@@ViridianFlow Not sure why Australians always say things like that when converting USD to Australian dollars $3500 = $5367 so it basically costs the same.
$300-400 is probably the cost of one of the two micro OLED displays. Every feature of the Vision Pro is class leading. I'm sure if Apple decided to build products with cheap sub-standard parts, they can compete with the others on price. I'm glad they go for quality and not volume.
My first thought on the battery life was that you can just plug in a more capable battery. I very quickly realized how dumb my idea is. Apple probably has thought about how to prevent you from doing such an obvious thing.
I’ll bet money that they won’t let you swap out the battery, and have it hard wired for “high power demand”. This whole thing is one big over priced gimmick. Edit: well I was wrong the battery is removable and not hardwired, but it still uses a proprietary cable and connector, so I wasn’t wrong they are still trying to screw you over.
as someone not yet brainwashed by apple, it reliably blows my mind how people are over and over and over again disappointed by new apple products but continue to buy them anyway! I have no idea how this company still exists.
dun think the disappointment is that great. I'm sure lots of people are happy with it. Apple fans just don't mind paying more and they're clearly no gamers so for many this is their first VR experience. They're in a bubble.
Most are lighter especially if you consider the battery. At that point it’s over 1kg! I’m picking mine up today either way, wish they had skipped the front screen and used a quality plastic or cloth on the front to cut out some serious weight. I think most who complain are using the dual loop band as that greatly helps spread the weight, but I’ll wait to see if anyone makes an aftermarket band
@@philiplubduck6107 Exactly. No need for that front screen and glass. Also they should have made it out of a good quality plastic and not metal. Probably would then be around 400g.
@@scottmartin5492 Yeah, that is why VR headsets will never pick up. Not until they make it lighter, thinner and last longer. It still is the ultra nerd's niche.
@@worthless_opinionbunch of weird people they wouldn’t say the same if they weren’t hidden behind a screen, perhaps this is the perfect device for them.
Man your sarcastic videos are more real that any tech videos available on the internet I can only watch your videos and can get unbiased information needed as a consumer against hype❤ loving keep making these videos
Apple is known to not support first gen products as long as the next generations. Getting a vr headset instead of top of the line computer is just a dumb financial move.
Even though the first gen product is not perfect but they already sold for a ton of money like I was reading somewhere already 180k pre-order within the first week of launch
@@linhliver The ones reviewing it on RUclips, sure. Either way they can write it as a business expense. But there are still fanboys who can't afford it but will sacrifice many other important necessities to get it or force their parents/guardians to get it for them
@@josephfrechette9916 There is no competitor for this other than Varjo XR, but that is almost double the price. The Quest 3 has A LOT of latency with passthrough, lasts even less time than the Apple Vision Pro, has MUCH worse screens AND cameras, lacks eye tracking, and has basically zero ecosystem of apps outside of games.
@@AJOlesen Yea, but the quest lets you game. Powerful or not, Apple Vision is a One-time use item. And it shows due to how many people are returning it
Almost $4000 for something that the $300 Quest 3 already does (and sometimes even better). Waste of money for sure. Also, the prescription VR lenses for the Quest 3 only cost $50. And the (much better looking) carry case, only $30😋
As long as its easier and more comfortable to pull out your phone, open a laptop or turn on your TV then VR will never reach mass Adoption. When its a pair of AR Glasses and not a pair of VR Goggles, in 20 years time when technology permits, then it might be a thing .
What 20 years time? I already attended several XR events, you get Vision Pro display clarity and Micro OLED with even higher FOV with built in battery and AR2 chip from Qualcomm + Wifi 7 in a glasses form factor with a 138g of weight... We are just 2 years away at max 3.... Infact to me Vision Pro is outdated as a hardware in this price point, what I have seen is well beyond Vision Pro
@@TRX25EX Until AR is AR ie fully transparent 4k micro LED's that you can see through both ways, that fit along with the processor, ram storage multiple cameras and sensors and a micro battery with 8 hrs plus battery life into something the size of a pair of specs, then yes that is 20 years away !
@@rocketmunkey1 you asking too much currently you get transparent display with active dimming function all the way to 0.001 light passthrough which means full VR support in a 4K Micro OLED with 120 FOV.... What is coming is more impressive this year in prototype which is dimming glass part only where the pixels that display content, rest stay full transparent.... Battery life not sure yet but AR2 is really good in battery life...
@@TRX25EX Ask too much ???? I'm not going to pay any amount of money until its the size of a pair of glasses, that I can actually see through and see the real world I'm not subjecting myself to VR end of ! And the mass market agrees in over 30 years of commercial VR it just hasn't taken off, despite numerous attempts, Heavy hot sweaty isolation googles is just not a thing the average person wants to subject themselves to ! when it's far easier to just pick up a phone or flip open their lap top.
@@rocketmunkey1 like I said what you asking for in terms of development it's there as a prototype in form of glasses, infact I saw crasy demos where I was seeing the ceiling and you ask the voice recognition to show you weather in London and you get to see the place you are in with London weather..... There's alot of cool stuff but since VR new to industry it takes time for approval, like I said Vision Pro looks outdated compared to tech I saw in the events
I've seen a lot of sheep hyped that this thing is a 5 years ahead of the tech. 2 hours on battery? pfft and can only surf the internet like your phone to look at the cooking recipe? This is a scam.
I'm glad it sucks. This will delay the zombie apocalypse... you know, when the majority of the population walks around with these things completely braindead and oblivious to anything going on in the real world.
@@umersalman1 With controllers, and using your finger as laserpointers with the hand tracking, it is much more convenient at tenth of the price... also the Quest 3 resolution is really good. And it has youtube and netflix
@@umersalman1 meta-quest version of this works fine as long as you don’t work for a company that uses a VPN. Or a company that doesn’t let you install outside software as many large fortune 500 companies don’t.
If I wasn't wearing headphones everyone nearby would think I'm actually watching "corn on the cob" lol. Which is probably 2 people, 4 cats and a kitten. Oof.
What you don't want the ICONIC $4k headset, with it's ICONIC headstrap and ICONIC low battery life? BUT ITS ICONIC!! Lol. like most iconic things it sucks.
Yea, i watched the Verge review on that one. And - he hinted at it ... the headset sees your hands ... almost everywhere! - so one of the MAIN purposes of a non gaming headset will be quite awkward (for those that siphon the data off your account)
I stopped buying Apple and Samsung because their prices are too high for what you get. Not to mention the fact that after a couple of years their updates slow down their phones.
VR has always stayed niche and will always stay niche. 3D movies failed because of it and most people who wear glasses (myself included) wish they didn't need to, many wear contacts to avoid having something on their heads at all times
I was born nearly blind in my right so I've been wearing glasses for almost 41 years, and you ain't lying, and forget about 3D/VR/AR for a good chunk of the population with vision issues like myself, as it will never work till we get Star Trek Holodeck rooms.
I have the exact feeling from Vison pro as it was with first iPhone. A mixture of excitement from defenitely a breakthrough piece of gear and a pinch of disappointment from aspects.
Even though that is most likely a joke, I think Google cardboard was such a good concept: cheap headset you can make at home, and you already have a phone so make that do all the processing.
@@Dann.y it was partly a joke; my main way of doing vr is with a google cardboard, however I don't think it's as good as the vision pro obviously. I agree though, it's a great concept.
@@lightbrownwolf I wish I could use it, my phone is too big for it though. I also with they never discontinued it. At least they didn't remove the feature to watch RUclips with it, but I wish they kept improving it.
2:45 This alone will kill the Apple Vision Pro. I may not have Netflix, but a lot of people do and one of the big reasons for VR glasses is having a giant screen everywhere you go. Of course you're only able to watch at most a 2 hour movie on there if you never pause or rewind it and start the movie quickly without searching too long.
The whole thing is one big gimmick as far as I can tell. Many of the "groundbreaking" features, like watching a movie in a virtual space, have been around since VR was introduced years ago (it reminds me of when Apple "invented" the tablet despite the fact that they had been introduced a full ten years prior by Microsoft and there were many precursors before that). Seeing the eyes is a gimmick and much more poorly implemented than represented. The avatars for facetime are creepy. The whole spatial video thing is fine if you are actually shooting videos for content but is not something that is useful for home use. It reminds me of the camcorder days when people were filming birthdays and Christmas the whole time - nobody watches that stuff and it's even more inconvenient because only one person can view it at a time. If I wanted to dump this kind of money on a headset, I'd get the Varjo XR-4. It's a way better machine with more support and tons of existing software. The Vision Pro is amazing tech and will draw a lot of eyes, which is great for the world of VR/MR/AR, but as someone who has been in that realm for ten years now, nothing here is groundbreaking beyond the quality of the tech being utilized.
I remember how apple fanboys thought this will be something from the future when we told them that microsoft and other companies have been doing this for many years, for much cheaper
their teams seem to be really great at taking things that other devices can already do, and then make them less practical to use and more expensive. quite the achievment that this whole project got all the go-aheads from initial designs to release.
I feel like this point of view is basically the same as when people had only negative reviews for Macs or any other Apple product.. of course this device is very overpriced and not the best, but this is a beginning of a new era. Making constructive critic is needed but this is only looking at the empty side of the glass. Or this is all part of the humour and I am a Karen, idk guys im new around here hahahah.
Does it have Gorilla Tag? I think the folks in Cupertino must have found an old bag of mushrooms Steve left behind a bookcase and then came up with the idea for this thing. It's like something you'd see on Tim and Eric; The Cinco Uni Visor.
the Meta Quest 2 is less than a tenth of the price and while it doesn't show the real world in perfect clarity (a bit of a greyscale haze) you can tell where you're walking; it has most of the same app capabilities (but can also run Netflix and RUclips, being that it can easily link with a PC) and might even have more of a sightline than apple's "if seeing is so good why didn't they make a Seeing 2?" Yes, AR is different from VR, but this is more like VR Lite, being that a phone can do all the things it can and has 10x longer battery It needs improvement, don't spend 4000 theoretical dollars on this
"That's the Spirit leaving the Body". I'm dead!! 😂😂🤣🤣
Well yeah... if you're dead that's the spirit leaving the body
VR is a bit like death tho isn't it. only without the Heaven bit, kind of like a 4k purgatory.
You are not alone. I began laughing too.
That was the best part. OMG
Yeah that was brilliant!
I'm laughing out loud about the porn insinuations 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Bro's actually laughing out loud!!!
Yeah and because it knows where your hands are it also knows when you have one of your hands in a certain location making certain movements...
what insinuation it was actually people sex moaning
Why, are you 10?
this youtuber and all his fan look like a bunch of porn nerds
you had me fooled there, thought you actually forked out 4k for it lol
Are you new around here? :D
First rule of watching samtime: never trust sam.
We'd be lucky to get it for $5500 in Australia. I'm guessing closer to $6000 here, considering most things are basically double the price here.
@@ViridianFlow Not sure why Australians always say things like that when converting USD to Australian dollars $3500 = $5367 so it basically costs the same.
@@ViridianFlowI'm from Australia and you can currently order it from Kogan. 6k and over
Stay for the ending. Hilarious.
Brilliant 😂
Lol, really)) Followed your advice.
I can see that happening, too 😏
I died at the speakers part🤣
Ah, that must be when the spirit left the body.
💀@@joonglegamer9898
😆😆😆
@@joonglegamer9898Something else definitely will leave our body
RIP
The absolute last bit, "it looks smaller in person than they expected"
Lmao.
😂😂😂😂
Shrinkage
More like pixilated. 😂
If this thing was selling for around $300-400 like it's worth, I'd consider it. $3400 is just crowd control.
You paying for software development cost not hardware..... It's hardware is from 2022
I would only but if it cost more. Blowing huge amounts of money on stupid shit makes me feel good about myself.
@@TRX25EXlmao they asking entire development cost 😂
@@TRX25EX or 2020 🤣
$300-400 is probably the cost of one of the two micro OLED displays. Every feature of the Vision Pro is class leading. I'm sure if Apple decided to build products with cheap sub-standard parts, they can compete with the others on price. I'm glad they go for quality and not volume.
And the one I have here... is just a PNG image, darn it! 😂😂
My first thought on the battery life was that you can just plug in a more capable battery. I very quickly realized how dumb my idea is. Apple probably has thought about how to prevent you from doing such an obvious thing.
that's true, i haven't seen daisy chaining tested yet
Yeah, no freaking way will Apple let you use anything but their own battery for this. I’d bet my left shoe!
@@400_billion_sunsI'll bet your right shoe as well!
I’ll bet money that they won’t let you swap out the battery, and have it hard wired for “high power demand”. This whole thing is one big over priced gimmick.
Edit: well I was wrong the battery is removable and not hardwired, but it still uses a proprietary cable and connector, so I wasn’t wrong they are still trying to screw you over.
You can plus in more batteries. But do you really want to carry more weight
as someone not yet brainwashed by apple, it reliably blows my mind how people are over and over and over again disappointed by new apple products but continue to buy them anyway! I have no idea how this company still exists.
The same reason why diamonds sell, despite being almost worthless outside of artificial hiked pricing. Branding and promotion.
@@Atlas_Reduxdreadful example! Lol
Because they’re less garbage than the alternatives
@@NN-sp9tu mans looked at like three $200 android phones and called it quits ☠
dun think the disappointment is that great. I'm sure lots of people are happy with it.
Apple fans just don't mind paying more and they're clearly no gamers so for many this is their first VR experience. They're in a bubble.
3:30 For their $200 case, you can almost buy a competing VR headset or a used older one.
Meta Quest 2 is being sold by $249 right now. MQ3 by $499.
you can use that to cover 3rd party Q3 accessories AND a case
Except you’re still buying a Meta Quest. I’ve tried both. Not even comparable.
@@rexmaximilian9548 Yeah, I still prefer my Index :D… Though if it would break, I might just replace it with a Beyond.
how is it the original oculus rift is still the best PC vr headset
people say it's not for everyone but I say it's not for anyone 😂😂😂😂😂
Sam, you just invented the term SPATIAL PORNOGRAPHY. The last part floored me. 😂😂😂😂
For the price the Vision pro, you could buy a PS5, xbox series X, 4K projector, big TV and a quest 3.
Yes, that's correct! I would still have more money left.
Fuck those, buy a high end pc and you'd still have alot left
You know, you could buy a 1990's car and still have money left over...
The ending was wild. I had my speakers up 😂
🤣
😂😂😂
I wonder if Sam actually created that audio or it's available here on the web. 😂
I lost it at the ending 💀
The pornhub joke get me laughing at loud everytime
Wait really, heavier than an iPad pro? LOL.
The "avatar" looks like the picture you put on your funeral.
Find me a consumer VR headset that's *not* heavier than an iPad Pro.
@@scottmartin5492Meta Quest 2
Most are lighter especially if you consider the battery. At that point it’s over 1kg!
I’m picking mine up today either way, wish they had skipped the front screen and used a quality plastic or cloth on the front to cut out some serious weight.
I think most who complain are using the dual loop band as that greatly helps spread the weight, but I’ll wait to see if anyone makes an aftermarket band
@@philiplubduck6107 Exactly. No need for that front screen and glass. Also they should have made it out of a good quality plastic and not metal. Probably would then be around 400g.
@@scottmartin5492 Yeah, that is why VR headsets will never pick up. Not until they make it lighter, thinner and last longer. It still is the ultra nerd's niche.
A world where everyone has ski goggles strapped to their face is not one I want to live in.
then leave it
The tech curve, we’re we all become a little bit less.
Turns out that handwriting is actually a net positive for our neurons!
@@aManFromEarth I'm good. But you must be in a bad place to say such a wretched thing to a stranger. I do hope you have better days ahead. God bless.
@@worthless_opinion Sorry, my comment was uncalled for. Take care.
@@worthless_opinionbunch of weird people they wouldn’t say the same if they weren’t hidden behind a screen, perhaps this is the perfect device for them.
It's the subtle sarcasm that gets me. 😂 "you're lucky there's no notch in there, missing niche apps like Netflix and YT.."
You sumup everything so well. I regret watching hour long review videos.
Man your sarcastic videos are more real that any tech videos available on the internet I can only watch your videos and can get unbiased information needed as a consumer against hype❤ loving keep making these videos
Apple is known to not support first gen products as long as the next generations. Getting a vr headset instead of top of the line computer is just a dumb financial move.
Especially since their competitors are all cheaper and actually have applications that justify the cost.
Let's get real, the ones who bought this do not really care about the price tag cuz they earn much more than that.
Even though the first gen product is not perfect but they already sold for a ton of money like I was reading somewhere already 180k pre-order within the first week of launch
@@linhliver The ones reviewing it on RUclips, sure. Either way they can write it as a business expense. But there are still fanboys who can't afford it but will sacrifice many other important necessities to get it or force their parents/guardians to get it for them
@@josephfrechette9916 There is no competitor for this other than Varjo XR, but that is almost double the price. The Quest 3 has A LOT of latency with passthrough, lasts even less time than the Apple Vision Pro, has MUCH worse screens AND cameras, lacks eye tracking, and has basically zero ecosystem of apps outside of games.
$3500 is insane. No way when the quest is just $500
Well, it is more powerful than the quest, but I would still not buy it because it is super expensive.
@@AJOlesen Yea, but the quest lets you game. Powerful or not, Apple Vision is a One-time use item.
And it shows due to how many people are returning it
The Nilay montage at the end with the speakers though 😂
Somebody send this link to him! 😂
Why would anyone keep a $3,500 VR headset?
If apple made AR glasses that would be different. This product is a big miss.
Welcome to the most extravagant VR experience that you already have with Quest 2 for only 249 dolares 😂 2:57😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You can't say that! Apple don't allow sideloading, so you are stucked with 5 apps! xD
@@Sajgoniarz Apple in vented VR ten years from now tho
@@BozesanVladHuh??
yeah that meta quest ecosystem is top notch LOL
Nilay Patel from Verge getting jiggy 😂
That ending skit with the audio had me 😂😂😂
Almost $4000 for something that the $300 Quest 3 already does (and sometimes even better). Waste of money for sure. Also, the prescription VR lenses for the Quest 3 only cost $50. And the (much better looking) carry case, only $30😋
Dude, you can get prescription eyeglasses online for under 20 bucks these days. Wtf are you talking about, $150 is "reasonable"?
The speakers part! I can't🤣☠️
3500 dollars no other reason to say no
The vision Pro does NOT look comfortable or fun to wear, and I am a geek who has a fetish about tech. Hey wait a minute that didn't sound right.
I really thought you bought it. Smoothly done 👍
As long as its easier and more comfortable to pull out your phone, open a laptop or turn on your TV then VR will never reach mass Adoption.
When its a pair of AR Glasses and not a pair of VR Goggles, in 20 years time when technology permits, then it might be a thing .
What 20 years time? I already attended several XR events, you get Vision Pro display clarity and Micro OLED with even higher FOV with built in battery and AR2 chip from Qualcomm + Wifi 7 in a glasses form factor with a 138g of weight...
We are just 2 years away at max 3.... Infact to me Vision Pro is outdated as a hardware in this price point, what I have seen is well beyond Vision Pro
@@TRX25EX Until AR is AR ie fully transparent 4k micro LED's that you can see through both ways, that fit along with the processor, ram storage multiple cameras and sensors and a micro battery with 8 hrs plus battery life into something the size of a pair of specs, then yes that is 20 years away !
@@rocketmunkey1 you asking too much currently you get transparent display with active dimming function all the way to 0.001 light passthrough which means full VR support in a 4K Micro OLED with 120 FOV.... What is coming is more impressive this year in prototype which is dimming glass part only where the pixels that display content, rest stay full transparent.... Battery life not sure yet but AR2 is really good in battery life...
@@TRX25EX Ask too much ???? I'm not going to pay any amount of money until its the size of a pair of glasses, that I can actually see through and see the real world I'm not subjecting myself to VR end of !
And the mass market agrees in over 30 years of commercial VR it just hasn't taken off, despite numerous attempts, Heavy hot sweaty isolation googles is just not a thing the average person wants to subject themselves to ! when it's far easier to just pick up a phone or flip open their lap top.
@@rocketmunkey1 like I said what you asking for in terms of development it's there as a prototype in form of glasses, infact I saw crasy demos where I was seeing the ceiling and you ask the voice recognition to show you weather in London and you get to see the place you are in with London weather.....
There's alot of cool stuff but since VR new to industry it takes time for approval, like I said Vision Pro looks outdated compared to tech I saw in the events
Bro I swear u get funnier every video, i don’t even smile watching SNL or Comedy Central but ur jokes hit everytime
1:09 lmfao that clip still makes me laugh every time i see it
I've seen a lot of sheep hyped that this thing is a 5 years ahead of the tech. 2 hours on battery? pfft and can only surf the internet like your phone to look at the cooking recipe? This is a scam.
I'm glad it sucks. This will delay the zombie apocalypse... you know, when the majority of the population walks around with these things completely braindead and oblivious to anything going on in the real world.
"Especially if you speak Italian!" 😂 That got me good! 👌🏾
I saw MKBHD show off the remote screen for the macbook, that was the only thing that impressed me about it.
yeah you dont need a 4000$ headset for that. Meta Quest 2 or 3 also handle desktop VR like a champ.
@@umersalman1weird, people buying varjo and pimax aren't bright then
@@umersalman1 With controllers, and using your finger as laserpointers with the hand tracking, it is much more convenient at tenth of the price... also the Quest 3 resolution is really good. And it has youtube and netflix
i mean this whole thing seem like a worse quest 3 for 8x the price@@umersalman1
@@umersalman1 meta-quest version of this works fine as long as you don’t work for a company that uses a VPN. Or a company that doesn’t let you install outside software as many large fortune 500 companies don’t.
3:27 especially if you speak Italian 😂
Wait it's not wireless?
Apple: That will be $3499
I won’t be wasting my money on this
Wait. You only get 2 hours to be mobile with it and then you are chained to the wall with the charger? Yeah no.
Truly, this is art.
One of the finest pieces Sam from Sambabwe has ever produced.
Thank you Apple for providing inspiration for this masterpiece.
Our most expensive POS yet!!
4:14 We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled.
the Italian part killed me.. like I had the joke in my mind and sam said it! 😅😂
If I wasn't wearing headphones everyone nearby would think I'm actually watching "corn on the cob" lol. Which is probably 2 people, 4 cats and a kitten. Oof.
What you don't want the ICONIC $4k headset, with it's ICONIC headstrap and ICONIC low battery life?
BUT ITS ICONIC!!
Lol. like most iconic things it sucks.
Where did you try one?
Who said I have tried one? No this is just my take on the marketing.
@@DailyCorvid it's obvious you didn't, but already know if it's good or not for some reason
It's called having life experience.
@@DailyCorvid alright, how many vr headsets do you have then?
I misread the title.
I was wondering: "Why 'rectum'...???"
😂😂😂
Thanks for this you are now my main tech news source basically
By this point Sam, Apple is not the one punishing you, you're just punishing yourself.
No video games. I mean apple can’t run shit even if they have a supercomputer inside that.
If you have carry a box on the end of a cable with it, why didn’t the move as much electronics as possible into it? To save weight on your head.
Oh man, you cracked me up with that I don’t think my head moves like this comment… Priceless man keep doing what you do :-)
Apple still sold the PNG for $80 to Sam.
actually onions cause tears via the nose, not the eyes. so they wouldn't help reduce onion tears.
Yea, i watched the Verge review on that one. And - he hinted at it ... the headset sees your hands ... almost everywhere! - so one of the MAIN purposes of a non gaming headset will be quite awkward (for those that siphon the data off your account)
I stopped buying Apple and Samsung because their prices are too high for what you get. Not to mention the fact that after a couple of years their updates slow down their phones.
im convinced sam just hates apple at this point
VR has always stayed niche and will always stay niche. 3D movies failed because of it and most people who wear glasses (myself included) wish they didn't need to, many wear contacts to avoid having something on their heads at all times
I was born nearly blind in my right so I've been wearing glasses for almost 41 years, and you ain't lying, and forget about 3D/VR/AR for a good chunk of the population with vision issues like myself, as it will never work till we get Star Trek Holodeck rooms.
I have the exact feeling from Vison pro as it was with first iPhone. A mixture of excitement from defenitely a breakthrough piece of gear and a pinch of disappointment from aspects.
The first iPhone didnt come out costing 7 times that of the competition.
I'm glad you didnt actually buy it. I thought you bought it just to return it. would be very dumb
Apparently VR is not the future as Hollywood claimed it to be
Let’s review something I don’t even have.
Honesty is rare these days 😊❤
The p*rn joke killed me 😂😂😂
i'll stick with my google cardboard
Even though that is most likely a joke, I think Google cardboard was such a good concept: cheap headset you can make at home, and you already have a phone so make that do all the processing.
@@Dann.y it was partly a joke; my main way of doing vr is with a google cardboard, however I don't think it's as good as the vision pro obviously. I agree though, it's a great concept.
@@lightbrownwolf I wish I could use it, my phone is too big for it though. I also with they never discontinued it. At least they didn't remove the feature to watch RUclips with it, but I wish they kept improving it.
@@Dann.y I dont know why they discontinued it, stuff like google street view vr doesn't exist anymore :(
By far the best Vision Pro review to date: most thorough and unbiased, as usual.
Thanks!
Apple missed the boat with VP. This is a product that few will want (lust after), and a product that nobody needs.
They didn’t include the rest of the scuba diving set
I think that side-on PR picture makes it looks like fetishwear.
well now you know what to use when cutting onion without getting you cry over something. what a bless we have with this cool gadget
2:45 This alone will kill the Apple Vision Pro. I may not have Netflix, but a lot of people do and one of the big reasons for VR glasses is having a giant screen everywhere you go. Of course you're only able to watch at most a 2 hour movie on there if you never pause or rewind it and start the movie quickly without searching too long.
Tbh i am shocked apple didnt have the battery in the band to act as a counter weight
Remember Cartman drooling wearing a VR headset? That.
The whole thing is one big gimmick as far as I can tell. Many of the "groundbreaking" features, like watching a movie in a virtual space, have been around since VR was introduced years ago (it reminds me of when Apple "invented" the tablet despite the fact that they had been introduced a full ten years prior by Microsoft and there were many precursors before that). Seeing the eyes is a gimmick and much more poorly implemented than represented. The avatars for facetime are creepy. The whole spatial video thing is fine if you are actually shooting videos for content but is not something that is useful for home use. It reminds me of the camcorder days when people were filming birthdays and Christmas the whole time - nobody watches that stuff and it's even more inconvenient because only one person can view it at a time. If I wanted to dump this kind of money on a headset, I'd get the Varjo XR-4. It's a way better machine with more support and tons of existing software.
The Vision Pro is amazing tech and will draw a lot of eyes, which is great for the world of VR/MR/AR, but as someone who has been in that realm for ten years now, nothing here is groundbreaking beyond the quality of the tech being utilized.
I remember how apple fanboys thought this will be something from the future when we told them that microsoft and other companies have been doing this for many years, for much cheaper
their teams seem to be really great at taking things that other devices can already do, and then make them less practical to use and more expensive.
quite the achievment that this whole project got all the go-aheads from initial designs to release.
So expensive that youtubers won’t even open it up for the clicks. Maybe watch the reviews before you buy it, that’ll save the couriers some time.
That mourning at the end 😂😂
I can’t tell if you haven’t washed your hair in a couple months or you think a gallon of super glue mixed with man juice is a hair product. 🤨
The free Bra joke cracked me up!😂
So many gems in your skit, I had to watch it again... The last one being pure genius to have catched!
Honestly coming from quest 3
This is a great upgrade, it you only use it for productivity.
Gaming… nvm
Seems like a worse version of google glass.
Best ad ever!
the ending 😂😂😂
I feel like this point of view is basically the same as when people had only negative reviews for Macs or any other Apple product.. of course this device is very overpriced and not the best, but this is a beginning of a new era. Making constructive critic is needed but this is only looking at the empty side of the glass. Or this is all part of the humour and I am a Karen, idk guys im new around here hahahah.
It's a tech parody channel.
@@tkps so i was being a karen indeed. Hahahahah thanks for letting me know
That png tricked me for too long ... I was like ain't no way Sam is dumb enough to buy this crap
Does it have Gorilla Tag? I think the folks in Cupertino must have found an old bag of mushrooms Steve left behind a bookcase and then came up with the idea for this thing. It's like something you'd see on Tim and Eric; The Cinco Uni Visor.
0:53 😂😂 imagine spending 4K to not cry while u chop onions.
Apple has released the first fanless product in a long time: the Vision Pro. I mean which reviewer is a fan?
More like Apple Vision No
The italian joke almost killed me😂😂😂.
Who needs peripheral vision anyways.
Forced tunnel vision won't cause any problems I'm sure.
Seriously not that bad of a device. Definitely revolutionary for sure and I wish I had the money to buy it
the Meta Quest 2 is less than a tenth of the price and while it doesn't show the real world in perfect clarity (a bit of a greyscale haze) you can tell where you're walking; it has most of the same app capabilities (but can also run Netflix and RUclips, being that it can easily link with a PC) and might even have more of a sightline than apple's "if seeing is so good why didn't they make a Seeing 2?"
Yes, AR is different from VR, but this is more like VR Lite, being that a phone can do all the things it can and has 10x longer battery
It needs improvement, don't spend 4000 theoretical dollars on this
so if someone ask will it work for ear pods, you know what they going to use this for ...dont want that speaker blasting the HUB sound