❗ ☝❗ CORRECTION ❗👇❗ At the time 5:50 I'm talking about the swingweight I measured. The number is wrong (I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet) - it's from the version Blade 100 V9. For this Blade 98 16x19 V9 I measured 💪326 SW, which goes perfectly with the specs. Sorry for my mistake! 🖐
I resisted getting a blade for years because it’s just too mainstream for me. Now I have two blade 98 v9’s because it was just so fun and instructive to play with. Hitting the sweet spot makes me happy
Exactly that's why I'm not a big fan of Wilson rackets in general. They are everywhere. But in case like this, when the racket is so good, it's a joy to hit with the best one even if it is mainstream.
I m about to be the same.. I ve been using the pro staff the past 6 months. Love everything except for the serve. It's so unforgiving on the serve. Hoping this blade is good on serve and still feels good on grounds strokes.
@@tomk5238 The Blade 18x20 is excellent on serve. The 16x19 version is not that good, it's ok. But it's probably the only area where the Blade 16x19 struggles a little bit let's say.
@@CzechTennisGuy why is 18x20 better? In my experience I m not good enough for a 18x20. The main reason I want to change from pro staff is that I have found every other racquet I can hit 100mph. With the pro staff I m 10-15mph less. Everything else I like. So I m looking for something that has the same ground stroke but just easier to hit power and sweet spot on the serve.
I have to agree, flat out fantastic racquet. My first hit I had mixed feelings because I didn’t have my normal strings in there but once I cut those out and put my normal setup on the demo I fell in love. No complaints tbh. Best Blade right up there with V5. It is ripe for customization if that’s what you’re into but stock it is amazing/solid as well. 5.5+ level. The V8 was very good but I thought it was a little too flexy at times. This one gave not a stiffer feel but crisper. Highly recommend people give it a shot. I’m stuck between this and the Blade Pro. The V9 Blade is the most complete racquet out there right now and I’ve tried them all.
This is very pleasing as I just happened to buy this today! All I had was some shadow swings in the shop and it felt amazing feel but when I got to the court I didn’t try it yet as I was a bit nervous to put down my pro staff six one 90! Now I’m looking forward to trying it out thanks 🙏
Only thing that puts me off getting this is the Wilson quality control - the swing weight, balance varies a lot from frame to frame. To get a racquet probably need to get the shop to check the spec first and match if getting more than one. I sometimes play with a Wilson prostaff K factor 90 that's 385g as well, rallies are ok but it's tough playing sets with it given how heavy it is. Sometimes I feel a lighter racquet with head light balance would be better as I could get more racquet head speed instead of the plow. How does the blade compare with the standard version of Prostaff?
Hi! I used all versions to Blade 98, incluyed H22 (standard and plus version). For me the best string is the ALU Rough, amazing!!! 23-22kg in CLAY!! enjoy the Manuuuubrability😂. greetings from Barcelona
It's all Blade V9 who wins. Especially the version 100 has tremendous spin potential and great amount of free power with overall good control and precision.
I am looking for a new racquet and i am probably going with the v9 blade! just dont know which one... should i get the 100L and customize it to a decent spec? i would choose this for the head size or should i go with the 98 16x19? thx for any help
It depends on how you can play. The 100 will be great for most intermediate players. It's a lot more forgiving comapred to the 98 versions. The 100L for lower intermediate, women and juniors. The 98 versions for upper intermediate and advanced.
Thank you - your videos are brilliant and super informative. I'm interested to understand how you would compare the blades (18x20 + 16x19)to the prostaff 97 v14. I m demoing both the Blade v9 18x20 and the Prostaff at the moment and strangely feel that the blade feels more classic despite specs. I m moving from a prestige flexpoint mp 18x20 so that might be why? The Pro Staff feels like it is doing more to the ball vs what you are doing to the ball. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
My personal observation is that you have to let go the Pro Staff rackets to do the job instead of the Blades, where you kind of play more with the racket. So if you don't have the great fluid technique for the PS, just get the Blade where you can use more power of your arm and stay in touch with the frame. I hope you get this idea.
I play with blade pro, before that blade always 18x20. Recently used a friends Artengo Tour. Artengo is not as good for slice, or power, but for half the price, very good racquet
@@CzechTennisGuy thanks for your answer ! I noticed that you have a quite classic technique on both FH and BH and I heard some people say that the blade was not really designed for extreme grips (strong semi-western / western). Could it be correct ?
Hey @Tennis Guy just wondering if they extended the grip length? Because the previous v8 the grip handle was short so my 2hb (top hand) was holding on the yoke
hey great video for this new blade can you compare the percept 100,speed mp and pure aero 100? what I will get and lose trying the first two? I'm currently using the Babolat
Percept 100 - more feel and more control. Less spin potential and less free power. Speed MP - great control and very stable performance on all shots, mostly for flatter hitters. Very good allround racket.
The magnets are there just as a weight - instead of lead tape. Each of the magnets is 10g so imagine how many lead tapes wou would have to put on the frame (throat section) to gain 20g of weight in total. Se he took magnets instead. And magicaly this works well.
Is this a racquet for an 3.0 - 3.5 USTA? I'm amateur player that has a bit of trouble with footwork but is working to improve? I currently have an Ezone100 but balls are going out a lot. HELP pls.
What do you think is the best racquet for my player profile? Ezone is just too powerful and muted. Not sure if the problem is me or the raquet. Im a very tall person 190cm. with aggressive delpotro forehand. @@CzechTennisGuy
I love this channel!!! I want to ask you a very good question, for an aggressive baseline player, which of the two rackets do you recommend? wilson blade 98 16x19 v9? or babolat pure strike 98 16x19 2024?
How is it for flat hitting compared to the speed mp? Is the 18x20 more difficult to use (less manoeuvrable) than a speed pro 2022, I really liked the 2022 speed pro but it was too slow for my game.
The Blade 98 18x20 feels faster thanks to the 20.6 mm beam. But it's a beefy racket so it takes some effort to get the racket moving. But I think in the SW point of view the Blade 98 18x20 is very similar to Head Speed Pro so if you were able to play with the Speed Pro, you will master the Blade, too.
I have been using the Luxilon Alu Power 1.25 in grey, according to one of your reviews do you think the lime colour plays better with the Wilson Blade 98? I notice that this V9 version lifts the ball a lot and has a lot of flight, I think I liked the V 77 version better, which was very stable and had a lower launch angle, what do you think of this? Thank you very much for your great help to Tennis, my friend!!!!
I'm the same opinion. Since the version 7, which was one of the most demanding Blades out there, the V8 and V9 have bigger sweetspot, bigger spin potential and they produce more free power. And that's why the ball sometimes fly too much, too high, without control. I think with the next Blade V10, they will have to come little bit back to more control, more feel for the flatter shots etc. Regarding the string - some say that the colour has a big impact on how the string plays. But I didn't observe that because I didn't test strings with different colours. So it's up to you to try them. Thank you for your support as always 🙌
Hey, How does the Blade compare to the Speed pro 2024? I was looking to buy the Speed pro but the Blade also seems interesting, what do you think from your testing?
@CzechTennisGuy interesting, thanks for the reply. I think I will go with the Speed Pro though because I played with a Blade 98 18x20 and I feel I need a bit bigger headsize and I changed my playstyle to a more defensive counterpunching style and I think that the speed would help me more in that regard. And also I want a 18x20 for the control because I play with a full swing and with 16x19 I feel that the ball flies out more often.
@CzechTennisGuy also I am a big guy, hitting the gym 5 times a week, so the weight should not be an issue, thanks a lot for yohr feedback, I really enjoy your channel, you are one of the most honest people when you do reviews, others just praise all the time everything
I think the 100L can be an excellent option for a lower intermediate player. I tested the 100UL version of the Blade v8 and I was surprised how good it was. Light, with excellent manooovrlbity, but also great spin and feel. Stable enough for most basic shots, really nice easy hitting high performance frame.
Which is better between v9 blade 16/19 or the head boom pro 16/19, as you seem to like the boom pro a lot Also how do these compare to the pro staff 97 315 grams and the pure aero 98
So the Blade V9 16x19 is in my opinion the best 98 on the market in 2024. Boom Pro 16x19 is for more fun and casula game. Blade is definitely more competitive and delicate in every aspect. Pro Staff 97 is more precise, but it lacks the spin potential and free power of the Blade. The Pure Aero 98 is more powerful and less feel oriented. So the Blade is winning it in this comparison at least for my taste.
It has more free power, feels more stable with better overall feel. Spin is also very good. Almost in all aspects it feels like more all-round balanced racket.
i am also playing with RF97A which i absolutely love. I was trying to find smth similar on the market but in a lighter package but it feels impossible. Has your hitting partner found smth similar to his RF97A?
No, he is a fan of his racket and he really doesn't take any interest in other rackets too much. I would say Blade is pretty different from Pro Staff. The Blade Pro shares little bit more similarities thanks to the boxed beam.
Thanks for the quick review. I am with you on the new blade v9 16x19, great update! No offense but I think your friend shouldnt play with this racket, I dont think footwork, technique etc matches a racket that heavy.
You are right. The problem is that my friend works with 3kg hammers all day long, he makes wooden roofs for hauses and he is super strong. So when he grabs a lighter racket, he has absolutely no feel for the frame because he doesn't feel it in his hand. 💪 It's crazy how a physical job can have such a huge impact on the feel of a racket.
I will for sure but now I don't have much time to edit it. It's already done, but it needs editing and that's what takes the most time. I'm going on a ski vacation for couple fo days and next week I will receive new Head Booms V2 for a review, so it's uncertain when the review will be out. Sorry for the delay.
For me too heavy and less manooovrlble. Also the 18x20 pattern didn't suit my game. But interestingly I like the Wilson Blade Pro 18x20 more compared to the 16x19.
@@twenty2143 There shouldn't be a weight difference on the frame itself, but the 18x20 string pattern is denser = more string in the head = higher the SW and overall strung weight.
I dropped the V8 cause i thought it was not estable enough, and the sweetspot was not forgiving enough. Then i went to Radical mp 360+ Customized with 31.5cm Balance, and 330g total weight, i do like the stability and forgiveness the radical gave me, but i do miss the Blade maneuverability. I gave Ezone 98 a chance, too, but i do miss the control and maneuverability from the blade. The question is, does the V9 16x19 is stable as the Radicals are? And about the sweetspot is generous? I'm an 4.5+ player, wih an one handed backhand. Should i come back to the blades now? 😅 I've used the 2015 blade, the v6 v7 v8, i miss countervail stability, but i want a less stiff and more maneuverable Blade. Cya. Great videos, by the way. Congratz.
Thank you. I think the answer to your question is Blade V9. It has all the features you ask for. Easy to use, but powerful and stable at the same time. Great feel, great touch, superb manooovrlbity, big sweetspot, impressive top spin. It has all 99% of intermediate and advanced players need in todays modern game. Go for it. Just be sure you get the 98 16x19 version.
Tennis Guy! You got game, Bro!😀🎾Is there really a difference between the V8 and V9 Blades? Now, for this old 4.0 singles player, who needs racquet help on serve, etc. Should I go for the V9 16x19, or wait for the 100 Blade? Also, how does the V9 16x19 Blade match up with the Ezone 98? All the best, and have a great weekend! Ciao, John
Hey John! Great to see you and hear from you. Yes. Blades V8 were great, I really enjoyed them, too. But they were somehow specific in the flex, which was too low for my taste and the racket felt like a chewing gum in some situations. This V9 is complete - it's not stiff, it's just stable from the buttcap to the tip of the head. It reminds me the Percept, but it has more power and more spin potential. The feel is outstanding. I think the Ezone 98 is less control oriented with less precision and less spin potential. This 20,6 mm beam goes like a knife through a butter. It's fast, responsive, has great power and spin potential and it's super friendly to use. At least this is the one worth demoing at all costs. And then you will see for yourself. Enjoy the weekend John and let your tennis racket dream come true!
Blade v8 is not a blade to carry the blade heritage. V9 is back to its roots. V8 had inconsistent stringbed that could launch the ball and it couldn’t produce a heavy ball even after lead. V9 has top notch control….. a little bit more power and even more stable. Feel is less firm too. More wholesome in a way
@@TheodorosKolokotronis799 I think the Blade V9 is a combination of Blade V7 and Blade V8. The Blade V8 started the transformation to a more complete racket. I think it was a good first step. Not perfect, but very solid. I tested also the 100UL V8 and I was surprised how such a light (265g) frame can do some damage.
Recently I was reading about the rigidity of the Blade V8, V9 and Noir. On the TW forum they also say that the Noir version could also be a V9 in disguise, since it was launched close to V9. I intend to purchase a Noir V8. How did that feel on the court? Did you find it too rigid? Something around 63-65RA? Big hug
Interesting. The black paint somehow almost always makes anything more rigid. Maybe it's just a placebo effectm who knows. Actually I felt the Blade V9 exactly somwehere around 65 RA. Not super soft, not super stiff. Medium and quite juicy. Like a beef steak. ;-)
@@CzechTennisGuy alright friend, thanks! and taking into account that it is a little more rigid, which string do you recommend for it? Lynx Tour, Hyper G, Confidential or 4g? All 1.25
@@pedrocostajuniorr From these strings I like Lynx Tour. I don't like Hyper G - it plays well at the beginning but when it looses tension it's weird, too soft, like playing with a chewing gum. I didn't hit with Confidential or 4G.
Could this racquet just have been an enhanced base for the from the blade pro ? What could the next generation improve or include, that would make you say , there is something that could have been better in the v9 , which makes the v10 better ? Do you prefer the 16x19 based on a clay court game vs a hard court game . See AC tennis just yesterday on it and the 18x20 in comparisons to others . The blade pro and v5 apparently rated higher . You sound like a wilson convert . You may want to be their distributor .
You are clearly in the honeymoon phase. The low swing weight of 313 is horrible compared to tw. I agree that the blade (also the v8) is suited for all different play styles, but to me it was too muddy. Currently the best racket i have ever tried and still have is the angell react 96 16x19 which can used for every style as well. It's not a 98, but the sizes are overrated. I have some 95 rackets that are easier to use than some 100 rackets. Head shape and string pattern drilling have big impact and in many cases more than the size of the hoop
I made a mistake with the SW. I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet. I measured 326. The 313 number is for the version 100. I've put this note into the video description and also pinned this as a comment. I'm sorry for this mistake.
I made a mistake with the SW. I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet. I measured 326. The 313 number is for the version 100. I've put this note into the video description and also pinned this as a comment. I'm sorry for this mistake.
That's a question even a Tennis Guy has problem answering. I don't really know. But I bet that for todays modern tennis the Blade V9 is 100% a better racket.
@@DJScharlie Actually I still use it on my Artengo racket, but later it feels too thick to me. I will be 40 years old soon and I feel that my fingers and palm gets thicker. So the space in my palm is filled more with the muscles and skin. The fingers stay the same in lenght or they even get shorter. After some time my hand will get slimmer for sure when I start to loose muscles and my hand will shrink so I will need a thicker grip, maybe even size 4 like when I was 25-30 years old. But at this age I need more feel and that comes from a thinner grip.
@@DJScharlie The Blades are easier to use comapred to the Radicals. So if you want to have easier time on court but also with great performance, go for the new Blades.
@@HendriBrouwer well it does have a thicker beam and a higher swingweight. It feels clunkier through the air at times but it creates a much deadlier ball
Everything you say is true yhe best feeling racket easy comfy but the power is lacking and i s difficult to fix at lest on the V8 for becase it was so mushy and absorbing .I hope yhis one responds to lead 3&9 better
@Batwam0 4g Led @ 3&9 total plus 4g blue tac in trap door, and string with gut poly but is absorbing heavy balls an let me down on some return It may be different with v9
You mention that you find the new Blade 98 16x19 overall better than the Percept 97. Is it because of the extra free power or other major differences? And could the ALU Power be the main reason for this? A detailed comparison between these 2 rackets would be awesome as they are both targeting the same audience!
It's definitely the free power and also the spin potential and bigger sweetspot. You need to get used to the Percept 97 and that's what most people don't like to do - they want to buy a tennis racket that works for them right from the start. And the Blade is that racket. The Percept is specific with the Isometric headshape and a quite low powered frame. I would say you have to be a better player to get the most of the Percept 97. The ALU Power can definitely be a big part of the overall success of this racket. Strings are 50% of the performance of a tennis racket. But I would not just "blaim" the strings. I tested the Percept with Yonex PolyTour REV recommended string so both of the rackets were played with the best possible setup recommended by the manufacturer.
Tennis Guy: Have you hit with the Blade v9 100? The v9 will come to the states in mid- March. Should I wait for the V9, or get the v8, which is on discount at TW? I will eventually get the v 9 98 16x 19… I string all of my rackets with Champions Choice hybrid: natural gut in mains( 55 or 53) , ALU Power rough in cross ( 52 or 50).. what do you think? Best, John🎾🎾🎾🎾
That's a good idea to try the V8 98 16x19 for a discount, John. I liked the V8, too. It's more flexible. Champions choice hybrid is hard to beat, so go for it. Never played with ALU Rough so I can't tell the difference. Cheers ✌
I prefer this Blade. Shift 99 is in some situations too powerful and unpredictable. Also Shift wears strings faster, loss of tension is more significant and that leads to loss of control.
I think the Pure Drive 98 is the best 98 square inch racket I have ever played with. Blade lacks the punch that Pure Drive 98 provides on the ground strokes. Why don't you try out the new Pure Drive 98 to find out for yourself?
The 18x20 is way better. It has more stability, control and same power due to higher SW. Spin is decent and depends more on your technique... The 16x19 feels like u sacrifice a lot for a little more spin and launch angle ,)
I can feel that this can be true. But I really need that extra power and spin, being a light guy. But if someone is a strong tournament player, the 18x20 can be the perfect choice for sure.
@@CzechTennisGuy Both frames have a demanding nature, in terms of power they are not very different. The 18x20 gets the power from its higher SW, the 16x19 from a more powerful pattern. The 16x19 only has that little more spin and reactive stringbed but is worse anywhere else.... for most not worth the trade off!!
@@hybrid11theory75 I did not test the 18x20 version so I can't tell the difference. In general 18x20 patterns are more muted and "lazy" then 16x19, so that's why the 16x19 is almost always more popular among amateur players.
@@CzechTennisGuy You really have totry the 18x20. As the other commenter said, it’s so superior to the 16x19. Way more stable and you can get more power and spin out of it just because you know exactly how much power to put into the racket
@@thelongtrombone3528 I can see that. But I usually don't like 18x20 patterns because they are too stiff and muted. And I almost never get the 18x20 versions for a review so I can't test this one now. Maybe later at some point but I don't think this will happen. Sorry.
Hey Tennis Guy, is there something wrong with this upload? The video doesn't appear under my subscriptions, I can only find it when I click directly on your channel. The videos before appear under my subscriptions.
That's true. But at the same time the V8 is not so complete in terms of stability. It's more precise and feel oriented, but with less free power and lower spin potential.
Yes I did and It was a very different experience. Feels more like a Pro Staff + Ultra hybrid. Quite heavy for every day use. Pro stock feel is unique, very connected, compact, solid feel. But it was too low powered for my taste, quite small sweet spot because it is a 97 in2 head size and felt too heavy for my game.
@@CzechTennisGuy Interesting . I ordered one last night. I play with a Gravity Pro but also have a Blade 98 18x20 in my bag. I like the Blade but hit too flat with it. Ive used the 16x19 V8 previously but found it too light, so I'm hoping the Pro will fit the bill
Zdenek my sparing partner from the video plays one handed backhand. He tried the racket too and he liked it. But for him it's too light. He plays with the customized Pro Staff RF97 strung at 384 g. Just insane.
Zdenek my sparing partner from the video plays one handed backhand. He tried the racket too and he liked it. But for him it's too light. He plays with the customized Pro Staff RF97 strung at 384 g. Just insane.
The 18x20 is more difficult to swing with. I really felt the higher swingweight, which I measured 333. I like the stringbed though, it makes the shots more surgical and the punch from the racket is greater when you hit it. I felt the benefit of the 18x20 on the serve, too. It's because the higher swingweight hits the static ball on serve with more power and plowthrough. Great stick, too, but for me too demanding.
If you can generate your own power then it’s not problem… just demo it and try it… best racket I’ve ever bought and hated Wilson rackets before but this has changed the game
Cut the string and try another string to find out if you have the best string racquet combo or not. Maybe it will feel even better with your favorite string, if that's possible?
Ahoj, co se týče kontroly a přesnosti, tak v tom je jednoznačně lepší verze 98 16x19. Od verze 100 to zase více letí zadarmo, člověk se tolik nenadře a má výraznější spinový potenciál (široká hlava rakety). Stovková verze má taky mnohem větší sweetspot a odpouští nečisté zásahy. Je to hodně pohodová raketa, přitom dost výkonná na to, aby uspokojila i náročnější tenisty. Stabilní a komfortní jsou obě verze podobně. Zásadní je tedy švihová hmotnost - u verze 100 jsem naměřil jen 313 a u verze 98 16x19 326. To už je výrazný skok nahoru. Záleží tedy jak moc dobře hraješ a jakou máš celkovou zkušenost s tenisem. Pro slušné turnajové a vynikající klubové hráče co mají tenis jako hlavní sport a mají chuť se pořád zlepšovat bude lepší verze 98. Pro nadšené amatéry, co nejezdí po turnajích a chodí si zahrát dvakrát týdně bude bohatě stačit verze 100. Ono takhle rozhodovat naslepo je hrozně těžký. Musel bych vidět jak hraješ. Za mě tedy bohatě bude stačit verze 100 naprosté většině tenistů. Někdo možná ocení ještě lehčí model 100L nebo 100UL. Záleží na výkonnosti.
Díky moc za cenné informace. S 98 ale verzi V8 jsem rok hrál a je fakt dobrá akorát já jsem spíš na agresivnější styl hry a nevím jestli by ta 100 v9 nebyla pro můj styl lepší ale zase nechci přijít o tu odezvu do ruky kterou jsem měl s tou 98. Tak uvidím 😊 Fandím ti a přeju ať se ti daří.
@@LukasPolak-j3e Je pravda, že hraní s verzí 100 je zkrátka takové bezstarostné. Prostě tu raketu chňapneš do ruky a jdeš do toho mlátit hlava nehlava beze strachu, že by ti neodpustila pár nečistých zásahů. Někdy můžeš mít horší den a ty 98 už to dají znát. Dokonce bych neměl problém mít v bagu verzi 100 jako záložní raketu pro horší dny. To prohození je jednoduché, člověk si na nic nezvyká, ba naopak se mu uleví. Také držím palce ať se daří a díky moc za podporu z Čech ✌
From other reviews V9 is more beefy (SW is increased) than V8, less maneuvrable and not overall better. Your review seems like comparing blade 280grams or Blade 300grams with soft string like Yonex PTP...such setup would have the similar effect...
There is something strange about this v9 racquet… I prefer the plush feel of the v7 and its great stability, the v9 version sometimes throws a very long and high ball… it is like some technology that makes it easier to play with. The v7 version literally crushes the ball and has unmatched precision, I am sorry to say that for me the best racquet of the blade series is the V7
I agree. That's the one thing that I would complain about the V9. The launch angle is very high and sometimes I just lost control of the ball without really knowing the reason behind it. I'm saying that too, that the V7 was one of the most solid Blades ever made. Very good plowthrough and pop. Flet hevier and more demanidng, though. Since V8, the Blades become easier and easier to play with for the widest audience possible.
This V9 would have to be a gargantuan step forward over the V7 and V8, both of which were two of most unpleasant racquets I've ever had the misfortune to play with; they're dead like a plank of wood. V9 is much nicer looking though.
@@bushmenaa Now I play with grip size 3 + 1 overgrip 0.4 mm. But I will switch 1 size down in the future, because I want more feel. And I will start using once again overgrip 0,5-0,6 mm to compensate the smaller grip size.
High praise indeed 👌 I enjoy your reviews and bought VCore Pro 97 on your advice 🤔 tempted to jump onto the blade 👍 thanks for the reply, and keep up the good work 👊
For me, this Emerald Green looks better with a tiny red Wilson logo on 1 side that I can always use it to hold my racket also when I swing I can see it passes my eyes, which would improve my forehand to hit sweetpot more often.
❗ ☝❗ CORRECTION ❗👇❗
At the time 5:50 I'm talking about the swingweight I measured. The number is wrong (I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet) - it's from the version Blade 100 V9. For this Blade 98 16x19 V9 I measured 💪326 SW, which goes perfectly with the specs. Sorry for my mistake! 🖐
I resisted getting a blade for years because it’s just too mainstream for me. Now I have two blade 98 v9’s because it was just so fun and instructive to play with. Hitting the sweet spot makes me happy
Exactly that's why I'm not a big fan of Wilson rackets in general. They are everywhere. But in case like this, when the racket is so good, it's a joy to hit with the best one even if it is mainstream.
I m about to be the same.. I ve been using the pro staff the past 6 months. Love everything except for the serve. It's so unforgiving on the serve. Hoping this blade is good on serve and still feels good on grounds strokes.
@@tomk5238 The Blade 18x20 is excellent on serve. The 16x19 version is not that good, it's ok. But it's probably the only area where the Blade 16x19 struggles a little bit let's say.
@@CzechTennisGuy why is 18x20 better? In my experience I m not good enough for a 18x20.
The main reason I want to change from pro staff is that I have found every other racquet I can hit 100mph. With the pro staff I m 10-15mph less. Everything else I like. So I m looking for something that has the same ground stroke but just easier to hit power and sweet spot on the serve.
@@CzechTennisGuy I thought pros use 18x20?? Why would u recommend 16x19 if even the pros don't wanna use?
I have to agree, flat out fantastic racquet. My first hit I had mixed feelings because I didn’t have my normal strings in there but once I cut those out and put my normal setup on the demo I fell in love. No complaints tbh. Best Blade right up there with V5. It is ripe for customization if that’s what you’re into but stock it is amazing/solid as well. 5.5+ level. The V8 was very good but I thought it was a little too flexy at times. This one gave not a stiffer feel but crisper. Highly recommend people give it a shot. I’m stuck between this and the Blade Pro. The V9 Blade is the most complete racquet out there right now and I’ve tried them all.
Hey I have the v9 blade 100. Any tips on string or other customization?
I love my V8 98 16x19....... awesome frame. I bet the V9 is great too. Love the Aston Martin Green colour :)
How does it compare to gravity pro?
This is very pleasing as I just happened to buy this today! All I had was some shadow swings in the shop and it felt amazing feel but when I got to the court I didn’t try it yet as I was a bit nervous to put down my pro staff six one 90! Now I’m looking forward to trying it out thanks 🙏
Only thing that puts me off getting this is the Wilson quality control - the swing weight, balance varies a lot from frame to frame. To get a racquet probably need to get the shop to check the spec first and match if getting more than one.
I sometimes play with a Wilson prostaff K factor 90 that's 385g as well, rallies are ok but it's tough playing sets with it given how heavy it is. Sometimes I feel a lighter racquet with head light balance would be better as I could get more racquet head speed instead of the plow.
How does the blade compare with the standard version of Prostaff?
Hi! I used all versions to Blade 98, incluyed H22 (standard and plus version). For me the best string is the ALU Rough, amazing!!! 23-22kg in CLAY!! enjoy the Manuuuubrability😂. greetings from Barcelona
Where did u get the h22?? And how much?
How would you compare it with the Prostaff V13? what has better what has worse?
Does blade v9, pure strike, or percept 100d have the best free power and launch angle? Thanks!!!
It's all Blade V9 who wins. Especially the version 100 has tremendous spin potential and great amount of free power with overall good control and precision.
I am looking for a new racquet and i am probably going with the v9 blade! just dont know which one... should i get the 100L and customize it to a decent spec? i would choose this for the head size or should i go with the 98 16x19? thx for any help
It depends on how you can play. The 100 will be great for most intermediate players. It's a lot more forgiving comapred to the 98 versions. The 100L for lower intermediate, women and juniors. The 98 versions for upper intermediate and advanced.
I have two tfight 300 iso. Im a topspiner player with a one handed backhand, i like the tfight. How would the Blade compare?
less spin, less power, less forgiveness and more control because of thin beam
When you compare it to the artengo tr960 what are the main differences? Thx
The Blade V9 feels more stable and powerful.
Thank you - your videos are brilliant and super informative. I'm interested to understand how you would compare the blades (18x20 + 16x19)to the prostaff 97 v14. I m demoing both the Blade v9 18x20 and the Prostaff at the moment and strangely feel that the blade feels more classic despite specs. I m moving from a prestige flexpoint mp 18x20 so that might be why? The Pro Staff feels like it is doing more to the ball vs what you are doing to the ball. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
My personal observation is that you have to let go the Pro Staff rackets to do the job instead of the Blades, where you kind of play more with the racket. So if you don't have the great fluid technique for the PS, just get the Blade where you can use more power of your arm and stay in touch with the frame. I hope you get this idea.
How does it compare to the Radical MP Auxetic?
@@faustobaldo I think that the Radical MP Auxetic is a great racket, but somehow it's harder to use effectively if you are not in the zone.
I’m wondering since you have or had play with Artengo 960, how do you compare Blade V9 16/19 versus Artengo?
I play with blade pro, before that blade always 18x20. Recently used a friends Artengo Tour. Artengo is not as good for slice, or power, but for half the price, very good racquet
Hello, great video ! 😁 do you think it’s better than the head extreme tour ? How do they compare ? Thank you !
Hi, yes, I think as a overall tennis racket, it's better. It's more complete and versatile.
@@CzechTennisGuy thanks for your answer ! I noticed that you have a quite classic technique on both FH and BH and I heard some people say that the blade was not really designed for extreme grips (strong semi-western / western). Could it be correct ?
Would I still be able to base my game on a lot of agressive spin ? (Playing on clay mostly)
Hey @Tennis Guy just wondering if they extended the grip length? Because the previous v8 the grip handle was short so my 2hb (top hand) was holding on the yoke
I think it is the same as it was, but I'm not 100% sure, I didn't measure it.
Agreed! Feel like we might have same style of play. What string tension do you think would work best in this blade 98 v9?
I use 24/23 kg. (53/51 lbs)
Wow glowing review. Very inclined to get it. Current v core pro 97 user
hey great video for this new blade
can you compare the percept 100,speed mp and pure aero 100? what I will get and lose trying the first two? I'm currently using the Babolat
Percept 100 - more feel and more control. Less spin potential and less free power. Speed MP - great control and very stable performance on all shots, mostly for flatter hitters. Very good allround racket.
What are the benefits of putting magnets on the RF97?
The magnets are there just as a weight - instead of lead tape. Each of the magnets is 10g so imagine how many lead tapes wou would have to put on the frame (throat section) to gain 20g of weight in total. Se he took magnets instead. And magicaly this works well.
This racket is everywhere.. seem like everyone using it.. it must be that good..
It's that good. And I'm not an Wilson tennis racket fan.
Is this a racquet for an 3.0 - 3.5 USTA?
I'm amateur player that has a bit of trouble with footwork but is working to improve? I currently have an Ezone100 but balls are going out a lot.
HELP pls.
You should try the version 100, you will feel the difference over the Ezone 100. The 98 is good for 4.5 and better players in my opinion.
Thank you so much!@@CzechTennisGuy
What do you think is the best racquet for my player profile? Ezone is just too powerful and muted. Not sure if the problem is me or the raquet. Im a very tall person 190cm. with aggressive delpotro forehand.
@@CzechTennisGuy
I love this channel!!! I want to ask you a very good question, for an aggressive baseline player, which of the two rackets do you recommend? wilson blade 98 16x19 v9? or babolat pure strike 98 16x19 2024?
Thank you. I think the Blade 98 16x19 V9 is the best 98 16x19 on the market right now.
How is it for flat hitting compared to the speed mp? Is the 18x20 more difficult to use (less manoeuvrable) than a speed pro 2022, I really liked the 2022 speed pro but it was too slow for my game.
The Blade 98 18x20 feels faster thanks to the 20.6 mm beam. But it's a beefy racket so it takes some effort to get the racket moving. But I think in the SW point of view the Blade 98 18x20 is very similar to Head Speed Pro so if you were able to play with the Speed Pro, you will master the Blade, too.
I have been using the Luxilon Alu Power 1.25 in grey, according to one of your reviews do you think the lime colour plays better with the Wilson Blade 98? I notice that this V9 version lifts the ball a lot and has a lot of flight, I think I liked the V 77 version better, which was very stable and had a lower launch angle, what do you think of this? Thank you very much for your great help to Tennis, my friend!!!!
I'm the same opinion. Since the version 7, which was one of the most demanding Blades out there, the V8 and V9 have bigger sweetspot, bigger spin potential and they produce more free power. And that's why the ball sometimes fly too much, too high, without control. I think with the next Blade V10, they will have to come little bit back to more control, more feel for the flatter shots etc.
Regarding the string - some say that the colour has a big impact on how the string plays. But I didn't observe that because I didn't test strings with different colours. So it's up to you to try them. Thank you for your support as always 🙌
Hey,
How does the Blade compare to the Speed pro 2024? I was looking to buy the Speed pro but the Blade also seems interesting, what do you think from your testing?
Hi, I like both rackets, but the Blade 98 16x19 felt super easy to play with. The Speed Pro feels heavier and slower during the swing.
@CzechTennisGuy interesting, thanks for the reply.
I think I will go with the Speed Pro though because I played with a Blade 98 18x20 and I feel I need a bit bigger headsize and I changed my playstyle to a more defensive counterpunching style and I think that the speed would help me more in that regard. And also I want a 18x20 for the control because I play with a full swing and with 16x19 I feel that the ball flies out more often.
@@RazvanAndreiChitu Sounds good to me, you've made some valid points. In your game and your style the Speee Pro can produce excellent results.
@CzechTennisGuy also I am a big guy, hitting the gym 5 times a week, so the weight should not be an issue, thanks a lot for yohr feedback, I really enjoy your channel, you are one of the most honest people when you do reviews, others just praise all the time everything
Amazing racket, buying my second next month
Great video. What be your preferd tension for the Alu Power for Blade v9 98 18x20?
I would say 24/23 kg / 51-53 lbs.
do you think the 100L version is far away, not used to heavy racket? or should for percept? thanks
I think the 100L can be an excellent option for a lower intermediate player. I tested the 100UL version of the Blade v8 and I was surprised how good it was. Light, with excellent manooovrlbity, but also great spin and feel. Stable enough for most basic shots, really nice easy hitting high performance frame.
@@CzechTennisGuy thank you very much
Which is better between v9 blade 16/19 or the head boom pro 16/19, as you seem to like the boom pro a lot
Also how do these compare to the pro staff 97 315 grams and the pure aero 98
So the Blade V9 16x19 is in my opinion the best 98 on the market in 2024. Boom Pro 16x19 is for more fun and casula game. Blade is definitely more competitive and delicate in every aspect. Pro Staff 97 is more precise, but it lacks the spin potential and free power of the Blade. The Pure Aero 98 is more powerful and less feel oriented. So the Blade is winning it in this comparison at least for my taste.
@@CzechTennisGuy thank you
How does the Blade compare to the Artengo tr960 16x19?
It has more free power, feels more stable with better overall feel. Spin is also very good. Almost in all aspects it feels like more all-round balanced racket.
@@CzechTennisGuy Thanks for your reply!
Been using the Aero 98 but for some reason you just made me pull out my Blade V5 to give it another crack before I head out to try the V9
i am glad i just bought it, based on the recommendation of my coach.
i am also playing with RF97A which i absolutely love. I was trying to find smth similar on the market but in a lighter package but it feels impossible. Has your hitting partner found smth similar to his RF97A?
No, he is a fan of his racket and he really doesn't take any interest in other rackets too much. I would say Blade is pretty different from Pro Staff. The Blade Pro shares little bit more similarities thanks to the boxed beam.
great video as always, but what string you use in this review, and tension
Thank you. String is Luxilon ALU Power 1.25 mm. I don't know the exact tension, but it felt like 23 kg.
What string and tens did you use in the test?
It's in the video description: String & Tension: Luxilon ALU Power (Lime Green) 1.25 at 25/24 kg (55/53 lbs)
In your opinion, what’s the best power racquet 100 headsize nowadays? Thanks a lot!
I would say it' still the Pure Drive. Then probably the Wilson Ultra 100 V4. You can also expect great power from a Tecnifibre TF-X1 300.
Thanks a lot!@@CzechTennisGuy
@@CzechTennisGuy Sorry for another question, but for you whats the best 100 inch, 300 grams Tennis racket in years? Big fan from Brazil! 😁
nice review ! i also love the V9 16x19. With how much kg do you string your V9 in your review? thanks
Thank you. I was strung at 25/24 kg, but it dropped for sure to 24/23 kg.
What is the best string for this blade? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you. I’m waiting for mine to arrive.
It depends on what you prefer. I like Head Hawk Touch, Head Lynx Tour, Black Code, Dunlop Explosive Spin. Luxilon ALU Power of course.
How do you compare with Pro staff X?
I didn't play with the Pro Staff X so I can't tell.
Thanks for the quick review. I am with you on the new blade v9 16x19, great update! No offense but I think your friend shouldnt play with this racket, I dont think footwork, technique etc matches a racket that heavy.
You are right. The problem is that my friend works with 3kg hammers all day long, he makes wooden roofs for hauses and he is super strong. So when he grabs a lighter racket, he has absolutely no feel for the frame because he doesn't feel it in his hand. 💪 It's crazy how a physical job can have such a huge impact on the feel of a racket.
How does it compare to
Blade pro
I didn't play with Blade Pro so I can't tell.
Will you release a final review of the blades @CzechTennisGuy?
I will for sure but now I don't have much time to edit it. It's already done, but it needs editing and that's what takes the most time. I'm going on a ski vacation for couple fo days and next week I will receive new Head Booms V2 for a review, so it's uncertain when the review will be out. Sorry for the delay.
Ok man no problem, already bought a v9 16x19(98) 🤣
what do you think of the 18x20? Just curious to know how it compares?
For me too heavy and less manooovrlble. Also the 18x20 pattern didn't suit my game. But interestingly I like the Wilson Blade Pro 18x20 more compared to the 16x19.
@@CzechTennisGuy i didnt know there was a weight difference between 18x20 and 16x19?
@@twenty2143 There shouldn't be a weight difference on the frame itself, but the 18x20 string pattern is denser = more string in the head = higher the SW and overall strung weight.
I dropped the V8 cause i thought it was not estable enough, and the sweetspot was not forgiving enough. Then i went to Radical mp 360+ Customized with 31.5cm Balance, and 330g total weight, i do like the stability and forgiveness the radical gave me, but i do miss the Blade maneuverability. I gave Ezone 98 a chance, too, but i do miss the control and maneuverability from the blade. The question is, does the V9 16x19 is stable as the Radicals are? And about the sweetspot is generous? I'm an 4.5+ player, wih an one handed backhand. Should i come back to the blades now? 😅 I've used the 2015 blade, the v6 v7 v8, i miss countervail stability, but i want a less stiff and more maneuverable Blade. Cya. Great videos, by the way. Congratz.
Thank you. I think the answer to your question is Blade V9. It has all the features you ask for. Easy to use, but powerful and stable at the same time. Great feel, great touch, superb manooovrlbity, big sweetspot, impressive top spin. It has all 99% of intermediate and advanced players need in todays modern game. Go for it. Just be sure you get the 98 16x19 version.
Tennis Guy! You got game, Bro!😀🎾Is there really a difference between the V8 and V9 Blades? Now, for this old 4.0 singles player, who needs racquet help on serve, etc. Should I go for the V9 16x19, or wait for the 100 Blade? Also, how does the V9 16x19 Blade match up with the Ezone 98? All the best, and have a great weekend! Ciao, John
Hey John! Great to see you and hear from you. Yes. Blades V8 were great, I really enjoyed them, too. But they were somehow specific in the flex, which was too low for my taste and the racket felt like a chewing gum in some situations. This V9 is complete - it's not stiff, it's just stable from the buttcap to the tip of the head. It reminds me the Percept, but it has more power and more spin potential. The feel is outstanding. I think the Ezone 98 is less control oriented with less precision and less spin potential. This 20,6 mm beam goes like a knife through a butter. It's fast, responsive, has great power and spin potential and it's super friendly to use. At least this is the one worth demoing at all costs. And then you will see for yourself. Enjoy the weekend John and let your tennis racket dream come true!
Blade v8 is not a blade to carry the blade heritage. V9 is back to its roots. V8 had inconsistent stringbed that could launch the ball and it couldn’t produce a heavy ball even after lead. V9 has top notch control….. a little bit more power and even more stable. Feel is less firm too. More wholesome in a way
@@TheodorosKolokotronis799 is it harder to swing because of high SW? Is the higher SW noticeable? I’ll wait for the 100 to make final decision..
@@johnnacke4134 no SW is similar around 310-320. Depending on Wilson QC.
@@TheodorosKolokotronis799 I think the Blade V9 is a combination of Blade V7 and Blade V8. The Blade V8 started the transformation to a more complete racket. I think it was a good first step. Not perfect, but very solid. I tested also the 100UL V8 and I was surprised how such a light (265g) frame can do some damage.
String tension?
Not sure about that, but it felt like around 23 kg.
Recently I was reading about the rigidity of the Blade V8, V9 and Noir. On the TW forum they also say that the Noir version could also be a V9 in disguise, since it was launched close to V9. I intend to purchase a Noir V8. How did that feel on the court? Did you find it too rigid? Something around 63-65RA? Big hug
Interesting. The black paint somehow almost always makes anything more rigid. Maybe it's just a placebo effectm who knows. Actually I felt the Blade V9 exactly somwehere around 65 RA. Not super soft, not super stiff. Medium and quite juicy. Like a beef steak. ;-)
@@CzechTennisGuy alright friend, thanks! and taking into account that it is a little more rigid, which string do you recommend for it? Lynx Tour, Hyper G, Confidential or 4g? All 1.25
@@pedrocostajuniorr From these strings I like Lynx Tour. I don't like Hyper G - it plays well at the beginning but when it looses tension it's weird, too soft, like playing with a chewing gum. I didn't hit with Confidential or 4G.
What about the 18x20 compared to the 16x19? I feel the v9 got powerful, and the v9 18x20 got more power than the v8 18x20
I think the Blade V9 in general is more powerful because it feels stiffer, more solid. It goes for both versions - 16x19 and 18x20.
Could this racquet just have been an enhanced base for the from the blade pro ?
What could the next generation improve or include, that would make you say , there is something that could have been better in the v9 , which makes the v10 better ?
Do you prefer the 16x19 based on a clay court game vs a hard court game . See AC tennis just yesterday on it and the 18x20 in comparisons to others . The blade pro and v5 apparently rated higher .
You sound like a wilson convert . You may want to be their distributor .
Tenniswarehouse sent me a demo that’s 330 SW. 332 with dampener. It’s a lot of a racquet. Beats the Percept 97 and Shift 99 I’m also demoing
It probably beats everything in this weight and size category except Tecnifibre TFight 305 or Pure Strike 98 18x20.
You are clearly in the honeymoon phase. The low swing weight of 313 is horrible compared to tw. I agree that the blade (also the v8) is suited for all different play styles, but to me it was too muddy. Currently the best racket i have ever tried and still have is the angell react 96 16x19 which can used for every style as well. It's not a 98, but the sizes are overrated. I have some 95 rackets that are easier to use than some 100 rackets. Head shape and string pattern drilling have big impact and in many cases more than the size of the hoop
Nope he is not. I already tested v9 and mine had 315SW and was amazingly stable :)
I made a mistake with the SW. I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet. I measured 326. The 313 number is for the version 100. I've put this note into the video description and also pinned this as a comment. I'm sorry for this mistake.
I made a mistake with the SW. I looked at the wrong column in my SW sheet. I measured 326. The 313 number is for the version 100. I've put this note into the video description and also pinned this as a comment. I'm sorry for this mistake.
How does it compare to the woody Rod Laver Racket
That's a question even a Tennis Guy has problem answering. I don't really know. But I bet that for todays modern tennis the Blade V9 is 100% a better racket.
What grip size are you?
My best fit is grip size #3. US 4 3/8. Or grip size #2 US 4 1/4 + overgrip Wilson Pro Overgrip = this is the setup I have tested the Blades.
@@CzechTennisGuy that’s interesting. So would you use an overgrip on a size 3?
@@DJScharlie Actually I still use it on my Artengo racket, but later it feels too thick to me. I will be 40 years old soon and I feel that my fingers and palm gets thicker. So the space in my palm is filled more with the muscles and skin. The fingers stay the same in lenght or they even get shorter. After some time my hand will get slimmer for sure when I start to loose muscles and my hand will shrink so I will need a thicker grip, maybe even size 4 like when I was 25-30 years old. But at this age I need more feel and that comes from a thinner grip.
@@CzechTennisGuy Great advice for someone like me, I’m the same age. I like my Head Radicals but I’m tempted to buy the new blade. 🤔
@@DJScharlie The Blades are easier to use comapred to the Radicals. So if you want to have easier time on court but also with great performance, go for the new Blades.
I think the 100 is the clutch for a 3.5 to 4.0. Just so forgiving and plush feel.
The 100L will be a super easy racket to use as well.
I tested this racket and thought it played great, but it lacked a little power compared to the speed pro 2022. Maybe the wrong stringing?
Love the speed pro. Thicker beam of speed easily gives it more power
The speed feels a lot slower then the Blade.
@@HendriBrouwer well it does have a thicker beam and a higher swingweight. It feels clunkier through the air at times but it creates a much deadlier ball
Everything you say is true yhe best feeling racket easy comfy but the power is lacking and i s difficult to fix at lest on the V8 for becase it was so mushy and absorbing .I hope yhis one responds to lead 3&9 better
How did you customise your v8? Just curious to see what I could try
@Batwam0 4g Led @ 3&9 total plus 4g blue tac in trap door, and string with gut poly but is absorbing heavy balls an let me down on some return
It may be different with v9
Do me a favour and tell me few words. V9 16x19 vs CX200 and 400 tour 2024. In terms of power potential and connection of feel ??? ❤
I can't tell since I did not try the other rackets, sorry.
You mention that you find the new Blade 98 16x19 overall better than the Percept 97. Is it because of the extra free power or other major differences? And could the ALU Power be the main reason for this? A detailed comparison between these 2 rackets would be awesome as they are both targeting the same audience!
It's definitely the free power and also the spin potential and bigger sweetspot. You need to get used to the Percept 97 and that's what most people don't like to do - they want to buy a tennis racket that works for them right from the start. And the Blade is that racket. The Percept is specific with the Isometric headshape and a quite low powered frame. I would say you have to be a better player to get the most of the Percept 97.
The ALU Power can definitely be a big part of the overall success of this racket. Strings are 50% of the performance of a tennis racket. But I would not just "blaim" the strings. I tested the Percept with Yonex PolyTour REV recommended string so both of the rackets were played with the best possible setup recommended by the manufacturer.
Tennis Guy: Have you hit with the Blade v9 100? The v9 will come to the states in mid- March. Should I wait for the V9, or get the v8, which is on discount at TW? I will eventually get the v 9 98 16x 19… I string all of my rackets with Champions Choice hybrid: natural gut in mains( 55 or 53) , ALU Power rough in cross ( 52 or 50).. what do you think? Best, John🎾🎾🎾🎾
That's a good idea to try the V8 98 16x19 for a discount, John. I liked the V8, too. It's more flexible. Champions choice hybrid is hard to beat, so go for it. Never played with ALU Rough so I can't tell the difference. Cheers ✌
Do you prefer this blade or shift 99?
I prefer this Blade. Shift 99 is in some situations too powerful and unpredictable. Also Shift wears strings faster, loss of tension is more significant and that leads to loss of control.
Agree 100%
I think the Pure Drive 98 is the best 98 square inch racket I have ever played with.
Blade lacks the punch that Pure Drive 98 provides on the ground strokes.
Why don't you try out the new Pure Drive 98 to find out for yourself?
The 18x20 is way better. It has more stability, control and same power due to higher SW. Spin is decent and depends more on your technique... The 16x19 feels like u sacrifice a lot for a little more spin and launch angle ,)
I can feel that this can be true. But I really need that extra power and spin, being a light guy. But if someone is a strong tournament player, the 18x20 can be the perfect choice for sure.
@@CzechTennisGuy Both frames have a demanding nature, in terms of power they are not very different. The 18x20 gets the power from its higher SW, the 16x19 from a more powerful pattern. The 16x19 only has that little more spin and reactive stringbed but is worse anywhere else.... for most not worth the trade off!!
@@hybrid11theory75 I did not test the 18x20 version so I can't tell the difference. In general 18x20 patterns are more muted and "lazy" then 16x19, so that's why the 16x19 is almost always more popular among amateur players.
@@CzechTennisGuy You really have totry the 18x20. As the other commenter said, it’s so superior to the 16x19. Way more stable and you can get more power and spin out of it just because you know exactly how much power to put into the racket
@@thelongtrombone3528 I can see that. But I usually don't like 18x20 patterns because they are too stiff and muted. And I almost never get the 18x20 versions for a review so I can't test this one now. Maybe later at some point but I don't think this will happen. Sorry.
Hey Tennis Guy, is there something wrong with this upload? The video doesn't appear under my subscriptions, I can only find it when I click directly on your channel. The videos before appear under my subscriptions.
Hi Dan, it's uploaded as always with the same settings. Not sure what's going on with your sub. Try it later or try to re-sub.
I actually enjoyed the V8 a little bit more than the V9. I felt the V8 a bit more headlight and maneuverable.
That's true. But at the same time the V8 is not so complete in terms of stability. It's more precise and feel oriented, but with less free power and lower spin potential.
@@CzechTennisGuy Yeah, which I actually prefer. I like solid headlight racquets like my old Pro Staff 6.1 Classic 95.
Have you tried the Blade Pro 16x19?
Yes I did and It was a very different experience. Feels more like a Pro Staff + Ultra hybrid. Quite heavy for every day use. Pro stock feel is unique, very connected, compact, solid feel. But it was too low powered for my taste, quite small sweet spot because it is a 97 in2 head size and felt too heavy for my game.
@@CzechTennisGuy Interesting . I ordered one last night. I play with a Gravity Pro but also have a Blade 98 18x20 in my bag. I like the Blade but hit too flat with it. Ive used the 16x19 V8 previously but found it too light, so I'm hoping the Pro will fit the bill
Good for One-Handed Backhand?
That's what I want to know...
Zdenek my sparing partner from the video plays one handed backhand. He tried the racket too and he liked it. But for him it's too light. He plays with the customized Pro Staff RF97 strung at 384 g. Just insane.
Zdenek my sparing partner from the video plays one handed backhand. He tried the racket too and he liked it. But for him it's too light. He plays with the customized Pro Staff RF97 strung at 384 g. Just insane.
Only concern is quality control that is better in yonex
What about the 18x20?
The 18x20 is more difficult to swing with. I really felt the higher swingweight, which I measured 333. I like the stringbed though, it makes the shots more surgical and the punch from the racket is greater when you hit it. I felt the benefit of the 18x20 on the serve, too. It's because the higher swingweight hits the static ball on serve with more power and plowthrough. Great stick, too, but for me too demanding.
What do you make of others reviewers observations that say it’s underpowered?
It is. Mine was 314 SW strung and shots outside of the sweet spot go into the net for me
@@glademasternot for me… maybe something else
If you can generate your own power then it’s not problem… just demo it and try it… best racket I’ve ever bought and hated Wilson rackets before but this has changed the game
Cut the string and try another string to find out if you have the best string racquet combo or not. Maybe it will feel even better with your favorite string, if that's possible?
The Blade 98 is a plug-and-play racket
Ahoj, mam dilema jestli koupit 100 nebo 98. Je tam velky rozdil v přesnosti a odezve do ruky nebo jsou v tomto ohledu temer nastejno? Diky moc
Ahoj, co se týče kontroly a přesnosti, tak v tom je jednoznačně lepší verze 98 16x19. Od verze 100 to zase více letí zadarmo, člověk se tolik nenadře a má výraznější spinový potenciál (široká hlava rakety). Stovková verze má taky mnohem větší sweetspot a odpouští nečisté zásahy. Je to hodně pohodová raketa, přitom dost výkonná na to, aby uspokojila i náročnější tenisty. Stabilní a komfortní jsou obě verze podobně. Zásadní je tedy švihová hmotnost - u verze 100 jsem naměřil jen 313 a u verze 98 16x19 326. To už je výrazný skok nahoru. Záleží tedy jak moc dobře hraješ a jakou máš celkovou zkušenost s tenisem. Pro slušné turnajové a vynikající klubové hráče co mají tenis jako hlavní sport a mají chuť se pořád zlepšovat bude lepší verze 98. Pro nadšené amatéry, co nejezdí po turnajích a chodí si zahrát dvakrát týdně bude bohatě stačit verze 100. Ono takhle rozhodovat naslepo je hrozně těžký. Musel bych vidět jak hraješ. Za mě tedy bohatě bude stačit verze 100 naprosté většině tenistů. Někdo možná ocení ještě lehčí model 100L nebo 100UL. Záleží na výkonnosti.
Díky moc za cenné informace. S 98 ale verzi V8 jsem rok hrál a je fakt dobrá akorát já jsem spíš na agresivnější styl hry a nevím jestli by ta 100 v9 nebyla pro můj styl lepší ale zase nechci přijít o tu odezvu do ruky kterou jsem měl s tou 98. Tak uvidím 😊 Fandím ti a přeju ať se ti daří.
@@LukasPolak-j3e Je pravda, že hraní s verzí 100 je zkrátka takové bezstarostné. Prostě tu raketu chňapneš do ruky a jdeš do toho mlátit hlava nehlava beze strachu, že by ti neodpustila pár nečistých zásahů. Někdy můžeš mít horší den a ty 98 už to dají znát. Dokonce bych neměl problém mít v bagu verzi 100 jako záložní raketu pro horší dny. To prohození je jednoduché, člověk si na nic nezvyká, ba naopak se mu uleví. Také držím palce ať se daří a díky moc za podporu z Čech ✌
From other reviews V9 is more beefy (SW is increased) than V8, less maneuvrable and not overall better. Your review seems like comparing blade 280grams or Blade 300grams with soft string like Yonex PTP...such setup would have the similar effect...
Technology wise there isn’t much changed in v9 compared to v8.
There is something strange about this v9 racquet… I prefer the plush feel of the v7 and its great stability, the v9 version sometimes throws a very long and high ball… it is like some technology that makes it easier to play with. The v7 version literally crushes the ball and has unmatched precision, I am sorry to say that for me the best racquet of the blade series is the V7
I agree. That's the one thing that I would complain about the V9. The launch angle is very high and sometimes I just lost control of the ball without really knowing the reason behind it. I'm saying that too, that the V7 was one of the most solid Blades ever made. Very good plowthrough and pop. Flet hevier and more demanidng, though. Since V8, the Blades become easier and easier to play with for the widest audience possible.
My racquet of choice, not the best at anything, but great at everything.
Great description 👏. I would say this racket is 8/10, maybe even 9/10 at everything which is hard to beat.
Tecnifibre TF40 16x19 enters the chat... ,)
The TF40 is more like the new Pure Strikes 98. I don't really see too much in common with the Blades.
@@CzechTennisGuy Allround, Comfort, Control, Stability? Pure Strikes are way stiffer feeling...
@@hybrid11theory75 The new ones 4th Gen feel better in comfort. Still crisp and clean, but little bit more plush feel is there.
This V9 would have to be a gargantuan step forward over the V7 and V8, both of which were two of most unpleasant racquets I've ever had the misfortune to play with; they're dead like a plank of wood.
V9 is much nicer looking though.
The V9 feels more alive. It's because it's overall stiffer/stable and it has generates more free power. The racket is more alive.
I might take it for a hit if one comes across my path@@CzechTennisGuy but I won't be racing over there.
Where is blade pro :)
Oh man, I wish I had a chance to play with Blade Pro one day. Not sure how to get it here. Maybe I will ask directly Wilson representative.
@@CzechTennisGuy I have one v7 pro 16x19 G2 , what Grip size you play with?
@@bushmenaa Now I play with grip size 3 + 1 overgrip 0.4 mm. But I will switch 1 size down in the future, because I want more feel. And I will start using once again overgrip 0,5-0,6 mm to compensate the smaller grip size.
buy buy buy
Hiw about 18/20 version ? Some say it’s better than this
For me the 16x19 is always better, it's easier to hit with.
Fantastic marketing 😳 every year a racket is fantastic and unbelievable 🤷♂️ not the best of the best it’s a good racket 👍
I'm not a Wilson guy, except tennis shoes. But the Blade V9 is really so good that it blows the competition away pretty easily.
High praise indeed 👌 I enjoy your reviews and bought VCore Pro 97 on your advice 🤔 tempted to jump onto the blade 👍 thanks for the reply, and keep up the good work 👊
@@charlieb3497 Thank you, I appreciate it. 👍
I prefer the paint job of the previous one
I agree but looks better in person… a lot of people say the same too
For me, this Emerald Green looks better with a tiny red Wilson logo on 1 side that I can always use it to hold my racket also when I swing I can see it passes my eyes, which would improve my forehand to hit sweetpot more often.
Willson should offer you a Job or one million dollars to retire, because you have reached as it seems the Nirvana in tennis racquets testing😅
Why u didnt switch it
At that time I wasn't interested in switching to that brand. But with the RF 01 I found something unique and special.