【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：六四事件後新加坡怎樣幫香港人度過難關？ 金庸、李嘉誠有何反應？ 李光耀怎樣看待香港這個對手？ 《大師訪談錄》（2024-03-14）
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 мар 2024
- 1989年，六四事件後，那時剛加入新加坡政府的楊榮文，被李光耀委任負責AIP（Approval in Principle）項目，為香港人提供原則批准。彼時的新加坡對六四事件有何反應？李光耀為何決定發聲？也因此他結識了金庸，金庸對六四事件有何反應？對大陸的態度有何變化？
2013年，梁振英任命楊榮文為香港經濟發展委員會的成員。香港質疑聲不斷，新加坡國會同樣質疑，皆認為他出任港府智囊不利於己方競爭。他怎麼看港星關係？ 怎麼看李光耀的策略性友誼智慧？讓我們一起聽聽新加坡前外交部部長楊榮文的分析。
#楊榮文 #六四事件 #金庸 #李光耀 #李嘉誠 #灼見名家 #北京 #新加坡 #香港 #梁振英 #郭鶴年 #天安門 #星港之爭
🌟歡迎訂閱本頻道，觀看更多楊榮文系列RUclips影片：
第一集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：以巴熱戰之後...
第二集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：失去美國支持...
第三集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：未來5年中國...
第四集（本集）： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：六四事件後新...
第五集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：中華文明為何...
第六集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文：中國怎樣處理...
全集： • 【字幕】新加坡前外交部長楊榮文縱論天下：中美...
🌟歡迎閱讀講座文章：
www.master-insight.com/?p=374397
加入成為會員，優先看新影片和獲取獎賞：
/ @masterinsightmedia
追蹤Facebook、Instagram專頁，攝取名家智慧：
/ masterinsightcom
/ master_insight_media
訂閱WhatsApp頻道，一手掌握重點分析：
tinyurl.com/22jkxcm4
谦和有力，充满幽默感和魅力！新加坡人之光，吾辈典范。
一楼还在？ 杨 真的是一位具有敏锐政治眼光和卓越亲和力的政治家，他敢于吐露真实想法 而且极具语言表达天赋，当然本视频的中文翻译也非常到位。 点赞！！！
My walking encyclopedia.
You can memories all details, you have gone through.
You are a man, with the most analytical knowledge.
楊先生立場客觀公正，觀察細膩精準，受用良多！最後的問答，精簡扼要，不可錯過！同時也感謝主辦單位，非常用心！🙏
好看！愛看！謝謝楊先生不一樣的視角分享，謝謝@灼見名家 字幕有水準
坦克人这个谣言传了多少年了？事实是坦克绕过来这个人，他还上去挑衅，然后他的朋友把他拉走了，什么事都没有！！！！这些视频都是可以深究的
Excellent speech by ex-FM of Singapore George Yeo.
I am Singaporean n i have alot HK friends in HK, HK n Singapore like brothers,we don't like 2 compare what it is n sincerely wish HK all best
What makes you think you can represent the entire country? I'm Singaporean and I don't give a fark abt HK 🥱
@@mazel2169 where did Jimmy say that he spoke on behalf of the entire country? Relax! 🙂
@@wpgc2 "HK n Singapore like brothers,we don't like 2 compare what it is n sincerely wish HK all best"
This.
@@mazel2169 I give you that but still, just relax!
@@wpgc2 Did something i uttered hit a raw nerve? Relax bro, it's just the F-word.
❤听一听前辈的政治经历，使我们有智慧面对未来。香港与新加坡是难兄难弟。
搞笑。香港有大樹可靠。
欸，你香港才是難弟😅😅
港人笑足星加坡人幾十年，你當人係兄弟😂唔係掛😂
It's amazing that most Taiwanese people don't even know what's really going on .... and they think that the Americans are their friends.
they dreamed and still dreaming in the buttom of their small well
After Hu Yaobang’s death in April 1989, students mourning the passing of a liberal leader, took to the street to demonstrate against corruption and called for more political reforms. The CPC leaders took a liberal view on the demonstration, allowing the students to march to the Tiananmen Square. Once the students occupied the square, they decided to stay put. In the beginning, the students felt strong and legitimate. However, as the time passed, they felt restless. When the students wanted to leave, the student leaders discouraged them to do so. One of the student leaders was Chai Ling. They demanded that the CPC leaders were to meet them in person. Several dialogues were arranged as the CCP leaders wanted to end the hunger strike and maintain order. Sheryl WuDunn of The New York Times wrote : “what was remarkable was not just that the meeting took place but that the Government televised nearly all of it, apparently as a concession to a student’s demand”.
Chai Ling, gave a private interview to a US journalist Philip Cunningham on May 28, several days before the clampdown. She said that their goal was to create bloodshed so that people that were apolitical would be pissed off with the government, and they would rise against the CPC. As there’s little progress as days went by, she cried out of frustration, as she badly wanted the results (bloodshed) but she could not reveal the truth to the students. But when asked by Cunningham whether she’s ready to die for the cause, she said she did not want to die, and the whole cause was not worth dying for. This video is still available online.
Then finally, on the 3rd June 1989, the government decided that they would move in to remove the protesters. Loudspeakers on the square were turned on, calling the students and workers to leave the square. Then when the deadline came, the military vehicles were given the instruction to move in, all of a sudden, some unknown worker demonstrators armed with Molotov cocktails, and they threw the ignited Molotov cocktails into the cabin of the slow-moving vehicles and tanks.
The cabin caught fire and the soldiers had to run for their life, but they were stopped by the mobs. The mobs beat them up and burned them to death. That was when some of the soldiers decided to open fire at the charging mobs. This happened along the Chang’An Dajie, especially near Muxidi. AP journalist Jeff Widener said in an interview that that street was so violent that he was knocked into unconsciousness and when he got up he saw soldiers being killed.
All these were happening while the students were safely staying in the square. Finally, the students agreed to leave the square, and they were seen marching out of the square and vowed to return another time. Years later, the BBC’s Beijing correspondent at the time, James Miles came clean that there was no casualty in the square. A Spanish crew also produced a video detailing how the students were given ample time to leave. A Taiwanese singer turned activist, Hou Dejian, also personally vouched that there was no death as he was the last to leave the square around 6 am on the 4th of June.
While the peaceful part of the protest was genuine and legitimate, the violent part of the movement was definitely not. The CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy(NED) and the Voice of America (VOA), were involved in the plotting of the regime change. The CIA moved Gene Sharp, author of the Color Revolution manual, to Beijing where financier George Soros had incorporated the eponymous Fund for the Reform and Opening of China. CIA Director George H.W. Bush withdrew Ambassador Winston Lord from Beijing and replaced him with James Lilley, an operative experienced in regime change. They infiltrated the universities and recruited some professors and student leaders, as well as paying some of the workers to ignite a violent unrest on that night. They knew that they controlled the media that would garner enough support from the world outside as long as they produce a well-scripted plot. For e.g., the VoA broadcast that PLA units were firing on each other because some units were loyal to the protestors and some units were with the government. The VoA and U.S. media outlets tried to create confusion and panic among government supporters. Just prior to June 4 they reported that China’s Prime Minister Li Peng had been shot and that Deng Xiaoping was near death, which was not true.
The now symbolic photo of “the Tank Man” was one of the most misleading images in modern history. While the photo seemed like tanks were ready to roll over a protester, full video footage revealed that this was an entirely different scenario. The man, holding two bags of groceries, saw the incoming tanks, and he stood in the way. The tanks tried to avoid him by going around him, but the man refused to give way, and then he even climbed up the tank and talked to the soldiers inside the tank. He then climbed down from the tank unharmed and left the tank with another man in bicycle. But Western mainstream media twisted this event and marketed it as “brutal crackdown on protesters”. The full video is still available online.
To be sure, they almost got what they wanted. As for the Hong Kong and Taiwan activists, they were ready conspirators. Hong Kong was facing an imminent return to the Communist country, and Taiwan at that time still considered itself the legitimate China. Both Chinese cities had reasons for a successful revolution.
Perhaps, overall, the CIA and NED did get what they wanted; after 29 years, 18,000 Hongkongers still commemorate the June 4th Incident with candle lights in the Victoria Park, and the call for the end of the CPC did not die down. As a matter of fact, 1989 probably gave birth to the Pro-Independence Taiwanese and Hongkongers.
In 2019, following a genuine protest by ordinary Hong Kong residents against an extradition bill proposed by the Hong Kong government, violent riots were orchestrated by the NED and the MI6, where Molotov cocktails were thrown at police forces and public facilities were burned down by violent mobs. Many ordinary Hong Kongers had the opportunity to see first hand huge discrepancies in what really happened on the ground to what was reported by Western media. It turned out that this riot was a blessing in disguise for this section of the population, as after they have seen reminiscence in both the riots in Hong Kong and Tiananmen, they finally see the truth in Tiananmen.
Don't waste your time. You think the lord of karma has listened to you only.
I did and I know what was said as the truth. The US sowed the seeds of destruction and anarchy through the NED and NGOs. Even now in my own country, laws have been set up to ensure the NED and its supporters are restricted in its activities.
one of the most misleading images in modern history，你这么瞎说大实话，他们会追杀你。
@@nofartcheck3952he felt he is Machiam George Yeo, whom btw I don’t rate highly. 😂
thanks for the true fact on the tianang meng uproar of irresponsible students misleading hypocrite the student leaders
我以前在香港的茶餐廳吃吃時他們也是非常沒禮貌的。近來我的女兒和他的香港朋友吃飯，結果也是敗興而歸。她香港的朋友更是氣到要發飆！不只是人手問題也是素質問題。
社会文明度的问题
為什麼我日日吃茶餐廳/快餐/酒樓都沒有被人不禮貌對待??
@@426dfv因为你已经被奴化了。觉得那种态度是正常的。被骂久了，觉得那不是骂。被恶劣态度久了，已经下意识避开让服务生发飙的事。
special breed indeed, insufferable, fk em
以前大陆服务差，现在去香港真的受不了拿态度。大陆好太多了。
👍👍👍❤
how can I find English transcript of this speech? Thank you
「有一道絢麗的彩虹在召喚那些有冒險精神的人。彩虹的盡頭有豐富的發現。對於年輕人和不太老的人，我說看看地平線，找到彩虹，去騎它。並非所有人都會富有；不少人會發現金礦；但所有追求彩虹的人都會有一個快樂和令人興奮的旅程並獲得一些收益。”
~李光耀~
When is the speech delivered?
14/3/2024
George Yeo lost the 2011 election in the GRC (group representation constituency) where 5 MPs were band together as a single group for election. He, the Malay MP were the favourites with the Singaporeans in the GRC but not the 2 ladies; there was also a new member standing first time. The idea of GRC is to use the heavyweight MPs to anchor new potential MP. This time the ruling party lost big. The bookies were taking bets against the ruling party will lose the GRC.
I love to hear GY whether in the Singapore government and out of government. His insights were interesting and I bought only his books among the ex-Singapore ministers.
He has move on to do other things which would not be possible has he remained in the Singapore government.
We lost a knowledgeable and sharp politician who could be a potential candidate to be our next PM in 2011 GE to a opposition party whose leader took 4 year responding to a desperate call for help from an underprivileged Singaporean family.
@@pengui6152if he is knowledgeable and sharp. Then he should have know full well that he is operating in the field of democracy and he needs to win elections. It is his own responsibility to make sure that he gets re-elected. The fact is he has failed his GRC team and Singapore. Because he took it for granted that he can sit through and win the elections. As the main figurehead in his GRC team, he failed to build any rapport with his people, relying extensively on the PAP brand name. You can see that he totally didn't know how to react when faced with a fight from WP. All I see is he is great when a red carpet is rolled for him to speak from above everyone else.
If he will lost so easily against WP, can you imagine him leading Singapore? To fight against real opponents outside Singapore? Where the enemy can come in any form and from anywhere? He lost in a fight where the odds are with him, so it is what it is.
杨荣文是华人，不是马来国会议员，他是新加坡前外交部长。
@@wendygwee9037 you are reading it wrongly. He didn't mean George Yeo is a Malay MP (which is too far-fetched, nobody will get mistaken). He meant George Yeo and another Malay MP are well-liked. He was in a GRC, meaning he is not the only candidate in his team. There is George Yeo, another Malay MP and two more ladies plus a new guy.
Quite obvious that you are not a Singaporean when you can get mistaken like this. Maybe you should refrain from commenting too much about other countries' politics.
He should stay on and fight to try and win back his old ward. He was a soldier but did not choose to fight on. Pity!!!!
In 1989, the Coldwar has not ended, Singapore has yet to establish formal ties with China, and Hong Kong was still under British jurisdiction. In 2019, the Coldwar has ended and Hotwar was brewing, China was an important partner with Singapore and the rest of the world, and Hong Kong has been part of China for more than 20 years so it was domestic unrest that China has full jurisdiction of and foreign governments should not interfere.
Since the opening of China in 1978, Singapore had made it clear that she would be the last SE Asian country to establish formal ties with China due to her Chinese population.
errr Coldwars has never "ended"
什么情，什么义，都是骗人的鬼话。
最实际的利益与权力主导了为什么89年新加坡帮香港，而19年置身于外。两件都是颜色革命！
💗💗💗
1989 was very different from 2019 .
1989, many who were spooked were wealthy entrepreneurs and highly qualified professionals in law, medicine engineering etc., and their potential contributions were welcomed around the world. Singapore's global position then was far from today - and the entry threshold was lower.
Many enterprising HK people then could potentially migrated their business to Singapore.
By 2019, more than two decades since 1997, the entrepreneurs left in HK were mainly dabbling in real estate, not manufacturing. Those in Finance only had products tied to industries in the mainland. Singapore has produced plenty of professionals and already attracting talents globally. There was relatively less benefit to offer any special arrangements for HK people and unwise to appear unfriendly to the biggest and growing economic force in Asia.
Furthermore, unlike the dissenters of 1989, the 2019 dissenters were mainly dupes, unwitting and otherwise, of foreign actors.
Singapore will not want easily manipulated protesters who imposed their will against the unwilling public, disrupting people from traveling on public transport and commercial flights, as well as assault innocent civilians based on citizenship.
Who told you? Have you conducted a poll on it?😂😂😂 The top talents had already left Hong Kong by 2019.
@@Scambuster491 absurd. you suck
算了吧，頂咩尖?都喺D睇唔清國際形勢及變局嘅上當手足@@Scambuster491
@@Scambuster491how u know?
@@Scambuster491 Do you have any evidence that top talented people already left HK by 2019?
香港天天拿新加坡比，都不知道他们比什么还骂新加坡。浪费时间。还有帮他们做什么
Merlion mighty 🙂 Peter 60
没有字幕
有，点击cc
Didn't know that GY wasn't offered a job in GLC! It is a pity! HK benefits from his contribution. HK people faced with uncertainty after returning to Mainland. GY always said HK and SG benefits from china trade. HK people perhaps didn't realize how dependent they are with china market perhaps until they loose it. SG had tried so hard to expand its base. Connect with india, US and china. As china slows down, HK will have to look elsewhere for growth.
Yes, he turned down the offer in GIC as he felt it would be still a govt job and ppl would think he cant get himself a job in the private sector with equally good pay as the haters of high minister salary would always like to put for the, and the govt took pity on him and gave him the GCI job. GY was paid almost double in Kerry than what he got as a minister. He also turned down to run for Presidential Election, and immediately Robert Kwok invited him to join Kerry.
@@tanky815 He said in his speech he was not offered. They asked him whether he needed help. He can easily get a private sector job due to his extensive connection with politicians in the region as FM and TM.
I think GY is better than that (beggng for a job in Tamesek). There was a Philip Yeoh who always want LKY to make him CEO of SIA, but for some reason LKY never grant him. GY is above PY.
字幕？
請打開
89年的64事件，当时很多海外华人很愤怒，对中国很失望。现在回过头来看，邓公的强硬政策正确无比，正是当年的强硬保住了共产党的统治，然后才会有后面奋起直追告诉发展的40年。89年就是一场颜色革命，只不过比较隐蔽。。
當年香港人都認爲新加坡沒有自由的國家，李光耀是獨裁者。香港人想移民都會去英國，加拿大，澳洲，美國，新西蘭。很少會選擇移民去新加坡的。
Even today, Sg in the eyes of the Hongkongers is nothing, just a small island!
Whereas HongKong is now China’s little bitch.
@@vmemory2918ironically they actually expected sg do something for them in 2019😂😂😂 wise move LHL “supported” extradition bill and now we see the consequences of hk’s falling. How foolish sometimes we all know history repeats but nobody learn from it
我非常支持香港人移民去欧美，最好去了就别回来，这些香港人认知底下，离开香港他们什么都不是
香港沦陷？沦陷在英国殖民者手中？
when other have saved your life, be thankful sincerely to them, but no need to give out your own faith. in ww2 and in malaya peninsula an injured anti Japanese fighter was saved by their Japanese enimy. at the end he worked for his live saving enimy to capture and kill his leaders. dr yeo knows well this history.
金庸原来还有法国国籍啊？
Mr. George Yeo has had left politics for more than over one-decade ago, since leaving Singapore politics, then he was involved in logistics/shipping business based in Hong Kong. Since after his recent retirement, he is now apparently back into serious & regular action, for what ends ?. At over 70 years plus old, that will be difficult even for the next possible post of Singapore President ?.
If he had wanted to elect for president, he would had done so years ago ... by him on the outside, personally, he can do more as an outside voice
Whats wrong with his age? Few in the current PAP cabinet can match GY's sharpness of mind and deep insights into geo-political events
@@wf645 Checking back to events & situation some 10-years ago, it may have been indeed a rather sad missed opportunity. Opine; Perhaps, now he may have decided to nurture or possibly re-create, the same opportunity back once again, via making interesting prominent speeches and appearing regularly for public interviews etc.etc. Someone should ask him whether he has still any SG President ambition ??. Also, interestingly, during his recent interview with the "South-China-Morning-Post" posted on RUclips, he said openly & remarked:... "I'm Chinese", instead of "Singaporean Chinese" or "Singaporean of Chinese ethnicity" ... but just simply; "I'm Chinese", may not go down too well with all Singaporeans. That's just my "Two-Cents" worth. ruclips.net/video/pEQ-a6sgjvc/видео.html
@@Fr.VeniceLAI You can choose to interpret certain reply with certain labelling assumption. That said, I would assume in the interview GY is trying to bring across the context of ethnicity and civilisation of Chinese, where Chinese as a race is holding our head higher due to the accomplishments of China, is not wrong as per se. In such instance, one would identify as ethnicity, instead of nationality is not wrong.
One does NOT need nationality to identify our ethnicity.
Unfortunately, anyone coming from China is called Chinese which is both identified as an ethnicity and a race. 来自中国的华人是中国人，华人就是华人或华族。English as a language is less sublime to other languages, where is mix mash words, using my previous sentence as an illustration. Unlike population from France is called French, etc.
At the end of the day, its about content and context … which is subjected to various forms of interpretation. i.e word games …
@@wf645 Do appreciate your comment, so that this most interesting discourse about the a/m Gentleman and the fascinating discussion about PRChina can continue. Firstly, are making some excuses and speaking on the gentleman's behalf ??. I would also wonder, whether any Singaporean of Chinese descent, reading this discourse ... would call himself or herself as just "I'm Chinese", ... without some other accompanied words of explanation or further elaboration. In all context and interpretation, "I'm Chinese" means someone who is a Chinese National, holding the Citizenship of the People's Republic of China. Interestingly, when i visited Taiwan R.O.C., i never came across any single Taiwanese ever saying, "I'm Chinese", but only ... "I'm Taiwanese". What say you ?.
官嗆口事心非😂
You so clever you teach LKY son to get real job
😂😂😂😂
What ever he comment that his own though.
And Hong Kong belong to China all things have change.
Due to China and US friendship is affecting banking system have change.
Hong Kong retailers interest have change.
International have withdrawn investment.
Is there any worthy from him?😂
George pro china !
You pro west!
新加坡最杰出的前外交部长。
应该是拉惹勒南。
why?! just because he is China-friendly?😅
Hip doesn't lie.😂
为何不檢讨为啥会败选
Karen. More Karens.
一口流利英文的買少見少了…
总是一脸苦相，教人看着好不舒服。
現實香港已經是中國的一座城市，國安法，23條，之後解除邊界開放大陸關卡。那就是香港末日，亞洲金融中心已經被新加坡取代
新加坡取代香港? 佢有本事咩? 新加坡没有國安法? 没有23條? 仲話香港末日? 你慢慢發你既舂青春秋大夢啦. Hahahahaha
新加坡没有国安法吗？今天的变化 只是中美博弈的一个附带影响而已。
@@426dfv无知的人。。。新加坡早就有国安法了，但是叫不同方式 Internal Security Act(内部安全法) 。你也别那么天真，同样西方多国也有内政/国安法。他们的更早也更加完善！ 这些西方国家会这么做，因为他们更理解国安的重要性与打压反对声。
@@wf645 你tag我？ 你沒有看見我問嗎？ 他說香港末日被新加坡取代因為有國安法，我就問他新加坡沒有國安法嗎？
你有没有想过一天，新加坡被中美联合逼着的日子。别总想着占便宜，随着两个竞争加剧，两个都不会看着新加坡这个肉蛋吃独食，会联合收割。别指望倒任何一边，你们不是嫡长子，收割的就是你，吃进去的全要吐出来
一位超离地的所谓政治家。 他的地盘到现在（执政党）都拿不回来。
It's called political experience. That's why he is invited as honorary guest speaker. You are being bitter to point out his election loss. We all have situations we can't control, we learn from it and move on with grace. Only mainland Chinese are sarcastic, insulting, criticizing, judgmental, binary thinking. He has experience at the highest government level that's why his opinions are sought. We don't have to agree 100% with everything he says.
下場后人民幣可香呢！
成日炒冷饭。超级无聊。
8964 Massacre
神也是你鬼也是你。
Who gives a duck about LKY? He wouldn't even take time to teach his children, so let him rest in peace. Singapore Tourism Board, stop pripagating.
If history repears itself, he would rather look after his boys
It’s an embarrassment to Singapore
無老美，新架波甚麼都不是!
你是哪根葱？！
对对对，你们最厉害！！！
自私的老美会帮新加坡？你太天真了，新加坡凭自己能力而强盛，老美只是在新加坡强盛之后对我们有想法，逼迫我们不得不尽量配合牠。老美落井，世界下石！！！
無美國印第安人被滅絕的犧牲，就沒有美國。
老美本就是一战，二战，冷战1 的战胜者，也是当今国际规则的计划者
就算是金庸，也看错了共产党。一个国家不允许混乱，一个站在坦克前的年轻人，如果真的是暴政，他无法站在坦克前，人民军队是宽容的，克制的，有情的。不是说站在坦克前，表现的就是勇敢，也可以是愚蠢和无知。
坦白說 看到2019的香港黑暴 我現在實在懷疑64的所謂報導⋯尤其是西方的報導。
这就是颜色革命啊，被美国人利用的一群人，64的初衷是好事，最后演变成暴动，什么坦克人这种西方惯用的渲染手法每一次颜色革命都有。@@nonono5661
@@nonono5661 苍蝇不叮无缝蛋，社会肯定是出问题了，但是解决问题必须要先稳定再解决，动乱能解决个锤子。但是给老邓那种尸山血海爬出来的人上眼药真是找死，老邓被老毛折磨的半死不活，稍微有点意志不坚强早就完犊子了，老毛最后时刻又启用老邓真是耐人寻味啊，老毛这人太神了，当年最绝望的年代能预测出战争结果也是真神仙了。但是他选一个非常懦弱的人继承大位就很奇怪了，按理来说根本不符合他选人的手段，他当年把那帮大将玩的服服帖帖，证明他是个能发现人才的人。总之很奇怪，吐露着阴谋诡计。。
那个年轻人最后还不是被自己的朋友拉走了。不过西方当然要掐头去尾，做出符合自己反华需求的新闻。造谣在所不计。新疆种族灭绝也能出来。
@@nonono5661 64当时的报道都wiki里面可以看到 倒是可以相信 但至于那些说血流成河的 就看看笑话吧
If he is that good why is he out of PAP?
Why is Dpp, a Taiwan party with bad, corrupt and incompetent leaders got elected again and again? Give me reasons. U think in one dimensional way, you can never be a wise person even though u maybe an intelligent man.
Have u heard that many wanted LKY to retired from politics in 2000s.?LKY, in my opinion, is the best leader a country could have, but yet many wanted him to retire though he is still active in mind.
馬來西亞讓郭鶴年成爲了首富，郭鶴年說自己是愛國華僑，請問他愛的是哪一國？
是中国让他成为首富，他的金龙鱼食用油在中国占据34%市场份额，是最大的食用油品牌。马来西亚把他的糖厂给霸占吞噬了，他才气愤到从马来西亚搬离到香港。他说的爱国华侨当然是指中国。
都爱 不可以吗？你爱父母 要问到底爱的是幅还是母吗？
@@Steven-oq7dx 中國有十萬棄嬰被美國收養，請問他們應該愛誰。
一位中國女棄嬰被美國收養，多年后當親生父母和她視頻的時候，母親對她說對不起，這個女孩說，“沒關係，這是好事”。
意思很簡單，當然如果不是被你們抛棄，我可能還沒有這麽好的美國日子可以生活。還要感謝你當年的抛棄。
郭鶴年出身在英屬馬來亞
在 马来西亚 和 新加坡 独立前，似乎所有的华人都爱大陆中国，他们的故乡！