Yes and all from the Democrats that mistakenly believe that will work, it will happen, and they will install a new style of government where they are in total control of everyone in the end, and everyone will be a subservient bitch. Apparently to be a Democrat, taking history is an elective.
When these criminals are released without cash bail, those who passed this law and the dumb governor who signed it into law, should be forced to compensate every family these criminals hurt after their release. Get out of jail free is stupid as can be!
The media is so uneducated - it makes the world such a dangerous place - so this lady has a $250,000 bond for assaulting her mother-in-law so badly she had to be hospitalized? So that’s ok? Putting someone in the hospital? Ridiculous.
No, a judge can absolutely keep a suspect in jail for pre trial detention if they pose a risk to other people. The decision will always be the judge's but it will be based on the crime. If they don't pose a risk to anyone ,only them will they be allowed to wait for their trial at home. (Most cases never go to trial.)
They said in the video it depends on the crime its up to the judge. or if the commit forcible felonies like murder battery burglary etc that is easy to prove or is a flight risk or poses a threat to public safety.
It’s depends on the crime. Someone in jail for a low level misdemeanor that can’t afford bail in a backed up court system and overcrowded prison will be released while those accused of murder, sexual assault and violent crime would most certainly be detained. But there is no reason our tax dollars should pay to house and feed someone accused of say bouncing a check or petty theft. I do think they should make a provision where people constantly accused of the saw low level crime repeatedly after being released for it should be held as well though. Someone who is a constant reoffender should be jailed until trial and or sentencing because they clearly haven’t learned. But someone sitting in jail over a bench warrant for missing court over a minor traffic violation is just us paying for them to stay there for no reason.
If you read the list of exclusions you would freak. How about "drug induced homicide" yeah so a buzzed out drug addict kills someone, nope, home you go, have a nice day.
In states that have eliminated cash bail, what happens when defendants don't show up for their court dates? At that point the defendants have likely broken the law twice for one incident. If the judges issue failure to appear warrants, who is going to be tasked with executing the new influx of warrants? Please don't say over-burdened police officers or deputies. They often can't handle the volume of court service now. The whole point of the bail system is that people who do not obey laws in most cases don't follow through on negative obligations. The cash bail system keeps them accountable.
Just an FYI- statistically speaking OK has a higher crime rate than IL. OK has more property crime in Tulsa alone while Chicago has more violent crime than Tulsa, but both are over the US average. And even when it comes to violent crime, Tulsa’s average is just a tad lower, like 1-2 points than Chicago’s….I say that to say this setting a bail does not guarantee that criminals stay behind bars, it guarantees those who cannot afford bail sits in jail. We need to come off the notion that people are guilty until proven innocent and that poverty is a crime
If they were going to do this on all non violent crimes and drug crimes that don't involve children, I could see this as a good idea. But this is beyond ridiculous...
Exactly! But what about the criminals breaking into stores and released! Chicago is already a crime pit being run by a useless mayor thats has same thought as the idiot Governor
Seems like the issue should be not locking people up with out any evidence what so ever of a crime being committed by that person. If someone is going around shooting people, robbing people, car jacking people and there is witnesses as well as video evidence, and they have the weapon or stolen property on them when the police catch them (that is evidence) that person should be locked behind bars as they wait for their trial as they have proven themselves to be a danger to others. Accusations against someone with out any evidence what so ever there is no reason to put the person you accused behind bars especially before they have their fair trial. Example: "So and So stole my car" But you never seen anyone take your car it is just missing anyone could of stolen it, and you do not have any security video. Police did not find your car in either their possession but you still want to press charges of theft because you spotted them a few days ago hanging out with each other around the "outside" of your garage on private property, but you never even had signs posted about the outside area of the garage being private property.
You are pretty naive, not sure just what world you live in, but there's this thing called "justifiable cause" that will be met before someone is even approached regarding crimes. Police don't just pull someones name out of a hat, and as far as "so and so stole my car" well, the me too society has been doing a wonderful job trashing men with just that from women claiming wrong doing with no physical evidence whatsoever, so, welcome to the poetic justice of your own design.
Some DAs won’t prosecute eventhough there is clear video evidence of them stealing. Also the issue of how long it takes for some crimes to go to court could take up to 3 years it’s not the next day in many instances would you want to risk a person who may or may not have committed a crime being free for that long.
The counties are not obeying this order. But some are obeying disarming people. Some won't disarm. Illinois will end up in a civil war if something isn't done.
This will set people straight, gain a good life off the facts they might not be able to tell if they can bond out as a threat with bond money so don't become a threat, improve your community or the state will do it for you
Cashless bail because the criminals can’t afford to put the money up for bail? Well an easier solution would be fr them to not break the law and they wouldn’t need bail. Are the Illinois lawmakers really that stupid??? APPARENTLY SO!!!!!!
They need to learn how to prosecute criminals when they have a history of stealing. It is also messed up to lock someone up for up to 4 years if they can't afford bail. Lock them up after a conviction.
Lol i love that they dont mention any facts of here case. No mention on how a bondsmen works. Gtfoh if you subscribe to this propaganda you are the problem
😭🤣😭😂 Y’ALL’s CRIME IS ABOUT TO BE MORE RECORD BREAKING THAN THE HEATWAVE. SAY BYE BYE PROPERTY VALUES. YOULL BE STUCK THERE TOO. THE HOUSING MARKET IS DRY. THERE AINT SHTT FOR SALE. NOBODYS MOVING NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOUR OFFERING.
Fast forward 2-3 years: IL declares martial law…National Guard invoke a curfew…..
Yes and all from the Democrats that mistakenly believe that will work, it will happen, and they will install a new style of government where they are in total control of everyone in the end, and everyone will be a subservient bitch. Apparently to be a Democrat, taking history is an elective.
crime has actually gone down
@@emmersaucedo5469 Ummm no…..crime is no longer being reported by libtard cities…hence the illusion…get educated kiddo!
Chicago is going to be screwed
Haha Chicago is already screwed.
When these criminals are released without cash bail, those who passed this law and the dumb governor who signed it into law, should be forced to compensate every family these criminals hurt after their release. Get out of jail free is stupid as can be!
The media is so uneducated - it makes the world such a dangerous place - so this lady has a $250,000 bond for assaulting her mother-in-law so badly she had to be hospitalized? So that’s ok? Putting someone in the hospital? Ridiculous.
So let me get this straight, if anyone commits ANY crime in this state from now on they get to go free on no bail until proven guilty in court?
No, a judge can absolutely keep a suspect in jail for pre trial detention if they pose a risk to other people. The decision will always be the judge's but it will be based on the crime. If they don't pose a risk to anyone ,only them will they be allowed to wait for their trial at home. (Most cases never go to trial.)
They said in the video it depends on the crime its up to the judge. or if the commit forcible felonies like murder battery burglary etc that is easy to prove or is a flight risk or poses a threat to public safety.
It’s depends on the crime. Someone in jail for a low level misdemeanor that can’t afford bail in a backed up court system and overcrowded prison will be released while those accused of murder, sexual assault and violent crime would most certainly be detained. But there is no reason our tax dollars should pay to house and feed someone accused of say bouncing a check or petty theft. I do think they should make a provision where people constantly accused of the saw low level crime repeatedly after being released for it should be held as well though. Someone who is a constant reoffender should be jailed until trial and or sentencing because they clearly haven’t learned. But someone sitting in jail over a bench warrant for missing court over a minor traffic violation is just us paying for them to stay there for no reason.
If you read the list of exclusions you would freak. How about "drug induced homicide" yeah so a buzzed out drug addict kills someone, nope, home you go, have a nice day.
In states that have eliminated cash bail, what happens when defendants don't show up for their court dates? At that point the defendants have likely broken the law twice for one incident. If the judges issue failure to appear warrants, who is going to be tasked with executing the new influx of warrants? Please don't say over-burdened police officers or deputies. They often can't handle the volume of court service now. The whole point of the bail system is that people who do not obey laws in most cases don't follow through on negative obligations. The cash bail system keeps them accountable.
@@gamedude1838no you don't lol why are you lying "gamerdude" lmao you nazis are seriously something else.
If you don't have money for bail then don't commit crimes.🤷
So the state with highest crime rate now wont incarcerate nice
Just an FYI- statistically speaking OK has a higher crime rate than IL. OK has more property crime in Tulsa alone while Chicago has more violent crime than Tulsa, but both are over the US average. And even when it comes to violent crime, Tulsa’s average is just a tad lower, like 1-2 points than Chicago’s….I say that to say this setting a bail does not guarantee that criminals stay behind bars, it guarantees those who cannot afford bail sits in jail. We need to come off the notion that people are guilty until proven innocent and that poverty is a crime
I am moving to Illinois now POP POP 💥💥 🔫 🏃💨😂😂
Chicagos about to get a whole lot worse
If your a career criminal, this is the state for you.
Returning Chicago to good Ole gangster days
Does that put an end to bail bond businesses.? It sure puts a dent in their pockets.
It doesn’t matter if anyone thinks it’s racist or not fair, this will not last long.
It’s a terrible idea, that’s for sure.
If they were going to do this on all non violent crimes and drug crimes that don't involve children, I could see this as a good idea. But this is beyond ridiculous...
why cant people answer yes or no ?? these criminals are commiting crimes on house arrest
Its a messed up system and there needs to be change, but oh god this is going to backfire. I've had enough of this state. Im out!
Anyone who is innocent and serves time should sue .
They do
That's normally the way it goes, rocket scientist.
Exactly! But what about the criminals breaking into stores and released! Chicago is already a crime pit being run by a useless mayor thats has same thought as the idiot Governor
Ain’t nothin to do with race ppl Give me a fkn break🤣🤣
Cash bail does nothing to make us safer. It just ensures that criminals with money can be released on bail.
I'm a livelong Democrat and I feel this decision is completely stupid.
Seems like the issue should be not locking people up with out any evidence what so ever of a crime being committed by that person. If someone is going around shooting people, robbing people, car jacking people and there is witnesses as well as video evidence, and they have the weapon or stolen property on them when the police catch them (that is evidence) that person should be locked behind bars as they wait for their trial as they have proven themselves to be a danger to others. Accusations against someone with out any evidence what so ever there is no reason to put the person you accused behind bars especially before they have their fair trial. Example: "So and So stole my car" But you never seen anyone take your car it is just missing anyone could of stolen it, and you do not have any security video. Police did not find your car in either their possession but you still want to press charges of theft because you spotted them a few days ago hanging out with each other around the "outside" of your garage on private property, but you never even had signs posted about the outside area of the garage being private property.
You are pretty naive, not sure just what world you live in, but there's this thing called "justifiable cause" that will be met before someone is even approached regarding crimes. Police don't just pull someones name out of a hat, and as far as "so and so stole my car" well, the me too society has been doing a wonderful job trashing men with just that from women claiming wrong doing with no physical evidence whatsoever, so, welcome to the poetic justice of your own design.
Some DAs won’t prosecute eventhough there is clear video evidence of them stealing. Also the issue of how long it takes for some crimes to go to court could take up to 3 years it’s not the next day in many instances would you want to risk a person who may or may not have committed a crime being free for that long.
Might as well put a gun shop next to the door of the local jail and the county one too
YOU MEAN SHE WAS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT.!!! Maybe that's what needs to change.
Bottom line is don't break the law. 🤣
The problem is not the bail. Its the laws. That is the problem. We have too many laws on the books.
In my area, bonds typically don't run that high.
That would mean you can be jailed for as long as its takes??????.....wtf you all voted in them seats......
This should go well
The counties are not obeying this order. But some are obeying disarming people. Some won't disarm. Illinois will end up in a civil war if something isn't done.
Get ready!
Is it still on hold are is it on place now
Then they cite NJ and NY as other states that have done similar 😂😂😂😂😂 as if those states are the goal
NM was actually the first state to eliminate cash bail. They did so in 2016 by way of a Constitutional amendment.
@Donnell0303So is New Jersey
Oh lord have mercy! Wtf...
Can’t do the time don’t do the crime
Is this JUSTICE????
This will set people straight, gain a good life off the facts they might not be able to tell if they can bond out as a threat with bond money so don't become a threat, improve your community or the state will do it for you
Criminas your day has come. Crime is no longer crime. Robocop city anyone!
California did it in 2018.
Cashless bail because the criminals can’t afford to put the money up for bail? Well an easier solution would be fr them to not break the law and they wouldn’t need bail. Are the Illinois lawmakers really that stupid??? APPARENTLY SO!!!!!!
They need to learn how to prosecute criminals when they have a history of stealing. It is also messed up to lock someone up for up to 4 years if they can't afford bail. Lock them up after a conviction.
Well i guess a Debit or Ctedit Card will work then.
That seems a steep bail for a simple assault
Innocent til proven guilty, everyone deserves their day in court. 🤷🏽♀️
Now it will really burn...
Bail is needed because if the bail is high and the person paid you need to seek the money it can be bad money
Dividing the world into elites vs pawns. Middle class is a pawn.
Sheriff dart has always been a joke. Dude exists only in this democratic utopia.
He only has buzzwords
If the law is unfair with the bail, don't break the law! You know Illinois is screwed. Look at LA and NY.
WOW
I agree move slowly
I feel so bad for the innocent people serving time in Illinois prison
Lol i love that they dont mention any facts of here case. No mention on how a bondsmen works. Gtfoh if you subscribe to this propaganda you are the problem
⚡️
Should not have gotten into an altercation. Quit being ratchet and be civil.
As with anything there will be good and bad with thi's decision. But I believe its the right step to take and long in coming.
Until one of your love ones are murdered by one of these little victims or invaded your home and traumatized your family
You are severely fucked up if you think any good will come from this.
GOD BLESS PRESIDENT LIGHTFOOT"!!🙏
It was the governor's decision not Lightfoot
@@RoundzMusic they all support his horse sh*t, what are you on?
Let bettlejuices forehead beam in brilliance
stupidity at its finest
😭🤣😭😂 Y’ALL’s CRIME IS ABOUT TO BE MORE RECORD BREAKING THAN THE HEATWAVE. SAY BYE BYE PROPERTY VALUES. YOULL BE STUCK THERE TOO. THE HOUSING MARKET IS DRY. THERE AINT SHTT FOR SALE. NOBODYS MOVING NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOUR OFFERING.
LOL. RIP ILLINOIS
:(