the youtube algorithm legit gave me a heart attack a couple of years ago. let me explain, when I'm awake and bored i like listening to creepy pastas or watching horror movies. I'm a huge horror fan but when I'm ready to go to sleep i like listening to soothing dream scape tunes like astral projection type tunes. one night i went to bed listening to sleep music on my pc from youtube, the sleep was going good then it turned into a straight night terror the likes i never had before in my life soi woke up about 5ish hours into my sleep with my chest having a pain i could only describe as if i hot shocked in the chest, it was hard to breath and my chest felt tight as hell like it had a refrigerator on it. it took me some time for all the symptoms and pain to subside, when it did i noticed for some random reason the play list of sleep music i fell asleep listening to switched creepy pastas, so you don't make the same mistake i made whatever you do don't fall asleep with youtube still playing because the stuff you fall asleep listening to may not be what you wake up listening to
Sorry with the voice like that I can’t watch. What if you sped the video up instead, so then we could just half speed the vid? Would that get around DMCA issues?
RUclips has basically been trying to have their cake and eat it too with 230 I think the earliest I remember people talking about it was around 2015-ish with Steven Crowder and the Quartering
This is old; for those who want the results: the supreme court declined to comment or rule on this back in may of last year, citing their was no significant evidence of saying whether or not its the machine or the user actively looking for it.
If the algorithm was neutral and suggested videos based on what someone has search for and subscribed to that would be fine. But as soon as google starts shadow banning political voices or negeative news stories, while also promoting their morals, politics etc. they are acting as a publisher and should not be protected, and we all know they do it all the time. Its time we get a neutral place for free speech. If google wants to not allow people they dont like to upload, fine, do that, at least its in the open.
good point and just to add we can never really trust a provider with an ability to recommend/ suggest to be completely neutral unless there was accessible proof of it being so. That would take a history tracker specified for that itself and it (to me) seems almost impossible to do because of the amount of users, with and without profiles.
I fr can’t watch this, constantly pausing and unpausing, speeding up and slowing down. Like sure try to be transformative but not at the cost of the actual content
The law blows people away sometimes. Letter vs spirit. Letter wise. Just 2 words. ANY ACTION. or taking one from this. ANY. Including.... ANYTHING, including the use of Algorithmic Content Moderation, it means if the moderation gets it wrong they are also not held legally accountable. If RUclips employed pink elephants to help with content moderation they still wouldn't be legally accountable for anything because of the word ANYTHING. The law takes the dictionary definition of words into consideration right? I've found the newspaper journalist argument flawed in logic. It would more be trying to hold news papers accountable for people that put personal ads in them, an encounter ends up in a murder and the newspaper getting held legally liable for it. Butterfly effect slippery slope. "Good Samaritan Provision: Section 230(c)(2) protects platforms from liability for any actions taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or users consider objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected." - Not illegal for platforms to censor things as they see fit. At the same time, legally, no one has to moderate shit as it stands - "No Legal Requirement to Moderate: Platforms are not legally required to moderate content to maintain their Section 230 protections. They can choose the level and type of moderation they wish to apply." The law is fine; also for all the pragmatic reasons everyone with an ounce of foresight and logic in their head can see, ie it cannot be changed without major net negative repercussions. Some say "repeal" / "remove" 230. Ok then, with what? You need this shit to be pretty neutral to be effective and I hear no well thought out, proactive and long term ideas and from any of the critics. It's these that are the points of contention - "Discussion on Moderation Policies Transparency and Consistency: One of the major criticisms of platform moderation is the lack of transparency and consistency. Users often call for clearer guidelines and more predictable enforcement. Debate on Scope: There is ongoing debate about the appropriate scope of moderation. Some argue for more stringent moderation to prevent harm, while others advocate for minimal intervention to maximize free speech." Nothing will consistently change for one "side" or another. Source: the entirety of human history.
literally what are any of the comments about? there's no audio skipping and the pitch sounds fine, and what's with all the comments about the algorithm? am i insane? i feel like all the people commenting are not watching the same video that i am.
I'm not that bothered about him re-uploading it's the fact the channel is getting ads hopefully the owner of the channel isn't getting paid for uploading other people's content
If you figure out how your settings made you a serprano please let me know what they are. I am curious and have idea for how to utilize this alteration... none of the ideas are good, but all of them are appropriate. 🙃
So the channel doesn't get a copyright strike...I'm getting ads as well hopefully whoever owns this channel isn't getting paid for 're-uploading other people content.
Bro you literally have one simple job and that’s to rip clips from his stream and post them and you can’t even figure out correct audio. Either you are just very bad at what you do or you purposely change the audio to prevent take downs 😭 nobody gonna watch Ts and give you free money for doing the worst possible job
Also you couldn’t even take the time to get the videos yourself. These are all stolen from other ones. Converted your german money farm channel to a half assed one great job
Bro puberty left the chat
Why chipmunkup voices? isnt this already transformative/reactive enough to not get hit with anything?
it's sped up
I'm sorry, did I miss some Charlie lore with his voice? Are you feeling alright Charlie? Super important story though.
they changed the video around to avoid copy right / dmca stuff /flags
so the audio may sound off, video may be reversed/ etc
Its that why it constantly pauses/ cuts out. Can't listen to it. Too infuriating.
@@Cyber_Official@dumbass police
The audio skipping is driving me crazy bruh 😂
Audio is fucked up in this one.
Glad I wasn’t the only one that thought something was weird lol
It's so he doesn't get copyright/dmca strike
@@A.Mack1o2 He has done several of these without this issue. So just caught me off guard.
the youtube algorithm legit gave me a heart attack a couple of years ago. let me explain, when I'm awake and bored i like listening to creepy pastas or watching horror movies. I'm a huge horror fan but when I'm ready to go to sleep i like listening to soothing dream scape tunes like astral projection type tunes. one night i went to bed listening to sleep music on my pc from youtube, the sleep was going good then it turned into a straight night terror the likes i never had before in my life soi woke up about 5ish hours into my sleep with my chest having a pain i could only describe as if i hot shocked in the chest, it was hard to breath and my chest felt tight as hell like it had a refrigerator on it. it took me some time for all the symptoms and pain to subside, when it did i noticed for some random reason the play list of sleep music i fell asleep listening to switched creepy pastas, so you don't make the same mistake i made whatever you do don't fall asleep with youtube still playing because the stuff you fall asleep listening to may not be what you wake up listening to
So sounds like it’s the fault of you leaving RUclips on while sleeping, more than the algorithm that you already understood very well how it worked.
Sorry with the voice like that I can’t watch. What if you sped the video up instead, so then we could just half speed the vid? Would that get around DMCA issues?
RUclips has basically been trying to have their cake and eat it too with 230
I think the earliest I remember people talking about it was around 2015-ish with Steven Crowder and the Quartering
This is old; for those who want the results: the supreme court declined to comment or rule on this back in may of last year, citing their was no significant evidence of saying whether or not its the machine or the user actively looking for it.
Sorry Mister Critical, I'm gonna have to skip this class today, I think my ears are popping and it's driving me nuts.
If the algorithm was neutral and suggested videos based on what someone has search for and subscribed to that would be fine.
But as soon as google starts shadow banning political voices or negeative news stories, while also promoting their morals, politics etc. they are acting as a publisher and should not be protected, and we all know they do it all the time. Its time we get a neutral place for free speech.
If google wants to not allow people they dont like to upload, fine, do that, at least its in the open.
good point and just to add we can never really trust a provider with an ability to recommend/ suggest to be completely neutral unless there was accessible proof of it being so. That would take a history tracker specified for that itself and it (to me) seems almost impossible to do because of the amount of users, with and without profiles.
Audio sounds so weird
Ya I can say from exp that the algorithm is wak ... I have had to fully delete a acnt because it won't stop recommending awful things
I fr can’t watch this, constantly pausing and unpausing, speeding up and slowing down. Like sure try to be transformative but not at the cost of the actual content
The law blows people away sometimes. Letter vs spirit.
Letter wise. Just 2 words.
ANY ACTION.
or taking one from this.
ANY.
Including.... ANYTHING, including the use of Algorithmic Content Moderation, it means if the moderation gets it wrong they are also not held legally accountable. If RUclips employed pink elephants to help with content moderation they still wouldn't be legally accountable for anything because of the word ANYTHING.
The law takes the dictionary definition of words into consideration right?
I've found the newspaper journalist argument flawed in logic. It would more be trying to hold news papers accountable for people that put personal ads in them, an encounter ends up in a murder and the newspaper getting held legally liable for it.
Butterfly effect slippery slope.
"Good Samaritan Provision: Section 230(c)(2) protects platforms from liability for any actions taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or users consider objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected." - Not illegal for platforms to censor things as they see fit.
At the same time, legally, no one has to moderate shit as it stands -
"No Legal Requirement to Moderate: Platforms are not legally required to moderate content to maintain their Section 230 protections. They can choose the level and type of moderation they wish to apply."
The law is fine; also for all the pragmatic reasons everyone with an ounce of foresight and logic in their head can see, ie it cannot be changed without major net negative repercussions. Some say "repeal" / "remove" 230. Ok then, with what? You need this shit to be pretty neutral to be effective and I hear no well thought out, proactive and long term ideas and from any of the critics.
It's these that are the points of contention -
"Discussion on Moderation Policies
Transparency and Consistency: One of the major criticisms of platform moderation is the lack of transparency and consistency. Users often call for clearer guidelines and more predictable enforcement.
Debate on Scope: There is ongoing debate about the appropriate scope of moderation. Some argue for more stringent moderation to prevent harm, while others advocate for minimal intervention to maximize free speech."
Nothing will consistently change for one "side" or another. Source: the entirety of human history.
literally what are any of the comments about? there's no audio skipping and the pitch sounds fine, and what's with all the comments about the algorithm? am i insane? i feel like all the people commenting are not watching the same video that i am.
This channel reuploading old vods and attempting to monetize by changing the pitch, cutting out, and swapping the video? Yikes.
I'm not that bothered about him re-uploading it's the fact the channel is getting ads hopefully the owner of the channel isn't getting paid for uploading other people's content
If you figure out how your settings made you a serprano please let me know what they are. I am curious and have idea for how to utilize this alteration... none of the ideas are good, but all of them are appropriate. 🙃
The word you are looking for is 'curating'.
The platform is curating the content for you ;)
Semen cost a pretty pennie they say
Helium
are they sped up? thats weird
So the channel doesn't get a copyright strike...I'm getting ads as well hopefully whoever owns this channel isn't getting paid for 're-uploading other people content.
Yo Charlie what the news today
Bro you literally have one simple job and that’s to rip clips from his stream and post them and you can’t even figure out correct audio.
Either you are just very bad at what you do or you purposely change the audio to prevent take downs 😭 nobody gonna watch Ts and give you free money for doing the worst possible job
Also you couldn’t even take the time to get the videos yourself. These are all stolen from other ones. Converted your german money farm channel to a half assed one great job