Is the Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167 worth $50,000?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024

Комментарии • 119

  • @astrafalustre8259
    @astrafalustre8259 3 года назад +25

    Is it worth it ? Of course no, but it's fun to observe the way Patek do business. Clever guys.

  • @FightingMango
    @FightingMango 3 года назад +21

    Thanks for a more up to date review guys. I was extremely lucky and ordered mine back in 2018 and received it in 2019 (with bracelet and rubber) and have absolutely not regretted getting it. I love it. However if people could stop asking to buy it, that would be nice :D

  • @TheRomyaz
    @TheRomyaz 3 года назад +24

    It represents the globe with all its coordinates and time zones (navigation)

    • @marcb92vjacques26
      @marcb92vjacques26 3 года назад

      very good humour !

    • @Guenounovitch
      @Guenounovitch 3 года назад +3

      It’s a stupid grenade

    • @jimmylight4866
      @jimmylight4866 10 месяцев назад

      BS it's obviously a 50k Swiss hand grenade flexing it's neutrality.

  • @MA-xf2lu
    @MA-xf2lu 3 года назад +12

    Beautiful contemporary timepiece... I have one in my collection and i have found it so versatile due to its simplicity.. Great review, thank you

  • @tockingwatches2377
    @tockingwatches2377 3 года назад +6

    I’m fortunate that I have a 5167-1A coming in this year plus a separate clasp for the additional rubber strap.

  • @pete6705
    @pete6705 Год назад +2

    Yup, it’s a stainless steel and rubber watch, and a simple, basic design. The price seems absolutely insane. But on the other hand, for reasons I can’t fully explain, I absolutely love it.

  • @Tonysoprano497
    @Tonysoprano497 3 года назад +14

    There’s the problem that guys want to get into Patek but they are not really into high horology instead they just think it’s the brand to have .Why are people so desperate to buy a sports watch from essentially a non sports watch company ? We must presume it’s driven by two things the name on the dial and the possibility of profit . As they are unattainable it’s highly unlikely that anyone will get close to purchasing.. Ive know two people who have owned the nautilus purchased at list when this was possible , they weren’t impressed and felt that there was far better at the price ..
    I think there is a real problem within the watch community.. many people seem more interested in trophy pieces as opposed to buying what they really love and that’s a pity ..

    • @dillonhudson1440
      @dillonhudson1440 3 года назад

      instablaster...

    • @jaychu3850
      @jaychu3850 3 года назад

      That’s everything 🤦🏻‍♂️…. These few brands and models are also great investments.

    • @jimmylight4866
      @jimmylight4866 5 дней назад

      Maybe people are more interested in trophies.

  • @scottbrandon9390
    @scottbrandon9390 3 года назад +29

    Most of these Swiss watches are not worth the retail price. The problem is the price is driven up by social media influencers and celebrities. Ultimately, the Aquanaut will get $50,000 (or more) because someone is willing to pay that price. If this model was a dud and no one wanted it, the price would be $10,000.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 года назад +4

      It costs money to run a brand and to produce things completely in house. It is priced exactly what the market dictates.
      Is a Bentley too expensive? Or an apartment in NYC.

    • @Seti12345
      @Seti12345 2 года назад +1

      By your logic the Rolex Cellini should retail at 5k because nobody wants it but it still retails at 20,000+ because they cant let it devalue the brand

    • @tdb4763
      @tdb4763 Год назад +1

      I got it for 3

  • @rickjason215
    @rickjason215 3 года назад +11

    No. Nice watch. Only complication is the date. 50 grand is crazy.

  • @chrisp5526
    @chrisp5526 3 года назад +6

    Interesting, I thought the stainless steel could be bought for $25K; I didn’t realize it’s difficult to find.
    My thoughts on ‘is something worth it’: It is worth it if I can buy it and not stress the buying/service/repair cost, and I would greatly enjoy what I buy.
    -so for me, any Patek Philippe is not worth it for me, at this time in my life, even if it was $25K…. that’s a lot of money for a watch.

    • @mainstreetbully6814
      @mainstreetbully6814 Год назад

      You’re correct 25k is the list price… these guys are just scumbag grey market dealers

  • @jeremydahm2124
    @jeremydahm2124 2 года назад +13

    Very cool on the rubber but not even worth the 21,600 retail. The movement is beautifully finished and elegantly thin. But as a functional piece, movement,watch, any Omega, Rolex....is more accurate and can be set accurately. Certainly Rolex.

    • @johnthomas424
      @johnthomas424 2 года назад +1

      I totally agree. I myself just left a comment and a must-see video from another RUclipsr.

  • @joseluissobral8751
    @joseluissobral8751 2 года назад +3

    I own a gold Aquanaut and it is a masterpiece.

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 3 года назад +4

    The retail price STILL IS $25k.Thats the real price for an Aquanaut from Patek. However, due to a true limited production more likely will not get one from an AD. The used market (even if it’s unworn) will be $50k. When we talk about Patek. Patek does not like or agree with grey market dealers. That part of the watch industry cheapens the brand name. They know it takes away from that special luxury VIP deserving client experience. To Patek their watches are meant to be heirlooms, not to be worn by hype brand wearing hype fake rich flex lifestyle guys. This is why they are limiting their sport collection. Which really is their entry level Patek watches.

  • @edjustice7755
    @edjustice7755 3 года назад +6

    I agree with Alex, it’s not worth 50k. Buy a Ceramic Daytona, and u could buy a used Porsche Boxster as well. As an example....U could get a AP RO and match with a rubber, and get a Pepsi GMT..as Alex said a 100 different watches...and have spending money after...

    • @tommys6596
      @tommys6596 Год назад

      what are those worth now 😮

  • @andychang7137
    @andychang7137 3 года назад +3

    it's just like a painting
    it's not about the material
    it's about the design and history behind it
    Is it worth 50k?
    to me as an owner of 5167-1A, I'd say yes if I have the money
    it's a very sporty and yet elegant watch
    it will keep going up when it's discontinued
    Three years ago, I have a chance to buy 5167-1A
    but at that time, it's not catching my eye
    However, two years later, when I'm offered 5167-1A again,
    I feel so excited and can't wait to have it
    I have both 5167-1A and 5712-R
    all that I can say is 5167-1A is a very very special one
    kind of like hidden gem in PP (overshadowed by nautilus)
    it's probably the most beautiful aquanaut so far and I'm so grateful that I could buy it new

  • @josecmunozromero
    @josecmunozromero 3 года назад +16

    I love mine, honestly safe to say it will only go up in value.

    • @Guenounovitch
      @Guenounovitch 3 года назад +1

      Only aquatnaut owners think so

    • @Monami262
      @Monami262 2 года назад +2

      @@Guenounovitch it indeed is going up in value since the comment.

    • @nuggyfresh6430
      @nuggyfresh6430 5 месяцев назад

      Lol owned in 2024

  • @alexanderbitarhistory
    @alexanderbitarhistory 3 года назад +5

    Same here, took me a while to appreciate this watch 👌

  • @scottbrandon9390
    @scottbrandon9390 3 года назад +2

    RE. Scarcity. There is a scarcity as well. But you can always go on the used market to find what you want.

  • @mfhairstream6812
    @mfhairstream6812 3 года назад +3

    Can’t find one for $50k now

  • @keithharradence7568
    @keithharradence7568 3 года назад +3

    If you put it on your wrist you won’t want to take it off...and then you try to figure out how to get it. Of course it is madness. But then a rough Seiko 6105 is $3,000.

  • @weezkidtube
    @weezkidtube 3 года назад +7

    The dial lines look like a pineapple and an expensive one at that. Beautiful unit but would never put down 50k on a watch with a rubber strap. Thanks for the review, guys.

  • @robertsullivan4773
    @robertsullivan4773 3 года назад +3

    The reality of it is no watch is worth that. It's priced according to the desire of those that want it. The best case is the Rolex Daytona steel.

  • @rb3782
    @rb3782 2 года назад +2

    Of course it’s worth it. Prices like that keep the rabble away.

  • @afvro75
    @afvro75 2 года назад +6

    $75,000+ now.

    • @christianfloehr
      @christianfloehr 2 года назад

      Over 100k€ now… 🤘🏻🤪

    • @afvro75
      @afvro75 2 года назад

      @@christianfloehr Try U$160,000 new. Lol.

  • @brotherandrew3393
    @brotherandrew3393 10 месяцев назад +1

    The financial worth of a product is a question of supply and demand. As long as there are people who are ready to pay 50 grands for that watch that is its financial worth. In regard to the costs of its production it is of course not worth that much.

  • @locutusdborg126
    @locutusdborg126 3 года назад +2

    I own one and am thinking of trading it for the gold 5167R.

  • @touchingevil2302
    @touchingevil2302 3 года назад +5

    I dont like numbers on the dial, looke like a kids watch.

    • @19NJS71
      @19NJS71 2 года назад +1

      Dial need to be update

  • @zoobee
    @zoobee 3 года назад +3

    yes and no. its price is a function of brand and luxury brand perception and desirability. it doesn't make rational sense, but this is a field that isn't rational. I actually really like the look of this watch and would like to own one.

  • @tritran304
    @tritran304 2 года назад +1

    Where in the world can you get a 5167 for $50K?

  • @chauhanrajput4733
    @chauhanrajput4733 3 года назад +2

    When first i saw this watch in an video i did not care i did not like the watch. Recently a bizarre thing happed with me. My subconscious mind longing to see this watch agai and made to find and watch this watch. Now i am fallen in love with watch

  • @DonLee1980
    @DonLee1980 2 года назад +1

    ironically, I got a 5167A AND a 5205R together. And the 5205R gets almost no wrist time because i'll need to be in a very formal attire to wear it, and it seems to be too mature for me. The 5167 is worn 20x more often, and the 5205 is just a pretty thing in my watch box. The aquanaut is successful because it's perfect for any attire

  • @19NJS71
    @19NJS71 2 года назад +2

    They really need to update the dial.. it is so outdated

  • @juanbmaya2156
    @juanbmaya2156 3 года назад +2

    VC overseas blue dial video please !

    • @IFLWatches
      @IFLWatches  3 года назад

      Yes that one would be interesting to review :)

  • @musiclover4311
    @musiclover4311 2 года назад

    I own it and I love it more than my other Patek, 5712

  • @jeffreywee2895
    @jeffreywee2895 3 года назад +5

    Absolutely stunning piece.

  • @2015815
    @2015815 2 года назад

    What do you guys think of the new 4947/1A?

  • @traveltospace7058
    @traveltospace7058 3 года назад +7

    It's all about if you want to join the game or not, but 50k for an Aquanaut, no...

    • @Guenounovitch
      @Guenounovitch 3 года назад +2

      Some people are retarded and uneducate enough to buy « that » for that money instead or a lange 1 moonphase or a Journe . That’s hilarious to observe the aftermarket. Nothing surprises me anymore in this world….

  • @hke3g2006
    @hke3g2006 3 года назад +4

    tbh....the movement dose not look stunning at all...especially at this price point

  • @jackg2425
    @jackg2425 Год назад

    And the madness continued. Even with a crash 💥

  • @TheNikokokoko
    @TheNikokokoko 3 года назад +4

    watch on 1.5 speed, jesus christ

  • @marcelopachecopinto563
    @marcelopachecopinto563 9 месяцев назад

    At least is waterproof?

  • @allenpoyallenpoy1235
    @allenpoyallenpoy1235 3 года назад +1

    Can yourl review the patek 5712r

    • @andychang7137
      @andychang7137 3 года назад +1

      I have both 5167-1A and 5712-r
      they are both amazing in a different way

  • @tomthompson7400
    @tomthompson7400 Год назад

    I paid 32 pounds for a 5517 , and had two more in my drawer at the same time I could have bought for the same price ,,, and I thought that was a lot of money ,,, the worlds gone mad.

  • @johnthomas424
    @johnthomas424 2 года назад

    Hafzid J Mehmood must-watch video explains a lot of defects of this watch maybe design flaws freak of nature who knows but I was seriously thinking about purchasing this until I do that I will have to take a Jeweler's loupe or some type of magnifying glass to make my final decision on pulling the trigger or not to add it to my collections. My Rolexes do not give me any of those issues and my other time pieces in my collection including Omega's. I am very disappointed to say the least with the tick Philippe. I may just be looking into an AP now if not another Rolex sports model.

  • @Johnwis-gp9yy
    @Johnwis-gp9yy 9 месяцев назад

    I would buy it at retail in a heartbeat but to me it is not worth the double.

  • @hero629
    @hero629 3 года назад +2

    dude why you pronounce Aquanaut that way?

    • @IFLWatches
      @IFLWatches  3 года назад

      Swedish pronouncination I guess 😄

  • @djdc81
    @djdc81 3 года назад +5

    No.

  • @mahmoudghoneim8004
    @mahmoudghoneim8004 9 месяцев назад

    The fair price is what people are ready to pay for it, it only comes to what 50k represents for you, myself I am not buying a rubber strap watch at this price let alone a SS case.

  • @microbakery9085
    @microbakery9085 3 года назад +3

    Is iPone 12 worth over $1k and tons of people are still inline for it? BTW the cost is

    • @Zhxt666
      @Zhxt666 3 года назад

      Stupid comparison. U can’t get the watch at the retail price.

    • @microbakery9085
      @microbakery9085 3 года назад

      Man, can’t believe someone can be dumb enough to not be able to draw a parallel. China people, no surprise

  • @msherlock1607
    @msherlock1607 Год назад +1

    £19530 GBP

  • @JonWS55
    @JonWS55 10 месяцев назад

    Of course it isn't :) .. its a beautiful watch - I enjoyed my time with it ... but absolutely worth its retail price ;)

  • @sebastianmoradi4311
    @sebastianmoradi4311 3 месяца назад +1

    3 years later, $50k+

  • @stevewesthead
    @stevewesthead 2 года назад +1

    $50k?? You talking grey market?

    • @IFLWatches
      @IFLWatches  2 года назад

      Yes market price (at the time of recording)

  • @hendarinriandi1100
    @hendarinriandi1100 3 года назад +1

    I always love watches and Patek Phillipe is one of the best and beautiful but is it worth that amount of money? Certainly not at all ...... the most expensive is, like in all luxury stuff, the name it carry along. If Seiko built exactly the same watch to every detail (I am sure they are capable to do so) it will be much much less price than Patek

    • @eightosaurusspelunk1598
      @eightosaurusspelunk1598 2 года назад

      Absolutely. I also think that many people realize that. It's also ok, I guess.

  • @bryantlong6522
    @bryantlong6522 3 года назад +2

    why on earth are yall calling it a 50k watch? it's a 22k watch...

    • @IFLWatches
      @IFLWatches  3 года назад +1

      Check the market :)

    • @bryantlong6522
      @bryantlong6522 3 года назад +2

      @@IFLWatches I own one, I know what they’re worth on secondary. But it’s a 22k watch retail…your video is misleading to people.

    • @mainstreetbully6814
      @mainstreetbully6814 Год назад

      Bc they are scumbag grey market dealers

  • @billace90
    @billace90 6 месяцев назад +1

    …yes, (and I hope this is not insulting), or you could get a Specht & Sohne Homage watch of the Aquanaut for less than $100.00 US Dollars…😊

  • @raphaelortegacoste6509
    @raphaelortegacoste6509 3 года назад

    For the serious collector an Aquanaut is a must whatever the price.
    Maybe not for an amateur first watch investor...
    That’s it thank you

  • @aktionjackson8004
    @aktionjackson8004 2 года назад

    June 2022
    Aquanaut same one - 120 K

  • @Jungleman707
    @Jungleman707 3 года назад +1

    Tulip mania... Patek bubble?

  • @marcb92vjacques26
    @marcb92vjacques26 3 года назад +1

    the dial is a mess , look like a basket ball
    it's my opinion
    not for me , i have since the early 2000 , buy in second hand for 5 500 € , my nautilus 3800

  • @jltrem
    @jltrem Месяц назад

    McCartney wears one. End of debate.

  • @Watch4Me
    @Watch4Me Год назад

    Obviously a 50k watch is for someone for whom 50k is a fractional percent of their income/wealth. Buying to resell is also a fools errand IMO.

  • @yusufbest4475
    @yusufbest4475 2 года назад

    Nothing in this video justify the price tag except for the investment part which is just circular logic

  • @robynsjp
    @robynsjp Год назад

    I saw a standard one yesterday in a display window of a preowned watch store in Geneva. I was quite disappointed. I would give it 5-10K for its appeal to me, not more. And the rubber looks like vulgar, cheap plastic. So disappointed is the word considering the hype. Plus Nautilus and Aquanaut are part of the Rolexification of the Patek brand.

  • @kyleBlittle
    @kyleBlittle Год назад +1

    This watch is an ogre from the front and a princess from behind.

  • @khoimavlogs5161
    @khoimavlogs5161 9 месяцев назад

    Beautiful watch but not at $50k. Maybe at 25k yes

  • @daytonarol3x
    @daytonarol3x 2 года назад

    Nice piece but you could buy a better Patek watch for that price

  • @houlester
    @houlester 10 месяцев назад

    I would pay $10,000 because it says Patek.

  • @Devlin85
    @Devlin85 5 месяцев назад

    Definitely not. Would rather buy a Grand Seiko. They are much better quality and cheaper

  • @lailaandersen4472
    @lailaandersen4472 2 года назад

    🎯

  • @abdullahislam7451
    @abdullahislam7451 3 года назад

    That all 50,000

  • @stevewill3572
    @stevewill3572 2 года назад

    Try 100 now

  • @lgiraldo2587
    @lgiraldo2587 3 года назад

    I didn't know Trevor Noah was a watch watch dealer. Go figure 🤷‍♂️

  • @simonassouline45
    @simonassouline45 3 года назад +3

    Ugly Watch, worthless! Rolex is 1,000 times better!

    • @IAM_THAT_IAM888
      @IAM_THAT_IAM888 3 года назад

      @Andrea Leonardi 😆😆😆 that’s what I thought sheeeeeesh ! 😅

  • @1959Berre
    @1959Berre 15 часов назад

    This is one of the most boring watches ever. It has no character whatsoever. Is that dial a circle or is it octagonal? Or is it something in between? That shape reminds of an old TV screen. The dial is looks like the surface of a football. I would feel bad if I had to pay $50 for that hiddeous thing. I certainly would never wear it. This watch proofs that most people with way too much money have no taste at all.

  • @davidducovny1367
    @davidducovny1367 9 месяцев назад

    Sell it but Fast and get a new car

  • @user-kx8zx7xq4o
    @user-kx8zx7xq4o 9 месяцев назад

    And they don’t understand why people get rep. My MIDO Tv Big Date at 1200 is better looking and better constructed in my opinion

  • @alexlaroque5108
    @alexlaroque5108 Год назад

    Looks like a cheap watch.

  • @_pjd
    @_pjd 3 года назад +1

    Ok, so this is a 'Watch Channel' but your knowledge of watchmaking is poor. Do more research when preparing videos.

  • @nero9985
    @nero9985 6 месяцев назад

    Just buy a rep

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders 3 года назад +1

    If it hacks, lol

  • @Fred-nv8gf
    @Fred-nv8gf Год назад

    No.