Yes, live ur own life is a good principle for Sg. We give & take but there’s always limits. Mr George Yeo correctly pointed out manage calculated risks.
If I am not mistaken, the founding father of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew (新加坡国父李光耀) had said that "the future of Taiwan is not determined by the wishes of the people of Taiwan" ........ as the "Taiwan’s international fate was, in fact, sealed a long time ago at the Cairo Conference in 1943.." .... because it was agreed that, Japan🇯🇵, in order to end the war, must surrender unconditionally and to return back Manchuria, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands to CHINA ... Hence, from 1945 to 1971, when ROC🇹🇼 was the legitimate representative of CHINA to UN🇺🇳, every member state to the UN🇺🇳 (including US🇺🇲) knew full well that Taiwan is a province of CHINA (that is Taiwan belongs to CHINA) .. right? For 22 years, from 1949 to 1971, US🇺🇲 was helping Chiang Kai-shek of ROC🇹🇼 (which US🇺🇲 labelled as "Free China"), in the civil war, to "re-conquer" the mainland from the PRC🇨🇳 (which US🇺🇲 sanctioned it as "Red China) ... and today, US🇺🇲 has the cheek to deny that Taiwan is an integral part of China .... 废话!!
What Singapore wants to see is no wars ,peace. Whether there is a US base in Singapore or not. While certain wars may benefit us, it is bad money/ benefits and I am sure we don't need it.
As an Asian leading country, Singapore should stand on the right human side , knowingly US is a war hawk country ,joining it to carry out mission against GAZA 's supporters which has been doing rightfully human things in the red sea ,to force the genocide in GAZA.Contrary refuse to speak out & even aligned with US will be complicit,as Obama had said !"we all are complicit".China & Russia have taken a right stand :Talk & humanitarian support , strategic support .
As a Chinese saying, a far off relative is not as helpful as a neighbour. 远亲不如近邻. Thus, as Mr George Yeo said 60-40,55-45 etc is what Singapore way of balancing in international politics. Singapore is definitely not a Humpty Dumpty.
The last question George answered was deleted out leaving only 'His position has changed' refering 2 Xi position. Not an ethical thing to do in context of this discussion.
Why would a country depend solely on others? Everything is dispensable. You might be sacrificed once both superpower makes a pact, and one of the factors is getting rid of you as a sincere gesture since you can't contribute much benefit anyway. Wiser move is to become a centre piece that connects both ends.
Actually....When American ships call in Singapore...thè personnel are not allowed to be bunk.....They can only check in hotel as tourist...US army in Japan are not subjected to Japanese laws...but US army in Singapore is subjected to Singapore laws😅😊
These are the bright people that comes into politics in S’pore. Which is based on high qualifications & knowledge. They’re remunerated highly as well. But some Spore voters don’t s as appreciate the importance of such policies.
They identified a plot of land to build a disneyland in Singapore but cancelled the plans after the micheal fay canning verdict in 1992. Eventually they chose to build it in Hong Kong.
All along Singapore and Hong Kong was competing. On hindsight, they used Singapore as a bargaining chip leverage to ask for better deals from Hong Kong. They have always wanted Hong Kong and the China market.
@@Buttercookies0 Yes, Huawei is China' largest data-collecting agency, when someone works for Huawei, he is pretty much recruited by the civil service system of PRC already, so to speak.
@@ManjuTiger No wonder. Before I know abt this, I have some reservations on some of his speeches and interviews.Now I understand where he is coming from.
Looks like quite a number of Singaporeans in the comments section here. Singapore, as an open economy, and tiny nation, has many vulnerabilities. This is no surprise, and has been a basic consideration of the Government in the conduct of foreign and domestic policy. Singapore tries to be friends with everyone, even warring factions. The Government is ultra-cautious, often, going to extremes, in trying to maintain some semblance of balance and neutrality. A clear and jarring example is the recent Israeli-Gaza war. The Government in SG has made it clear that there'll be no discourse, no discussion in public fora on this matter, for fear that it will spark domestic animosties, especially among its Muslim population. One can also surmise that the Government wants to appear unconfrontational to Israel, and by extension, the US. This is pragamatic, but it also shows weakness in SG. Closing one's eye and covering one's ears, keeping one's mouth shut over a clear blatant genocide happening 'Live' daily, is a moral cop-out, even if self-presevation is the goal, and many Singaporeans will support a "Not my war" mindset. Contrast this to the SG Government's quick condemnation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine on Feb 24th 2022, and subsequently, imposed sanctions on Russia (symbolic, but still). The Government made it clear, on multiple occassions, that it wasn't staking sides in the conflict, but took a principled stance based on respect of sovereignty of nation-states under the UN Charter. A righteous position under International Law, clearly. Now, on Israel's genocide in Gaza, and this has ICJ (Internation Court of Justice) ruling, Singapore refuses to take any position. Let me remind those who are oblivious, more than 30000 civillians, more than a 3rd of them children, have been killed by Israeli Defence Force in the 130+ days of the war. By ANY measure, this is clear and blatant ethnic-cleansing, and by UN definition, genocide. (Note: Using the Hamas attack on Oct 7th 2023 to explain/justify/rationalize Israel's war in Gaza, ignores the 16years that Israel has kept Gaza and its 2.3million people, in an open-air prison, for no crime other than being Palestinian). Principles?
Let me make it clear to you. Singapore doesn’t stand on any side and only points to the rights side because we don’t want the public to stir up misunderstanding of hatred irregardless of Palestinian or the Jews as they are all innocent. Make it clear it is their government that cause this sad episode.
@@94876883 That is the most non-response response I've seen in a long while. You can actually lift what you wrote from my original comment. Congratulations, I guess.
@@lazarusguan2388 it's 2024, not 1964, head in the sand approach may not be the best option. Not sure you know much about what's happening in Ukraine and Gaza. Racial harmony is precious, but it cannot be preserved by dumbing down realities. We're not North Korea (a closed hermit nation) or the USA (possibly the most propagandized country on Earth), if 🙈🙉🙊is how we handle controversial issues, we become ignorant and risk being swayed and manipulated by those who want to use SG for their selfish goals. I believe Govt is aware, which is why Sham came out and made the statement he did about Ukraine (which Sylvia Lim was unfortunate to question in Parliament).
Many mainland Chinese have a problem with the naval base in Singapore which many countries’ navies, including the US warships, can call on. The thing is, it was there since the 90s. Those days, China and USA were in their honeymoon and China didn’t make much of a noise about the base then. Singapore also had a different set of security considerations then. China warships can call on our base if they so wish and they have actually done so on a few occasions. Stop using the base as any suggestion of our geopolitical inclination. This Chinese moderator obviously tried too hard to be smart here and could only show his glib.
There wasn't and isn't a US military base in Singapore. There is lots of misinformation out there and people didn't check facts and just repeat what others said. LKY once said: keep your friends close but keep your enemies closer. I think this is how Singapore survives by not choosing a side in this geopolitics contest between superpowers.
sg today is far more under usa's thumb than LKY' time. there are many american agents in sg media and academia. sg might be less at risk of colour revolution compared to to hk in late 201* but it's not entirely free of that risk.
What type of economic logic is this? If no country invest in Malaysia, will Malaysia survive in this modern world? Even huge China need investors too. HK CNN "China’s new premier, Li Qiang, has offered a hearty welcome to foreign companies in an effort to arrest a slump in business confidence that has exacerbated the country’s economic woes" Which country need only micro but not macro econ? Even N korea need that too.
Will there be a Japan without America investment after it received two Atomic bombs. Can there be a South Korea without America's investment on war effort in Vietnam ? Singapore is the largest investor in Vietnam for many years. Now America is forcing many investors to quit China to the benefit of Vietnam. So with Singapore and American investments it created a mini boom for Vietnam. So can there be a Vietnam without Singapore and America's help. Even China is investing in Vietnam.
新加坡人民很幸运拥有这样有独立思考能力有智慧的官员
很可惜，他已经离开新加坡政坛很多年了
Spore voters are not very bright though.
中国人民很幸运，因为他说的很多观点都是在国内网络可以看见的，国内人不陌生。香港人倒是不懂这些，所以要让杨先生来说给香港人听。
楊先生兩句便點明了以色列在美國的政治運作, 對世界分析有獨立見解.
Like George Yeo talks, very straight forward answers.
很優質的內容 又有字幕 謝謝 @灼見名家
新加坡人就是很务实，不说什么政治立场，分析得很客观。
只能说他是个出色的销售员🙂
外交家本来就应该这样子
非常睿智、理性、现实的分析
問題問得很好，製作精良，灼見視頻有品質👍
Yes, live ur own life is a good principle for Sg. We give & take but there’s always limits. Mr George Yeo correctly pointed out manage calculated risks.
Merlion mighty 🙂🙏
Mr George Yeo is very upfront and candid
EU needs to get rid of US stooge such as von de Leyen and NATO of Stoltenburg if Europe wants to get back on her own two feet.
👍👍👍
If I am not mistaken, the founding father of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew (新加坡国父李光耀) had said that "the future of Taiwan is not determined by the wishes of the people of Taiwan" ........ as the "Taiwan’s international fate was, in fact, sealed a long time ago at the Cairo Conference in 1943.." .... because it was agreed that, Japan🇯🇵, in order to end the war, must surrender unconditionally and to return back Manchuria, Taiwan and the Pescadores islands to CHINA ...
Hence, from 1945 to 1971, when ROC🇹🇼 was the legitimate representative of CHINA to UN🇺🇳, every member state to the UN🇺🇳 (including US🇺🇲) knew full well that Taiwan is a province of CHINA (that is Taiwan belongs to CHINA) .. right?
For 22 years, from 1949 to 1971, US🇺🇲 was helping Chiang Kai-shek of ROC🇹🇼 (which US🇺🇲 labelled as "Free China"), in the civil war, to "re-conquer" the mainland from the PRC🇨🇳 (which US🇺🇲 sanctioned it as "Red China) ... and today, US🇺🇲 has the cheek to deny that Taiwan is an integral part of China .... 废话!!
So sad for Europe, it's heart broken but definitely correct. People in EU should consider what this Singaporean ex-foreign minster said.
很有幸，发现这频道 ❤❤
What Singapore wants to see is no wars ,peace. Whether there is a US base in Singapore or not. While certain wars may benefit us, it is bad money/ benefits and I am sure we don't need it.
星親中國与美國，努力坚持為四元种族，提升国家的繁荣与進步，求生存的星加坡的地位，有远见的政治家，领导正確，誠实，公正，為民服务，献身精神的執政团队，都值得全世界人的尊重与羨佩😮。🇸🇬👍🙋🏻♂️🙋🙋♀️🙋🏻♂️。
学者无需负起责任，可以畅谈。
intra slavic conflict, my goodness, this gentleman is spot on!
As an Asian leading country, Singapore should stand on the right human side , knowingly US is a war hawk country ,joining it to carry out mission against GAZA 's supporters which has been doing rightfully human things in the red sea ,to force the genocide in GAZA.Contrary refuse to speak out & even aligned with US will be complicit,as Obama had said !"we all are complicit".China & Russia have taken a right stand :Talk & humanitarian support , strategic support .
As a Chinese saying, a far off relative is not as helpful as a neighbour. 远亲不如近邻. Thus, as Mr George Yeo said 60-40,55-45 etc is what Singapore way of balancing in international politics. Singapore is definitely not a Humpty Dumpty.
中國和美不可能開戰的(戰場在那裏)大家多慮了。還以為是清朝時代.用幾艘木船放幾粒炮就可以割香港。
双语失败的学都能写書法?你行吗?
杨荣文的第二语文是马来语。
他的母语是潮语
华语已是第四语言。
双眉紧锁那是他严肃对待国际課题.
我有看过杨的一些演说，我认为说他是以ABC为主的🇸🇬政客里极其罕见的这么一个🇨🇳通，甚至于绝大多数各地的华人知识分子，对于中国历史、文化、政治的了解程度都远不如他。
manjutiger 说得对极了我国政客都是像他这样
@@ManjuTiger马凯/Kishore 也不懂汉语，也是与杨这样的说法
新加坡是嘴上说不要，但是身体很诚实。看看新加坡武装部队都在哪些国家进行训练或者演习，去国外进行军事任务的时候都和哪些国家合作。这已经不单单只是让美军航母在新加坡停靠补给的事了。背后的含义对有心者来说早就心知肚明。也是因为这样，2016年新加坡的九辆武装军车Terrex在台湾军训过后，船运经过香港港口的时候被拦了下来。这是中国给新加坡的一个警告。
骑墙者最终会从墙上掉下来，。当它磨破蛋的时候
中國這個做法太可怕了霸道，還以為自己很厲害，讓全世界的人看到中國如何欺負小國。新加坡建國需要幫助的時候，中國在哪裡???，沒幫就算了，人家交什麼朋友也要管，太霸道了。
The last question George answered was deleted out leaving only 'His position has changed' refering 2 Xi position. Not an ethical thing to do in context of this discussion.
美国在新加坡沒军事基地..我们的基地每年都有各国的军觇和军人到访和举行演习其中包括了中国军觇和军人.
美国在新加坡的海军基地有助于维护该地区的和平。保护新加坡、台湾、日本、菲律宾、韩国等小国家是美国的责任。
你没听懂他在说什么，尤其是时代背景。
美国媒体说新加坡亲中, 香港说新亲美？ 正确答案是保护自己利益, 亲自己. 军事基地是在柔佛海陕, 看的懂吗？
SINGAPORE WILL ABSOLUTELY NOT TAKE SIDE....IN THIS CONTEST...AND SO WILL ASEAN😅😊
Why would a country depend solely on others? Everything is dispensable. You might be sacrificed once both superpower makes a pact, and one of the factors is getting rid of you as a sincere gesture since you can't contribute much benefit anyway.
Wiser move is to become a centre piece that connects both ends.
@@UOniLiveOnce what we don't see is behind the scene. Not so straight fw
Actually....When American ships call in Singapore...thè personnel are not allowed to be bunk.....They can only check in hotel as tourist...US army in Japan are not subjected to Japanese laws...but US army in Singapore is subjected to Singapore laws😅😊
These are the bright people that comes into politics in S’pore. Which is based on high qualifications & knowledge. They’re remunerated highly as well. But some Spore voters don’t s as appreciate the importance of such policies.
遗憾没有中文字幕。
有字幕，若無顯示，電腦端請點擊右下角字幕打開，手機端點右上角。
Who succeeded George? Does Lawrence have a good deputy who has a global view backed by years of experience and wisdom?
So true
They identified a plot of land to build a disneyland in Singapore but cancelled the plans after the micheal fay canning verdict in 1992. Eventually they chose to build it in Hong Kong.
Business
All along Singapore and Hong Kong was competing. On hindsight, they used Singapore as a bargaining chip leverage to ask for better deals from Hong Kong. They have always wanted Hong Kong and the China market.
What an exhibit of ignorance. Singapore has a US military base?
George Yeo is no longer neutral.
he hasn't been since a long time lol
Is he working for Huawei? I read from somewhere.
@@Buttercookies0 Yes, Huawei is China' largest data-collecting agency, when someone works for Huawei, he is pretty much recruited by the civil service system of PRC already, so to speak.
@@ManjuTiger No wonder. Before I know abt this, I have some reservations on some of his speeches and interviews.Now I understand where he is coming from.
Looks like quite a number of Singaporeans in the comments section here.
Singapore, as an open economy, and tiny nation, has many vulnerabilities. This is no surprise, and has been a basic consideration of the Government in the conduct of foreign and domestic policy. Singapore tries to be friends with everyone, even warring factions. The Government is ultra-cautious, often, going to extremes, in trying to maintain some semblance of balance and neutrality. A clear and jarring example is the recent Israeli-Gaza war. The Government in SG has made it clear that there'll be no discourse, no discussion in public fora on this matter, for fear that it will spark domestic animosties, especially among its Muslim population. One can also surmise that the Government wants to appear unconfrontational to Israel, and by extension, the US. This is pragamatic, but it also shows weakness in SG. Closing one's eye and covering one's ears, keeping one's mouth shut over a clear blatant genocide happening 'Live' daily, is a moral cop-out, even if self-presevation is the goal, and many Singaporeans will support a "Not my war" mindset.
Contrast this to the SG Government's quick condemnation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine on Feb 24th 2022, and subsequently, imposed sanctions on Russia (symbolic, but still). The Government made it clear, on multiple occassions, that it wasn't staking sides in the conflict, but took a principled stance based on respect of sovereignty of nation-states under the UN Charter. A righteous position under International Law, clearly. Now, on Israel's genocide in Gaza, and this has ICJ (Internation Court of Justice) ruling, Singapore refuses to take any position. Let me remind those who are oblivious, more than 30000 civillians, more than a 3rd of them children, have been killed by Israeli Defence Force in the 130+ days of the war. By ANY measure, this is clear and blatant ethnic-cleansing, and by UN definition, genocide. (Note: Using the Hamas attack on Oct 7th 2023 to explain/justify/rationalize Israel's war in Gaza, ignores the 16years that Israel has kept Gaza and its 2.3million people, in an open-air prison, for no crime other than being Palestinian).
Principles?
Let me make it clear to you. Singapore doesn’t stand on any side and only points to the rights side because we don’t want the public to stir up misunderstanding of hatred irregardless of Palestinian or the Jews as they are all innocent. Make it clear it is their government that cause this sad episode.
@@94876883 That is the most non-response response I've seen in a long while. You can actually lift what you wrote from my original comment. Congratulations, I guess.
He is lying, of course 😂
Are you trying to destroy the racial harmony in Singapore? Something we tried so hard to achieve and still working to perfect.
@@lazarusguan2388 it's 2024, not 1964, head in the sand approach may not be the best option. Not sure you know much about what's happening in Ukraine and Gaza. Racial harmony is precious, but it cannot be preserved by dumbing down realities. We're not North Korea (a closed hermit nation) or the USA (possibly the most propagandized country on Earth), if 🙈🙉🙊is how we handle controversial issues, we become ignorant and risk being swayed and manipulated by those who want to use SG for their selfish goals. I believe Govt is aware, which is why Sham came out and made the statement he did about Ukraine (which Sylvia Lim was unfortunate to question in Parliament).
Host you no need to dig hole for our ex-minster to jump he is smart enough.
Many mainland Chinese have a problem with the naval base in Singapore which many countries’ navies, including the US warships, can call on. The thing is, it was there since the 90s. Those days, China and USA were in their honeymoon and China didn’t make much of a noise about the base then. Singapore also had a different set of security considerations then. China warships can call on our base if they so wish and they have actually done so on a few occasions. Stop using the base as any suggestion of our geopolitical inclination. This Chinese moderator obviously tried too hard to be smart here and could only show his glib.
成日好多媒體問其他國家，一個中國攻打台灣，如何應對台海危機？不參與，就是最好的應對。
Not your call
在目前的以色列与哈马斯的斗争，一直以来都是哈马斯的不安分自己所造成的，我常常从新闻读到哈马斯以火箭弹发射至以色列的境内，导致损失，人命伤亡。也有一部分归咎于以色列的种族歧视心态。如今，以色列是一了百了的想根除哈马斯的势力。
我觉得巴勒斯坦和以色列的土地划分是非常的奇葩，如同阿美尼亚与阿赛拜江一样。都是在日日夜夜的纷争，且都是关于信奉伊斯兰教的人，其教系是没问题，因为教不是活人，不会去打战。
请看过去以色列难民进驻巴勒斯坦后一路到现在的变化。你对巴勒斯坦历史的认知只有三十几年。
@@Slimec1976 我没有对中区域的东西有太多了解，也不是关注那里的事情。且看日后的事情情况吧。谢谢您的答复。
There wasn't and isn't a US military base in Singapore. There is lots of misinformation out there and people didn't check facts and just repeat what others said.
LKY once said: keep your friends close but keep your enemies closer. I think this is how Singapore survives by not choosing a side in this geopolitics contest between superpowers.
sg today is far more under usa's thumb than LKY' time. there are many american agents in sg media and academia. sg might be less at risk of colour revolution compared to to hk in late 201* but it's not entirely free of that risk.
Singapore is not a third China despite the chinese forming the majority. SGP is in a bind because China insisted that their forefather is from China.
他這几年來都和中國有利益上的聯系，他也曾是軍中淮將但這都已成了過去，現在的擺動偏向中方這也不是什么驚奇的事，毕竟人是會隨着時間與自身利益而改變的。
人家都说过了，人家认为新加波会继续保持中立，保持中立就是亲共？你这逻辑真的神奇，李大师的弟子么？
我认为是两者结合的，既有商业利益上的牵扯，也有他自身情感和文化认同方面的真实表露。以前他作为政客，为了💰途、仕途，很多话是不敢放开讲的，而现在他什么都有了，万一出事家庭也有退路，所以敢于讲80%这样的实话。但我发现还有20%左右他是保留着不太敢讲的。
@@cloudwithwind574 中立？別說我這道地土生土長新加坡人不信，連我所認識的中馬在新工作者都對新加坡政府與高官不管是否還在職的中立地位嗤之以鼻，尤其是離任後的高官更是傾向於討好中共，你認為他此刻親美或中立對他自己往後的錢途還會有好處嗎？
正常，中国近些年一直参与开辟北冰洋航道，预留缅甸出海口，陆上还有中欧班列，贸易战如火如荼，疫情几年封控，对新加坡的国家定位来讲是很伤的。偏向亲中一些，是给新加坡留条后路，有这种危机感是政治家的基本素养。可惜，新加坡人的反应迟钝，倒是出乎我意料。
由此可知精英政治确实是必要的，换做台湾的民粹执政新加坡，根本掌握不了平衡，早就一头栽进去了。
多级世界会稳定些！！加油
失去杨，是新加坡的很大很大的损失。集选区是双刃剑。
On the surface 新加坡人講不偏。但係Israel的軍，部長係有分參觀兵營。
很多国家军人都有参观我们的兵营。我也参观过台湾，澳洲，韩国等军营，这不代表什么。
@@Slimec1976 你都講清楚，yes it means a lot. 人家李顯龍做總理前要去台灣。
学习他国的长处，增强自己的短处，星国才能有今日的伟大成就👍👏
中国也偏向俄罗斯，可以吗？
一个过气的政客😂
这个姓楊的人，在14年選舉中，被整個選区的选民抛弃kick off， 所以跑路，還在这里讲鬼話😂
你是新加坡人吗
我希望听到杨先生更多地谈论习近平所做的愚蠢之举。然而，我怀疑杨先生可能会因为害怕被禁止进入香港和中国而选择保持沉默。
此前任部长以败选不代表新加坡民意。
誰代表新加坡民意？李顯龍？你？
民主成為笑話的年代，人人都聲稱自己就代表民意。
怪不得民主死得快，
@@WG1AHK 确实不能代表🇸🇬。。新加坡大部分华裔是🍌，中文都看不懂，甚至听不懂、不会说。Yeo将军属于当地华裔里极为罕见的汉学通。
過氣的政客，過時的政見，私心算計的分析。
是的，他真的過氣，在這兒發噏風的，你告訴我，誰不是抬人牙慧，誰不是過氣，而咽不下氣。
RUclips号稱國際，不外如是。
我一直不看這些所謂評論，免得笑聲冧地球
真不相信这位新加坡前外长竟然不知道新加坡从独立建国至今都没有外国的军事基地。
新加坡欢迎友好国家过境停靠，新加坡会提供補给与后勤服务。
你是生活在平行宇宙么？
李顯龍自己說了。
難道，李也不知道？
@@WG1AHK 胡扯!
Without American, Japanese and European investments , is there still a Singapore ?!
Wake up
Why do you make such a comment? Sg trades with every country, if possible.
Without foreign investment there no New China 😊
What type of economic logic is this? If no country invest in Malaysia, will Malaysia survive in this modern world?
Even huge China need investors too.
HK CNN "China’s new premier, Li Qiang, has offered a hearty welcome to foreign companies in an effort to arrest a slump in business confidence that has exacerbated the country’s economic woes"
Which country need only micro but not macro econ? Even N korea need that too.
Will there be a Japan without America investment after it received two Atomic bombs. Can there be a South Korea without America's investment on war effort in Vietnam ? Singapore is the largest investor in Vietnam for many years. Now America is forcing many investors to quit China to the benefit of Vietnam. So with Singapore and American investments it created a mini boom for Vietnam. So can there be a Vietnam without Singapore and America's help. Even China is investing in Vietnam.
Excuse me! Do your research before you open your childish mouth! 你一定是被拒签好多次了！呵呵！
新加玻你之所以怕死，是因为没有活明白😅
SG 活得很明白：看看SG 国旗含《明》亮的月和乳《白》配合！你被拒签几次了？呵呵
人讲🐦话称之为🐦人!🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🤣🤣🤣🤣
你是哪国人，能活得明白？？
马六甲海峡很快被废，知冇？
You must be anti Singapore!!
你慢慢等,等你有這本事才來,等多几辈子也不要放弃,知冇？
1）新加坡港口收入只占总收入的不到5%；
2）无论是铁路运输或克拉地峡，由于海峡狭窄，充其量只能满足小型中国货轮；
3）以前倡议开凿克拉地峡是提前预防美国掐脖子；
i)现在的东风快递已经消除这个担忧;
ii)现在向俄罗斯购买原油可以从内陆管道输往中国；
4）即使开凿克拉地峡，美国还是会，
i)以航海自由为由，出现在克拉地峡。届时，这个比马六甲和新加坡海峡还狭窄的运河更容易发生冲突；
5)泰国政权更迭可能使计划生变；
i)换了亲美的政权对中国更加不利；
6）减少中国货轮可以被其他国家取代。毕竟，新加坡海峡目前已过于拥挤；货轮得在港口外排队等通知才能入港上卸货。
7）其他如效率问题，泰国境内分离主义等，别人已经说到烂了，这里不必再多说什么。
我注意到香港媒体喜欢样样拿香港与新加坡做对比。新加坡的发展从来不是以香港做假想敌；新加坡媒体也从来不阴阳怪气的看待香港的发展。新加坡只是在做对自己的国民对的事。
爱中国为何又是英文名字 Joseph。又是用100%made in西方美國貨youtube平台。你該用的是CN平台才對。
一個被自己選區的人民遺棄的過氣失敗者，大家自己選擇要不要去認真聽取其見解！
哈哈哈…失败？……他活得比你想象中的好几倍呢！😂😂😂
@@yeochenyi1388 他是个普通人，不是新加坡官员。他说的只能代表他自己的观点而已。
@@Buttercookies0哈哈哈……然后呢？😄
@@yeochenyi1388 知道就好。没别的。
@@Buttercookies0有一丁点好奇，我在这有说了什么才会让你留言呢？没恶意，纯粹好奇问问。
所以新加披没有远见，他忘记他离中国更近，只是经济亲中是不够的
经济已经被连累得不够惨吗？🤣🤣
你多親中，西方名字的miller simon? 印度不更近？他们有多亲中 ？
欧州和英国是亲中的？欧州经济很好？
日本和韩国是亲中的？日本韩国经济很好？
你估人人都懂英文？给谁看，给谁听？
有字幕，很多人看。
学呀
最好全世界都配合你讲广东话。😂😂😂
有字幕好嘛，而且英文就是國際語言你也不能否認。
很一般的見解，難怪他已脫離新加坡政壇，不能再擔任要職。👎
真實，都是一般的。
你有出塵的見解嗎？
我得同意，楊是很一般。
但歐美的沒比他更平實。
非常支持以色列🇮🇱军事行动，以事论事，以色列🇮🇱军事行动是被逼出来的，不强加反击，以色列🇮🇱没有立身之处！
你喜欢很多中东人的血，越多越好！
希望他们的灵魂与你长在！永远在你的梦中。
@@kapogin9360以事论事，不分种族 ！
濫殺無辜,必有報應!!!
@@曾毓承 以色列🇮🇱不军事行动，难道由哈马斯歼灭吗？弄清楚是谁惹的祸端？
Shameful gerorge yeo. Back to your master xi SB
他添中共！
听说他是华为的顾问。不知道是不是真的。
他可算是過氣的政客了, 離開新加坡後, 幾十年來都生活在香港和中國那種地方, 早就被薰染了, 如果不入鄉同流能在那邊生存那麼久嗎？
在🇸🇬从军过的人都知道，不会演戏的人攀不了高位的，我记得他才30多岁就攀到“将级”军衔，可想而知其wayang功底之深。
过气的🇸🇬政客… 又不作功课…
🇸🇬双语的失败… 很作… 喜欢擺出
一副智者般的傻劲… 双眉深锁…
好好说话真的有这么难吗 🤷🏼♂️ 🥴
看来他说了你不想听的话😂
🙅♂️ 是根本就不想听他说话… 内容乏味… 重复… 老提“过气” … 又不是有什么好成绩… 还加演成很忧郁哭丧的表情…🤮
当你讨厌的人唱歌… 你听吗😴
@@bhng000 你观点新颖，说来听听
谢谢 🙏 … 只能意会难以言传…
缺“真”… 浓妆是掩饰不了皱纹… 世风日下像这类蹭饭的太多了啦… 有些还缺“德”呢 🥴
@@bhng000 噗，人家一个与全世界领导人打过交道的，搞的好像你比人家厉害似的，别逗了行不