Thank you for sharing that. I have the 1.33 version and quite frankly I struggle to get a crisp image. I see that your images are quite soft. I'm still trying different lenses in the hope that I find something to make the adapter worth the money I paid. I also have the Rangefinder which makes the image even softer! it also extends or retracts as you focus, so can be awkward with a follow focus attached.
Hay man Thanks for the Video But What is the Difference Between 50 1.33 and 50 2.0 i Apologize i Am a Noob so i am trying to Figure This Out For My GH5 ( Obviously it is Squeezing it Closer / Titer but witch one is Better Thanks So Much
Thanks for sharing friend. I see a lot of softness and a sort of misalignment in the image, lots of CA too. What is the aperture, focal length, and lens type ? Are you shooting on an full frame A7S? Cheers
Hi Paul - Not a problem. Yes you're right, I think in my limited time shooting with the adapter there was some human error on my part in ensuring that the adapter was 100% aligned. For this example I was using a 75mm prime at F4 onwards (what SLR Magic recommend) on a FF Sony A7sII. I think the results will vary depending on what taking lens you use with this adapter - KH
Thanks KH ! Sounds great. I have seen some good results from the Anamorphot but you are right, it takes some trial and error. I think I may try the 1.33x-40 with a 50mm 1.1 soon.
hi, i have a GH5 -anamorphot -SLR lens 35mm -rangefinder and I can't have in my monitor the good wide format when I put setting"anamorphic 4/3 and the desquueze preview in gh5 , could you help me please
Hi Elio - The Anamorphot is used for when shooting in a 16:9 format. It basically 'squishes' the wide anamorphic image into a 16:9 image on the sensor. So, when you put your GH5 into the anamorphic 4:3 mode, you're not going to be getting the full anamorphic image, as you're restricting the 16:9 image the Anamorphot produces into the 4:3 window that the sensor is using in that mode. The Anamorphot is an adapter to be used on cameras that don't typically have anamorphic recording capabilities. The GH5 does have this ability, and that's what the 4:3 setting on it is designed for, however, this is to be used with the more 'traditional' anamorphic lenses that natively output a 4:3 image. Does that answer your question? Thanks - KH
Not a problem! Yes just use the normal recording mode. If you end up buying or using the more 'traditional' anamorphic lenses then use the 4/3 mode. Thanks for watching - KH
the out of focus regions looked horrible, chromatic aberration all over the place.. focus looked uneven too... for £900+ they can screw that! This video should have included additional shots in normal daylight conditions.. would have been interesting to see these issues clearly rather than using the night to cover them up!
That's why no one is really buying these. I haven't seen a single example of a shot with these adapters, or even whole SLR Ana Prime lenses, that is decent. Bad.
When I first saw this product on Andrew's EOSHD site, I wasn't won over, here also, sorry to say, I am not sold, but then I saw this footage: ruclips.net/video/imHEFVhoFQ4/видео.html (not mine) and this is mind blowing. The more I research this, the more I think the taking lens has a lot to do with acquiring great footage.
![Get the HOLLYWOOD Look with this Anamorphic Adapter | SLR Magic Anamorphot 40 1.33x [Compact]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CSyhFGORbSQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Get the HOLLYWOOD Look with this Anamorphic Adapter | SLR Magic Anamorphot 40 1.33x [Compact]](/img/tr.png)
this guys knows his stuff. nicely explained!
Brilliant! Best concise explanation of these adapters! Even Way better than what SLR Magic has said! Thanks for the review!
Thank you for sharing that. I have the 1.33 version and quite frankly I struggle to get a crisp image. I see that your images are quite soft. I'm still trying different lenses in the hope that I find something to make the adapter worth the money I paid. I also have the Rangefinder which makes the image even softer! it also extends or retracts as you focus, so can be awkward with a follow focus attached.
Thank you - an excellent introduction to anamorphic lenses.
so wich one should i get for a gh5 with metabones XL .64? THE crop or the full frame?
WORKS WITH FOUR-THIRDS MICRO LENSES?
Which anamorphot will work right with the Zeiss batis 18mm?
Such a helpful video. Thank you for sharing!
Hey , i use my Lumix GH5 , which Lense can i use with that SLR Magic 1.33x40??? i need speedbooster too?
Which version Anamorphot will work with a Fuji X series zoom lens, such as the XF18-135mmF3.5-5.6??
one more: what are the suggested lens for the SAME rig? (gh5+MBSBXL .64) does it count like a ff or mft? or what the math i should make? thank you
Your review was super helpful, thank you. Are there recommendations you have for anamorphic adapters in run and gun situations?
Hay man Thanks for the Video But What is the Difference Between 50 1.33 and 50 2.0 i Apologize i Am a Noob so i am trying to Figure This Out For My GH5 ( Obviously it is Squeezing it Closer / Titer but witch one is Better Thanks So Much
Thanks for sharing friend. I see a lot of softness and a sort of misalignment in the image, lots of CA too. What is the aperture, focal length, and lens type ? Are you shooting on an full frame A7S? Cheers
Hi Paul - Not a problem. Yes you're right, I think in my limited time shooting with the adapter there was some human error on my part in ensuring that the adapter was 100% aligned. For this example I was using a 75mm prime at F4 onwards (what SLR Magic recommend) on a FF Sony A7sII. I think the results will vary depending on what taking lens you use with this adapter - KH
Thanks KH ! Sounds great. I have seen some good results from the Anamorphot but you are right, it takes some trial and error. I think I may try the 1.33x-40 with a 50mm 1.1 soon.
No worries. Sounds good, let us know how you get on with it! KH
hi, i have a GH5 -anamorphot -SLR lens 35mm -rangefinder and I can't have in my monitor the good wide format when I put setting"anamorphic 4/3 and the desquueze preview in gh5 , could you help me please
Hi Elio - The Anamorphot is used for when shooting in a 16:9 format. It basically 'squishes' the wide anamorphic image into a 16:9 image on the sensor. So, when you put your GH5 into the anamorphic 4:3 mode, you're not going to be getting the full anamorphic image, as you're restricting the 16:9 image the Anamorphot produces into the 4:3 window that the sensor is using in that mode. The Anamorphot is an adapter to be used on cameras that don't typically have anamorphic recording capabilities. The GH5 does have this ability, and that's what the 4:3 setting on it is designed for, however, this is to be used with the more 'traditional' anamorphic lenses that natively output a 4:3 image. Does that answer your question? Thanks - KH
thanks a lot Wex !!! so I have just to record without this mode ans it's ok? I thought lost a lot information without the 4/3 mode ,
I'm looking for a wide angle lens( non-fisheyes) like 20mm to use with anamorphot , a cheaper one but quiet good ,any ideas? thank you again
Not a problem! Yes just use the normal recording mode. If you end up buying or using the more 'traditional' anamorphic lenses then use the 4/3 mode. Thanks for watching - KH
the out of focus regions looked horrible, chromatic aberration all over the place.. focus looked uneven too... for £900+ they can screw that! This video should have included additional shots in normal daylight conditions.. would have been interesting to see these issues clearly rather than using the night to cover them up!
my thoughts exactly
That's why no one is really buying these. I haven't seen a single example of a shot with these adapters, or even whole SLR Ana Prime lenses, that is decent. Bad.
When I first saw this product on Andrew's EOSHD site, I wasn't won over, here also, sorry to say, I am not sold, but then I saw this footage: ruclips.net/video/imHEFVhoFQ4/видео.html (not mine) and this is mind blowing. The more I research this, the more I think the taking lens has a lot to do with acquiring great footage.
its simpler to throw MB looks onto it... same streaks, same aberrations but save a 1000$...
Chromatic abberation all over the place!!!