Well done Matt. It is so true that you have to think outside of the box. It really shows that can't have enough Start-2-Finish examples to drive a point home.
Matt, another great video. "Put down that brush !" I needed this. I want to compliment your bird photography, another level ! Just started shooting birds this year and it's a lot harder than it looks !
That was brilliant! We are all guilty of trying to do the “correct thing” and don't take the time to explore the “what ifs” and find a process that actually works better! Well done.
Just cleaned up the bleed between the wingtips of flying ducks using subtract sky. IT WORKED!!!!!!! Those BIF shots are going to be rescued. Thanks Matt.
Great presentation. I dove into bird photography a year ago and these methods of masking will save a lot of time. I appreciate you sharing your expertise.
Wow, this is a neat way of doing it. Being South African I naturally shoot wildlife 🐆🦁🦓🦏🐘🦅🦉very regularly. I've always just used the brush on my wildlife photos which can become very tedious. Using the select sky or select background or color range looks like a much faster way of doing it Thanks Matt
G’day, Matt. I’ve been following you off and on for what must be over 10 years. I’m loving you’re latest videos. They’re realistic. So often you see someone should a technique, try it, and only to find that it doesn’t work on your photo. Because they’ve used the perfect photo to show off the technique. But you’re showing real world examples. As a wildlife, mainly birds (osprey) and landscape photographers I’ve really appreciating your videos. Thank you.
Another excellent video. Also great philosophy: it doesn't have to be perfect! I hate to think how many hours (days? months?) I've spent trying to mask something perfectly that, in the end, was not needed.
Thank you so very much, the wing tips of Red Kites have been driving me crazy, I was attempting, badly, to use the brush 😂 now using background and/or Sky it’s fixed, life saver, or sanity saver 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Cheers Matt 👍🏼
This is a really good tutorial. I never thought about using the Subtract from mask feature like this! Thanks Matt! (Enjoying your “Inside the Composition” course a lot, almost done!)
Perfect I like to see more workarounds .. just like intersect which is missing in Lightroom, for example use sky mask and subtract with linear gradient then invert that would fix it
Thanks Matt for the linear gradient subtract tip! Really helpful in my landscapes. And when were you in Ridgway...based on that quick pic in PS of chimney rock and court house :) 😃 👌
Thanks so much Matt. I was editing a similar image of an Osprey and had the same issue with the wing tips. Choosing "subtract" worked a treat. BTW what would you do with the other wing tip in your example as there is did not work so well there probably due to the green foliage there?
Well Matt, you must deal with those fairly new to editing (LR/PS), at least with RUclips. It must get a little exhausing, how do you stay challenged? Maintain cutting edge work?
Thanks Matt. I've got to ask, is that LR the latest version? What with the way the masking tools work. I think I am one iteration back and it won't run on Mac OS running Catalina.
"Good enough" is actually be "great": I think "perfection" when masking is actually not the way to go, because if you try to perfectly mask you will get "hard" edges and probably a fake look since it will look like a cutout. When masking I often try to feather en let the images have natural edge "blending" so that it feels real or natural.
All these fancy auto selections in many cases are still weaker than the classic channel pulling, IMHO. In the last example ALL the grass could be easily selected via the channels. 😉
Not even close, but if it works for you, great. But there is no way channels are better with today's modern tools. (And that's coming from a fan of channel selections way back)
@@MattKloskowski channels and the Pen tool are my best friends for masking, though I assume the development of the technology, on the 2nd image it did a good job
Развлечения
Thanks for reminding us that we don't need to be perfect. Makes editing more fun and relaxing.
Well done Matt. It is so true that you have to think outside of the box. It really shows that can't have enough Start-2-Finish examples to drive a point home.
Matt, another great video. "Put down that brush !" I needed this. I want to compliment your bird photography, another level ! Just started shooting birds this year and it's a lot harder than it looks !
Matt, your videos are always flipping amazing. I love finding out how to use LRC better than what I have previously known.
Really excellent video Matt! You just 💥 my mind. There are always more ways to skin the cat. Thanks!
That was brilliant! We are all guilty of trying to do the “correct thing” and don't take the time to explore the “what ifs” and find a process that actually works better! Well done.
This is the second video where watching you use the feathered edge of the brush taught me and reinforced a new technique.
Very useful Matt, keep them coming
Excellent. I've been editing with these tools for a long time and never thought of what you just demonstrated. Thank you.
Excellent teaching, Matt! The techniques you taught are extremely helpful!
Matt, simply brilliant! Thanks a lot for sharing.
Your tutorials are awesome! Always something new to learn and very well explained. A big thank you.
Love it! Thank you. "work smarter NOT harder".
Thank you! You are always a helping hand!
Great demo and advice Matt. I agree with not trying to be perfect since it would be so hard to achieve, and may look edited. Feathering is my friend.
Wow, great video !!!!! So many great ideas !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just cleaned up the bleed between the wingtips of flying ducks using subtract sky. IT WORKED!!!!!!! Those BIF shots are going to be rescued. Thanks Matt.
Fantastic. Just what I needed to clear up my confusion. Thanks Matt!
Great presentation. I dove into bird photography a year ago and these methods of masking will save a lot of time. I appreciate you sharing your expertise.
Thanks for sharing these great tips🙏🏼🙏🏼
Thanks Matt great ideas and great video. I will definitely be using theses tools more.
Very well done, Matt. Thank you.
Wow, this is a neat way of doing it. Being South African I naturally shoot wildlife 🐆🦁🦓🦏🐘🦅🦉very regularly.
I've always just used the brush on my wildlife photos which can become very tedious.
Using the select sky or select background or color range looks like a much faster way of doing it
Thanks Matt
Thanks Matt, very clearly explained as always!
Awesome tutorial! Learnt some new ways in masking! ❤
G’day, Matt. I’ve been following you off and on for what must be over 10 years. I’m loving you’re latest videos. They’re realistic. So often you see someone should a technique, try it, and only to find that it doesn’t work on your photo. Because they’ve used the perfect photo to show off the technique. But you’re showing real world examples. As a wildlife, mainly birds (osprey) and landscape photographers I’ve really appreciating your videos. Thank you.
Thanks Bill. That's the world of RUclips unfortunately. I appreciate your comment though and I do try to find real world photos with real world use.
always great information Matt
The gradient trick is awesome!
Amazing. This was brilliantMuch needed necessary skills well presented and easily understood. Thank you.
Good video! The color range mask is awesome!
Thanks for this lesson! This is great!
really interesting Matt, thank you made think differently about the mask tool
Another excellent video. Also great philosophy: it doesn't have to be perfect! I hate to think how many hours (days? months?) I've spent trying to mask something perfectly that, in the end, was not needed.
Great tutorial - super helpful- thanks!
thank you! excellent information and attitude! ♥
Excellent, helpful video. Thanks.
Thank you so very much, the wing tips of Red Kites have been driving me crazy, I was attempting, badly, to use the brush 😂 now using background and/or Sky it’s fixed, life saver, or sanity saver 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Cheers Matt 👍🏼
This is a really good tutorial. I never thought about using the Subtract from mask feature like this! Thanks Matt! (Enjoying your “Inside the Composition” course a lot, almost done!)
Glad it was helpful!
GENIOUS!!! Solved my problem!!!!
GREAT INFO!! THANKS FOR SHARING!!!🙏🙏🙏
Perfect I like to see more workarounds .. just like intersect which is missing in Lightroom, for example use sky mask and subtract with linear gradient then invert that would fix it
Gr8 as always
Quite thoughtful..
Thanks for a great video
Thanks Matt! I needed these ideas to subtract!
Happy to help!
Thanks for an informative video!
This is a great video tip
Excellent 👌
Thanks Matt for the linear gradient subtract tip! Really helpful in my landscapes. And when were you in Ridgway...based on that quick pic in PS of chimney rock and court house :) 😃 👌
Thanks..
Thanks so much Matt. I was editing a similar image of an Osprey and had the same issue with the wing tips. Choosing "subtract" worked a treat. BTW what would you do with the other wing tip in your example as there is did not work so well there probably due to the green foliage there?
Very useful ideas! Question: with all of the new masking options in LR, where is the line on when one is better off going to Photoshop? Thanks.
it must be a new feature but you can select clothes now
Thank you, very much.
You are welcome!
Thanks....
What's your system specification
Well Matt, you must deal with those fairly new to editing (LR/PS), at least with RUclips. It must get a little exhausing, how do you stay challenged? Maintain cutting edge work?
can you use masks from lightroom/acr in photoshop for eg. compositions?
Thanks Matt. I've got to ask, is that LR the latest version? What with the way the masking tools work. I think I am one iteration back and it won't run on Mac OS running Catalina.
Hi. This is the version released in October of 2022. Thanks.
Couldn’t you also select auto mask with the brush when subtracting? It would help with the edges.
Sure. Give it a try.
I think the subject selection tools could go to an entirely new level if radius or feather was avail.
I'm sure it will. Give it time. It's barely 18 months old, so I'm sure we have a long way to go.
"Good enough" is actually be "great":
I think "perfection" when masking is actually not the way to go, because if you try to perfectly mask you will get "hard" edges and probably a fake look since it will look like a cutout. When masking I often try to feather en let the images have natural edge "blending" so that it feels real or natural.
All these fancy auto selections in many cases are still weaker than the classic channel pulling, IMHO.
In the last example ALL the grass could be easily selected via the channels. 😉
Not even close, but if it works for you, great. But there is no way channels are better with today's modern tools. (And that's coming from a fan of channel selections way back)
@@MattKloskowski channels and the Pen tool are my best friends for masking, though I assume the development of the technology, on the 2nd image it did a good job
Thank
you Matt! Great methods on masking problem areas in Lightroom.