I really appreciate your reviews. I like that you add details like using multiple string setups and give the gauges and tensions used. It’s extremely useful because not all rackets in my experience works with all string tensions or string types.
The reason i do it is because i need to see how the frame reacts , if it plays well at my normal tension then i dont experiment, but sometimes it might not, so i lower the tension and see if anything positive comes out of it Same with strings, i will intentionally try certain strings to test if a racquet is going to be overly stiff, or if that it plays well with a mediocre string, then its 100% going to play better in my favourite setups
Totally agree with your take. The 18x20 is far superior to the 16x19. It has way more control, plow and stability while comfort is excellent. It bothers me why most reviewers praising the 16x19 so much. The 18x20 is arguably the better choice.... the little more spin and power of the 16x19 is not worth the sacrifice in control and plow/stability!!
Phenomenal attention to detail and context, Bravo🙏. I have had multiple V5 Blades for 5 years+, which has allowed me to benchmark different set-ups, My conclusion is that the Blade really improves greatly in all areas, especially in growing the sweet spot from adding weight to 3, 9 and 12 as long as you counterweight in the handle to maintain a 315mm to 325mm (strung) balance, even if you have to go above your normal preferred static weight you can add more weight to handle for a more head light balance, Also going up 2-4 pounds in string tension to help with controlling the extra power/plough this set up will deliver. I would highly recommend giving this a try.
@@ACTennis BTW, This was done on the (16x19) racquets, I did this on a Blade V5 (18x20) which also improved the performance, I ended up missing the top cross making it an (18x19) which lifted the launch angle and pop slightly.
@@winniecarl Hey mate! May I ask how much lead/weight do you recommend adding to the Blades and where? Cheers! I currently have a V9 18x20 - SW came in at 328! Cheers!
Could you elaborate on the hidden spin potential of the strike you mentioned in the video? How can a racket that doesn’t move well on a vertical string path have high spin?
It's ability to generate spin doesnt solely rest on the manoeuvrability, rather ones skill to hit through aggressively, and even though it's a bit harder to do that with the Strike, it has very good spin potential , just watch how much Thiem used to get on his forehand with an 18x20 strike, but he did use the the G3 frame but custom with custom 70 stiffness layup (also probably why he got wrist injury lol)
Thanks for the support and kind words, i subbed - you have a different type of channel because you actually upload frequently haha, ill check out your videos! appreciate it
Hi! Just bought the Blade V9 18*20, but not yet played it. Going to compare it with my other rackets, Dunlop cx200 tour + tungsten in hoop, Yonex vcore 97D, Solinco whiteout 16x19, and Babolat pure Aero 98. They all feel great with each their own drawbacks. Best feel is Dunlop hands down. What is your take on this list AC?
Wow. Randomly got recommended this video, insane detail! Looking forward to more content from you brother. ❤ ( We got the same style strokes so i am super excited to get on this channel)
Definitely and a ton better now than i was at that time, also i was so injury ridden then aswell, dont think i could sum the money to buy it but i cant remember but i think i saw new phantoms on the horizon? we'll see how much they cost
My Blade v9 16x19 came in around 306g, fine balance, but 288 Swingweight unstrung. It was the best option out of the 7 the shop provided the specs from. Others were very close in SW, weight and balance. My setup now is: With Diadem Pro X 1.20 @ 22kg, a few grams in the buttcap, Overgrip and Tourna dampener: 331g / 32.4balance (6HL) / SW I think 221 ( did this by hand so prone to errors. )
Like your comparison charts. Any reason why you did not integrate a Yonex Percept 97, since it's also a control oriented frame (97, 97H or 97D)? Very curious to compare both.
Excellent review, love the graphs! What racket would you recommend for a 4.0 all court player Blade V9 18x20, 16x19, ISO 305, 315, TFight 40, RF01, Radical MP, extreme MP, or something else? I currently play with vcore98 98 tour, it's erratic, too demanding for my 2h sessions.
@@martynasaleksonis4984 I have two, 328-330 SW, 327g 32.8cm balance, or if i reduce static weight, the SW is not as much of a problem, so 338 SW, 323g, 33.2cm balance
@@chadallen3211 The Blade Pro feel is unbeatable, because its very true and original to no technology used, for Blade Pro id pick 18x20 because the 16x19 is very open, may lose out on some control For v9, i could choose either pattern, but the only reason is choose 18x20 here because i think it feels plusher and nicer, also more direct control - but i may like the 16x19 for a bit more power and launch angle if i feel i need it
Either Tru Pro Firewire Boost, or Alupwer - normally i dont like alupower because it's a bit too stiff for me, but in the sweetspot it was fine and a welcome addition due to the muted feel, being a more crisper playing poly
Great review. How would you compare both racquets to the Gravity Pro? Looking for a frame that's a bit more maneuverable as my Gravity Pro can sometimes feel a bit sluggish. Leaning towards getting the 18x20 version for the stability, but wanted to get your opinion on how the 16x19 would compare to the Gravity Pro as well. Thank you!
If you're looking for something with more Gravity like control and feel, it would be the 18x20, maybe get it at a bit lower swingweight around 326-328 area, that might give you some room to feel less cumbersome with it Otherwise if you want a little more power and spin marginally, stability is pretty comparable for both, for me a head heavier blade is harder to swing than my Gravity Pro which i play almost stock specs
@@ACTennis Thank you for the reply! Yeah, I have a wrist issue and comfort is very important for me. Also wanted to ask about comfort as I am trying to figure out whether the better comfort of 18x20 that you mentioned in the review will "offset" the higher SW and put less of a strain on my wrist than the 16x19. Thanks in advance!
Love your OHBH! I also use one but not nearly as consistent. Currently using Whiteout 18x20. Wondering what you suggest for a 3.5-4.0 player with a OHBH to try?
Nah i demoed this one but it was easy to hit enough to get a good idea of how it plays over a week, since i'm directly coming off using the 16x19 version, so i never bought 18x20, but if i were to buy one of the two, would be the 18x20
After watching this review, feel like the tfight 305 is a very good racket, very all rounded just like the ezone. Is the tfight very difficult to play with?
Yeah, the specs do not come out very user friendly, your best chance is to buy a very low swingweight one, and technically it doesnt play as well as it would with its general heavy specs, but still plays pretty well
How monstrous of a racket is the Tfight iso 305, nearly at the top of every category with the exception of maneuverability ? Is it really that good ...?
what a great review.. exactly what I was looking for.. my ears were deceiving me a bit hearing the 18x20 portion but for some reason I gravitate to denser string patterns like the Strike 18x20 and the old hated countervail 18x20.. mine broke at the throat and it's left a hole in my options.. but I've been playing with the strike 18x20 so if the Blade V9 is indeed that impressive I might skip the 16x19 that I had my eyes on.. coming from the Yonex side I still use the older Ezone Xi 98 which is stiffer and haven't ever like many of the newer versions (ai was a lot of peoples favorite for awhile before the dr's).. but I do like the vcore 98, and the plus ezones are ok not great.
I played with Kyrgios's Xi for a little bit, loads of power and spin, very fun Blade 18x20 will probably be dependent on swingweight for performance, i have a bit of a reluctance to think it will perform the same. way without at least a decent swingweight
@@ACTennis completely makes sense, I added weight to the handle and some long lead strips to the xi long ago @ 3/9 and never looked back, stock form I probably wouldn't do for the yonex, maybe also why I haven't always liked the AI or DR as much.. but anything in 325-low 330s range usually is welcomed.. I guess thin beam faster racquets to me are more enjoyable but with still having some heft. Pure Strike v1 16x19 I have is setup similar to the ezone Xi.
Hey mate, do you know of any Australian retailers that measure swing weight? or is my best bet to get a low static weight hoping that it means low SW? Want a strike 98 16x19 2024 with a sub 330 SW (325ish)
Tennis only Richmond , or Tennis warehouse Australia have swingweight machines, not sure if the 2nd one will premeasure for you before you buy, but Tennisonly will I want one of those too haha If you have no options, you need to find the lowest static weight with the most headlight balance
Tennis warehouse Australia used to be accommodating to wanting a specific spec a few years ago, but they told me last year they are no longer measuring racquets for clients (unless I got in contact with a staff member that CBF). I know tennis only will take requests for static weights, didn't know they would for swing weight. Thanks.@@ACTennis
@@ashton2410 It has to be the retail store though, not the online store, Melbourne one has a swingweight machine , not sure about the new NSW merger one - call the Melbourne one they should usually assist
I’m still loving my 18x20 v8s. The feel and cupping are fantastic. Nonetheless I agree is a tough racquet to buy if you (1) want to play it at stock specs and (2) don’t have access to a swingweight machine /customization. Mine are all bang on 313gr 31.6cm and 295sw. Unstrung ra 62-64.
Im looking at the Blade 98 and 100 , 16x19… As a 4.0 senior singles player with a ohb and good touch, the 100 might suit me better. TW has some V8 100’s available; the V9 hasn’t come in yet. Is the V9 100 worth waiting for? And does the 100 best fit my ability… Thanks, John
Not worth to wait for the v9 blade 100 as the v8 plays more than fine, solid in all categories and not sure about most people but i found one hander is very good because it was lighter than the 98 but could plow through the ball
@@ACTennis I’ve been trying the Ezone 98…. My elbow seems to be developing some sensitivity… I don’t know if it’s me or the racquet. I may send it back and go for the Blade 100…or the Blade 98 16 x 19 v9..I had to add this edit… your analysis is right on..awesome video…I don’t like to screw around with customization..rather go with stock, but I will work with TW to get spec or below spec… I string my racquets with champions choice hybrid ( gut in mains at 55 or 53; poly in cross at 52 or 50)…
I think that the sweetspot was slightly more forgiving on the 18x20 actually, because it plays alot softer, and a bit more stable for some reason at a similar spec It was easier for me only because the balance was better on the quality control, if it was same balance then probably not
Excellent review as always. So are you saying that the sweetspot in upper part of hoop for 18x20 is better/not harsh with no dead spot. with the v8, putting lead at 10&2 seemed to help with this. more consistent stringbed is why I usually get the blade in 18m. thanks again for vid
It didnt disappear, but because it was softer and the stability was also noticeably better, it helped, but i cant add weight to the tip personally due to my weak ass not being able to handle above 330 SW lol
Hi! Im attacker player using full-western grip with a lot of generative spin. Do you recommend the 16x19 or the 18x20? Currently playing with the shift 300 16x20 and love it! Looking to get an advanced racket so the blade on the spot for me.
@@noynizri7860 Nothing wrong with the shift, probably suits your game better than a Blade - Blade will take away alot of your spin which is probably weaponized - i would stick with something that enhances your strengths if you already like it, dont force a change for no reason - but if youre looking to have fun, then try the 16x19 , 18x20 will be too closed for you probably
If you are more concerned with the feel, the racquet flexes a less i.e bending sensation but still offers that a similar impact feel, i think v7 probably plays more forgiving though just because its so soft , i need to adjust my ratings since i reviewed my v7 very eatly on my rating scales
I’ve been playing 9 months with shift pro and can’t get use to higher launch angle on FH and acknowledge my style is for flatter shots. Is it worth going towards blade v9 18x20 or going back to my previous Wilson 98 v6 CV 18x20? Cheers Russ
Whatever you feel more comfortable with, maybe less powerful than a CV, but alot more comfortable, if that's what you look for in a change for your Blade, it could be the right in that sense
@@TheodorosKolokotronis799 NGL first hit fresh strings T1 BK actually hurt lol, i played again once the strings really settled in just by leaving it there, then i started to gel with it pretty well - atm it it seemed to feel similar to the current FX line, the FX 98 Tour anyway, which i wasn't all that impressed by - but performance wise it seemed so far so good
@@ACTennis I didn’t not enjoy fx 98 tour. Good power, great stability but the feel was kinda muted. So from your answer i suppose you prefer v9 right now ?
I'm quite adaptable to most racquets as long as i can swing them, but even still i usually will just find the best way i can manage it - gravity pro has the control of the v9 18x20 but alot more power than both string patterns, as well as more spin and more forgiving
Doesn't really stand for anything, it refers to the actual shape of the racquet, so its flat on the inside and rounds out on the outside, D with a capital letter is probably what is refers to On contrary Pro Staff is a box beam, where its just very rectangular / squared off at the edges
Blade has more top end power in big swings, higher launch angle, less penetrating spin, better for flat attacking shots - Regna is consistent, has nicer quality feel / feedback, plays nicer for OHBH, both serve well and probably more unforgiving at the same tension, but plays much better at lower tensions
@@indragazali I use Volkl Vsquare 1.20mm and TruPro Ghostwire 1.22mm , 48lbs You will lose alot of natural power on Gravity if you switch from Ezone 100, its good for the arm, but hard to use If you really have arm issues, Clash V2 100 is not a bad racquet, i like it actually, plenty of power and comfort
I much preferred court ff2, it was lower to ground but all the stability with enough comfort and didnt feel overly heavy - court ff3 feels heavy and chunky, i dont feel as coordinated with them speed 3s are more between speed 2s and gel res, didnt feel like 2s were stable enough for what i wanted, but the 3s seem to have made it more sturdy and rigid but still keeping it light
@@ACTennis yeah court 3 are very rigid. They feel like they don’t give you freedom to move. Funny thing they play awesome on clay. They suck on hard court. Speed 3s reminded me of a lighter closer to the ground vapor x. They are fast but 2s were more cushioned. Your opinion on resolution 9 ?
I am hunting reviews all day for at least 2 weeks now but i just discovered this ge(m)ntleman. Thanks for the contect and luckily we have similar style of play, so i am really lucky to have found you. Really considering this racket. Time for me to buy my second racket after around 17 years with the 106sq in nblade (v1 i guess) 😅
@@ACTennis To be honest i played a few balls with prestige pro and fell in love with the buttery feel and precision. So i really consider prestige mp l which i can handle and maybe customize. Thank you for your content again!! Wish the best for you! 🙏
This is really a playstyle question and not one i hope you will follow because of what i prefer lol - both are great racquets - i would play better with Blade 18x20 because i attack flat and aggressive more often and the tighter pattern will give me that extra control on big shots to hit very tight targeting, also will be faster for me to serve with, more plush and comfortable for long term arm health, and better suited for 1 hander in terms of shape and feel
Probably safer for overall arm health, v6 countervail might be hiding the stiffness only, rather than actually being comfortable , ive had to go through alot more tennis elbow and wrist issues since i used it, and for how i am now, id rather be safe than sorry - but performance wise they are both good, v6 is just gonna be more powerful
All racquets can produce spin, but predominantly is on users abolity - IMO alot of people mistaken spin for margin (height) of the arc over the net, you can get the ball to bounce high on most shots, but how heavy is the actual rotations is what matters Blades are flat playing racquets, always have been, precision is the key, and some spin is there if you are good enough to access it
played with V8 98 16x19 , 324 SW, 32.6cm balance, 330g with overgrip and dampener, alupower 1.25mm @ 46 for a couple sessions right before i bought the V9
@@ACTennis yeah they're very hard to come by in my country. Which one out of v7, v8 and v9 would you recommend. I know it's tough v8 is anemic etc I've played with a v7 and it definitely needed a stiffer shaped poly like a lux original rough played great. I'm interested in v9 vs v7 comparison cheers
@@revio000 Its kind of like a v7 , but there is less bending sensation, maybe v7 feels more forgiving because its so soft, but because the 18x20 is also, then it becomes quite similar - i wouldnt say they are that far different other than feel, playability of blades tend to be all the same with minor tweaks herr and there to feel and swingweight
@@ACTennis I guess many things are a bit subjective and everyone perception is different. Anyway love the review! My radical mp aux is my racquet of choice but I also like to play around with the v9 from time to time! :)
Would you prefer the 18x20 to the blade 100 in a match? Also, how would you rank it in a match against the ezone 98 and iso? Great video btw, super insightful.
If i could only pick one, probably. 18x20 blade because i am ultra aggressive in matches, i need as much control as possible, but its also slighter thinner beam so its faster at the same specs - also i like the plushness, it jives with my game because i already use the gravity pro which would be in the same ball park of pocketing and feel Same against Ezone and ISO, it may be a vanilla safe choice because it has the similar density to my current main, but the serving would be an upgrade and comparable enough to the ezone but better for my grohndstrokes - ISO is helpful because of its spin generation, but due to the head heaviness it would be a less safe option for me - its more of a trump card
@@rubinsingh4779 Whatever you feel best with mate, maybe find a demo if speed mp, i thought that speed pro and mpnmoved pretty well with the one hander if you got it headlight enough
Vcore 98, over the years we switched around from Blade v7, Ezone 98, Speed MP 2022 and to this, really suits her style and strokes, so no more switching
It would be super interesting to many if she did a Blade 100 v8 vs v9 comparison, she plays great. I've long thought that girls and women don't get nearly enough consideration in racquet reviews, and Blade 100 is massively 'endorsed' on WTA tour. If you could find a Steam 100 to compare too, that would be fabulous, and super useful to so many junior girls and young competitors @@ACTennis
Speed pro being a 1820 is very easy to get spin compared to the gravity tour I've tried. Nevertheless, speed pro is 100 head size so it's not a complete surprise. However, Blade 98 1820 is surprisingly easy to play compared to other 1820 I've tried in a 98 head size.
@@ACTennis I couldn't resist and bought a 16*19. The unstrung SW is about 290. With 1.25 ALU Power it's about 320 SW. Do you know the unstrung SW of your 16*19? I find mine a bit unstable unless I absolutely hit the sweet spot. I like the current SW though. So I'm not sure whether I should add maybe 2g at 3&9 and get used to the added SW or just work on hitting the sweet spot more accurately.
@@ACTennis Thanks for the advice. I added 2.5g at 3&9. The SW goes up to 325. It feels too head heavy so I countered with 3.7g along the handle. It's now 329g, 325SW. Best racket I've used.
As much as everyone else, i.e potentially a small batch only for specific regions, or probably just none at all because it wouldnt make sense for a company to sell 3 string patterns - i am possibly about to get my hands on Kordas personal racquet, so it will tell me if its even close to the layup of the current gen blades or not
Thats why peopke shouldn't complain about too headlight balance. Impossible to reduce swingweight, but possible to increase with incremental lead additions at 12 o clock.
I think most Blades (proper spec) are going to be like this, since one with correct weight and balance looks to be about mid to higher 320s, i got a tiny bit unlucky, but on the rare ocassion i could not premeasure
@@ACTennis I haven't. It's funny, ever since I left the Gravity Tour behind for 98s, I've found myself really sensitive to drag. 98s with 23mm or higher and 100s just feel slow in the air to me. I can do tapered beams on 98s, but not a constant 23mm beam. I have found Radical MP and PA98 to be sufficiently maneuverable.
I'm sorry, I had to take the Wilson claims on QC with a pinch of salt and a massive dose of LMAO .... The joke is still on the consumer. Buy at own Risk.
I do appreciate your detailed review, but not a fan of that camera work. It makes me too dizzy to watch because court is rotating while you are hitting, and I could not concentrate on what you are actually saying about the racquet.
Kind of doesn't make much sense if almost all racquets currently don't come in over a 335 swingweight - how many viewers would you say are beyond a 5.0 level? Needing to add copious amount of lead to fix the flaws of a racquet is rather cheating if anything Same logic would apply that Medvedev isn't deserving to be a top #3 player because he uses a 327 swingweight
Insane detail. Hands down the king of racquet reviewers.
there's a reason i'm subbed - best racquet reviewer on YT. Thanks AC.
Thanks for the support!
I really appreciate your reviews. I like that you add details like using multiple string setups and give the gauges and tensions used. It’s extremely useful because not all rackets in my experience works with all string tensions or string types.
The reason i do it is because i need to see how the frame reacts , if it plays well at my normal tension then i dont experiment, but sometimes it might not, so i lower the tension and see if anything positive comes out of it
Same with strings, i will intentionally try certain strings to test if a racquet is going to be overly stiff, or if that it plays well with a mediocre string, then its 100% going to play better in my favourite setups
Totally agree with your take. The 18x20 is far superior to the 16x19. It has way more control, plow and stability while comfort is excellent. It bothers me why most reviewers praising the 16x19 so much. The 18x20 is arguably the better choice.... the little more spin and power of the 16x19 is not worth the sacrifice in control and plow/stability!!
I HAVE THE BLADE 8 16x9 thx for in info
I have a love/hate relationship with the blade, maybe this is the one 🤭. Thanks for your review as always
Love the comparison charts and the notes on comfort, which not enough reviewers focus on
It is a sin for you not having all the Tennis subscribers. Absolute top notch reviews!!!
Thanks appreciate the support !
The review we ve been all waiting. ❤
Weird having to wait for a video from someone in the future.
That intro was incredible, you’ve outdone yourself again!! 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you madam 😊
AC Tennis deserves every view and donation that other tennis channels are getting
Too kind 🥲
Excellent (as always)! Thank you!
Interesting take on the 18x20. Can't wait to try it out 😊
Upgraded intro is sickk!!!❤
Phenomenal attention to detail and context, Bravo🙏. I have had multiple V5 Blades for 5 years+, which has allowed me to benchmark different set-ups, My conclusion is that the Blade really improves greatly in all areas, especially in growing the sweet spot from adding weight to 3, 9 and 12 as long as you counterweight in the handle to maintain a 315mm to 325mm (strung) balance, even if you have to go above your normal preferred static weight you can add more weight to handle for a more head light balance, Also going up 2-4 pounds in string tension to help with controlling the extra power/plough this set up will deliver. I would highly recommend giving this a try.
Appreciate it! i shall give it a try, thanks for the tip 🙂
@@ACTennis BTW, This was done on the (16x19) racquets, I did this on a Blade V5 (18x20) which also improved the performance, I ended up missing the top cross making it an (18x19) which lifted the launch angle and pop slightly.
@@winniecarl Hey mate! May I ask how much lead/weight do you recommend adding to the Blades and where? Cheers! I currently have a V9 18x20 - SW came in at 328! Cheers!
Excellent reviews as always!
🙂
stellar review as always 🎾
You reviewing the new pure strike 16x19. Got the V9, but have always liked the pure strike.
I would like to, intend to, but my money is locked away in other frames until i can sell them off after i review them, Gen 3 was a deadly racquet 🙂
In your opinion, how different are the 18x20s (v9 vs v8)? Thanks!
Could you elaborate on the hidden spin potential of the strike you mentioned in the video? How can a racket that doesn’t move well on a vertical string path have high spin?
It's ability to generate spin doesnt solely rest on the manoeuvrability, rather ones skill to hit through aggressively, and even though it's a bit harder to do that with the Strike, it has very good spin potential , just watch how much Thiem used to get on his forehand with an 18x20 strike, but he did use the the G3 frame but custom with custom 70 stiffness layup (also probably why he got wrist injury lol)
Which one is better for clay court and High Altitude? 16x19 or 18x20
Best reviewer out there
Nice review!! Even tho we don’t have the same type of channel you are one of my biggest inspiration!🎾
Thanks for the support and kind words, i subbed - you have a different type of channel because you actually upload frequently haha, ill check out your videos! appreciate it
Hi! Just bought the Blade V9 18*20, but not yet played it. Going to compare it with my other rackets, Dunlop cx200 tour + tungsten in hoop, Yonex vcore 97D, Solinco whiteout 16x19, and Babolat pure Aero 98. They all feel great with each their own drawbacks. Best feel is Dunlop hands down. What is your take on this list AC?
Wow. Randomly got recommended this video, insane detail! Looking forward to more content from you brother. ❤
( We got the same style strokes so i am super excited to get on this channel)
Appreciate the support!
Off topic but with your improved technique would like to see you try the 93p again with a livelier poly like what Giron is using.
Definitely and a ton better now than i was at that time, also i was so injury ridden then aswell, dont think i could sum the money to buy it but i cant remember but i think i saw new phantoms on the horizon? we'll see how much they cost
My Blade v9 16x19 came in around 306g, fine balance, but 288 Swingweight unstrung. It was the best option out of the 7 the shop provided the specs from. Others were very close in SW, weight and balance. My setup now is:
With Diadem Pro X 1.20 @ 22kg, a few grams in the buttcap, Overgrip and Tourna dampener: 331g / 32.4balance (6HL) / SW I think 221 ( did this by hand so prone to errors. )
@@wackojumey You got a spec up my alley, id definitely play well with this one compared to the one i got in the vid, didnt suit me
Nr.1 review on Blade V.9 , wilson should take notes
Like your comparison charts. Any reason why you did not integrate a Yonex Percept 97, since it's also a control oriented frame (97, 97H or 97D)? Very curious to compare both.
I just decided to put everything a 98 on the charts , makes it simpler to think about, otherwise i can add every racquet possible
Excellent review, love the graphs! What racket would you recommend for a 4.0 all court player Blade V9 18x20, 16x19, ISO 305, 315, TFight 40, RF01, Radical MP, extreme MP, or something else? I currently play with vcore98 98 tour, it's erratic, too demanding for my 2h sessions.
You mention 330 SW is max for you. What is the specs of your Gravity Pro?Isn't it too hard to use for you?
@@martynasaleksonis4984 I have two, 328-330 SW, 327g 32.8cm balance, or if i reduce static weight, the SW is not as much of a problem, so 338 SW, 323g, 33.2cm balance
Just a question did they extend the handle grip long to the yoke
Lol no, still the same, i was gonna comment on it but video was too long already
Could you compare the new V9 pro to the normal model please?
I watched your review of the Blade Pro. Very well done. Do you prefer the Blade Pro over the regular Blade? And what string pattern would you choose?
@@chadallen3211 The Blade Pro feel is unbeatable, because its very true and original to no technology used, for Blade Pro id pick 18x20 because the 16x19 is very open, may lose out on some control
For v9, i could choose either pattern, but the only reason is choose 18x20 here because i think it feels plusher and nicer, also more direct control - but i may like the 16x19 for a bit more power and launch angle if i feel i need it
Great review, Thank you! What would you say is your favorite string setup?
Either Tru Pro Firewire Boost, or Alupwer - normally i dont like alupower because it's a bit too stiff for me, but in the sweetspot it was fine and a welcome addition due to the muted feel, being a more crisper playing poly
@@ACTennis Same experience. I find Alu Power a bit stiff in my Pro Staff 6.1 100, but in Blade v9 it's just right.
Great review. How would you compare both racquets to the Gravity Pro? Looking for a frame that's a bit more maneuverable as my Gravity Pro can sometimes feel a bit sluggish. Leaning towards getting the 18x20 version for the stability, but wanted to get your opinion on how the 16x19 would compare to the Gravity Pro as well. Thank you!
If you're looking for something with more Gravity like control and feel, it would be the 18x20, maybe get it at a bit lower swingweight around 326-328 area, that might give you some room to feel less cumbersome with it
Otherwise if you want a little more power and spin marginally, stability is pretty comparable for both, for me a head heavier blade is harder to swing than my Gravity Pro which i play almost stock specs
@@ACTennis Thank you for the reply! Yeah, I have a wrist issue and comfort is very important for me. Also wanted to ask about comfort as I am trying to figure out whether the better comfort of 18x20 that you mentioned in the review will "offset" the higher SW and put less of a strain on my wrist than the 16x19. Thanks in advance!
Love your OHBH! I also use one but not nearly as consistent. Currently using Whiteout 18x20. Wondering what you suggest for a 3.5-4.0 player with a OHBH to try?
Vcore 98 i think is a good OHBH racquet lol, sorry for late reply
@ thanks!
Would love to get your view on RF-01 Pro vs Blade Pro!
Great video! How about the Pro Staff 97 v14? Have you try it?
I did try it, only a demo, it was a crazy spec, swingweight was 345 lol, so i cant accurately provide feedback
Hi, I currently have the V5 blade, but you are saying the V9 is not better? So i may as well find the V5 again.
In my opinion yep, the v9 feel is no the best, v5 feel is one of the best if not the best one out of the generations
Have you spent some more time with the 18x20? If so, any string setups you recommend trying? Thanks!
Nah i demoed this one but it was easy to hit enough to get a good idea of how it plays over a week, since i'm directly coming off using the 16x19 version, so i never bought 18x20, but if i were to buy one of the two, would be the 18x20
After watching this review, feel like the tfight 305 is a very good racket, very all rounded just like the ezone. Is the tfight very difficult to play with?
Yeah, the specs do not come out very user friendly, your best chance is to buy a very low swingweight one, and technically it doesnt play as well as it would with its general heavy specs, but still plays pretty well
Amazing reviews!!! Could you advise the position for Speed Pro Aux 1.0 in the chart?
I have a review on the Speed Pro , check out Battle of the Titans Round 3 - it will give you all the ratings in the same manner 🙂
@@ACTennis
I found it! Appreciate!
What is your final setup for Blade 18x20? I like the old one with leather grip. Thanks for your review.
For me it was only a demo, but felt pretty good as it it was, leather might have helped , but i prefer lower static weight overall
How monstrous of a racket is the Tfight iso 305, nearly at the top of every category with the exception of maneuverability ? Is it really that good ...?
Lol unfortunately that one category is its biggest downfall and a big one, actually head heavy balance passed 0 pts, but IMO yes its very good
@@ACTennis10 gms to the lowest portion of the handle and it’s 3 points head light in the least. But then it becomes a 315 gms unstrung pro racket.
what a great review.. exactly what I was looking for.. my ears were deceiving me a bit hearing the 18x20 portion but for some reason I gravitate to denser string patterns like the Strike 18x20 and the old hated countervail 18x20.. mine broke at the throat and it's left a hole in my options.. but I've been playing with the strike 18x20 so if the Blade V9 is indeed that impressive I might skip the 16x19 that I had my eyes on.. coming from the Yonex side I still use the older Ezone Xi 98 which is stiffer and haven't ever like many of the newer versions (ai was a lot of peoples favorite for awhile before the dr's).. but I do like the vcore 98, and the plus ezones are ok not great.
I played with Kyrgios's Xi for a little bit, loads of power and spin, very fun
Blade 18x20 will probably be dependent on swingweight for performance, i have a bit of a reluctance to think it will perform the same. way without at least a decent swingweight
@@ACTennis completely makes sense, I added weight to the handle and some long lead strips to the xi long ago @ 3/9 and never looked back, stock form I probably wouldn't do for the yonex, maybe also why I haven't always liked the AI or DR as much.. but anything in 325-low 330s range usually is welcomed.. I guess thin beam faster racquets to me are more enjoyable but with still having some heft. Pure Strike v1 16x19 I have is setup similar to the ezone Xi.
Hey mate, do you know of any Australian retailers that measure swing weight? or is my best bet to get a low static weight hoping that it means low SW? Want a strike 98 16x19 2024 with a sub 330 SW (325ish)
Tennis only Richmond , or Tennis warehouse Australia have swingweight machines, not sure if the 2nd one will premeasure for you before you buy, but Tennisonly will
I want one of those too haha
If you have no options, you need to find the lowest static weight with the most headlight balance
Tennis warehouse Australia used to be accommodating to wanting a specific spec a few years ago, but they told me last year they are no longer measuring racquets for clients (unless I got in contact with a staff member that CBF). I know tennis only will take requests for static weights, didn't know they would for swing weight. Thanks.@@ACTennis
@@ashton2410 It has to be the retail store though, not the online store, Melbourne one has a swingweight machine , not sure about the new NSW merger one - call the Melbourne one they should usually assist
V9 all have foam inside the handle ?
I cant speak for all v9s , but a couple ive so far seem to , so best guess is yes
I’m still loving my 18x20 v8s. The feel and cupping are fantastic. Nonetheless I agree is a tough racquet to buy if you (1) want to play it at stock specs and (2) don’t have access to a swingweight machine /customization. Mine are all bang on 313gr 31.6cm and 295sw. Unstrung ra 62-64.
Difficult to go wrong with any Blade as long as it's manageable for your style of game
What a review!! How do you think the noir blade compares to the v9?
Im looking at the Blade 98 and 100 , 16x19… As a 4.0 senior singles player with a ohb and good touch, the 100 might suit me better. TW has some V8 100’s available; the V9 hasn’t come in yet. Is the V9 100 worth waiting for? And does the 100 best fit my ability… Thanks, John
Not worth to wait for the v9 blade 100 as the v8 plays more than fine, solid in all categories and not sure about most people but i found one hander is very good because it was lighter than the 98 but could plow through the ball
@@ACTennis I’ve been trying the Ezone 98…. My elbow seems to be developing some sensitivity… I don’t know if it’s me or the racquet. I may send it back and go for the Blade 100…or the Blade 98 16 x 19 v9..I had to add this edit… your analysis is right on..awesome video…I don’t like to screw around with customization..rather go with stock, but I will work with TW to get spec or below spec… I string my racquets with champions choice hybrid ( gut in mains at 55 or 53; poly in cross at 52 or 50)…
id love to see your thoughts compairg the 18x20 to other 18x20s that you enjoy. (especially gravity pro)
At same spec how Much do you feel difference in sweetspot beteende 16 19 18 20 ? And do you consider 18 20 be A harder raquet to play with ?
I think that the sweetspot was slightly more forgiving on the 18x20 actually, because it plays alot softer, and a bit more stable for some reason at a similar spec
It was easier for me only because the balance was better on the quality control, if it was same balance then probably not
Excellent review as always. So are you saying that the sweetspot in upper part of hoop for 18x20 is better/not harsh with no dead spot. with the v8, putting lead at 10&2 seemed to help with this. more consistent stringbed is why I usually get the blade in 18m. thanks again for vid
It didnt disappear, but because it was softer and the stability was also noticeably better, it helped, but i cant add weight to the tip personally due to my weak ass not being able to handle above 330 SW lol
Hi! Im attacker player using full-western grip with a lot of generative spin.
Do you recommend the 16x19 or the 18x20? Currently playing with the shift 300 16x20 and love it! Looking to get an advanced racket so the blade on the spot for me.
@@noynizri7860 Nothing wrong with the shift, probably suits your game better than a Blade - Blade will take away alot of your spin which is probably weaponized - i would stick with something that enhances your strengths if you already like it, dont force a change for no reason - but if youre looking to have fun, then try the 16x19 , 18x20 will be too closed for you probably
How do you find it compares overall to the v7? I currently use V7s and enjoy them, but am interested in making the switch.
If you are more concerned with the feel, the racquet flexes a less i.e bending sensation but still offers that a similar impact feel, i think v7 probably plays more forgiving though just because its so soft , i need to adjust my ratings since i reviewed my v7 very eatly on my rating scales
That opening montage tho!
I agree with the Ezone 98 as the greatest serving racquet for a 98 sq inch racquet, its almost like a pure drive 100.
I’ve been playing 9 months with shift pro and can’t get use to higher launch angle on FH and acknowledge my style is for flatter shots. Is it worth going towards blade v9 18x20 or going back to my previous Wilson 98 v6 CV 18x20? Cheers Russ
Whatever you feel more comfortable with, maybe less powerful than a CV, but alot more comfortable, if that's what you look for in a change for your Blade, it could be the right in that sense
got my v9 (16x19) today now I am returning it and will be buying the 18x20 version
Haha that was fast, didn't want to give it a go?
Do you have any plans to try the new Dunlop CX line too ? It has great reviews and it’s a line close to the racquets you enjoy.
I have a CX 400 Tour for a few weeks now, but havent had time to play with him, just one short hit so far ,will get to it at some point
@@ACTennis please give me a sneak peak. In terms of feel and ball connection is it close or better than blade ? Give me something :P
Looking forward to cx400T review @ACTennis
@@TheodorosKolokotronis799 NGL first hit fresh strings T1 BK actually hurt lol, i played again once the strings really settled in just by leaving it there, then i started to gel with it pretty well - atm it it seemed to feel similar to the current FX line, the FX 98 Tour anyway, which i wasn't all that impressed by - but performance wise it seemed so far so good
@@ACTennis I didn’t not enjoy fx 98 tour. Good power, great stability but the feel was kinda muted. So from your answer i suppose you prefer v9 right now ?
Top notch review! Love the extensive comparison with other racquets too! What’s your current comp/tournament racquet?
Gravity Pro and ISO 305 as a second along with Aero 98
did you make the switch or are you still using the Gravity Pro?
Still with the Gravity Pro 🙂
What is your swingweight on your gravity pro and on your iso?
About 330 for both
I use yonex v core pro 97 currently. Find it too dead and no pop. Should I switch to this?
@@SaqibSheikh Try the Percept 100D, Blade 100, or yeah if you want a 98, this could do
wilson blade V9+hyper G (solinco) compensa a falta de spin e se torna uma arma mortal ! thanks!
Would you pick v9 or extreme pro ?and why briefly thanks
Blade better suited to my game, as i prefer to aggressively flatten out, extreme pro wont be so good at putting away the ball
@ so now v9 is your main stick ? From your description prestige fits you
@@curiousgeorge6921 Never switched racquets since Gravity Pro
from ur review it seem u hit pretty good with it, what make ur racquet of choice better than this one?
I'm quite adaptable to most racquets as long as i can swing them, but even still i usually will just find the best way i can manage it - gravity pro has the control of the v9 18x20 but alot more power than both string patterns, as well as more spin and more forgiving
Have you ever reviewed the Wilson Blade Pro 98 v9 16x19?
@@chadallen3211 It's gonna be mostly the same as v8, v7 , have the video on the v7
@@ACTennis I'll have to find that video. Thanks
@@chadallen3211 If you search Blade Pro AC Tennis it should come up
What does the "d" in d beam stand for?
Doesn't really stand for anything, it refers to the actual shape of the racquet, so its flat on the inside and rounds out on the outside, D with a capital letter is probably what is refers to
On contrary Pro Staff is a box beam, where its just very rectangular / squared off at the edges
Hey mate! Insane review, once again! Sounds like you preferred the Yonex Regna 98 over this one, how would you compare them? Cheers
Blade has more top end power in big swings, higher launch angle, less penetrating spin, better for flat attacking shots - Regna is consistent, has nicer quality feel / feedback, plays nicer for OHBH, both serve well and probably more unforgiving at the same tension, but plays much better at lower tensions
Superb review, thanks! Whats ur racquet of choice?
Thanks alot - i use the Gravity Pro 2019 / 2021 versions
@@ACTennishi allen . Whatz string and tensio you use this racket gravity pro? Is okay gravity pro 2023 to buy?
Thanks ❤
@@indragazali I use Volkl Vsquare 1.20mm and TruPro Ghostwire 1.22mm , 48lbs
You will lose alot of natural power on Gravity if you switch from Ezone 100, its good for the arm, but hard to use
If you really have arm issues, Clash V2 100 is not a bad racquet, i like it actually, plenty of power and comfort
I am curious. Speed 3s or court ff 3 and why ? ❤
I much preferred court ff2, it was lower to ground but all the stability with enough comfort and didnt feel overly heavy - court ff3 feels heavy and chunky, i dont feel as coordinated with them
speed 3s are more between speed 2s and gel res, didnt feel like 2s were stable enough for what i wanted, but the 3s seem to have made it more sturdy and rigid but still keeping it light
@@ACTennis yeah court 3 are very rigid. They feel like they don’t give you freedom to move. Funny thing they play awesome on clay. They suck on hard court. Speed 3s reminded me of a lighter closer to the ground vapor x. They are fast but 2s were more cushioned. Your opinion on resolution 9 ?
I am hunting reviews all day for at least 2 weeks now but i just discovered this ge(m)ntleman. Thanks for the contect and luckily we have similar style of play, so i am really lucky to have found you. Really considering this racket. Time for me to buy my second racket after around 17 years with the 106sq in nblade (v1 i guess) 😅
Hope it works out for you 😁
@@ACTennis To be honest i played a few balls with prestige pro and fell in love with the buttery feel and precision. So i really consider prestige mp l which i can handle and maybe customize. Thank you for your content again!! Wish the best for you! 🙏
Hi, what would you choose between PA 98 and blade v9 18x20 to win a match and why?
This is really a playstyle question and not one i hope you will follow because of what i prefer lol - both are great racquets - i would play better with Blade 18x20 because i attack flat and aggressive more often and the tighter pattern will give me that extra control on big shots to hit very tight targeting, also will be faster for me to serve with, more plush and comfortable for long term arm health, and better suited for 1 hander in terms of shape and feel
What about the second serves with Blade 18x20 and defensive shots ?
Great review.
I love V6, counter-veil generation, too, though it was not popular.
How do you feel v9 compared to V6?
Probably safer for overall arm health, v6 countervail might be hiding the stiffness only, rather than actually being comfortable , ive had to go through alot more tennis elbow and wrist issues since i used it, and for how i am now, id rather be safe than sorry - but performance wise they are both good, v6 is just gonna be more powerful
Where would you add weight to 16 19?
If my spec was around 325 and i felt the need, probably 10&2 to see if i could make it a bit more forgiving in the upper
why is this not suited for whippy swings?
Saw another review that said V9 produces a lot of spin…. So hard to know what will apply to you. But Good review.
All racquets can produce spin, but predominantly is on users abolity - IMO alot of people mistaken spin for margin (height) of the arc over the net, you can get the ball to bounce high on most shots, but how heavy is the actual rotations is what matters
Blades are flat playing racquets, always have been, precision is the key, and some spin is there if you are good enough to access it
Great review! It seems the blade is just an ezone 98 with better feel and slightly worse spin haha
Haha i guess you could say that - they are in technicality competing racquets
backhand is NICE
Have you played the V8 and V9 customized to the same specs to see if your opinions hold?
played with V8 98 16x19 , 324 SW, 32.6cm balance, 330g with overgrip and dampener, alupower 1.25mm @ 46 for a couple sessions right before i bought the V9
What are your v5 specs? W/B/SW
Wasn't mine, but specs were roughly 324 sw 324g around 32.8cm
Nice!
Do the new pure strike gen 4 next!
Looking to get my hands on it eventually
So 2015 blade still best essentially?
Essentially but unless you already have some, its a little harder to come by if you want a few of them, and in new condition
@@ACTennis yeah they're very hard to come by in my country. Which one out of v7, v8 and v9 would you recommend. I know it's tough v8 is anemic etc I've played with a v7 and it definitely needed a stiffer shaped poly like a lux original rough played great. I'm interested in v9 vs v7 comparison cheers
@@revio000 Its kind of like a v7 , but there is less bending sensation, maybe v7 feels more forgiving because its so soft, but because the 18x20 is also, then it becomes quite similar - i wouldnt say they are that far different other than feel, playability of blades tend to be all the same with minor tweaks herr and there to feel and swingweight
Interesting I find the radical mp to be quite more forgiving than the v9.
May depend on stroke style, but i only gave it a couple points different so its not significant either way
@@ACTennis I guess many things are a bit subjective and everyone perception is different. Anyway love the review! My radical mp aux is my racquet of choice but I also like to play around with the v9 from time to time! :)
Would you prefer the 18x20 to the blade 100 in a match? Also, how would you rank it in a match against the ezone 98 and iso?
Great video btw, super insightful.
If i could only pick one, probably. 18x20 blade because i am ultra aggressive in matches, i need as much control as possible, but its also slighter thinner beam so its faster at the same specs - also i like the plushness, it jives with my game because i already use the gravity pro which would be in the same ball park of pocketing and feel
Same against Ezone and ISO, it may be a vanilla safe choice because it has the similar density to my current main, but the serving would be an upgrade and comparable enough to the ezone but better for my grohndstrokes - ISO is helpful because of its spin generation, but due to the head heaviness it would be a less safe option for me - its more of a trump card
@@rubinsingh4779 Whatever you feel best with mate, maybe find a demo if speed mp, i thought that speed pro and mpnmoved pretty well with the one hander if you got it headlight enough
Your hitting partner is very consistent and has good footwork. What is she playing with??
Vcore 98, over the years we switched around from Blade v7, Ezone 98, Speed MP 2022 and to this, really suits her style and strokes, so no more switching
It would be super interesting to many if she did a Blade 100 v8 vs v9 comparison, she plays great. I've long thought that girls and women don't get nearly enough consideration in racquet reviews, and Blade 100 is massively 'endorsed' on WTA tour. If you could find a Steam 100 to compare too, that would be fabulous, and super useful to so many junior girls and young competitors @@ACTennis
She is cute.
Speed pro being a 1820 is very easy to get spin compared to the gravity tour I've tried. Nevertheless, speed pro is 100 head size so it's not a complete surprise. However, Blade 98 1820 is surprisingly easy to play compared to other 1820 I've tried in a 98 head size.
I liked it quite alot, would totally buy it once i free up some of my other racquets
@@ACTennis I couldn't resist and bought a 16*19. The unstrung SW is about 290. With 1.25 ALU Power it's about 320 SW. Do you know the unstrung SW of your 16*19? I find mine a bit unstable unless I absolutely hit the sweet spot. I like the current SW though. So I'm not sure whether I should add maybe 2g at 3&9 and get used to the added SW or just work on hitting the sweet spot more accurately.
@@fluffy_skye Mine was 300, add up to 324 sw strung match and youll be in perfect spot for a Blade 16x19
@@ACTennis Thanks for the advice. I added 2.5g at 3&9. The SW goes up to 325. It feels too head heavy so I countered with 3.7g along the handle. It's now 329g, 325SW. Best racket I've used.
Prefer blade retail or pro?
I like Blade Pro, obviously has all the merits to it for a reason, personally for me i would play better with a Blade, and for the lower swingweight
Have you heard anything on the grapevine about the 18X19 version?
As much as everyone else, i.e potentially a small batch only for specific regions, or probably just none at all because it wouldnt make sense for a company to sell 3 string patterns - i am possibly about to get my hands on Kordas personal racquet, so it will tell me if its even close to the layup of the current gen blades or not
My Regna 98 be scoring off the charts, hmmm.
You know it 🙂
Can someone tell me not to by the V9 pro
If you have the other versions, then no lol
@@ACTennis only one I have is the V5 and that still feels pretty good
Weird, there is a dislike button but like button is missing?? Anyway I did like it as its a fantastic review but what about the 100?
I didn't buy it, but i have played with the demos of v8 and v9 for long enough to understand it, might consider as next video
This is Australia? I was expecting more man-sized venomous insects!
Thats why peopke shouldn't complain about too headlight balance. Impossible to reduce swingweight, but possible to increase with incremental lead additions at 12 o clock.
It's my preferred but not for everyone, i think mostly the problem is when you receive one with like 310 swingweight, then it becomes a little lame
the qc of the blade is ridiculous. a 330 SW on this racquet makes it impossible to judge.
I think most Blades (proper spec) are going to be like this, since one with correct weight and balance looks to be about mid to higher 320s, i got a tiny bit unlucky, but on the rare ocassion i could not premeasure
@@ACTennis To me the constant trade off for the Blade is maneuverability vs. power. But then, I can't handle a SW over 324.
@@petershort936 Tried Blade 100?
@@ACTennis I haven't. It's funny, ever since I left the Gravity Tour behind for 98s, I've found myself really sensitive to drag. 98s with 23mm or higher and 100s just feel slow in the air to me. I can do tapered beams on 98s, but not a constant 23mm beam. I have found Radical MP and PA98 to be sufficiently maneuverable.
I'm sorry, I had to take the Wilson claims on QC with a pinch of salt and a massive dose of LMAO .... The joke is still on the consumer. Buy at own Risk.
Pretty much gonna be like that with all brands maybe aside from Yonex
I do appreciate your detailed review, but not a fan of that camera work. It makes me too dizzy to watch because court is rotating while you are hitting, and I could not concentrate on what you are actually saying about the racquet.
330 Swingweight max is a tremendously low bar to be a truly comprehensive racket reviewer IMHO
Kind of doesn't make much sense if almost all racquets currently don't come in over a 335 swingweight - how many viewers would you say are beyond a 5.0 level?
Needing to add copious amount of lead to fix the flaws of a racquet is rather cheating if anything
Same logic would apply that Medvedev isn't deserving to be a top #3 player because he uses a 327 swingweight