I never thought to make Boolean operations directly in the slicer, that is a really interesting way to make interlocking parts easily! I'm pretty sure there are many other uses for that, great tutorial! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Very cool! Thanks for making the STL available. Any chance you have just the two clip-parts separate to use in other projects? I'm subscribing. Keep it up!
Hi! The boolean part has been designed a bit bigger. It has tight tolerance but it fits my towel clip perfectly! 🙂 I can try and let me know how it goes! Cheers!
The infill density is quite different for all three slicers. Orca was set for 15%, Prusa 5%, Cura 20%. And we have no information about layer thicknesses neither.
@@peterkiss1204 see you say that, but I've sliced the same things with the same settings and had the same time variance as that (and then the parts don't even look good coming out of Cura), so clearly it's not just the infill and layer heights SoonerLater
@@peterkiss1204 like I said, I've compared multiple as well, no reason to fiddle with something when the other one works better out of the box. Not to mention the slicing algorithms are just better in literally anything else in general
@@Irek_Poland the stl for the negative operation is designed to provide a nice latch with a satisfying snap and to be as easy to print as possible. Not to mention that if you use the springy bit on the clip to do the boolean it won’t work because of zero tolerance 😉
Very nice! I haven't played with this functionality before, but this is really useful. Thanks for the vid!
@@JoeSchmoe-lq1uo cool! Glad you liked it!
I never thought to make Boolean operations directly in the slicer, that is a really interesting way to make interlocking parts easily! I'm pretty sure there are many other uses for that, great tutorial! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thank you! 😁 Slicers are getting more an more powerful...
nice!! new subscriber here looking forward for more tutorials please keep going!
Hey, thank you for subscribing! I will try my best to keep posting this kind of content!
Very cool! Thanks for making the STL available. Any chance you have just the two clip-parts separate to use in other projects? I'm subscribing. Keep it up!
Hey! Sure, I'll try and see if I can do it in the next few days 👍
Done! You should bbe able to download it now.
@@IL3D Brilliant, thanks!!!! Looking forward (subscribing) to more builds, videos, files, etc!
Isn’t it to tight? I would slightly upscale the boolean part beforehand.
Hi! The boolean part has been designed a bit bigger. It has tight tolerance but it fits my towel clip perfectly! 🙂 I can try and let me know how it goes! Cheers!
an hour vs an hour 30 for cura...the fork does cura still exist for...
The infill density is quite different for all three slicers. Orca was set for 15%, Prusa 5%, Cura 20%. And we have no information about layer thicknesses neither.
@@peterkiss1204 see you say that, but I've sliced the same things with the same settings and had the same time variance as that (and then the parts don't even look good coming out of Cura), so clearly it's not just the infill and layer heights SoonerLater
@@TS_Mind_Swept I'm using multiple slicers and can get pretty similar results. If you don't then you probably can't set your slicers up properly...
@@peterkiss1204 like I said, I've compared multiple as well, no reason to fiddle with something when the other one works better out of the box. Not to mention the slicing algorithms are just better in literally anything else in general
Nie rozumiem. Zmieniasz na część negatywną oba elementy?
Przecież tylko zatrzask trzeba zmienić na negatywny.
@@Irek_Poland the stl for the negative operation is designed to provide a nice latch with a satisfying snap and to be as easy to print as possible. Not to mention that if you use the springy bit on the clip to do the boolean it won’t work because of zero tolerance 😉