Shoot Film: LC-A Instant Back (Lomography)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 май 2019
  • Thanks for watching!
    This is not sponsored and nobody asked me to leave any links, but it feels like the right thing to do, so here's the link to the Instant Back in case you are interested: shop.lomography.com/es/lc-a-i...
    If you want to support this channel, you can become a Patreon:
    / edpavez
    All my videos are filmed with the Canon EOS M (first model) with the 22mm kit lens.
    Aaaand... it's written at the end of the video, but my Instagram account is: / edpavez
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 66

  • @Luukazzzz
    @Luukazzzz 5 лет назад +15

    7:18 Just casually trying to open a secret door

  • @iNerdier
    @iNerdier 5 лет назад +49

    I love instax film but man this is just terrible. Even the stock instax cameras with plastic lenses give better results than this.

    • @edpavez
      @edpavez  5 лет назад +3

      iNerdier yep. The vignetting is quite extreme. I wonder if the results will be better with a Lomo LC-A+ without any extra lenses.

  • @benhein7090
    @benhein7090 5 лет назад +2

    love the b-roll :) glad to see you're back in action, and survived a semester! have fun in brooklyn.

  • @kafka1787
    @kafka1787 5 лет назад

    Very interesting video, thank you Ed. Also, the photos look really good for my taste. 💕 Hope you and Fran are having an amazing time at the new apartment!

  • @TrentGamingCo
    @TrentGamingCo 5 лет назад

    yay we need more NYC street photography Eduardo, I love it

  • @Noealz
    @Noealz 5 лет назад

    always look forward to your videos man

  • @PasqualeEttorre
    @PasqualeEttorre 5 лет назад

    Cool! I will try to have one to test with portraits on my channel! Great video!

  • @GlendaSiagian
    @GlendaSiagian 5 лет назад +1

    Never use a Lomo camera but those pics surely cool looking ❤️

  • @Lastman737
    @Lastman737 5 лет назад

    Cool video! Keep them coming.
    mi compañera en fotografia
    📷✌

  • @vincentseymour2599
    @vincentseymour2599 5 лет назад +1

    X-pan is exciting, but i love how u say it out more! XD

  • @mchlhth
    @mchlhth 5 лет назад +1

    It makes sense to me that ISO 400 gives you better results in daylight. Fujifilm rates Instax film at ISO 800, and anything beyond a single stop of extra light just blows everything. It’s almost like instant slide film, where pushing and pulling has to be done with intent and care.

  • @dangerpowers123
    @dangerpowers123 5 лет назад +1

    Love your channel, the music is lovely too. It's a shame the Instax back and lens causes so much loss in image quality. But hay it's all about the fun of shooting. I crossed processed some colour film in rodianl and the results were not great. ..but it's all about the fun of trying new things. Good luck with the move.

  • @josetarrega890
    @josetarrega890 5 лет назад +11

    Tus vídeos me encantan, los resultados de esta cámara son horribles. Ojalá publiques más contenido en español

  • @andriykryvtsun6201
    @andriykryvtsun6201 5 лет назад

    Thanks for the current NYC views)

  • @horatiueduard
    @horatiueduard 5 лет назад

    I love your cat!

  • @matthewsaldivar7616
    @matthewsaldivar7616 3 года назад

    What kind of glasses are you wearing? Like what’s the style? The look awesome

  • @thedondeluxe6941
    @thedondeluxe6941 5 лет назад +3

    Your cat makes a good point.

  • @cassia_cries
    @cassia_cries 5 лет назад +9

    well that's a contraption I'd happily drop in a shredder!

  • @bambiwatsonart
    @bambiwatsonart 5 лет назад +1

    Would you ever be interested in doing a video on Polaroid?:)

  • @pietrohonshi6946
    @pietrohonshi6946 5 лет назад

    Hi Eduardo, Do you know which program helps convert the digital image into Film Black and white ?

  • @jarrettesaw5221
    @jarrettesaw5221 5 лет назад +4

    you should do a film photo walk/get together in NYC!

  • @jeffs7066
    @jeffs7066 5 лет назад

    Great video Ed! I also really enjoyed the musical number playing during the picture taking segment. Who’s the artist and what’s the title of the track?

  • @alifdzeko
    @alifdzeko 5 лет назад

    Cool✨

  • @GabrielaOliveira-sm9fc
    @GabrielaOliveira-sm9fc 5 лет назад

    Oh man i really need your help! I Just get a Konica ee matic deluxe and i think its shutter is broken but i really dont no i have been searching and that is only indian reviews in RUclips

  • @alexisoviedo1686
    @alexisoviedo1686 5 лет назад

    Me encantaría ver una reseña de la minolta cle, saludos desde iquique chile

  • @SatanSupimpa
    @SatanSupimpa 5 лет назад +1

    You need to get in touch with Seth Miranda to talk about the wonders of the Brooklyn reflector.

  • @martinchen444
    @martinchen444 3 года назад

    Hi !excuse me
    How can I buy the Lc-wide instant back kit~
    I can’t find in Taiwan :(

  • @bisibela2701
    @bisibela2701 5 лет назад

    personally not a fan of instax . however, your show inspires me to go out and shoot film every single time :))

  • @m0rla_
    @m0rla_ 5 лет назад

    So the vignette comes from the correction lens? Also... are those new glasses? >:0

  • @Wanton110
    @Wanton110 4 года назад

    I assume they fixed the springs.. I have an 80s russian lomo lc-a with that back but for a few years ago and the springs weren't long enough to push the film so you only got 5 pictures, I had to buy a broken instax camera and swap the springs.. but the pics were in focus :P

    • @edpavez
      @edpavez  4 года назад

      I guess this back with a Lomo LC-A must work way better.

  • @Rafa.R.R.G.G.
    @Rafa.R.R.G.G. 5 лет назад

    Por favor subtítulos en español en todos tus vídeos!!! Son geniales!!!

  • @sebvz89
    @sebvz89 5 лет назад

    jajaja me gusta la manera en que te acercas y actuas de forma en que los demas no se dan cuenta

  • @Francois_L_7933
    @Francois_L_7933 5 лет назад

    The way I see it, if you already have the LCA, the back might be worth it but it won't give you better result than their Lomo Instant cameras. I was looking at their site and the back alone costs more than the Lomo'Instant. With the adapter lens that's required for the LCA, it probably comes close to the Lomo'Instant Automat. I guess the looks and the numbers speak for themselves.

  • @douggottlieb
    @douggottlieb 5 лет назад

    Woof. And I love a bit of vignette. Yikes. Seems like you could make really really low fi images with a less expensive, more ergonomic way.

  • @DiegoRivera-zp8fz
    @DiegoRivera-zp8fz 5 лет назад +1

    Nooooo, ya no pusiste subtitulos en español. :(

    • @mathiasmclean8853
      @mathiasmclean8853 5 лет назад

      Eso mismo me di cuenta, me gustan sus videos cuando le pone subtitulos, aun que esten en ingles igual me sirve para aprender. (el inglés)

  • @nicoizquierdo6270
    @nicoizquierdo6270 5 лет назад

    Es una pena que ya no subtitules tus videos

    • @edpavez
      @edpavez  5 лет назад +1

      no me da el tiempo. estoy sacando un doctorado en Columbia. si sabes de alguien que se anime a subtitular, avísame. :)

  • @anarchytect1469
    @anarchytect1469 5 лет назад +1

    The multiple exposure wea?

    • @roberts.s
      @roberts.s 5 лет назад +3

      This comment post '2 days ago' ? 🤔

    • @edpavez
      @edpavez  5 лет назад +3

      My Patrons have early access to my videos. ;)

  • @gustavootero
    @gustavootero 5 лет назад +2

    Lomo o la habilidad de convertir los defectos en dinero. Es como el vestido del rey un día nos vamos a dar cuenta que estaba desnudo y diremos cuantas fotos horribles y caras hemos sacado con nuestra Lomo.

  • @Ruylopez778
    @Ruylopez778 5 лет назад

    Maybe Mint would like to lend you a RF70? Do you know "myinstantimages" on instagram? Instax film is really great with a decent lens. Thanks for the video, and good luck with everything.

  • @luis-uz7bc
    @luis-uz7bc 5 лет назад +3

    Caro Eduardo video interessante come sempre! e' vero che tutto cio' e sogettivo ma me pare una cagata questa LC-A instant Salutoni!!

  • @jothlorien
    @jothlorien 5 лет назад +1

    La prueba está muy bien, pero creo que queda claro que es una tirada de dinero el adaptador ese...

  • @calvinchann1996
    @calvinchann1996 5 лет назад +20

    Personal opinion, I don’t dig the results

  • @FrankWalsh
    @FrankWalsh 5 лет назад

    So in summary, without adapter lens = terrible. With adapter lens = awful :-) Thankfully you have a great eye, so the images are interesting in spite of (not because of) the lomo look.

  • @klazorkin
    @klazorkin 5 лет назад +3

    IMHO those lomo backs (LC-a & Diana) are a piece of crap, I had the Diana one, sold it after couple of weeks. In like 4 packs of film I got maybe 4-6 ok pictures, just a waist of film. Better to buy any Instax camera and enjoy shooting, not disappoint yourself with this expensive experiment.

  • @EFD620G
    @EFD620G 5 лет назад

    Digitize the shots because the film doesn't hold up over time.

  • @iggygnacho7455
    @iggygnacho7455 5 лет назад +1

    Anyone else gonna comment how the adapter lens attatches like an infinity stone hehe

  • @MorbidJayGames
    @MorbidJayGames 5 лет назад

    Nah

  • @UlyssesSB
    @UlyssesSB 5 лет назад

    Honestly i'd rather shoot with a plastic point and shoot camera

  • @mpk33
    @mpk33 5 лет назад +10

    Anything other than the better Lomo films I stay away from. "The Lomo look" is just plain terrible to me. Film photography is expensive enough without your photos looking like a bad LSD trip.

    • @RamoArt
      @RamoArt 5 лет назад

      Which of their films do you like? I've only tried the 800 iso color negative and really liked it, but I would like to know which ones I should stay away from

  • @elr8691
    @elr8691 5 лет назад +1

    Yikes! That's pretty bad!

  • @dmitriyfedorov6331
    @dmitriyfedorov6331 5 лет назад

    I'm looking not for "absolute quality", but for decent quality which Fuji Instax camera has and Lomo doesn't. Producing such a terrible vignetting is a real crime)

  • @ownvideofootage
    @ownvideofootage 5 лет назад

    Que porquería!

    • @maxwellwellmax878
      @maxwellwellmax878 5 лет назад

      Porque?

    • @ownvideofootage
      @ownvideofootage 5 лет назад

      @@maxwellwellmax878 invertir en un sistema que te da ése resultado. Mejor la Fuji intax original, cualquiera!

    • @maxwellwellmax878
      @maxwellwellmax878 5 лет назад

      @@ownvideofootage si pero es flexible porque podes usar Rollos de 35mm e Instantaneos.

    • @ownvideofootage
      @ownvideofootage 5 лет назад

      @@maxwellwellmax878 ya tengo ambas por separado, ambas dan buenos resultados... así estoy satisfecho.
      Cualquier camara con grasa de chasis en el lente se verá como esa Lomo.

    • @maxwellwellmax878
      @maxwellwellmax878 5 лет назад

      @@ownvideofootage si pero hay gente que talvez le interese porque no tendra que comprar dos camaras separadas, y la verdad que estas camaras no son para gente que quiere resultados nitidos! sino para gente que gravita hacia resultados como las Holga.

  • @C.Abbenfield
    @C.Abbenfield 5 лет назад +2

    I really dont see how this setup makes any sense. To be honest I get more and more annoyed seeing Lomo products, for the prices they ask they just sell a ton of garbage. Also how they send you the back without the correction lens. And how the thing doesnt close anymore as soon as the lens is on.. it just seems like a messy bunch of not well thought through plastic, deliberately producing bad images. I dont see any contribution to the film community.. trash the company and reward peoples interest and money with cheap but reliable film would be best. Its just sad...
    Edit: just checked again out of interest; 300 euro for JUST the LC-A+?? Like what?? So stupid.. they are robbing the film community imho