Concentrations Part 5 - serial dilution

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 116

  • @naseemakhter8602
    @naseemakhter8602 6 лет назад +1

    best video I ever see. Really I saw a lot of viideos but could not understand dilution which you teach me in one minute. Awesome. thanks a lot

  • @jessiegonzalezhuert1
    @jessiegonzalezhuert1 6 лет назад +39

    You have an extra zero on your 7th tube as a result you also have an extra zero in your 8th tube . You went from 3 zeros to five

  • @prashantkumarparmanu
    @prashantkumarparmanu 4 года назад

    Best teacher for the lab calculation lesson . Thanks a lot Sir .

  • @ThePingy27
    @ThePingy27 11 лет назад +47

    my right ear feels lonely. besides that great video!

  • @clairewhite4536
    @clairewhite4536 8 лет назад

    best explanation I've seen so far. Thanks

  • @arishtat4523
    @arishtat4523 14 лет назад +3

    Greate series. I'm a little confused about the total volumes, though. In the end, doesn't well 8 contain a total of 300µl and all other wells 270µl?

  • @leaderofpeace
    @leaderofpeace 13 лет назад +1

    @Arishtat you are correct to say that the volumes are 300 uL because the dilution is always calculated with the total volume (30 + 270) then that is intern used for the stock

  • @Noveleffect
    @Noveleffect 12 лет назад +1

    Beautifully explained---clear, and easy to follow. Excellent! Thank you! :)

  • @smartaleck05
    @smartaleck05 13 лет назад +1

    I have a practical test tomorrow, and this really helped! Thanks.

  • @dimaabuelainain7670
    @dimaabuelainain7670 4 месяца назад

    This was very helpful! Thank you so much!!

  • @thehh5118
    @thehh5118 8 лет назад +33

    0.0001->0.000001?Isn't it 0.00001

    • @ninakh7427
      @ninakh7427 5 лет назад +2

      The Hh yes its a mistake

  • @gkpeter
    @gkpeter  14 лет назад

    @Arishtat Yes, so that is why you have to think ahead. For example if I was using this dilution series for a standard curve and I need triplicates of 100 uL, it wouldn't work.

  • @jaz499
    @jaz499 Год назад

    how do you find the concentration of each well?

  • @jetrojuanico4389
    @jetrojuanico4389 3 года назад

    is it possible to reverse the equation to produced concentrated solutions?

  • @pulockpaul7888
    @pulockpaul7888 3 года назад

    How would you determine the concentration now?

  • @naboria5
    @naboria5 5 лет назад

    Thank you very much. It helped me with my Research Project. I needed to construct a calibration curve for my project.

  • @ss4vegeta1
    @ss4vegeta1 9 лет назад +7

    I dont get the 1microliter/100L at the end part. How did you get that?

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 лет назад +1

      You probably don't need the explanation now, but.... 1micoL/100L is equal to (1x10^-6)/100L= 0.00000001microG/microL or 100,000,000x dilution.

  • @sian2982
    @sian2982 5 лет назад +1

    Sir, in stock the conc is 100 microgm/ 1micro liter. From 1microliter how u take 30 microliter?

  • @jordanfrederick6155
    @jordanfrederick6155 8 лет назад

    How did you know how many tubes to use? especially if you aren't given wells to pipette in.

  • @hwasa8956
    @hwasa8956 4 года назад

    What is the concentration for each of the dilution

  • @brea1443
    @brea1443 12 лет назад

    Can you explain what happens if you were to use different dilutions from well 2 on?

  • @sephorambuyi1877
    @sephorambuyi1877 6 лет назад

    How to calculate the concentration of dye present in each dilution?

  • @samixa7
    @samixa7 9 лет назад +5

    Thank you Greg. Clear explanation! I have one question (may be it sounds stupid). How does well 1-7 have 300 ul final volume. We started with 270 ul and added 30 ul to well 1. But, after that we pipetted out 30 ul to well 2 from well 1. Then, well 1 should have 270 ul as before, right ? Please enlighten me.

    • @adaudaya3211
      @adaudaya3211 9 лет назад +1

      you're right

    • @muhammadishtiaq5712
      @muhammadishtiaq5712 9 лет назад +5

      +Samiksha Ghimire Once we make require concentration , then we can take any volume from the vial, it does not matter...

    • @rajatbhatt6399
      @rajatbhatt6399 7 лет назад

      but during measurment of turbidity it will

    • @khalidbashir4033
      @khalidbashir4033 6 лет назад

      absolutely right

  • @jamiedaly6065
    @jamiedaly6065 9 лет назад +3

    Thanks for the fantastic help with the video but I hope you don't mind it's I just have a few questions to ask:
    Does the dilution factor form a geometric sequence in the form 10 x 10^n-1 for each beaker you diluted?
    Secondly, shouldn't the last dilution be 0.000001ug/uL (1x10^-6) because you started from 100ug/uL and diluted it by 10x for 8 turns?
    If you could provide answers to this then that would be fantastic!
    Thank you :)

  • @iarue
    @iarue 13 лет назад

    Hello nice video. I understand most of it apart from where u talked about the other way of doing it instead of pippeting it out using the serial dilution. Then u mention 1ul of stock/100 L H20. I was wondering if u could explain how u derived those numbers. Thanks

  • @polo619652
    @polo619652 12 лет назад

    We're supposed to find out that if I take 5mL from a 10mL sample substance, mix it into 10mL of water (the outcome would be 1:3), then take 5mL of that 1:3 solution and mix it with the original sample substance, then which one would have a higher concentration based on it's original substance?

  • @Mariaalvarezrial
    @Mariaalvarezrial 7 лет назад

    the best explanation!!! you are GOD!!! I am Spanish and you explain better than my stupid teacher jajajaja xx .

  • @devanggondaleeya4321
    @devanggondaleeya4321 4 года назад

    If solutions contain 100ug/ul and then you take 30 ul from it so how much amount of substance in 30 ul?

  • @nareshvasani
    @nareshvasani 14 лет назад

    Formula for Dilution factor is Final volume by Aliquot volume.
    This is correct or not please let me know.

  • @lizzyinthahizzy
    @lizzyinthahizzy 10 лет назад

    So you multiplied the dilution factor of 1/10 by the original stock to get 10 microliter/ mL in the first box? And then proceeded to multiply 10 by 1/10 to get the second box? Also, did you change tips after each dilution? thnx.

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 лет назад

      There's no need to change tips. You are literally transferring the same solution from one beaker to the next.

  • @eldonjulesgalang2667
    @eldonjulesgalang2667 11 лет назад

    what if the amount of sample you will serial transfer from one well to the next well is not consistent? e.g from first well is 30 micro-liter then the next is 20 micro-liter how will you compute for the final diluting factor?

  • @yathatisgood
    @yathatisgood 9 лет назад +2

    Hi there.
    I want to dilute sodium hypochlorite 5%/1litre to 1.5%/1litre but I m struggling with the maths.
    Could you please write down your workings
    I think the answer is 4 parts water and 1part sodium hypochlorite
    Kind regards
    Steve

  • @thechannelthatjustsubstoev960
    @thechannelthatjustsubstoev960 9 лет назад

    why do you jump from microlitres to ml, say at 4:38?

    • @johnpham747
      @johnpham747 9 лет назад +2

      If you watch for 10 more seconds he fixes it to Micro liter

  • @lilmsyumi
    @lilmsyumi 8 лет назад +1

    Final volume is 270 microliter. 30:270=1:9. Isn't it 9 times? not net times?

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 лет назад +1

      The total volume of solution is 300 um once the 30 um of stock solution is added to the 270 um of water. 30:300 = 1:10

  • @ceosajid
    @ceosajid 4 года назад +1

    thank you for this video !

  • @김지수-x7v
    @김지수-x7v 5 лет назад

    I have a question for you. Is stock undiluted solution...?plz reply T.T

  • @aliceincokes
    @aliceincokes 6 лет назад +7

    This really helped me a lot to understand the topic! I appreciate the application. However, I just noticed a little mistake of what you did in the illustration which confused the viewers. You said that the final volume (which is the volume of the last test tube) was 300 uL yet you drew a line which was misunderstood by your viewers because they thought all the test tubes have 300 uL when the rest has 270 uL except the last test tube. Anyway, great tutorial!!! Please post more.

  • @doogiedog1234
    @doogiedog1234 12 лет назад

    Why cant u just discard the extra 30ul from the last tube?

  • @S19D4H8
    @S19D4H8 9 лет назад +1

    Can you make a video showing how to calculate it going backwards. For example, what if your stock solution was an "Unknown concentration" and the concentration of the final test tube was 10. How would you do the math to compute the concentration of the substance inside the stock solution?

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 лет назад

      In this example, the dilution factor is 10. All you have to do is multiply your final concentration by the dilution factor (10) to calculate the concentration of the preceding solution. You would repeat this step, calculating backwards until you finally get to your stock solution.

  • @DA-sj2gw
    @DA-sj2gw 8 лет назад

    If I have the following solution: 3x capture antigen (dilute with 1x PBS). Does this mean that I have to dilute it or is it already diluted?

  • @inluvwithgod
    @inluvwithgod 10 лет назад +9

    Hey I have a question for you. This may be silly. I know you initially placed 30ul into the first mircrotube. but then you took out 30 ul. why is the total volume still 300 ul? wouldn't it be 270? and the last tube contain 300ul?

    • @xraydelta
      @xraydelta 10 лет назад

      I had this same question as I was watching.

    • @randomhobbyist
      @randomhobbyist 10 лет назад +12

      -I think your issue is in calculating concentration. Which volume do you use? 270 or 300. If i'm right keep reading :)
      -Yes. the new volume for that container is 270ul. However, when you made the mixture the total volume was 300. Removing volume after the fact doesn't change the concentration. If you make a new mixture - freeze. calculate concentration with that.
      -analogy: When you pour a glass of orange juice, the orange juice in the jug has the same concentration there is just less volume. you didn't dilute the orange juice.
      -hopefully that helps :)

    • @inluvwithgod
      @inluvwithgod 9 лет назад

      thanks it does,

    • @j246802
      @j246802 7 лет назад +4

      This is a satisfactory explanation. When any tube was first diluted after addition of 30 uL from the previous tube and was for a moment at 300 ul. After the then diluted product was removed from the 300 uL the final volume was 270 ul. At both 300 ul level after the initial 30 was added AND at 270 AFTER the 30 was removed for the next tube the concentration remain the same. The exact volumes after dilutions are complete might be useful for downstream analyses, but does not affect concentrations. You could take 30 from the very last dilution and discard it, and then all tubes would have appropriate concentrations and all would have 270 ul of sample remaining.

  • @PurpleNoodles
    @PurpleNoodles 7 лет назад

    This was helpful! Thank you so much for this video

  • @24hrsport65
    @24hrsport65 9 лет назад

    I do have unclear idea on this. when we serially dilute each tube with the same amount, but the final tube becomes 10ml and the other will be 9ml. so how can we make the last tube 9ml?

    • @adaudaya3211
      @adaudaya3211 9 лет назад +2

      just take out the 1ml of the final tube

  • @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417
    @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417 6 лет назад

    Hello..excellent videos more examples PLEASE..

  • @Memol-v7l
    @Memol-v7l 9 лет назад +16

    I believe you made a mistake. you would need to get rid of the 30microL from the last tube to keep the volume 270ml in all tubes.

    • @jaster_mereel7657
      @jaster_mereel7657 6 лет назад +5

      That does not really matter because the concentration does not change. If you reduce the last volume to 270microL it is still the same concentration. So why waste 30microL?

    • @khalidbashir4033
      @khalidbashir4033 6 лет назад

      but in case of elisa .....concentration matters a lot

  • @alyuntariq9340
    @alyuntariq9340 8 лет назад

    OK so basically that means that in serial dilution it doesn't matter for the concentrations of all the tubes to be of the same concentration?!! that because the volume of water remains the same ....ryte?

  • @alliyam283
    @alliyam283 3 года назад

    Can somebody please explain why the concentration of tube 1 is 10ug/uL and tube tube concentration is 1ug/uL. Shouldn’t the concentration of tube 1 be 0.1ug/uL??

  • @naomikpogho563
    @naomikpogho563 8 лет назад +1

    why would it be 1 microlitres of stock to 100 L of H20 why isn't is 100 microlitres

  • @mr.g-joy893
    @mr.g-joy893 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks. I get the solution to dilute

  • @firestorm210
    @firestorm210 5 лет назад

    So the DF is the 30=300/Vi? And that’s how he got the 1/10? Sense it’s volume it would be DF=Vf/Vi And that’s how he got the DF as 1/10?

  • @amandaluongo2112
    @amandaluongo2112 9 лет назад

    THANK YOU FOR THIS :) I totally understand now!!!

  • @rajatbhatt6399
    @rajatbhatt6399 7 лет назад

    how total volume of solution in each tube became 300micro liter
    you added 30 micro liter to 270 micro liter then subsequently you removed 30 from each so it should become 270 again but you have written 300

    • @AmandaLovesOldFords
      @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 лет назад

      300 um was the final volume of the new solution produced. You calculate the concentration of that solution, then dilute it to make the next solution.

  • @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417
    @estelamestellaestellaiscry4417 4 года назад

    Thanks very helpful. More. Samples ..

  • @SaurabhKumar-hj3jf
    @SaurabhKumar-hj3jf 4 года назад

    Serial dilution for bacteria was given by..................... Pls give me answer as soon as

  • @joeyrousselle6086
    @joeyrousselle6086 6 лет назад

    Great stuff, thanks!

  • @gkpeter
    @gkpeter  15 лет назад

    Your right, thanks. I will annotate that later. Good catch.

  • @alovesherdoggie
    @alovesherdoggie 10 лет назад

    i mean like I kinda get it, but uggh the whole like 10 to the negative exponent thingy still confuses me, you didn't touch base on that :(

  • @gordonh9921
    @gordonh9921 3 года назад

    Thank you

  • @ThangHuynh10
    @ThangHuynh10 12 лет назад +2

    No need to change tips in between wells here (I think).

    • @jeeva1996
      @jeeva1996 4 года назад

      yh, you can keep the same tip in this case

  • @razmossis
    @razmossis 5 лет назад

    The final concentration is 1uL in 10L, not 100L

  • @mahmoudzulaihatabdullahi642
    @mahmoudzulaihatabdullahi642 6 лет назад

    wow! I get it now! thank you!

  • @akremirania9131
    @akremirania9131 6 лет назад

    Excellent,explanation,thank,u,sir,

  • @JJoverlee1
    @JJoverlee1 11 лет назад +5

    The seventh dilution is wrong.

  • @joeschmoe8263
    @joeschmoe8263 12 лет назад

    You changed units from micro liters to milli liters when you were writing out the dilution, good explanation though.

  • @lilymoore3955
    @lilymoore3955 8 лет назад

    You're awesome! thanks!

  • @jeffreybarrett7909
    @jeffreybarrett7909 7 лет назад

    thank you for the upload

  • @user-ashlyn44
    @user-ashlyn44 2 года назад

    THANKYOU

  • @mypeniscanjetfire
    @mypeniscanjetfire 13 лет назад

    Thank you very much.

  • @mahmoudhilali5557
    @mahmoudhilali5557 8 лет назад

    Science IV - Well done!

  • @abokhalid9460
    @abokhalid9460 6 лет назад

    i beleive that what you have done is wrong coz
    1- final volum is 270 it is not 300 since you have subsequently removed 30 from the first tube and diluted it in each tube and you should have throw it after last tube.
    2- to do 1/10 dilution of total volum 300 you should add 33 of stock and 333 of diluent (solut/slolvent+solute=33/300+33 =0.099 =approx 1/10=0.1)
    3- then you can add 300 of diluent and then 33 of stock and subsquent dilution so the total volum will be 300 in each tube
    4- what you have done is good for one step dilution not serial! 1/10 = 300/10 = 30 - 300 =270+30 which is coreect for one step dilution.

  • @kalemcep2518
    @kalemcep2518 9 лет назад

    Very helpful,thanks :)

  • @redarmuhammad1953
    @redarmuhammad1953 10 лет назад

    GREAT VID

  • @razaneaoufi7765
    @razaneaoufi7765 4 года назад

    but each time you take 30 you will not have at the end 300 in all the tube!

  • @ashimqc
    @ashimqc 14 лет назад

    thanks

  • @lenininsuasti9936
    @lenininsuasti9936 11 лет назад

    Excelente!!! Gracias

  • @amirulfaez8437
    @amirulfaez8437 8 лет назад

    U THE BEST...THANK U

  • @jessicawhite6369
    @jessicawhite6369 11 лет назад

    Thank you!

  • @bryannaribeiro136
    @bryannaribeiro136 2 года назад

    You added an extra zero in your 7th tube. The final stock dilution should be 0.000001 ug/uL

  • @dr.husseint.altamimi6589
    @dr.husseint.altamimi6589 12 лет назад

    nice video

  • @603fofo
    @603fofo 13 лет назад

    Thank u so much !!!

  • @banz66
    @banz66 11 лет назад +2

    merci de france

  • @caleb1102
    @caleb1102 3 года назад

    you added an extra zero going from well 6 to 7

  • @purplepick1
    @purplepick1 12 лет назад

    THANKS!!

  • @B4IRUTUARU16
    @B4IRUTUARU16 11 лет назад

    My left ear enjoyed that

  • @بتولمجبل-غ1ل
    @بتولمجبل-غ1ل 6 лет назад

    👍💛

  • @hydersinada1566
    @hydersinada1566 12 лет назад

    اهلين ياحلوين

  • @joeschmoe8263
    @joeschmoe8263 12 лет назад

    whoops, spoke to soon i see you corrected it

  • @AmandaLovesOldFords
    @AmandaLovesOldFords 7 лет назад +1

    There are so many mistakes in this video... all you're doing is confusing people. You should just take this video down.

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 лет назад

      I can see why you find it confusing (maybe the fact that he's adding the 270microL first?) but the dilutions are correct.

    • @darieldiaz2106
      @darieldiaz2106 7 лет назад

      Also, maybe instead of just saying that there are mistakes, how about just pointing them out?

  • @eegg020
    @eegg020 4 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @MOTIIFkeys823
    @MOTIIFkeys823 9 лет назад

    Thank you kind sir.