I've gone from the JV-1080/XP-50 to a sound source that is “very normal and can do anything”. Compared to the previous models, the JV-1080/XP-50 certainly feels more mature. The keyboard was not semi-weighted, and compared to the later XP-80, the machine looked mediocre in terms of playability and visibility, and I agree with you. However, this machine was certainly a turning point for Roland synthesizers in terms of both software and hardware, and I think it is an important machine in the history of Roland. Well, the XP-80 (as long as the keys are in working order!) I like the XP-80 better, though! Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
you gave a rest to my soul
WOW, this keyboard sounds amazing!
what song were you playing in 6:01? Your piano improvisation is beautiful
All of the phrases were improvised by me and played on the spot from tones that sounded right. Thank you.
I had one of them in 96 , awful thing
why are you hating on keyboards?
@@g-starthefirst I’m not , I just don’t like the Xp 50
I've gone from the JV-1080/XP-50 to a sound source that is “very normal and can do anything”. Compared to the previous models, the JV-1080/XP-50 certainly feels more mature. The keyboard was not semi-weighted, and compared to the later XP-80, the machine looked mediocre in terms of playability and visibility, and I agree with you. However, this machine was certainly a turning point for Roland synthesizers in terms of both software and hardware, and I think it is an important machine in the history of Roland. Well, the XP-80 (as long as the keys are in working order!) I like the XP-80 better, though!
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)