Yeah, that was a great line. Obviously a twist on the Theodore Roosevelt quote. Funnily enough, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is nicknamed "The Big Stick". Very appropriate. ;o)
As a submariner I have always wondered how long does it take to do a combat reload on both CIWS systems. Seems like with the influx of drones like the Iranian drones being used in Ukraine. It seems the small boats Iran uses could each deploy with 2 dozen or more on board. So a combat reload would be desired.
15-30 mins usually at least for the phalanx, depends on how well trained the gun crew are at reloading it, and I also believe older Model cwis's take closer to 30mins. One of my old HS friends is actually onboard one of the Ticonderoga class cruisers and that's his job, or at least one of them
Sadly, all vertical launch missile reloads can't be done at all at sea. Destroyer has to rotate out with another destroyer just to return to base for reloading missile box modules. Only the CWIS RAMs and 5 inch gun can be reloaded at sea
air combat is the same. its like two soldiers throwing spears at each other from long distances, then running into cover to dodge the spear coming at them
Near peer ? more like Russia are 20 years ahead. any direct conflict entire american battle fleets sunk by modern anti ship hypersonics that cant be shot down with no analogue. heh theyve only got 15 revisions of their nuclear triad whilst yours are still using floppy disks from the 70s. a real shooting war. most if not all US / western fleets would be the first things to sink.
I don’t agree with that. Just cause someone has missiles onboard, even long range sea-skimming missiles, there is so much more then that that goes into establishing a solution to fire I don’t think any country on earth right now is approaching near pier status with the U.S. Navy.
To the officers and sailors of the USS Carney thank you so much for all you do. Prayers that all your efforts are successful and that every one of you return home safely. G-d Bless.
The Arleigh Burke class destroyer is a great ship. I'm glad we're building more. I'm confident the new constellation class frigate will be a great addition to our Navy too.
@@Brunel1859 Yah cut the military budget back...(900 hundred billion dollars a year can buy a lot of groceries..Stop running all over the place like we run the place...Close down the 800 military bases around the world..A lot of the people at those small bases are just bait for the other side..When the missiles start flying,they're dead..A lot of the comments here are from 30 years ago..Not relevant for today..Missile tech has come a long way..this country needs to get off a war footing..It's worse now than 53 years ago in Vietnam..What made that worse is I got drafted and did what they said..Hopefully young people are smart enough not to participate in any type of conscription program the US government would come up with nowadays...
I was on the USS Lake Champlain CG-57, that was in the 90s, it was awesome then, I can only imagine what other weapon systems the world doesn’t know about. Not that it needs anything else.
there isnt much anything break through that what is mostly seen. its boils down to how effective dose it work. a lot of these system doesnt come out perfect. over the years it improved and being better. now they can safely say it works. even if it works good, you dont want to tell your foe how well it works. you want them to guess. U.S will show force when need to. sometime they downplay it to let the foe think its not as good as it seem to test how much they push it. they used sm-2 to shoot down a drone. think about it.. thats like throwing million dollar away to take down a paper airplane. thats a show of force. also its israel. U.S keep a close tie with israel for geographic strategies. giving if it were other countries, U.S would probably track it without shooting it down. donald trump show an image from satellite when they scout a target. the image was very clear. you can see wheels on a car or door of a cabinet. being president he show classified image that show the cutting edge technology to the world. thats nothing new they had that tech prob early 80's. the EU used ground base radar to track a satellite with very clear image of an object. you can actually see the satellite spinning in space. dont expect UFO technologies or robot as a secret tech. it really goes down to how well it works. as you can see russia system although very good - still not as good as you think it is.
*Well maybe U.S. ships shouldn't be stalking around in the middle east then.* All nations have the right to defend themselves against occupying forces. If the U.S. doesn't wanna get defended against, then stop occupying other peoples' countries and waters. DUH.
@@worldadventuretravelthey have been protecting shipping in the Red Sea. Most of those missiles and drones were shot at multinational ships. One of the Houthi’s goals is to shut down those routes. If you shut down commerce in the Red Sea then you shut down the world. These things aren’t always so simple. Almost every middle eastern country wants those waters to be protected.
Amazing all right..Even though there is no defense for a hypersonic missile running hot straight and normal,coming down the pike at Mach 8, to send one of our great big beer cans (aircraft carrier) to the bottom of the sea..
@@bigstuff52 Yes there is lol. Raytheon has been producing interceptors for these types of threats for years now. Plus laser systems have evolved to the point they can start being deployed on Burke class destroyers to easily intercept hypersonic missiles targeting a fleet. Also what a lot of people seem to fail to realize is that naval warfare is more complicated than they think. It's a lot more than just "lol just shoot a fast missile at them lol" and win like Chinese propagandist would have you believe. The United States has invested tens of millions into anti-satellite technology for this reason. You cannot kill a carrier if you don't know where it is, and you certainly can't maintain a course and lock without that kill chain. The United States is the global leader in satellite warfare by a landslide. As long as they maintain that astronomical advantage, hypersonic missiles are next to useless against carrier strike groups.
That was a great introduction to the destroyer and it’s weapons and roles. Very well presented and understandable (this from a former Naval Intelligence Officer)…i.e. good brief. Thank you.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g thank you so much for your blessing. It means a great deal to me. Understanding across cultural lines is one of the greatest goals we can achieve.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g You mean submitting-and-groveling to the neo-Canaanite, neo-Ba'al voodoo Moon God, His plagiarist Cartoon Character and Paper-and-Ink Idols?
People also ask Does the US give aid to Iran? Iran has thus far received approximately $46 million in military aid from the U.S., and an additional $58 million is currently programmed.
Reminds me of when I was on a DDG back in the 1990’s when AEGIS first came out. Firecontrol radars are fun to work on and operate. SPY-1 was like Star Wars level tech back then.
*Well maybe U.S. ships shouldn't be stalking around in the middle east then.* All nations have the right to defend themselves against occupying forces. If the U.S. doesn't wanna get defended against, then stop occupying other peoples' countries and waters. DUH.
We didn't have them in Korea. Intercepts were manual using hand held circular "slip stick" calculators to backup fire control electro-mechanical computers. But... airplanes were slower and the rockets of the day were strictly Mickey Mouse ( pure ballistic). We retired scope dopes were happy to see Aegis arrive.
@@mohammadsufyan7730 *Laughs in Afghanistan, and the very long list of counties that have successfully fought off the US* These ships are sitting ducks out there, especially the ones stupid enough to park in the very tight Persian gulf. Then a simple Miltia has a good chance of sinking your Carrier while outside the range of it's aircraft you know they are rendered completely obsolete.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g Ethan. ? That's a traditional American name for sure. How did you get into mysticism ? Be careful that's weird voodoo you are handling. Scares people too. Thanks for the invite but I have to decline.
we all hope it saved lives for sure. on a distant secondary note: Its interesting what the cost of that missile is vs. what that drone cost. Either way, its a good to see we have this capability and further strengthens why the navy is so important across the globe.
My concern is inventory. The destroyers can only carry so many missiles at a time. They are also consumable and expensive. There are a lot of parties in the neighborhood that have stockpiles of weapons to overwhelm.
@jimfrazier8611 Phalanx is a modular "bolt-on" system that is self contained. As such, there are limitations to amount of ammunition that it can carry. That said, in engaging an incoming missile, Phalanx may only have a few seconds to shoot it. Therefore 15 seconds of ammunition means it has enough to engage several missiles before its magazine is depleted.
@jimfrazier8611 I take your point. I don't pretend to have any special knowledge about the Phalanx or the Kinzhal. I'm just going through the publicly available information. The latest Phalanx model is Block 1B andq has a 4,500 rounds/minute rate and a magazine drum of 1,550 rounds. That equals 20.67 seconds of firing time. The maximum range is 5,500 meters. A hypersonic missile travels at a minimum of Mach 5. That equates to 1,715 meters/second. If a Phalanx begins fire at maximum range and continues all the way back to the ship, it has 3.2 seconds against a Mach 5 missile. At that rate, a Phalanx can engage 6.45 times before running dry. The question for which there is no public answer is: how many hypersonics does it take to swamp a carrier strike group's electronic warfare, multiple Aegis systems shooting 100s of SM-2s, 3s, 6s, and ESSMs to get 7-8 missiles into Phalanx range?
@@Rob_F8F interesting think through. I wouldn't dispute your logic or math, but the the ciws was never designed to engage hypersonic targets. They are best used against slower moving targets, such as mortar, artillery and rockets (as in land warfare). And missiles too, but a supersonic missile would be the limit of its capabilities. Hypersonic projectiles are a relatively new paradigm of warfare, and are going to require a whole new paradigm of defensive strategies. Currently, many people consider it an impossible task to intercept and destroy a hypersonic missile once in flight. Thinking about the sinking of the Moskva missile destroyer in the black sea, I believe that it's defences were overwhelmed by a large number of small (and presumably slow moving) drones, before it was hit by two Ukrainian made Neptune anti ship missiles, which I would assume were travelling at supersonic speed. It seemed to be a very cost effective way of doing things, to sink a ship that the Russians considered invincible. It too had a multi layered system of defences, making it supposedly immune from any and all attacks. Incidentally, in your first comment you questioned the idea of the region of the Red Sea being full of 'bad neighbours', but I would say that's true. The region is full of well armed and funded (by Iran) militant groups, who have a surprisingly capable arsenal of weapons and technologies, such as surveillance/reconnaissance drones and guided missiles. That's all you need to have a go at a ship. There are militant groups in the sinai adjacent to the red Sea, in parts of Egypt that the government does not control. These groups also present a threat to Israel, a country that the US is currently trying to defend, so I think it's perfectly reasonable to state that us navy ships are going to be a target for these groups.
I love WSJ analysis but whoever was in charge of the audio of this video should be reprimanded or fired. The volume is so low that I have to max out my PC volume just to barely hear the narrator. Otherwise, great content
Wow being on a 1950s to 70s gearing class destroyer is very humbling to see the really cool stuff now. We had ASROC systems, mark 4 torpedoes, and 5 inch 38s, although rumor had it that some of the shells were LAZER guided! Woo hoo!
A carrier group generally consists of around 30 ships. The Carrier. Various war ships. Supply ships. Recovery ships. A hospital ship. A submarine or two.
Definitely not 30. A single carrier group is usually 1 carrier, 3-6 warships, 1-2 submarines and 1-2 supply ships. In a large show of force deployment with allied vessels it might be say 15 vessels total.
@@kevinjenner9502 Who says YOU have the right to force other countries to trade (or anything else) that they do not want to do? Not in the U.S. Constitution.
@@davidb2206 China is using Hydropolitics to force South Asia and India into its political sphere. They build dams on rivers that feed into their countries. You do know that China is doing an even more aggressive GD in South East Asia claiming practically everything with their extended 10-dash line, then 11, then 12, etc. Different tactics, same geopolitics. The Right of Self-determination is also at play. Also, the US wasn't the only one interested in Japan. UK, France, and Russia were in on it to, so Japan just didn't want to fight too many enemies at once and opened up.
These ships and their systems are different level. As an average man in the street with no actual military experience just an interest in weapons and how they have developed over the years..... I find a carrier group such as what America has sent to aid Israel is such a powerfull and intimidating force.
@@Pgr-pt5ep I love how everything is Iranian-backed but they never mentioned American-backed when talked about Al-Qaeda/ISIS in Syria and Lybia or the terrorist groups in Kosovo. Or how about Saudi-backed wahhabists? How about Qatar-backed Hamas leaders? Hahahaha, what a joke. Also, the fact that the ME region is FAR from the US borders - why wouldn't the regional militant forces be backed by Iran? Does the US own the Middle East? What a joke.
The fundamental problem with defending against missiles .Missiles are unmanned and relatively cheap , while destroyers are very costly and full of people. Fire a barrage of of missiles, and eventually one will likely get through, with severe consequences. The US Navy needs to seriously ramp up its unmanned systems projects. A destroyer accompanied by a herd of powerful unmanned craft would totally change the calculus.
High powered lasers, They are already being deployed. Pennies per round. The nuke powered boats easily power the systems, but no weapon is perfect, hence layering as stated.
well yeah SM-2 came out in the 1980s or so, they have SM-6 but will only fire them at high priority targets, they also have SM-3 for shooting down ballistic missiles and ESSM for shooting down anything that makes it past SM-2/6 but they dont have anything crazy, highly doubt they are keeping too much from us as we couldn't do anything with the information, they are however currently making ship launched versions of missiles that have recently gone into service with the USAF and navy planes which are very good missiles, also pretty sure the US have just started development on a hypersonic missile
we know allah. allah been around long time. when i was a kid, a stranger to our neighborhood was nicknamed allahmana booches. but he was not from allah bama, maybe it was allahn town , not sure..alla we knows is alllah aint no god. most likely southern at best.. as when we call the team together "allah yall gather round". but we didn't think it was cus of god,, just the coach.. sorry , not sure the point of your lil poem there..tutu.. but allah us cant play that. @user-tn8uu2cu8g
how, what is anyone going to do with it? it gives no one any benefit knowing this, what would benefit them is the specs of all this, really the only specs they gave was the ranges of the radar and missile, the missile is old tech and i doubt the range stated for the radar is the actual range
@@gibbo_303 We (the US) probably have hundreds of people assigned to decoding Chinese military weapons and hardware. We (the US) literally have a section of the Airforce called China Aerospace Studies Institute. _The China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) is a United States Department of the Air Force think tank which examines all facets of the People's Republic of China and Chinese Communist Party's efforts to project power in the air and space domains. Part of Air University, it provides support to the Air Force, the Space Force, the joint services, civilian federal agencies, and academic research institutions._ Fun Fact: This branch released the unclassified version of the China Rocket Force last year. It created a big problem for Xi since much of the intel was likely gathered by the CIA via a turned Chinese spy / agent. And, it's responsible for some of the missing officers in China's military.
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
I'm a retired Navy Senior Chief. I served on 2 different guided missile cruisers. Any of our Cruisers that have Aegis and the VLS can defeat the entirety of the Iranian Navy by themselves. That's a fact.
Yeah okay. Like they’re just gonna sit there with their hands folded. I’m american, but it amazes me how delusional and egotistical we are. The world Doesn’t revolve around us and we aren’t invincible.
I think surface ships will need their own horde of drones in the future. Maybe different sizes and types can be packed into launchable modules in VLS tubes. They would be used to further confound the terminal guidance systems of anti-ship missiles beyond the Burkes' and Ticonderogas' current EW and other capabilities. In a peer fight the incoming warheads could be nuclear. It will be critical to have a way to confound those guidance systems, because, as you know, all the missile needs to do is get close.
It also has the 4xpack per tube Sea Sparrow at about half the range of the SM-2. Using SM-2s to shoot down cheap Chinese drones is overkill by a lot. We will bankrupt ourselves at that rate without ever going to war.
My son is currently aboard a DDG that is probably somewhere in the middle east. We don't ask and he can't say where. It's a relief to his mother and I knowing how capable the ship is to defend itself. It helps this old Marine to sleep at night!
My Son is out there also. I got a call from him a few weeks ago. It was so nice to hear his voice! Sending love and prayers to those serving during the holidays. ❤
Thank you. I went to the comments looking for _somebody_ to point that out. I'm no expert, but I know that the US doesn't use ramps. And the 2 towers also stood out. I know it's a short list, but I had to go looking for who does to identify it. How lazy of the video producers to use stock footage of another country's navy in a video talking about the _American_ navy.
SM-3 is for anti-ballistic only, they are also using newer blocks of the SM-2 and why waste SM-6 on something that can be shot by SM-2s that will need decommissioning soon anyway
One thing that Aegis can do that wasn't mentioned is that it could take control of weapons on other ships... Let's say there's 6 US Destroyers with one in the middle of a 5 pointed star formation, they can set the one in the middle to be the command and control ship and that ship would consolidate all of the radar data from all 6 ships and launch weapons from all 6 ships to engage multiple threats at the same time using whatever asset is closest with the highest probability of intercept... Aegis is the closest thing we've got to Skynet...
The question should be why is a US submarine doing in the middle East?? When is us gonna leave the middle east alone? It's been 20 years of us milking oil in the middle east. How many more innocent people and soldiers have to die?
Irony: You are US Sailor in the Persian Gulf. The Iranians have infiltrated YOUR own neighborhood back home, without your knowledge, by your own deceitful politicians. Now they know where your kid goes to school, smart guy.
I personally think that crew on this ship was well trained. Also, lucky that the systems were all working the problem with the systems when you start overwhelming /system meaning that an attacked with over whelming target /good chance of hitting the target. And you can see this in the defense for Israel not all the missiles are knocked down.
Any country attacking ships on high seas and sea lanes should be considered as an act of war and UNSC should act on fast track action as it could be further deflowering its status as Security Counsel.
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks! US depends on international trade and influence for its prosperity.
you can fool some of the people some of the time.... why don't Americans have a living wage, health care system for it Citizens, free education, or Bullet trains from coast to coast ?
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
Wow you got everything right, and I am shocked the DOD has not taken this video down, you gave out a lot of sensitive information in this video. More than I would have expected the DOD would allow. lol
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
Adversaries, like the US, perform SIGINT missions to examine US systems. They know almost whatever the US Navy lets them see in operation. They just can't afford it in the volume we can, and they're usually behind us in the details. An AEGIS processor can have "gears" of speed and resolution that they have never seen before because the Navy never shifts into them where they might be examined. Cards to play. Secret sauce ready to go.
Oh, because naturally, invading someone's home, robbing it, and leaving chaos behind is just a delightful pastime, right? And when the homeowner has the audacity to fight back, you get all offended and decide to bring in your mafia buddies to help you out. Because, clearly, in your twisted world, criminal entitlement deserves a standing ovation for sheer idiocy and disregard for others
Either it's democracy or tyranny! After ww2, there no question. Diplomacy only works when one carries the biggest stick. It's about time we deployed the stick. It's already on.
@icemanzw will some fantasy country exist then?? Most of Russia's black sra fleet was put on the bottom of the ocean by a country with no navy. I'm supposed to believe China is any better?
Is it rational for the U.S. and various media to inform the entire planet about American offensive and defensive capabilities? Even IF other major adversaries have some idea of our military capabilities, isn’t it “aiding and abetting” or even treasonous to make military capabilities widely known to anyone who could use that information to plan and develop counter technologies? Or is military and civilian leadership of the U.S. just a cadre of juveniles wearing uniforms or civilians so stupid as to make things easier for adversaries for some other unfathomable rationale?
yep its called propaganda, also many people are just generally curious, tbh i would probably even watch a chinese version of this boasting about their destroyers
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
Don't worry. The Russians and Chinese know a lot more about these subjects than the American public. However, as we see in Ukraine, they haven't necessarily figured out how to make and use these things as well as the highly paid US MIC. I didn't hear anything that was a serious revelation. USAF vet, Avionic Sensor Systems, Electrical Engineer, PE.
@@lonpfrb I can appreciate the thinking behind what you describe. However, I still think it's better to keep potential enemies in the dark about military capabilities. Keeping them guessing and in doubt about capabilities I believe is just as good of a deterrent and keeps potential enemies in the dark about our capabilities. It's better for defense purposes to keep others guessing. But these videos given them detailed information about what we're doing or even ideas we have that others may never have thought of. So I still think is a stupid mistake. Look at the Manhattan Project, did they advertise what the US was doing? All the US has to do is inform potential enemies the US has the capability to counter anything they may come up with without giving them any details. I think American leaders are naive and stupid.
idk maybe u should look at what china has been doing before commenting on the US as they are actually aggressing, the US is just defending itself, its allies and civilians
Id like to know how they know what is a threat and what is a UAP? Spy-1 radar tracks "fleets" of UAPs just hanging out a few dozen miles away so we dispatch f18SH's and we get those videos released, when they (jets) get there ,.the arleigh burke radar shows them maneuvering in ways that cant be explained, how do we differentiate these things from threats? We can dispatch a jet for every UAP as there are too many of them
There’s actually a lot of factors that go into it. It’s not just the system itself making the decisions it self there are operators that sit at consoles that decipher what’s real and what’s not…. To get some what if a concept refer to the movie battleship.
"Speak softly & send a big ship" - Great quote
Yeah, that was a great line. Obviously a twist on the Theodore Roosevelt quote.
Funnily enough, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is nicknamed "The Big Stick". Very appropriate. ;o)
As a submariner I have always wondered how long does it take to do a combat reload on both CIWS systems.
Seems like with the influx of drones like the Iranian drones being used in Ukraine. It seems the small boats Iran uses could each deploy with 2 dozen or more on board. So a combat reload would be desired.
😊
15-30 mins usually at least for the phalanx, depends on how well trained the gun crew are at reloading it, and I also believe older Model cwis's take closer to 30mins. One of my old HS friends is actually onboard one of the Ticonderoga class cruisers and that's his job, or at least one of them
Sadly, all vertical launch missile reloads can't be done at all at sea. Destroyer has to rotate out with another destroyer just to return to base for reloading missile box modules. Only the CWIS RAMs and 5 inch gun can be reloaded at sea
Good question but with multiple destroyers protecting a carrier very hard for shahheds to get through. Pretty sure they’ll put men on the .50 as well.
20mm CIWS reloads take around 5 minutes. You can find videos of it being done here on RUclips.
Anyone who hasn't paid attention to naval things in recent years might be surprised how much near peer war is missile vs missile stuff
air combat is the same. its like two soldiers throwing spears at each other from long distances, then running into cover to dodge the spear coming at them
That’s really not true. These aren’t near peers. Iran and the Houthis don’t have a capable Air Force and navy for force projection.
Near peer ? more like Russia are 20 years ahead. any direct conflict entire american battle fleets sunk by modern anti ship hypersonics that cant be shot down with no analogue. heh theyve only got 15 revisions of their nuclear triad whilst yours are still using floppy disks from the 70s. a real shooting war. most if not all US / western fleets would be the first things to sink.
... dont forget defense scanner radar systems 😊
I don’t agree with that. Just cause someone has missiles onboard, even long range sea-skimming missiles, there is so much more then that that goes into establishing a solution to fire I don’t think any country on earth right now is approaching near pier status with the U.S. Navy.
To the officers and sailors of the USS Carney thank you so much for all you do.
Prayers that all your efforts are successful and that every one of you return home safely.
G-d Bless.
Thank you! I'm a mom of a deployed sailor. It is amazing how many comments are negative. ❤
Combat System is Awesome ' Good Job to the Crew of USS CARNEY 🎉
This is a great series. Keep em coming.
The Arleigh Burke class destroyer is a great ship. I'm glad we're building more. I'm confident the new constellation class frigate will be a great addition to our Navy too.
@@Brunel1859 wasn't the Zumwalt cancelled?
it is sinking
Remember the Lusitania!
@@Brunel1859 Who would have thought there would be massive cost overruns..In America? Couldn't happen....
@@Brunel1859 Yah cut the military budget back...(900 hundred billion dollars a year can buy a lot of groceries..Stop running all over the place like we run the place...Close down the 800 military bases around the world..A lot of the people at those small bases are just bait for the other side..When the missiles start flying,they're dead..A lot of the comments here are from 30 years ago..Not relevant for today..Missile tech has come a long way..this country needs to get off a war footing..It's worse now than 53 years ago in Vietnam..What made that worse is I got drafted and did what they said..Hopefully young people are smart enough not to participate in any type of conscription program the US government would come up with nowadays...
Reminds me of the unrecognized courage of the crew of the USS Liberty
I was on the USS Lake Champlain CG-57, that was in the 90s, it was awesome then, I can only imagine what other weapon systems the world doesn’t know about. Not that it needs anything else.
gotta keep em busy ... progress and improvement 😊
there isnt much anything break through that what is mostly seen. its boils down to how effective dose it work. a lot of these system doesnt come out perfect. over the years it improved and being better. now they can safely say it works. even if it works good, you dont want to tell your foe how well it works. you want them to guess. U.S will show force when need to. sometime they downplay it to let the foe think its not as good as it seem to test how much they push it.
they used sm-2 to shoot down a drone. think about it.. thats like throwing million dollar away to take down a paper airplane. thats a show of force. also its israel. U.S keep a close tie with israel for geographic strategies. giving if it were other countries, U.S would probably track it without shooting it down.
donald trump show an image from satellite when they scout a target. the image was very clear. you can see wheels on a car or door of a cabinet. being president he show classified image that show the cutting edge technology to the world. thats nothing new they had that tech prob early 80's. the EU used ground base radar to track a satellite with very clear image of an object. you can actually see the satellite spinning in space. dont expect UFO technologies or robot as a secret tech. it really goes down to how well it works. as you can see russia system although very good - still not as good as you think it is.
👍
*Well maybe U.S. ships shouldn't be stalking around in the middle east then.* All nations have the right to defend themselves against occupying forces. If the U.S. doesn't wanna get defended against, then stop occupying other peoples' countries and waters. DUH.
@@worldadventuretravelthey have been protecting shipping in the Red Sea. Most of those missiles and drones were shot at multinational ships. One of the Houthi’s goals is to shut down those routes. If you shut down commerce in the Red Sea then you shut down the world. These things aren’t always so simple. Almost every middle eastern country wants those waters to be protected.
I worked on the Aegis, Phalanx (CIWS), VLS and Sea Ram defense systems. Amazing systems.
Amazing all right..Even though there is no defense for a hypersonic missile running hot straight and normal,coming down the pike at Mach 8, to send one of our great big beer cans (aircraft carrier) to the bottom of the sea..
Certified youtube expurt we have here@@bigstuff52
@@bigstuff52 oh yea? and you think they have that technology?
@@bigstuff52 Yes there is lol. Raytheon has been producing interceptors for these types of threats for years now. Plus laser systems have evolved to the point they can start being deployed on Burke class destroyers to easily intercept hypersonic missiles targeting a fleet. Also what a lot of people seem to fail to realize is that naval warfare is more complicated than they think. It's a lot more than just "lol just shoot a fast missile at them lol" and win like Chinese propagandist would have you believe. The United States has invested tens of millions into anti-satellite technology for this reason. You cannot kill a carrier if you don't know where it is, and you certainly can't maintain a course and lock without that kill chain. The United States is the global leader in satellite warfare by a landslide. As long as they maintain that astronomical advantage, hypersonic missiles are next to useless against carrier strike groups.
@@Horible4 ok.......
That was a great introduction to the destroyer and it’s weapons and roles. Very well presented and understandable (this from a former Naval Intelligence Officer)…i.e. good brief. Thank you.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g thank you so much for your blessing. It means a great deal to me. Understanding across cultural lines is one of the greatest goals we can achieve.
Although his numbers for capability's were way understated, I otherwise agree. Former OS2
@user-tn8uu2cu8g Assalamualaikum & Good day 🙏🏽 I've got a question: Doesn't Allah mean God?
@user-tn8uu2cu8g You mean submitting-and-groveling to the neo-Canaanite, neo-Ba'al voodoo Moon God, His plagiarist Cartoon Character and Paper-and-Ink Idols?
People also ask
Does the US give aid to Iran?
Iran has thus far received approximately $46 million in military aid from the U.S., and an additional $58 million is currently programmed.
How do US NAVY SHIPS function...from experience I can tell you unequivocally that they function in in a military fashion.
indeed 🤔 yes
They are generally involved in collisions with commercial vessels.
@@kevinjenner9502 only when the commercial ships are in the south China sea and navigated as well as crewed by the chineese communists.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g that's real kind of you but I have a judeo- Christian background and no intention of changing it.
Love the Burke, good work on the sailor's part for the intercepts
Reminds me of when I was on a DDG back in the 1990’s when AEGIS first came out. Firecontrol radars are fun to work on and operate. SPY-1 was like Star Wars level tech back then.
Free America from Apartheid
@@Huuukvv😂ccp?
Let's put Crooked Donnie in prison SOON
*Well maybe U.S. ships shouldn't be stalking around in the middle east then.* All nations have the right to defend themselves against occupying forces. If the U.S. doesn't wanna get defended against, then stop occupying other peoples' countries and waters. DUH.
We didn't have them in Korea. Intercepts were manual using hand held circular "slip stick" calculators to backup fire control electro-mechanical computers. But... airplanes were slower and the rockets of the day were strictly Mickey Mouse ( pure ballistic). We retired scope dopes were happy to see Aegis arrive.
"Many countries are capable of striking a U.S. aircraft carrier, but not one country is capable of surviving the response" -- John Bolton
Вы льстите себе.
Есть страна которая может на 💯 % уничтожить США и это Россия! Не забывайте об этом.
But we are using 2 million dollar misses to shoot down $10,000 drones...that can't last forever
When Biden is in office he will let whoever attack it
😂
@@mohammadsufyan7730 *Laughs in Afghanistan, and the very long list of counties that have successfully fought off the US*
These ships are sitting ducks out there, especially the ones stupid enough to park in the very tight Persian gulf. Then a simple Miltia has a good chance of sinking your Carrier while outside the range of it's aircraft you know they are rendered completely obsolete.
Track a golf ball 102 miles away! Thats impressive.
A lot of our local golfers are looking for a system like that
@@causewaykayak Haha... I bet they are!
@user-tn8uu2cu8g Ethan. ? That's a traditional American name for sure. How did you get into mysticism ? Be careful that's weird voodoo you are handling. Scares people too. Thanks for the invite but I have to decline.
That's nothing - the James-Webb telescope can read the words "Made in China" printed on that golf ball, from several quadrillion miles away.
@@bq1000bq Yeah but, they made it easy to find, it was in a recycling bin!
Iran has the right to defend itself
Yes it does. But it gets into a sort of gray zone of stealing/reparation seizure confusion at sea.
God bless America 🇺🇸
very nice video! very informative and clear!
Great work, Hero Sailors! Prayers for your continued protection 🙏
IRAN💪
As an old Sailor I really enjoyed this video and learned so much and was glad to subscribe so as to learn more of the same~!!!!
Why are you rehashing the basic functions of Arleigh Burke destroyers as if they were something new? They have been around for decades.
Everything interesting. However bad. Unless used no fear of any weapons.
we all hope it saved lives for sure. on a distant secondary note: Its interesting what the cost of that missile is vs. what that drone cost. Either way, its a good to see we have this capability and further strengthens why the navy is so important across the globe.
My concern is inventory. The destroyers can only carry so many missiles at a time. They are also consumable and expensive. There are a lot of parties in the neighborhood that have stockpiles of weapons to overwhelm.
Who are these neighbors in the Red Sea that have and want to lob missiles at a US destroyer?
Seriously.
@jimfrazier8611 Phalanx is a modular "bolt-on" system that is self contained. As such, there are limitations to amount of ammunition that it can carry.
That said, in engaging an incoming missile, Phalanx may only have a few seconds to shoot it. Therefore 15 seconds of ammunition means it has enough to engage several missiles before its magazine is depleted.
@jimfrazier8611 I take your point. I don't pretend to have any special knowledge about the Phalanx or the Kinzhal. I'm just going through the publicly available information.
The latest Phalanx model is Block 1B andq has a 4,500 rounds/minute rate and a magazine drum of 1,550 rounds. That equals 20.67 seconds of firing time. The maximum range is 5,500 meters.
A hypersonic missile travels at a minimum of Mach 5. That equates to 1,715 meters/second.
If a Phalanx begins fire at maximum range and continues all the way back to the ship, it has 3.2 seconds against a Mach 5 missile.
At that rate, a Phalanx can engage 6.45 times before running dry.
The question for which there is no public answer is: how many hypersonics does it take to swamp a carrier strike group's electronic warfare, multiple Aegis systems shooting 100s of SM-2s, 3s, 6s, and ESSMs to get 7-8 missiles into Phalanx range?
@@Rob_F8F interesting think through. I wouldn't dispute your logic or math, but the the ciws was never designed to engage hypersonic targets. They are best used against slower moving targets, such as mortar, artillery and rockets (as in land warfare). And missiles too, but a supersonic missile would be the limit of its capabilities. Hypersonic projectiles are a relatively new paradigm of warfare, and are going to require a whole new paradigm of defensive strategies. Currently, many people consider it an impossible task to intercept and destroy a hypersonic missile once in flight.
Thinking about the sinking of the Moskva missile destroyer in the black sea, I believe that it's defences were overwhelmed by a large number of small (and presumably slow moving) drones, before it was hit by two Ukrainian made Neptune anti ship missiles, which I would assume were travelling at supersonic speed. It seemed to be a very cost effective way of doing things, to sink a ship that the Russians considered invincible. It too had a multi layered system of defences, making it supposedly immune from any and all attacks.
Incidentally, in your first comment you questioned the idea of the region of the Red Sea being full of 'bad neighbours', but I would say that's true. The region is full of well armed and funded (by Iran) militant groups, who have a surprisingly capable arsenal of weapons and technologies, such as surveillance/reconnaissance drones and guided missiles. That's all you need to have a go at a ship. There are militant groups in the sinai adjacent to the red Sea, in parts of Egypt that the government does not control. These groups also present a threat to Israel, a country that the US is currently trying to defend, so I think it's perfectly reasonable to state that us navy ships are going to be a target for these groups.
That's an accepted risk. If you look at Taiwan wargames they basically always include a US carrier being sunk.
Please turn your volume up ! We can turn ours down if needed . Can hardly hear and my volume is up all the way !!!!
I love WSJ analysis but whoever was in charge of the audio of this video should be reprimanded or fired. The volume is so low that I have to max out my PC volume just to barely hear the narrator. Otherwise, great content
Thanks to the US Navy for protecting our free world. Greetings from Vienna
Thank you!! ❤️
Wow being on a 1950s to 70s gearing class destroyer is very humbling to see the really cool stuff now. We had ASROC systems, mark 4 torpedoes, and 5 inch 38s, although rumor had it that some of the shells were LAZER guided! Woo hoo!
9😊😅😮😮😮😮😅😅😮😅😊
Soon lasers they will use high energy lasers on these ships for point defense.
A carrier group generally consists of around 30 ships.
The Carrier.
Various war ships.
Supply ships.
Recovery ships.
A hospital ship.
A submarine or two.
Carrier battle groups are relics from the past..
@@bigstuff52 in russia, yes, they are. Carrier battle groups go bump under a lot of ugly beds at night.
no recovery ships unless its a russian carrier group
Thanks for providing no more knowledge than the video did. Useless comment.
Definitely not 30. A single carrier group is usually 1 carrier, 3-6 warships, 1-2 submarines and 1-2 supply ships. In a large show of force deployment with allied vessels it might be say 15 vessels total.
Wow! Amazing!
Gunboat Diplomacy. It's a classic.
1853. Commodore Perry opens Japan to trade under Naval gunpoint.
@@kevinjenner9502 Who says YOU have the right to force other countries to trade (or anything else) that they do not want to do? Not in the U.S. Constitution.
I’m pointing out the International criminality of “US Gunboat Diplomacy” as it was used in the past.
@@davidb2206 China is using Hydropolitics to force South Asia and India into its political sphere. They build dams on rivers that feed into their countries.
You do know that China is doing an even more aggressive GD in South East Asia claiming practically everything with their extended 10-dash line, then 11, then 12, etc.
Different tactics, same geopolitics.
The Right of Self-determination is also at play.
Also, the US wasn't the only one interested in Japan. UK, France, and Russia were in on it to, so Japan just didn't want to fight too many enemies at once and opened up.
@user-tn8uu2cu8g You have no right to force any religion on other people. None.
Go America!
Tuff, intelligent,
defenders of the free world it is not a cliche.
Don’t forget the CIA…CIA Coups overthrowing the sovereign governments of Iran, Guatemala, Congo, Dominican Republic, S Vietnam, Brazil, Chile..
Since when is gunboat diplomacy considered defender ?
God Bless our Navy !
Nice... Good stuff...
These ships and their systems are different level.
As an average man in the street with no actual military experience just an interest in weapons and how they have developed over the years..... I find a carrier group such as what America has sent to aid Israel is such a powerfull and intimidating force.
There is 4 carrier groups there.
Love the title of the video.
Video should have been titled. How American Navy defense works in 5 minutes.
Anything anti-Iran propaganda is good for clickbait right about now.
@@Pgr-pt5ep I love how everything is Iranian-backed but they never mentioned American-backed when talked about Al-Qaeda/ISIS in Syria and Lybia or the terrorist groups in Kosovo. Or how about Saudi-backed wahhabists? How about Qatar-backed Hamas leaders? Hahahaha, what a joke. Also, the fact that the ME region is FAR from the US borders - why wouldn't the regional militant forces be backed by Iran? Does the US own the Middle East? What a joke.
If another countrys war ships came into our waters and we attacked them... would their response be considered 'defense'?
@@charlespancamo9771 What part of "international waters" confuses you?
Why is the volume 3x lower than other videos?
The fundamental problem with defending against missiles .Missiles are unmanned and relatively cheap , while destroyers are very costly and full of people.
Fire a barrage of of missiles, and eventually one will likely get through, with severe consequences.
The US Navy needs to seriously ramp up its unmanned systems projects.
A destroyer accompanied by a herd of powerful unmanned craft would totally change the calculus.
There are other defensive capabilities not discussed.
@@njpmethat’s right… loose lips sinks ships!
High powered lasers, They are already being deployed. Pennies per round. The nuke powered boats easily power the systems, but no weapon is perfect, hence layering as stated.
Amazing !! God bless these troops & God bless America 🇺🇸🙏🏾
I have a strong feeling that there are other lethal systems on board that are not disgusted.... As they should not be.
Disgusting, but worthy of discussion!
well yeah SM-2 came out in the 1980s or so, they have SM-6 but will only fire them at high priority targets, they also have SM-3 for shooting down ballistic missiles and ESSM for shooting down anything that makes it past SM-2/6 but they dont have anything crazy, highly doubt they are keeping too much from us as we couldn't do anything with the information, they are however currently making ship launched versions of missiles that have recently gone into service with the USAF and navy planes which are very good missiles, also pretty sure the US have just started development on a hypersonic missile
disgusted, or discussed? 😳
@@wheelsofafrica good 1 ... read mine 😊
we know allah. allah been around long time. when i was a kid, a stranger to our neighborhood was nicknamed allahmana booches. but he was not from allah bama, maybe it was allahn town , not sure..alla we knows is alllah aint no god. most likely southern at best.. as when we call the team together "allah yall gather round". but we didn't think it was cus of god,, just the coach.. sorry , not sure the point of your lil poem there..tutu.. but allah us cant play that. @user-tn8uu2cu8g
We need this in WPS
Always find it a bit weird that all this information is public, lol.
There's a lot of information that is open to the public.
how, what is anyone going to do with it? it gives no one any benefit knowing this, what would benefit them is the specs of all this, really the only specs they gave was the ranges of the radar and missile, the missile is old tech and i doubt the range stated for the radar is the actual range
@@gibbo_303 We (the US) probably have hundreds of people assigned to decoding Chinese military weapons and hardware.
We (the US) literally have a section of the Airforce called China Aerospace Studies Institute.
_The China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) is a United States Department of the Air Force think tank which examines all facets of the People's Republic of China and Chinese Communist Party's efforts to project power in the air and space domains. Part of Air University, it provides support to the Air Force, the Space Force, the joint services, civilian federal agencies, and academic research institutions._
Fun Fact: This branch released the unclassified version of the China Rocket Force last year. It created a big problem for Xi since much of the intel was likely gathered by the CIA via a turned Chinese spy / agent. And, it's responsible for some of the missing officers in China's military.
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
@@HKim0072 Yes. It's amazing what can be obtained through either moral authority or money or sex.
WOO THATS POWER💪
Very interesting, thanks for the upload.
Volume is too low.
I bet Seagulls have learned to not go near these ships
Instant classic!
i Loved the video. very interesting
I'm a retired Navy Senior Chief. I served on 2 different guided missile cruisers. Any of our Cruisers that have Aegis and the VLS can defeat the entirety of the Iranian Navy by themselves. That's a fact.
Yeah okay. Like they’re just gonna sit there with their hands folded. I’m american, but it amazes me how delusional and egotistical we are. The world Doesn’t revolve around us and we aren’t invincible.
I think surface ships will need their own horde of drones in the future. Maybe different sizes and types can be packed into launchable modules in VLS tubes. They would be used to further confound the terminal guidance systems of anti-ship missiles beyond the Burkes' and Ticonderogas' current EW and other capabilities. In a peer fight the incoming warheads could be nuclear. It will be critical to have a way to confound those guidance systems, because, as you know, all the missile needs to do is get close.
@@JohnDoe-pd4jo the world does revolve around the US actually.... it is the most powerful country in the world. Im not American but that's just a fact
is the volume very low for everybody else.????
It also has the 4xpack per tube Sea Sparrow at about half the range of the SM-2. Using SM-2s to shoot down cheap Chinese drones is overkill by a lot. We will bankrupt ourselves at that rate without ever going to war.
Drones can be handled by CIWS Phalanx.
@@jeremygrimes9006 only at super close range
Yes, Lets have a replay of the Gulf Of Tonkin. Wall Street Journal, part of Operation Mockingbird
False flag incoming. Blackrock, Rothschilds, "bankers", are all foaming at the mouth for another war.
My son is currently aboard a DDG that is probably somewhere in the middle east. We don't ask and he can't say where. It's a relief to his mother and I knowing how capable the ship is to defend itself. It helps this old Marine to sleep at night!
Thank you to your family.
@@lisarussell8874 Thank you for what ? 😂
@billjohnson7347 the Russians are keeping hypersonic-armed jets above the Black Sea lest your son misbehave.
My Son is out there also. I got a call from him a few weeks ago. It was so nice to hear his voice! Sending love and prayers to those serving during the holidays. ❤
Gun Boat is diplomacy is still a thing.Im glad this one is on our side
Wow this is really some technology there. Very advanced
4:43 Guys, that's not an american strike group. That's a british strike group.
Thank you. I went to the comments looking for _somebody_ to point that out. I'm no expert, but I know that the US doesn't use ramps. And the 2 towers also stood out. I know it's a short list, but I had to go looking for who does to identify it. How lazy of the video producers to use stock footage of another country's navy in a video talking about the _American_ navy.
Wall Street Journal, do you guys actually do some audio quality check before posting it on RUclips? Your audio is too freaking soft!
The sm-2 is ancient by now . I’m surprised when I looked it up the 3 wasn’t used and the 2 is still carried
SM-3 is for anti-ballistic only, they are also using newer blocks of the SM-2 and why waste SM-6 on something that can be shot by SM-2s that will need decommissioning soon anyway
One thing that Aegis can do that wasn't mentioned is that it could take control of weapons on other ships...
Let's say there's 6 US Destroyers with one in the middle of a 5 pointed star formation, they can set the one in the middle to be the command and control ship and that ship would consolidate all of the radar data from all 6 ships and launch weapons from all 6 ships to engage multiple threats at the same time using whatever asset is closest with the highest probability of intercept...
Aegis is the closest thing we've got to Skynet...
This ship just got hit today, two days after this video was posted. I still haven’t heard details.
wrong, that was commercial ships that got hit, this just intercepted missiles or drones fired towards it
@@gibbo_303 yep, that wasn’t known when I posted this. I was hoping to get updates.
Phalanx CWIS saved many of lives on FOB Shank.
No doubt these are vary capable warships in both defensive and offensive roles thank you to sailors and marines who protect our nation
Protecting the corporate interests in that region- there is no U.S,.sovereignty there.
The question should be why is a US submarine doing in the middle East??
When is us gonna leave the middle east alone?
It's been 20 years of us milking oil in the middle east. How many more innocent people and soldiers have to die?
Isn't Aegis more commonly associated with Athena? Ya know, the famous shield with Medusa's head on it?
Both Zeus and Athena.
no speak Greek 😊
Wow, is the audio mixing guy at the WSJ deaf? The audio levels are so low.
Great video.
Irony: You are US Sailor in the Persian Gulf. The Iranians have infiltrated YOUR own neighborhood back home, without your knowledge, by your own deceitful politicians. Now they know where your kid goes to school, smart guy.
I personally think that crew on this ship was well trained. Also, lucky that the systems were all working the problem with the systems when you start overwhelming /system meaning that an attacked with over whelming target /good chance of hitting the target. And you can see this in the defense for Israel not all the missiles are knocked down.
A bunch of Carneys...
Ah yes...the old "em kay 41" VLS.
what are the first two letters in the common abbreviation for the word "mark"
@@AdmiralZhao007 M and K but no one says M K, they say mark because that is the proper word
@@gibbo_303 i say it and so does everyone i know
Remember the USS Liberty Incident.
Any country attacking ships on high seas and sea lanes should be considered as an act of war and UNSC should act on fast track action as it could be further deflowering its status as Security Counsel.
So you are saying anything the American government and NATO were doing is legal.
What a biased mind!
@@muhammadsulaiman1361Drones attacked commercial ships on international waters, and they were get shot down on international waters.
Why is the audio level so low?
USS destroyers or Warmongering destroyers that is the questions?
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack.
Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
US depends on international trade and influence for its prosperity.
To be sure this didn't happen off the coast of America. Remember the u.s.s liberty
you can fool some of the people some of the time.... why don't Americans have a living wage, health care system for it Citizens, free education, or Bullet trains from coast to coast ?
Maybe their system works as intended without unnecessary and ruinous luxuries.
Because that's what they chose democratically as is their right..
Stop sharing all the secrets, the enemies are watching.
now it's hit.
Caught that Roosevelt reference at the end. He must be a navy boy lol
WSJ please stop giving our Adversaries details about our warships capabilities.
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
May be receiving in a casing whose shear strength>>Shock-Impact Strength of missile.
Wow you got everything right, and I am shocked the DOD has not taken this video down, you gave out a lot of sensitive information in this video. More than I would have expected the DOD would allow. lol
What they gave out isn't sensitive. AEGIS does way more than discussed, and even THAT isn't classified.
In addition, his numbers he stated were greatly understated as referring to actual capability. Former USN OS2 @@jeremygrimes9006
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
Adversaries, like the US, perform SIGINT missions to examine US systems. They know almost whatever the US Navy lets them see in operation. They just can't afford it in the volume we can, and they're usually behind us in the details. An AEGIS processor can have "gears" of speed and resolution that they have never seen before because the Navy never shifts into them where they might be examined. Cards to play. Secret sauce ready to go.
🙌 🙏 ❤️ ✝️🇺🇲May God protect America
What is the US navy doing in the Middle East?
Dont underestimate Iran.
I hate how they speak out “ m k” instead of “mark”
Oh, because naturally, invading someone's home, robbing it, and leaving chaos behind is just a delightful pastime, right? And when the homeowner has the audacity to fight back, you get all offended and decide to bring in your mafia buddies to help you out. Because, clearly, in your twisted world, criminal entitlement deserves a standing ovation for sheer idiocy and disregard for others
Too unmatched
Us destroyers are old as fk😂
wrong, some of them are some of them are brand new, the old ones are also heavily upgraded
Either it's democracy or tyranny! After ww2, there no question. Diplomacy only works when one carries the biggest stick. It's about time we deployed the stick. It's already on.
This whole thing has never been in real battle vs worthy opponents
Because there aren't any
@@rogerthat4545 so how do tell if the systems works..?
@@icemanzw I guess you'll never know
@@rogerthat4545 unless there is real war like Ukraine Russia level or above
@icemanzw will some fantasy country exist then?? Most of Russia's black sra fleet was put on the bottom of the ocean by a country with no navy.
I'm supposed to believe China is any better?
What happens to the pieces of the missel, bombs, and drones?
Is it rational for the U.S. and various media to inform the entire planet about American offensive and defensive capabilities? Even IF other major adversaries have some idea of our military capabilities, isn’t it “aiding and abetting” or even treasonous to make military capabilities widely known to anyone who could use that information to plan and develop counter technologies? Or is military and civilian leadership of the U.S. just a cadre of juveniles wearing uniforms or civilians so stupid as to make things easier for adversaries for some other unfathomable rationale?
yep its called propaganda, also many people are just generally curious, tbh i would probably even watch a chinese version of this boasting about their destroyers
what just happened? 😮
It's a standard part of deterrence to publish the basic facts so that potential enemies know that it wouldn't go well for them to attack. Similarly to demonstrate that it works having done acceptance tests and sea trials. USN rocks!
Don't worry. The Russians and Chinese know a lot more about these subjects than the American public. However, as we see in Ukraine, they haven't necessarily figured out how to make and use these things as well as the highly paid US MIC. I didn't hear anything that was a serious revelation. USAF vet, Avionic Sensor Systems, Electrical Engineer, PE.
@@lonpfrb I can appreciate the thinking behind what you describe. However, I still think it's better to keep potential enemies in the dark about military capabilities. Keeping them guessing and in doubt about capabilities I believe is just as good of a deterrent and keeps potential enemies in the dark about our capabilities. It's better for defense purposes to keep others guessing. But these videos given them detailed information about what we're doing or even ideas we have that others may never have thought of. So I still think is a stupid mistake. Look at the Manhattan Project, did they advertise what the US was doing? All the US has to do is inform potential enemies the US has the capability to counter anything they may come up with without giving them any details. I think American leaders are naive and stupid.
More volume please...
4:43 that is a british carrier strike group
Stay safe Americans❤
It's disturbing how so many WSJ followers don't question the American aggression overseas.
Freedom of Navigation - look it up.
Like lambs to the slaughter...
idk maybe u should look at what china has been doing before commenting on the US as they are actually aggressing, the US is just defending itself, its allies and civilians
@@gibbo_303 Lol thats what they said while murdering a million iraqis and where are the imaginary wmd's?
@@ZekeRiversI don't see any China/Russia war ships near Miami.
One SM2 missile is 1.3 million dollars
Id like to know how they know what is a threat and what is a UAP? Spy-1 radar tracks "fleets" of UAPs just hanging out a few dozen miles away so we dispatch f18SH's and we get those videos released, when they (jets) get there ,.the arleigh burke radar shows them maneuvering in ways that cant be explained, how do we differentiate these things from threats? We can dispatch a jet for every UAP as there are too many of them
There’s actually a lot of factors that go into it. It’s not just the system itself making the decisions it self there are operators that sit at consoles that decipher what’s real and what’s not…. To get some what if a concept refer to the movie battleship.