One correction I would make to Dr. Petersons quip about Tiger Woods. He didn’t cheat WITH a Swedish Bikini model, he cheated ON a Swedish Bikini model. It doesn’t invalidate his point that it’s easy to be pious when you don’t have any real temptations, but it’s very funny to think about cheating on someone who is by every measure gorgeous.
@@Maxmaxmax63 Yes of Morroco, His Majesty King Mohamed VI emphasized that Morocco’s southern provinces have served as a link between Morocco and its African roots at the human, spiritual, cultural, and economic levels.. But where is the record that any other was annointed king?
Hello Matt, and fellow community members. Can we see a debate regarding the death penalty from 2 Catholic debaters? I’ve seen many that are in favor of it and many that are not. Thank you Matt for the work you do in regard to the channel, this has helped me significantly in my reconversion. God bless
There's a reason why so many child actors end up becoming human train wrecks once they reach adulthood. Being bombarded with that level of attention hijacks the person's perception of the world. I mean, it's hard to envision someone in their 50s with all their life experience and wisdom suddenly becoming a clout chaser, even if they happen to be solipsistic.
"Listen here BUDDY. If ya think you're gonna tie my tongue with the LOBSTER 🦞 dialectic, then you're in for a big FUQQIN polite surprise! An, ya know, that's an endeavor of dialogue! Ya know you aren't yourself without the responsibility of denying pride! BUDDY!"
This is the third ad Jordan pushed on me on May 16 Jordan needs to address as part of a disciplinary probation order, a period of suspension may be imposed prior to the effective date of the probation. The Board's Disciplinary Guidelines provide details of the conditions under which a suspension may be made a part of the probation order. During suspension, licensees may not practice psychology or refer to themselves as psychologists. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Here is an example of Jordans behavior The legal record is what it is there is no debate. Look at the record here: 2009 Sordi case part 1 Dr. Peterson is a clinical, behavioural psychologist, with extensive training and experience in adult psychopathology, personality assessments, and cognitive assessments. HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING WHATSOEVER IN CUSTODY AND ACCESS ASSESSMENTS. DR. PETERSON IS NOT A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST. He does not take children as patients in his private practice. Almost all of his experience with children relates to those who have behavioural problems, which is not the case here. DR. PETERSON DID NOT EVER SEE THE APPLICANT, WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHILDREN AND HAD NO ACCESS TO ANY THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS OF OR ABOUT HER. Aside from what was set out in the Kawartha Family Court Assessment Service Report, all of his information about her came from the respondent. As is detailed on many occasions in Dr. Peterson’s various reports, that information was almost universally negative. Dr. Peterson himself admitted, when testifying during the voir dire, that his assessment of the respondent was one-sided and biased. HE ALSO SAID THAT HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE APPLICANT’S COMPETENCY AS A PARENT, AND THAT HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY COMPARE THE TWO PARTIES AS PARENTS. THOSE STATEMENTS ARE RATHER PUZZLING TO SAY THE LEAST SINCE HIS VARIOUS REPORTS ARE REPLETE WITH NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT HER PARENTING.
Is this another advertisement for Jordan? Jordan is a a fight instigator, and this suspended his license. DURING SUSPENSION, LICENSEES MAY NOT PRACTICE PSYCHOLOGY OR REFER TO THEMSELVES AS PSYCHOLOGISTS. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
You just posted the worst possible take on a series of different events. It is enough to rebut you by saying The dude use to do clinical practice, apparently was successful with his clients. The guy sticks to what he believes and stuck to it in the face of a corrupted decision makers/law makers. Like every other human some mistakes were made. Sounds like a pretty good guy by most metrics Also blindly following a group of credentialed decisions makers isn't always a good idea. Critical thinking goes along way especially when you realize how in this specific case much of the allegations were senseless. 🤷♂️
@@teamgab7432 The legal record is what it is there is no debate. Look at the record here: 2009 Sordi case part 1 Dr. Peterson is a clinical, behavioural psychologist, with extensive training and experience in adult psychopathology, personality assessments, and cognitive assessments. HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING WHATSOEVER IN CUSTODY AND ACCESS ASSESSMENTS. DR. PETERSON IS NOT A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST. He does not take children as patients in his private practice. Almost all of his experience with children relates to those who have behavioural problems, which is not the case here. DR. PETERSON DID NOT EVER SEE THE APPLICANT, WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHILDREN AND HAD NO ACCESS TO ANY THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS OF OR ABOUT HER. Aside from what was set out in the Kawartha Family Court Assessment Service Report, all of his information about her came from the respondent. As is detailed on many occasions in Dr. Peterson’s various reports, that information was almost universally negative. Dr. Peterson himself admitted, when testifying during the voir dire, that his assessment of the respondent was one-sided and biased. HE ALSO SAID THAT HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE APPLICANT’S COMPETENCY AS A PARENT, AND THAT HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY COMPARE THE TWO PARTIES AS PARENTS. THOSE STATEMENTS ARE RATHER PUZZLING TO SAY THE LEAST SINCE HIS VARIOUS REPORTS ARE REPLETE WITH NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT HER PARENTING.
One correction I would make to Dr. Petersons quip about Tiger Woods. He didn’t cheat WITH a Swedish Bikini model, he cheated ON a Swedish Bikini model.
It doesn’t invalidate his point that it’s easy to be pious when you don’t have any real temptations, but it’s very funny to think about cheating on someone who is by every measure gorgeous.
Christ is King, JP.
Really, I thought he was a humble person.
Moses is king
@@Maxmaxmax63 Wait, Moses was never a king either? He WAS a prince of Egypt. Never "anointed" to be a king.
@@stevengoldstein114 Mohamed is king?
@@Maxmaxmax63 Yes of Morroco, His Majesty King Mohamed VI emphasized that Morocco’s southern provinces have served as a link between Morocco and its African roots at the human, spiritual, cultural, and economic levels.. But where is the record that any other was annointed king?
Matt is the king of questions !
Hello Matt, and fellow community members.
Can we see a debate regarding the death penalty from 2 Catholic debaters? I’ve seen many that are in favor of it and many that are not. Thank you Matt for the work you do in regard to the channel, this has helped me significantly in my reconversion.
God bless
Thank you.
There's a reason why so many child actors end up becoming human train wrecks once they reach adulthood. Being bombarded with that level of attention hijacks the person's perception of the world. I mean, it's hard to envision someone in their 50s with all their life experience and wisdom suddenly becoming a clout chaser, even if they happen to be solipsistic.
You must do a Dostoevsky episode please and thank you
"Listen here BUDDY. If ya think you're gonna tie my tongue with the LOBSTER 🦞 dialectic, then you're in for a big FUQQIN polite surprise! An, ya know, that's an endeavor of dialogue! Ya know you aren't yourself without the responsibility of denying pride! BUDDY!"
Let JP speak brotha! Good interview tho
Sometimes it seems like JP is like Adam before the Lord blew his breath into him.
This is the third ad Jordan pushed on me on May 16
Jordan needs to address as part of a disciplinary probation order, a period of suspension may be imposed prior to the effective date of the probation. The Board's Disciplinary Guidelines provide details of the conditions under which a suspension may be made a part of the probation order. During suspension, licensees may not practice psychology or refer to themselves as psychologists. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request.
Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
Here is an example of Jordans behavior
The legal record is what it is there is no debate. Look at the record here:
2009 Sordi case part 1
Dr. Peterson is a clinical, behavioural psychologist, with extensive training and experience in adult psychopathology, personality assessments, and cognitive assessments. HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING WHATSOEVER IN CUSTODY AND ACCESS ASSESSMENTS.
DR. PETERSON IS NOT A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST. He does not take children as patients in his private practice. Almost all of his experience with children relates to those who have behavioural problems, which is not the case here.
DR. PETERSON DID NOT EVER SEE THE APPLICANT, WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHILDREN AND HAD NO ACCESS TO ANY THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS OF OR ABOUT HER. Aside from what was set out in the Kawartha Family Court Assessment Service Report, all of his information about her came from the respondent. As is detailed on many occasions in Dr. Peterson’s various reports, that information was almost universally negative. Dr. Peterson himself admitted, when testifying during the voir dire, that his assessment of the respondent was one-sided and biased. HE ALSO SAID THAT HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE APPLICANT’S COMPETENCY AS A PARENT, AND THAT HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY COMPARE THE TWO PARTIES AS PARENTS. THOSE STATEMENTS ARE RATHER PUZZLING TO SAY THE LEAST SINCE HIS VARIOUS REPORTS ARE REPLETE WITH NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT HER PARENTING.
Is this another advertisement for Jordan? Jordan is a a fight instigator, and this suspended his license. DURING SUSPENSION, LICENSEES MAY NOT PRACTICE PSYCHOLOGY OR REFER TO THEMSELVES AS PSYCHOLOGISTS. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request.
Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.
lol
You just posted the worst possible take on a series of different events.
It is enough to rebut you by saying
The dude use to do clinical practice, apparently was successful with his clients. The guy sticks to what he believes and stuck to it in the face of a corrupted decision makers/law makers.
Like every other human some mistakes were made.
Sounds like a pretty good guy by most metrics
Also blindly following a group of credentialed decisions makers isn't always a good idea. Critical thinking goes along way especially when you realize how in this specific case much of the allegations were senseless. 🤷♂️
You've posted this same bullshit on every JP video. Get a life.
@@teamgab7432it is legal records, and there is no debate or argument. The fact is Jordan fudged his work. And the courts found it.
@@teamgab7432 The legal record is what it is there is no debate. Look at the record here:
2009 Sordi case part 1
Dr. Peterson is a clinical, behavioural psychologist, with extensive training and experience in adult psychopathology, personality assessments, and cognitive assessments. HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING WHATSOEVER IN CUSTODY AND ACCESS ASSESSMENTS.
DR. PETERSON IS NOT A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST. He does not take children as patients in his private practice. Almost all of his experience with children relates to those who have behavioural problems, which is not the case here.
DR. PETERSON DID NOT EVER SEE THE APPLICANT, WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHILDREN AND HAD NO ACCESS TO ANY THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS OF OR ABOUT HER. Aside from what was set out in the Kawartha Family Court Assessment Service Report, all of his information about her came from the respondent. As is detailed on many occasions in Dr. Peterson’s various reports, that information was almost universally negative. Dr. Peterson himself admitted, when testifying during the voir dire, that his assessment of the respondent was one-sided and biased. HE ALSO SAID THAT HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE APPLICANT’S COMPETENCY AS A PARENT, AND THAT HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY COMPARE THE TWO PARTIES AS PARENTS. THOSE STATEMENTS ARE RATHER PUZZLING TO SAY THE LEAST SINCE HIS VARIOUS REPORTS ARE REPLETE WITH NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT HER PARENTING.