari/Lambo/etc. no matter what you do to them. When you actually need to use them, you need roof racks, a police-style spotlight bolted to the L A pillar, a radar detector suction-cupped to the windshield, Jerry cans mounted on a bumper rack, with a towed trailer.
Picture that for all the cars you mentioned. That's 4th Gen.
JSF is more like a Koenigsegg hybrid propulsion system vehicle with Tesla driver display, networked with other Teslas that track the locations of speed traps via an encrypted net that isn't accessible to anyone else because of the physical structures of the data transfer/receive devices and the protocols they use.
The Tesla has a smaller maintenance footprint with prognostic systems management.
Gripen E is like a Honda Civic bred with a 1970s Volvo with a weak muffler job and a tablet radio installed. Struggles to tow the roof racks, let alone the trailer and Jerry cans. Nobody knows what it will take to fix it because only a handful of prototypes have been built, and they still don't have the police spotlight mounted in the A pillar.
A 1970s Chevelle SS 454 with a massive tow trailer hitched to it still crushes the Volvo clean 0-60mph. It's pathetic really.
But you miss the uttam radar of India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 but why
Cause Its not operational
It's still in testing with initial less tr module variant
@@sagardyenchilwar8762 but you didn't tell that sorry for that
@@PraveenPraveen-dt7qr
Sorry I don't get it ?
@@sagardyenchilwar8762 It's not battle tested
Ditch the robotic text synthesizer UNWATCHABLE.
F22 best of all
The fact that any PESA radars (i mean there's even an MSA in this list) are in the top 10 makes this video a joke.
there training Chinese Seagulls to take out f-35s
I think as reading before the reang of captor/E radar is more than the fransh RBE2 & Russian Zuke it can reach around 350 km .
And the radar of su 35 & mig 31 is from passive class not the active class Regardless the range
@British Airways Boeing 747-436 I know that well but I mean the reang of captor E is more than the video speak
New Russian radar Byelka (Su-57) it can reach around 1500 km
@@Ivan0vsky
1500 km !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You sure 🤔?????????????????
@@tammamalsharani2596 Byelka it's not ordinary AESA radar, it's a system 5 radars can operate in majority bands and a lot of sensors on the planer, it's a new advence technology
@@Ivan0vsky
Very well 👏👌🏻
I hope that
No Chinese radars featured on your list ! Something else all Russian aviation sources say that Zaslon M is a stronger radar than Irbis e specially the range of detection!
New Russian radar Byelka ( Su-57) it can reach around 1500 km.
Klj-7a is at least not weaker than apg-83
@@Ivan0vsky That's meaningless information. All those radar can reach around 1500km, or more if the target is big enough.
@@ivanlagrossemoule
you're wrong, you don't take RCS into account, and dimensions don't matter
@@ivanlagrossemoule not at all, AN/APG-81 1300 km. -5 m2 RCS
Hi bot
The Su 57 doesn't use the Irbis E radar, just the Su 35, you were wrong on that point.
(Su 57) It use the AESA radar N036 Byelka, it operates in X Band and has a range of 400 km for fighter jets with radar signature of 3 square meters.
Can track 62 targets and attack 16 and it can track stealth fighters with radar signature of 0.01 square meters at 90-120 km.
But I like the video, good job.
Is Moscow losing a war to a smaller country 😒 so what good is it if they still losing the war
@@Netscape- like the US and the NATO in Vietnam and Afghanistan, ¿Right?.
@@manuel969 The USSR also lost the war in Afghanistan. Forgot ?
@@siroliver9889 do you want to compare the URSS against NATO?
@@manuel969 I want to tell you about the war in Afghanistan. The USSR invaded Afghanistan. Why not mention that too.
I Like rusian fighter jet sukhoi and mig... In the world.
Cornet.
missing israel aesa radar EL/M-2052
It doesn't count.
to bad its on the crazy expensive paper plane that cant hardly fly
Go 200k subs
Another time this pro russian canal
Russian have got best radars
Just remember guys....these are the people that said that the F313 was a actual stealth fighter before deleting the video.
Where's the Byelka? Byelka is top!!!
She included that while mentioning about the IRBIS-E radar.....
@@Carnage388z But she did not really talked about it's range or how many modules it has. That's a shame
@@uday9918 😌😌😌
@@Carnage388z
The Sh-121 consists of the N036 Byelka radar system and L402 Himalayas electronic countermeasures system. Developed by Tikhomirov NIIP Institute, the N036 consists of the main nose-mounted N036-1-01 X band active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, or active phased array radar (Russian: Активная фазированная антенная решётка, Aktivnaya Fazirovannaya Antennaya Reshotka, Russian: АФАР, AFAR) in Russian nomenclature, with 1,552 T/R modules and two side-looking N036B-1-01 X-band AESA radars with 358 T/R modules embedded in the cheeks of the forward fuselage for increased angular coverage.Moreover, the side-looking radar could enable the Su-57 to employ extreme beaming tactic (fighter turns 90 degrees away / perpendicular to an enemy's pulse doppler radar array, so that the enemy's radar would not detect / misinterpret it as a non-moving object) while still able to guide its own missile.The suite also has two N036L-1-01 L band transceivers on the wing's leading edge extensions that are not only used to handle the N036Sh Pokosnik (Reaper) friend-or-foe identification system
@@Ivan0vsky bro but its a GaAs radar
Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!
Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity
Unless they are in our team, of curse.
@@user-gh2oz3nq9v It's a whole load more effective than explaining to the other side that they should be peaceful.
No Radar of Chindi Padosi 😳 .... which can track n guide worlds only extra terrestrial PL15 missile that can shot down .0001mtsq target from earth to Mars 😫😜🤣
Why India's Uttam aesa radar of Indian Air Force isn't included?
Es vedio ki highest dislike pe pahuchao
Kyu se ki esne uttam radar ko nhi include keya
I dislike vedio but very informative
Chutiya
我挺喜欢看这个频道的，印度人自娱自乐的日常，哈哈。
哈哈，光辉都有一票死忠粉，怕不怕
RAVEN ES-05 it's the best radar all
Not even close. It is out-classed by about every Western AESA Radar in most relevant metrics.
India's UTTAM AESA radar will dominate the future....
yeeeaaahhh jai hind🇮🇳💪💪💪👍👍👍
American radar will continue to dominate for generations. India, like all nations, is playing catch-up to America in radar technology. By the time you do catch-up to our current capabilities. We'll have already released newer radar tech that surpasses it.
@@fullcircle8231 pride has a fall.... Remember this.....
@@fullcircle8231 There is a lot of negativity regarding indians in the world.... No matter what india achieve in different fields,the only thing that people judge and mock is the negative part of it....I am not mentioning all foreigners,there are many many people who support us but there are also a selected category of people like you who have a very narrow or absolutely no thinking capabilities.....So nothing to say about those trash talkers .... And huh.... Keep doing that..... Let's meet after a decade or so.... Then you will come to know where are we standing....
@ pal seems like a burst.. hmmm never mind we still get the engine from ge for Tejas, injection seat, retractable probe from uk.. so you please mind the way you think... don't think u and me can make India a super power.. we have to save our skin in all situations.. we don't need an alpha behaviour in an under dog situation.. 🙏
Hi sister .......like pls 😉
Russian IRBIS scanning sector +/- 120⁰,
APG-81 only +/- 60⁰
Guess who find target faster 😂
if you can find target its a good system
Mechanical steering is not the same as electronic steering. Plus the APG/AN-81 gets the extra benefit of being AESA.
I worked with a number of Russian engineers and I am always impressed. There is no reason to doubt that Russian radars are top class. But in all of the recent regional wars, the Russian SAM systems have not done so well. The limited air to air conflict over Iraq was also very one sided. I think that the radar investment in Europe and USA is likely to be the edge in performance.
The American one.
I’d take AESA over PESA radar any day.
Lol 😂
Haa haa no china ans pak in list
Who decides these lists ?
Russian radars are inferior to USA radars 😅
It’s a fact
These lists hierarchy is ridiculous
🇮🇳
J 20 China fighter plane radar name please tell me
Klj 5 nearly 2000 transmit modules but it cannot use it's full potential because of it's underpowered engines
irbis no1
Russian pesa radders doesn't deser6to be in this list
Notice chinese copy cat of the Russian Aesa Radar sucks so bad it didn’t make the list...
Useless things
Zaslon and Irbis are best radars in the world....
But Byelka is better