That's a fun shoot. Your friend's car is fantastic! My preference in this comparison is like yours, a tossup between P30 and Pan F. Pan F looks like it sees a little better into the shadow areas. Color sensitivity difference shows, it would just depend whether you want the reds a bit lighter or darker. I was a bit surprised about how the Delta 400 looked a bit flat and dull. Maybe it's just in comparison to these others, because it's great film too. In the bonus IR you took I'd have guessed the car was a medium yellow. It was fun to see that as well. Thanks Andy!
Thanks for the video. Yes, my decision was the same as yours but what was a little surprising was that in some shots all three films rendered the red of the car more closely than in other shots and the difference between Pan F and D400 was extremely close in most shots and practically non existent in at least one case.
Yea, p30 is my choice , too. Dont know why. More like my minds eye what red should be in mono....but really isnt that dark in reality. I can hear HotRod Lincoln playing......Mercury, same difference.
Why spend all the time grousing about how hard it is to rip open the packaging. Seems a total waste of time and has NOTHING to do with red sensitivity which you said was the topic
P30 120 was new to me at the time. I didn't complain about hard it is to open in fact, I said it was easy to open.The foil packaging was one that I had not seen before. Much better than Ilford and Kodaks. You can always skip through, and go to the red sensitivity comparisons. That's what the chapters are for in the description. 🙂
The P30 was my pick. Thanks for this Andy!
Thanks for sharing Andy
That p30 is interesting. Nice pic's.
P30 for its intense blacks.
Yeah, that P30 definitely had something about it
That's a fun shoot. Your friend's car is fantastic!
My preference in this comparison is like yours, a tossup between P30 and Pan F. Pan F looks like it sees a little better into the shadow areas. Color sensitivity difference shows, it would just depend whether you want the reds a bit lighter or darker.
I was a bit surprised about how the Delta 400 looked a bit flat and dull. Maybe it's just in comparison to these others, because it's great film too.
In the bonus IR you took I'd have guessed the car was a medium yellow. It was fun to see that as well. Thanks Andy!
Thank you, you can see very well that the film is not orthochromatic as some Leica-Hipsters claim on the web. It says panchro(matic) on the box.
Impossible to find a P30 120 roll in Italy, so consider yourself lucky ☺️. Obviously my choice will be on Ferrania.
I've got about 4 rolls left. Ferrania really needs to ramp up their production. I really want this stuff in sheet film sizes.
@@analogueandy8x10I wrote them (coz I’m Italian so easier for me) and I live not far from them 170km. Still waiting for an answer … counting sheep!
Way too cool! Love the PanF, but the Delta 400 would be easier to work with in darkroom printing.
Thanks for the video. Yes, my decision was the same as yours but what was a little surprising was that in some shots all three films rendered the red of the car more closely than in other shots and the difference between Pan F and D400 was extremely close in most shots and practically non existent in at least one case.
Yea, p30 is my choice , too. Dont know why. More like my minds eye what red should be in mono....but really isnt that dark in reality. I can hear HotRod Lincoln playing......Mercury, same difference.
Why spend all the time grousing about how hard it is to rip open the packaging. Seems a total waste of time and has NOTHING to do with red sensitivity which you said was the topic
P30 120 was new to me at the time. I didn't complain about hard it is to open in fact, I said it was easy to open.The foil packaging was one that I had not seen before. Much better than Ilford and Kodaks. You can always skip through, and go to the red sensitivity comparisons. That's what the chapters are for in the description. 🙂