CA AW BAN DESTROYED WITH ONE SIMPLE PRODUCT! - FIFY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- RUclips DISCLAIMER:
ALL FIREARMS ARE UNLOADED AND LEGAL. FIREARM IS BEING HANDLED BY A TRAINED PROFESSIONAL USING 10 ROUND MAGS PER RUclips GUIDELINES. NO LINKS OR PARTS ARE BEING SOLD OR PROMOTED.
The FIFY is a fixed magazine system to keep your AR legal...and gavin newsom wont be happy about this.
💪 🧪BEST PRE WORKOUT/Protein Powder- 🧪💪
10% off code: RENO - gorillamind.co...
👕 MERCH (anything you buy supports me!) - 👕
🩺⚕️ Health Optimization and TRT 🩸💉
marekhealth.co...
CODE RENO - 10% off first lab panel!!!
🎒CONCEALABLE BACKPACK BODY ARMOR🎒
premierbodyarm...
Code: RENOMAY - 10% off
💬 Support the channel/join the discord 💬
www.subscribes...
Pro-2A Coffee Company - Code: RENO = 10% off
www.blackoutco...
HOME GYM EQUIPMENT: amzn.to/3vH4G2N
links may be affiliate links
cant link the FIFY website so check these forum posts!
drive.google.c...
/ thoughts_on_this_fify_... .
Send things to my Mailbox:
Reno May
2661 Santa Rosa Ave
#211
Santa Rosa, CA 95407
United States
Hey everyone for some reason the RUclips algorithm decided to start showing this video to people. There is an updated video about the doj sending sky tac a cease and desist!
Well damn, but hey you get more views on both.
You might want to put the link to the video in this comment.
Yeah, this popped up on my feed again. It's frickin' weird man. It's like they are trying to screw people over into a bottomless pit of legal issues.
Still watched. Screw the CA DOJ. Keep up the good fight.
We the People need to send a cease and desist letter to Gavin Nuisance with an ultimatum attached to it.
CA's laws are so asinine that people are reinventing the wheel
Literally adding a miniature fully functional fixed magazine to a firearm so it technically has a fixed mag. This is genius.
Where's there's a will for whatever there's away.
Glad they are.
They give us asinine laws we give them asinine solutions!😅
I think since it’s technically legal the DA and judge would be 😡, lol.
This is such a “I’m not ACTUALLY touching you” moment, I LOVE it. Get some California…
Kudos to the inventors of FIFY, but at this point, I'm not interested in yet _another_ novel (and likely, only temporary) workaround to California's specious, and utterly *_asinine,_* cosmetic feature-based semi-auto ban. I want to see the asinine ban *_overturned,_* once and for all.
I'm currently stuck in the People's Republic of Kommiefornia, and I'll be buying and using several of these! Semper Fidelis!
Well said.
@@Snapper314 At this point you know you are fd even if this is not challenged it will be something else. Move away deprive commifornia from your tax dollars so they fail as a state.
it is and I love it.
This is crazy if Ca attorney general let’s this fly I will buy one and donate it to a Ca resident who needs one.
me too
Me too. Wonder if this would work in ny
Yee
I'll take two. Thanks.
@@kole6146 sorry I can only afford one and we have see if it flys first. I’m betting they will be outlawed soon.
I would not want to be the first defendant going in front of a judge trying to explain this thing. Pretty much no way in hell a CA judge is gonna let this slide.
Lol exactly, way too much trouble than it's worth
Incorrect. Most judges in CA are extremely conservative. LA or San Francisco not so much.
@@MySpaceSucks3 Incorrect? You stated it yourself - LA or San Francisco. The other parts of CA, the conservative portions, the still part of America areas, won't be the ones prosecuting this. It'll be an LA or San Francisco judge. So, no, his statement wasn't incorrect.
uncompliance is the only answer to fixing things.
If someone is not willing to stand in the line of fire then nothing will be done.
This is one of the biggest "but its technically legal" things I've seen the firearms industry passive aggressively throw at California.
Bought mine, even if it ends up quickly being banned somehow by CA, I will support ANY pro-2A company willing to go the extra mile for us CA residents in the fight against tyranny.
You probably got the last one. I couldn't even get that cute little mag.
banned? ban what?
@@SoloRenegade Oh FFS, it's an internet comment on youtube, not some legal term. Everyone with at least an ounce of intelligence knows what it meant. Go troll somewhere else and vote democrat.
@@romel420 wow, you're not too bright are you? I never vote democrat. You can't ban something that isn't illegal. screws and a 5rnd mag are legal in CA. try using your brain more. No wonder CA is the way it is when the Democrat's only opposition is people like you.
If your goal is to fight tyranny, then you already lost. You already know how to fight it. This isn't it. Tens of millions of cowards getting exactly what they earned.
They say you need a fixed mag on the weapon. They didn't say what kind of magazine, nor did they specify it had to be the magazine your weapon system feeds from. This is just passive aggressive enough that it seems perfect for California.
A second buffer tube in the stock with a rolled up Playboy would make a fixed magazine, and give you something to read while cleaning the gun.
One can and will assume the magazine in question is the one related to the firearm working. This dumb logic is akin to just duct taping another piece of gear to the rifle to claim it negates another piece of gear. It doesn't. Throw a drum round on an AR and go to a range, I dare you.
@@andyk939 assumptions don't go far in court. I wouldn't test it myself, because there's no way this won't result in a lengthy and expensive court case for someone, but as the law is written it seems all good.
The law/description of what an assault weapon is says "capacity to accept a detachable magazine" so I feel like this whole thing does nothing to actually change that. Note how that law firm they asked confirmed that it was a fixed mag, not that it would affect anything relating to assault weapon classification
The definition of assault weapon is different by state. In NY it is “capable of accepting a detachable mag”, so this wouldn’t work. In CA it is “does not have a fixed magazine”, so the trick is valid.
Reno is such a great lawyer. His legal advice is top notch👍🏼
What if he said I'm not a lawyer but this is legal advice? how could he be held accountable if someone is dumb enough to follow that advice? like, "I'm not an engineer but here's my plans to build a skyscraper." anyone dumb enough to use those plans should be held accountable not the person claiming not to be an engineer.
Reno JUST SAID, multiple times, he is NOT a lawyer. Are you okay?
@@1TruePatriot r/whoosh
@@moonshinethics I think it's not so much to protect him from his listeners, but rather to protect him from prosecution of recommending something illegal when CA decides they don't like this device.
@@aaronshippelhoute5011 yea but by him saying "this is not legal advice" implies that it is illegal advice. So that's right there should implicate him.
Politicians and judges still can’t understand what a fully semiautomatic weapon is, I’d hate to be the one in court trying to explain this.
They just need to give up. The people will always prevail and find loopholes
"...and find freedom"
@@bolshoibooze8010 murica!
They should never have started to begin with, now it's just driving innovation to overcome their stupid laws to begin with, pretty much Ouroboros.
You can only give so many excuses until the wolf eats you.
Loophole? I just see an honest attempt at following the law. Hahahaha
Not a bad product. one could just say to hell with California's "laws." The damned politicians don't even follow the laws that they put in place much of the time
According to California itself, damn near everything there causes cancer and I believe it. I think the better option is to not go to or get out of California, it's a poisonous place.
If the tens of millions of people there had any cajones, which they don't, they'd delete all the politicians and the voters that made this level of tyranny possible. Those fires are deserved. Maybe they're even god's wrath for the extreme cowardice displayed by, again, tens of millions of people.
I have no sympathy, no pity, no care about that state. You find yourself exactly where you put yourself. I had to learn that when I was homeless. No one else seems to have learned the lesson. That's all on them.
This sounds like me when I'm justifying purchases to my wife. "Actually you stated I couldn't spend $2k, you didn't saying anything about $1997.00.."
🤣🤣🤣
To each his/her own, but I would never let a woman tell me what to do with my finances. Last I checked, I'm the trading and real estate genius, here. Think I know what I can and can't buy, thanks.
@@manictiger This. I'll never understand men saying the wife won't LET them but something with THEIR OWN MONEY that they EARNED THEMSELVES. The shear audacity, gal, and entitlement of women is just astounding.
@@smithsmith1956 because when you have a family or marriage it's our money even when they didn't earn it. But if the household is taken care of then buying what you want is warranted.
@@GM6.7 By definition, If she didn't earn it, it isn't hers. She's not the one the check is signed to. And you're an example of how people have been conditioned to accept that nonsense. Women see the man's money as hers and hers alone. The reason they get pi$$y when the man spends it is because that means THEY have less to spend. They want all of it. And without doing anything for it.
I'm so glad I don't live in CA and have to worry about this.
Yet
I thought the same about 3 years ago…In Illinois
You don't have to live in CA (think north two states) to have your work-around that met the current regulation(s) get declared illegal without going through the state legislature, as mandated. The regulating agency just "redefines" the definitions of components and procedures to bend the regulations to cover any new work-around for small-scale suction dredging for gold. Our Federal agencies use this same over-reach technique, and in my case, to cater to special interest "environmental terrorist" organizations with a "sue and settle" strategy to fund their organizations with tax payer's money.
@@lousmith5264 - Washington State has gone full commie (sad). It's even more sad because Washington State has some of the best semi-auto centerfire rifle manufacturers in the nation. I guess they didn't bribe the politicians and/ or Attorney General properly.
Regardless of what I may think about the laws themselves, someone's going to jail over this.
Yeah they have a way of changing the rules/fine print and then arresting people over it.
I LOVE this, I'm not a CA resident, but I absolutely LOVE using tricks of the law like this to screw over authoritarian douchbags. I learned long ago through various courtroom experiences that intent, belief, actual guilt, etc. mean nothing to the law. It's about the letter, what the actual words actually say and in that regard this is brilliant!
The law regarding featureless "assault weapons" says "capable of accepting a detachable magazine".
Having one fixed and one detachable doesnt mean they magically cancel eachother out. It simply must be able to accept a detachable magazine. Thats what the words actually say. This entire idea was DOA from the beginning. Not saying I agree with it, but this has the potential to cause someone some legal trouble.
@@joey_cola
Exactly. If it says it can’t accept a detachable magazine… it can’t accept a detachable magazine. Period.
I’m not a CA resident. I’m not familiar with any of their laws so I’m going based on your comment and from what I’ve heard from other videos. I don’t see this “device” flying for very long. I see what they are doing with something like this though. Because, if it does fly, it proves the fallacy of CA’s gun laws and it could be a catalyst in restoring Californians firearm rights. I just don’t see that happening though.
@@joey_cola A DRUM is not a magazine, so STILL complies.
@@robertsmith2956 A drum is an "ammunition storage device that feeds said ammunition into a firearm, through the use of a follower (usually spring loaded)." That's why it's called a drum _magazine._
@@TheCharleseye As long as you pull the trigger they don't store anything.
The law doesn't say it had to be a functional ammo feeding device. It also doesn't say you can't have more than one ammo feeding devices connected to the gun.
⚜️Saint Benitez ⚜️will be giving us a good Christmas this year 🎅 so just hold tight for a couple more months.
exactly i'm not a lawyer but i see to remember reading that in a case like this, its what's written, and now where is it written (to my knowledge) that the magazine has actually feed into the weapon. just that it has to be fixed to the weapon.
@@wolfpreist Not to mention that the rifle isn't chambered for .22RL.
If it's an AR they're typically labeled as "multi-caliber" on the paperwork.
@@cjanquart but it can shoot the .22
@@cjanquart That's not really qute correct. It takes me on the order of 30-35 seconds between firing a round of .223/5.56, drop the mag, clear the rifle, break it open and remove the BCG, drop the CMMG .22LR conversion bolt in its place, close it up, put in the .22LR mag, yank the CH, and firing a round of .22LR from the same rifle, whenever the urge happens to take me. About the same going from .22LR to .223/5.56. Dunno about yours, but I think mine chambers .22LR just peachy-keen fine :) I actually shoot more .22LR through it for the cheap practice factor. Just means needing to brush things down more often, what with how dirty it is - really proves the old adage that the AR platform "shits where it eats". That's OK. Means if I clean my bang-stick once in a while, I can still afford to get off a few K rounds of practice that would cost too dear if I was shooting .223/5.56.
“If you’re driving around with any gun in the state of California, try not to get stopped by the cops in any way shape or form”. Sir, that isn’t just for California. That, is a universal truth.
This state was so different 30 yrs ago. I was stopped several times with firearms without ammo...that was key back then. Etiquette is also a must
@@Dogleg1957 without ammo huh??? Lmfao so stupid 😂
I mean in utah the cops will just say nice gun bro and if you're not comitting a crime you can go on about your day
@@justinfacer621 same with Texas cops for the most part [YMMV in some jurisdictions like Austin...]
@@justinfacer621 same with Idaho. Nobody cares that you have a gun (as long as you aren’t breaking the law). Everybody has a gun.
this is hysterical. i love it. it won't last and will absolutely screw you if you get caught with it regardless, but i love it.
Malicious compliance at it's legal finest. I know their governor once said 'Get to the choppa' but that doesn't mean the needs to be helicopter parents.
Human ingenuity will never cease to amaze me. The fact that the public has to go to these lengths to use a tool granted to us by the founding fathers. Such a great work around
The founding fathers did not grant us the right. They barred the government from infringing on the people's right to keep and bears Arms. The government has been flouting the command within the 2A since 1934.
You know what they say “govt infringement of rights is the mother of all inventions”
Or is it necessity? 🤔
The right to keep and bear arms is self evident, and was simply acknowledged by the founding fathers in the Constitution. I'm nitpicking. God bless you.
@@ethanbooysen7092 I'm nit picking too. The 2A doesn't just acknowledge the right to keep and bear Arms. It took it a step further and ordered the government not to infringe on the right.
One of two things is going to happen, they’ll fix the wording of the law next year or they’ll ignore this and still arrest/confiscate weapons, or both.
Let them come. We are done bending.
“We”
Why not both? They don't care if they implicitly admit this device was legal (and so the law needs changed) while simultaneously prosecuting people for possession of this device under the old (current) law.
@@alfredc4331 yeah, I guess you're right. Not many are willing to stand up. The ATF won't go after the glock buttons in Chicago possessed by 8th graders.. because it is too dangerous. Do as you may.
If they do that, will they reopen registration like they did last time?
I'll give it a week lol
Even though these products never survive the CA legislation system, its interesting how many "technically legal" products Californians have had to deal with. Someday some collectors will pay thousands to buy our collections.
Bingo. As much as I'd like to believe. They'll change the law by lunch time with more detail.
every time CA changes the law, CA gun owners get another constitutional challenge in court.
Exactly Eddie. This is why I have not bought another compliance device after the $85 juggernaut grip. I am easily $400 deep into compliance devices.
Idk, are guns from the awb in the 90s valuable collector items?
Maybe after these laws are repealed, somebody will open a gun museum in State Line someday, and a section of the museum will have all of the stupid compliance things from California- lowers with bullet buttons, fin grips, whatever. They might make for an interesting souvenir to keep after this all blows over.
For all the people in CA, I hope this works. They are gonna get pissed and try to challenge it for sure. 🤞 It works. Good luck from the 2A state of SC.
I'm gonna let someone else get arrested first. Have them go through trial and it be thrown out by the judge before I buy this
People that don’t like the second amendment should not be cops.
while that isn't a bad statement, the real issue is the anti-gun legislature and the sheeple who vote them into office
So all cops?
That is some mental gymnastics right there holy shit. That would be amazing if this works.
CA uses mental gymnastics every day to get around basic Constitutional protections. I have no issue turning it around on them.
letter of the law, doesn't matter the stupidity of it. stupid laws beget stupid work arounds. just proves how stupid the law is.
@@SoloRenegade you're barking up the wrong tree.
California bullshit aside. This is mental gymnastics. Yes it adds up but will a judge let it hold up in court or will they say "you knew what the law meant it doesn't all have to be spelled out"
It is an amazing work around it's a big fuck you to the government but will it work is the question.
@@mikemcrunels3636 If it ever got that far, the Bruen decision could probably be used at that point.
I wonder if having this plus a bullet button will make your gun fair and square to the donut dunkers in the DOJ…?
So you’re telling me the magazine has to be fixed but they never specified which one… >:). so simple yet so elegant.
It's so simple it's genius, they never specified that it had to be the magazine that actually feeds to the receiver.
It'll last a year for them to re-write it. The company selling the product is going to be the only one who capitalizes off of this
They’ll just say the regular magazine overrides it legally because it’s not a functional or integral part of the sequence of operations
It's still illegal. Look up section 12276 of the AW ban.
A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
A pistol grip that
@@Ellis6565 That "law" doesn't override our Constitution.
This brings into sharp focus, the fact that the people who make these laws know nothing about firearms!
I feel so bad for Americans in CA. I got tired of the stupidity in MA in 2013 and moved to NH. I drive 62 miles each way to work now and could not be happier about it. Think hard about leaving that cesspool, I know uprooting you’re family isn’t easy but it was worth it for me and my kids
I love these products, I get to give a big middle finger to the government while also making fudds angry to the point they get completely irrational. I can already hear the "THIS ISN'T LEGAL WHY ARE YOU PROMOTING THIS" comments on reddit bashing me for showing one of these off.
I feel like this is just going to get the AWB rewritten when the DOJ gets word of it.
100%, it’s like prisoners constantly adapting to the corrections officers, back n forth.
Off list lowers, bullet button, SSE 1.0, SSE 2.0, others, modern fixed mags, all examples of things the CADOJ/Legislation never expected or wanted us to have.
I thought the same thing.
They won't even wait for that. They'll just issue a statement saying it's illegal and start arresting people for it.
That’s right, you should all lay down and submit.
Reno for Governor of California
im not a lizard
Only lizard people ARE california politicians…you can still run, just sayin 😂
He doesn't use hair gel by the gallon.
Newsom looks like those cliché, villain politicians that are in league with the Mob.
@@RenoMay Thats exactly what a lizard would say
Stupidest device ever. I would not want to defend myself in court for having one of these.
So one fixes a 5 rd .22 lr magazine (which serves no functional purpose other than to be there) in the grip in order to satisfy CA AW laws?
This is hilariously genius.
Oh lord... that is not going to stop any anti 2A authority.
Absolutely brilliant. They wanna play stupid games, we'll play stupid games. As always, thank you for the unsolicited legal advice Mr. Reno May Esq.
Seems the next logical step is to get the magazine to fire a 22 tracer round, to help you hit the gun grabber with the other 60 rounds in the drum.
I can already almost Scrooge McDuck dive into a pile of Allen Wrenches, happy to hear this comes with one.
1. the law is unconstitutional.
2. legal according to the law regardless of constitutionality.
3. if they want to play word games by writing laws, we can play word games by exploiting them.
Good luck explaining that to the cop... "It's legal Officer, I swear!"
I’ve met with Jason Davis when I was fighting my felony assault weapon possession case in CA he was a good honest man from what I remember. Reno you’re almost at quarter million subs! Fucking awesome man I’ve watched this channel grow and watch you physically grow lol my case got dismissed in CA officially and I’m about to get all my guns back. They didn’t want to give me back my “assault weapon” but I found a way around that, I found a FFL who has a “assault weapon permit” who can pick it up for me if I give power of attorney this way I don’t have to submit a law enforcement gun release to the DOJ and the FFL can convert it to CA compliant or mail it to me in AZ.
I would suggest to disassemble and check all your guns once you get them back. Cops like to sabotage people's stuff. Their egos can't handle losing, so, they try to "get revenge" by fuqing up the guns in a way that causes failure and permanent damage. And some just plain take internals out like the firing pin.
Such BS man, sorry you had to go through all that. This state is backwards in so many ways.
My mags were never broken. Why did they want me to fix them?
To make King Newsom happy.
@@andreivaldez2929 Supreme leader*
If they could, they'd put a chip in your brain, so they can control you directly. That's what they really wish they could "fix".
That's what you could argue in court lol (literally, -it's basically a true technicality in the law that should get you exonerated :)
"BREAKING" The AFT has declared this device a machine-gun!
I cant tell if this is a joke
@@ohmyglobohmyglob yes, hyperbole, for now!
The ATF: That is some shady shit. Reno, You just probably committed a felony on social media. You must really trust this FIFY product.
This device only skirts the first part of the law, PC 30515 (a) (1) and allows you to have the "evil features" listed under this section (pistol grip, thumbhole stock, etc.), not all of the "evil features". Read on...
PC 30515 (a) (2) still applies, meaning you can't have standard cap or any magazine with more than 10 rounds or it will still be an AW if the magwell still has a "fixed mag" limiting tool: "A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds."
Re read what you posted lol.
fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds
What magazine is fixed?
@@RenoMay - What you quoted from my quote is literally from the penal code. Forget about the FIFY for a minute: you cannot use a fixed-mag semi-auto with more than a 10-round mag, you get that right? The PC 30515 (a) (2) section? Adding the FIFY doesn't change this part of the law. Again, based on the letter that the lawyer wrote, they spoke of the FIFY as being a "redundant fixed magazine" used with an "existing fixed magazine firearm", I'm saying you cannot use that specific configuration with a 10+ round mag without violating 30515 (a) (2). Just to make sure you understand: redundant means a second; meaning there are two fixed mag devices that they're speaking of in the first paragraph, which is what I was writing and warning about being careful in such a configuration. I get that you're talking about removing the original fixed mag tool so the mag release button function as originally designed: I'm just warning folks about PC 30515 (a) (2) if they've not yet returned the mag release into a detatchable mag configuration. It's a totally stupid law, but it is still there.
@@jroysdon you’re absolutely right
this is probably the largest technicality i've seen. I love it
😂 lol love this. This is straight up trolling the DOJ.
Just reminds me how much I would HATE to live in California.. SO much uncertainty😳 Keep pushing though guys you shall take your freedom back one day at a time!
🤣🤣🤣🤣 no they won't
I was under the impression that if you go the "fixed magazine" route, you can have a fully featured rifle, but limited to 10 rounds. You can only have a standard capacity magazine if you go the featureless route. Or am I wrong on that?
yes i agree with this, because even with a fixed magazine you cant have a 30 round magazine if it has any "evil features". it has to be featureless. so i think reno is wrong on that. but what you could have here is a regular ar15 with a regular detachable 10-round magazine.
@@3spressoShot - Which sort of defeats the purpose of having an AR-15 in the first place, when the "criminal" down the street in the ghetto has a hundred (or sixty) round drum (and probably full auto).
This makes the rifle extremally safe. :)
This is exactly what the politicians wanted to make the AR completely useless. :)
Now california will ban all 5 round 22 LR magazines.
I AM SICK OF BUYING CRAP LIKE THIS
Buy a 22 so you can use the magazine with other gun as well.
Bro if this gets widely accepted I will be so excited
CA DOJ just served a cease and desist letter to Sky Tactical supply
Yup, logged into the DOJ Dros system and boom.
I'd like to thank the state of CA for everything they do to increase funding for the aftermarket firearm parts industry, as well as motivating individuals to better understand firearm laws.
Gotta love innovation. Random thought and idea, it would be cool if they made their own grips with "fify installed" engraved on the side, have a closing latch like the magpul grip and include 2 laminated cards with the legal jargon explaining its legality incase you do get confronted by LEO (hopefully one who is pro or neutral 2A). One normal sized card for the range bag or glove box and a back up that can be stashed in the grip 😁. At least if they do try to arrest or charge you, you would have some sort of legal standing that you presented what it is, how you abided with the current laws by using the device, that they were informed or "educated" on its legality, then continued to wrongfully charge and/or arrest you.
IDK how a judge will rule, but I know what they'll say: "That's just too cute." I think this device is tailor made for folks just itching to be defendants.
Oh ya. Someone is dying to get their dog shot over this.
I was involved in the initial loophole of offlist lowers in California. My apartment was raided by Police, swat, k9, helicopter the night I was having an Ugly Christmas Sweater party lol. They lined us up outside and I got to explain the loophole and law to a large group of officers...scary night but it ended up turning out okay. All the Officers left, no one arrested, no guns seized. I'll wait a little while to see if this device catches on. Very interesting
I used to know a guy in the army who thought only the military and police should have guns. I didn't like him much.
holy. crap. I LOVE THE INNOVATION of companies behind enemy lines. that's just AMAZING! i mean, it *does* adhere to the 'letter of the law'... if not the 'spirit' of it! and I LOVE IT!
You mean in friendly territory?. We are the ones behind enemy lines hoping for rations and back up.
This is hilarious and awesome. Good luck to our 2A brothers in Ca.
Holy crap, I just realized something. The fact it's inside the pistol grip means this would probably work for AR pistols as well.
Because Reno saying it didn't trigger your brain?
I dont think thats what makes it legal on pistol, its legal on pistol cuz its fixed mag. It just happened to be inside the grip
The location of the fixed mag makes no difference. Once it has a fixed mag none of the other limitations apply, including the thing about it being able to take a detachable mag outside the grip.
you could fix the magazine anywhere according to this loophole right? this isnt gonna fly. violates the spirit of the law the hole will be closed pretty quick.
@@warrenpeas AWB will be gone way before they have time to patch this bitch
i’m not even in california and I want to buy one just to support the company that made this. I think i’ll get one and engrave a middle finger on it
I paid an artist to engrave a popo badge on a dozen rounds. Can't wait to video cops face when he dares to unload it and see the personalized bullet just for them.
They will just rewrite the law that the gun can only have a single fixed mag
Oh, the double entendres. The name of the product is almost as brilliant as the product itself. I don't live in CA, but I love watching how y'all keep sticking it to the pinkos.
the fact that this is necessary anywhere in the u.s. just made me shed a tear like a native American seeing someone littering
Stay strong Dawg!
Good luck. I’ll let anyone using this be the test case for the rest of us. I’d rather just wait on Saint Benitez and eventually SCOTUS to correct the infringements masquerading as law in this Fd up state.
😂 you will be wait on systems intent on disarming you to give your rights back 🤡
@@La-di Looks like we found the guy that will go to Pelican Bay for us 😅🤣😂🤡🤡🤡🤡
If anyone is going to wait for the state to allow them to own and bear arms, then they do not support the spirit nor the conceptualization of the 2nd amendment because they are ignoring what it was made for in the first place.
If law enforcement inspected a gun with the FIFY, they would laugh in your face when you attempt to explain that there is a fixed magazine in the pistol grip. They only way to prove what you are saying would be to disassemble the lower to get the mag out and show them, but they would continue to laugh at you as they impound your rifle. I don't see this as a viable option.
Then take them to court and make them pay
Stop bending.
This is why libertarians are worse than libs, y'all just take it and don't stand up for yourself
Skeletonized grip
Man I really hopes this works for everyone in Cali because I'm in Maryland and we will probably have the same laws soon
I can safely say that I can give legal advice as I have passed the BAR and my license and name are in good standing with the ABA. That being said, I can also safely legally say that these "laws" in California that in any way, shape, form, or fashion, affect your 2nd Amendment rights, or any other Constitutional rights in the Bill of Rights, are not laws. Congress shall pass no law that violates the constitution. If a state passes a law that violates the US Constitution, then it is not a law. States can pass their own laws within that extent only.
That does not, however, mean that the state of "Commiefornia" errr... I mean California... You know what, no, I meant it the first way... anyway, it does not mean that said state will respect and uphold the Constitution, nor the Bill of Rights. Pick your fights carefully or avoid them. The choice is yours.
All jokes aside though, I find the human will to adapt to such situations as we find ourselves in, to be amazing, but absolutely despicable that such adaptation even was found to be needed in the first place due to parts of our government becoming directly tyrants in nature.
Flux flashmag “this is not a grip” level lol
It took to 6:41 before I pieced together what exactly was going on here. All I can say is bravo.
When we have to find technicalities like this to exercise our rights it shows how far our freedom has fallen.
Not legal in NY. NY stopped all these products with one simple sentence. "Cannot accept a removable magazine". So any gun that can accept a removable is privy to the AW ban.
Democrat rulers saw through "such a cheap trick." They probably all have rooms full of machine guns.
An interesting point and perhaps legal trap for a future Supreme Court case: if CA changes their law to require the feed occur from fixed magazine it opens up yet another 2A challenge.
Came for the FIFY commentary. Stayed for the sex ed talk. Great video as always dude
When I was a teenager FIFY meant something totally different.
Another alumni of the California Juvenile Hall I see
@@RobtheAviator your mom?
Group Home Life
But it not illegal, he said to his cellmate for the 50th time.
I don’t live in Califuckia, but I do enjoy the ingenuity and dedication displayed by patriotic companies like these.
Now cease and desist mailed to these guys by the CA AG.
This seems a bit hokey to me. Hope everyone stays safe and free! Lookin good Reno! Shout out to Merrick Health!
Fizeek popping through the T-shirt at this point 🙏🏻
not stopping till im big enough to lift a grown man over my head and break them like bane
I’m hearing the same questioning that happened when the bullet button first showed up.
Bullet buttons aren't legal in NY either for the same reason. You could have magazines welded all over your gun but if it can accept a magazine it falls under the assault weapon guidelines.
Who would win:
Gavin Newsome and CA DOJ
One fixed 22LR magazine
If I use this, I'll have to find a new place to store my Jellybeans.
If this works, this will
Be fucking hilarious.
The law says "Semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following..."In which case putting a non-detachable mag on the rifle doesn't disable it's capacity to accept a detachable magazine. I don't see how this could possibly be legal. But I'd love to be wrong and if I am, somebody please explain why.
No, the California law says, "(1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine but has any one of the following: " You are quoting the expired 1994 federal law.
@scottbash1717 it seems the DOJ agrees with you as they sent a cease and desist letter to Sky Tactical
@@billjohnson69The CA DOJ does a lot of things which defy legal logic.
As a california resident, criminals are treated better than law abiding citizens.
Imagine how stupid you are trying to explain that to a cop. You’ll be in jail listening to this guy.
“Integral to sequence of operations” will be the wording used to invalidate this.
This is great for you guys. I mean there just going to change the wording in a week but this is a massive bitch slap to them.
The real question is, can you convince a cop that it’s legal so he doesn’t confiscate it? The answer is definitely no.
Just let the 60 round mag do the talking
"You want your kid to grow up without a dad? / is that level IV plates?"
Skeletonized grip+highlighted printouts of the law
There’s a point where you all just need to say no, and dig your heels in.
Yes. CA DOJ has been unequivocal that they consider this device a sham as it still allows use of high capacity magazines as the actual ammunition feeding device. Strongly suggest people support CRPA and otters who are litigating unconstitutional CA laws rather than violating them and ending up indicted
If I had money to fight a case in court I would do this but I can not afford $50,000 to fight a case in court to fight for my freedom but I sure hope this works out Reno
This is big brain 4d chess type shit man. I was so confused at first. Fortunately I am in a free state for the time being. but wow.
This is absolutely hilarious 😂😂. TROLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL level 3000!!! Abolish the NFA.
Bro, the last thing you’d want is to be brought to court by the 3 letters. You can afford it, normies cannot
Maybe the Fify can be made for other rifles. Example: FN SCAR, XCR-L & XCR-M, Springfield Hellion, Beretta ARX-160, and others.